Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Plan Template
Project Plan Template
5.5
Prototype test and revise database design of
Balanced Scorecard System - (ESMS
Major Issues
Item No. Description Comm
1
4
Sponsor Bill Praxton, CFO
End Date 3/28/06
Not started
On plan
1) Kick off meeting of
On plan technical group
On plan
8) Communication Plan
11) Performance
measurement training, tools,
methodology
Scorecard Model
Performance measurement
development template
Recommended Changes to
Link Processes Together
What is the PM number What metric(s) should we Is this measure a Customer, Insert major goals or
for referencing. Could use to measure whether Process, Learn & Grow or objectives in this box as a
be LMR # or a unique we have met our Resources measure based reference in completing
number for local requirements? on the BSC framework? this template
metrics?
Def
init
ion
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Major Function / Dept / Sub Service or Product Type of Measure Measure
Organizational Unit Group Line (if applicable) Justification
Insert a list of the Insert a Link here to Insert the Operating Is this measure a Why are we using this
major organizational reference back a list of Area such as Product or 1) Strategic metric?
unit names in this box Functions / Service Line - To be 2) Operational
for reference in Departments and other used for Product 3) Tactical
completing this organizational units in Performance Analysis 4) Individual
template completing this
template
Definition Data Elements To Data Source Data Collection
Be Collected Frequency
D/W/M/Q/SA/A
How do we define this What are the data Where does the data How frequently should
measure? elements for reside? the data be collected?
caclulating the
measure?
PM Calculation Actual FY 03 Actual FY 04 Green Amber Red Standard
Formula Standard Standard
What is the formula What is the What is the actual What is the What is the What is the
for calculating the actual result of result of this Green Amber Red
measure? this measure for measure for the Threshold? Threshold? Threshold?
the Year 2003? Year 2004?
Primary Data Notes
Functional POC Available?
Financial Objective
(F1) F1.1 % Revenue Growth 4
F1.2
F1.3
F1.4
Financial Objective
(F2) F2.1
F2.2
F2.3
F2.4
Financial Objective
(F3) F3.1
F3.2
F3.3
F3.4
Customer Objective
(C1) C1.1
C1.2
C1.3
C1.4
Customer Objective
(P2) C2.1
C2.2
C2.3
C2.4
Process Objective
(P1) P1.1
P1.2
P1.3
P1.4
Process Objective
(P2) P2.1
P2.2
P2.3
P2.4
Process Objective
(P5) P3.1
P3.2
P3.3
P3.4
Process Objective
(P4) P4.1
P4.2
P4.3
P4.4
L & G Objective (L1) L1.1
L1.2
L1.3
L1.4
L & G Objective (L2) L2.1
L2.2
L2.3
L2.4
L & G Objective (L3) L3.1
L3.2
L3.3
L3.4
Instructions:
Rate each Measurement for these attributes on a scale of 1 to 5:
1. Update Frequency: Measurement can get updated on a regular basis; M for Monthly, Q for Quarterly, A for Annual, etc.
2. Degree of Reliability: Can you easily measure the performance objective or is it too subjective when it comes to measurability.
3. Encourages the right behavior: Measurements should not confuse, distort, or create the wrong performance behavior within the O
4. Degree of Fit: Measurement fits with the culture and processes of Organization and flows well from Lower Level to Upper Level. (
5. Degree of Support: Client has existing procedures and processes that can support the measurement (such as available data is in p
Maximum Score 25
Degree of
Reliabilit Encourag Degree of Degree of Leading Single or
y (Hard es the Fit with Support / NonGraded Attributes or Index
Data right Client's Available Lagging Metric
vs.Subject behavior Culture Info
ive)
Total Overall
Points Grade