Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01.22.16 Coca Cola Process Description
01.22.16 Coca Cola Process Description
01.22.16 Coca Cola Process Description
Page 1 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
INTRODUCTION:
The existing WWTP of Coca Cola needs to be upgraded in order to expand and
accommodate the additional loading capacity of the plant to better comply to the
effluent quality standards set by the DENR before discharge to the nearest body
of water.
Page 2 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Based from the technical data provided to us, our company is able to have a
comprehensive design and re-engineered the existing treatment plant with the
objective of optimizing the utilization of the existing equipment and structures to
attain the most possible lowest cost for the proposed treatment plant but not
compromising the technical considerations required.
Page 3 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Page 4 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY TREATMENT:
Page 5 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The existing capacity of the is 45 m3/hr for Phase 1 and 85 m3/hr for phase 2 with
a total capacity of 130 m3/hr. To meet the requirement of the plant, 50 m3/hr
treatment unit will be added to treat a total of 180 m3/hr.
Page 6 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
To cater the additional flow capacity, one (1) unit of submersible pump of same
capacity (65 m3/hr) will be added. The raw wastewater sump now have four (4)
submersible pump operating at 3-duty-1-standby (3D + 1S) basis. These pumps
are provided to transfer the raw wastewater to the subsequent treatment.
Prior to equalization tank, the wastewater will undergo screening and oil removal.
It will pass through existing automatic bar screen and the additional capacity will
pass to the proposed static screen. Static screen is the curve stainless wedge wire
Page 7 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
hydrostatic screen used for solid-liquid separation. The specially designed non-
clog hydrostatic screen, with great opening area, offers an economical separation
process with more hydraulic capacity, higher efficiency and needs low
maintenance. Static Screen head box reduces turbulence of wastewater and
delivers flow to the wire. A swing baffle distributes flow across the width of the
screen surface and passes across the upper part of the screen panel. Most of the
solids are captured on the curved face of the screen while the liquid is drained to
the bottom part via the back of the screen. This screen provides excellent
Page 8 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
liquid/solid separation at a low capital cost and low maintenance. Screening of raw
wastewater is done to prevent easy clogging of solids larger than 5mm such as
rags, paper, plastic, metals and the like that may damage the pump. The screened
solids will be dried and collected and will be placed in plastic bags to be
discharged together with the solid waste produced from the manufacturing plant.
The screened wastewater from the existing bar screens will then passed to the
existing oil and grease removal tank and then flow to the existing collecting /
Page 9 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
equalization tank.
The screened wastewater from the static screen will flow directly to the
equalization tank since the oil and grease content is not that high and can be
removed through subsequent treatment. Since existing equalization tank is
calculated to be enough to handle the plant capacity at not less than 3 hours
retention time, therfore no additional equalization tank will be provided. Likewise,
the capacity of the existing equalization pumps are enough to pump the
Page 10 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Page 11 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
After equalization tank, flow will be pumped to biological treatment. The flow will
be divided according to the capacity of the biological treatment. 130 m3/hr will flow
to the existing SBR tank and 50 m3/hr will flow to the proposed Bauer Dynamic
SBR. Automatic modulating valve (motorized valve) will be provided to each
pipeline to control the flow. Ultrasonic non-contact flowmeter will also be provided
after each motorized valve to measure the flow coming in and it will signal the
Page 12 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
motorized valve for control ang modulation of the opening of the valve.
Since the pH of the raw wastewater is too basic with a pH range of 11-12, pH
adjustment before going to biological treatment is necessary. The pH of the
environment has a profound effect on the rate of microbial growth. pH affects the
function of metabolic enzymes. Acidic conditions (low pH) or basic conditions
(high pH) alter the structure of the enzyme and stop growth. Most microorganisms
Page 13 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Page 14 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
acid (H2SO4) with dosage of 300-500 ppm will be used to lower the pH to 8.5.
Standby Caustic dosing system will also be provided to balance the pH if
necessary. pH controller will be provided after the pH adjustment reaction loop to
measure the resulting pH after chemical addition and to signal the dosing pumps
for adjustments.
Page 15 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
SECONDARY TREATMENT
Page 16 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
aeration, 1 hour settling and 1 hour decant. While basin 1 is settling and
decanting, the other basin will be aerating and so on.
The wastewater will be equally fed continuously into the pre-aeration chambers of
the three SBR basin and is directed down through an engineered orifice opening
at the bottom of the baffle wall into the main aeration. The pre-react wall controls
the incoming flow and prevents short-circuiting and provides the pre-treatment of
Page 17 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
the waste water before it enters the main react zone. This is due to the continuous
influent flows into the pre-react zone where a high concentration of soluble BOD is
available to microorganisms in a relatively small basin volume which creates a
high “Food to Microorganisms” (F:M) ratio and encourages the maximum
biosorption of food by the microorganisms. The FM ration used in this design is
0.95 day-1. This also acts as a biological selector encouraging the proliferation of
the most desirable organisms and eliminates the growth of filamentous bacteria
that cause sludge bulking and poor settling.
Page 18 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The main react and pre-react zone has a complete air distribution system using
EPDM Fine bubble Diffusers coated with PTFE (Teflon). The PTFE coated EPDM
diffuser required no cleaning, anticipated life cycle cost benefits and reduced
maintenance. They are considered high performance due to their broad spectrum
resistance to chemicals, solvents, fats, greases, etc., which can damage
conventional elastomers. Air is supplied from the three-lobe type air blowers (1-
Page 19 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Page 20 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
operation generally run from 30 to 60 percent of the total electrical power used by
a wastewater treatment facility therefore equipping the aeration basin with on-line
DO measurement (DO meter) automates the aeration system to maintain the
correct amount of DO. DO meter will be provided on each of the SBR basin and
will be integrated to the control panel. The blower will be allowed to operate during
aeration phase to mix and oxygenate the wastewater to produce biomass or
sludge. The blower stops after completion of the aeration time and the biomass
formed are allowed to settle to the bottom of the basin leaving a layer of clear
Page 21 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The uppermost clear water is discharged from the top of the basin while the basin
is continuously receiving the influent using a rugged, corrosion resistant stainless
steel floating type decanter located on the basin center end opposite from the pre-
react zone.
The decanter is parked on the top water level (TWL) during the aeration and
Page 22 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
settling phases of the cycle, a scum / sludge exclusion installed to eliminate any
possibility of solids/biomass carryover during these periods and also allow an easy
access and service without the need to enter the basin. The floating decanter is
always under pressure both during aeration and settling as well as 3-5 minutes
before decanting to assure that no solids will carry-over with the treated water.
After the five (5) minutes time, the decanter motorized valve open to continuously
discharge the effluent to the chlorine contact tank while the air solenoid valve from
Page 23 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
the air flush line will closed. Excess sludge will be removed using non-clog
submersible pump during decant phase to maintain the appropriate MLSS (mg/L)
of 5765.09 mg/L. The amount of biomass present in the system can be checked
by getting the Sludge Volume Index (SVI) which is about 150ml/L at 30 minutes.
The sludge waste pump run can be adjusted to obtain the average MLSS of
5765.09 mg/L and MCRT of 14.56 days by adjusting the time of run at the Human
Machine Interface (HMI) mounted on the control panel.
Page 24 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Page 25 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Page 26 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
pump start and wasting times and blower adjustments. The SBR system shall
have a sequence of operations of normal cycle at dry-weatherflow and storm cycle
at wet weather flow.
The decanted wastewater from the SBR basins will be disinfected at the existing
Page 27 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Effluent tank. The chlorine shall destroy the disease-causing microorganisms. The
liquid chlorine (Sodium Hypochlorite, 7% conc) with an appropriate dosage of 3.5
mg/L will be fed automatically and mixed with the effluent of the SBR basins.
Generally, a chlorine residual of 0.5 mg/L after contact time indicates effective
disinfections. The chlorine dosing system shall be operated automatically by
synchronizing with the decanter operations. Treated effluent from the Effluent tank
will be discharge to the storm drainage or nearest body.
Page 28 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The sludge produced from Bauer Dynamic SBR will be collected at the proposed
aerobic sludge digester. Waste sludge will be stored and treated by means of
biological process called Aerobic Digestion. Aerobic digestion is a method of
sludge stabilization wherein biodegradable organic matter decomposed at about
Page 29 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
70 – 80% reduction into a relative stable compound and oxidized some cellular
material into CO2, H2O, and NO3. This process is possible by continuous mixing
and oxygenation using a blower and stainless steel bubble diffusers. The total
sludge produced from the secondary treatment is calculated to be 982.8 kg/day
and estimated to have atleast 50% reduction on the sludge digester. The digested
sludged is estimated to be 491.4 kg/day.
The stable sludge will be further treated at the dewatering facility . It will then pass
Page 30 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
through the screw press to convert the sludge to dry sludge cake with a 20%
dryness. Inorder to achieve this, polymer is injected at a dosage of 2.5 g per kg of
solids to aid in the dewatering process. The feeding of the stock solution of the
polymer is automatic by a diaphragm type dosing system. The calculated volume
of sludge after dewatering will be 2.46 m3/day. This dry sludge cake produced can
be used as organic fertilizer due to high nitrogen content of the wastewater or can
also be disposed as landfill.
Page 31 of 32
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
For further technical reference for the whole treatment process, please find
attached STP process flow diagram.
Page 32 of 32