Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit-III (DE) Dr. Suvendu Barik
Unit-III (DE) Dr. Suvendu Barik
Unit-III (DE) Dr. Suvendu Barik
Prepared
by
Dr. Suvendu Barik
Basic Theories of Trade Dr. Suvendu Barik
Assumptions:
5) Substitutes for primary products of LDCs are appearing in the
world which diminish the demands for them.
6) Producers of manufactured products in DCs do not pass on the
benefits of increase in productivity through lower prices in LDCs.
7) Income terms of trade and is the diminishing factor for economic
growth in LDCs.
EXPLANATION:
1) Technical progress: increases the income of workers and
entrepreneurs and high price for their goods, some of them are
exported to the LDC’s. But the benefits of technical progress do
not flow to the LDCs. As a result, wages of workers do not rise.
Prices of their primary goods which they export in relation to
their imports fall, thereby worsening their TOT.
Prebisch-Singer theory: EXPLANATION-
2) Relation between Income and Productivity: The increase in incomes is
less than that in productivity in LDCs due to population pressure and weak
trade unions.
3) Monopoly Elements: Another cause for deterioration in TOT of LDCs,
according to prebisch, has been monopoly elements in product markets of
DCs. The DCs have a high degree of monopoly power in manufacture
industrial and capital goods for which they charge high prices from LDCs.
On the other hand, the world prices of primary products of LDCs are low
because they are not properly organized. As a result, the TOT have remained
unfavourable for LDCs.
4) Effects of Cyclic Instabilities and Balance of Payments Difficulties:
LDCs are unable to take advantage of a fall to process of their export
products by increasing their export due to the inelastic nature of supply of
their export goods which are mainly agricultural and mineral products. On
the contrary, increased export earnings, lead to inflationary pressure,
malallocation of investment expenditure and to balance of payments
difficulties. As a result, there has been a secular deterioration In the income
TOT (Or the capacity to import) of LDC'S.
Prebisch-Singer theory: EXPLANATION-
5) Effect of Foreign investment: Singer’s contention is that the opening of
the LDCs to foreign trade and investment tended to inhibit their
development, since the purpose and the effect of these investments have
been to open up new sources of food for people and for the machines of
developed countries.
6) Debt Problems of LDCs: 1stly, a large amount of proceeds from exports
are utilized to repay their debts instead of paying for imports. 2ndly, to
repay their debts, LDCs compete with each other to increase their export
earnings.
7) Immiserising Growth: According to Bhagwati, immiserising growth in
LDCs leads to deterioration in the TOT of LDCs when- i) the economy's
growth leads to the production of more exportables; ii) the demands for
exports is inelastic; and iii) growth reduce the domestic production of
importables at constant commodity prices.
8) Shortage of Intermediate products: Due to the shortage of intermediate
products in relation to their expanding demand, they are imported at
relatively higher prices than the prices of exportables. These price
differences, results in deteriorating in TOT.
Prebisch-Singer theory: EXPLANATION-
9) Weak Bargaining Power: Most of the primary products
exported by LDCs to DCs are perishable. So they have to accept
the conditions laid down by the DCs because of their weak
bargaining power. The price and quantity conditions for exports
are always against the LDCs which leads to worsening of their
TOT.
10) Lack of Adaptability in Production: The raw materials and
agricultural products of LDCs lack in adaptability to their world
prices. When their world prices starts declining, the producers
of primary product cannot switch over production to some
other goods whose prices are not decreasing. It leads to fall in
TOT.
11) Dependence on DCs: LDCs depend on DCs for capital
equipment, machinery and know-how for their development of
import-substitution of Industries and infrastructure. These are
supplied at high export prices as compared to their export prices
which worsen their TOT.
Prebisch-Singer theory: Criticism-
1) Faulty TOT index: The thesis is based entirely on the inverse of the
new annual index of the UK's commodity TOT. This is a weak statistical
base for the generalisation that historically the TOT of LDCs have
deteriorated between1870 – 1930.
2) Not supported by empirical evidence: One is that there has been a
substantial long-term improvement in the TOT of DCs, including the
United States; the other, that there has been a significant long-term
deterioration in the TOT of primary as compared to manufactured
products. Although there have been very large swings in US TOT since
1879, no long-run trend has emerged.
3) LDCs also Export Manufactures: It is not correct to identify that all
LDCs export primary products and all DCs export manufactures bacause
there are many LDCs like India that also export manufactures, and DCs
like Australia and Denmark also export primary products.
4) Monopolistic Elements in DCs not Proved: The argument that
monopolistic elements in DCs have kept the benefits of technical
progress with themselves and have hurt the producers of primary
products in LDCs, has not been proved by any empirical evidence.
Prebisch-Singer theory: Criticism-
5) Engel’s Law not Applicable to Raw Materials: The contention that the
operation of Engel’s law tends to reduce secularly the demand for DCs
for primary products has been exaggerated because this law applies to
food and not to raw materials.
6) Neglect of Supply Conditions: The Prebisch-Singer thesis discusses
only demand conditions and ignores supply conditions in
determining TOT. But relative prices depends not only on demand
but also on supply conditions which are likely to much over long-
period.
7) LDCs Benefit from Foreign Investment: According to Fredie
Mehta, the TOT is not the most important determinant of economic
development. Though productivity gains have not been passed on
the LDCs in the form of low priced manufactures, yet they have
been passed on to them in the form of ‘product improvement’,
‘product inventions’ and ‘product diversification’.
8) Not Possible to Assess Changes in Demand of Primary
Prebisch-Singer theory: Criticism-
8) Not Possible to Assess Changes in Demand of Primary
Products: Tremendous changes have taken place in methods of
production and transportation in the world production and trade,
and in world population …
9) Export Instability not due to Price Changes Alone: According to
Mac Bean, export instability in LDCs seems to arise …
10) Foreign Investment not the Cause: There is no empirical
evidence to prove Singer’s contention that the development of the
export sector has been at the expense of the domestic sector.
Foreign investment and trade have not always stood in the way
of…
11) Weak Policy Measures: As a policy measure, Prebisch suggest
protection while Singer favours better utilisation of foreign capital.
There is no dispute …
Prebisch-Singer theory: Criticism-
12) During the 2000s commodities boom, the terms of trade of most
developing countries improved, while east Asia (which exports mostly
manufactured goods) saw deteriorating terms of trade—the opposite of
what the hypothesis generally predicts.
13) Critics argue that it is not possible to compare the prices of manufactured
goods over time because they change rapidly. The price relationship of
Prebisch–Singer does not take into account technological change. The
important thing is not the price of the goods but the service provided by
said goods.
For example, in 1800 an American worker could buy a candle that provided
one hour of light for six hours of work. But in 1997 an American worker
could buy an hour of light provided by a light bulb with barely half a
second of work.
Thus, LDC’s have not only failed to share in the productivity gains because
of population pressures ,technological backwardness, monopoly elements,
debt problems and for the principle reason that their economic activity is
dominated by the cycles of industrial activity in the DC's.
Myrdal’s Theory of Circular Causation
Book: Economic Theory and underdeveloped regions(1957).
Introduction: Prof. Gunnar Myrdal maintains that economic development results
in a circular causation process whereby the rich are awarded more favors and the
efforts of those who lag behind are thwarted. The backwash effect predominate
and spread effects are dampened.
This tends cumulatively to accentuate international inequalities and also leads to
regional inequalities within the UDCs. In UDCs a circular and cumulative
process, also known as the VCP operates downwards and being unregulated
causes increasing inequalities. Myrdal believes that our inherited theoretical
approach in inadequate to solve the problem of economic inequalities.
The reason is that traditional economic theory is based on the unrealistic
assumption of stable equilibrium:
1) Prof. Myrdal believes that it is wrong to apply the notion of stable equilibrium
for constructing a theory to explain the changes in a social system.
2) Another unrealistic assumption which is closely related to the stable equilibrium
approach is the economic factors. The classical economic theory had its principal
shortcoming in disregarding the non-economic factors.
It was due to these two unrealistic assumptions that the traditional theory failed to
state the dynamic problems of economic underdevelopment and development.
Myrdal’s Thesis (Prepared by Dr. Suvendu Barik)
Professor Myrdal builds his theory of economic underdevelopment
and development around the idea of regional inequalities on the
national and international planes. To explain it, he uses the notions
of "backwash" and "spread" effects.
He defines backwash effects as "all relevant adverse changes…of
economic expansion in a locality…caused outside that locality. I
include under this label the effects via migration, capital
movements and trade as well as the total cumulated effects resulting
from the process of circular causation between all the factors, "non-
economic" as well as "economic”.
The spread effects refer to certain centrifugal "spread effects" of
expansionary momentum from the centres of economic expansion
to other regions."
The main cause of regional inequalities, according to Myrdal, has
been the strong backwash effects and the weak spread effects in
underdeveloped countries.
Myrdal’s Thesis: A) Regional Inequalities
The genesis of regional inequalities within a country has a
non-economic basis. It is associated with the capitalist
system which is guided by the profit motive.