Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic Paper
Topic Paper
Meghan. #IAmNotADistraction: How Dress Code Policies Sexualize Young Bodies. Published
Dress codes nationwide really harm young people's thoughts, ideas, and bodily autonomy.
Dress codes typically target certain body types and a certain gender. Schools defend dress
codes by saying they are training professionalism and “leveling the playing field”.
Enforcing said dress codes however can be very problematic, and make the students feel
From a student perspective, this article shares how the dress code is viewed as a personal
attack on the individuals and their choices they make for themselves. Students are
confused about how a shoulder is sexual, how female skin is inherently sexual even
though every human has skin. Dress codes are described as sexualizing and sexualization
Mishra, Stuti. College basketball coach hits back at sexist attacks over her pink leather game
comments about an outfit she wore to a game. The comments were mainly focused
around her tight, pink pants. The people were questioning her coaching ability in tight
pants. Coach Carter responded to the comments saying “I just think that people are
Legal Momentum. Dressed and Ready to Learn: A Resource for Students, Parents and Educators
to Identify, Challenge and Change Gendered Dress Codes in K-12 Schools. Published
2022.
Dress codes are restrictive, disproportionate, perpetuate rape culture, impact minorities,
and are very invasive. Dress codes violate many people and their rights. There are
definitely better ways to go about them to make them more inclusive and still
professional.
B. Navya. The Objectification and Dehumanization of Girls Through Dress Codes. Published
2020.
Through dress codes, whose main target is teenage girls and women as a whole, there
begins a long process of sexualization and dehumanization. When dress codes prohibit
free dress it makes girls feel like objects and that their looks are the only important thing
about them. By sexualizing parts of a human body, specifically a women’s body, it takes
away accountability from the men who are viewing them sexually. As small and normal
as a shoulder has now been sexualized, what random body part is next?
Kenadie Jackson
Dr. P
COMM 1270
3 July, 2023
The Merriam Webster dictionary has defined dress code as a “formally or socially
imposed standards of dress.” There are many dress codes in the world. There are professional
attire dress codes, wedding guest dress codes, funeral dress codes, themed dress codes, beach
dress codes, work dress codes, and many more. There is a standard of dress for certain occasions,
and labeling them as such is no issue. The dress codes that are an issue are the dress codes that
make people feel uncomfortably looked at, judged, and shamed; school dress codes are a prime
example of these. Dress codes that target certain body parts are sexualizing, dehumanizing, and
Dress codes and dress code violators often feel shamed and judged for their clothing
choices,and it will typically be females in violation for being “too distracting”; “Usually what
they’re talking about are distractions of a sexual nature. These rules punish the person who is
being perceived as sexual rather than the engaging in conversations with the person who is
‘being distracted’” (Meghan). What is hard to comprehend is how shoulders, thighs, stomachs,
necks, and arms became sexual in the eyes of humans; these are body parts every person has.
Typically, these body parts are only seen as distracting when it is seen on a woman.
Gendered dress codes that enforce the notion that girls’ bodies are distracting and
boys cannot be expected to control their own actions perpetuate rape culture. It solidifies
for another generation that girls do not have full control over their own bodies and that
the way someone dresses gives someone else permission to violate them. Our boys
deserve more credit than permitting this assumption to persist and, instead, schools
should be fostering a culture of mutual respect and consent and personal responsibility
for one’s own actions. This cannot be achieved with enforcement of a gendered dress
High school journalist, Hadley Holland, writes in her school paper the “Lafayette Ledger”, about
a first hand experience of the dress code having a gender double standard:
Adding to this, there is a clear double standard between male and female students at
schools when it comes to the dress code. I, along with many other students, can testify
that with the uprising of the pulled-down-pants trend, there have been many male
students seen with their pants pulled down to their thighs with no reprimand. While
female students are getting in trouble for the sight of their shoulders and midriffs, male
students walk around participating in such trends without a single person raising an
eyebrow (Holland).
Why are girls being punished for following fashion trends and having skin while the boys are
able to walk around with their underwear out? College basketball coach, Sydney Carter, was
being attacked online for wearing tight pink pants to coach at a game. She was covered from
neck to ankle, but since her female figure was shown people online tried to say she was “Out of
dress code” (Mishra). “Dress codes…add to the objectification and dehumanization of girls.
Although it may seem like it’s preventing them from wearing inappropriate clothes or that it’s
protecting them, it actually…reinforces the idea that what they wear is the most important thing
2. School’s should hold students for being distracted accountable, rather than punishing a
3. Dress codes should be in the workforce, rather than the school yard