BEFORE THE HONERABLE STATE COMMISSION, AT NEW DELHI

REVISION PETITION NO. 306 OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF:

Haryana Urban Development Authority & Anr. ….Petitioners

Versus

Rajbir Singh ….Respondent

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the revision petition filed by the petitioner not maintainable at the

very instant. Firstly, because the present petition was filed under The

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which stands obsolete after it is repealed

by The Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Secondly, the present revision

petition also stands time barred having delayed of more than 3 years and

hence liable to be dismissed.

2. That the petitioner filed the present petition with the bad intension only

after the execution application was filed by the respondent before State

Commission, Haryana order dated 21.01.2019. The revision petition

stands completely frivolous and is based on suppressed material facts.

3. That the petitioner suppressed the facts that on 04.07.2017 the local

commissioner was duly appointed by the District Consumer Redressal

Forum, Jhajjar. Resultantly, he conducted his inspection in presence of the

 petitioner and their counsel stating in its report that there were no

developments made by the petitioner, even the basic amenities did not

exist. Thus, the petitioner malafidely mislead the respondent and in order

to encash undue money from the respondent falsely issued the allotment

letter of handing over the possession after the completion of the

development. It is firmly submitted that the respondent at no

circumstances liable to pay any interest on instalments as no development

work done by the petitioner.

4. That all the contentions raised by the petitioner in this present revision

petition stands same in toto which was already heard in length by the

District Consumer Dispute Redressal Form, Jhajjar and the State

Commission, Haryana, whereby both w pleased to pass an orders in

favour of the respondent and against the petitioner.

5. That the order passed by both District Forum and State Commission are

just, right and legally correct as the same has been ordered by taking in

view all the facts and circumstances and evidences.

6. That the petitioner has no new commission of facts and this revision has

been filed in lieu of getting stay on the execution proceedings which is

filed by the respondent against petitioner for execution of the order dated

21.01.2019 of State Commission Haryana. Thus, this revision petition is

not maintainable and liable to be dismissed.

Respondent

Through

ADVOCATES
Place: New Delhi

Date: 31.07.2022