Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MBPX Article
MBPX Article
net/publication/300021102
CITATIONS READS
0 530
2 authors, including:
Rodrigo Figueiredo
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
51 PUBLICATIONS 196 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
ANÁLISE DAS TENSÕES IN SITU NA MINA CUIABÁ – SABARÁ – MINAS GERAIS - BRASIL View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Rodrigo Figueiredo on 08 April 2016.
SUMMARY: Cuiabá mine, owned by Anglogold Ashanti Córrego do Sítio Mineração, is located in
Sabara-MG, with excavations more than 1100m below surface, is one of the most important
underground gold mines in Brazil. In recent years, there have been significant problems of
instability of the hanging wall (HW) in some stopes (production excavation). In order to understand
and anticipate the problems of instability of the hanging wall, a monitoring system was
implemented consisting of televised boreholes, in the walls of the excavation. This was in addition
to the large number of Multiple Point Borehole Extensometers (MPBX) and SMART cables
(Stretch Measurement to Assess Reinforcement Tension) installed in the mine. This paper presents
an example of the identification from monitoring, in the Fonte Grande Sul orebody – level 10.2
stope (about 680m below surface), with evidence of instability in the hanging wall. The observation
of borehole cracks, shears, failures, and displacements, indicated the beginning of instability in the
hanging wall, which allowed measures to be taken to stabilize this area. A detailed follow-up
confirmed the stabilization after actions have been implemented. In order to exploit the data
collected during the process of study and to attempt to validate a simple method for evaluating the
stability of the hanging wall in schist, a stability study was performed using the voussoir arch
theory. Despite the identification of the thickness of the beams formed within the hanging wall, the
geological complexity, evidenced by interbedded rocks with different elastic characteristics and
strength, folds and boudinage, which was beyond the simplification of the calculations, did not
allow a proper assessment of the stability of the studied area using the voussoir arch theory.
SBMR 2014
After processing the data related specifically instability.
to filmed boreholes, it was possible to recognize
the thicknesses of the beams formed by the
shear and cracks identified inside the holes in 2 CASE STUDY – 10.2 FONTE GRANDE
schistose rock in the hanging wall, thus, SUL STOPE (FGS)
together with the identification of other
parameters, an assessment was done on the For a better understanding of all the
applicability of the analogy of voussoir arch mechanisms involved in this study, site
theory for the stability assessment of the characterization is presented, covering location,
hanging wall for the study area. geometric characterization of the mining panel
as well as the geological and geotechnical
1.1 Location characteristics.
After describing the study case, the
Cuiabá mine is located close to Sabara city, interpretation of data obtained mainly by the
Minas Gerais state (Figure 1), 35 km from Belo filmed holes, it was possible to define the
Horizonte. thickness of the beam, caused by the separation
of cracks and schistose shears located in the
hanging wall.
With the geomechanical characterization of
the hanging wall, the geometry of the
excavation and knowledge of the thicknesses of
the beams, it was possible to evaluate the
applicability of the method voussoir modified
by Diederichs and Kaiser (1999a), for the study
of stability of schistose hanging wall.
Figure 1. Cuiabá mine location. Case study is located in Fonte Grande Sul
(FGS) orebody, level 10.2 between 700 and
1.2 Objectives 665m below surface (Figure 2).
SBMR 2014
orebody at 30 °. The mining method applied is all of the hanging wall exposures were
cut and fill with backfilling of waste rock and classified in bad rock mass with scores between
hydraulic fill. 1 and 4.
Grafite
9 12 63 149 0,13-0,25 12-51
phylite
Sericite
52 36 66 141 0,15-0,26 39-78
schist
SBMR 2014
2.3 Visual Scale of Cracks and Shears 8). For stable areas, in general, a typical
displacement is of ± 1.5cm near the HW face
Borehole camera monitoring was started in after blasting. Therefore this high displacement
Cuiabá mine for the identificiation and was a first indication of instability in this area.
classification of cracks and shears. Following
the collection of a large dataset, it was possible
to make a visual scale of cracks and shears
(Figure 6). This scale allow different levels of
cracks and shears.
Borehole camera monitoring of holes in the
hanging wall (HW), with mining evolution,
assisted to identify intense shearing in the
schistose mainly when the holes were more Figure 7. Vertical cross section in 10.2 FGS.
further from stope face.
SBMR 2014
hanging wall (HW). After the identification of the deterioration of
rock mass conditions, cablebolting were
installed plus the installation of plates and
barrels as reinforcement. Hydraulic filling was
also done in this stope.
• 14/03/2008 – Borehole 1 was again filmed.
Progresses in shears were identified when
compared to the previous recording (Figure 12).
SBMR 2014
Extensive mechanical rock scaling was
required to remove broken rock material . A
brow of ± 2.5m was formed in the HW with a
length of ± 10m , along the direction of
schistosity, and 13m along the dip (Figure 16).
Figure 15. Shear evolution over time for 1.1 and 7 m into
the HW.
SBMR 2014
A comparison between the displacements
collected by the 1st MPBX, the phase of
instability of HW, and the 2nd MPBX installed
subsequently after installation of cablebolting
reinforcement can be seen in Figure 18.
SBMR 2014
allowed measurements could be done to
stabilize the site. The success achieved after the
implementation of stabilization measures,
attested by monitoring, demonstrates the
efficiency of extensometers and borehole
camera as important tools to minimize the risk
of fall of ground in the hanging wall.
The analysis performed by calculation using
Figure 21. Graphite phylite immersed in sericite/chlorite the analogy of voussoir indicated a very stable
schist. situation. This result disagrees with the data
obtained by monitoring. The difference between
The thickness of the beam to be used is 2.5 m
the stability analyzes, voussoir and monitoring,
on the graphite phylite which was removed with
may be associated with frequent intercalations
the scaler equipment. Another simulation used a
of rocks with different elastic properties and
beam thickness of 4.7 m because of the
strengths that were identified within the hanging
crack/shear identified in the first and second
wall (Figure 23), beyond the possibility of
hole at the same depth within the hanging wall
improper choice of the beam thicknesses
(Figure 22).
studied.
SBMR 2014