The criteria for evaluating extemporaneous speeches are content (30%), which includes accuracy, relevance, and quality of evidence; organization (25%), such as a clear introduction, logical progression of main points, and effective conclusion; delivery (25%), like clarity, eye contact, vocal variety, and gestures; language and style (15%), including vocabulary, suitability for the audience, and language devices; and overall impression (5%), concerning engagement, confidence, and impact on the audience.
The criteria for evaluating extemporaneous speeches are content (30%), which includes accuracy, relevance, and quality of evidence; organization (25%), such as a clear introduction, logical progression of main points, and effective conclusion; delivery (25%), like clarity, eye contact, vocal variety, and gestures; language and style (15%), including vocabulary, suitability for the audience, and language devices; and overall impression (5%), concerning engagement, confidence, and impact on the audience.
The criteria for evaluating extemporaneous speeches are content (30%), which includes accuracy, relevance, and quality of evidence; organization (25%), such as a clear introduction, logical progression of main points, and effective conclusion; delivery (25%), like clarity, eye contact, vocal variety, and gestures; language and style (15%), including vocabulary, suitability for the audience, and language devices; and overall impression (5%), concerning engagement, confidence, and impact on the audience.
The criteria for evaluating extemporaneous speeches are content (30%), which includes accuracy, relevance, and quality of evidence; organization (25%), such as a clear introduction, logical progression of main points, and effective conclusion; delivery (25%), like clarity, eye contact, vocal variety, and gestures; language and style (15%), including vocabulary, suitability for the audience, and language devices; and overall impression (5%), concerning engagement, confidence, and impact on the audience.