Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Human Action: A Treatise On Economics
Human Action: A Treatise On Economics
A Treatise on Economics
Volume 2
HESESSS
LIBERTY FUND Indianapolis
Packet Page 65
This baok is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a foundation established
to encourage study of the ideal ofa society of free and responsible
individuals.
fiesbasy
CONTENTS
The cuneiform inscription that serves as our logo and as the design motif
for our endpapers is the carliest-known written appearance of the word
VOLUME 1
“freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document writien
about 2300 b.C. in the Sumerian citystate of Lagash. Editor’s Note iii
Foreword to the Fourth Fdition v
Editorial Additions © 2007 Liberty Fund, Inc. Foreword to the Third Edition
All Rights Reserved vii
First published in 1949 by Yale University Press with a reviscd edition in 1963, In
1966, Henry Regnery Company published the third revised edition in agreerment Introduction
with Yale. The fourth revised edition (and the edition used for this sctting) was 1 Economics and Praxeology 1
publishedin 1996 by The Foundation for Economic Education, Inc. in coopera- 2 The Epistemological Problem of a General Theory
tion with Bettina Bien Greaves.
Mises Made Easier: A Glossary for Ludwig von Mises' HUMAN ACTION @ 1990 of Human Action 4
Bettina Bien Greaves and reprinted with permission. 3 Economic Theory and the Practice of Human Action 7
4 Résumé 10
Front cover photograph of Ludwig von Mises used by permission
of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama
Packet Page 66
vili Q& CONTENTS CONTENTS Qw ix
Packet Page 67
X OW CONTENTS CONTENTS QW xi
o
279
The Theory of Value and Socialism Inequality of Wealth and Income 287
3 The Problem of Economic Calculation 206 Entrepreneurial Profit and Loss 289
o
4 Economic Calculation and the Market 209 Entrepreneurial Profits and Losses in a
©
Progressing Economy 294
cuapTER 12 The Sphere of Economic Calculation 212 The Moral Condemnation of Profit
1 The Character of Monetary Entries 212 Some Observations on the Underconsumption
2 The Limits of Economic Calculation 214 Bogey and on the Purchasing Power Argument
3 The Changeability of Prices 217 Promoters, Managers, Technicians, and Bureaucrats
4 Stabilization 219 The Selective Process
5 The Root of the Stabilization Idea 223 The Individual and the Market
13 Business Propaganda
CHAPTER 13 Monetary Calculation as a Tool of Action 229 1 The “Volkswirtschaft”
1 Monetary Calculation as a Method of Thinking 229
2 Economic Calculation and the Science CHAPTER 16 Prices
of Human Action 231 The Pricing Process
Valuation and Appraisement
VOLUME 2 The Prices of the Goods of Higher Orders
PART 4 Catallactics or Economics of the A Limitation on the Pricing of Factors of Production
Market Society 232 Cost Accounting
Logical Catallactics Versus Mathematical Catallactics
cHAPTER 14 The Scope and Method of Catallactics 232 Monopoly Prices
1 The Delimitation of Catallactic Problems 232 The Mathematical Treatment of the
The Denial of Economics Theory of Monopoly Prices
2 The Method of Imaginary Constructions 236 Good Will
3 The Pure Market Economy 237 Monopoly of Demand
Consumption as Affected by Monopoly Prices
‘The Maximization of Profits
Price Discrimination on the Part of the Seller
4 The Autistic Economy 243
Price Discrimination on the Part of the Buyer
5 The State of Rest and the Evenly Rotating Economy 244
12 The Connexity of Prices
6 The Stationary Economy 250
3 Prices and Income
7 The Integration of Catallactic Functions 251 14 Prices and Production
The Entreprencurial Function in the The Chimera of Nonmarket Prices
25
Stationary Economy
GHAPTER 17 Indirect Exchange
GHAPTER 15 The Market 257 Media of Exchange and Money
1
1 The Characteristics of the Market Economy 257 Observations on Some Widespread Errors
2
2 Capital Goods and Capital 259 Demand for Money and Supply of Money
3 Capitalism 264 3
The Epistemological Import of Carl Menger's
4 The Sovereignty of the Consumers 269
Theory of the Origin of Money
The Metaphorical Employment of the 4 The Determination of the Purchasing Power of Money
Terminology of Political Rule
Packet Page 68
xii Qv CONTENTS CONTENTS QW xiii
The Problem of Hume and Mill and the Driving CHAPTER 19 Interest 524
Force of Money 1 The Phenomenon of Interest 524
Cash-Induced and Goods-Induced Changes 2 Originary Interest 526
in Purchasing Power 419 3 The Height of Interest Rates 532
Inflation and Deflation; Inflationism 4 Originary Interest in the Changing
and Deflationism Economy 534
Monetary Calculation and Changes 5 The Computation of Interest 536
in Purchasing Power
‘The Anticipation of Expected Changes CHAPTER 20 Interest, Credit Expansion, and the
in Purchasing Power Trade Cycle 538
The Specific Value of Money 1 The Problems 538
The Import of the Money Relation 2 The Entreprencurial Component in the Gross
The Money-Substitutes Market Rate of Interest 539
The Limitation on the Issuance of Fiduciary Media 3 The Price Premium as a Component of the
Observations on the Discussions Concerning Gross Market Rate of Interest 541
Free Banking 4 The Loan Market 545
The Size and Composition of Cash Holdings 5 The Effects of Changes in the Money Relation
Balances of Payments 450 Upon Originary Interest 548
Interlocal Exchange Rates 452 6 The Gross Market Rate of Interest as Affected by
Interest Rates and the Money Relation Inflation and Credit Expansion 550
Secondary Media of Exchange The Alleged Absence of Depressions Under
‘The Inflationist View of History Totalitarian Management
The Gold Standard 4n 7 The Gross Market Rate of Interest as Affected by
International Monetary Cooperation Deflation and Credit Contraction 566
The Difference Between Credit Expansion and
CHAPTER 18 Action in the Passing of Time 479 Simple Inflation
1 Perspective in the Valuation of Time Periods 479 8 The Monetary or Circulation Credit Theory of the
Trade Cycle 571
2 Time Preference as an Essential Requisite of Action 483
Observations on the Evolution of the 9 The Market Economy as Affected by the Recurrence
‘Time-Preference Theory of the Trade Cycle 575
The Role Played by Unemployed Factors of
Capital Goods 490 Production in the First Stages of a Boom
w
517
Money and Capital; Saving and Investment 520 5 Gross Wage Rates and Net Wage Rates 6oo
©
Packet Page 69
Xlv 0% CONTENTS CONTENTS Q& xv
The Harmony of the “Rightly Understood” Interests CHAPTER 29 Restriction of Production 743
Vs
Packet Page 70
XVi QW CONTENTS CONTENTS QW xvii
Packet Page 71
THE SCOPE AND METHOD OF CATALLACTICS & 237
Packet Page 72
240 QW ECONOMICS OF THE MARKET SOCIETY
CATALLORACTICS THE SCOPE AND METHOD OF GATALLACTICS O® 241
men are always eager to gain the highest attainable advantage. They construct, commodities produced in plants in which wage rates are higher than in other
it is said, the image of a perfectly selfish and rationalistic being for whom noth- plants.
ing counts but profit. Such a Homo oeconomicus [(Latin) cconomic man] may Itis different with man in his capacity as spender of his income. He is free to
be a likeness of stock jobbers and speculators. But the immense majority are do what he likes best. He can bestow alms. He can, motivated by various doc-
very different. Nothing for the cognition of reality can be learned from the trines and prejudices, discriminate against goods of a certain origin or source
study of the conduct of this delusive image. and prefer the worse or more expensive product to the —technologically —
It'is not necessary to enter again into a refutation of all the confusion, error, better and cheaper one.
and distortion inherent in this contention. The first two parts of this book have As a rule people in buying do not make gifts to the seller. But nonetheless
unmasked the fallacics implicd. At this point it is enough to deal with the that happens. The boundaries between buying goods and services needed and
problem of the maximization of profits. giving alms are sometimes difficult to discern. He who buys at a charity sale
Praxeology in general and economics in its special field assume with regard usually combines a purchase with a donation for a charitable purpose. He who
to the springs of human action nothing other than that acting man wants to gives a dime to a blind street musician certainly does not pay for the ques-
remove uneasiness. Under the particular conditions of dealing on the market, tionable performance; he simply gives alms.
action means buying and selling. Everything that economics asserts about de- Man in acting is a unity. The businessman who owns the whole firm
mand and supply refers to every instance of demand and supply and not only may sometimes efface the boundaries between business and charity. If he
to demand and supply brought about by some special circumstances requir- wanls to relieve a distressed friend, delicacy of feeling may prompt him to
ing a particular description or definition. To assert that a man, faced with the resort to a procedure which spares the latter the embarrassment of living on
allernative of getting more or less for a commodity he wants to sell, ceteris alms. He gives the friend a job in his office although he does not need his
paribus [(Latin) other things being equal] chooses the high price, does not re- help or could hire an equivalent helper at a lower salary. Then the salary
quire any further assumption. A higher price means for the seller a better sat- granted appears formally as a part of business outlays. In fact it is the spend-
isfaction of his wants. The same applies mutatis mutandis [{Latin) with due al- ing of a fraction of the businessman’s income. It is, from a correct point of
teration of details] to the buyer. The amount saved in buying the commodity view, consumption and not an expenditure designed to increase the firm's
concerned enables him to spend more for the satisfaction of other needs. To profits.©
buy in the cheapest market and to sell in the dearest market is, other things be- Awkward mistakes are due to the tendency to look only upon things tan-
ing equal, not conduct which would presuppose any special assumptions con- gible, visible, and measurable, and to neglect everything else. What the con-
cerning the actor’s motives and morality. It is merely the necessary offshoot of sumer buys is not simply food or calories. He does not want to feed like a
any action under the conditions of market exchange. wolf. he wants to eat like a man. Food satisfies the appetite of many people
In his capacity as a businessman a man is a servant of the consumers, the better, the more appetizingly and tastefully it is prepared, the finer the
bound to comply with their wishes. Ile cannot indulge in his own whims table is sel, and the more agrecable the environment is in which the food
and fancies. But his customers” whims and fancies are for him ultimate is consumed. Such things are regarded as of no consequence by a consid-
law, provided these customers are ready to pay for them. He is under the eration exclusively occupied with the chemical aspects of the process of di-
necessity of adjusting his conduct to the demand of the consimers. If the gestion.” But the fact that they play an important role in the determination
consumers, without a taste for the beautiful, prefer things ugly and vulgar, of food prices is perfectly compatible with the assertion that people prefer,
he must, contrary to his own convictions, supply them with such things.” ceteris paribus, to buy in the cheapest market. Whenever a buyer, in choos-
If consumers do not want to pay a higher price for domestic products than ing between two things which chemists and technologists deem perfectly
for those produced abroad, he must buy the foreign product, provided it equal, prefers the more expensive, he has a reason. If he does not err, he
is cheaper. An employer cannot grant favors at the expense of his cus-
tomers. He cannot pay wage rates higher than those determined by the 6. Such overlapping of the boundaries between business outlays and consumptive spending is of
market if the buyers are not ready to pay proportionately higher prices for ten encouraged by institutional conditions. An expenditure debited to the account of trading ex-
penses reduces net profits and thereby the amount of taxes due. If taxes absorb 5o per cent of
5. A painter is a businessman if he is intent upon making paintings which could be sold at the profits the charitable businessman spends only so per cent of the gift out of his own pocket. The
highest price, A painter who does not compromise with the taste of the buying public and, dis- rest burdens the Department of Internal Revenue.
daining all unpleasant consequences, lets himself be guided solely by his own ideals is an artist, 7. o be sure, a consideration from the point of view of the physiology of nutrition will ot regard
a creative genius, Cf. above, pp. 13940, such fhings as negligible
Packet Page 73
242 W CATALLACTICS OR ECONOMICS OF THE MARKET SOGIETY THE SCOPE AND METHOD OF CATALLAGTICS 0% 243
pays for services which chemistry and technology cannot comprehend universal principle of alimentation valid for all men. Which one of the vari-
with their specific methods of investigation. If a man prefers an expensive ous principles one chooses depends entirely on the aims one wants 1o attain.
place to a cheaper one because he likes to sip his cocktails in the neigh- The cattle breeder does not feed his cows in order to make them happy, but in
borhood of a duke, we may remark on his ridiculous vanity. But we must order to attain the ends which he has assigned to them in his own plans. He
not say that the man’s conduct does not aim at an improvement of his may prefer more milk or more meat or something clse. What type of men do
own state of satisfaction. the man breeders want to rear—athletes or mathematicians? Warriors or fac-
What a man does is always aimed at an improvement of his own state of sat- tory hands? He who would make man the material of a purposeful system of
isfaction. Tn this sense—and in no other—we are free to use the term breeding and feeding would arrogate to himself despotic powers and would
selfishness
and to emphasize that action is nccessarily always selfish. Even an use his fellow citizens as means for the attainment of Lis own ends, which difl-
action directly aiming at the improvement of other people’s conditions is fer from those they themselves are aiming at.
selfish. The actor considers it as more satisfactory for himself to make other The value judgments of an individual differentiate between what makes
people eat than to cat himself. His uneasiness is caused by the awareness of the him more satisfied and what less. The value judgments a man pronounces
fact that other people are in want. about another mans satisfaction do not assert anything about this other man’s
Tt is a fact that many people behave in another way and prefer to fill their satisfaction. They only assert what condition of this other man better satisfies
own stomach and not that of their fellow citizens. But this has nothing to do the man who pronounces the judgment. The reformers searching for the max-
with economics; it is a datum of historical experience. At any rate, economics imum of general satisfaction have told us merely what state of other people’s
refers to every kind of action, no matter whether motivated by the urge of a affairs would best suit themselves.
man to cat or to make other people eat.
If maximizing profits means that a man in all market transactions aims
at increasing to the utmost the advantage derived, it is a pleonastic and
periphrastic circumlocution. It only asserts what is implied in the very cat-
egory of action. If it means anything clse, it is the expression of an erro-
neous idea.
Some economists believe that it is the task of economics to establish how
in the whole of society the greatest possible satisfaction of all people or of
the greatest number could be attained. They do not realize that there is no
method which would allow us to measure the state of satisfaction attained
by various individuals. They misconstrue the character of judgments which
ate based on the comparison between various people’s happiness. While ex-
pressing arbitrary value judgments, they believe themselves to be establish-
ing facts. One may call it just to 1ob the rich in order to make presents to
the poor. However, to call something fair or unfair is always a subjective
valne judgment and as such purely personal and not liable to any
verification or falsification. Economics is not intent upon pronouncing
value judgments. It aims at a cognition of the consequences of certain
modes of acting.
It has been asserted that the physiological needs of all men are of
the same kind and that this cquality provides a standard for the meas-
urement of the degree of their objective satisfaction. Tn expressing such
opinions and in recommending the use of such criteria to guide the
government’s policy, one proposes to deal with men as the breeder
deals with his cattle. But the reformers fail to realize that there is no
Packet Page 74
250 Q& CATALLACTIGS OR ECONOMICS OF THE MARKET SOCIETY THI OPF AND METHOD OF CATALLAGTICS QW 251
When men in dealing with the problems of their own actions, and when eco-
nomic history, descriptive economics, and economic statistics in reporting
6 The Stationary Economy other people’s actions, employ the terms entrepreneur, capitalist, landowner,
worker, and consumer, they speak of ideal types When economics employs
The imaginary construction of a stationary economy has sometimes the same terms it speaks of catallactic categories. The entreprencurs, capital-
been confused with that of an evenly rotating economy. But in ists, landowners, workers, and consumers of economic theory are not living
men as one meets them in the reality of life and history. They are the embod-
12, Fora further eritical examination of mathematical economics see below, pp. 355-57- iment of distinet functions in the market operations. The fact that both act-
Packet Page 75
262 Q& CATAL AGTICS OR ECONOMICS OF THT MARKET SOCILTY THE SCOPE AND METHOD OF GATALLACTICS QW 253
ing men and historical sciences apply in their reasoning the results of eco- special group or class of men; it is inherent in every action and burdens every
nomics and that they construct their ideal types on the basis of and with ref- actor. In embodying this function in an imaginary figure, we resort to a
erence to the categories of praxeological theory, does not modify the radical methodological makeshift. The term entrepreneur as used by catallactic the-
logical distinction between ideal type and economic category. The eco- ory means: acting man exclusively scen from the aspect of the uncertainty in-
nomic categories we are concerned with refer to purely integrated functions, herent in every action. In using this term one must never forget that every ac-
the ideal types refer to historical events. Living and acting man by necessity tion is embedded in the flux of time and therefore involves a speculation. The
combines various functions. He is never merely a consumer. He is in addi- capitalists, the landowners, and the laborers are by necessity speculators. So is
tion either an entrepreneur, landowner, capitalist, or worker, or a person sup- the consumer in providing for anticipated future needs. There’s many a slip
ported by the intake earned by such people. Moreover, the functions of the twixt cup and lip.
entrepreneur, the landowner, the capitalist, and the worker arc very often
Let us try to think the imaginary construction of a pure entrepreneur to
combined in the same persons. History is intent upon classifying men ac- its ultimate logical consequences, This entreprencur does not own any cap-
cording to the ends they aim at and the means they employ for the attain-
ital. The capital required for his entreprencurial activities is lent to him by
ment of these ends. Economics, exploring the structure of acting in the mar-
the capitalists in the form of money loans. The law, it is true, considers him
ket society without any regard to the ends people aim at and the means they
employ, is intent upon discerning categories and functions. These are two the proprietor of the various means of production purchased by expanding
the sums borrowed. Nevertheless he remains propertyless as the amount of
different tasks. The difference can best be demonstrated in discussing the
his assets is balanced by his liabilities. If he succeeds, the net profit is his.
catallactic concept of the entreprencur.
In the imaginary construction of the evenly rotating economy there is no If he fails, the loss must fall upon the capitalists who have lent him the
room left for entrepreneurial activity, because this construction eliminates funds. Such an entreprencur would, in fact, be an cmployee of the capi-
any change of data that could affect prices. As soon as one abandons this talists who speculates on their account and takes a 100 per cent share in the
assumption of rigidily of dala, oue finds that action must needs be affected net profits without being concerned about the losses. But even if the entre-
by every change in the data. As action necessarily is directed toward preneur is in a position to provide himself a part of the capital required and
influencing a future state of affairs, even if sometimes only the immediate borrows only the rest, things are essentially not different. To the extent that
future of the nest instant, it is affccted by every incorrectly anticipated the losses incurred cannot be borne out of the entreprencur’s own funds,
change in the data occurring in the period of time between its beginning they fall upon the lending capitalists, whatever the terms of the contract
and the end of the period for which it aimed to provide (period of provi- may be. A capitalist is always also virtually an entrepreneur and speculator.
sion'). Thus the outcome of action is always uncertain. Action is always He always runs the chance of losing his funds. There is no such thing as a
speculation. This is valid not only with regard to a market economy but no perfectly safe investment.
less for Robin n Crusoe, the imaginary isolated actor, and for the condi- The selfsufficient landowner who tills his estate only to supply his own
tions of a soc list economy. In the imaginary constuction of an evenly household is affected by all changes influencing the fertility of his farm or his
rotating system nobody is an entrepreneur and speculator. In any real and personal needs. Within a market cconomy the result of a farmer’s activities is
living economy every actor is always an entrepreneur and speculator; the affected by all changes regarding the importance of his piece of land for sup-
people taken care of by the actors—the minor family members in the mar- plying the market. The farmer is clearly, even from the point of view of mun-
ket society and the masses of a socialist society—are, although themselves dane terminology, an entreprencur. No proprietor of any means of produc-
not actors and therefore not speculators, affected by the outcome of the ac- tion, whether they are represented in tangible goods or in money, remains
tors’ speculations. untouched by the uncertainty of the future. The employment of any tangible
Economics, in speaking of entreprencurs, has in view not men, but goods or money for production, i.c., the provision for later days, is in itself an
a definite function. This function is not the particular feature of a entrepreneurial activity.
13 CF. helow, p. 481 Things are essentially the same for the laborer. He is born the
Packet Page 76
254 O CATALIACTICS OR ECONOMICS OF THE MARKET SOCLETY THI SCOPE AND METHOD OF CATALLACTICS O 255
proprietor of certain abilities; his innate faculties are a means of production expected changes in conditions, those who have more initative, more ven-
which is better fitted for some kinds of work, less fitted for others, and not at turesomeness, and a quicker eye than the crowd, the pushing and promoting
all fitted for still others."* If he has acquired the skill needed for the perfor- pionecs of economic improvement. This notion s narrower than the concept
mance of certain kinds of labor, he is, with regard to the time and the material of an entreprencur as used in the construction of functional distribution; it
outlays absorbed by this training in the position of an investor. He has made does not include many instances which the latter includes. It 1s awkward that
an input in the expectation of being compensated by an adequate output. The the same term should be used to signify two different notions. It would have
laborer is an entrepreneur in so far as his wages are determined by the price been more expedient to employ another term for this second notion —for in-
the market allows for the kind of work he can perform. This price varies ac- stance, the term promoter.
Itis to be admitted that the notion of the entreprencur-promoter cannot be
cording to the change in conditions in the same way in which the price of
defined with praxcological rigor. (In this it is like the notion of money which
every other factor of production varics.
In the context of economic theory the meaning of the terms con-
— different from the notion of a medium of exchange—a rigid prax-
also defies
eological definition.!®) However, economics cannot do without the promoter
cerned is this: Entreprencur means acting man in regard to the changes concept. For it refers to a datum that is a general characteristic of human na-
oceurring in the data of the market. Capitalist and landowner mean
|
ture, that is present in all market transactions and marks them profoundly.
acting man in regard to the changes in value and price which, even This is the fact that various individuals do not react to a change in conditions
with all the market data remaining equal, are brought about by the with the same quickness and in the same way. The inequality of men, which
|
mere passing of time as a consequence of the different valuation of is due to differences both in their inborn qualities and in the vicissitudes
present goods and of future goods. Worker means man in regard to the of their lives, manifests itself in this way too. There arc in the market pace-
|
employment of the factor of production human labor. Thus every func- makers and others who only imitate the procedures of their more agile fellow
tion is nicely integrated: the entreprencur earns profit or suffers loss; the citizens. The phenomenon of leadership is no less real on the market than in
owners of means of production (capital goods or land) earn originary any other branch of human activities. The driving force of the market, the el-
interest; the workers earn wages. In this sense we elaborate the imagi-
ement tending toward unceasing inmovation and improvement, is provided by
the restlessness of the promoter and his eagerness to make profits as large as
nar y construction of functional distribution as different from the actual
historical distribution.’®
possible.
There is, however, no danger that the equivocal use of this term may result
Economics, however, always did and still does use the term “en- in any ambiguity in the exposition of the catallactic system. Wherever any
treprenewr” in a sense other than that attached to it in the imaginary doubts are likely to appear, they can be dispelled by the employment of the
construction of functional distribution. It also calls entrepreneurs those term promoler instead of entrepreneur.
who are especially eager to profit from adjusting production to the
14 I what sense labor is ta be scen as a nonspecific factor of production see above, pp. 133-35. ‘The Entrepreneurial Function in the Stationary Economy
15. Let us emphasize again that everybody, laymen included,
in dealing with the problems of in-
come determination always takes recourse to this imaginary construction. The economists did not The futures market can relieve a promoter of a part of his entrepreneurial
invent it they only purged it of the deficiencies peculiar to the popular niotion. For an epistemo- function. As far as an entreprencur has hedged himself through suitable for-
logical treatment of functional distribution ef. John Bates Clark, The Distribution of Wealth (New
York, 1908), p. 5, and Eugen von Bohm-Rawerk, Gesamuelte Schriften, ed, F, X. Weiss (Vienna, ward transactions against losses he may possibly suffer, he ceases to be an en-
1924), p. 205. The term distribution must not deceive anybudy; its employment in this context is treprencur and the entrepreneurial function devolves on the other party to
to be explained by the role played in the history of economic thought by the imaginary construc- the contract. The cotton spinner who, buying raw cotton for his mill, sells the
tion of a socialist stale (cf. above, p 240) There is in the operation of a matket cconomy nothing same quantity forward has abandoncd a part of his entreprencurial function
which could properly he called distribution. Goods are not first produced and then distributed, He will neither profit nor lose from changes in the cotton price occurring in
as would be the casc in a socialiststate. The word “distribution” as applicd in the term “functional
distribution” complies with the meaning attached to “distribution” 150 years ago. In present- the period concerned. Of course, he does not entirely cease to serve in
day English usage “distribution” signifies dispersal of goods anong consumers as cffected by
commerce. 16. CE below, p. 308
Packet Page 77
256 QW CATALLACTICS OR ECONOMICS OF THE MARKFT SOCIETY
Packet Page 78