MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JACEL MAE E. BAYARCAL Name of Rater: MARITES R. PACATANG

Position: TEACHER III Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 - FEBRUARY 2023 Date of Review: FEBRUARY 10, 2023

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. 1. Applied knowledge 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Content of content within and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services Knowledg across curriculum observer agreement form/s done
e and teaching areas. through onsite / face-to-face / in-
Pedagogy (PPST 1.1.2) person classroom observation. Very Very
4 4 Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory Satisfactory
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
classes are not implemented,

● through observation of
synchronous / Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* Very
via LAC session. 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range of Classroom Observation Tool
Education teaching strategies (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services that enhance learner observer agreement form/s done
achievement in through onsite / face-to-face / in- Quality Very
4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
literacy and numeracy person classroom observation. Satisfactory
skills. (PPST 1.4.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Timeliness
other modalities; or
Very Very
● through observation of a 4 4 Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory Satisfactory
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 3. Applied a range of Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education teaching strategies to (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services develop critical and observer agreement form/s done
creative thinking, as through onsite / face-to-face / in- 4 Outstanding 5 Outstanding Outstanding
well as other higher- person classroom observation.
order thinking skills.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
(PPST 1.5.2)
classes are not implemented, Efficiency

● through observation of Very

4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other Timeliness
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. 4. Managed 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Learning classroom structure to (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services Environm engage learners, observer agreement form/s done Very
ent and individually or in through onsite / face-to-face / in- 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
Diversity groups, in meaningful person classroom observation.
of exploration, discovery
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
Learners and hands-on Efficiency
classes are not implemented,
activities within a
range of physical
learning ● through observation of
5 Outstanding 5 Outstanding Outstanding
environments. (PPST synchronous / asynchronous
2.3.3) teaching in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via Timeliness
LAC session.
Basic 5. Managed learner Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s done
applying positive and through onsite / face-to-face / in- Very
3 Satisfactory 4 Very Satisfactory
non-violent discipline person classroom observation. Satisfactory
to ensure learning-
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
focused
classes are not implemented,
environments. (PPST Efficiency
2.6.2)
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or Very
4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 6. Used differentiated, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education developmentally (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services appropriate learning observer agreement form/s done
experiences to through onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classroom observation. Very
address learners’ 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
gender, needs,
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
strengths, interests
classes are not implemented,
and experiences.
(PPST 3.1.2)
● through observation of Efficiency
synchronous / asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or
Very Very
● through observation of a 4 4 Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory Satisfactory
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. 7. Planned, managed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Curriculu and implemented (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services m and developmentally observer agreement form/s done
Planning sequenced teaching through onsite / face-to-face / in-
and learning person classroom observation. Very
processes to meet 3 Satisfactory 4 Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
curriculum
classes are not implemented,
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. (PPST ● through observation of
4.1.2) synchronous / Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or Very
4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
● through observation of a Satisfactory
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial discussions LAC sessions / FGDs /
that use teacher and meetings / other collegial 3 Satisfactory 5 Outstanding Outstanding
learner feedback to discussions
enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC sessions /
practice. (PPST 4.4.2) FGDs / meetings / other
collegial discussions on Efficiency
use of teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness 4 Very 5 Outstanding Outstanding
practices following
Satisfactory
participation from LAC
sessions / FGDs /
meetings / other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective)
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education developed, organized (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and used appropriate observer agreement form/s done
teaching and learning through onsite / face-to-face / in- Very
4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
resources, including person classroom observation. Satisfactory
ICT, to address
learning goals. If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
(PPST 4.5.2) classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in Very
other modalities; or 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Assessm selected, organized (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services ent and and used diagnostic, observer agreement form/s done
Reporting formative and through onsite / face-to-face / in-
summative person classroom observation.
assessment strategies
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
consistent with
classes are not implemented,
curriculum
requirements.
(PPST 5.1.2) ● through observation of
Very
synchronous / 3 Satisfactory 4 Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Efficiency

Very
4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education evaluated learner ● Individual Learning
Services progress and Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
achievement using Very
● Peer assessment data 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
learner attainment Satisfactory
data.
● Sample of learners’ output
(PPST 5.2.2) with reflection / self-
assessment
● Progress charts/anecdotal
records Efficiency
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing index
of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most mastered
skills
● Any equivalent ALS
Timeliness
form/document that highlights
the objective (e.g., Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Very Very
4 4 Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory Satisfactory
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 12. Communicated Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education promptly and clearly ● A sample of corrected test
Services the learners’ needs, paper of a learner in a
progress and Very Very
learning area with parent’s or 4
Satisfactory
4
Satisfactory
Very Satisfactory
achievement to key
guardian’s signature and date
stakeholders,
of receipt
including
parents/guardians ● Minutes of meetings with
(PPST 5.4.2) key stakeholders (e.g., PTA, Efficiency
SGC, SPT, CPC) with proof of
attendance
● Report card with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
● Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using various Timeliness
modalities
● Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights
Very
the objective 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

5. 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry Quality

Personal personal that highlights the application Very Very
4 4 Very Satisfactory
Growth philosophy of of a learner-centered teaching Satisfactory Satisfactory
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
and teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan Efficiency
Professio learner-centered. or community work Very Very
nal (PPST 7.1.2) 4 4 Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory Satisfactory
Developm
ent
14. Set 1. Certification from the ICT Quality
professional Coordinator / School Head / 5 Outstanding 5 Outstanding Outstanding
development goals Focal Person in charge of e-
based on the SAT Efficiency
Very
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness
Very
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from 4 5 Outstanding Outstanding
Satisfactory
(PPST 7.5.2) Phase II
Basic Plus 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education Factor various related ● committee involvement;
Services works / ● involvement as
activities that module/learning material
contribute to writer/validator; 5 Outstanding 5 Outstanding Outstanding
the teaching- ● involvement as a resource
learning process
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction; Efficiency
● book or journal authorship/
co-authorship/contributorship
;
● 5 Outstanding 5 Outstanding Outstanding
advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
● participation in
demonstration teaching;
● participation as research Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Head Teacher) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
presenter in a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of
pre-service/in-service
teachers;
● conducted research within
the rating period;
● others (please specify)

1. with annotation on how it

contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

JACEL MAE E. BAYARCAL MARITES R. PACATANG PEDRO R. ESTAÑO JR., PhD

Teacher III Head Teacher III School Principal IV
Ratee Rater Approving Authority