Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Cabural 1

CABURAL, John Matthew A.

I – BA Anthropology

English 13 WFW5

Analysis Paper (1477)

15 December 2023

Breaking Taboos: A Comparative Odyssey through Filipino and Dutch Sexuality Education

The Philippines, deeply ingrained with its colonial history under predominantly Roman Catholic

nations, has been a focal point in gender studies, often deemed an unlikely environment for fostering inclusion

for gender minorities (Manalastas 60). As such, the topic of sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression

(SOGIE) remains taboo in Filipino homes, creating challenges for queer youth in navigating their identity. In

due course, the queer grapples with a confounding three-step exploration of their gender and sexuality. Firstly,

the queer struggles to label themselves with an appropriate gender identity at the age of 6 (Perry 2). Without

proper guidance from their family and their education, they venture out to new avenues, particularly the

Internet. The advent of these emergent technologies proves to be a double-edged sword because while some

spaces are safe, some are inhabited by manipulative adults with ulterior motives (Castañeda 31). Penultimately,

the queer forms support groups to overcome social and psychological isolation through shared experiences

with similar people, leading to a more socially aware individual with a nexus of advocacies for different causes

(LaCoursiere 22). Finally, as the queer gets more personally involved and socially conscious, they are classified

into two categories: the bakla, the effeminate lower-class, or the gay, the masculine higher-class. This dissonance

in self-expression drives the queer to seek validation, often leading to an obsession with pornography (Cao 3).

Seen in this context, it can be inferred that there seems to be a greater need for acceptance towards the

LGBTQIA+ community to safeguard their journey. It is only in a youth-centric, contextualized implementation

of a sexuality education curriculum which encompasses scientifically accurate information about human

development and reproductive health; contraception, childbirth, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs); and
Cabural 2

productive pedagogy of societal perceptions on sex that we can attain this challenging yet all the more important

goal. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate another country’s successful sexuality education curriculum and

situate it in the Philippine context to serve as a framework for amending a localized sexuality education law.

To comprehensively compare, the chosen object of study, the Netherlands’ successful sexuality

education curriculum, will undergo a thorough comparative analysis alongside the Philippines’ current sexual

education curriculum, with emphasis on statistical outcomes in teenage pregnancy, abortion, and contraceptive

use. The Netherlands, a relatively small but densely populated Western European country with 17 million

residents, has drawn scholarly attention for its approach to adolescent sexual health (Andeweg 13). Noted for

its low teenage pregnancy rates and high contraceptive use, the country’s statistics in 2016 revealed only 3.2 per

1,000 girls gave birth under 20, and a 65% contraceptive use prevalence, resulting in a relatively low abortion

rate of 151 per 1,000 live births (Central Bureau voor de Statistiek; European Contraception Policy Atlas).

These statistics are supported by the fact that the curricula deriving from Dutch programs are now in effect in

at least 12 countries, including Vietnam, Burundi, and Malawi (Vanwesenbeeck 21). In view of these certainties,

the Netherlands offers itself to be a compelling object of study by zooming in on some legal provisions and

curriculum content for a comparative analysis with the Philippines.

In contrast to countries like the United States of America (USA), which often promotes abstinence-

only education, the Dutch approach to sexuality education, which equips the youth with information about

other methods of sexual protection, stands out. This is because the former approach is not considered to be a

deterrent to sexual activity, with studies indicating that 50% of STI reported cases are among individuals under

25 in the USA (Rosenberg). The Dutch curriculum, however, adopts a different perspective, emphasizing that

sex is a “natural part of growing up” (Schalet 10). Understood in this context, Dutch schools are mandated by

the 2012 Law on Education Goals to provide compulsory classes about sexuality education starting from age

4. To strengthen the case, it is imperative to introduce Long Live Love, their theory-based, government funded

sexuality education program which tackles topics of safe sex, relationships, and sexuality through its program

materials and implementation approach (Vanwesenbeek 95). Funded by sponsor organizations such as Rutgers
Cabural 3

Nisso Groep and STI Aids Netherlands, the materials include a European passport about safe sex during

vacation, brochures on STI prevention, a comic strip on condom use, an instruction manual for contraceptive

pill use, and booklets on puberty guides (96). These resources, paired with the lessons, provide comprehensive

guidance, with the youth consulting their materials anytime and trusting themselves to always make the correct

decision. Branching out to the lesson’s themes, the materials also do not sugarcoat the topic of reproduction in

its language (98). Further, the program encourages assertiveness in decision-making and communication of

personal boundaries through an indigenous concept called Weerbaarheid (99). Also noteworthy are three salient

messages on safe sex: 1) birth control is the best protection against pregnancy; 2) a condom is the best

protection against STIs; and 3) the pill does not protect against STIs – all pointing to the central message of

the Double Dutch method – if you have sex, use a pill and a condom together (100). In a nutshell, the Dutch

curriculum, exemplified by the Long Live Love program, presents a stark departure from the abstinence-only

model prevalent in many countries, like the Philippines. By placing emphasis on viewing sex as healthy and

natural, the Dutch curriculum takes a realistic and comprehensive stance on sexuality education.

Unfortunately, the current state of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is hindered by its religious

and socio-economic backdrop. With around 80% of the population identifying as Roman Catholic, clashes

between traditionalism and progressivism impede the integration of CSE into the curriculum. Accordingly, the

Catholic Church plays a big role in hampering the progress of sexuality education (Ochoa 1-2). To further this

point, socio-economic lenses also equip us with the information that teenage pregnancies are often the result

of social development issues like lack of education and poverty (Salvador 1). This is strengthened by a survey

conducted by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) which reveals that teenage pregnancy was most common

among women who have only completed primary education and are poor. Having said that, it is not completely

hopeless because in December 2012, the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012, or

Republic Act No. 10354, was turned into a landmark law. Although slow, progress was still made because under

the law are its provisions that provide universal and free access to modern contraceptive methods and mandates

age and development-appropriate reproductive health education in the public school system (Official Gazette).

However, the law still lacks teeth to mobilize the law forward due to its obscure implementation plans,
Cabural 4

evaluation measures, and budgetary requirements. Despite promises of free access to contraceptives, the 1.9

million unwanted pregnancies and around 610,000 unsafe abortions each year do not correspond with it

(Guttmacher Institute 3). In the same vein, the law also pledges quality CSE to its students, yet students

expressed their dismay to its ineffectiveness and highlighted their need for discussions about sex and sexuality

(La Bella 41-42). Ultimately, the youth’s self-awareness is certainly a step in the right direction as they recognize

the need for a comprehensive sexuality education.

Now that both have been assessed, the next step would be integrating the Netherlands’ curriculum

into the Philippines’ educational landscape. Despite the dogmatic religious and socio-economic factors plaguing

the Philippines, a strategic approach is outlined by Rutgers, the organization behind the Dutch’s program’s

success. Starting at ages 4-5, Rutgers’ curriculum highlights discussions of feelings and delineating the gender

spectrum binary. Similarly, kindergartens in the Philippines can incorporate innovative approaches by

associating colors with emotions and genders. At ages 7-9, discussions of respect and attraction are thoroughly

discussed. By ages 10-11, topics include puberty, love, and media (Seisen 1). At this point, the Department of

Education (DepEd) can insert one subject per grade level, discussing reproduction in a direct manner. Booklets

can also be disseminated for further consultation by the students. Open communication between the parents

and the school through parent-teacher conferences (PTCs) can also be facilitated. In proper implementation,

the Filipino youth, equipped with comprehensive knowledge, will be able to make informed decisions.

However, this will not be done overnight and without proper support. Therefore, this paper is a call to the

government agencies responsible for effecting change, primarily the Department of Education (DepEd), the

Department of Health (DOH), and the Senate. All three, alongside the civil society, should collaborate in

overseeing and guiding the implementation of this adapted curriculum, ensuring its alignment with the

sensitivities and the cultural context of the Philippines. Their endorsement and active involvement will lend

credibility to the program, garnering support from educators, parents, and the community at large. By leveraging

the expertise of these key government agencies along with the civil society, the Philippines can navigate the

complexities of introducing a comprehensive sexuality education program and pave the way for a more

informed and empowered younger generation.


Cabural 5

Works Cited

Andeweg, Rudy B., et al. “Governance and Politics of the Netherlands.” Google Books, Bloomsbury Publishing,

2020,

books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=MpJKEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=netherlands+prog

ressive+policies&ots=5wiv1yKBDP&sig=QM06Ru9uyGO2hzhxqAuN17qFzSk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&

q&f=false. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

Davy, Zowie, et al. “The SAGE Handbook of Global Sexualities.” Google Books, SAGE Publications, 2020,

books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=AfHgDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA207&dq=netherlands+se

x+education&ots=MFoAE6mJJ4&sig=4BapO3rv1Nt5Edbo8KxwdeckxzA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=n

etherlands%20sex%20education&f=false. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

de Melker, Saskia. “The Case for Starting Sex Education in Kindergarten.” PBS NewsHour, 27 May 2015,

www.pbs.org/newshour/health/spring-fever. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

Gabriel, Jan, and Melendrez Castañeda. “Grindring the Self: Young Filipino Gay Men’s Exploration of Sexual Identity

through a Geo-Social Networking Application.” Journal of PsyChology, vol. 48, no. 1, 2015, pp. 29–58,

Ketting, E., and A. P. Visser. “Contraception in the Netherlands: The Low Abortion Rate Explained.” Patient

Education and Counseling, vol. 23, no. 3, 1994, pp. 161–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(94)90032-9.

Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

“Long Live Love. The Implementation of a School-Based Sex-Education Program in the Netherlands | Health and

Education Resource Centre.” Healtheducationresources.unesco.org,

healtheducationresources.unesco.org/library/documents/long-live-love-implementation-school-based-sex-

education-program-netherlands. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.


Cabural 6

Manalastas, Eric Julian, et al. LGBT psychology in the Philippines; Psychology of Sexualities Review 7.1 (2016)

https://pages.upd.edu.ph/sites/default/files/ejmanalastas/files/manalastas_torre_lgbt_psychology_in_the_p

hilippines_posr_71_0.pdf

Official Gazette. “Republic Act No. 10354 | GOVPH.” Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, 21 Dec.

2012, www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/12/21/republic-act-no-10354/. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

“(PDF) Virtual Masquerade: Understanding the Role of Twitter’s Alter Community in the Social and Sexual

Engagements of Men Who Have Sex with Men.” ResearchGate,

www.researchgate.net/publication/341867574_Virtual_Masquerade_Understanding_the_Role_of_Twitter%2

7s_Alter_Community_in_the_Social_and_Sexual_Engagements_of_Men_Who_Have_Sex_with_Men.

Pittman, Vicki, and Athanase Gahungu. “Comprehensive Sexuality Education or Abstinence-Only Education, Which

Is More Effective?” Journal of Research for Educational Leaders JREL, vol. 3, no. 2, 2006,

www2.education.uiowa.edu/archives/jrel/spring06/documents/Pittman_0514.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

Policy Brief Number 4 SEXUALITY EDUCATION WHY SHOULD SEXUALITY EDUCATION BE

DELIVERED in SCHOOL-BASED SETTINGS? eeca.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-

pdf/CSE%20Policy%20Brief%204_FINAL_WEB_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

Schutte, Lisette, et al. “Long Live Love. The Implementation of a School-Based Sex-Education Program in the

Netherlands.” Health Education Research, vol. 29, no. 4, Aug. 2014, pp. 583–97,

https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyu021. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

“The Benefits of Progressive Sex Education - a Look into the Dutch Curriculum.” Www.seisen.com,

www.seisen.com/student-life/seisen-post/features/~board/seisen-post/post/the-benefits-of-progressive-

sex-education-a-look-into-the-dutch-curriculum. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

Versloot-Swildens, M. C., et al. “Effectiveness of a Comprehensive School-Based Sex Education Program for Young

Adolescents in the Netherlands.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Springer Science+Business Media, Dec.

2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01903-6. Accessed 15 Dec. 2023.

You might also like