Doctor of Philosophy Program in Integrated Chemical Engineering,

Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University

Student name Student ID

Score
Lists Evaluation index Remark
1 2 3 4 5
6. Contents o Appropriate literature survey (ELO5)
(ELO1, ELO2, o Problem defined clearly (ELO1)
ELO4, ELO5) o Clear objective stated (ELO1)
o Appropriate research methodology (ELO2)
o Discussion of problem and/or proposed
solution(s) in relation to approaches (ELO1)
o Issue summarized/concluded effectively (ELO4)
7. Delivery o Speaker’s preparedness/knowledge
(ELO4) o Speaker’s ability to engage audience
o Clear pronunciation of words and appropriate
volume
o Eye contact/ not read from script
o Professional manner/gesture/ appropriate for
academic presentation
o Overall presentation style
8. Time o Delivered in assigned time i.e. not too long or
management too short
(ELO4) o Use of appropriate time for each section
o Overall time management
9. Presentation o Organization of topics
media (ELO4) o Clarity and accuracy of language
o Audio/visual materials appropriate for
presentation (e.g., amount, use of, visibility,
appearance, font size, color etc.)
o Appropriate animation
o Overall media style
10. Question and o Clear answers to questions
answer (ELO4) o Response to questions
o Background knowledge for answering questions
o Communication skills
o Overall answers to questions

Note: Score rating [1] = Not very successful, [2] = Could be better, [3] = Average only, [4] = Quite Good, [5] = Very Good
Comments:

Evaluator:
 Dissertation evaluation form
Doctor of Philosophy, Integrated Chemical Engineering (International Program)
Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University

Student name ………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Evaluator name ………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Title of dissertation ….………………………………………………………………………………………………
Note: Score rating [1] = Not very successful, [2] = Could be better, [3] = Average only, [4] = Quite Good, [5] = Very
Good

Rating
Category Criteria
1 2 3 4 5

1. General features ● Problem definition

of dissertation
● Background

● Approach

● Analysis of findings

● Significance and importance of the

findings/conclusions/achievement

● Ethical aspects

Comments:

2. Quality of written ● Correctness for punctuation, grammar, spelling, typographical

communication errors, or language
● Correctness for layout, formatting of dissertation, tables, figures,
and reference list
Comments:

3. Comments:
 Report evaluation form
Doctor of Philosophy, Integrated Chemical Engineering (International Program)
Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University

Student name ...………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Evaluator name ………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Title of report ….………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Note: Score rating [1] = Not very successful, [2] = Could be better, [3] = Average only, [4] = Quite Good, [5] = Very
Good

Rating
Criteria
1 2 3 4 5 NA

● Interest level of topic

● Abstract, Introduction, and Objectives

● Literature review and coverage of the topic

● Design for the proposed system

● Analysis and Presentation of results

● Conclusion and recommendations

● Structure, Organization, Clarity, Layout

● Quality of information and presentation

● The neatness of tables, figures, charts, diagrams, and referencing

● Grammar, Usage, Mechanics, Spelling

● Originality in writing

● Timeliness

● Collaboration in team

Comments: