Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thesis Proposal-1
Thesis Proposal-1
Thesis Proposal-1
Topic:
The topic I have chosen for my masters are second language learners, adaptation, English,
how does school/teachers adapt for pupils with another first language than Norwegian,
differentiated instruction.
After working with this subject, second language teaching both with age 13-16 and then now
with adults, the subject has grown on me, making me question a lot and making it a subject I
want to look more into. Norwegian classrooms get filled with pupils with diverse background
where some gets placed in classrooms where they don’t even know the first language. How
are these pupils taken care of? How do you teach a second language when the pupil does not
even master the first language being used in the classroom.
This masters paper will contribute more to my own learning than anything else. It is an
important topic with how diverse the Norwegian classes are becoming, but I am doing it for
my own learning and growing into the topic I am super interested in.
Research question:
How does Norwegian schools (or teachers) adapt their English subject/teaching/education
for pupils with Norwegian as their second language to fit teaching and differentiated
instruction requirements stated in the Norwegian curriculum?
Theoretical underpinning:
Differentiated instruction are a requirement in Norwegian schools for each and every pupil
there is. There are both the core elements/values of the Norwegian (Utdaningsdirektoratet,
2022) and Tomlinson’s theoretical framework and model of differentiated structure
(Tomlinson, 2010). Both of these gives us an understanding of what is required of teachers to
differentiate each lecture.
Another resource to look at is the CEFR “Common European Framework of Reference for
Languages”. This framework gives us a guide to language instruction and language
proficiency levels (Council of Europe, 2001).
This research examines variations in language learners, covering topics such as language
aptitude, motivation, learner strategies, and styles, with a focus on recent research
developments and concluding with discussions on conceptual and methodological issues in
Individual Differences research) (Skehan, 1991)
Sources:
Council of Europe. (2001). COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE FOR
og-trivsel/tilpasset-opplaring/
Sumeyye Sener