Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ImportanceofBiologyforEngineers ACaseStudy
ImportanceofBiologyforEngineers ACaseStudy
A Case Study
Abstract The field of biological sciences has grown multitude in the past decade
to address real-life challenges and industrial innovations to cater to the needs of
society. Different biological phenomena can be approximated in terms of physical
processes of mechanical work, electrical signals, and chemical energy. Considering
the immense importance that biology and life-sciences hold for humankind, simpli-
fication of complex biological phenomena is a must for imparting greater under-
standing to multidisciplinary researchers. Therefore, many Universities have diver-
sified their undergraduate bioscience program to include interdisciplinary courses
focusing on biomechanics, bioinformatics, nanobiotechnology, and many more.
Together with the study aspect, research is also being conducted in the diverse
research areas of biotechnology. Keeping sustainability and co-existence in mind,
students and engineers should be trained to initiate better innovations and contribute
their ideas for protecting the ecosystem around them.
1 Introduction
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 97
H. B. Kaushik et al. (eds.), Trends in Teaching-Learning Technologies,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4874-1_8
98 C. Panda et al.
Inspired by nature, many new devices have been modeled to quench human needs
at the nano and macro scale. Mimicking the beauty of nature, many innovative
inventions have been developed, which continues to be a booming area in biology.
Many such models include the development of super-hydrophobic surface cleaners
inspired by lotus leaves, and swimming dresses [6]. Many models implement
strategies inspired by sharkskin, neural computers, adherent suits by lizards feet
structure, self-healing materials, etc. It is, however, complicated to put these ideas to
Importance of Biology for Engineers: A Case Study 99
Implementation
Engineering Ideas Biological Process (a). Drug delivery
1. Mechanical Work (i). Muscle Assembly (b). Bioprosthetics
2. Electronic system (ii). Signal Transduction (c). Biosensors
3. Electrical Signal (iii). Neurotransmission (d). Biopesticides
4. Chemical Energy (iv). Enzyme catalysis (e). Organ-on-Chip
(f). Universal Health
Record
Fig. 1 Engineering ideas being approximated in relation to biological processes and their
implementation for the society
use unless thorough knowledge of biology exists. Electrical engineers have played
a significant role in circuit design that produce current pulses to depolarize and
activate neurons in the retinal network to trigger neural activity in a blind person.
2.2 Biosensors
Detection of a particular molecule in a mixture has become more precise and accu-
rate with the help of biosensors. In the era of quick and precise detection systems,
bionanotechnolgy has become a boon to point-of-care system development. Biosen-
sors have been extensively used in the quality control boards in measuring the purity
of the sample, ensuring that only chemical safe and feasible products are available
to the customers. The principle of biosensors works on the interaction between the
analyte molecule and the enzyme that helps in accurate quantification [7]. With a
combined knowledge of biology and electronics, it could be an added advantage in
the production of an effective biosensor.
DNA detection from the crime site has been used extensively for paternity testing.
DNA chips or microarrays have been used for identifying DNA specific to a particular
probe. This technology has developed further only during the last 40 years after the
production and involvement of fluorescent-based detection for the quantitation of
DNA. Genomics and bioinformatics techniques have enabled easier development of
personalized precision medicine, lead selection, and computer-aided drug discovery.
The use of AI, together with mathematical modeling, molecular dynamics simula-
tions, and new scientific breakthroughs has provided a cross-cutting technology to
take biology to the next dimension of understanding. It has been made easy for data
100 C. Panda et al.
Universities across the globe have diversified their undergraduate programs in biolog-
ical engineering to include interdisciplinary courses such as biomedical studies,
bioinformatics, artificial intelligence, DNA fingerprinting, neural networking,
nanobiotechnology, nanofluidics, and many more as shown in Fig. 2. With an overall
goal of attracting like-minded enthusiast students, such real-world application-
oriented programs could be a boon to society [9]. Compared to the rest of the country,
North-East India has limited yet prominent institutes focused on research in the inter-
disciplinary aspects of biology. Northeastern Regional institutes offer masters and
doctorate programs in bioinformatics, and pharmacology along with allied research
on chemoinformatics. In addition, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Guwa-
hati, Assam, houses the biosciences and bioengineering department, providing UG/
PG education programs focusing on the multidisciplinary angle of biotechnology.
Together with the study aspect, research is also being conducted in diverse research
areas of nanobiotechnology, environmental sciences, healthcare sciences, system
biology, nanomaterials, and biochemistry. Further, as an initiative to cater to the
Importance of Biology for Engineers: A Case Study 101
needs of scientists and engineers, centers have been set up at IIT Guwahati with
a vision to enhance research and innovation in the field of biological sciences and
healthcare engineering in the northeast region.
In addition to the above initiatives at undergraduate and postgraduate levels, many
online courses are also being made available. NPTEL and Swayam courses as funded
by MHRD, Govt. of India, offer diverse courses in the fields of science and engi-
neering. These courses are open to all groups of individuals from students, faculty
to industry experts across different disciplines. Many basic-level courses are offered
in biology that the engineering students could enroll in order to get a better insight
into the fundamentals of biology. IIT Guwahati also offers courses like the basics of
biology covering the origin of life, ecology, physiology, cell biology, and biological
systems. Any engineer, irrespective of the parent discipline might consider using
multidisciplinary skills in biology toward designing/improving biological systems
in the future. Such courses convey the essentials of cell and molecular biology to
provide a framework for more specific understanding, and contribution to the biolog-
ical revolution. Diverse concepts of gene cloning, genetics, developmental biology,
evolution, and proteomics have also been discussed in other relevant courses. These
courses explain how engineers and clinicians could collaborate effectively to solve
a range of societal problems.
Sustainable
Agriculture
Application- Alternate
oriented Renewable
Education Energy
Biomedical
Bioremediation
Engineering
Prosthetics &
Nano Drug Biosensors
Delivery
Bioinformatics
& AI
Fig. 2 Focus areas of bioengineering for the cause of well-being and sustainability
102 C. Panda et al.
4.2 Observations
Out of the total population surveyed, 66.7% of individuals were students, with more
than 65% from non-life-sciences (biotechnology) backgrounds, as indicated in Fig. 3.
Around 95.2% of the participants have studied basic biology during their class X
(10th) in their secondary school. However, the number dropped only to 43.7% in the
higher secondary school, as shown in Fig. 4a. Around 21.4% of the participants have
not opted for mathematics in their class XII (12th). An equal percentage of partici-
pants had studied both mathematics and biology during their XII. This data indicates
that students have majorly diverted toward studying mathematics over biology, which
accounts for up to 57.1% (Fig. 4d). The main reason for this diversion could be the
limited number of seats, high competition, and the craze for engineering among
peers. It could also be associated with difficulty in understanding the concepts in-
depth. Based on the data obtained, 27% of the participants felt that they were more
interested in learning mathematics than biology. However, around 38% of individuals
felt the subjects were lengthy, or the curriculum not to be appropriately designed.
Despite this drastic difference in priority, more than 88.1% of the participants still
find biology to be interesting.
Excluding those participants who have chosen biology or biotechnology for their
graduate studies, a vast majority of the others have not studied any subject related
to biology in their undergraduate level. Such a statistical data indicates that Univer-
sities across India have not considered including subjects related to biology in their
curriculum for the undergraduates. There might be certain exceptions, but still, it
shows a lack of interdisciplinary education for engineers. A significant number of
Importance of Biology for Engineers: A Case Study 103
33%
67%
34%
66%
2%
29% 33%
36%
(a)
(b)
(c)
39%
33%
22%
2% 4%
(d)
Participant's history of exposure to biology during higher
secondary level education
21%
57%
22%
Importance of Biology for Engineers: A Case Study 105
◄Fig. 4 a Exposure to biology during secondary education level. b The major output of the survey
indicating the interest in interdisciplinary research, feasibility of a short-term non-degree course, and
the applicability of life-sciences in future. c The overall interest of the participant toward learning
biology. d Participant’s history of learning biology and mathematics during higher secondary (class
12th) education level
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Importance of Biology for Engineers: A Case Study 107
◄Fig. 5 a Answer to the question about the helpfulness of biology in the future to all the participants,
when compared to their biology-focused educational background, and their interest in interdisci-
plinary approach. b Answer to the question about the inclusion of life-science-related subjects in
the engineering curriculum. c Answer to the question for the feasibility of a short-term professional-
non-degree course on life-science-related topic(s) for engineers. d About 76% of bachelor’s and
master’s, along with 83% of the doctorate students favor the inclusion of a short-term professional
course covering the life-science-related topic(s). In all the images, the first groups are considered
as groups for comparison. Here all the responses are considered as the sample space. * p < 0.05, **
p < 0.01, ns: non-significant
Further analysis was performed from the data input by all the participants using
the GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), and values were
represented as the arithmetic means ± SEM. Assuming the residual distribution to be
Gaussian, one-way ANOVA was performed. For this analysis, Brown-Forsythe and
Welch ANOVA test was performed followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison
for inter-group differences. Statistical significance was set at 95% confidence interval
with p values set as */# ≤ 0.05, **/## ≤ 0.01.
Considering the answers to the questions of “inclusion of life-science-related
subjects in engineering curriculum,” and “feasibility of a short-term professional-
non-degree course on life-science-related topic(s)” as the major outcomes of the
study, a correlation between the educational background, discipline, and partici-
pant’s opinion about life-sciences and interdisciplinary approach can be approxi-
mated. Moreover, on basis of profession (as working professionals) or education level
(masters, bachelor, or doctorate), separate group-wise analysis can also be performed.
Around 76% of bachelors, and masters students were in favor of including a short-
term professional course covering the life-science-related topic(s). The number
stands at 83% for doctoral students (Fig. 5d). There could be a strong correlation
between the interdisciplinary approach and participants’ opinions favoring the inclu-
sion of diverse short-term courses. This trend is observed in the case of masters and
doctoral students, whereas out of the 17% of participants who favored traditional
domain-focused research belonged mostly to the bachelor’s student group. Prob-
ably working professionals favored the inclusion of short courses (online or offline),
which were deemed essential for their skill development (Fig. 6d). Even with the
group having no life-sciences background, a strong interest in biological science-
related research was observed with over 60% of the participants from this group
supporting such a bridging course for engineers (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, Pearson’s
correlation coefficient for all observation groups was calculated with a two-tailed p-
value approach by keeping the confidence interval at 99%. The values in the form of
a matrix are provided in Table 1. There exists a negative observable pattern (negative
correlation) of −0.03 between the feasibility of a short-term course and the partici-
pants having biology in their class X. It should be kept in mind that with a negative
108 C. Panda et al.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Importance of Biology for Engineers: A Case Study 109
◄Fig. 6 a Answer to the question about the helpfulness of biology in the future to the participants
of non-life-sciences (biotechnology) discipline, when compared to their individual biology-related
previous educational background, and their interest in interdisciplinary research. b Answer to the
question of the feasibility of a short-term professional-non-degree course on life-science-related
topic(s) by participants of non-life-sciences discipline. c Answer to the question of the helpfulness
of biology in the future to the working professional group. d Answer to the question about the
feasibility of a short-term professional-non-degree course on life-science-related topic(s) by the
working professional group. In all the images, the first groups are considered as groups for compar-
ison. Here, the responses from the non-life-sciences background were considered for parts a & b,
whereas only participants from the working profession were considered as sample space for c & d.
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ns: non-significant
Table 1 Pearson’s correlation matrix for major parameters used in this study
Biology Biology Biology in Interdisciplinary Feasibility Helpfulness
in Class in Class Graduation Interest of of biology
X XII level short-term in life
life-sciences
course(s)
Biology in Class 1 0.19 0.12 0.09 −0.03 0.21
X
Biology in Class 0.19 1 0.59 0.19 0.23 0.26
XII
Biology in 0.12 0.59 1 0.28 0.14 0.18
graduation level
Interdisciplinary 0.09 0.19 0.28 1 0.26 0.43
interest
Feasibility of −0.03 0.23 0.14 0.26 1 0.29
short-term
life-sciences
course(s)
Helpfulness of 0.21 0.26 0.18 0.43 0.29 1
biology in life
correlation constant, if one value increases, then the other value will decrease, and
vice versa. In other words, a positive value represents a direct relation, while a 0
indicates no correlation at all.
5 Conclusion
The study of biology has helped in shaping the quality of life by providing solutions
to large-scale problems of the world. It paves the way for new scientific inventions
and discoveries that could make life easier and contribute to a very healthy biosphere.
An understanding of biology could address concerns of the modern world regarding
110 C. Panda et al.
pollution reduction, procuring greener energy sources, managing food shortages, and
finding treatment for deadly diseases. Ensuring that biology is included in secondary
school education is important so that children are aware of their surroundings and
understand the process that drives life on Earth. It is necessary to inculcate this
knowledge into children, so that they can use it in the future to bring better innovations
and contribute to protecting the ecosystem around them.
Biology has a broader scope of having importance in numerous disciplines like
bioremediation, food processing, agriculture, forensics, energy production, phar-
maceuticals, bio-sensing, gene editing, pest control, pollution control, and many
more. Recent advances in this field have focused on protein analysis and charac-
terization from novel sources, biodegradation, antibiotic production, metagenomics,
nanoparticles in drug delivery, neural imaging, bioceramics, and tissue culture along
with 3D printing. Further, the covid-19 pandemic that shook the whole world and
brought all works to stand still is the best case study to analyze how biology has
played a significant role in transitioning through this phase. Virologists from various
research institutes started with the genome sequencing of the SARS-COV2 virus
strain that kept mutating repeatedly. With the help of advanced computational tech-
niques and metagenomic studies, several vaccine candidates against the virus were
developed. Biomedical systems and point-of-care devices have helped immensely in
satisfactorily diagnosing the disease.
From the survey conducted across a diverse population of students and working
professionals, it was figured out that though about 96% of participants had basic
biology during their secondary school, the number decreased to about 44% during
higher secondary education. The lack of an appropriate curriculum during graduate
studies regarding interdisciplinary biology might be linked to low research output in
such multidisciplinary areas. With observations from the survey, it was concluded that
the possibility of short-term non-degree courses or MOOCs can cater to the needs
of the students and working professionals from diverse backgrounds interested in
pursuing interdisciplinary research.
Further, from an educational point of view, it is necessary to inculcate the
interdisciplinary way of research and innovation into engineers through non-
degree short courses to address the challenges of the near future such as climate
change, sustainability, disease spreading pattern, genetic editing, species extinction,
multidrug-resistant pathogenic strain development, resource depletion, etc. Keeping
sustainability and co-existence in mind, students and engineers should be trained
to initiate better innovations and contribute their ideas for protecting the ecosystem
around them [10].
Importance of Biology for Engineers: A Case Study 111
References
1. Breithaupt, H. (2006). The engineers approach to biology. EMBO Reports, 7(1), 21–23. https:/
/doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400607
2. Brent, R. (2004). A partnership between biology and engineering. Nature Biotechnology, 22,
1211–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1004-1211
3. Schuster, B., Junkin, M., Kashaf, S. S., Romero-Calvo, I., Kirby, K., Matthews, J., Tay, S.,
et al. (2020). Automated microfluidic platform for dynamic and combinatorial drug screening
of tumor organoids. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-
19058-4
4. Quesada-González, D., & Merkoçi, A. (2018). Nanomaterial-based devices for point-of-care
diagnostic applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 47(13), 4697–4709. https://doi.org/10.
1039/C7CS00837F
5. Li, W., Pei, Y., Zhang, C., & Kottapalli, A. G. P. (2021). Bioinspired designs and biomimetic
applications of triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy, 84, 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.nanoen.2021.105865
6. Tsiapalis, D., De Pieri, A., Biggs, M., Pandit, A., & Zeugolis, D. I. (2017). Biomimetic bioac-
tive biomaterials: The next generation of implantable devices. ACS Biomaterials Science and
Engineering, 3(7), 1172–1174. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00372
7. Cho, I. H., Kim, D. H., & Park, S. (2020). Electrochemical biosensors: Perspective on functional
nanomaterials for on-site analysis. Biomaterials Research, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s40824-019-0181-y
8. Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Hassabis, D.,
et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 596(7873),
583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
9. Raman, R., Mitchell, M., Perez-Pinera, P., Bashir, R., & DeStefano, L. (2016). Design and
integration of a problem-based biofabrication course into an undergraduate biomedical engi-
neering curriculum. Journal of Biological Engineering, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13
036-016-0032-5
10. French, K. E. (2019). Harnessing synthetic biology for sustainable development. Nature
Sustainability, 2(4), 250–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0270-x