Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Program Planning
Program Planning
Department
PREVENTIVE SERVICES
Immunizations
Communicable disease control
Health screening
Women's health services
Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program
Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) programs
In urban areas, these types of services have traditionally been performed by public health
departments. In smaller rural communities, services such as clinical services, health screening,
women's health, EPSDT, immunizations, and the like, are often carried out in the primary care
clinic. While the regulatory, educational, and planning components of the public health mission
are the domain of the public health department, the entire community should be a part of the
planning and decision-making process concerning these activities.
This model assumes that economies of scale are the primary variable in service delivery and does
not take into consideration factors such as geography or the ability (or necessity) to perform
traditional public health department functions through alternative mechanisms. In rural areas,
which do not have a large population base, these alternative mechanisms are often critical.
OTTAWA COUNTY SERVICES:
The Ottawa County Public Health Department provides a range of public health services. This
agency is tax supported and located in Minneapolis. The Public Health Department employed a
total of 15 people in 4.1 full time equivalent positions in 1994. In addition to the services
provided by employees, some services are offered through contract. The services which are
provided are listed in Table 21.
UTILIZATION:
Table 21 Public Health Visits by Program
Health Department Services Number of Visits Percent of Total
Other 48 1.0%
EPSDT 46 0.9%
Next to School Health, Adult Health visits constitute the second most frequent type of patient
care for the Ottawa County Public Health Department.
With the exception of School Health, this agency primarily serves the very young and the elderly
in the county.
Over 50% of the 1994 revenue for the health department came from public funds in the form of
the county mil levy.
20% of the 1994 revenues came from grants - many of which also come from the state and federal
governments.
The only other source of funds for this agency in 1994 was the Medicaid program and what fees
could be collected from clients who were not covered by categorical grants or the Medicaid
program.
The Ottawa County Public Health Department was commended for its services and the caring
attitude of its personnel. This was particularly evident in the communities outside Minneapolis.
The health department was described by other providers as cooperative and in need of additional
resources.
The Hospice program of the health department was described as an important community
resource.
Ottawa County is under served with rural water districts, which means many of the rural residents
are on private wells.
Some areas of the county are remote and distant from access to health services - they are only
served by the health department.
The county has a high teenage pregnancy rate.
Low income families that are not eligible for public funds do not access care when they should
and when they do, the care they need is more costly.
Broaden the county-wide immunization program to more sites in smaller communities.
Medicare certification for Hospice is very important for the community.
More information on AIDs prevention and care including a support system for those people in the
community caring for AIDs patients is needed.
Develop an immunization tracking system so records in various immunization sites can be
coordinated (i.e., MD Offices and the Health Department).
Dispel the myth that the Health Department is part of SRS.
Community education on immunizations and adequate nutrition for kids is needed.
The pregnancy issues of unmarried or adolescent women need to be addressed.
Unsafe water supplies and improper septic waste disposal are threats to the local system of health
care.
Example 2: Community Concerns: Community Health Concerns Ottawa
County, KS
BACKGROUND:
Ottawa County received a grant from the Kansas Health Foundation to explore how health
services might be improved. Part of this grant is designed to encourage community-based health
promotion. The first step in this process involves identifying community health concerns. A
small group of citizens developed a survey on community health issues encountered by Ottawa
County citizens.
The survey was sent out to all households in the County (approximately 2,500). In addition, the
survey was printed on an entire page of the local newspaper (circulation approximately 1,600).
Surveys were hand-distributed to numerous sites in the County, including Senior Centers,
business clubs (such as the VFW and Lions), at the local hospital and Emergency Medical
Service site, and at a festival in Minneapolis, the county seat. The county has a population of
approximately 5,500 persons. Citizens returned 593 surveys, for a response rate of 11%.
In the survey, people were asked to rate how important each issue was, and how satisfied they
were with how the issue was being addressed in the County. An example question is included
below:
Importance of the Satisfaction with the community's
Issue efforts
Ver
Not Not Very
y
Relative Strengths:The surveys were collected, entered into a database, and analyzed to determine a)
what issues were important to citizens of the county, and b) how satisfied citizens were with how the
county deals with these important issues. There were 27 community health issues in the survey.
Items with high importance and satisfaction ratings are considered strengths -- they're important,
and the community is doing a good job in dealing with them. The issue in the above example
emerged as a relative strength in Ottawa County:
Importance of the Satisfaction with the community's
Issue efforts
84%
93%
Of people who filled out the survey, there was a 93% average rating on the importance scale (it
would be 100% if all respondents rated it very important). There was an 84% satisfaction rating
with the community's efforts on this topic. This is high compared to satisfaction ratings on other
items.
Implications. Why are citizens satisfied with aspects of the community that received high
ratings? Are these strengths at risk? Are subgroups of citizens dissatisfied with efforts in this
area? Listening sessions around the community can help answer these and other important
questions about the relative strengths in Ottawa County.
Vaccinations are available and 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
affordable.
40%
81%
Of people who filled out the survey, there was an 81% average rating on the importance scale.
There was a 40% satisfaction rating (If all people gave it the lowest possible score, the
satisfaction rating would be 0%). This rating of 40% is low compared to other issues on the
survey.
Implications: Why are these aspects of the community (like recycling) considered to be
problems? What might be done to work with others in the community to improve issues that are
considered problems? Listening sessions around the community can help answer these and other
important questions about the relative problems in Ottawa County.
Future Directions:
Using these data on the strengths and problems of community health issues in the County,
citizens may wish to set up committees or task forces to address one or several of the most
burning issues. Listening sessions will provide potential solutions to some of the problems. Task
forces may wish to do more systematic "strategic planning" around some issues. Community
citizens can be recruited to work on problems of most interest to them
Relative Strenghts
Average Average
Item Survey Question
Importance Satisfaction
Relative Problems
Average Average
Item Survey Question
Importance Satisfaction