M.

Sc Psychology II Year
Course – 09 : Research Methodology

Answers for two examination papers

prepared by

Ch.Srinivasa Chakrapani
Linux System Administrator,
LIC of India, Khammam
Tutor in Arithmetic and Reasoning
Legal Counsellor and Legal Document writer
9505360659

1
 FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

M.Sc.II Year Second Spell Examination, January -2023

Subject – 35: PSYCHOLOGY
Course – 09 : Research Methodology

Time : 3 Hours] [Max.Marks : 70

[Min.Marks : 28
SECTION – A

[Marks : 4 x 10 =40]
Instructions to the candidates:

a) Answer any four of the following questions in about 40 lines each.

b) Each question carries 10 marks.

1) What is scientific method? Discuss various elements in scientific

method.
In the field of research methodology, the scientific method refers to the
systematic and logical approach used by researchers to conduct scientific
investigations, gather evidence, and generate knowledge. It involves a series
of steps and processes that guide researchers in formulating research
questions, designing studies, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing
valid conclusions. The scientific method ensures that research is conducted
in a rigorous and objective manner, allowing for the replication and
verification of findings. Here are the various elements of the scientific
method in the context of research methodology:

1. Observation: The scientific method begins with careful observation and

identification of a phenomenon or a problem. Researchers observe and
gather information about the topic of interest, which helps in identifying
research gaps, formulating research questions, and developing hypotheses.
2. Literature Review: Before conducting a study, researchers review existing
literature and research related to the topic. This step helps in gaining a

2
 comprehensive understanding of the research area, identifying gaps or
inconsistencies in previous studies, and building a theoretical foundation for
the research.
3. Formulating Research Questions or Hypotheses: Based on the observations
and literature review, researchers formulate research questions or
hypotheses. Research questions are broad inquiries that aim to explore a
specific topic, while hypotheses are specific statements that make
predictions about the relationship between variables.
4. Research Design: Researchers carefully design the research study, including
selecting the appropriate research method, defining the population or
sample, determining the variables to be measured, and outlining the
procedures for data collection and analysis. The research design should be
well-planned and structured to ensure validity and reliability.
5. Data Collection: Researchers collect relevant data based on the research
design. This may involve surveys, interviews, experiments, observations, or
other methods. Data collection procedures should be systematic,
standardized, and aligned with the research objectives and research
questions.
6. Data Analysis: Once the data is collected, researchers analyze it using
appropriate statistical or qualitative analysis techniques. The goal is to
interpret and make sense of the data, identify patterns or relationships, and
draw meaningful conclusions.
7. Drawing Conclusions and Making Inferences: Based on the data analysis,
researchers draw conclusions and make inferences about the research
questions or hypotheses. Conclusions should be supported by evidence and
data, and researchers should acknowledge any limitations or uncertainties
in their findings.
8. Reporting and Communication: Researchers document and report their
findings in a structured manner, following the guidelines of the research

3
 discipline or the specific journal. This involves writing a research report or
publishing a scientific paper that provides a detailed account of the study,
including the research questions, methods, findings, and implications.

The scientific method in research methodology emphasizes objectivity,

systematic inquiry, and the use of evidence to generate knowledge. It
ensures that research is conducted in a systematic, transparent, and
replicable manner, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the
field.

2) Explain about the various non-experimental research.

In research methodology, non-experimental research refers to studies that
do not involve the manipulation of variables or the establishment of cause-
and-effect relationships. These types of research designs focus on observing
and describing phenomena as they naturally occur, without intervention or
control by the researcher. Non-experimental research is commonly used
when it is not feasible or ethical to manipulate variables or when the
research aims to explore relationships, describe behaviors, or understand
complex phenomena. Here are some common types of non-experimental
research:

1. Descriptive Research: Descriptive research aims to describe and document

the characteristics, behaviors, or attitudes of a specific group or population.
It involves collecting data without manipulating variables. Surveys,
questionnaires, interviews, and observations are commonly used to gather
data for descriptive research. The findings provide a snapshot of the current
state of the variables of interest.
2. Correlational Research: Correlational research examines the relationship
between two or more variables. It seeks to determine whether changes in
one variable are associated with changes in another variable. Correlation

4
 does not imply causation, but it helps identify patterns and associations.
Correlational studies use statistical techniques to analyze data and calculate
correlation coefficients. The findings provide information about the degree
and direction of the relationship between variables.
3. Observational Research: Observational research involves direct observation
and recording of behaviors or events in their natural setting. Researchers do
not intervene or manipulate variables but rather observe and document
behaviors, interactions, or phenomena. This type of research can be
conducted through structured observations, participant observations, or
naturalistic observations. Observational research provides rich qualitative or
quantitative data about behaviors and contexts.
4. Comparative Research: Comparative research involves comparing different
groups, populations, or settings to identify similarities, differences, or
relationships. Researchers select and compare groups based on specific
characteristics or variables of interest. Comparative research can involve
cross-sectional designs (data collected at a specific point in time) or
longitudinal designs (data collected over an extended period). It helps to
understand variations across groups or contexts.
5. Survey Research: Survey research involves collecting data from a sample of
individuals or groups through structured questionnaires or interviews.
Surveys are used to gather information about opinions, attitudes, behaviors,
or characteristics of a specific population. The data collected can be
analyzed using statistical techniques to identify trends, patterns, or
relationships.
6. Case Study Research: Case study research involves in-depth investigation
and analysis of a specific individual, group, or organization. Researchers
gather detailed information about the case through various methods such as
interviews, observations, document analysis, or archival research. Case

5
 studies provide rich and detailed insights into complex phenomena and are
often used to examine unique or rare cases.

Non-experimental research designs have their strengths and limitations.

They provide valuable insights into real-world contexts, allow for the
exploration of relationships, and offer a deeper understanding of complex
phenomena. However, they do not establish cause-and-effect relationships
and are susceptible to biases and confounding variables. Researchers need
to carefully consider the appropriateness of non-experimental designs based
on their research questions, resources, and ethical considerations.

3) Discuss about the characteristics of a Problem.

In research methodology, a problem refers to a specific issue, question, or
concern that serves as the basis for a research study. Identifying and
defining a clear problem is crucial for conducting meaningful research. Here
are some key characteristics of a problem in research methodology:

1. Relevance: A research problem should be relevant and significant to the field

of study. It should address a gap in knowledge, contribute to existing
theories, or provide practical implications. The problem should have
relevance to the research community, stakeholders, or society as a whole.
2. Clarity: The problem statement should be clear, concise, and specific. It
should define the research focus and scope. A clear problem statement
enables researchers to formulate research questions or hypotheses and
design appropriate research methods to address the problem.
3. Specificity: The problem should be specific rather than broad or vague. A
well-defined problem helps in focusing the research and determining the
appropriate methodology. It should identify the variables, concepts, or
phenomena under investigation.

6
4. Feasibility: The problem should be feasible in terms of available resources,
time, and ethical considerations. Researchers need to assess the practicality
of conducting the research and ensure that the necessary data, methods,
and participants are accessible.
5. Novelty: A good research problem often involves exploring new areas,
extending existing knowledge, or challenging existing theories. It should be
unique and offer something new to the field. Novelty encourages intellectual
curiosity and contributes to the advancement of knowledge.
6. Measurability: The problem should be measurable, meaning that it should
allow for the collection of data and the application of research methods to
obtain valid and reliable results. Measurable problems enable researchers to
test hypotheses, analyze data, and draw meaningful conclusions.
7. Significance: The problem should have significance and implications beyond
the immediate research context. It should address important research
questions, provide insights into practical issues, or contribute to theoretical
frameworks. Significance ensures that the research has broader
implications and adds value to the field.
8. Researchable: The problem should be researchable, meaning that it can be
effectively investigated using appropriate research methods and tools.
Researchers should consider the availability of data sources, research
designs, ethical considerations, and the feasibility of data collection and
analysis.

Identifying and defining a research problem is often the first step in the
research process. It sets the stage for formulating research questions,
designing the study, collecting data, and drawing conclusions. A well-
defined problem guides the entire research process and helps ensure that
the study addresses meaningful and relevant issues.

4) What is a hypothesis? Elaborate on the types of hypothesis.

7
 In research methodology, a hypothesis is a tentative statement or
proposition that suggests a possible explanation for a phenomenon or a
relationship between variables. It serves as a starting point for empirical
investigation and guides the research process. Hypotheses are formulated
based on existing knowledge, theories, or observations and are subject to
empirical testing. They help researchers make predictions and provide a
framework for designing research studies and analyzing data.

Types of Hypotheses:

1. Research or Scientific Hypothesis: A research hypothesis is a statement that

predicts the relationship between variables or the expected outcome of a
study. It is based on the research question and aims to provide a specific
and testable prediction. For example, "There is a positive relationship
between exercise and mental well-being."
2. Null Hypothesis (H0): The null hypothesis states that there is no significant
relationship or difference between variables. It assumes that any observed
differences or relationships are due to chance or random variation. It is
denoted as H0 and is often used as a default position in statistical testing.
Researchers aim to reject the null hypothesis based on empirical evidence to
support the alternative hypothesis.
3. Alternative Hypothesis (H1 or Ha): The alternative hypothesis is a statement
that contradicts or negates the null hypothesis. It suggests the presence of a
significant relationship or difference between variables. Researchers aim to
provide evidence to support the alternative hypothesis and reject the null
hypothesis. It can be directional, indicating the expected direction of the
relationship (e.g., "There is a positive relationship"), or non-directional (e.g.,
"There is a difference").
4. Statistical Hypothesis: A statistical hypothesis is a hypothesis that is
formulated for statistical testing. It involves specifying the null and

8
 alternative hypotheses and determining the appropriate statistical test to
evaluate the hypotheses. Statistical hypotheses often involve parameters,
sample data, and assumptions about the population.
5. Composite Hypothesis: A composite hypothesis combines multiple
statements or conditions. It may involve multiple variables or multiple
comparisons. Researchers formulate composite hypotheses when they want
to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously or examine complex
relationships.
6. Simple Hypothesis: A simple hypothesis involves a single statement or
condition. It focuses on a single variable or a single relationship between
variables. Simple hypotheses are often straightforward to test and analyze.

It is important to note that hypotheses are subject to empirical testing and

can be either supported or rejected based on the evidence. The research
process involves collecting data, analyzing it using appropriate statistical
techniques, and drawing conclusions about the hypotheses. Hypotheses
play a critical role in research methodology as they guide the research
design, data collection, and data analysis, helping researchers explore and
understand relationships between variables.

5) Explain different types to interview.

n research methodology, interviews are a common data collection method
used to gather information directly from participants. Interviews allow
researchers to obtain in-depth insights, perspectives, and experiences from
individuals or groups. There are different types of interviews that
researchers can use, depending on the research objectives, the nature of the
research topic, and the desired level of structure in the interview process.
Here are some commonly used types of interviews in research methodology:

9
1. Structured Interviews: Structured interviews involve a predetermined set of
standardized questions that are asked to all participants in the same order.
The questions are designed to elicit specific information, and the interviewer
follows a strict format. Structured interviews are highly standardized,
allowing for easy comparison and quantitative analysis of responses. They
are commonly used in surveys or quantitative research studies.
2. Semi-Structured Interviews: Semi-structured interviews provide a balance
between structure and flexibility. The interviewer has a list of pre-
determined questions or topics but also has the freedom to probe deeper
and ask follow-up questions based on the participant's responses. This type
of interview allows for more in-depth exploration of the participant's
experiences and perspectives. The order and wording of questions may vary
across interviews, but the general themes remain consistent.
3. Unstructured Interviews: Unstructured interviews are open-ended and
flexible. They do not follow a fixed set of questions, allowing the interviewer
to explore various topics and delve into the participant's thoughts and
experiences in a more conversational manner. Unstructured interviews
provide rich qualitative data but can be time-consuming and require skilled
interviewers to guide the conversation effectively.
4. Informal or Casual Conversational Interviews: Informal interviews involve
more relaxed and informal conversations with participants. These interviews
can occur naturally during casual encounters or informal settings. The
interviewer engages in friendly conversation and asks questions as they
arise, without a strict structure or predetermined set of questions. Informal
interviews can provide valuable insights in certain research contexts, such
as ethnographic studies or exploratory research.
5. Group Interviews: Group interviews, also known as focus group discussions,
involve multiple participants who are interviewed together in a group
setting. The interviewer facilitates the discussion, asking questions and

10
 encouraging participants to share their perspectives and interact with one
another. Group interviews can provide diverse viewpoints, encourage
participants to build on each other's ideas, and generate rich data through
group dynamics and interactions.
6. Virtual or Online Interviews: With advancements in technology, virtual or
online interviews have become increasingly popular. These interviews are
conducted remotely using video conferencing tools or online platforms.
Virtual interviews offer flexibility in terms of geographic location and can be
convenient for both researchers and participants. They can be structured,
semi-structured, or unstructured, similar to face-to-face interviews.

The choice of interview type depends on the research objectives, the nature
of the research topic, the desired level of structure, and the available
resources. Researchers should carefully consider the advantages and
limitations of each interview type and select the most appropriate method
that aligns with their research goals and the needs of their participants.

6) Differentiate between the three types of variables.

In research methodology, variables are factors or characteristics that can
vary and have an impact on the study's outcomes. There are three main
types of variables: independent variables, dependent variables, and control
variables. Here's a breakdown of each type:

1. Independent Variables: Independent variables are factors that are

manipulated or controlled by the researcher. They are the presumed causes
or influences on the dependent variable. In experimental research, the
researcher deliberately changes the values or levels of the independent
variable to observe the effect on the dependent variable. The independent
variable is the variable that the researcher believes has an impact on the
outcome of the study. For example, in a study examining the effect of

11
 studying time on exam scores, the independent variable would be the
amount of time spent studying. The researcher can manipulate this variable
by assigning participants to different groups with varying study time
durations.
2. Dependent Variables: Dependent variables are the outcomes or responses
that are measured or observed in the research study. They are the variables
that are expected to change or be influenced by the independent variable(s).
The dependent variable is the variable that the researcher is interested in
studying and analyzing to determine if and how it is affected by the
independent variable. In the previous example, the dependent variable
would be the participants' exam scores. The researcher would measure and
compare the exam scores across the different groups with varying study
time durations to assess the impact of the independent variable.
3. Control Variables: Control variables are factors that are held constant or
controlled by the researcher to minimize their potential influence on the
relationship between the independent and dependent variables. These
variables are not of primary interest but are taken into account to ensure
that any observed effects are due to the independent variable(s) rather than
other extraneous factors. Control variables help researchers isolate the
relationship between the independent and dependent variables by reducing
the possibility of confounding or third-variable effects. For example, in the
study on studying time and exam scores, the researcher might control
factors such as the participants' prior knowledge, study techniques, and
environmental conditions to ensure that any differences in exam scores can
be attributed to the varying study time and not these other factors.

Differentiating between these three types of variables is important for

understanding the relationships and dynamics within a research study. The
independent variable is the factor that is manipulated, the dependent
variable is the outcome being measured or observed, and the control

12
 variables are the factors held constant to ensure accurate interpretation of
the relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

7) Briefly discuss any four non-probability sampling methods.

Non-probability sampling methods are techniques used in research
methodology when it is not feasible or practical to select a random sample
from the target population. While these methods do not provide the same
level of representativeness and generalizability as probability sampling
methods, they are often used in qualitative research or when specific
subgroups need to be targeted. Here are four commonly used non-
probability sampling methods:

1. Convenience Sampling: Convenience sampling involves selecting

participants who are readily available and accessible to the researcher. This
method is convenient and quick, as participants are chosen based on their
convenience or proximity to the researcher. For example, interviewing people
at a shopping mall or surveying students in a particular classroom.
However, convenience sampling may introduce bias, as it does not ensure
the representation of the entire population of interest.
2. Purposive Sampling: Purposive sampling, also known as judgmental
sampling, involves hand-picking participants who possess specific
characteristics or traits that align with the research objectives. The
researcher deliberately selects individuals who are considered
knowledgeable or experienced in the area of interest. This method allows for
targeted and focused data collection, but it may limit the diversity of
perspectives and introduce bias based on the researcher's judgment.
3. Snowball Sampling: Snowball sampling is a technique used to identify and
recruit participants who are part of a specific population or have specific
characteristics. The initial participants are selected through convenience or
purposive sampling, and then they assist the researcher in identifying and

13
 referring other potential participants. This method is particularly useful
when the target population is difficult to reach or is characterized by a
hidden or hard-to-find nature, such as drug users or marginalized
communities.
4. Quota Sampling: Quota sampling involves setting specific quotas for certain
characteristics or subgroups within the target population. The researcher
selects participants based on predefined quotas to ensure a proportional
representation of certain characteristics or groups. Quota sampling is often
used to ensure diversity and representation of key subgroups, but it may
introduce bias if the quotas are not accurately defined or if the selection
process is influenced by the researcher's bias.

It's important to note that non-probability sampling methods have

limitations and should be used with caution. They may introduce selection
bias and restrict the generalizability of findings. However, they can be
valuable in exploratory or qualitative research, where the focus is on in-
depth understanding, specific subgroups, or unique contexts.

8) Write about the ethical issues in Psychological research.

Ethical considerations play a crucial role in psychological research to

protect the rights, well-being, and dignity of research participants.
Researchers must adhere to ethical guidelines and principles to ensure the
ethical conduct of their studies. Here are some key ethical issues that arise
in psychological research:

1. Informed Consent: Researchers must obtain informed consent from

participants before their involvement in the study. Informed consent means
that participants have been provided with relevant information about the
study, including its purpose, procedures, potential risks, benefits, and their

14
 rights as participants. Participants should have the freedom to voluntarily
agree to participate without coercion or deception. Informed consent ensures
that participants are fully aware of the study's implications and can make
an informed decision to participate.
2. Confidentiality and Anonymity: Researchers must ensure the confidentiality
and anonymity of participants' data. Confidentiality means that the
participants' personal information and data should be kept private and not
disclosed to unauthorized individuals. Anonymity means that participants'
identities are not linked to their responses or data collected during the
study. Maintaining confidentiality and anonymity promotes trust,
encourages honest responses, and protects participants' privacy.
3. Protection from Harm: Researchers have a responsibility to minimize the
potential physical, psychological, and emotional harm to participants. They
should design their studies in a way that avoids causing undue stress,
discomfort, or harm. If there is a possibility of harm, researchers should
take appropriate measures to minimize and manage it. Participants' well-
being should always take precedence over the research objectives.
4. Deception and Debriefing: Deception should be used sparingly and only
when necessary in psychological research. If deception is employed,
researchers must provide a thorough debriefing session at the conclusion of
the study. Debriefing involves informing participants about the true nature
of the study, the reasons for the deception (if any), and addressing any
concerns or emotional reactions that participants may have. Debriefing
helps to restore trust, clarify any misconceptions, and ensure that
participants leave the study in a psychologically sound state.
5. Inclusion and Diversity: Researchers should strive to include diverse
populations and avoid any form of discrimination or bias in participant
selection and treatment. They should ensure that their research samples
represent the populations they intend to generalize the findings to.

15
 Researchers should be mindful of cultural, social, and individual differences
and ensure that their studies are sensitive to these factors.
6. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval: Before conducting any research
involving human participants, researchers must obtain approval from an
Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee. These boards or
committees review research proposals to ensure compliance with ethical
guidelines, regulations, and legal requirements. IRB approval provides an
additional layer of protection for research participants and ensures that
studies meet ethical standards.

Adhering to ethical principles in psychological research is crucial for

maintaining the integrity and trustworthiness of the field. It is the
responsibility of researchers to prioritize the well-being and rights of
participants throughout the research process and to actively address and
resolve any ethical dilemmas that may arise.

16
 SECTION B
[Marks: 5 x 6 = 30]
Instructions to the candidates:
a)Answer any five of the following questions in about 20 lines
b)Each question carries 6 marks.

9) Laboratory Vs Field Research.

In research methodology, laboratory research and field research are two
distinct approaches to conducting scientific investigations. Here's a
comparison between the two:

Laboratory Research:

1. Controlled Environment: Laboratory research is conducted in a controlled

and artificial setting, such as a laboratory or controlled experimental space.
Researchers have control over variables, conditions, and procedures,
allowing for rigorous control and manipulation of factors of interest.
2. Manipulation of Variables: In a laboratory setting, researchers can
manipulate independent variables to examine their effects on dependent
variables. This allows for a high level of control over the research conditions
and enables researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
3. Precision and Replicability: Laboratory research provides precise
measurement and control, which enhances the replicability of the study.
Researchers can replicate experiments under similar conditions, ensuring
the consistency of results and supporting the validity of findings.
4. Reduction of External Influences: Laboratory research minimizes the impact
of confounding variables and external influences that may interfere with the
research outcomes. This controlled environment helps isolate and examine
specific variables of interest.

Field Research:

17
1. Natural Environment: Field research takes place in real-world settings
outside of controlled laboratory conditions. It involves studying phenomena
as they naturally occur in their ecological context, such as observing
behaviors in natural settings, conducting surveys in community settings, or
collecting data in workplaces.
2. Ecological Validity: Field research offers a high degree of ecological validity,
as it reflects the natural behaviors, responses, and interactions of
individuals or groups in their real-life settings. This allows for a better
understanding of how variables operate in the natural world.
3. Complex and Dynamic Factors: Field research allows researchers to
investigate complex and dynamic factors that cannot be fully captured or
replicated in laboratory settings. It provides insights into the social, cultural,
and contextual influences on behavior and phenomena.
4. External Validity: Field research enhances the external validity of findings
by extending them to real-world contexts and populations beyond the
controlled laboratory setting. This enables researchers to make
generalizations and apply their findings to diverse populations and settings.

Both laboratory research and field research have their strengths and
limitations. Laboratory research provides high control and precision but
may lack ecological validity. Field research captures real-world complexity
but may have less control over variables. The choice between laboratory and
field research depends on the research question, objectives, feasibility, and
the need for control versus external validity in the study. Researchers often
use a combination of both approaches to gain a comprehensive
understanding of a phenomenon.

10) Goals of scientific research.

The goals of scientific research in research methodology can be summarized
as follows:

18
1. Description: Scientific research aims to accurately describe and document
the characteristics, behaviors, phenomena, or events under investigation.
This involves observing and measuring variables of interest, collecting data,
and systematically recording and documenting the findings. Description is
an essential initial step in research, providing a clear understanding of what
is being studied.
2. Explanation: Scientific research seeks to explain the relationships,
mechanisms, and underlying causes of the phenomena being studied. It
aims to identify patterns, associations, and causal relationships between
variables. Through systematic analysis and interpretation of data,
researchers strive to explain why certain phenomena occur, how they are
related, and what factors contribute to their occurrence.
3. Prediction: Scientific research aims to make predictions or forecasts based
on the observed patterns and relationships. By understanding the causes
and effects of variables, researchers can develop models, theories, or
frameworks that enable them to predict future outcomes or behaviors.
Prediction helps in anticipating trends, making informed decisions, and
developing interventions or strategies.
4. Control: Scientific research aspires to exert control over variables to
influence or manipulate outcomes. This involves experimental research
designs where researchers manipulate independent variables to observe
their effects on dependent variables. By controlling variables and eliminating
potential confounding factors, researchers can establish cause-and-effect
relationships and determine the impact of specific interventions or
treatments.
5. Improvement: Scientific research seeks to improve existing knowledge,
theories, practices, or interventions. It aims to contribute to the
advancement of a particular field by building upon previous research,
identifying gaps in knowledge, and proposing new ideas or solutions.

19
 Through research findings, researchers can suggest improvements,
refinements, or modifications to existing theories, methods, or practices.
6. Generalization: Scientific research aims to generalize research findings
beyond the specific study context or sample. By conducting rigorous and
representative studies, researchers can make generalizations and draw
conclusions that apply to broader populations or settings. Generalization
enhances the external validity of research findings and allows for their
application in various real-world contexts.

By pursuing these goals, scientific research contributes to the development

and expansion of knowledge, informs decision-making processes, and drives
advancements in various fields. It promotes evidence-based practices,
fosters innovation, and supports the growth of scientific disciplines.

11) Sources of a research problem.

Research problems can originate from various sources, and identifying a

suitable research problem is an essential step in the research process. Here
are some common sources of research problems:

1. Literature Review: Reviewing existing literature in a particular field or topic

can often reveal gaps, inconsistencies, or unanswered questions that
become potential research problems. The gaps may arise from conflicting
findings, contradictory theories, or areas that have received limited
attention. Researchers can identify areas where further investigation is
needed to contribute to the existing knowledge base.
2. Practical or Real-World Issues: Real-world problems, challenges, or needs
can serve as sources of research problems. These issues may arise from
industries, organizations, communities, or society at large. For example, a
company facing a specific operational challenge may require research to

20
 identify potential solutions. Identifying practical problems and addressing
them through research can have practical implications and provide
meaningful contributions.
3. Personal Curiosity or Experience: Researchers' personal interests,
experiences, or curiosity can drive the selection of research problems.
Personal observations, encounters, or gaps in knowledge that researchers
have encountered during their academic or professional journeys may
inspire research questions. Researchers may seek to explore areas that align
with their passions, expertise, or desire to make a meaningful impact.
4. Theory Development: Building or expanding upon existing theories can be a
source of research problems. Researchers may seek to refine, validate, or
challenge existing theories by conducting empirical studies. By identifying
gaps in current theoretical frameworks, researchers can formulate research
questions aimed at advancing or extending existing theories.
5. Stakeholder Input and Collaboration: Collaboration with stakeholders such
as organizations, communities, or policy-makers can generate research
problems. Engaging with stakeholders can provide insights into their
specific needs, concerns, or areas of interest. Collaborative research with
stakeholders ensures that research is relevant, applicable, and aligned with
the needs of the intended beneficiaries.
6. Funding Opportunities and Priorities: Research problems may also arise
from funding opportunities or priorities set by funding agencies,
institutions, or governments. These sources often identify specific research
areas or themes they wish to support. Researchers may align their research
questions with the funding priorities to increase their chances of securing
funding and addressing important research issues.

It is important to note that the identification of a research problem should

consider its significance, feasibility, relevance, and ethical considerations.
Researchers should critically evaluate and refine the research problem to

21
 ensure it aligns with the research objectives, resources available, and ethical
guidelines of their respective disciplines.

12) Characteristics of good hypothesis.

A good hypothesis in research should possess several key characteristics to

ensure its effectiveness and reliability. Here are some important
characteristics of a good hypothesis:

1. Testability: A good hypothesis should be testable, meaning it can be

empirically examined and evaluated through research methods and data
collection. It should be possible to design experiments or gather evidence
that either supports or refutes the hypothesis.
2. Falsifiability: A good hypothesis should be falsifiable, which means that it is
capable of being proven false. It should allow for the possibility of generating
evidence that contradicts or rejects the hypothesis. Falsifiability is important
because it helps to differentiate scientific hypotheses from unfalsifiable
claims.
3. Clear and Specific: A good hypothesis should be clear, concise, and specific
in its formulation. It should clearly state the relationship or expected
outcome being investigated and define the variables involved. The
hypothesis should be written in a way that leaves no ambiguity or room for
misinterpretation.
4. Grounded in Theory and Previous Research: A good hypothesis should be
based on a solid theoretical foundation and relevant previous research. It
should be informed by existing knowledge, literature, and empirical
evidence. The hypothesis should build upon existing theories or concepts
and contribute to the body of knowledge in the field.
5. Testable with Available Resources: A good hypothesis should be feasible to
test with the available resources, including time, funding, and access to

22
 participants or data. It should consider the practical constraints and
limitations of the research study and ensure that the necessary resources
are available to test the hypothesis effectively.
6. Coherence with Research Objectives: A good hypothesis should align with
the overall research objectives and research question of the study. It should
address a specific aspect or relationship of interest within the broader
research context. The hypothesis should contribute to answering the
research question and provide meaningful insights into the research
problem.
7. Logical and Reasonable: A good hypothesis should be logical and reasonable
based on the available evidence and logical inference. It should be supported
by a rationale and logical reasoning, drawing from existing knowledge and
observations. The hypothesis should not be based on personal beliefs,
biases, or unfounded assumptions.

By adhering to these characteristics, researchers can formulate hypotheses

that are well-designed, testable, and contribute to the scientific process. A
good hypothesis guides the research process, provides a framework for data
collection and analysis, and ultimately helps researchers draw meaningful
conclusions from their research findings.

13) Basic principles of experimental designs.

Experimental designs are structured plans that researchers use to control
and manipulate variables in order to investigate cause-and-effect
relationships. The following are some basic principles of experimental
designs:

1. Randomization: Randomization is the process of assigning participants to

different experimental conditions or groups randomly. It helps minimize bias
and ensure that each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to

23
 any group. Random assignment helps in creating equivalent groups,
reducing the influence of confounding variables, and increasing the internal
validity of the study.
2. Control Group: A control group is a group that does not receive the
experimental treatment or intervention. It serves as a baseline for
comparison with the experimental group(s) that receive the treatment. The
control group allows researchers to assess the effect of the treatment by
comparing the outcomes between the control and experimental groups.
3. Manipulation of Independent Variables: Independent variables are the
variables that researchers manipulate or control to examine their effect on
the dependent variable. Experimental designs involve deliberately
manipulating independent variables to observe the resulting changes in the
dependent variable. The manipulation helps establish a cause-and-effect
relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
4. Randomized Controlled Trials: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a
common type of experimental design used in research. RCTs involve
randomly assigning participants to different groups, including experimental
and control groups, and then comparing their outcomes. RCTs are
considered the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions
or treatments.
5. Replication: Replication refers to the repetition of an experiment or study
with different samples or in different settings. Replication helps establish
the reliability and generalizability of research findings. Replication allows for
the assessment of the consistency and robustness of the observed effects
across multiple instances, strengthening the validity of the results.
6. Counterbalancing: Counterbalancing is a technique used in experimental
designs to control for order effects, such as practice effects or fatigue effects.
It involves systematically varying the order in which different conditions or

24
 treatments are presented to participants. Counterbalancing ensures that the
order of presentation does not systematically bias the results.
7. Internal Validity and External Validity: Internal validity refers to the extent
to which a study accurately measures the cause-and-effect relationship
between variables. Experimental designs aim to maximize internal validity
by controlling for confounding variables and establishing a clear causal link.
External validity refers to the generalizability of research findings to real-
world settings and populations.

These principles guide researchers in designing experiments that allow for

valid and reliable conclusions. By implementing these principles,
researchers can minimize biases, control for extraneous factors, and
establish strong evidence for causal relationships between variables.

14) Advantages & disadvantages of between-groups designs.

Between-groups designs, also known as between-subjects designs, are
experimental designs in which different groups of participants are assigned
to different conditions or treatments. Here are the advantages and
disadvantages of between-groups designs:

Advantages:

1. Reduced Order Effects: Between-groups designs minimize order effects such

as practice effects or fatigue effects that can occur in within-groups designs.
Each participant is exposed to only one condition, reducing the likelihood of
carryover effects from one condition to another.
2. Elimination of Confounding Variables: By assigning participants to different
groups, between-groups designs help control for potential confounding
variables that may influence the outcomes. Participants in different groups

25
 experience only one level of the independent variable, reducing the potential
influence of extraneous factors.
3. Enhanced Internal Validity: Between-groups designs can enhance internal
validity by reducing the potential for demand characteristics or participant
biases. Participants are less likely to detect the true purpose of the study or
adjust their behavior based on their exposure to multiple conditions.
4. Simplicity in Data Analysis: Data analysis in between-groups designs is
often straightforward. Group means can be directly compared using
statistical tests, making it easier to assess the differences between
conditions.

Disadvantages:

1. Increased Participant Variability: Between-groups designs require separate

groups of participants for each condition, resulting in increased participant
variability. Individual differences between participants can introduce noise
and reduce the sensitivity of detecting treatment effects.
2. Larger Sample Sizes Required: Due to the increased variability and the need
for separate groups, between-groups designs typically require larger sample
sizes compared to within-groups designs. This can result in increased
recruitment efforts, time, and cost.
3. Potential for Selection Bias: Random assignment to groups helps mitigate
selection bias, but it is not always possible or practical to achieve complete
randomization. If participants self-select into conditions or if assignment is
not truly random, there is a risk of selection bias, which may compromise
the internal validity of the study.
4. Limited Ability to Assess Individual Change: Between-groups designs do not
allow for the examination of individual changes over time since each
participant is assigned to only one condition. Longitudinal or within-subject
changes cannot be directly observed or analyzed.

26
5. Limited Generalizability: Results from between-groups designs may have
limited generalizability to real-world contexts where individuals are exposed
to multiple conditions or treatments simultaneously. The controlled nature
of the design may not fully capture the complexity and interaction of
variables in natural settings.

It is important to consider these advantages and disadvantages when

selecting a research design. Researchers should carefully weigh the trade-
offs and choose the design that best suits their research question,
resources, and constraints.

15) Systematic sampling technique.

Systematic sampling is a probability sampling technique used in research to
select a sample from a larger population. In systematic sampling, the
researcher selects every nth element from the population to form the
sample. Here's how systematic sampling works:

1. Define the Population: First, the researcher defines the population of

interest. The population could be any group of individuals, objects, or events
that share certain characteristics and are the focus of the research.
2. Determine Sample Size: Next, the researcher determines the desired sample
size, which is the number of elements to be included in the sample. The
sample size should be representative of the population and provide sufficient
statistical power to draw valid conclusions.
3. Calculate Sampling Interval: The sampling interval is calculated by dividing
the population size by the desired sample size. For example, if the
population size is 1,000 and the desired sample size is 100, the sampling
interval would be 1,000/100 = 10.

27
4. Random Starting Point: To introduce randomness into the systematic
sampling process, a random starting point is selected. This can be done by
randomly choosing a number between 1 and the sampling interval.
5. Select Sample Elements: Starting from the random starting point, every nth
element is selected as part of the sample. For example, if the sampling
interval is 10, the researcher would select the first element, and then every
10th element thereafter until the desired sample size is reached.

Advantages of Systematic Sampling:

1. Simplicity: Systematic sampling is relatively easy to implement and requires

less time and effort compared to other probability sampling techniques.
2. Representativeness: If the population has a random or unknown ordering,
systematic sampling can provide a representative sample. It ensures that all
elements in the population have an equal chance of being included in the
sample.
3. Efficiency: Systematic sampling can be more efficient than simple random
sampling when the population is large and spread out. It allows researchers
to cover a larger portion of the population with fewer resources.

Disadvantages of Systematic Sampling:

1. Sampling Bias: If there is a pattern or regularity in the ordering of elements

in the population, systematic sampling can introduce sampling bias. It may
exclude certain elements or oversample others, leading to a non-
representative sample.
2. Potential Periodicity: Systematic sampling can introduce periodicity if the
pattern of the population matches the sampling interval. This can result in
missing certain characteristics or introducing unintended patterns in the
sample.

28
3. Sensitivity to Starting Point: The random selection of the starting point is
crucial in systematic sampling. If the starting point is not truly random or if
it is biased in any way, it can affect the representativeness of the sample.

It is important to note that systematic sampling assumes a random ordering

of the population. If there is a systematic pattern in the population that is
relevant to the research question, alternative sampling techniques should be
considered to ensure a more representative sample.

16) Population variability & sampling error.

Population variability and sampling error are important concepts in the field
of statistics and sampling. They are related to the accuracy and
representativeness of a sample in relation to the population it is drawn from.

Population Variability: Population variability refers to the degree of variation

or diversity among individuals or elements within a population. It measures
the spread or dispersion of values within the entire population. A population
with high variability means that there is a wide range of values or
characteristics present, while a population with low variability indicates a
more homogeneous or similar set of values.

Sampling Error: Sampling error, also known as estimation error, is the

difference between a sample statistic and the true population parameter it
represents. It arises due to the fact that we are working with a sample rather
than the entire population. Sampling error is the result of random variation
and uncertainty in the sampling process.

Sampling error is an unavoidable aspect of sampling, and it affects the

accuracy and precision of statistical estimates. The larger the sampling
error, the less representative the sample is likely to be of the population.
However, by using appropriate sampling techniques and larger sample sizes,

29
researchers can minimize sampling error and increase the reliability of their
estimates.

Relationship between Population Variability and Sampling Error: The

relationship between population variability and sampling error is inversely
related. When the population variability is high, the potential for sampling
error also increases. This is because a high degree of variability makes it
more difficult to capture the full range of characteristics within the
population through a sample. As a result, the sample may not accurately
represent the population, leading to larger sampling errors.

On the other hand, when the population variability is low, sampling error
tends to be smaller. In a population with low variability, the sample is more
likely to capture the true population characteristics accurately, resulting in
smaller differences between the sample and population estimates.

To minimize sampling error and improve the representativeness of a sample,

researchers should use appropriate sampling techniques, such as random
sampling, stratified sampling, or cluster sampling. Additionally, increasing
the sample size can help reduce sampling error by providing more reliable
estimates of population parameters.

It is important for researchers to understand and consider population

variability and sampling error when interpreting research findings and
generalizing results to the larger population.

17) Different methods in Research Methodology. Explain about

Observation Method.
In research methodology, there are various types of methods that
researchers employ to collect and analyze data. These methods can be

30
 broadly categorized into qualitative methods, quantitative methods, and
mixed methods. Here is an overview of these different types of methods:

1. Qualitative Methods: Qualitative research methods focus on exploring and

understanding subjective experiences, meanings, and social phenomena.
These methods involve collecting rich, descriptive data through methods
such as interviews, observations, and analysis of textual or visual materials.
Some commonly used qualitative methods include:
 Interviews: Conducting individual or group interviews to gather in-depth
insights, perspectives, and narratives from participants.
 Observations: Systematically observing and recording behaviors,
interactions, and phenomena in natural or controlled settings.
 Focus Groups: Facilitating group discussions among participants to explore
shared experiences, opinions, and attitudes.
 Content Analysis: Analyzing and interpreting textual or visual data, such as
documents, interviews, or media content, to identify patterns and themes.
 Ethnography: Immersing in a social group or community to understand
their culture, practices, and social dynamics through participant
observation and interviews.
2. Quantitative Methods: Quantitative research methods involve the collection
and analysis of numerical data to uncover patterns, relationships, and
statistical associations. These methods rely on structured data collection
tools and statistical analysis techniques. Some commonly used quantitative
methods include:
 Surveys: Administering questionnaires or structured surveys to collect data
from a large number of participants.
 Experiments: Manipulating variables in a controlled environment to examine
cause-and-effect relationships.

31
 Statistical Analysis: Applying statistical techniques to analyze numerical
data, such as regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and inferential
statistics.
 Quasi-experiments: Conducting research in natural settings where the
researcher has partial control over variables.
 Longitudinal Studies: Collecting data from the same individuals or groups
over an extended period to study changes and trends.
3. Mixed Methods: Mixed methods research combines elements of both
qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a comprehensive
understanding of a research topic. Researchers integrate data collection and
analysis techniques from both approaches to gain deeper insights. This
allows for a more holistic understanding of complex research questions.
Mixed methods can involve sequential designs (qualitative followed by
quantitative or vice versa) or concurrent designs (simultaneous collection
and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data).

Researchers choose the appropriate research methods based on the

research question, objectives, nature of the phenomenon under study,
available resources, and the desired depth of understanding. The selection
of methods should align with the research design and aim to enhance the
validity, reliability, and credibility of the findings.

The observation method is a research technique that involves systematically

watching and recording behaviors, events, or phenomena in their natural
settings. It is a valuable research tool used across various disciplines,
including psychology, sociology, anthropology, and education. The
observation method provides researchers with firsthand, objective data by
directly observing and documenting the behaviors and interactions of
individuals or groups. Here are some key points about the observation
method:

32
1. Types of Observation:
 Naturalistic Observation: In naturalistic observation, researchers
observe and record behaviors in natural settings without intervening
or manipulating the environment. The aim is to capture authentic
behaviors as they naturally occur.
 Participant Observation: In participant observation, the researcher
actively participates in the observed group or setting while also
observing and recording behaviors. This method allows for a deeper
understanding of social interactions and the subjective experiences of
the participants.
 Structured Observation: In structured observation, the researcher
defines specific behaviors or events of interest and systematically
records their occurrence. The observation is typically guided by a pre-
determined coding scheme or checklist.
 Unstructured Observation: Unstructured observation involves
observing and recording behaviors in an open-ended manner without
specific pre-defined categories or criteria. It allows for flexibility and
the discovery of unexpected patterns or behaviors.
2. Advantages of the Observation Method:
 High Validity: Observation provides firsthand, real-time data that can
accurately capture behaviors and interactions in their natural context.
 Ecological Validity: By studying individuals or groups in their natural
settings, the observation method enhances ecological validity,
ensuring that the findings are applicable to real-life situations.
 Nonverbal Behavior: Observations are particularly useful for capturing
nonverbal behaviors, which may convey important information that is
not easily captured through other research methods.

33
  Objective Data: Observations aim to be objective and unbiased, as
they involve direct observations of behaviors rather than relying on
self-reports or interpretations.
3. Limitations of the Observation Method:
 Observer Bias: The presence of the observer may influence the
behaviors of the individuals being observed, leading to observer bias.
Researchers must be aware of their own biases and strive to minimize
their impact on the observations.
 Limited Generalizability: The observations are context-specific,
limiting the generalizability of the findings to other settings or
populations.
 Time and Resource Intensive: Observational studies can be time-
consuming and require significant resources, especially if conducted
over an extended period or in multiple locations.
 Ethical Considerations: In certain situations, observation may raise
ethical concerns, such as invading privacy or observing sensitive or
confidential behaviors.

The observation method offers valuable insights into human behavior and
social interactions. It allows researchers to collect objective data in natural
settings, providing a foundation for further analysis and understanding.
When used appropriately and combined with other research methods, the
observation method can contribute to a comprehensive understanding of
various phenomena.

18) Sources of information while conducting research.

When conducting research, there are several sources of information that
researchers can utilize to gather relevant data and insights. These sources
can vary depending on the nature of the research topic and the specific

34
 research methodology employed. Here are some common sources of
information in research:

1. Primary Sources: Primary sources are firsthand accounts or original data

collected specifically for the research project. These sources provide the
most direct and original information. Examples of primary sources include
surveys, interviews, experiments, observations, and fieldwork.
2. Secondary Sources: Secondary sources are existing sources of information
that were created by others for purposes other than the current research
project. These sources provide interpretations, analyses, or summaries of
primary sources. Examples of secondary sources include books, scholarly
articles, research reports, government publications, and academic
databases.
3. Published Literature: Published literature encompasses scholarly journals,
academic books, conference proceedings, and dissertations. Researchers can
access a wide range of published literature relevant to their research topic
through libraries, online databases, and academic repositories. Published
literature provides comprehensive and peer-reviewed information that can
support and contextualize the research.
4. Online Sources: The internet offers a vast array of information sources that
researchers can access. This includes websites, online articles, blogs,
forums, and social media platforms. While online sources can be valuable
for gathering insights and current information, researchers need to critically
evaluate the credibility, validity, and reliability of the sources.
5. Government and Institutional Sources: Government agencies, research
institutions, and organizations often publish reports, statistics, policy
documents, and white papers that can be valuable sources of information
for research. These sources provide official data, expert opinions, and
insights into various fields and industries.

35
6. Personal Communications: Researchers may gather information through
personal communications, such as interviews, surveys, or discussions with
experts, professionals, or individuals with specialized knowledge in the
research area. Personal communications can provide unique insights,
firsthand experiences, and perspectives that may not be readily available
through other sources.
7. Archives and Records: Archives, historical documents, and records can be
valuable sources for historical and qualitative research. These sources
provide primary and secondary materials that offer historical context,
narratives, and in-depth understanding of specific events, individuals, or
phenomena.

It is important for researchers to critically evaluate and cite their sources to

ensure transparency, accuracy, and credibility in their research.
Additionally, researchers should adhere to ethical guidelines and copyright
regulations when accessing and using information from various sources.

36
 FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

M.Sc.II Year Second Spell Examination, July - 2022

Subject – 35: PSYCHOLOGY
Course – 09 : Research Methodology

Time : 3 Hours] [Max.Marks : 70

[Min.Marks : 28
SECTION – A

[Marks : 4 x 10 =40]
Instructions to the candidates:

a) Answer any four of the following questions in about 40 lines each.

b) Each question carries 10 marks.

1) Explain the advantages and disadvantages of laboratory and field

research
Laboratory research and field research are two primary approaches in
conducting scientific investigations. Each approach has its advantages and
disadvantages, and the choice between them depends on the research
question, feasibility, and desired outcomes. Here are the advantages and
disadvantages of laboratory research and field research:

Laboratory Research:

Advantages:

1. Control: Laboratory research allows for a high level of control over

experimental conditions. Researchers can manipulate variables, control
extraneous factors, and create standardized environments, which increases
internal validity.

37
2. Replication: Laboratory experiments are easier to replicate due to the
controlled conditions, which enhances the reliability and generalizability of
findings.
3. Precision: Laboratory research often involves precise measurement
instruments and techniques, allowing for accurate data collection and
analysis.
4. Ethical Considerations: In certain cases, laboratory research provides an
ethical advantage by allowing researchers to study sensitive or potentially
harmful variables without directly involving human or natural subjects.

Disadvantages:

1. Artificiality: Laboratory settings may lack ecological validity, meaning the

findings may not fully reflect real-world situations and behaviors.
2. Demand Characteristics: Participants in a laboratory setting may alter their
behavior due to the awareness of being observed or the desire to comply
with perceived expectations, leading to demand characteristics and potential
bias.
3. Generalizability: The controlled conditions of laboratory research may limit
the generalizability of findings to real-world contexts or diverse populations.
4. Resource Intensive: Conducting laboratory research can be costly and time-
consuming, requiring specialized equipment, facilities, and personnel.

Field Research:

Advantages:

1. Ecological Validity: Field research takes place in natural settings, providing

a higher degree of ecological validity and the opportunity to study real-world
behaviors and phenomena.

38
2. Diversity and Representativeness: Field research often involves diverse
participants or contexts, enhancing the external validity and generalizability
of findings to real-world populations.
3. Depth of Understanding: Field research allows for in-depth exploration and
understanding of complex phenomena within their natural context,
capturing nuances and contextual factors.
4. Flexibility: Field research offers flexibility in data collection methods,
including interviews, observations, and surveys, allowing researchers to
adapt to the specific research context.

Disadvantages:

1. Lack of Control: Field research involves less control over variables and
conditions compared to laboratory research, making it challenging to
establish causal relationships.
2. Confounding Factors: The presence of confounding factors and uncontrolled
variables in field research may introduce bias and make it difficult to isolate
specific effects.
3. Practical Constraints: Conducting field research can be logistically
challenging, requiring access to specific locations, coordination with
participants, and potential difficulties in data collection.
4. Time and Cost: Field research may require significant time and resources for
data collection, travel, and logistical arrangements.

Researchers should carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of

laboratory research and field research in relation to their research objectives
and constraints. In some cases, a combination of both approaches (mixed
methods) can be employed to benefit from the strengths of each approach
and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research question.

39
 2) Write about survey research.

Survey research is a widely used method in social science research that

involves collecting data from a sample of individuals or groups using
structured questionnaires or interviews. Surveys aim to gather information
on attitudes, beliefs, opinions, behaviors, and characteristics of a target
population. This method allows researchers to collect data efficiently,
analyze trends, and make generalizations about the larger population. Here
are some key aspects of survey research:

1. Survey Design: The design of a survey involves several crucial

considerations, including the selection of appropriate survey questions,
response formats (e.g., multiple-choice, Likert scale, open-ended), and
overall structure. Careful attention should be given to the wording of
questions, ensuring they are clear, unbiased, and suitable for the target
audience.
2. Sampling: Survey research often involves selecting a representative sample
from the target population to ensure the findings can be generalized.
Sampling techniques include random sampling, stratified sampling, cluster
sampling, or convenience sampling, depending on the research objectives
and available resources.
3. Data Collection: Surveys can be conducted through various methods,
including face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, online surveys, or
paper-based questionnaires. The choice of data collection method depends
on factors such as the nature of the research, accessibility of the population,
and resources available.
4. Data Analysis: Once the survey data is collected, it needs to be analyzed to
draw meaningful conclusions. Data analysis techniques may involve
quantitative analysis, such as statistical tests, correlation analysis, or

40
 descriptive statistics. Qualitative analysis techniques, such as thematic
coding or content analysis, can also be employed to analyze open-ended
responses.

Advantages of Survey Research:

 Efficient Data Collection: Surveys allow for the collection of data from a large
number of respondents in a relatively short period, making it an efficient
method for gathering information.
 Generalizability: By using appropriate sampling techniques, survey research
enables researchers to make inferences and generalize the findings to the
larger population.
 Standardization: Surveys provide a standardized approach to data
collection, ensuring consistency in questionnaires and response formats,
which enhances comparability across respondents.
 Flexibility: Surveys can be tailored to address various research questions
and can be conducted using different methods, including online surveys,
face-to-face interviews, or telephone interviews.

Disadvantages of Survey Research:

 Response Bias: Respondents may provide socially desirable responses or

may not accurately recall or report their attitudes or behaviors, leading to
response bias.
 Limited Depth: Surveys are typically focused on obtaining specific
information and may not capture the depth of understanding or context that
other qualitative methods may provide.
 Sampling Limitations: The representativeness of the sample depends on the
chosen sampling method, and there may be challenges in reaching certain
populations, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings.

41
 Questionnaire Design Challenges: Crafting effective survey questions and
response formats that capture the desired information without bias or
ambiguity can be challenging.

Overall, survey research is a valuable method for collecting data in a

structured and systematic manner. It allows researchers to gather
information from a large sample, analyze trends, and make generalizations
about the target population. By carefully designing the survey, addressing
potential biases, and using appropriate sampling techniques, survey
research can provide valuable insights into various social, psychological,
and behavioral phenomena.

3) How do you formulate a research problem? Explain.

Formulating a research problem is a crucial step in the research process as

it defines the focus and direction of the study. Here are the steps involved in
formulating a research problem:

1. Identify the Research Area: Start by identifying the general area of interest
or the field in which you want to conduct your research. This could be a
broad topic, such as psychology, marketing, education, or healthcare.
2. Review Existing Literature: Conduct a thorough review of the existing
literature related to your research area. This helps you understand the
current knowledge, identify gaps or unresolved issues, and determine what
research questions have already been addressed.
3. Identify a Specific Research Gap: Based on the literature review, identify a
specific gap or problem that has not been adequately addressed or remains
unanswered. This gap could be a contradiction in findings, a limitation in
previous studies, an emerging issue, or a practical problem in the field.

42
4. Formulate Research Questions: Once the research gap is identified,
formulate specific research questions that address the gap. Research
questions should be clear, focused, and capable of being answered through
empirical investigation. They should be specific enough to guide your
research but broad enough to allow for exploration and analysis.
5. Define Objectives and Scope: Determine the objectives of your research,
which are the specific goals you aim to achieve through your study. Clearly
define the scope of your research by specifying the boundaries and
limitations of your investigation. This helps to narrow down the focus and
ensure a manageable and realistic research project.
6. Consider Feasibility: Assess the feasibility of your research problem.
Consider factors such as available resources (time, funding, access to
participants), ethical considerations, and the practicality of conducting the
research within the given constraints.
7. Refine and Finalize: Continuously refine and clarify your research problem,
research questions, objectives, and scope based on feedback from mentors,
peers, or experts in the field. Ensure that they are aligned with your
research interests, feasible to investigate, and contribute to the existing
knowledge in a meaningful way.

By following these steps, you can formulate a well-defined research problem

that is relevant, significant, and feasible to investigate. A clear research
problem guides the entire research process, from designing the study to
collecting and analyzing data, ultimately leading to meaningful findings and
contributing to the existing body of knowledge in your chosen field.

4) Write about Quasi-experimental designs.

Quasi-experimental designs are research designs that share some
similarities with experimental designs but lack full control over the
assignment of participants to groups. In quasi-experimental designs,

43
 researchers cannot randomly assign participants to different groups due to
ethical, practical, or logistical constraints. As a result, quasi-experimental
designs are often used in situations where true experimental designs are not
feasible or ethical. Here are some key characteristics and examples of quasi-
experimental designs:

1. Non-Randomized Group Designs: Quasi-experimental designs often involve

the comparison of pre-existing groups that naturally differ in certain
characteristics. The groups may be formed based on pre-existing conditions,
such as different schools, communities, or organizational units. For
example, a researcher comparing the academic performance of students
from different schools without randomly assigning them to the schools
would use a non-randomized group design.
2. Pre-Post Designs: Quasi-experimental designs can also involve measuring
the same group of participants before and after a treatment or intervention.
The changes in the measured variables are then examined to assess the
impact of the treatment. For instance, a study evaluating the effectiveness of
an educational program by comparing students' academic performance
before and after the program would use a pre-post design.
3. Time Series Designs: In time series designs, researchers collect multiple
measurements of the same group or population over time. This allows for
the examination of trends and changes in the measured variables before and
after an intervention or event. For example, a study examining the impact of
a policy change on crime rates by collecting crime data over several years
would use a time series design.
4. Nonequivalent Control Group Designs: Quasi-experimental designs can
involve the use of control groups that are similar to the treatment group but
not formed through random assignment. Researchers aim to select control
groups that are as comparable as possible to the treatment group to
minimize confounding variables. For instance, a study comparing the

44
 effectiveness of two teaching methods by assigning one method to a specific
school and another method to a similar school would use a nonequivalent
control group design.

Advantages of Quasi-Experimental Designs:

 Feasibility: Quasi-experimental designs are often more practical and feasible

in real-world settings where random assignment is not possible or ethical.
 Ecological Validity: These designs can provide insights into how
interventions or events naturally occur in real-world contexts, increasing the
ecological validity of the findings.
 Longitudinal Perspective: Quasi-experimental designs allow for the
examination of changes and trends over time, providing a longitudinal
perspective that can capture the dynamic nature of certain phenomena.

Disadvantages of Quasi-Experimental Designs:

 Selection Bias: Since participants are not randomly assigned, there is a risk
of selection bias, where the groups being compared may differ in important
ways that could affect the outcomes.
 Confounding Variables: Quasi-experimental designs are more susceptible to
confounding variables that may influence the relationship between the
treatment or intervention and the outcomes.
 Internal Validity: The lack of random assignment in quasi-experimental
designs makes it challenging to establish causal relationships between the
treatment or intervention and the outcomes with the same level of certainty
as in true experimental designs.

Quasi-experimental designs offer a valuable alternative when true

experimental designs are not feasible or ethical. Despite their limitations,
these designs provide valuable insights into causal relationships and real-

45
 world applications, allowing researchers to make informed decisions and
recommendations based on the available evidence

5) What are the probability sampling techniques? Explain any one

detail.
Probability sampling techniques are methods used to select a sample from a
larger population in a way that ensures each element in the population has
a known and equal chance of being included in the sample. These
techniques allow researchers to make statistical inferences about the
population based on the characteristics observed in the sample. Here are
some commonly used probability sampling techniques:

1. Simple Random Sampling: Simple random sampling involves randomly

selecting individuals from the population, where each member has an equal
chance of being included in the sample. This can be done using techniques
such as random number tables, random number generators, or lottery
methods. Simple random sampling ensures that each element in the
population has an equal probability of selection, reducing the potential for
bias.

Let's take an example to illustrate simple random sampling. Suppose you

want to study the job satisfaction of employees in a large organization. The
population consists of all employees in the organization. To select a simple
random sample, you can assign a unique number to each employee and use
a random number generator to randomly select a specified number of
employees. The selected employees will represent the sample for your study.

Advantages of Simple Random Sampling:

 Eliminates bias: Simple random sampling ensures that each element in the
population has an equal chance of being selected, reducing selection bias.

46
 Statistical generalizability: The sample obtained through simple random
sampling allows for statistical generalization to the population, assuming
the sample is representative.

Limitations of Simple Random Sampling:

 Time and cost: Simple random sampling may be time-consuming and costly,
especially when the population size is large.
 Inefficiency: In some cases, simple random sampling may not be the most
efficient method, as it does not take into account any stratification or
clustering within the population.

It's important to note that there are other probability sampling techniques,
such as stratified sampling, cluster sampling, and systematic sampling.
Each technique has its own advantages and is suitable for different research
contexts. Researchers should carefully consider the characteristics of the
population and the specific research objectives when selecting the most
appropriate probability sampling technique.

6) What are the methods of data collection? Explain any one

method

There are several methods of data collection used in research, depending on

the nature of the study, research questions, and available resources. Some
common methods of data collection include surveys, interviews,
observations, experiments, and document analysis. Let's focus on the survey
method as an example:

Survey Method:

47
 The survey method involves collecting data from a sample of individuals or
groups through the use of structured questionnaires or surveys. Surveys
can be administered in various formats, including paper-based
questionnaires, online surveys, telephone interviews, or face-to-face
interviews. Here is an overview of the survey method:

1. Designing the Survey: The first step is to design the survey instrument,
which includes selecting appropriate questions and response options. The
questions should be clear, concise, and relevant to the research objectives.
Researchers may use different types of questions, such as multiple-choice,
Likert scale, or open-ended questions, depending on the information they
want to collect.
2. Sampling: Researchers need to determine the target population and select a
representative sample from that population. The sampling method can be
probability-based (such as simple random sampling or stratified sampling)
or non-probability-based (such as convenience sampling or purposive
sampling). The sample size should be determined based on statistical
considerations to ensure the results are reliable and generalizable.
3. Data Collection: Once the survey instrument is prepared and the sample is
selected, data collection can begin. Surveys can be administered through
various means, such as mail, online platforms, telephone calls, or face-to-
face interviews. Researchers need to ensure that participants understand
the instructions and provide accurate and honest responses. It's important
to maintain confidentiality and anonymity if necessary to encourage
participants to respond truthfully.
4. Data Analysis: After data collection, the responses need to be coded and
entered into a database or statistical software for analysis. Depending on the
research questions, different statistical techniques can be applied to analyze
the data, such as descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, or regression

48
 analysis. The results are then interpreted and used to answer the research
questions or test hypotheses.

Advantages of the Survey Method:

 Efficient: Surveys allow researchers to collect data from a large number of

participants quickly and efficiently.
 Standardization: Surveys provide standardized questions and response
options, ensuring consistency in data collection and facilitating comparisons
across participants or groups.
 Versatility: Surveys can be adapted to various research contexts and topics,
making them suitable for a wide range of studies.

Limitations of the Survey Method:

 Self-report bias: Surveys rely on participants' self-reports, which may be

influenced by response biases, social desirability bias, or inaccurate recall.
 Limited depth: Surveys may provide limited insight into complex
phenomena, as they often collect data through fixed response options and
may not capture the richness of qualitative data.
 Non-response bias: If a subset of participants chooses not to respond to the
survey, there is a risk of non-response bias, which can affect the
representativeness of the findings.

Overall, the survey method is a widely used and valuable approach for
collecting data in research. It allows researchers to gather information from
a large sample of participants and obtain quantitative data that can be
analyzed using statistical methods. However, researchers should carefully
consider the strengths and limitations of the survey method in relation to
their research goals and design.

49
 7) Write about convenience sampling and Quota sampling.
Convenience Sampling:

Convenience sampling is a non-probability sampling technique in which

participants are selected based on their accessibility and availability. In
convenience sampling, the researcher chooses individuals or groups who are
readily accessible and convenient to include in the study. This method is
often used when it is challenging or impractical to obtain a representative
sample from the target population. Here are some key features of
convenience sampling:

Procedure: Convenience sampling involves selecting participants who are

conveniently available to the researcher. For example, the researcher may
choose individuals who are present in a specific location (e.g., a university
campus) or use personal contacts to recruit participants. Convenience
sampling does not involve random selection or a systematic process for
participant selection.

Advantages:

1. Easy and time-efficient: Convenience sampling is a convenient and quick

method of data collection, as it involves selecting participants who are
readily accessible.
2. Cost-effective: This sampling method can be cost-effective as it requires
minimal resources and effort compared to other sampling techniques.
3. Useful for exploratory research: Convenience sampling is often used in
exploratory studies or preliminary investigations to gain initial insights and
generate hypotheses for further research.

Disadvantages:

50
1. Limited generalizability: Since convenience samples are not representative of
the entire population, the findings from convenience sampling cannot be
generalized to the broader population with certainty.
2. Biased sample: Convenience sampling can introduce bias into the study, as
individuals who are more accessible or willing to participate may have
different characteristics or perspectives compared to the larger population.
This can affect the external validity of the findings.
3. Lack of diversity: Convenience sampling may result in a sample that lacks
diversity and may not adequately represent the heterogeneity of the
population of interest.

Quota Sampling:

Quota sampling is a non-probability sampling technique that involves

dividing the target population into subgroups or strata and establishing
quotas for each subgroup. Quota sampling aims to ensure that the sample
reflects the characteristics of the population in terms of key variables, such
as age, gender, ethnicity, or occupation. Here are some key features of quota
sampling:

Procedure: In quota sampling, the researcher identifies relevant

characteristics or variables of interest and sets quotas for each subgroup
based on the desired proportions in the sample. The researcher then selects
participants who meet the quotas within each subgroup until the desired
sample size is reached. Quota sampling does not involve random selection or
equal probability of selection for each individual.

Advantages:

1. Enhanced representation: Quota sampling allows researchers to ensure that

the sample includes individuals from different subgroups or strata in

51
 proportions that match the population characteristics. This increases the
representativeness of the sample.
2. Simplicity and cost-effectiveness: Quota sampling is relatively simpler and
less costly compared to probability sampling techniques, as it does not
require random selection or complex sampling procedures.
3. Flexibility: Quota sampling provides flexibility in participant selection, as
long as the quotas for each subgroup are met. This can be useful when
specific subgroups need to be adequately represented in the sample.

Disadvantages:

1. Potential bias: Quota sampling can still introduce bias if the researcher's
judgment in selecting participants within each quota leads to non-random
selection. This can affect the external validity and generalizability of the
findings.
2. Subjectivity: The selection of participants within each quota is subjective
and based on the researcher's judgment, which may introduce personal
biases.
3. Time-consuming: Quota sampling may require more time compared to
convenience sampling, as the researcher needs to ensure that the quotas for
each subgroup are adequately fulfilled.

In summary, convenience sampling and quota sampling are non-probability

sampling techniques used when probability sampling is impractical or not
feasible. While convenience sampling relies on the accessibility and
availability of participants, quota sampling aims to ensure that the sample
reflects the characteristics of the above two samplings.

52
 8) Describe ethics in psychological research.
Ethics in psychological research refers to the principles and guidelines that
govern the conduct of research involving human participants. These ethical
considerations ensure the protection of participants' rights, well-being, and
dignity, as well as the integrity and credibility of the research process.
Ethical guidelines provide a framework for researchers to follow, addressing
various aspects of research design, participant recruitment, informed
consent, data collection, confidentiality, and publication.

Some key ethical considerations in psychological research include:

1. Informed Consent: Researchers must obtain voluntary and informed consent

from participants before their involvement in the study. Participants should
be provided with clear information about the purpose of the study,
procedures, potential risks or benefits, and their right to withdraw without
consequences.
2. Confidentiality and Anonymity: Researchers should ensure the privacy and
confidentiality of participants' personal information. Data collected should
be stored securely, and participants' identities should be protected. If
anonymity is guaranteed, participants cannot be identified from the data.
3. Protection from Harm: Researchers have a responsibility to prevent physical,
psychological, or emotional harm to participants. Any potential risks
associated with the study should be identified and minimized. Participants
should not be subjected to unnecessary stress, discomfort, or invasive
procedures.
4. Deception and Debriefing: If deception is necessary in the research,
researchers must provide a debriefing session at the end of the study.
Participants should be informed of the true purpose of the study, any
deception used, and the reasons behind it. Debriefing provides an

53
 opportunity for participants to ask questions, address any concerns, and
ensure they leave the study without any negative effects.
5. Balance of Benefits and Risks: Researchers must carefully consider the
potential benefits of the study for advancing knowledge or improving societal
well-being against any potential risks to participants. The benefits should
outweigh the risks and justify the participation of individuals.
6. Research with Vulnerable Populations: Special care must be taken when
conducting research involving vulnerable populations, such as children,
individuals with cognitive impairments, prisoners, or individuals with
diminished autonomy. Additional safeguards should be implemented to
protect their rights and well-being.
7. Conflict of Interest: Researchers should disclose any potential conflicts of
interest that may compromise the integrity of the research or the welfare of
participants. This includes financial, professional, or personal relationships
that may influence the research process or outcomes.
8. Research Integrity and Reporting: Researchers are expected to conduct their
research with honesty, transparency, and integrity. They should accurately
report their methods, findings, and interpretations, avoiding selective
reporting or fabrication of data.
9. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval: Researchers are often required to
obtain approval from an IRB or ethics committee before conducting
research. The IRB reviews research proposals to ensure they adhere to
ethical guidelines and protect the rights and well-being of participants.

Ethical guidelines in psychological research are designed to uphold the

welfare and rights of participants and maintain the credibility and
trustworthiness of the scientific process. Researchers have a professional
and moral responsibility to conduct their studies ethically and with
integrity, ultimately contributing to the advancement of knowledge and the
well-being of individuals and society as a whole

54
 SECTION B
[Marks: 5 x 6 = 30]
Instructions to the candidates:
a)Answer any five of the following questions in about 20 lines
b)Each question carries 6 marks.

9) Objectives of scientific research.

The objectives of scientific research are the specific goals and purposes that
guide the research process and shape its outcomes. These objectives serve
as a roadmap for researchers, providing direction and focus to their
investigations. The main objectives of scientific research include:

1. Exploration: One objective of scientific research is to explore and investigate

new areas of knowledge. This involves examining phenomena, concepts, or
theories that have not been extensively studied before. The aim is to gain a
deeper understanding of these topics and generate new insights and ideas.
2. Description: Scientific research aims to accurately describe and document
the characteristics, properties, and behaviors of phenomena under
investigation. It involves collecting and analyzing data to provide a clear and
comprehensive picture of the subject of study. Descriptive research helps
establish a baseline understanding of the phenomenon and serves as a
foundation for further investigation.
3. Explanation: Research aims to explain the causes, relationships, and
mechanisms underlying observed phenomena. It involves formulating
hypotheses and conducting systematic investigations to identify the factors
that influence or contribute to the phenomenon. Through rigorous analysis
and interpretation of data, researchers seek to uncover the underlying
principles and mechanisms that explain why things happen the way they
do.
4. Prediction: Another objective of scientific research is to develop the ability to
predict future events or outcomes based on empirical evidence. By

55
 identifying patterns, relationships, and trends in the data, researchers can
make informed predictions about the behavior or occurrence of specific
phenomena. Predictive research allows for anticipation and planning in
various fields, such as medicine, economics, and climate science.
5. Control: Scientific research aims to understand and manipulate variables to
exert control over specific phenomena or processes. This objective is
prevalent in experimental research, where researchers manipulate
independent variables to observe their effects on dependent variables. The
goal is to establish causal relationships and develop interventions or
treatments that can influence or control the phenomenon under study.
6. Application: Scientific research strives to generate practical applications and
solutions to real-world problems. Applied research focuses on addressing
specific issues or challenges in various fields, such as healthcare,
technology, education, and business. The objective is to translate scientific
findings into practical interventions, policies, or innovations that can
improve outcomes and have a positive impact on individuals and society.
7. Theory Development: Research aims to contribute to the development and
refinement of theories and conceptual frameworks that explain phenomena
within a specific discipline. The objective is to advance the knowledge base
of a particular field and provide a theoretical foundation for future research.
Theories help organize and guide research efforts and provide a framework
for understanding complex phenomena.

These objectives of scientific research are interconnected and often overlap

in practice. They collectively contribute to the growth of knowledge,
advancement of understanding, and improvement of the human condition.
By pursuing these objectives, researchers aim to expand our knowledge and
make meaningful contributions to various fields of study

10) Qualitative research.

56
 ualitative research is a research approach that focuses on exploring and
understanding the subjective experiences, perspectives, and meanings of
individuals or groups. It is a methodological approach that emphasizes in-
depth exploration, interpretation, and contextual understanding of social
phenomena. Unlike quantitative research that seeks to measure and
quantify variables, qualitative research aims to uncover rich and detailed
insights into the complexities of human behavior, beliefs, attitudes, and
social interactions.

Qualitative research involves the collection and analysis of non-numerical

data, such as interviews, observations, documents, audiovisual materials,
and textual artifacts. It relies on various techniques and methods to gather
and interpret data in a holistic and nuanced manner. Some common
methods used in qualitative research include:

1. Interviews: Researchers conduct one-on-one or group interviews to gather

in-depth information and insights from participants. Open-ended questions
are used to allow participants to express their thoughts, experiences, and
perspectives in their own words.
2. Observations: Researchers directly observe and document the behaviors,
interactions, and contexts of individuals or groups in natural settings.
Observations can be participant observation, where the researcher actively
participates in the setting, or non-participant observation, where the
researcher remains outside the observed group.
3. Focus Groups: Researchers bring together a small group of participants to
engage in structured discussions around a specific topic. Focus groups
encourage interactions and facilitate the exploration of shared experiences
and perspectives.
4. Document Analysis: Researchers analyze various documents, such as
diaries, letters, official records, newspapers, or online content, to gain

57
 insights into social phenomena or historical events. Documents provide a
rich source of qualitative data that can be examined for patterns, themes, or
discourses.
5. Case Studies: Researchers conduct an in-depth investigation of a single case
or a small number of cases to explore a particular phenomenon. Case
studies involve multiple sources of data and can provide rich and detailed
insights into complex situations or unique contexts.
6. Ethnography: Ethnography involves prolonged engagement and immersion
in a particular social setting or cultural group. Researchers observe and
interact with participants to gain a deep understanding of their beliefs,
practices, and social dynamics.

The key characteristics of qualitative research include:

1. Inductive Approach: Qualitative research follows an inductive approach,

meaning that theories or concepts emerge from the data rather than being
imposed on it beforehand. Researchers allow themes, patterns, and insights
to emerge through the analysis and interpretation of data.
2. Contextual Understanding: Qualitative research emphasizes understanding
phenomena within their natural contexts. Researchers consider the social,
cultural, and historical factors that shape individuals' experiences and
behaviors.
3. Subjective Interpretation: Qualitative research recognizes the subjective
nature of human experiences and the importance of interpretation.
Researchers interpret and make meaning of the data, acknowledging their
own perspectives and biases.
4. Flexible Design: Qualitative research designs are often flexible and evolving,
allowing researchers to adapt their methods and approaches based on
emerging findings and insights.

58
5. Data Saturation: In qualitative research, researchers strive to reach a point
of data saturation, where new data no longer provides additional insights or
perspectives. Data saturation ensures that a comprehensive understanding
of the phenomenon under study is achieved.

Qualitative research is particularly useful in exploring complex social

phenomena, gaining insights into individuals' experiences and perspectives,
understanding cultural dynamics, generating theories, and providing rich
descriptions and narratives. It complements quantitative research
approaches and is often used in interdisciplinary studies or to inform the
development of interventions or programs.

11) Case study.

A case study is a research method that involves in-depth and detailed
examination of a particular individual, group, organization, or phenomenon.
It is a qualitative research approach that aims to provide a comprehensive
understanding of the complexities, dynamics, and contextual factors
surrounding the case being studied. Case studies involve the collection and
analysis of multiple sources of data, including interviews, observations,
documents, and artifacts, to explore the case from different angles and
perspectives.

The main characteristics of a case study include:

1. Focus on a Specific Case: Case studies focus on a single case or a small

number of cases. The case can be an individual, a group, an organization, a
community, an event, or a specific situation. By focusing on a specific case,
researchers can delve deeply into the unique characteristics and intricacies
of the phenomenon under study.

59
2. In-depth Exploration: Case studies aim to provide a detailed and
comprehensive analysis of the case. Researchers collect rich and detailed
data, often using multiple methods, to gather as much information as
possible about the case. This allows for a thorough understanding of the
context, dynamics, and intricacies involved.
3. Contextual Analysis: Case studies emphasize understanding the case within
its specific context. Researchers consider the social, cultural, historical, and
environmental factors that influence the case. The contextual analysis helps
uncover the nuances and complexities of the case and provides a holistic
understanding of the phenomenon.
4. Multiple Sources of Data: Case studies involve the collection of data from
various sources to capture different aspects of the case. Data sources may
include interviews, observations, documents, archival records, and artifacts.
Using multiple data sources enhances the validity and reliability of the
findings and allows for triangulation of information.
5. Qualitative Analysis: Case studies typically involve qualitative analysis
methods to interpret and make sense of the collected data. Researchers
employ techniques such as thematic analysis, content analysis, or narrative
analysis to identify patterns, themes, and significant insights within the
data.
6. Longitudinal Perspective: In some cases, researchers conduct longitudinal
case studies, where data is collected over an extended period of time. This
longitudinal perspective enables researchers to observe and analyze
changes, developments, and processes that unfold over time.

Case studies have several strengths and applications in research:

1. In-depth Understanding: Case studies provide a detailed and comprehensive

understanding of the specific case under study. They allow researchers to

60
 explore complex phenomena in depth, capturing rich and nuanced insights
that may not be achievable through other research methods.
2. Contextual Insights: By examining the case within its specific context, case
studies uncover the contextual factors that shape the case. This provides a
deeper understanding of how social, cultural, or environmental influences
impact the phenomenon being studied.
3. Theory Development: Case studies can contribute to the development of
theories and conceptual frameworks. Through in-depth analysis, case
studies generate empirical evidence and theoretical insights that can inform
and refine existing theories or lead to the development of new ones.
4. Practical Implications: Case studies can have practical implications by
informing decision-making, policy development, or interventions in real-
world settings. Findings from case studies can provide insights and
recommendations that are specific to the case being studied and have
practical implications for similar situations.

However, case studies also have limitations:

1. Generalizability: Due to their focus on a specific case, the findings of a case

study cannot be generalized to a broader population or context. The
uniqueness of each case limits the generalizability of the findings.
2. Subjectivity: Case studies involve interpretation and analysis by the
researcher, which introduces subjectivity into the findings. Researchers'
biases and perspectives may influence the interpretation of data and the
resulting conclusions.
3. Time and Resource Intensive: Conducting a case study can be time-
consuming and resource-intensive. Gathering detailed data, conducting
interviews, and analyzing the information requires

12) Sources of research problem.

61
 The sources of research problems can come from various areas and
contexts. Here are some common sources of research problems:

1. Literature Review: A thorough review of existing literature in a specific field

can reveal gaps, inconsistencies, or unanswered questions, which can serve
as potential research problems. Identifying gaps in knowledge or conflicting
findings can motivate researchers to conduct further studies to address
these gaps or resolve the inconsistencies.
2. Practical Problems or Real-World Issues: Real-world problems or practical
challenges faced by individuals, organizations, or communities can be
sources of research problems. For example, an organization may want to
improve employee satisfaction or customer service, which can lead to
research questions related to these areas. By identifying practical problems,
researchers can develop research questions that can provide solutions or
insights to address these issues.
3. Personal Observation or Experience: Researchers may be motivated to
investigate a research problem based on their personal observations or
experiences. These observations may arise from interactions with
individuals, events, or situations that raise questions or curiosity. Personal
experiences can inspire researchers to explore a particular phenomenon in-
depth or examine the effectiveness of certain interventions or strategies.
4. Theoretical Frameworks or Paradigms: Existing theories or theoretical
frameworks can also inspire research problems. Researchers may identify
gaps or limitations in current theories and propose research questions to
refine or expand these theories. They may also adopt a new theoretical
perspective or paradigm and explore its implications on a specific
phenomenon.
5. Collaboration with Practitioners or Stakeholders: Collaborating with
practitioners, professionals, or stakeholders in a particular field can
generate research problems. Professionals working in applied settings often

62
 have firsthand knowledge of challenges, gaps, or emerging issues that
require further investigation. Through collaboration, researchers can
identify research problems that are directly relevant to the needs and
interests of practitioners or stakeholders.
6. Policy or Social Changes: Changes in policies, regulations, or societal trends
can create new research problems. For example, the legalization of cannabis
may prompt researchers to investigate its impact on health, behavior, or
society. Similarly, emerging technologies or social movements can generate
research questions related to their effects, implications, or ethical
considerations.
7. Academic Discourse and Conferences: Academic conferences, seminars, or
discussions among researchers can expose individuals to new ideas,
perspectives, or controversies, which may inspire research problems.
Engaging in scholarly conversations and debates can lead to the
identification of research gaps or alternative viewpoints that warrant further
investigation.
8. Funding Opportunities or Research Priorities: Funding agencies, research
institutions, or organizations may set research priorities or offer funding
opportunities in specific areas. Researchers may align their research
interests with these priorities or funding calls and propose research
problems that fit within the scope of these initiatives.

It is important for researchers to critically evaluate the sources of research

problems and ensure they are relevant, significant, and feasible within their
resources and expertise.

13) Hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a statement or proposition that suggests a relationship or
explanation between two or more variables. It is a tentative assumption or
prediction that guides the research process and serves as a starting point

63
 for investigation. Hypotheses are typically formulated based on existing
theories, prior research findings, or observations.

Characteristics of a good hypothesis:

1. Clear and Specific: A good hypothesis is clear and specific, clearly stating
the relationship or expected outcome between variables. It should be concise
and free from ambiguity or multiple interpretations.
2. Testable: A hypothesis should be testable through empirical research. It
should be possible to collect data and conduct experiments or observations
to determine its validity. The hypothesis should allow for the formulation of
research questions and the design of appropriate research methods.
3. Falsifiable: A good hypothesis should be falsifiable, meaning it is possible to
disprove or reject it based on empirical evidence. It should be subject to
empirical testing and potentially be proven wrong if the data contradicts it.
Falsifiability is important for the scientific rigor of the research process.
4. Based on Existing Knowledge: A hypothesis should be grounded in existing
knowledge, theories, or observations. It should build upon prior research
and contribute to the existing body of knowledge in the field. Hypotheses
that are well-supported by existing evidence are more likely to be valid and
meaningful.
5. Logical and Plausible: A good hypothesis should be logical and plausible,
based on sound reasoning and prior understanding of the subject matter. It
should align with established theories or principles and be supported by a
rationale that explains the expected relationship between variables.

Types of hypotheses:

1. Research Hypothesis: Also known as an alternative hypothesis, this type of

hypothesis predicts a specific relationship or difference between variables. It
suggests that there is a meaningful association or effect between the

64
 variables under investigation. For example, "There is a positive relationship
between exercise and mental well-being."
2. Null Hypothesis: The null hypothesis states that there is no significant
relationship or difference between variables. It represents the absence of an
effect or association. It is often used as a default hypothesis that researchers
aim to reject through their empirical analysis. For example, "There is no
relationship between caffeine consumption and sleep quality."
3. Directional Hypothesis: A directional hypothesis predicts the direction of the
relationship between variables. It suggests whether the relationship is
positive or negative. For example, "Increasing levels of stress will lead to a
decrease in job performance."
4. Non-Directional Hypothesis: A non-directional hypothesis does not specify
the expected direction of the relationship between variables. It simply
predicts the presence or absence of a relationship. For example, "There is a
relationship between age and technology usage."

Hypotheses play a crucial role in scientific research as they guide the

formulation of research questions, the design of research methods, and the
interpretation of findings. They provide a framework for researchers to
systematically investigate and explore the relationships between variables
and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in various fields.

14) Variables.
In research methodology, variables are the key elements that are measured,
manipulated, or controlled in a study. They are characteristics or attributes
that can vary or change, and they play a central role in the research
process. Variables are used to investigate relationships, test hypotheses,
and make conclusions based on empirical evidence. Here are the main types
of variables in research methodology:

65
1. Independent Variable (IV): The independent variable is the variable that is
manipulated or controlled by the researcher. It is the presumed cause or
predictor of the outcome variable. The researcher intentionally changes or
varies the levels or values of the independent variable to observe its effect on
the dependent variable. For example, in a study on the effects of different
study techniques on exam performance, the independent variable would be
the study technique (e.g., flashcards, summarization, practice tests).
2. Dependent Variable (DV): The dependent variable is the variable that is
measured or observed to determine the outcome or effect of the independent
variable. It is the variable that is presumed to be influenced by changes in
the independent variable. The dependent variable is the response or
outcome variable that researchers measure or observe. In the example
above, the dependent variable would be the exam performance (e.g., scores,
grades).
3. Moderator Variable: A moderator variable is a variable that influences the
relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable.
It affects the strength or direction of the relationship between these
variables. It explains under what conditions or for whom the relationship is
stronger or weaker. For example, in a study on the effects of caffeine on task
performance, the level of sleep deprivation could act as a moderator variable.
It could influence the relationship between caffeine intake (independent
variable) and task performance (dependent variable).
4. Mediator Variable: A mediator variable explains the mechanism or process
through which the independent variable affects the dependent variable. It
mediates or serves as an intermediate step between the independent and
dependent variables. It helps to understand the underlying processes or
pathways that link the variables. For example, in a study on the effects of
job satisfaction on employee performance, job engagement could act as a

66
 mediator variable, explaining how job satisfaction influences employee
performance.
5. Control Variables: Control variables are variables that are held constant or
controlled by the researcher to reduce the influence of confounding factors.
They are variables that are not the primary focus of the study but can have
an impact on the relationship between the independent and dependent
variables. By controlling these variables, researchers can isolate and
attribute changes in the dependent variable to the independent variable with
more confidence.

Understanding and properly defining variables is essential in research

methodology as they provide the basis for study design, data collection, and
analysis. By carefully selecting and defining variables, researchers can
investigate relationships, test hypotheses, and draw meaningful conclusions
from their research.

15) Randomised group design.

Randomized group design is a research design commonly used in
experimental studies to examine the effects of an independent variable on a
dependent variable. It involves randomly assigning participants to different
groups or conditions, manipulating the independent variable in one or more
groups, and comparing the outcomes or responses between the groups. The
random assignment of participants to groups helps ensure that any
differences observed between groups are due to the manipulation of the
independent variable and not pre-existing differences among participants.

Here are the key features and steps involved in a randomized group design:

1. Random Assignment: Participants in the study are randomly assigned to

different groups or conditions. Random assignment helps distribute

67
 potential confounding factors equally across groups, increasing the
likelihood that any observed differences between groups are due to the
independent variable and not other factors.
2. Control Group: One group in the study serves as the control group, which
does not receive the intervention or manipulation of the independent
variable. The control group provides a baseline against which the effects of
the independent variable can be compared.
3. Experimental Group(s): One or more groups in the study receive the
intervention or manipulation of the independent variable. The experimental
groups are exposed to the condition or treatment being studied.
4. Pretesting: Before the intervention or manipulation of the independent
variable, participants in all groups may be assessed on the dependent
variable to establish a baseline measure.
5. Intervention or Manipulation: The independent variable is manipulated or
applied to the experimental group(s) while being withheld from the control
group. The manipulation can involve various techniques, such as
administering a treatment, exposing participants to specific conditions, or
providing certain instructions.
6. Posttesting: After the intervention or manipulation, participants in all
groups are assessed on the dependent variable again to measure the
outcomes or responses. The posttest data are then compared between the
control and experimental groups to evaluate the effects of the independent
variable.

Advantages of Randomized Group Design:

 Random assignment helps minimize bias and ensures the groups are
comparable at the outset.
 Allows for causal inference as any observed differences between groups can
be attributed to the independent variable.

68
 Provides a strong basis for making cause-and-effect conclusions.
 Enhances internal validity by controlling for confounding variables.

Disadvantages of Randomized Group Design:

 May be challenging or unethical to implement in certain situations, such as

when studying long-term effects or sensitive populations.
 Limited generalizability to real-world settings, as the conditions in the study
are often controlled and may not fully reflect natural environments.
 Practical limitations, such as time, cost, and availability of participants.

Randomized group design is a widely used and effective research design for
investigating causal relationships between variables. By randomly assigning
participants to groups and manipulating the independent variable,
researchers can draw stronger conclusions about the effects of
interventions, treatments, or conditions on the dependent variable.

16) One-group design.

The one-group design, also known as a pretest-posttest design or single-

group pretest-posttest design, is a research design used to evaluate the
effects of an intervention or treatment on a single group of participants. In
this design, the group is measured on the dependent variable both before
and after the intervention, allowing for a comparison of the participants' pre-
intervention and post-intervention scores.

Here are the key features and steps involved in a one-group design:

1. Pretesting: Participants are initially assessed on the dependent variable

before the intervention or treatment is introduced. The pretest provides a
baseline measure of the participants' initial level on the variable of interest.

69
2. Intervention or Treatment: The intervention or treatment is then
administered to the group. This can involve various techniques, such as
providing training, therapy, educational programs, or any other
manipulation intended to produce a change in the participants.
3. Posttesting: After a period of time following the intervention, participants are
assessed on the dependent variable again. The posttest measures the
participants' scores or outcomes after they have received the intervention.
4. Comparison: The pretest and posttest scores of the group are compared to
determine whether there have been any changes or improvements in the
dependent variable as a result of the intervention.

Advantages of One-Group Design:

 Simplicity: The one-group design is straightforward and easy to implement.

 Cost-effective: It typically requires fewer resources and time compared to
designs involving multiple groups.
 Initial assessment: The pretest allows for the measurement of participants'
initial level on the dependent variable, providing a baseline for comparison.

Disadvantages of One-Group Design:

 Lack of control group: The absence of a control group makes it difficult to

determine whether any observed changes in the dependent variable are truly
attributable to the intervention. Other factors, such as time, maturation, or
history, could also contribute to the observed differences.
 Internal validity concerns: Without a control group, it is challenging to
establish a causal relationship between the intervention and the observed
changes.
 Threats to validity: The design is susceptible to threats such as testing
effects, regression to the mean, and participant biases.

70
 The one-group design is often used in exploratory or preliminary studies, or
when it is not feasible or ethical to include a control group. While it has
limitations in terms of internal validity and establishing causality, it can still
provide valuable insights into the effects of an intervention on a single group
of participants. Researchers should be cautious in interpreting the results
and consider additional designs, such as controlled experiments, to
strengthen the validity of their findings.

17) Interview.
In research methodology, an interview is a data collection method that
involves direct interaction between the researcher and the participant to
gather information and insights about a research topic. It is a qualitative
research technique that allows for in-depth exploration of individuals'
perspectives, experiences, opinions, and attitudes.

Types of Interviews:

1. Structured Interviews: In structured interviews, the researcher follows a

predetermined set of questions and a standardized format. The questions
are asked in the same order and manner to ensure consistency across
participants. This type of interview allows for efficient data collection and
comparison between participants.
2. Semi-Structured Interviews: Semi-structured interviews involve a flexible
interview guide with a set of predetermined questions but also allow for
probing and follow-up questions based on the participant's responses. It
provides a balance between standardized questions and the opportunity to
explore participants' unique perspectives and experiences.
3. Unstructured Interviews: Unstructured interviews are more open-ended,
with no predetermined set of questions. The conversation flows naturally,
allowing participants to freely express their thoughts and experiences. The

71
 researcher may have general topics to guide the discussion but relies on the
participant's responses to shape the direction of the interview.

Advantages of Interviews:

1. In-depth information: Interviews allow for detailed and rich information

about participants' experiences, perceptions, and attitudes. Researchers can
delve deeper into topics, explore nuances, and gain a comprehensive
understanding of the research area.
2. Flexibility: Interviews offer flexibility in adapting the questions and approach
based on the participant's responses. Researchers can probe further, ask
follow-up questions, or explore unexpected themes that arise during the
interview.
3. Participant engagement: Interviews provide an opportunity for participants
to actively engage in the research process. It allows them to share their
perspectives and experiences in their own words, fostering a sense of
ownership and collaboration.
4. Contextual understanding: Interviews conducted in natural settings provide
insights into the context and environment that influence participants'
experiences. This context-specific information adds depth and richness to
the data.

Disadvantages of Interviews:

1. Time and resource-intensive: Interviews require significant time and effort to

plan, conduct, and analyze. They can be time-consuming, especially when
dealing with a large sample size or complex research questions.
2. Subjectivity: The interviewer's presence and influence can introduce biases,
such as social desirability or interviewer bias, which may impact the
responses. Researchers need to establish rapport and trust to minimize
these biases.

72
3. Limited generalizability: Interviews typically involve a small number of
participants, making it challenging to generalize the findings to a larger
population. The focus is often on understanding individual experiences
rather than making broad generalizations.
4. Response validity: Participants may provide socially desirable or biased
responses, which can affect the accuracy and validity of the data collected.
Careful consideration of the interview environment and rapport-building
techniques can help mitigate this issue.

Interviews are valuable in exploring complex topics, capturing individual

perspectives, and gaining a deep understanding of participants' experiences.
They offer researchers the opportunity to collect rich and nuanced data that
cannot be easily obtained through other methods. However, researchers
should carefully plan and conduct interviews to minimize biases and ensure
the reliability and validity of the findings.

18) Plagiarism.

Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's ideas, words, or work without
proper attribution or acknowledgment, presenting it as one's own. It is
considered an ethical violation and a serious academic offense in which the
original author's intellectual property rights are infringed upon. Plagiarism
can occur in various forms, including:

1. Copying verbatim: Using someone else's exact words without quotation

marks or proper citation.
2. Paraphrasing without attribution: Rewriting someone else's work in your
own words but without giving credit to the original source.
3. Unauthorized collaboration: Submitting work that was done in collaboration
with others without disclosing their contributions.

73
4. Self-plagiarism: Reusing one's own previously published work without
proper citation or permission.

The consequences of plagiarism can be significant and can vary depending

on the institution or context. Some common consequences include:

1. Academic penalties: Educational institutions have strict policies against

plagiarism and may impose penalties such as failing grades, academic
probation, suspension, or even expulsion.
2. Legal consequences: Plagiarism can infringe upon copyright laws, leading to
potential legal action and financial liabilities.
3. Damage to reputation: Plagiarism tarnishes the reputation of the individual
or institution involved and can lead to a loss of trust and credibility within
the academic and research community.

To avoid plagiarism, it is important to follow ethical practices and give

proper credit to the original sources. Here are some strategies to prevent
plagiarism:

1. Cite your sources: Whenever you use information, ideas, or direct quotes
from a source, provide proper citations following the appropriate citation
style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago). This includes both in-text citations and a
comprehensive reference list or bibliography.
2. Understand paraphrasing: When paraphrasing, restate the original ideas in
your own words, but still give credit to the original source. Be careful not to
copy the original sentence structure or vocabulary too closely.
3. Use quotation marks: When directly quoting someone's words, use quotation
marks and provide the necessary citation.
4. Manage your references: Keep track of all the sources you use during your
research and organize them properly. This will help you accurately attribute
ideas and avoid accidental plagiarism.

74
5. Understand collaboration guidelines: If you collaborate with others on a
project, make sure to understand and adhere to the collaboration guidelines
set by your institution or supervisor.
6. Use plagiarism detection tools: There are various plagiarism detection tools
available, such as Turnitin and Grammarly, which can help you identify
potential instances of plagiarism in your work. These tools compare your
text against a vast database of published works to highlight any similarities.

By practicing proper citation and attribution, researchers can maintain

academic integrity, respect intellectual property rights, and contribute to the
advancement of knowledge and scholarship in an ethical manner.

75