Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

SCHOOL OF LEGAL STUDIES

DEPARTMENT OF LAW
COURSE NAME: CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE COURSE CODE: I.L. -C- 703

ASSIGNMENT ON:
JOINDER OF CHARGES
[ SECTION 218 -224]

Submitted With Regards,


To,

QAISAR IQBAL
TEACHING FACULTY
Department of Law, School of Legal Studies, Central University of
Kashmir.

PREPARED & SUBMITTED BY:


Name: Sheikh Mohsin Farooq

Er. No.: 2007CUKMR30

Semester: 7th (Seventh)

Course: B.A. LLB (5 Yrs.)

E-mail: sheikhmoshin2861@icloud.com

Phones: +91 7006301336


What is a Charge?
The charge is defined under Section 2(b) of the Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973. According to
which, “charges mean the head of the charge when there are more than one charges”. To put it in a more
straightforward language, after the trial is initiated, the accused person is informed about the allegations which
have been raised against him and the provisions of the Code under which he would be tried by the Court. The
accusations put up against the accused are thus known as ‘Charges’ in the legal language.

The basic purpose of the charge is to let the accused know for which offence he is charged so that he can
prepare his defence on that basis. The charges should be informed to the accused at the very beginning. Every
individual has an equal opportunity to prepare his defence and avail justice. In the serious offences, the statute
requires that the charge should be written down clearly and precisely and read out to the accused and explained
with clarity.

INTRODUCTION
The joinder of charges is a procedural tool within criminal law that facilitates the amalgamation of
numerous charges levelled against a single accused party into a unified trial. This pivotal legal concept serves
as a cornerstone in the effective dispensation of justice, as it not only optimizes the efficiency of court
proceedings but also upholds the principles of fairness and equity for both the defendant and the prosecution. 1
This analytical exploration embarks upon a comprehensive examination of the multifaceted dimensions
surrounding joinder of charges, encompassing its foundational underpinnings, delineated exceptions, far-
reaching implications, and nuanced application within the intricate framework of the criminal justice system.

“A separate trial is a rule while a joint trial is its exception”.

LEGAL BASIS
The joinder of charges finds its legal basis primarily in statutory provisions laid down in criminal
procedure codes and case law interpretations. In many jurisdictions, including India, specific sections within
the criminal procedure code delineate the principles and procedures governing joinder of charges.

Section 218

Indian Criminal Procedure Code mandates a separate charge for each distinct offense, unless certain
exceptions apply. Additionally, case law, particularly judgments by higher courts such as the Supreme Court,
play a significant role in interpreting and elucidating the principles underlying joinder of charges.

Section 219
1
SEC Throws Wrench In SPAC Boom: Here’s How Opportune Can… | Opportune. https://opportune.com/insights/news/sec-throws-wrench-in-
spac-boom-heres-how-opportune-can-help/
In the case where an individual is charged for three offence which is of the same kind and punished
with the same amount of punishment under the same section of Indian Penal code,1860 within a year, then the
accused can be tried at one trial for the offence not more than three.

Section 220

According to the section when the accused is charged with an offence forming a series of acts and the
acts are part of the same transaction and more than one offence is committed by such series of acts then the
accused may be charged and tried for all the offences in one trial.

Section 221
In cases where it’s not clear that for which offences the accused will be charged for a single act or series
of acts, then in such situation the accused can be charged for committing All offences or Any of such offence.
The accused shall be tried for such charges in one trial or he can be tried for an alternate offence having
committed someone of the said offences.
Section 222
It deals with the circumstances under which an accused can be convicted of an offence of which he was
not charged at the beginning of the trial.
Section 223
The section provides the types of persons who can be charged jointly, such as accused persons who
have committed the same offence in the course of same transaction etc.2
Section 224
The section deals with the withdrawal of remaining charges when one of the several charges has
received a conviction.

PRINCIPLES GOVERNING JOINDER OF CHARGES


The overarching principle governing joinder of charges is the balance between procedural efficiency
and the protection of the accused's rights. While consolidation of charges expedites court proceedings and
minimizes judicial resources' wastage, it must not prejudice the accused's right to a fair trial. Therefore, the
following principles are crucial in determining when joinder of charges is permissible:

Distinct Offences: The Offences joined in a single trial must be distinct, meaning they are not interrelated or
part of the same transaction. This principle ensures clarity and prevents confusion in the presentation of
evidence and legal arguments.

Judicial Discretion: Courts have discretionary power to allow joinder of charges based on the circumstances
of each case. This discretion is exercised judiciously to prevent unfairness or prejudice to either party.

2
An Explanation to Joinder of Charges in CrPc w.r.t Section 218, 223, 224. https://blog.ipleaders.in/joinder-charges-crpc/
Protection of Rights: The accused's rights, including the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence, and
the right to present a defense, must be safeguarded throughout the joinder process.3

In the case of K. Satwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1960), sections of joinder of charges are not
compelling. They only permit the joint trial of charges under certain circumstances, and the courts may
consider the same in the interest of the administration of justice after thoroughly studying the facts and
circumstances of each case.4

EXCEPTIONS TO SEPARATE CHARGES


While Section 218 of the Indian Criminal Procedure Code mandates separate charges for distinct
Offences, several exceptions permit joinder of charges under specific circumstances. These exceptions are
designed to balance the need for separate trials with the practical considerations of judicial efficiency. Some
common exceptions include:

Offences Committed in the Same Transaction: Charges arising from a single series of acts or the same
transaction may be joined in a single trial to avoid duplication of evidence and testimony.

Related Offences: Offences that are closely related or arise out of the same factual circumstances may be
consolidated to ensure a comprehensive and efficient adjudication of the case.

Doubtful Offences: When it is unclear which offense has been committed, the accused may be charged with
all possible Offences arising from the same set of facts, allowing the court to determine the appropriate charges
based on the evidence presented.

IMPLICATIONS OF JOINDER OF CHARGES


The joinder of charges has significant implications for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as
the judicial process as a whole. Some key implications include:

Efficiency: Consolidating charges into a single trial promotes judicial efficiency by reducing the number of
hearings, witnesses, and evidentiary proceedings required.

Fairness: While efficiency is crucial, fairness to the accused remains paramount. Joinder of charges should not
unduly prejudice the accused or compromise their ability to mount a defense against each individual charge.

Complexity: Consolidating multiple charges into a single trial may increase the complexity of the proceedings,
requiring careful case management by the presiding judge to ensure a fair and orderly trial.

Judicial Economy: Joinder of charges conserves judicial resources by avoiding repetitive proceedings and
expediting the resolution of multiple charges against a single accused.

3
Василенко, В.О. "The Right to a Fair Trial: Criminal Limb." 2019.
4
All you need to know about ‘charge’ under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - iPleaders. https://blog.ipleaders.in/need-know-charge-criminal-
procedure-code-1973/?noamp=mobile
APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS RELATED TO JOINDER OF CHARGES IN CASES WHERE NO CHARGE HAS BEEN FORMALLY MADE

It is not necessary in the summons cases to frame a formal charge. Mere stating to the accused the
particulars of the offences which he has been charged with would suffice5. In such cases, the question related to
the applicability of provisions of joinder of charges arises. Such a question has not been expressly dealt with by
the Code of CriminalProcedure, 1973. But it has been established via a number of precedents like in the case of
Upendra Nath Biswasv. Emperor ILR (1913) 41 CaL 694, Indramani v. Chanda Bewa 1956 Cri LJ 1218 that
the provisions of joinder of cases are equally applicable to the summons case also.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION
In practice, the application of joinder of charges requires careful consideration of the specific facts and
circumstances of each case.6 Prosecutors must weigh the benefits of consolidation against the risk of prejudice
to the accused, while defense counsel must vigorously defend against each individual charge while navigating
the complexities of a consolidated trial. Judges play a pivotal role in balancing these competing interests,
ensuring that the trial remains fair, efficient, and in accordance with the principles of justice.

CONCLUSION
The joinder of charges is a vital procedural mechanism in criminal law that facilitates the efficient
administration of justice while safeguarding the rights of the accused. Grounded in statutory provisions and
legal principles, joinder of charges balances the need for judicial efficiency with the imperative of fairness and
due process. Understanding the principles, exceptions, and implications of joinder of charges is essential for
legal practitioners, scholars, and policymakers involved in the criminal justice system to ensure that justice is

served effectively and fairly.

5
An Explanation to Joinder of Charges in CrPc w.r.t Section 218, 223, 224. https://blog.ipleaders.in/joinder-charges-crpc/
6
SEC Throws Wrench In SPAC Boom: Here’s How Opportune Can… | Opportune. https://opportune.com/insights/news/sec-throws-wrench-in-
spac-boom-heres-how-opportune-can-help/

You might also like