Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis of The Envelope Correlation Coefficient o
Analysis of The Envelope Correlation Coefficient o
2020
https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2020.20.2.83
ISSN 2671-7263 (Online) ∙ ISSN 2671-7255 (Print)
Abstract
Inserting a suspended line is a widely used technique to reduce the envelope correlation coefficients (ECC) of multiple-input multiple-
output (MIMO) antennas, but its ECC reduction mechanism has not been carefully investigated so far. In this paper, MIMO antenna
pairs connected with different suspended lines were evaluated using a full-wave simulation and measurement results. We calculated the
surface current density at the center of the suspended line inserted between the antenna elements and found that the derivative of the
surface current density was closely related to the ECC values. Furthermore, parametric studies showed that the suspended line length
determines the ECC reduction bandwidth of the MIMO antenna, and the antenna length controls the ECC minimum frequency point.
These guidelines provide useful insights into designing a low ECC MIMO antenna employing a suspended line.
Key Words: Envelope Correlation Coefficient, Microstrip Line, MIMO Antenna, Surface Current Density, Suspended Line.
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ⓒ Copyright The Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science. All Rights Reserved.
83
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, VOL. 20, NO. 2, APR. 2020
84
KIM and CHUNG: ANALYSIS OF THE ENVELOPE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT OF MIMO ANTENNAS CONNECTED WITH SUSPENDED LINES
S11 [dB]
L2 4
L3 27.7
L4 30
W1 1.5
W2 5
W3 4
W4 1.5
W5 5 (a)
W6 3
S21 [dB]
(b)
(a) (b)
Fig. 4. Comparisons of the S-parameter results between the simula-
Fig. 3. Pictures of the fabricated prototype antennas fed by 50 Ω
tions and measurements of the prototype antennas: (a) S11
coaxial cables: (a) high ECC model and (b) low ECC model.
and (b) S12 results.
85
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, VOL. 20, NO. 2, APR. 2020
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6. Comparison of the ECC between the simulation and meas-
urement results of the prototype antenna: (a) high ECC
model and (b) low ECC model.
value at 0.8 GHz is 0.69 for the low ECC model (Fig. 6(b)). At (b)
0.8 GHz, the measured ECC value at 0.8 GHz is only 0.076 Fig. 7. Surface current density calculation point for the (a) high
and shows a broader frequency range exhibiting the null. ECC model and (b) low ECC model.
86
KIM and CHUNG: ANALYSIS OF THE ENVELOPE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT OF MIMO ANTENNAS CONNECTED WITH SUSPENDED LINES
(a)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 9. Design parameters for parametric studies: (a) high ECC
model and (b) low ECC model.
87
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, VOL. 20, NO. 2, APR. 2020
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
1 1 1
| |
| |
0 0 0
0.4 0.4 0.4
-1 -1 -1
0.2 0.2 0.2
Sim. ECC Sim. ECC Sim. ECC
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1))
0 -2 0 -2 0 -2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz]
(a) (b) (c)
10-6 10-6 10-6
1 2 1 2 1 2
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
1 1 1
| |
| |
0 0 0
0.4 0.4 0.4
-1 -1 -1
0.2 0.2 0.2
Sim. ECC Sim. ECC Sim. ECC
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1))
0 -2 0 -2 0 -2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz]
(d) (e) (f)
Fig. 10. Variation of the ECC and the derivative of 𝐽 according to the change in design parameters of the high ECC model. (a) L =
25.5 mm, (b) L = 27.5 mm, (c) L = 29.5 mm, (d) YY = 5.5 mm, (e) YY = 7.5 mm, (f) YY = 9.5 mm.
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
1 1 1
0
| |
| |
0 0
0.4 0.4 0.4
-1 -1 -1
0.2 0.2 0.2
Sim. ECC Sim. ECC Sim. ECC
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1))
0 -2 0 -2 0 -2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz]
(a) (b) (c)
-6 -6
10 10 10-6
1 2 1 2 1 2
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf)
1 1 1
| |
| |
0 0 0
0.4 0.4 0.4
-1 -1 -1
0.2 0.2 0.2
Sim. ECC Sim. ECC Sim. ECC
d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1)) d/df(C.Mag Jsurf(Point1))
0 -2 0 -2 0 -2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz] Frequency [GHz]
(d) (e) (f)
Fig. 11. Variation of the ECC and the surface current, which is differentiated in terms of frequency according to the change in the design
parameters of the low ECC model. (a) L = 23.7 mm, (b) L = 25.7 mm, (c) L = 27.7 mm, (d) YY = 12.5 mm, (e) YY = 14.5 mm,
(f) YY = 16.5 mm.
Fig. 11(d), (e), and (f) show the variation of the ECC and the widens from 100 MHz to 140 MHz. From the parametric
derivative of 𝐽 according to the change in YY. As YY in- study results of the two models for the design variable YY, the
creases, the bandwidth around the null of the two indicators length of the suspended line determines the low ECC band-
88
KIM and CHUNG: ANALYSIS OF THE ENVELOPE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT OF MIMO ANTENNAS CONNECTED WITH SUSPENDED LINES
89
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, VOL. 20, NO. 2, APR. 2020
antennas with negative group delay," Progress In Electro- telecommunications system diversity terminals," IET Mi-
magnetics Research, vol. 22, pp. 151-163, 2011. crowaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 93-101,
[14] A. Diallo, C. Luxey, P. Le Thuc, R. Staraj, and G. Kossiavas, 2008.
"Enhanced two‐antenna structures for universal mobile
90