Volume 2 Part II Final SSP 4675

Report No.
CRRI/QSP/BES/01/SSP-4675/02
Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section

on NH-8A from Km 001+960 to km 117+600 in the State of
Gujarat
Final Report Volume-2
Part-II Major and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed condition
Sponsored by:
Porbandar Tollway Pvt. Limited
Rajkot
Bridge Engineering & Structures

CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi-110025
August, 2022
CSIR-CRRI Report No. CRRI/QSP/BES/01/SSP-4675/02
Director Dr. Ranjana Aggarwal
Head of the Division Dr. Rajeev Goel

Project Leade r Ganesh Kumar Sahu
PROJECT TEAM
Rajeev Garg (Dr.)
S S Gaharwar
Rajeev Goel (Dr.)
J K Goyal
V V L K Rao (Dr.)
Kanwar Singh(Dr.)
M K Meena
D. P .Golla
Naveet Kaur (Dr.)
Pradeep Kumar
Y K Singh
Rajesh Rana
Kumar Shashi Bhushan
Prateek Sharma
A Nrayan Rao
Sudhansu Bhagat
Dinesh Kumar Mandal
Om Kumar
Vijay Kumar
Rajveer Singh
Chirag Kapoor
Happy Kumar Mahawar
Sunil Kumar
Chandan Kumar
i
DISCLAIMER
All the information furnished in this report is based on the Visual Inspection, NDT and
other tests, carried out on structures and laboratory tests by the CSIR-Central Road Research
Institute (CRRI), New Delhi. The responsibility of CRRI is limited to the technical and scientific
matters contained in this report.
Any use of the findings of the report without the permission of the CRRI by any other agency
or person other than the client M/s Porbandar Tollway Pvt. Limited, Rajkot is solely at their own risk
and responsibility.
ii
FOREWORD
This report entitled, “Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section

on NH-8A from Km 001+960 to km 117+600 in the State of Gujarat” deals with the Detailed
Visual Inspection, Non-Destructive Test, Laboratory Test etc and remedial measures for the
distressed members as per prevailing guidelines of IRC: SP-18, IRC: SP-35, IRC: SP-40 and other
related codes of IRC, MORTH, ACI 562-21 and EN-1504 etc. of the structures.
Load Test also carried out in the two end spans of rehabilitated major bridge at Ch
114+759(LHS) and the % recovery observed were found satisfactory. Severe cracks have been seen
on the deck slabs in some of the structures which require urgent action on priority basis to
rehabilitate/strengthen/recast of the affected area as detailed in the present report Volume 2 (Part-II:
Major and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed Condition). Rehabilitation measures have to be
adopted in piers, abutment, girders, diaphragms walls, deck slabs in some of the bridges. There is
also need of replacement of drainage spouts, railings and expansion joints rubber seals in some of
the structures. The project report comprises of the following two volumes:
Volume-1: Main Report comprises of Visual Inspection of Structures, NDT and other
tests, observations & brief findings on study of all structures and
Methodology of repair/rehabilitation.
Volume-2: Detailed Report on Condition and remedial measures of Structures
Part-I : Rehabilitated Major Bridge at Ch 114+759(LHS)
Part-II :Major and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed condition
Part-III :Major and minor Bridges with minor Repair / Rehabilitation
This report Part-II Volume-2 is a Detailed Report on the Condition and remedial measures of Major
and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed conditions.
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
M/s Safeway Concessions, Porbandar-Jetpur Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Rajkot, Gujarat vide letter
No. PJTPL/CRRI dated 15th March, 2021 requested CRRI for “Inspection of structures of 4–
Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section on NH-8A from Km 001+960 to km 117+600 in the State
of Gujarat”. CRRI offer dated 22/06/2021was accepted by M/s Safeway Concessions, Porbandar-
Jetpur Tollway Pvt. Ltd, Rajkot.
Accordingly, CRRI team visited all the structures from 4th August to 21st August, 2021. The
structures had been constructed in the year 2006-08 about 15 years back with carriageway width
7.50m to 11.0m. The super structures comprises of simply supported/continuous deck of RCC T-
beam girders, Solid slab, Voided Slab, Box girders etc. Sag in some of the spans in a few structures is
clearly visible. Some of the structures are partly strengthened and require further repair/rehabilitation
measures.
This project deals with the Detailed Visual Inspection, Non-Destructive Test, Load Test,
Laboratory Test etc and remedial measures for the distressed members of all the structures as per
prevailing guidelines of IRC: SP-18, IRC: SP-35, IRC:SP-40 and other related codes of IRC,
MORTH, ACI 562-21 and EN-1504 etc of the structures.
Severe cracks have been seen on the deck slabs in some o f the structures which require urgent
action on priority basis to rehabilitate/strengthen/recast of the affected area as detailed in the present
report Volume 2 (Part-II: Major and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed Condition). Rehabilitation
measures have to be adopted in piers, abutment, girders, diaphragms walls, deck slabs in some of the
bridges. There is also need of replacement of drainage spouts, railings and expansion joints rubber
seals in some of the structures. The project report comprises of the following two volumes:
This report Part-II Volume-2 is a Detailed Report on the Condition and remedial measures of Major
and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed conditions.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank M/s Porbandar Tollway Pvt. Ltd., Rajkot for sponsoring the
project, “Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section on NH-8A from
Km 001+960 to km 117+600 in the State of Gujarat”. We wish to record our appreciation to the
Project Director, PIU Rajkot for the co-operation extended to the CRRI team during inspection and
testing at the project site. We would also like to convey our thanks to representative of authority
Engineers and M/s Porbandar Tollway Pvt. Ltd., Rajkot for their co-operation in various activities
during the site Inspection and testing of Structures.
Thanks are also due to all the CSIR-CRRI officials who have directly or indirectly helped in
carrying out the various activities related to this project work.
v
Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section on NH-8A from Km

001+960 to km 117+600 in the State of Gujarat
Main Report (Volume-1)
PROJECT TEAM ..................................................................................................................................i
DISCLAIMER...................................................................................................................................... ii
FOREWORD....................................................................................................................................... iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................v
1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................................................................2
3.0 DETAILS PROVIDED BY CLIENT ......................................................................................3
4.0 VISUAL INSPECTION OF DISTRESSED STRUCTURES AND REHABILITATION
MEASURES ........................................................................................................................................12
4.1 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage 18+432(LHS) .......12
4.4 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487 (RHS) ......41
4.5 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS) .......52
4.6 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Major Bridge at Chainage 30+345(LHS) .......60
4.8 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS) .91
4.9 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)103
4.13 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Chainage 47+053(LHS)142
4.17 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage 54+590(RHS)183
vi
4.23 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage -58+724(RHS)235
4.26 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Chainage -60+543(RHS)255
4.28 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Chainage -67+975(LHS)284
4.31 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage -77+862(LHS)314
4.32 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage -78+224(LHS)324
4.36 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS)........366
5.0 REHABILITATION STRATEGIES ..................................................................................375
6.0 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................376
6.1 General Suggestions for Implementation............................................................................377
REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................377
vii
Report No. CRRI/QSP/BES/01/SSP-4675/02
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section on NH-

8A from Km 001+960 to km 117+600 in the State of Gujarat
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/s Safeway Concessions, Porbandar-Jetpur Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Rajkot, Gujarat
vide letter No. PJTPL/CRRI dated 15th March, 2021 requested CRRI for
“Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section on NH-8A
from Km 001+960 to km 117+600 in the State of Gujarat”. CRRI offer dated
22/06/2021was accepted by M/s Safeway Concessions, Porbandar-Jetpur Tollway
Pvt. Ltd, Rajkot.
Accordingly, CRRI team visited all the structures from 4th August to 21st August,
2021. The structures had been constructed in the year 2006-08, about 15 years back
with carriageway width 7.50m to 11.0m. The super structures comprises of simply
supported/continuous deck of RCC T- beam girders, Solid slab, Voided Slab, Box
girders. Sag in some of the spans in a few structures is clearly visible. Some of the
structures are partly strengthened and require further repair/rehabilitation.
This project deals with the Detailed Visual Inspection, Non-Destructive Test, Load
Test, Laboratory Test etc and remedial measures for the distressed members of all
the structures as per prevailing guidelines of IRC: SP-18, IRC: SP-35, IRC: SP-40
and other related codes of IRC, MORTH, ACI 562-19 and EN-1504 etc of the
structures.
There are severe cracks seen on the deck slab in some of the bridges which require
urgent action on priority basis to rehabilitate/strengthen/recast of the affected area
to avoid any accident due to shear punching of deck slab. The list of 36 distressed
structures along with observations has been informed for urgent action for the safe
movement of the traffic vide CRRI letter no. CRRI/BES/Safeway
Concession/Porbandar-Jetpur/02 dated 06/09/2021. Strengthening measures have to
be also adopted for the several structures for their various components such as
piers, abutment, girders, diaphragms walls, deck slab, box girder, solid slab, voided
slabs and drainage spout etc.
Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 1

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Based on the visual inspection of the structures, test results of random NDT, other
tests, and suggestions for remedial measures for the defects on structures, a
comprehensive Report is prepared. The report comprises of the following two
volumes:
Volume-1: Report comprises of Visual Inspection of Structures, NDT and
other tests, observations & brief findings on study of all structures
and Methodology of repair/rehabilitation.

Part-III :Major and minor Bridges with minor Repair /
Rehabilitation
The present report Volume-2: Detailed Report on Condition and remedial measures
of Structures; Part-II-Major and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed conditions
deal with the observations on the basis of visual inspection & test results and
remedial measures to be taken up for the 36 numbers of identified minor/major
distressed bridges as per Table-3 in the main report in Volume-1.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

The following scope of work was agreed upon between M/s Safeway
Concessions, Porbandar-Jetpur Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Rajkot and CRRI in respect of
the 12 major bridges and 75 minor bridges:
 Detailed Visual inspection of the Bridge including distress mapping as per
prevailing guidelines of IRC: SP-18, IRC: SP-35 and other related codes of
IRC and MORTH etc.
 Review of available Technical Documents.
 Non-Destructive Testing
 Core Test
 Load Test and vibration test if required
 Analysis of test data collected
 As per the condition of the various element of structures and test results
Suggestions for Rehabilitation Measures

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.0 DETAILS PROVIDED BY CLIENT

M/s Porbandar-Jetpur Tollway Pvt. Ltd. Rajkot, provided the list of major and
minor bridges to be inspected as detailed in Table -1 and Table-2. Drawings of
structures could not be located and requested by M/s PJTPL, Rajkot with Project
Director, NHAI, PIU Rajkot for the availability of the same. It is informed that the
structures had been constructed in the year 2006-08 about 15 years back with
carriageway width 7.50m to 11.0m. The super structures comprises of simply
supported/continuous deck of RCC T- beam girders, Solid slab, Voided Slab, Box
girders.
CRRI team carried out random measurement of structural components of some
of the structures at site for the load response and analysis of the structures.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Table -1: List of Major Bridge for Inspection in Jetpur-Porbandar Section in Gujarat
S. No . River Name Side Span Arrange Total Deck Footpath Ty pe of Typ e of Type of Ye ar of
Carriage
Chainage ment (m) Length, Width, Supe r- Construction
way (m) Substructure Foundation
(m) (m) structure
(km) Width(m)
6x30.50
1 30+345 Bileshvari River LHS 183 7.5 10.3 1.5 Box Girde r RC C O pe n Foun dation 2007
Voide d
2 47+053 Bhadar River LHS 6x22.32 134 7.5 10 .3 1.5 slab RC C O pen Foundation 2008
Voide d O pen
3 060 + 543 Venu River RHS 3x21.10 63.3 7.5 10 1.5 Slab RCC foundation 2008
Voided Well
4 067+047 Venu River· RHS 8 X 19.40 155. 2 7. 5 10 1.5 Slab RCC 2008
foundation
Voide d
1. 5 Slab
5 067+975 Venu River LHS 9 X 22 .0 198 7.5 10 5 RCC Existing 2008
1. 5
078+687 Moj Ri ver LHS 6 X 24.0() 144 7. 5 10. 3 Box RCC O pe n foundation 2008
6
Girde r
O pe n
7 078 + 68 7 Moj Ri ver RHS 6 X 24.00 144 7. 5 10.3 1. 5 Box Girde r RC C 2008
foundation
1 x 10.60+ Voided
8 087+125 Utavali River LHS 74.5 7. 5 10.3 1.5 Slab RCC O pe n foundation 2008
3 X 21 . 30
2008
9 088+ 152 Bhadar River LHS 12x 10 .60 127. 2 11 12 No Solid Slab RC C O pen foundation
We ll
2008
10 089 + 66 I Bhadar River RHS 6 X 25.00 150 7. 5 I 0. 3 1.5 Box Girde r RCC
founda1ion
O pe n foundation 2008
11 091 +655 Bhadar River RHS 10 X 2 5.00 250 7.4 10. 3 1. 5 Box Girde r RCC
Open
7.5 RCC 2008
12 114 + 7 59 Bhadar· River LHS 10 X 27 .00 270 I 0. 3 1.5 Box Gir de r foundation

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Table -2: List of Minor Bridge for Inspection in Jetpur-Porbandar S ection in Gujarat
Span Carriage
S. Chainage Arrange Total way Deck Footpath Type of Type of Ye ar of
Type of
ment, (m) Length, Width,(m) Width, Supe r Sub Construction
No. (km) Side (m) Foundation
(m) (m) structure structure
T- B eam O pen
L HS RCC
1 1 1 + 4 33 1 x 11.16 11. 16 11 12 No G irders f oundation 2006
T- B eam Op en f oundation
I 1+ 895 L HS 1 x 20.40 RCC
2 20.4 11 12 No Gi r d e r 20 07
T- B ea m O pe n
L HS r cc
3 14 + 72 6 3 X 15 . 00 +s 11 12 No Gi rd e r, f oun datio n 2007
T- B eam Open
RHS RCC
4 1++ 72 6 3 X 1 5. 00 45 11 12 No G irders f oun datio n 2007
T- B eam Open
5 LHS RCC
l8+432 1 x 13. 20 13.2 11 12 No G ird er , f oun datio n 2006
T-B eam Open

LHS 1 x14 . 10 RCC
6 l ' H 010 14.1 11 12 No G irder f oundation 20 06
T-B eam O pen

L HS 1 x 11.25 11 RCC
7 19+ 10 5 11. 2 5 12 No Gi r d e r s f oundation 20 06
T - B eam O pe n
RHS RCC
8 21+487 3 x 17.60 S2 .8 11 12 No G ird ers f oundation 20 07
T - B ea m Open
LHS RCC
9 2,+38 4 3 X 12 . 00 36 11 12 No G irders f oun datio n 20 07
T-B eam Ope n

3 X 12.00 .16 RCC
10 2; + 3 84 RHS 11 12 No G irders Foundation 2007
T- Be am Open
L HS
11 27+595 1 x 11.70 11 .7 11 12 No G irders RCC f oun datio n 2006
T B eam
O p e n f o u nd atio n
L.HS 3x 13.60 RCC
12 34+ +88 40.8 11 12 No Gi rd ers 2007

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Span Carriage
Type of
ment, Length, Width, Width, Supe r Sub Construction
(m) (m)
T-B eam O p e n f ou n datio n
L HS RCC
I3 36 + 7 1 7 1 x 18 .5 0 18 .5 11 12 No G ird ers 2006
T - Beam Ope n
14 No Gir ders RCC foundation
36 + 78 4 LHS I x 11.80 I 1.8 11 12 20 06
T - Beam Ope n
15 37 +12 4 LHS 1 X 1 6.8 0 RCC foundation
16. 8 11 12 No 2006
Gir der s
T - Beam Ope n
16 37+ 326 LHS 1 X 17.40 RCC
17 .40 11 12 No 2007
Gir der s foundation
T- Beam Open
37 +73 7 43 Gir ders RCC foundation
17 LHS 2 x 21. 50 11 12 No 2006
T - Beam Ope n
LHS 1 x 20.00 20 11 12 Gir ders RCC foundation 2006
18 38 +05 7 No
T- Beam Ope n
Gir ders RCC foundation
19 38 + 89 0 LHS 1 x 23.20 23.2 11 12 No 2006
T - Beam Ope n
39 +29 2 RCC foundation
20 LHS 2 X 17. 20 35 11 I2 No 2007
Girders
T - Beam Ope n
LHS
Girders
RCC foundation
21 39+544 1 x 17.8 0 17. 8 11 12 No 2006
T - Beam O pen
12
RCC foundation
22 43+ 65 0 LHS 1 x1 1.0 0 11 11 No 2006
Girders
T - Beam O pen
46 +784 L HS 1 x 13 . 25 1 3.25 RCC 2007
23 11 12 No
Girders foundation
T- Beam Ope n
46+ 784 RHS 1 x1 3. 2 5 RCC 2007
24 1 3.25 11 12 No foundation
Gir der s

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Span Carriage
Type of
(m) (m)
T - Beam Open
1 x 13.25
25 48 + 0 1 1 LHS I 3. 25 11 12 No RCC 2006
Gir der s foun dation
T - Beam O pen
26 48 +40 4 LHS 1x13.00 13 11 12
No Gir ders RCC foundation 20 06
T - Beam Ope n
LHS RCC foundation
27 48 +6 32 1 x 13.10 13.1 11 12 No Gir ders 200 6
T - Beam Ope n
LHS RCC
28 48 + 966 2 X ]2.10 24.2 11 12 No foundation 200 7
Gir der s
T - Be am Open
LHS RCC
29 49+170 1 x 20.00 20 11 12 No foundation 200 6
Gir ders
T - Beam Open
LHS No Gir ders RCC foundation
30 4 9+ 9 2 5 1x 11.40 11.4 11 12 2006
T- Beam Open
LHS Girders RCC foundation
31 51 +480 1 x 20.50 20.5 11 12 No 2006
T Beam O pen
LHS Girder RCC
32 052+65 I 1x 17. 60 17.6 11 12 No 200 8
Foundation
T Beam Ope n
LHS RCC
33 053+ 7 12 2 x 11 .50 23 11 12 No Girder 2008
Foundation
T Beam O pen
RHS 23 RCC Foun dation
34 053+712 2 x 11. 50 11 12 No Girder 2007
T Beam O pen
RHS Gir der RCC Foun dation
35 054+590 1 x 13 .90 13.9 11 12 No 2008

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Span Carriage
Type of
(m) (m)
T Beam Ope n
RHS 15.23 Gir der RCC Foun dation
36 054+962 1 x 15 .23 11 l2 No 200 8
T Beam O pen
RHS RCC
37 055+390 1 x 11.60 11.6 11 12 No Foundation 200 8
Gir der
T Bea m Ope n
RHS RCC
38 056+000 l x 1 2.20 12.2 11 12 No 1:oundation 200 7
Gir der
T Beam Ope n
RHS RCC Foun dation
39 056 ++65 2 X 13.80 27.6 11 12 No 2008
Girder
T Beam Ope n
40 057+619 RHS 1x 17 .29 17 .29 11 12 No RC C 200 7
Gir der Foundation
T Beam Open
41 057+859 RHS I x 1 7.50 17. 50 11 12 No Gir der RC C 200 7
Foundation
T Be a m Ope n
42 058+319 RHS 2 X 13. 60 27 . 2 11 12 No RC C 200 7
Girder Fo un dation
T Beam O pen
43 058 + 581 RHS 1x 13.80 13.8 11 12 No RCC Foun dation 2008
Gir der
T Beam Ope n
44 058+724 RHS l x 13 .80 13.8 11 12 No RCC Foun dation 2008
Gir ders
T Beam Ope n
45 059+ 1 20 RHS Ix 19.00 19 11 12 No Gir der RCC 2008
foundation
T Beam Open
46 059+484 RH S 1 x 1 3 .50 13. 5 11 12 No RC C 2008
Girder Foundation

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Span Carriage
S. Arrange Total way Deck Footpath Type of Type of Ye ar of
Chainage Type of
(m) (m)
T Beam Open
47 059+510 RHS 1 x 1 3.00 13 11 12 No Gir der RCC Foun dation 2008
T Beam O pen
48 060+006 RHS 3 X 10. 70 32. 1 11 12 No Girder RC C Foun dation 2008
T Beam Open
49 06 5+ 08 6 RHS 1 x 14. 50 14 .5 11 12 No Girder RC C Foundation 200 7
T Be am Open
50 065+ I 20 RHS 1 x 15.95 15.9 5 11 12 No RC C Foundation 200 7
Girder
T Beam Ope n
51 065+189 RHS 1 x 1 2. 20 12. 2 11 12 No Gir der RCC 700 7
Foundation
T Beam Open
No Foundation
52 065 + 271 RHS Ix 11.70 11.7 11 12 RC C 2007
Gir der
T l3cam Open
RHS Gir der RCC Foundation
53 065+4 6 1 x 13.60 I 3.6 11 12 No 200 7
T Beam
O pen
RHS Gir der RCC
54 06S+490 1 x 13.60 I 3.6 11 12 No 200 7
foundation
T Beam Open
55 RHS Gir der RCC Foundation
06 5+ 6 I I 1 x 11.60 I 1. 6 11 12 No 2007
T Beam
Ope n
RHS Gir der RCC
56 066+082 2 X 11.60 23.2 11 12 No 2007
foundation
T Beam
Ope n
LHS Girder RCC
57 068+ 304 3 x13.60 40.8 11 12 No Foundation 2007

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Span Carriage
Type of
(m) (m)
T Beam Open
58 RHS RCC
068+ 304 3 x 13.60 40 .8 11 12 No Girder Foundation 200 8
T Beam Open
LHS Girder RCC Foundation
59 069+417 1 x 11.70 11.7 11 12 No 2007
T Beam Open
RHS Gir der RCC Foundation
60 069+417 1 x 11.70 11.7 11 12 No 2008
T B
, e1m Open
070+0l 2 LHS RCC Foundation
61 2 x 17 .60 3 5.2 11 1 1.6 No Gir der 2007
T Beam Open
LHS No Gir der Foundation
62 076+578 2 x 15 .60 31. 2 11 12 RCC 2008
T Beam Ope n
RHS RCC
63 076+S78 2 x 15.60 31.2 11 12 No Gir der Foun dation 2008
T Beam Ope n
LHS 3 1. 3 RCC
64 077 + 862 2 x 15.65 11 12 No Girder foun dation 2008
T Beam Open
65 RHS 31.3 RCC
077+862 2 x15.65 11 12 No Foundation 2008
Girder
T Beam Open
LHS RCC
66 078+224 I x 20 .00 20 11 12 No 2008
Gir der Foundation
T Beam Ope n
RHS RCC Foun dation
67 078+224 I x 20.00 20 11 12 No 2008
Gir der
T Beam Ope n
LHS RCC
68 080+430 I x 12. 50 12.5 11 12 No 200 8
Gir ders Fo un dation
T Beam O pen
69 LHS RCC Foundation
083+334 Ix 11.00 11 11 11.6 No Gir der 200 7

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Span Carriage
S. Arrange Total way Deck Footpath Type of Type of Ye ar of
Chainage Type of
ment, Length, Width, Width, Supe r Sub Constructi
(m) (m) structure structure on
(m) (m)
T Beam O pen
085+511 LHS RCC Foundation
70 Ix 10 .80 10.8 11 12 No 2007
Girder
T Beam Open
RHS Girder RCC Foun dation
71 089+ 380 3x 13.60 40.8 7. 5 12 No 2008
2 X 17 .6 0
T Beam O pen
096+596 LHS RCC
72 +1x 8 .80 44 11 12 No Gir der Foundation 2008
T Beam Open
73 LHS RCC Foundation
100+768 I x 11.84 11.84 11 12 No 200 7
Girder
T Bea m Open
LHS
74 10 1 + 290 Ix 11 .00 11 11 12 No RCC 2007
Girder foundation
T Beam Open
75 RHS 11 RCC
10 1+ 290 I x 11 .00 11 12 No Gir der Foundation 2007

4.0 VISUAL INSPECTION OF DISTRESSED STRUCTURES AND REHABILITATION

MEASURES
All the 87 listed structures as shown in Table-1 and Table-2 have been inspected
through Mobile Bridge Inspection Unit (MBIU) and ladders for all the accessible
components. Randomly NDT, Carbonation Test and extraction of Core Samples from
structures also carried out. Based on the visual inspection of the structures, test results of
random NDT& other tests the required remedial measures suggested for the defects on
individual structures. For the one rehabilitated major bridge at Ch 114+759(LHS) and 36
distressed structures a comprehensive Report is prepared as described below.

The present report Volume-2: Detailed Report on Condition and remedial measures of
Structures Part-II-Major and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed conditions deal with the
observations and remedial measures to be taken up for the 36 numbers of identified
minor/major distressed bridges as per Table-3 in the main report Volume-1. The NDT
Results, Carbonation Test and Core Test results are given in Para -5 in the report Volume- 1.
Methodology for repair/rehabilitation has been described in Para-6 in the report Volume- 1.
Some of the typical views of conditions observed on the various components of the structures,
observations and repair/rehabilitation measures suggested are described below for the each
and every distressed structure:
4.1 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage
18+432(LHS)
Photos 1 to 16 show typical view of the minor bridge and conditions of its various
components. The Results of NDT are given in Annexure-1 to Annexure-3, in the Vol. 1. The
observations and suggested remedial measures are described below:

Photo 1: A vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-18+432(LHS)
Photo 2: A vie w of inspection and testing of Minor Bridge at Ch-18+432(LHS)

(Abutment A1) Abutment (A2)
Photo 3: Debris accumulated on the expansion joints of both abutments Minor Bridge at Ch-
18+432(LHS)
Photo 4: A vie w of debris accumulated on the Abutme nt head at A1(LHS).

Photo 5: A vie w of plantation growth and debris accumulated on the Abutment head at A-2of
the minor bridge at Ch. 18+432.
Photo 6: Cracks observed on the Girder of minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS)

Photo 7: Cracks observed on the diaphragm wall between Girders G3-G4 of minor bridge at
chainage 18+432(LHS).
Photo 8: Cracks observed on the Girder G-2 of the minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS)

Photo 9: Crack observed on Deck slab bottom between girders G1-G2 in Span A1-A2 of minor
bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS).
Photo 10: Severe Cracks observed on Deck slab Bottom between girder G1-G2 in the Span A1-
A2 of minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS).

Photo 11: Severe crack observed on Deck slab Bottom between girder G2-G-3in Span A1-A2 of
minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS).
Photo 12 : A vie w of POT & PTFE Bearing of minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS).

Photo 13: A view of drainage spout of minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS).
Photo 14: A vie w of corroded railings of Crash Barrier of minor bridge at chainage
18+432(LHS).

Photo 15: A vie w of corroded railings of Crash Barrier of minor bridge at chainage
18+432(LHS).
Photo 16: General View of Mastic Asphalt of minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS).
4.1.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage 18+432(LHS)

Almost all the components of the structures have been inspected through ladders. Conditions of
the various components of the structures are shown in Photos 1 to 16 in Para-4.1 above. The
following are the general observations on the minor bridge:
(a) Localized damages seen on the deck slab around drainage spout. One of the drainage
spouts found missing. Some of the drainage spouts leaking and become ineffective.

(b) Severe cracks observed on deck slab between Girder G1-G2, G2-G3 and G3-G4.
(c) Shear and Flexure cracks seen at the support and mid span on the Girders.
(d) Cracks seen on the cross girders between G2-G3 and G3-G4 at mid span.
(e) Both the abutment heads are having debris.
(f) Expansion joins full of dust. Rubber seals damaged at abutment A1.
(g) Vegetation growth observed all around the structure.
(h) Cleaning of bearing and it’s painting required.
(i) Left out Shuttering and Poor finish at a few locations observed on abutment, crash
barrier etc.
(j) Hand rails on crash barrier corroded.
4.1.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Minor Bridge at Chainage 18+432(LHS)
The Non destructive Tests have been carried out as detailed in Para- 5 and results tabulated in
Annexure-1 to Annexure 3 in the Volume – 1 of the report. The Para-6 described the detailed
methodology for the strengthening measures in the Volume–1 of the report. NDT results show
that the quality of concrete is doubtful. The cover provided meets the requirement in abutments,
girders and deck slab. The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects
observed on the structures are detailed below:
4.1.2.1 Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of structures
Both the abutment heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages have been
observed on the abutment walls. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
(i) By the polymer mortar /concrete as detailed in the para 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume-
1and
(ii) Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1; if any.
4.1.2.2 Repair/Strengthening of Girders of structure
In general conditions of girders are good. However, minor Shear and Flexure Cracks
have been observed at some locations on the longitudinal girders. The damaged and
cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:

(a) The top surface of girders to be cleaned properly and repaired at the required locations
up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond
40mm depth as detailed in Para 6.3 in Volume-1.
(b) Crack on the girders to be repaired by pressure grouting as detailed in the Para 6.2 in
Volume-1.
4.1.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Diaphragm Walls/Cross Beams of structures
In general diaphragm walls/cross girders are in good conditions; at some loca tions
Cracks and damaged surfaces have been observed on the cross girders. The damaged and
cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
(a) The top surface of diaphragm walls to be cleaned properly and repaired at the required
locations up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as detailed in the Para 6.1 and
beyond 40mm depth as detailed in Para 6.3 in Vol. 1.
(b) Cracks on the cross diaphragm of girders, the same to be repaired by pressure grouting
as detailed in the Para 6.2.
(c) The vertical cracks on diaphragm walls to be strengthened by FRP laminates as detailed
in para 6.8 in some of the structures.
4.1.2.4 Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck Slab of structures
In general during visual inspection there are some local damages, localized leaching
and cracks seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:
(i) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the polymer concrete as
detailed in Para 6.3.
(ii) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
4.1.2.5 Strengthening of severe cracked Deck Slab of structures
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between
Girder G1-G2 and G2-G3. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2 and G2-G3to be
replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the corroded
reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60 grade has to be
used for the severe cracked deck slab portion.

4.1.2.6 Expansion Joints on Structure
It is observed that the expansion joint gaps are filled with debris/ B C materials. The
expansion joint seals damaged at Abutment A-1. The following are proposed:
(a) Replacement of damaged rubber seals by new one at Abutment A-1.
(b) Regular cleaning of the expansion joints.
4.1.2.7 Drainage Spouts
At some of the locations the drainage spouts are leaking/not functioning properly. All
the mal functioning drainage spouts are required to be refixed/replaced with new one along
with about 50 cm projection at the bottom as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1. One of
the drainage spout completely corroded; the same to be replaced by new one
4.1.2.8 Crash Barrier
In general condition of the crash barriers are good. At some of the locations proper
repairing work to be carried out; with polymer mortar/concrete as explained in para 6.1 and
6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Hand rails required proper
painting.
4.1.2.9 Bearings
All the POT PTFE bearings have to be cleaned and painted properly.
4.2 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage
19+010(LHS)

Photo 17: A Vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).
Abutment A1 Abutment A2
Photo 18: Expansion Joints blocked & rubbe r seal broken at abutment A-2 on Minor Bridge at
Ch-19+010 (LHS).

Photo 19: A vie w of Poor finis h and leakage through Expansion joint at A2 on the Minor
Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).
Photo 20: General Vie w of Abutme nt A-1 of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).

Photo 21: A vie w of UPV test of Girder of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).
Photo 22: A vie w of repair Girder G-4 of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).

Photo 23: A view of leaching through repaired deck slab between girders G-3 and G-4 of the
Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).
Photo 24: A vie w of repaired deck slab of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).

Photo 25: A view of leaching through repaired deck slab of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010
(LHS).
Photo 26: A vie w of repaired deck slab of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).

Photo 27: A View of POT & PTFE Bearing of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).
Photo 28: A View of POT & PTFE Bearing of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).

Photo 29: A View of damaged drainage spout of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).
Photo 30: A vie w of rusted & missed out Railing and Crash Barrier of the Minor Bridge at Ch-
19+010 (LHS).

Photo 31: A vie w of B C surface of the Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).
Almost all the components of the structures have been inspected through ladders. Conditions of the
various components of the structures are shown in Photos 17 to 31 in Para-4.2 above. The following
are the general observations on the minor bridge:
(a) Localized damages seen on the deck slab around drainage spout. Three of the
drainage spouts found missing. Some of the drainage spouts leaking and become
ineffective.
(b) Severe leaching observed on deck slab between Girder G3-G4. However, localized
leaching seen on the some of the other locations on the deck slab.
(c) Both the abutment heads are having debris.
(d) Expansion joins full of dust. Rubber seals damaged at abutment A-2.
(e) Cleaning of bearing and it’s painting required.
(f) Poor finish observed at a few locations observed on abutment, crash barrier etc.
(g) Hand rails on crash barrier corroded.
The Non destructive Tests have also been carried out as detailed in Para- 5 in the Volume – 1 of the
report. The Para-6 described the detailed methodology for the strengthening measures. NDT results

show that the quality of concrete is doubtful. The cover provided meets the requirement in
abutments, girders and deck slab. The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the
defects observed on the structures are detailed below:
(i) By the polymer mortar /concrete as detailed in the para 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume-1and
(ii)Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1; if any.
In general during visual inspection there are some local damages, localized leaching and
cracks seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:
a) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the polymer concrete as detailed
in Para 6.3.
b) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
expansion joint seals damaged at Abutment A-2. The following are proposed:
(a)Replacement of damaged rubber seals by new one at Abutment A-2.
(b) Regular cleaning of the expansion joints.
Three of the drainage spout completely corroded; the same to be replaced by new one. At
some of the locations damaged concrete seen around the drainage spouts and are
leaking/not functioning properly. All the mal functioning drainage spouts are required to be
refixed/replaced with new one along with about 50 cm projection at the bottom as detailed
in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.

6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. The missing hand rails to be
replaced by new one. Hand rails also required proper painting.
4.2.2.6 Bearings
4.3 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)
Photo 32: A view of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)

(Abutment A1) Abutment (A2)
Photo 33: A view of Expansion joint of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)
Photo 34:A Vie w of inspection of Abutme nt-A1 of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)

Photo 35:A Vie w of inspection of Abutme nt-A2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)
Photo 36: A Vie w of inspection of cracks on girde rs of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)

Photo 37: A Vie w of sever cracks on deck slab between girders G1-G2 of Minor Bridge at
Chainage 19+105(LHS)
Photo 38: A Vie w of sever cracks on deck slab between girders G2-G3 of Minor Bridge at

Photo 39: A Vie w of Pot PTFE bearing of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)
Photo 40: A Vie w of drainage spot of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)

Photo 41: A Vie w of drainage spot of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)
Photo 42: A Vie w of Crash Barriers of Minor Bridge at Chainage 19+105(LHS)
Almost all the components of the structures have been inspected through ladders. Conditions of the
various components of the structures are shown in Photos 32 to 42 in Para-4.3 above. The following
(a) Cantilever portion of Deck slab repaired in the past.
(b) Severe cracks have been seen on deck slab between girders G1-G2, G2- G3 and G3-

G4.
(c) Cracks seen on Girder G1, G2 and G4.
(d) Cracks seen in the cross girder between G2-G3 at the mid span.
(e) Both the abutment heads are having debris.
(f) Expansion joints are found full of dust.
(g) Cleaning of bearing and its painting required.
(h) Some patch work requires on abutment, crash barrier etc.
(i) Hand rails on crash barrier corroded.

The Non destructive Tests have also been carried out as detailed in Para- 5 in the Volume – 1
of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful. The Para-6 in the
Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed methodology for the strengthening measures.
The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects observed on the
element of structure are detailed below:
Both the abutment heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages have
been observed on the abutment walls. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
(a) By the polymer mortar /concrete as detailed in the para 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume-1and
(b) Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1; if any.
4.3.2.2 Repair/Strengthening of Girders of structure
In general conditions of girders are good. However, minor Shear and Flexure Cracks have
been observed at some locations on the longitudinal girders. The damaged and cracked
surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
(a) The top surface of girders to be cleaned properly and repaired at the required
beyond 40mm depth as detailed in Para 6.3 in Volume-1.
Volume-1.
4.3.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Diaphragm Walls/Cross Beams of structures

In general diaphragm walls/cross girders are in good conditions; at some locations Cracks and
damaged surfaces have been observed on the cross girders. The damaged and cracked
(a) The top surface of diaphragm walls to be cleaned properly and repaired at the
required locations up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as detailed in the Para
6.1 and beyond 40mm depth as detailed in Para 6.3 in Vol. 1.
(b) Cracks on the cross diaphragm of girders, the same to be repaired by pressure
grouting as detailed in the Para 6.2.
(c) The vertical cracks on diaphragm walls at the mid span between girders G2-G3 to
be strengthened by FRP laminates as detailed in para 6.8 in some of the structures.
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between Girder G1-
G2, G2-G3 and G3-G4. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2, G2-G3and G3-G4to be
4.3.2.5 Bearings
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly.
All the drainage spouts had been replaced by new one. However, one of them is leaking/not
functioning properly. The mal functioning drainage spouts is required to be refixed
properly using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Hand rails of the crash barriers
required replacement by new one.

4.4 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487 (RHS)
Photo43: A view of of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS)
Abutment A1 Pier P1 Pier P2 Abutment A2
Photo 44: A view of Expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS)

Photo 45: A vie w of Expansion Joint at P-2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS)
Photo 46: A vie w of abutment A-1of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS)

Photo 47: A vie w of Pier P-2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS)
Photo 48: Hair line Vertical Crack observed at Abutment A2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage
21+487(RHS).

Photo 49: Leaching observed on deck slab between girders G1-G2 in the spanP2-A2 of Minor
Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS).
Photo 50: A vie w of Repaired surface on deck slab in the span P1-P2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage
21+487(RHS).

Photo 51: A vie w of leaching on deck slab between girders G2-G3 in the span P1-P2 of Minor
Photo 52: A vie w of leaching on deck slab in the span P1-P2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage
21+487(RHS).

Photo 53: A vie w of leaching on deck slab between girders G1-G2 in the span P1-P2 of Minor
Photo 54: A view of leaching on deck slab between girde rs G1-G2 and G2-G3 in the span P1-P2
of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS).

Photo 55: A vie w of Elastome ric bearing of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS).
Photo 56: A vie w of Elastome ric bearing of Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS).

Photo 57: A vie w of drainage spouts of the major Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS).
Photo 58: A view of rusted Railing and Crash Barrier of the major Bridge at Chainage
21+487(RHS).

Photo 59: - General View of BC of the major Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS).
4.4.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS)
Almost all the components of the structures have been inspected through ladders. Conditions
of the various components of the structures are shown in Photos 43 to 59 in Para-4.4 above.
The following are the general observations on the minor bridge:
1. Some of the drainage spouts require replacement.
2. Some portion of Deck slab repaired in the past.
3. Severe leaching have been seen on deck slab between girders G1-G2 in the span P2-
A2; G1-G2 & G2 - G3 in span P1-P2 and G2-G3 in span A1-P1 .
4. Minor shear and flexure cracks have been seen on Girders. Honeycombing seen on
girder surface.
5. Piers and abutment heads are having debris. Hair line Vertical Crack observed on Pier
Cap P1 (RHS Carriageway )
6. Expansion joints are found full of dust.

7. Concave Bearings profile seen at the top. However, no bulging seen on the bearings.
8. Hand rails on crash barrier corroded.
9. Hair line Vertical Crack observed at Abutment A2.
10. Main reinforcement exposed in the Longitudinal and Transverse seismic restrainer
at abutment A-1.

11. Cracks observed and damaged Edge seen on the bearing pedestal below girder G-1
at Pier P1 in the Span A1-P1.
12. Bearing Pedestal Edge damaged below Girder G-3 at A1.
4.4.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Minor Bridge at Chainage 21+487(RHS)

of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful. The Para-6 in the
Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed methodology for the strengthening measures.
The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects observed on the
element of structure are detailed below:
4.4.2.2 Strengthening Measures for Pie r of structures
Pier heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages have been observed on
piers. The vertical crack observed on Pier P-1. The surfaces and cracks to be repaired as
follows:
(b) Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1.
4.4.2.3 Strengthening Measures for Bearing Pedestal/Seismic restrainers of structures
At some locations local damages have been observed on bearing pedestal. The crack also
observed below girder G-1 at Pier P-1. Exposed reinforcement have been seen on the
Seismic restrainers. The surfaces and cracks to be repaired as follows:
4.4.2.4Repair/Strengthening of Girders of structure

(a) The top surface of girders to be cleaned properly and repaired at the required locations
up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond
40mm depth as detailed in Para 6.3 in Volume-1.
Volume-1.
(a) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the polymer concrete as detailed in
Para 6.3.
(b) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between girders
G1-G2 in the span P2-A2; G1-G2 & G2 - G3 in span P1-P2 and G2-G3 in span A1-P1. The
following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2, G2-G3and G3-G4 to be
The mal functioning drainage spouts is required to be re-fixed properly using polymer
mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.

4.5 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS)
Photo 60: A Vie w of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS)
Photo 61: A Vie w of Pier P-2 of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS)

Photo 62: A Vie w of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS)
Photo 63: A Vie w of Abutment-A2 of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS).

Photo 64: Severe Crack observed on the Deck slab between Girders G1-G2 in the span P2-A2 of
minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS) .
Photo 65: Severe Crack observed on the Deck slab between Girders G2-G3 in the span P2-A2
of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS) .

Photo 66: Localized Cracks observed on the Deck slab between Girders G1-G2 in the span P1-
P2 of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS).
Photo 67: Localized Cracks observed on the Deck slab between Girders G2-G3 in the span P1-
P2 of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS).

Photo 68: Typical view of POT & PTFE bearing below girder G4 at abutme nt A2 of minor
bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS).
Photo 69: Typical view of POT & PTFE bearing below girder G3 at abutme nt A2 of minor
bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS).

Photo 70: Typical vie w of drainage spout of minor bridge at Chainage 25+384(RHS).
Almost all the components of the structures have been inspected through ladders. Conditions
of the various components of the structures are shown in Photos 60 to 70 in Para 4.5 above.
The following are the general observations on the minor bridge:
1. Two drainage spouts found missing. Others corroded and require replacement.
2. Severe cracks have been seen on deck slab between girders G1-G2, G2-G3 in the
span P2-A2.
3. Localized leaching and cracks seen in the deck slab between girder G1-G2 & G2 -
G3 in span P1-P2 and G3-G4 in span P2-A2 .
4. Minor shear and flexure cracks seen on Girders.
5. Bearing Lock and Wooden block not removed at P2.
6. Piers and abutment heads are having debris.
7. Expansion joins full of dust. Rubber seal damaged at P2.
8. Bearings required cleaning and painting.


of the report. Core result show poor strength of concrete and NDT results show that the quality
of concrete is doubtful. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed
methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthening measures to
be adopted for the defects observed on the element of structure are detailed below:
(a)By the polymer mortar /concrete as detailed in the para 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume-1 and
(b)Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1; if any.
4.5.2.2 Strengthening Measures for Pie r of structures
piers. The surfaces and cracks to be repaired as follows:
4.5.2.3 Strengthening Measures for Bearing Pedestal/Seismic restrainers of structures
At some locations local damages have been observed on bearing pedestal. The crack also
observed below girder G-1 at Pier P-1. Exposed reinforcement have been seen on the
Seismic restrainers. The surfaces and cracks to be repaired as follows:
4.5.2.4Repair/Strengthening of Girders of structure
Volume-1.

in Para 6.3.
G1-G2 & G2 - G3 in span P2-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2 & G2-G3 in span P2-
A2 to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the
corroded reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60 grade
has to be used for the severe cracked deck slab portion.
4.5.2.7 Bearings
First the wooden blocks to be removed and bearing locks to be cut at Pier P2. All the POT
PTFE bearings have to be cleaned and painted properly.
Two drainage spouts found missing and several corroded and require replacement. The
drainage spouts are required to be refixed properly using polymer mortar/concrete as
detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.

4.6 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Major Bridge at Chainage 30+345(LHS)
Photos 71 to 110 show typical view of the major bridge and conditions of its various
components. The Results of NDT are given in Annexure-1 to Annexure-3, in the Vol. 1.
The observations and suggested remedial measures are described below:
Photo 71: A view of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 72: A View of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 73: A Vie w of inspection of Box girder through Mobile Bridge Inspection of Major Bridge
at Ch-30+345
Photo 73: Side Vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345

Photo 74: Side Vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345
Photo 75: A vie w of wrongly constructed continuous edge beam over expansion joint on Major
Bridge at Ch-30+345

(Abutment A1) (Pier P3) Abutment (A2)
Photo 76: A view of strip seal expansion joint on Major Bridge at Ch-30+345
Photo 77: A Vie w of Rebound Hamme r Test on Abutment-A1 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 78: A vie w of Pier P-3 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 79: Exposed Reinforcement on Pier P-4 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 80: A vie w of repaired crack seal work on the soffit slab in span A1 -P1 of Major Bridge
at Ch-30+345.
Photo 81: A vie w of cracks on the deck slab in span A1-P1 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 82: A vie w of leaching on the deck slab in span A1-P1 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 83: A vie w of cracks on the web in span P1-P2 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 84: A vie w of cracks seen on the deck slab in s pan P1-P2 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 85: Inside view of Box Girder in the span P2-P3 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 86: Cracks on deck and we b of Box Girde r in the span P2 -P3 of Major Bridge at Ch-
30+345.
Photo 87: Cracks on soffit of Box Girder in the span P3-P4 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 88: Cracks on soffit slab of Box Girde r in the span P3-P4 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 89: Cracks on soffit slab of Box Girde r in the span P3-P4 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 90: Cracks on we b of Box Girder in the span P4 -P5 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 91: Cracks on the soffit of Box Girder in the span P4-P5 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 92: Cracks repaired on the soffit of Box Girder in the span P5 -A2 of Major Bridge at Ch-
30+345.
Photo 93: Cracks repaired on the soffit of Box Girder near abutme nt A1 in the span P5-A2 of
Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 94: Cracks repaired on the soffit of Box Girder in the span P5 -A2 of Major Bridge at Ch-
30+345.
Photo 95: Cracks repaired on the soffit of Box Girder near A2 in the span P5-A2 of Major
Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 96: A vie w of Bearing at abutment A-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 97: A vie w of Bearing at abutment A-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 98: A vie w of Bearing at Pier P-3 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 101: A vie w of crushed leveling layer Bearing Pedestal at Pier P-5 of Major Bridge at Ch-
30+345.

Photo 102: A vie w of Bearing pedestal at Pier P-5 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 103: A vie w of Debris accumulates on abutment A2 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.

Photo 104: A vie w of Debris accumulates on abutment A2 of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345.
Photo 105: Drain pipe found missing in the Drainage Spout of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345


Photo 108: A view of rusted Railings & damaged edge beam and fade painting on Crash
Barrie rs of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345
Photo 109: A view of footpath of the Major Bridge at Ch-30+345 .

Photo110: General View of Mastic Asphalt on the Major Bridge at Ch-30+345
4.6.1 General Observations on Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-30+345(LHS)
Almost all the components of the structures have been inspected through Mobile Bridge
Inspection Unit. Conditions of the various components of the structures are shown in Photos
71 to 110 in Para 4.6 above. The following are the general observations on the major bridge:
1. Some drainage spouts pipes are found missing & some corroded.
2. Severe cracks have been seen on deck slabs, webs and soffit slabs in the box girders.
3. Localized leaching and cracks seen in the soffit slab in span A1-P1, P3-P4, P4-P5
and P5-A2. Past Repair work also observed on the soffit slab.
4. Aprons around piers found Brocken.
5. Bearing Lock and Wooden block not removed at pier P2.
6. Piers and abutment heads are having debris and also require some patch works.
7. Reinforcement continued at the expansion joint location on the ed ge beam of
railings as shown in photo 75.
8. Expansion joins found full of dust. At some of the locations edge beam concrete
cracked.
9. Debris seen around Bearings and painting found in effective.
10. Additional leveling layer of both the Bearing Pedestals (B1 & B2) cracked at Pier
P5.

11. Hand rails on crash barrier and around pier heads corroded.
12. Reinforcement Exposed on Pier P4.
4.6.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Major Bridge at Ch-30+345(LHS)

The Non destructive Tests have also been carried out as detailed in Para- 5 in the Volume –
1 of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful in superstructure
and doubtful to good in piers and abutments. The cover provided almost meets the
requirement in sub structure and super structure. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report
described the detailed methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial
repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects observed on the various element
of major bridge are detailed below:
4.6.2.1 Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345(LHS)
4.6.2.2 Strengthening Measures for Pie r of Major Bridge at Ch-30+345(LHS)
piers. The apron around piers has to be reconstructed. The surfaces and cracks to be
repaired as follows:
(a) By the polymer mortar /concrete as detailed in the para 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume-1 and
4.6.2.3 Strengthening Measures for Bearing Pedestal/Seismic restrainers of structure
At some locations local damages have been observed on bearing pedestal. At pier P5
bearing pedestal leveling layer crushed; the same to be reconstructed. The surfaces and
cracks to be repaired as follows:
(a) Local damages to be repaired with the polymer mortar /concrete as detailed in the para
6.1 & 6.3 in Volume-1and
(c) At Pier P-5 bearing pedestals require proper strengthening by reconstruction.
4.6.2.4 Repair/Strengthening of box Girders of structure

Shear and Flexure Cracks have been observed at several locations on the box girders. The
damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
Volume-1.
(c) FRP wrapping and laminates to be provided as detailed in para 6.7 in Volume-1 in all
the spans. Or
Alternatively FRP raps and external prestressing both can be provided as detailed in
para 6.7 and 6.9 in Volume-1.
4.6.2.5 Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck /soffit Slabs of structures

cracks seen on the soffit/deck slab. Localized leaching and cracks have been seen in the
soffit slab in span A1-P1, P3-P4, P4-P5 and P5-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
(a) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as detailed in
the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the polymer concrete as detailed in Para 6.3.
(b) The localized leaching area and Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in
para 6.2.
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab. The following
measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked deck slab to be replaced by the new one by removing the
affected area and proper treating the corroded reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6. The self
compacting concrete of M-60 grade has to be used for the severe cracked deck slab portion
and to be poured from the top.
4.6.2.7 Bearings
The wooden blocks have to be removed and bearing locks to be cut at Pier P2. All POT-
PTFE bearings have to be cleaned and painted properly.

expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Edge beam cracked concrete to be repaired
properly using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
Some drainage spouts are missing and many found corroded and require replacement. The
new drainage spouts are required to be refixed properly using polymer mortar/concrete as
In general condition of the crash barriers are good. At some of the locations proper repairing
work to be carried out; with polymer mortar/concrete as explained in para 6.1 and 6.3.
Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure.
4.6.2.11 Hand Rails
Hand rails of the crash barriers and inspection platform around pier heads required
painting/replacement by new one.
4.7 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)
Photo 111: General Vie w of Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)

Photo 112: A vie w of Expansion joint of Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)
Photo 113: A vie w of NDT on Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)

Photo 114: General Vie w of Abutme nt-A1 of Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)
Photo 115: General Vie w of Abutme nt-A2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)

Photo 116: - Crusting Crack observed on Deck slab.
Photo 116: A View of severe cracks between girders G2-G3 on the deck slab of Minor Bridge at
Photo 117: A Vie w of transverse crack between girders G2-G3 on the deck slab of Minor
Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)

Photo 118: Leaching observed on deck slab of Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)
Photo 119: A vie w of girders of the Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)

Photo 120: A vie w of POT-PTFE Bearing below girde r G-3 at abutment A-1 of Minor Bridge at
Photo 121: A vie w of drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)
Photo 122: A vie w of the drainage spouts of Minor Bridge at Chainage 36+784(LHS)

4.7.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage Ch-36+784(LHS)
Almost all the components of the structures have been inspected. Conditions of the various
components of the structures are shown in Photos 111 to 122 in Para 4.7 above. The following
1. All the three drainage spouts corroded and requires replacement.

2. Severe cracks have been seen in deck slab between G2-G3 on the deck slabs.
Transverse crack also seen between girders G3-G4.
3. Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on the girders.
5. Reinforcement of one of the girder exposed near the bearings and also one end of
girder cracked at A2.
6. Expansion joins found full of dust. Rubber seal damaged at A1and A2.
7. Bearings required cleaning and painting.
4.7.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Minor Bridge at Chainage Ch-36+784(LHS)
of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful in superstructure and
abutments. The cover provided ingeneral meets the requirement in sub structure and super
structure. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed methodology for
the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the
defects observed on the element of structure are detailed below:
4.7.2.2 Repair/Strengthening of Girders of minor bridge at Ch-36+784(LHS)
Volume-1.

(c) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
in Para 6.3.
(d) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between girders G2
- G3 and G3-G4 in span A1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2 & G3-G4 in span A1-
A2 to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the
4.7.2.5 Bearings
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Both the rubber seals have to be replaced by
new one.
All the three drainage spouts found corroded and require replacement. The drainage spouts
are required to be re-fixed properly using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1
and 6.3 in Vol. 1.

4.8 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)
Photo 123: A vie w of for Minor Bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)
Photo 124: A vie w of both the expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)

Photo 125: A vie w of Vegetation Growth observed on Abutme nt A-1 of Minor Bridge at
Photo 126: A vie w of Abutment A-2 of Minor Bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)

Photo 127: A vie w of Shear cracks observed on girde rs of Minor Bridge at Chainage
37+326(LHS)
Photo 128: A view of Flexural cracks observed on girder G-1 of Minor Bridge at Chainage
37+326(LHS)

37+326(LHS)
37+326(LHS)

Photo 130: A vie w of leaching observed on deck slab at Chainage 37+326(LHS)
Photo 130: A vie w of sever crack on deck slab at Chainage 37+326(LHS)

Photo 131: A vie w of leaching observed on deck slab at Chainage 37+326(LHS)
Photo 132: A vie w of sever cracks on deck slab at Chainage 37+326(LHS)

Photo 133: A vie w leaching and cracks on deck slab at Chainage 37+326(LHS)
Photo 134: A vie w elastomeric bearing of minor bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)

Photo 135:A vie w of wooden planks at elastomeric bearing on minor bridge at Chainage
37+326(LHS)
Photo 136: A vie w elastomeric bearing of minor bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)

Photo 137: A view of left out wooden block near elastome ric bearing on minor bridge at
Photo 138: A vie w of damaged and rusted drainage spout of minor bridge at Chainage
37+326(LHS)

Photo 139: A vie w rusted drainage spout of minor bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)
Photo 140: A view of rusted railing and fade painting on crash barrier of minor bridge at

Photo 141: A vie w of bituminous coat of minor bridge at Chainage 37+326(LHS)
1. One drainage spout missing and other three drainage spouts corroded and require
replacement.
2. Severe cracks have been seen in the deck slab between G1-G2, G2-G3and G3-G4
on the deck slabs.
4. Bulging seen on bearings.
6. Expansion joins found full of dust. Rubber seals damaged at A1 and A2.
7. Scouring seen at A1.
8. Crash barriers require painting.
9. Hand rails on crash barrier corroded and damaged.
10. Vegetation growth seen on the structure.
of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful in abutments and
doubtful to good in superstructure. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub
structure and super structure. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed

Both the abutment heads to be cleaned properly and vegetation growth to be removed. At
some locations local damages have been observed on the abutment walls. The surfaces to
be repaired as follows:
(c) Gravel pitching to be provided near abutment A1.
Shear and Flexure Cracks have been observed at some locations on the longitudinal girders.
The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
(a) The local damaged surfaces of girders to be cleaned properly and repaired at the
required locations up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as detailed in the Para 6.1
and beyond 40mm depth as detailed in Para 6.3 in Volume-1.
Volume-1.
(e) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
in Para 6.3.
(f) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between girdersG1-
G2, G2 - G3 and G3-G4 in span A1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2, G2-G3 & G3-G4 in
span A1-A2 to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating
the corroded reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60
grade has to be used for the severe cracked deck slab portion.
4.8.2.5 Bearings
Near around all the Elastomeric bearings have to be cleaned properly.

expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Both the rubber seals have to be replaced by
new one.
It is observed that one drainage spout missing and other three drainage spouts found
corroded and require replacement. The drainage spouts are required to be re-placed
properly by new one using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol.
1.
6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Corroded hand rails of the crash
barriers required replacement by new one.
Photo 142: A vie w of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)

Photo 143: A vie w of expansion joint of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)
Photo 144:A vie w of s hear cracks on girder (G4) of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)

Photo 145:A vie w of Honey combing on girder of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)
Photo 146: A vie w of s hear cracks on girder G-1 of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)

Photo 147: A vie w of shear and flexure cracks on girde r of minor bridge at Chainage
38+057(LHS)
Photo 148: A vie w of s hear cracks on girder G-4 of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)

Photo 149: A vie w of elastic bearing of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)

Photo 152: A vie w of drainage spouts of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)
Photo 153: A vie w of corroded drainage spouts of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)

Photo 154: A vie w of Crash Barrier and Railing of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)
Photo 155: A vie w of Crash Barrier and Railing of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)

Photo 156: A vie w of bituminous concrete of minor bridge at Chainage 38+057(LHS)
1. One drainage spout missing and other three drainage spouts corroded and require
replacement.
2. Severe cracks have been seen in the deck slab between G3-G4. Localized leaching
between G2-G3 on the deck slabs.
3. Severe Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on the girders G1 and G4.
4. Wooden block seen at bearing G4 on A2.
6. Expansion joins found full of dust.
7. Crash barrier requires painting.
superstructure. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure and super

Shear and Flexure Cracks have been observed at some locations on the longitudinal girders
G1 &G4. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
Volume-1.
4.9.2.3 Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck Slab of structure
In general during visual inspection there are some local damages, localized leaching between
G2-G3 girders and cracks seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:
(g) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
in Para 6.3.
(h) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
G3-G4 in span A1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G3-G4 in span A1-A2 to be
4.9.2.5 Bearings
Near around all the Elastomeric bearings cleaning to be done properly. Wooden blocks to
be removed below the girder G-4 at abutment A-2.

It is observed that one drainage spout missing and other three found corroded and require
replacement. The drainage spouts are required to be re-placed properly by new one using
polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Corroded hand rails of the crash
Photo 157: A Vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 158: Side View of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).
Photo 159: A Vie w of expansion joint of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 160: A Vie w NDT on abutme nt A-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).
Photo 161: A View of localized cracks on deck slab between girders G1-G2 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 162: A View of leaching on deck slab between girders G2-G3 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
38+890(LHS).
Photo 163: A View of severe cracks on deck slab between girders G3-G4 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-38+890(LHS).

Ch-38+890(LHS).
Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 166(a): A View of severe cracks on deck slab between girders G2 -G3 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-38+890(LHS).
Photo 166(b): A Vie w of sever cracks on deck slab between girde rs G2-G3 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 167:A Vie w of cracks on bottom bulb of girder of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).
Photo 168: A Vie w of wooden block left out on bearing pedestal below G4 at A2 of Minor
Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 169(a): A View of elastomeric bearing of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).
Photo 169(b): A View of elastomeric bearing of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 170: A Vie w of elastome ric bearing of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).
Photo 171: A Vie w of Drainage spouts of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).
Photo 172: A Vie w of Crash Barrier of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).

Photo 173: A Vie w of bituminous concrete of Minor Bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS).
components of the structures are shown in Photos 157 to 173 in Para 4.10 above. The
1. All the drainage spouts corroded and requires replacement.

2. Severe cracks have been seen in the deck slab between G2-G3 and G3-G4.
Localized cracks between G1-G2 on the deck slabs.
3. Severe Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on the girders G1 and G4. And
minor cracks on the girder G2 and G3.
4. Honeycombing seen on girders.
5. Wooden block seen at bearing G4 on A2.
6. Minor bulging seen in elastomeric bearings.
8. Expansion joins found full of dust. Rubber seals damaged at A1 and A2.
superstructure. The core test result of deck slab also show poor concrete strength. The cover
provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure and super structure. The Para-6 in
the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed methodology for the strengthening
measures. The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects observed
on the element of structure are detailed below:

4.10.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of minor bridge at Ch-38+890(LHS)
Sever Shear and Flexure Cracks have been observed at some locations on the longitudinal
girders G1 & G4 and G2 & G3 also having minor cracks. The damaged and cracked surfaces
to be repaired as detailed below:
Volume-1.
4.10.2.3Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck Slab of structure
During visual inspection some local damages, localized leaching and cracks seen between
girders G1-G2 on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:
(i) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
in Para 6.3.
(j) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
G2-G3 and G3-G4 in span A1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G2-G3 and G3-G4 in span
A1-A2 to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the
4.10.2.5Bearings
Near around all the Elastomeric bearings cleaning to be done properly. Wooden blocks to
be removed below the girder G-4 at abutment A-2.

expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Both the damaged rubber seal to be replaced
by new one.
It is observed that all the drainage spout corroded and require replacement. The drainage
spouts are required to be re-placed properly by new one using polymer mortar/concrete as
Photo 174(a): A View of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 174(b): A View of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).
Abutment A1 Pier P1 Abutment A2
Photo 175: A Vie w of expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 176: A Vie w of crash barriers of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).
Photo 177(a): A View of drainage spouts of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 177(b): A View of drainage spouts of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).
Photo 178: A Vie w of missed out drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 179(a): A View of bearings of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).
Photo 179(b): A Vie w of cracked bearings below girder G-2 at abutme nt A-2 of Minor Bridge
at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 180: A Vie w of shear and flexure cracks on girder G1 in span P1-A2 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-39+292(LHS).
Photo 181: A Vie w of vegetation growth on Abutment A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-

39+292(LHS).
Photo 182: A Vie w of cracks on girder of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 183: A Vie w of severe cracks and leaching seen on deck slab between girders G2-G3 in
span P1-A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).
Photo 184: A Vie w of leaching seen on deck slab between girders G2-G3 in span P1-A2 of
Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 185: A Vie w of cracks on Pier P-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).

Photo 186: A Vie w of abutment A-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-39+292(LHS).
1. Two drainage spouts missing and others get corroded and require
replacement.
2. Severe cracks and leaching have been seen in the deck slab between girder
G2-G3 in span P1-A2 and also Localized cracks on the deck slabs.
4. Honeycombing seen on deck slab girders and bearing pedesta l.
5. Pier Head of P1 cracked.
6. Wooden block seen at bearing location G4 on A1.
7. Bearing cracked at G2 on abutment A2 in span P1-A2. Minor bulging seen
on bearings.
8. Piers and abutment heads are having debris and also require some patch
works.
9. Expansion joins found full of dust. Rubber seals damaged at P1.
12. Waterways obstructed.
superstructure. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure and super

4.11.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of structure
Both the abutment heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, cracks
have been seen on the abutment walls. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
4.11.2.2Strengthening Measures for Pie r P-1 of structure
Pier head of the Pier P-1 have to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages,
cracks have been seen on the pier. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
(b)Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1.The cracks to be
monitored using glass strip for a further period of one year.
Sever Shear and Flexure Cracks have been observed at some locations on the longitudinal
girders. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
Volume-1.
4.11.2.4Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck Slab of structures
During visual inspection some local damages, localized leaching between girders G2-G3 in
the span P1-A2 and cracks seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:
in Para 6.3.
G2-G3 span P1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G2-G3 in span P1-A2 to be


4.11.2.6 Bearings
Near around all the Elastomeric bearings cleaning to be done properly. Wooden blocks
have to be removed below the girder G-4 at abutment A-1. If required, the cracked bearing
below girder G-2 at Abutment A-2 has to be replaced after monitoring the same for a
period of six months.
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. The damaged rubber seal at P-1 have to be
replaced by new one.
It is observed that two drainage spout missing and others corroded and require replacement.
The drainage spouts are required to be re-placed properly by new one using polymer
4.11.2.10 Wate rways
There is an obstruction of waterways; the same have to be cleaned properly.

Photo 187: A Vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).
Photo 188: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).

Photo 189: A Vie w of railings and crash barriers of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).
Photo 190(a): A View of drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).

Photo 190(b): A View of missed drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).
Photo 191: A View of bearing locks below G3 on A1 & G4 at A2; bearing pedestal cracked at
G4 on Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).

Photo 192: A Vie w of cracked deck slab between girders G3-G4 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
43+650(LHS).
Photo 193: A Vie w of cracked deck slab between girders G2-G3 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
43+650(LHS).

Photo 194: A Vie w of shear cracks on girders of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).
Photo 195:A Vie w of marking of cracks on girders of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).

Photo 196: A Vie w of shear cracks on girder of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).
Photo 197: A Vie w of cracks on girders of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).
Photo 198: A Vie w of reinforce ment exposed on bearing pedestal of Minor Bridge at Ch-
43+650(LHS).

Photo 199: A Vie w of waterways of Minor Bridge at Ch-43+650(LHS).
components of the structures are shown in Photos 187to 199 in Para 4.12 above. The
1. All drainage spouts get corroded and require replacement.

2. Severe cracks have been seen in the deck slab between G2-G3 and G3-G4 and also
some Localized cracks and leaching seen between G1-G2.
4. Honeycombing seen on deck slab, cross girders and abutments.
5. Bearing locks have been seen below G3 at A1 and G4 at A2 on abutments. Bearing
pedestal cracked at G4. Bearing are getting corroded. In some of the bearings
pedestal reinforcement exposed.
6. Abutment heads are having debris and also require some patch works. Dirt wall is
having honeycombing at some locations.
7. Expansion joins found full of dust. Rubber seals damaged at A1.
10. Waterways obstructed.

of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful in abutments. The
cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure and super structure. The
Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed methodology for the
strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the
Both the abutment heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey
combing has been observed on the abutment walls. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
Sever Shear and Flexure Cracks and honey combed surfaces have been observed at some
locations on the longitudinal girders. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as
detailed below:
Volume-1.
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing, localized leaching and cracks
seen between girders G1-G2 on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:
(k) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer mortar as
in Para 6.3.
(l) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
G2-G3 and G3-G4 in span A1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G2-G3 and G3-G4 in span
A1-A2 to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the

4.12.2.5Bearings
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly and bearing locks to be removed.
Bearings have to be painted properly.
4.12.2.6 Bearings Pedestal:
The cracked bearing pedestal below girder G-4 at A-2 to be pressure grouted and repaired as
detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. The damaged rubber seal at A-1 to be
4.12.2.10Wate rways:
Waterways have to be cleaned properly.
4.13 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Chainage 47+053(LHS)
Photos 199 to 186 show typical view of the major bridge and conditions of its various

Photo 200: A Vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-47+053(LHS).
Photo 201: A vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-47+053.

Photo 202: A vie w of Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.
Photo 203: A vie w of expansion joint of Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.

Photo 204: A vie w of Abutment-A1 of Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.
Photo 205: A vie w of NDT on pie r and abutment of Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.

Photo 206: A vie w of Pier P-4 of Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.
Photo 207: A vie w of Span P5-A2 of Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.

Photo 208: A view of localized leaching through deck slab of the Major Bridge at chainage
47+053.
47+053.

Photo 209: A vie w of localized leaching near pie r P4 in the span P4-P5 through deck slab of the
Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.
Photo 210: A vie w of exposed reinforcement on the bottom of deck slab of the Major Bridge at
chainage 47+053.

47+053.
Photo 212: A vie w of localized leaching through deck slab of the Major Bridge at chainage
47+053.

Photo 213: A vie w of corroded railings at pier head of the Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.
Photo 214: A vie w of vegetation growth under the Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.

Photo 215: A vie w of vegetation growth under the Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.
Photo 216: A vie w of broken apron around pie r of the Major Bridge at chainage 47+053.

47+053.
47+053.

following are the general observations on the major bridge:
1. All drainage spouts missing in span P3-P2. In other spans some drainage spouts
missing and some got corroded and require replacement.
2. Localized cracks and leaching seen in the entire length of the bridge. However,
severe leaching seen in the cantilever portion of the span P1-P2.
3. Almost all bearings are in locked position.
4. Honeycombing seen at some locations on deck slab, piers and abutments.
5. Exposed reinforcement seen on the soffit of deck slab in the mid span of P4-P5.
6. Abutment heads are having debris and also require some patch works. Dirt wall is
having honeycombing at some locations.
7. Expansion joins found full of dust. Rubber seals to be replaced at both abutments A-
1 & A-2.
10. Apron around piers damaged.
11. Dense vegetation growth and waterways obstructed.
4.13.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Major Bridge at Chainage 47+053(LHS)
of the report. The core test results show that the quality of concrete is poor in deck slab. The
UPV test results so that the quality of concrete varies doubtful to good in substructure and
superstructure. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure and
super structure. Depth of carbonation in the deck slab is in the order of 15 to 20mm.The Para-
6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed methodology for the strengthening
measures. The remedial repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects observed
on the element of structure are detailed below:
4.13.2.1 Strengthening Measures for Abutment and dirt Walls of Major Bridge at Chainage
47+053(LHS)
4.13.2.2 Strengthening Measures for piers of Major Bridge at Chainage 47+053(LHS)
The entire pier heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey
combing has been observed on piers. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:


During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing, localized leaching and cracks
seen in the entire length of the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:
detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the polymer conc rete as detailed
in Para 6.3.
4.13.2.4 Strengthening of severe leaching/cracked cantilever Deck Slab of structure
During visual inspection severe leaching/cracks have been seen; on the cantilever portion
of the deck slab in the span P1-P2 of the major bridge. The portion of the severe cracked
cantilever Deck slab in span P1-P2 to be pressure grouted in a grid of 1mX1m as detailed in para
6.2.
4.13.2.5Bearings
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. The damaged rubber seals at A-1 and A-2
have to be replaced by new one.
All the missed out and corroded drainage spouts have to be replaced by new one using
Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Corroded hand rails of crash barriers
required proper painting/ some portion replacement by new one.
4.13.2.9 Railings of pier head
Corroded hand rails of crash barriers required proper painting/ some portion replacement by
new one.

4.13.2.10 Wate rways:
Waterways have to be cleaned properly.
Photo 219: Top vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).
Photo 220: Side view of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).

Photo 222: A Vie w of Crash Barrier & rusted Railing of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).

Photo 223: A Vie w of drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).
Photo 224: A Vie w of drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).
Photo 225: A view of cracked bearing pedestal below G1 at P1 in span A1-P1 of Minor Bridge
at Ch-48+966(LHS).

Photo 226: A vie w of cracked bearing pedestal of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).
Photo 227: A vie w of locked bearing below G1 at pier P1 in span P1-A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
48+966(LHS).
Photo 228: A vie w of bearings of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).

Photo 229: A vie w of locked bearings of Minor Bridge at Ch-48+966(LHS).
Photo 230: A view of flexure and shear cracks on girde r G1 of span P1 -A2 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-48+966(LHS).
Photo 231: A vie w of flexure cracks on girde r G1 of span P1 -A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
48+966(LHS).

Photo 232: A vie w of honey combed girde r G4 at P1 in span P1-A1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
48+966(LHS).
Photo 233: A view of sever cracks between girders G2 -G3 in span P1-A2 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-48+966(LHS).

Photo 234: A view of sever cracks between girders G2-G3 in span P1-A1 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-48+966(LHS).
Photo 235:A view of sever cracks between girde rs G3-G4 in span P1-A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
48+966(LHS).

Photo 236:A vie w of sever leaching in cantilever deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-
48+966(LHS).
1. Drainage spouts got corroded and require replacement.

2. Severe cracks and leaching seen in the deck slab as follows:
(a) Between G2-G3 and G3-G4 in span P1-A2.

(b) Between G2-G3 in span P1-A1.
(c) Localized Leaching seen in the cantilever portion.
3. Bearings are in locked position at G1 on pier P1 in span P1-A2 and all bearings
at A2.

5. Bearing pedestal cracked below girder G1 at P1 in span A1-P1 and honeycombed

in almost all locations.
6. Honeycombing seen at ends of G-4 girders at P1 in both the spans.
7. Abutment and pier heads are having debris and also require some patch works.
Dirt wall is having honeycombing at some locations.
girders. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure and super
4.14.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls and Pier of minor bridge at Ch-48+966
(LHS)
4.14.2.2 Repair/Strengthening of Girders of minor bridge at Ch-48+966 (LHS)
detailed below:
Volume-1.
4.14.2.3Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck Slab of minor bridge at Ch-48+966
(LHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing, localized leaching and
cracks seen on the cantilever deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:

(a) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer

mortar as detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the polymer
concrete as detailed in Para 6.3.
(b) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in
para 6.2.
4.14.2.4 Strengthening of severe cracked Deck Slab of minor bridge at Ch-48+966 (LHS)
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between girders G2-
G3 and G3-G4 in span P1-A2 and G2-G3 in span P1-A1. The portion of the severe cracked
Deck slab to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating
the corroded reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60
grade has to be used for the severe cracked deck slab portion.
4.14.2.5Bearings of minor bridge at Ch-48+966 (LHS)
4.14.2.6 Bearings Pedestal minor bridge at Ch-48+966 (LHS)
The cracked bearing pedestal below girder G-1 at P-1 in span A1-P1 and some other
locations to be pressure grouted and repaired as detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume
1.
4.14.2.7 Expansion Joints of minor bridge at Ch-48+966 (LHS)
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. The damaged rubber seals to be replaced by
new one.
4.14.2.8 Drainage Spouts of minor bridge at Ch-48+966 (LHS)
4.14.2.9 Crash Barrier of minor bridge at Ch-48+966 (LHS)

Photo 238: Side view of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).

Photo 239: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).
Photo 240: A Vie w of crash barriers of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).

Photo 241: A Vie w of blocked drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).
Photo 242: A Vie w of corroded drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).

Photo 243: A Vie w of vegetation growth on Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).
Photo 244: A Vie w of flexure and s hear cracks on girder G-3 of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925
(LHS).

(LHS).
Photo 246: A Vie w of shear cracks on girder G-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).

(LHS).
Photo 248: A Vie w of bearings of Minor Bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS).

Photo 249: A Vie w of sever crack on deck slab between girde rs G2-G3 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
49+925(LHS).
Photo 250: A Vie w of sever crack and leaching on deck slab between girders G3-G4 of Minor
Bridge at Ch-49+925(LHS).

1. All three drainage spouts got corroded and require replacement.

2. Severe cracks and leaching seen in the deck slab between girders G2-G3 and G3-G4
in span A1-A2.
3. Localized Leaching seen in the cantilever portion.
5. Bearings pedestal cracked at some locations and also honeycombed.
6. Abutment and pier heads are having debris.
7. Abutments, Dirt wall is having honeycombing at some locations.
11. Vegetation growth seen around the structure.
the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthe ning measures to be adopted for the
4.15.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of minor bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS)
detailed below:

Volume-1.
(LHS)
detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the polyme r concrete as detailed
in Para 6.3.
G3 and G3-G4 in span A1-A2. The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab to be replaced
by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the corroded
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Bearings have to be painted
properly.
The cracked bearing pedestal to be pressure grouted and repaired as detailed in Para 6.2 and
6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.

barriers required painting/replacement by new one.
4.15.2.10 Cleaning of vegetation growth of minor bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS)
All around the structure the vegetation growth have to be cleaned.
Photo 251: Top vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).
Photo 252: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).

Photo 253: A Vie w of crash barriers of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).
Photo 254: A Vie w of drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).

Photo 255: A Vie w of one missed out and new replaced drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-
53+712 (LHS).
Photo 256: A Vie w of vegetation growth on Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).

(LHS).
Photo 258: A Vie w of localized leaching on cantilever portion of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712
(LHS)

Photo 259: A View of sever crack on deck slab between girders G2-G3 in s pan P1-A2 of Minor
Photo 260: A Vie w of honey combed deck slab on Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).

Photo 261: A Vie w of cracked Pie r head at Pier P-1of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS)
Photo 262: A Vie w of repaired deck slab in span A1-P1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).

Photo 263: A Vie w of severe cracked deck slab between girders G1-G2 in span A1-P1 of Minor
Photo 264: A Vie w of debris on abutment A1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).

Photo 265: A Vie w of debris on abutment A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS).
1. One drainage spout missing and others already replaced by new one. Concrete
around drainage spout needs repair.
2. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2, G2-G3 and G3-G4 in
span P1-A2.
3. Deck slab A1-P1 already repaired with Pressure grouting. However, severe cracks
seen between girders G1-G2 in the spanA1-P1.
4. Pier P1 is having vertical crack.
7. Bearings pedestal damaged at some locations and also honeycombed.
9. Abutments, Dirt wall, deck slab are having honeycombing at some locations.
10. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged.
13. Vegetation growth seen around structure.

the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthe ning measures to be adopted for the
4.16.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of minor bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS)
4.16.2.2Strengthening Measures for pier of minor bridge at Ch-49+925 (LHS)
Pier head have to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, cracks honey
combing has been observed on the pier. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
detailed below:
Volume-1.
(LHS)

(b) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in
para 6.2.

G2, G2-G3 and G3-G4 in span P1-A2. The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab to be
properly.
The damaged, honeycombed bearing pedestal to be repaired as detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1 &
6.3 in Volume 1.
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Damaged rubber seals to be replaced by new
one, if required.
It is observed that one drainage spout missing and other replaced new drainage spouts
leaking. All around the drainage spout required proper concreting. The drainage spouts
required to be repaired/re-placed properly by new one using polymer mortar/concrete as
Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Corroded hand ra ils of the crash
4.16.2.11 Cleaning of vegetation growth of minor bridge at Ch-53+712 (LHS)
4.17 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage 54+590(RHS)

Photo 266: Top vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590(RHS)
Photo 267: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).

Photo 268: A Vie w of crash barriers and railings of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).
Photo 269: A Vie w of drainage spout of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).
Photo 270: A vie w of debris on Pier head A-1of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)

Photo 271: A vie w of debris on Pier head A-1of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).
Photo 272: A vie w of re paired girder of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).
Photo 273: A vie w of severe cracks on deck slab between girders G1 -G2 on Minor Bridge at
Ch-54+590 (RHS).

Photo 274: A Vie w of longitudinal cracks on deck slab in whole length between girders G2-G3
of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
Photo 275: A Vie w of sever crack on deck slab between girde rs G2-G3 in span A1-A2 of Minor
Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).

Photo 276: A Vie w of cracks on girder G-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).
Photo 277: A Vie w of cracks on girder of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).

Photo 278: A Vie w of repaired deck slab in span A1-P1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
Photo 279: A Vie w of repaired deck slab in span A1-P1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)

Photo 280: A Vie w of abutment A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS).
1. Drainage spouts already replaced by new one. However, concrete around drainage
spout needs repair.
2. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2 and longitudinal severe
cracks in whole length between girders G2-G3.
8. Hand rails on crash barrier corroded .
4.17.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Minor Bridge at Chainage 54+590 (RHS)

4.17.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
4.17.2.2 Repair/Strengthening of Girders of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
Shear and Flexure Cracks and honey combed surfaces have been observed at some locations
on the longitudinal girders. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed
below:
Volume-1.
(RHS)
(c) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer

(d) The localized Cracks to be sealed through pressure grouting as detailed in
para 6.2.
4.17.2.4 Strengthening of severe cracked Deck Slab of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
4.17.2.5Bearings of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)

properly.
4.17.2.6 Bearings Pedestal of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
The damaged, honeycombed bearing pedestal to be repaired as detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1 &
6.3 in Volume 1.
4.17.2.7 Expansion Joints of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
one.
4.17.2.8 Drainage Spouts of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
It is observed that drainage spouts replaced by new one leaking. All around the drainage
spout required proper concreting. The drainage spouts required to be repaired by using
4.17.2.9 Crash Barrier of minor bridge at Ch-54+590 (RHS)
Photo 281: Top vie w of Minor B ridge at Ch-55+390(RHS).

Photo 282: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390(RHS).
Photo 283: A Vie w of crash barriers and railings of Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS).
Photo 284 : Drainage spout in good conditions however partially blocked on Minor Bridge at
Ch-55+390 (RHS).

Photo 285 : Cantilever deck slab getting damaged due to improper sealing around Drainage spout on
Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS).
Photo 286: Abutment edge got damaged and reinforcement is exposed on Abutment cap
Photo 287: A Vie w of repaired deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS).

Photo 288: A View of severe cracks on deck slab between girde r G1 -G2( A-1 to mid span) of
Photo 289: A Vie w of honey combed deck slab between girders G1-G2 ( mid span to A-2) of

Photo 290: A Vie w of repaired girder of Minor Bridge at Ch- Ch-55+390 (RHS)
Photo 291: A Vie w of repaired and cracked girder G-4 of Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS).
Photo 292: A vie w of abutment of Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS).

Photo 293: A Vie w of abutment A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS).
Photo 294: A Vie w of debris on abutment A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS).

Photo 295: A Vie w of exposed reinforcement on bearing pedestal of Minor Bridge at Ch-
55+390 (RHS).
1. Both the Drainage spouts already replaced by new one. However, concrete around
drainage spout needs repair.
2. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2 and G2-G3 in A-1 to
mid span area.
3. Honey combing seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2, G2-G3 in mid span to
A-2 area and in cantilever portion.
5. In some of the bearings pedestal honeycombing and reinforcement exposed.
6. Bearings need painting.
7. Abutment heads are having debris. Local damages and reinforcement exposed.
11. Vegetation growth seen around the structure.

4.18.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of minor bridge at Ch-55+390(RHS)
below:
Volume-1.
(RHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing between girders G1-G2 and
G2-G3 in mid span to A-2 area, localized leaching and cracks seen on the cantilever deck
slab. The following measures to be adopted:

(b) The localized Cracks and honeycombed, leaching surfaces to be pressure
grouting as detailed in para 6.2.
G2 and G2-G3 in mid span to abutment A-1 area. The portion of the severe cracked Deck
slab to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the

properly.
4.18.2.6 Bearings Pedestal minor bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS)
The damaged, honeycombed bearing pedestal to be repaired as detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
one, if required.
It is observed that replaced new drainage spouts leaking. All around the drainage spout
required proper concreting. The drainage spouts required to be repaired/re-placed properly
by new one using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
4.18.2.10 Cleaning of vegetation growth of minor bridge at Ch-55+390 (RHS)

Photo 296: Top vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+000(RHS).
Photo 297: A vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+000(RHS).

Photo 299: Color faded Cras h Barrier and rusting of Railing was observed on Minor
Bridge at Ch-56+000(RHS).
Photo 300: Drainage spout replaced by new one in good conditions however partially leaking on

Photo 301: A View of severe cracks on deck slab between girder G1 -G2( A-1 to A-2) of Minor
Photo 302: A View of severe cracks on deck slab between girder G1 -G2( A-1 to A-2) of Minor

Photo 303: A View of severe cracks on deck slab between girder G2-G3( A-1 to A-2) of Minor
Photo 304: A Vie w of bearing pedestal at A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+000 (RHS).

Photo 305: A Vie w of cover measurement on abutme nt A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+000
(RHS).

Photo 307: A Vie w of cracked girder G-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+000 (RHS).
Photo 308: A vie w of abutment of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+000 (RHS).

1. Two Drainage spouts already replaced by new one. However, concrete around
2. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2 and G2-G3 in full length
and in G3-G4 in the half length (mid span to A-2).
3. Localized cracks between girders G3-G4 (A1to mid span)
below:
Volume-1.


(RHS)
in Para 6.3.
(b) The localized Cracks and honeycombed, leaching surfaces to be pressure grouting as
detailed in para 6.2.
G2 and G2-G3 in the full length and G3-G4 from mid span to A2. The portion of the severe
cracked Deck slab to be replaced by the new one by removing the affected area and proper
treating the corroded reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of
M-60 grade has to be used for the severe cracked deck slab portion.
properly.
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
one, if required.
required proper concreting. The drainage spouts required to be repaired properly by new
using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.


Photo 312: A View of color faded crash barrie rs and corroded railings of Minor Bridge at Ch-
56+465 (RHS).

Photo 313: Drainage spout replaced by new one however leakage around it seen on Minor Bridge at
Ch-56+465(RHS).
Photo 314: A Vie w of repaired deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch- Ch-56+465 (RHS)
Photo 315: A Vie w of repaire d and honey combed deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+465
(RHS).

Photo 316: A Vie w of repaired girder of Minor Bridge at Ch- Ch-56+465 (RHS)
Photo 317: A Vie w of Pier P-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+465 (RHS).
Photo 318: A view of honeycombed deck slab between girders G1-G2 in span A1-P1 of Minor

Photo 319: A view of honeycombed deck slab between girders G1-G2 in span A1-P1 of Minor
Photo 320: A Vie w of joint inspection of CRRI and Safe ways Concessionaire of Minor Bridge
at Ch-56+465 (RHS).

Photo 321: A Vie w of cover measurement of abutme nt of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+465 (RHS).
Photo 322: A Vie w of repair of girde rs of Minor Bridge at Ch-56+465 (RHS).

1. Drainage spouts already replaced by new one. However, concrete around drainage
spout needs repair.

2. Minor surface repair work carried out in the superstructures (deck slab and girders).
3. Honey combing seen in the deck slab in the span A1-P1.
4. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G2-G3 and G3-G4 in the span
P1-A2. Localized leaching seen in deck slab between G1-G2 and G2-G3 in the span
P1-A2.
11. Vegetation growth observed around the structure.
4.20.2.2Strengthening Measures for Pie r of minor bridge at Ch-56+465(RHS)
Pier heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey combing has
been observed on the pier. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
4.20.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Girders of minor bridge at Ch-56+465(RHS)
below:

Volume-1.
(RHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing between girders G1-G2 and
G2-G3 and G3-G4 in mid span to P-1 area in span A1-P1, localized leaching and cracks
seen between girders G1-G2 and G2-G3 in mid span to A-2 area in span P1-A2. The

(d) The localized Cracks and honeycombed, leaching surfaces to be pressure
G2 and G3-G4 span P1-A2. The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab to be replaced by
the new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the corroded reinforcement
as detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60 grade has to be used for the
severe cracked deck slab portion.
properly.
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
one, if required.
required proper concreting. The drainage spouts required to be repaired/re-placed
properly by new one using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol.

1.

Photo 327: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS).
57+859 (RHS).
Photo 329: Corroded Drainage spout seen on Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS).

Photo 330 : Rusted Down take pipe along with deteriorated concrete on Minor Bridge at Ch-
57+859 (RHS).
Photo 331: A Vie w of cracks on girder G-4 of Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS)
Photo 332(a): A View of cracks on girde r G-4 of Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS)

Photo 332(b): A View of exposed reinforcement at the end of girder on Minor Bridge at Ch-
57+859 (RHS)

Photo 334: A Vie w of cracks on girder G-1of Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS)
Photo 335: A View of honey combed deck slab between girders G2-G3 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
57+859 (RHS).
Photo 336: A Vie w of sever crack between girders G1-G2on deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-
57+859 (RHS)

Photo 337: A Vie w of repaired deck slab on Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS).
Photo 338: A vie w of damaged and honeycombed bearing pedestal of Minor Bridge at Ch-
57+859 (RHS).

Photo 339: A vie w of abutment head at A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS).

4.21.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage 57+859 (RHS)
1. Drainage spouts badly corroded and concrete around drainage spout needs repair.
3. Honey combing seen in the deck slab between G2-G3 Girders in the span.
4. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2 and G2-G3 in the span.
5. Longitudinal cracks seen in deck slab between G2-G3 and G3-G4 in the span.
6. Severe Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on the girder G2 and minor cracks
on other girders.
7. Abutment heads are having debris.
9. Corroded Hand rails to be replaced by new one.
10. Crash barriers to be painted.
11. Vegetation growth observed around the structure.
12. Damaged bearing pedestal observed.
4.21.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Minor Bridge at Chainage 57+859 (RHS)
4.21.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of minor bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS)
below:

Volume-1.
(RHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing longitudinal cracks seen
between girders G2-G3 and G3-G4 in span A1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:

properly.
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
one, if required.
It is observed that corroded drainage spouts leaking. The drainage spouts required to be
re-placed properly by new one using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and
6.3 in Vol. 1.


Photo 344: A View of color faded crash barriers and corroded railings of Minor Bridge
at Ch-58+319(RHS).

Photo 345: Corroded Drainage spout seen on Minor Bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS).

Photo 346: A vie w of debris over abutme nt head at A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-58+319 (RHS)
Photo 347: A Vie w of bearings of Minor Bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS).
Photo 348: A Vie w of bearings on Abutme nt A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS).

Photo 349: A Vie w of water marks on cantilever deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-
58+319(RHS).
Photo 350: - A view of Transverse cracks on Pier cap at Minor Bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS).
Photo 351: No Gap between the adjoining spans of Girders over Pier P-1 of minor bridge at
Ch-58+319(RHS).

Photo 352: Repairing of Girde rs observed on minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS).
Photo 353: A Vie w of vertical crack on both the faces of pier head of pie r –P-1 of Minor Bridge
at Ch-58+319(RHS)
Photo 354: A Vie w of cracks on girder G-4 in span P1-A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS).

Photo 355: A Vie w of cracks on girder of Minor Bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS).
4.22.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage Ch-58+319(RHS)
1. Drainage spouts corroded and concrete around drainage spout needs repair.
3. Vertical Crack seen in the pier head of Pier P-1. Horizontal crack seen at abutment
A-2.
6. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged. It is also observed that
at Pier P-1girders of adjoining spans are meeting with each other.
7. Bearings require painting.
4.22.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Minor Bridge at Chainage Ch-58+319(RHS)


4.22.2.2Strengthening Measures for Pie r P-1 of minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS)
Pier head have to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey combing
has been observed on the pier. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
(b)Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1.The crack widths to
be monitored by pasting glass strips.
below:
Volume-1.
4.22.2.4Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck Slab of minor bridge at Ch-
58+319(RHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing, leaching and localized cracks
seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:

4.22.2.5Bearings of minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS)
properly.
4.22.2.6 Bearings Pedestal minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS)
& 6.3 in Volume 1.

4.22.2.7 Expansion Joints of minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS)
one, if required. It is also observed that at Pier P-1girders of adjoining spans are meeting
with each other; proper gaps to be provided.
4.22.2.8 Drainage Spouts of minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS)
6.3 in Vol. 1.
4.22.2.9 Crash Barrier of minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS)
repairing work to be carried out; with polymer mortar/concrete as explained in para 6.1
and 6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Corroded hand rails of the
crash barriers required painting/replacement by new one.
4.22.2.10 Cleaning of vegetation growth of minor bridge at Ch-58+319(RHS)
4.23 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage -58+724(RHS)

Photo 358: A Vie w of colour faded crash barriers and corroded railings of Minor Bridge at Ch-
58+724(RHS).

Photo 359: Corroded Drainage spout seen on Minor Bridge at Ch-58+724(RHS).
Photo 360: A view of locked Bearing below girder G-3 at A-2 on Minor Bridge at Ch-
58+724(RHS).
Photo 361: Void observed on the bottom of the Girder G-3 on Minor Bridge at Ch-58+724 (RHS).

Photo 362: Reinforcement exposed on the bottom of the Girder G-3 seen on Minor Bridge at Ch-
58+724(RHS).
Photo 363: A Vie w of repaired girder G-3 of Minor Bridge at Ch-58+724 (RHS)

Photo 365: A Vie w of repaired girders of Minor Bridge at Ch-58+724 (RHS)
Photo 367: A Vie w of sever cracks between girde rs G1-G2on deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-
58+724(RHS).

Photo 368: A Vie w of sever cracks between girde rs G1-G2on deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-
58+724(RHS).

1. Drainage spouts badly corroded and concrete around drainage spout needs repair.
3. Honey combing seen between the girders G2-G3 and G3-G4 in the deck slab in the
whole span.
4. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2 in the span.
5. Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on all the girders.
7. Bearings found in lock in position below the girders G1,G2,G3 at A2.
The Non destructive Tests have also been carried out as detailed in Para- 5 in the Volume
– 1 of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful in abutments
and girders. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure and
super structure. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed
methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthening measures
to be adopted for the defects observed on the element of structure are detailed below:

Shear and Flexure Cracks and honey combed surfaces have been observed at some
detailed below:
Volume-1.
4.23.2.4Strengthening of localized honeycombing/leaching/cracked Deck Slab of minor bridge
at Ch-58+724(RHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing(between girders G2-G3 and
G3-G4), leaching and localized cracks seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be
adopted:

4.23.2.5Strengthening of severe cracked Deck Slab of minor bridge at Ch-58+724(RHS)
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between Girders
G1-G2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2 to be replaced by the
new one by removing the affected area and proper treating the corroded reinforcement as
detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60 grade has to be used for the
severe cracked deck slab portion.

Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Bearing locks to be cut below
girders G-1, G-2, G-3 at abutment A-2.Bearings have to be painted properly.
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
one, if required.
6.3 in Vol. 1.

59+510 (RHS).
Photo 374: Corroded Drainage spout seen on Minor Bridge at Ch-59+510 (RHS).

Photo 377: A Vie w of leaching on the deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-59+510 (RHS)

Photo 378: A Vie w of exposed reinforce ment on the deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-59+510
(RHS)
Photo 379: A Vie w of localize d cracks on deck slab between girders G3-G4 of Minor Bridge at
Ch-59+510 (RHS)

1. All the three drainage spouts corroded and concrete around drainage spout needs
repair.
3. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2 and G2-G3 in the span.
4. Localized cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G3- G4 in the span.
6. Abutment heads are having debris. Exposed reinforcement has been seen on
Abutment head of A1 and A2.
7. Bearings have been found corroded.
methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthe ning measures
below:

Volume-1.
at Ch-59+510(RHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing, leaching and localized cracks
(between girders G3-G4),seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:

During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab between Girders
G1-G2 and G2-G3. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab between Girder G1-G2 and G2-G3 to be
reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60 grade has to
be used for the severe cracked deck slab portion.
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. After removing corrosions
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
one, if required.

6.3 in Vol. 1.
and 6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Corroded hand ra ils of the

60+006(RHS).
Photo 383: partially blocked Drainage spout seen on Minor Bridge at Ch-60+006(RHS).
Photo 384 :Deteriorated concrete around drainage spout on Minor Bridge at Ch-60+006(RHS).

Photo 385: A Vie w of leaking water through expansion joint and patch repair of Minor Bridge
at Ch-60+006(RHS).
Photo 386:A Vie w of cracks on girder G-4 in span P1-P2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-60+006(RHS).
Photo 387: A Vie w of damaged edge at the end of girder at Pie r P-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch -
57+859 (RHS)

Photo 388:A Vie w of bearing lock below girder G-4 at A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-
60+006(RHS).
Photo389: A Vie w of bearings of Minor Bridge at Ch-60+006(RHS).
Photo 337: A Vie w of repaired deck slab on Minor Bridge at Ch-57+859 (RHS).
Photo 390: A vie w of repaired deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-60+006(RHS).

1. All the drainage spouts needs cleaning and concrete around drainage spout needs
repairs.
2. Minor surface repair work carried out in the superstructures.
3. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab in the span A1-P1 and A2-P2.
5. Abutment heads are having debris. Exposed reinforcement has been seen on
Abutment and pier heads.
4.25.2.2Strengthening Measures for piers of minor bridge at Ch-60+006(RHS)
Both the pier heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey
combing has been observed on the piers. The surfaces to be repaired as follows:
below:

Volume-1.
at Ch-60+006(RHS)
During visual inspection some local damages, honey combing, leaching and localized
cracks, seen on the deck slab. The following measures to be adopted:

During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab in span A1-P1and
P2-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab to be replaced by the new one by removing
the affected area and proper treating the corroded reinforcement as detailed in para 6.6.
The self compacting concrete of M-60 grade has to be used for the severe cracked deck
slab portion.
4.25.2.7 Bearings Pedestal of minor bridge at Ch-60+006(RHS)
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
one, if required.

6.3 in Vol. 1.
4.26 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Chainage -60+543(RHS)
Photo 391: A vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS).

Photo 392: A Top and Longitudinal view of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS).
Photo 393: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)

Photo 394: A View of color faded crash barrie rs and corroded railings of Major Bridge at Ch-
60+543(RHS).
Photo 395: Corroded and some missed out Drainage spout seen on Major Bridge at Ch-
60+543(RHS)

Photo 396: A Vie w of inspection through MBIU of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)
Photo 397: A Vie w of locked bearings of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)

Photo 398 : A Vie w of wooden blocks(below G2 & G3 girders) and left out bearing lock(
below G1 girder) at pier P-2 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)

Photo 399: A Vie w of locked bearings below girders on Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)
Photo 400(a): A View of wooden blocks left out on bearing locations below girders G2 & G3 at
P-2 and left out bearing locks below girders G1, G2, G3 at pie r P-1 of Major
Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)

Photo 400(b): A Vie w of left out wooden blocks and bearing locks below girder G3 at P-2 of
Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)
Photo 401: A Vie w of inspection of span A1-P1 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)
Photo 402: A Vie w of NDT on Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)

Photo 403: A Vie w of transverse cracks in span A1 -P1 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS)
Photo 404 : A Vie w of crack on we b and soffit slab of super structure of Major Bridge at Ch-
60+543 (RHS).

Photo 405: A Vie w of inspection of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).
Photo 406: A Vie w of corroded locked bearing( below girder G2 at A-2) of Major Bridge at
Ch-60+543 (RHS).

Photo 407: A Vie w of repaired work in span P2-A2 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).
Photo 408: A Vie w of span P1-P2 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).

Photo 409: A Vie w of Deck Slab of span P1-P2 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).
Photo 410: A View of pier head and Deck Slab at Pier P-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543
(RHS).

Photo 411: A Vie w of inspection of pier head at Pier P-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).
Photo 412: A Vie w of inspection of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS) by CRRI.

Photo 413: A Vie w of honeycombed pier head at Pier P-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).
Photo 414: A View of cracked web of deck slab at Pier P-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543
(RHS).

Photo 415: A vie w of abutment A-2of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).
Photo 416: A vie w of abutment A-1of Major Bridge at Ch-60+543 (RHS).
4.26.1 General Observations on Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-60+543(RHS)
1. Bearing Locks and Wooden blocks have been seen below girder G3at pier P2. Bearings
locks not removed at pier P-1(below girders G-2 and G-3), P-2(below G3) and A-2
(below G-2).
2. Bearings pedestal cracked at G-1 on abutment A-1 and at G-3 on pier P-2.
3. Five drainage spouts corroded, five found missing and two seems in good condition;
concrete around drainage spout needs repair.
4. Minor surface repair work carried out on the deck slab, pier and abutment heads..
5. Localized cracks and leaching seen on the deck slab throughout the bridge.
6. Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on all the voided slabs.

10. Railing around pier heads needs painting.

11. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged at abutment A1 and A2.
12. Corroded Hand rails on crash barriers to be replaced/painted by new one.
4.26.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-60+543(RHS)
piers and deck slab. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure
and super structure. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed
4.26.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
Both the abutment heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages,
honey combing has been observed on the abutment walls. The surfaces to be repaired
as follows:
(a)By the polymer mortar /concrete as detailed in the para 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume-1
and
(b)Cracks to be pressure grouted as detailed in para 6.2 in Volume-1.
4.26.2.2Strengthening Measures for piers of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
and
4.26.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of voided slab of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
Shear and Flexure Cracks, leaching and honey combed surfaces have been observed at
some locations on the voided slab. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as
detailed below:
(a) The local damaged surfaces of voided slab to be cleaned properly and repaired at the
Volume-1.

4.26.2.4Bearings of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Wooden blocks and bearing
locks to be removed properly from all the locations as detailed in Para 4.26.1 After
removing corrosions Bearings have to be painted properly.
4.26.2.5 Bearings Pedestal of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
The damaged, honeycombed, cracked bearing pedestal ( below G1 on abutment A1 and G3

at P2) to be repaired as detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
4.26.2.6 Expansion Joints of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
one.
4.26.2.7 Drainage Spouts of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
It is observed that there are 5 nos. of corroded drainage spouts and five nos. missed out
drainage spout leaking. These 10 nos. drainage spouts required to be re-placed properly
by new one using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
4.26.2.8 Crash Barrier of major bridge at Ch-60+543(RHS)
4.26.2.9 Apron around the piers
It is observed that aprons damaged around the piers; the same to be reconstructed using M-
30 concrete.

Photo 417: A vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 418: A Top vie w of Major Bridge at 67+047(RHS)

Photo 419: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Major Bridge at Ch- 67+047(RHS).
Photo 420: A View of color faded crash barrie rs and corroded railings of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+047(RHS)

Photo 421: Corroded drainage spout seen on Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 421: A view of missed out Drainage spout near pier P-2 in span P2-P3 and leakage through
drainage spout on Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

Photo 422: A Vie w of inspection through MBIU of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 423: A Vie w of NDT on Pier P-1 of the Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

Photo 424: A Vie w of Pier head P-1 of the Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 425: A Vie w of locked and corroded bearings at pier P2 below girde r G1,G2
and G3 in the span P2-P3 of Major Bridge at Ch 67+047(RHS)

Photo 426(a): A vie w of NDT on Pier head P-2 of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 426(b): A View of vegetation growth below the Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

Photo 427: A Vie w of leaching on pier head and vegetation growth of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+047(RHS)
Photo 428: A Vie w of Pier P-2 of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

Photo 429: A Vie w of repaired work on Pie r head P-5 of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 430: A Vie w of span P4-P5 of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

Photo 431: A Vie w of Deck Slab of span P5-P4 of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 432: A Vie w of localize d leaching on deck slab of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047 (RHS)

Photo 433:AVie w of honeycombed deck slab in span P7-A2 of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+047(RHS)
Photo 434: A View of localized leaching on deck slab in span A2 -P-7 of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+047(RHS)

Photo 435: A vie w of abutment A-2of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
Photo 436: A vie w of abutment A-1of Major Bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

1. Bearing Locks seen at G1, G2, G3 on pier P-2 in the span P2-P3.
2. Drainage spouts in span A1-P1leaking and one missing near P2 in span P2-P3;
concrete around drainage spout needs repair.
3. Minor surface repair work carried out on the deck slab, pier and abutment heads.
4. Localized leaching seen on the deck slab at A1-P1 and throughout in the cantilever
portion of the bridge.
5. Flexure and shear Cracks have been seen on all the voided slab spans.
9. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged A1, P4 and A2.
10. Corroded hand rails on crash barriers to be replaced by new one /painted.
4.27.2 Suggestions for re habilitation of the Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-67+047(RHS)

of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful to good in abutments
piers and deck slab. The cover provided in general meets the requirement in sub structure
and super structure. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed
4.27.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutme nt Walls of major bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

and
combing, leaching and cracks have been observed on the piers. The surfaces to be repaired
as follows:
and

4.27.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of voided slab of major bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)
detailed below:
Volume-1.
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Bearing locks to be removed
properly below girders G1, G2 and G3 on pier P-2 in span P2-P3. After removing corrosions
The damaged, honeycombed, cracked bearing pedestal (to be repaired as detailed in Para
6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Damaged rubber seals at locations A1, P4 and
A2 to be replaced by new one .
It is observed that one of the drainage spouts missed out in span P2-P3 and drainage spout
in span A1-P1 leaking. The missed out drainage spouts required to be re-placed and
leaking drainage spout to be concreted properly by new one using polymer
4.27.2.9 Railings around pier head of major bridge at Ch-67+047(RHS)

All the steel railings around pier heads to be painted proper after removal of corrosion.
4.27.2.10 Removal of Vegetation Growth
Vegetation growth has been seen on the abutment and pier heads. There is lot of
vegetation growth also seen below and around the structure. The vegetation growth should
be removed properly.
4.28 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Chainage -67+975(LHS)
Photo 437: A vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
Photo 438: Top vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)

Photo 439: Rubber seal damaged, angle rusted and concrete damaged observed in Expansion joints of
Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
Photo 440: A vie w of corroded and missing drainage spouts on Major Bridge at 67+975(LHS)

Photo 441: A Vie w of wooden blocks left out on bearing pedestals of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+975(RHS)
Photo 441: A Vie w of wooden blocks left out on bearing pedestals below girders G1 &G2 at
Pier P-5 in span P5-P6 of Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(RHS)

Photo 442:A view of locked bearing at pier P-5 in span P5-P6 of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+975(RHS)
Photo 443:A vie w of locked bearing below G-3 at P-6 in span P6-P7 and belowG3at pier P-8 in
span P7-P8 of Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(RHS)
Photo 444:A vie w of locked bearing at pier P-8 in span P8-A2 of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+975(RHS)

Photo 445: A vie w of inspection through MBIU of Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(RHS)
Photo 446: A Vie w of cracks on soffit slab and we bs of voided slabs of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+975(LHS)

Photo 447: A Vie w of cracks on soffit of voided slab in span P8-A2 in span of Major Bridge at
Ch-67+975(LHS)
Photo 448: A Vie w of pie r and pier heads of the Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)

Photo 449: A Vie w of abutment A-2of the Major Bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
Photo 450:A View of damaged rubber seal at Abutme nt A-2 of Major Bridge at Ch-
67+975(LHS)

Photo 451: A View of exposed reinforce ment on Pier P-5 of Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)
(RHS).
Photo 452:A Vie w of localized leaching on cantilever deck slab of Major Bridge at
Ch67+975(LHS)

Photo 453:A Vie w of localized leaching on cantilever deck slab of Major Bridge at
Ch67+975(LHS)
Photo 454: A Vie w of exposed reinforce ment on pie r of Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)

Photo 455: A Vie w of eroded surface on pier of Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)
Photo 456: A Vie w of patch repair on Pier P-8 of Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)

Photo 457: A Vie w of minor cracks on Pie r of Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)
Photo 458: A Vie w of Pier P-4 of Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)

Photo 459: A Vie w of inspection of Abutme nt A-1 of Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)
Photo 460: A Vie w of NDT of Girder at Abutme nt A-1 on Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)

Photo 461: A Vie w of vegetation growth on Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)
Photo 462: A Vie w of localize d leaching of deck slab on Major Bridge at Ch67+975(LHS)

4.28.1 General Observations on Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-67+975(LHS)
1. Wooden blocks seen below girders G1and G2 on Pier P5 in the span P5-P6. Bearing
Locks also seen on pier P5 in the span P5-P6, at G3 on Pier P6 in the span P6-P7, at
G3 on Pier P8 in the span P7-P8, at G2 & G3 on Pier P8 in the span P8-A2 and at
abutment A1& A2.
2. Three drainage spouts in span A2-P8, two in span P7-P8 are missing and one
corroded in span A2-P8. Concrete around drainage spout needs repair.
3. Minor surface repair work carried out on the deck slab, pier and abutment heads.
4. Localized leaching seen on the deck slab at A1-P1 and throughout in the cantilever
portion of the bridge.
5. Flexure and shear Cracks have been seen on all the voided slab spans.
10. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged A1, P3, P6 and A2.
11. Corroded hand rails on crash barriers to be replaced by new one.
13. Vegetation growth seen below the bridge.
4.28.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-67+975(LHS)

of the report. NDT results and core test show that the quality of concrete is poor in
abutments piers and deck slab. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the
detailed methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthening
measures to be adopted for the defects observed on the element of structure are detailed
below:
4.28.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)

and
4.28.2.2Strengthening Measures for piers of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
combing, exposed reinforcement and cracks have been observed on the piers. The surfaces
to be repaired as follows:

and
(c) Cracked and eroded piers to be pressure grouted and Jacketed as detailed in Para
6.2 and 6.4 in Volume-1
4.28.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of voided slab of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
detailed below:
(a) The local damaged surfaces of voided slab to repaired at the required locations up to
40mm depth by the polymer mortar as detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm
depth as detailed in Para 6.3 in Volume-1.
(b) Cracks and leaching on the voided slab to be repaired by pressure grouting as detailed
in the Para 6.2 in Volume-1.
4.28.2.4Bearings of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Wooden blocks have been seen
below girders G1and G2 on Pier P5 in the span P5-P6. Bearing Locks also seen on pier P5
in the span P5-P6, at G3 on Pier P6 in the span P6-P7, at G3 on Pier P8 in the span P7-P8,
at G2 & G3 on Pier P8 in the span P8-A2 and at abutment A1& A2.After removing
wooden blocks , locks on bearings and corrosions Bearings have to be painted properly.
4.28.2.5 Bearings Pedestal of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
The damaged, honeycombed, cracked bearing pedestal to be repaired as detailed in Para 6.2
and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
4.28.2.6 Expansion Joints of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Damaged rubber seals at locations A1, P3,P6
and A2 to be replaced by new one .
4.28.2.7 Drainage Spouts of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
It is observed that three drainage spouts in span A2-P8 and two in span P7-P8 are missing.
One drainage spout corroded in span P8-A2. Some of the drainage spouts leaking and
needs proper Concreting all around. The missed out and corroded drainage spouts require

to be re-placed by new one and leaking drainage spout to be concreted properly using
4.28.2.8 Crash Barrier of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
4.28.2.9 Railings around pier head of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
All the steel railings around the pier heads to be painted properly after removal of corrosion.
4.28.2.10 Removal of Vegetation Growth of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
There is lot of vegetation growth seen below and around the structure. The vegetation
growth should be removed properly.
4.28.2.11 Apron around pier of major bridge at Ch-67+975(LHS)
Some of the aprons damaged around piers to be re-concreted using M-35 grade of concrete.

Photo 464: A vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS).
Abutment A1 Pier P-1 Abutment A2
76+578(LHS).

Photo 467: Some drainage spouts blocked on Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (RHS)
Photo 468: A Vie w of severe cracks on girde r of Minor in span P1-A2 Bridge at Ch-76+578
(LHS)
Photo 469: A Vie w of girde r system in span P1-A2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (LHS)

Photo 470 : Wooden planks at bearing locations G2 &G3 at P-1 in span P1-A2 on Minor
Photo 471: A Vie w of water leakage from expansion joint of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578
(RHS)
Photo 472: A Vie w of severe cracks on deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (LHS)

Photo 473: A Vie w of honey combed deck slab of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (LHS).
Photo 474: A Vie w of minor cracks between girders G1-G2on deck slab in span A1-P1 of
Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (LHS)
Photo 475: A vie w of debris at abutment head at A-2 of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (LHS).

Photo 476: A vie w of exposed reinforcement on Pier P-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (LHS).
Photo 477: A vie w of abutting girder G4 at Pier P-1 of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (LHS).

4.29.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage Ch-76+578 (LHS)
1. All the drainage spouts replaced by new one. However, concrete around drainage
spout needs repair.
2. Wooden planks have been seen on bearing pedestal at G2 and G3 on A2 abutment
and G2 and G3 at P-1 in span P1-P2.
4. Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on all the girders. Girder G4 is having
honeycombing and wide cracks.
5. Girders G4 in span P1-A1 and P1-A2 are pushing each others at P1. Similarly girder
G4 at abutment A1pushing the dirt wall.
6. Abutment and pier heads are having debris. Exposed reinforcement has been seen on
Abutment head of A1 and A2.
7. Bearings have been found locked at G1& G4 at P1 in span A1-P1. All bearings need
painting.
8. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged at A1, P1 and A2.
10.Crash barriers to be painted.
– 1 of the report. NDT results and core test show that the quality of concrete is poor in
abutments and girders. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed
combing, exposed reinforcement has been observed on the abutment walls. The surfaces
4.29.2.2Strengthening Measures for piers of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)
combing, exposed reinforcement has been observed on the piers. The surfaces to be

on the longitudinal girders. Girder G-4 in span P1-A2 is having wide cracks as well as
honeycombing. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
Volume-1.
at Ch-76+578(LHS)
(i) The damaged surfaces to be repaired up to 40mm depth by the polymer

(j) The localized Cracks and honeycombed, leaching surfaces to be pressure
4.29.2.5Strengthening of severe cracked Deck Slab of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)
During visual inspection severe cracks have been seen on the deck slab in span P2-A2. The
The portion of the severe cracked Deck slab to be replaced by the new one by
removing the affected area and proper treating the corroded reinforcement as detailed
in para 6.6. The self compacting concrete of M-60 grade has to be used for the severe
cracked deck slab portion.
4.29.2.6Bearings of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Bering locks below girders G1 &
G4 at P1 in span A1-P1 and wooden planks in bearing in at Pier P1 and abutment at A2 in
span P1-A2 to be removed. After removing corrosions Bearings have to be painted
properly.
4.29.2.7 Bearings Pedestal of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)

& 6.3 in Volume 1.
4.29.2.8 Expansion Joints of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Damaged all the three rubber seals have to be
4.29.2.9 Drainage Spouts of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)
It is observed that new drainage spouts are leaking. Around the drainage spouts repairing
to be done as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
4.29.2.10 Crash Barrier of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)
4.29.2.11Abutting ends of girde rs in minor bridge at Ch-76+578(LHS)
During inspection it is observed that Girders G4 in span P1-A1 and P1-A2 are pushing each
others at P1. Similarly girder G4 at abutment A1pushing the dirt wall.. There should be
clear gap to be maintained at the ends.

Photo 479: A vie w of s pan P1-A2of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578(RHS).
Photo 480: A vie w of s pan P1-A1of Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578(RHS).

Abutment A1 Pier P-1 Abutment A2
76+578(RHS).

Photo 483: Some drainage spouts blocked on Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (RHS)
Photo 484: New drainage spouts leaking on Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (RHS)
Photo 485: A Vie w of severe cracks on girde r G-1 in span A1-P1 of minor Bridge at Ch-76+578
(LHS)

Photo 486: A Vie w of cracks on girder G-1 in span P1-A2 of minor Bridge at Ch-76+578(RHS)
Photo 487: A Vie w of severe cracks between girder G1 -G2 in span P1-A2 on deck slab of
Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (RHS)
Photo 488: A Vie w of debris and wooden planks around bearings at abutme nt A-2 of Minor
Bridge at Ch-76+578 (RHS)

Photo 489: A vie w of left out shuttering on Minor Bridge at Ch-76+578 (RHS).
4.30.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage Ch-76+578 (RHS)
1. All the drainage spouts replaced by new one. However, concrete around drainage spout
needs repair.
3. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G1-G2 and G2-G3 in the span P1-A2 and
also in span A1-P1.
4. Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on all the girders. Girder G2 in span A1-P1 and G3
in span P1-A2 is honey combed and wide cracks.
5. Girders G1 in span P1-A1 and P1-A2 are pushing each others at P-1. Similarly girder G1 at
abutment A1pushing the dirt wall.
6. Abutment heads are having debris. Exposed reinforcement has been seen on Abutment head
of A1 and A2.
7. Bearings have been found locked below girder G-1 at pier P-1 in span P1-A1. Bearings getting
corroded.
– 1 of the report. NDT results and core test show that the quality of concrete is poor in
abutments, Piers, girders and deck slab. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report
described the detailed methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial
repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects observed on the element of
structure are detailed below:

4.30.2.2Strengthening Measures for pier of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(RHS)
Pier head to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey combing,
exposed reinforcement has been observed on the piers. The surfaces to be repaired as
follows:
on the longitudinal girders. Girders G-1 and G-2 in span A1-P1 and G-3 in span P1-A2 are
having wide cracks as well as honeycombing. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be
repaired as detailed below:
Volume-1.
at Ch-76+578(RHS)


G2 and G2-G3 in the span P1-A2 and also in span A1-P1. The following measures to be
adopted:
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Bering locks below girders G1 &
G4 at P1 in span A1-P1 and wooden planks in bearing in at Pier P1 and abutment at A2 in
span P1-A2 to be removed. After removing corrosions Bearings have to be painted
properly.
4.30.2.7 Bearings Pedestal of minor bridge at Ch-76+578(RHS)
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Damaged all the three rubber seals have to be
4.31 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage -77+862(LHS)

Photo 491: A vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-77+862(LHS).

77+862(LHS).

Photo 494(a) : Some drainage spouts blocked on Minor Bridge at Ch-77+862 (LHS)
Photo 494(b): Some drainage spouts leaking on Minor Bridge at Ch-77+862 (LHS)

Photo 495: A Vie w of severe cracks on deck slab between girders G2-G3 in span A1-P1 of
minor Bridge at Ch-77+862 (LHS)
Photo 496: A Vie w of severe cracks on deck slab between girders G2-G3 in span A1-P1 of
minor Bridge at Ch-77+862(LHS)

Photo 497: A Vie w of localize d cracks on deck slab between girder G1-G2 in span A1-P1 of
minor Bridge at Ch-77+862 (LHS)
Photo 498: A Vie w of locked bearings at A-1, P-1 and A2 of minor Bridge at Ch-77+862(LHS)

Photo 499 : A view of Flexure and Shear Cracks observed on the girder of minor bridge at Ch.-
77+862 LHS.
Photo 500 : A view of Flexure and Shear Cracks observed on the girder of minor bridge at Ch.-
77+862 LHS.

Photo 501 : A view of girder system on deck slab of minor bridge at Ch.-77+862 LHS.
Photo 502: A view of Pier P-1 of minor bridge at Ch.-77+862 LHS.
4.31.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage Ch-77+862 (LHS)

1. All the drainage spouts replaced by new one. However, concrete around some of the
2. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G2-G3 in the span P1-A1 and localized
cracks between G1-G2 also in the span A1-P1.
4. Abutment heads are having debris. Exposed reinforcement has been seen on Abutment head
of A1 and A2.
5. Bearings have been found locked at G4on P1,A1 & A2 in span P1-A1 and P1-A2. Bearings
getting corroded.
6. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged at A-1.
8. Crass barriers to be painted.
of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful in abutments, and
Piers. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed methodology for the
strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthe ning measures to be adopted for the
combing, exposed reinforcement has been observed on the abutment walls. The surfaces to
be repaired as follows:
4.31.2.2Strengthening Measures for pier of minor bridge at Ch-77+862(LHS)
Pier head have to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey combing,
exposed reinforcement has been observed on the piers. The surfaces to be repaired as
follows:
Shear and Flexure Cracks and honey combed surfaces have been observed at many locations
on all the girders. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:

Volume-1.
at Ch-77+862(LHS)

mortar as detailed in the Para 6.1 and beyond 40mm depth by the po lymer
(d) The localized Cracks and honeycombed, leaching surfaces to be pressure
G3 in the span P1-A1. The following measures to be adopted:
Near around all the bearings cleaning to be done properly. Bering locks below girders G1
at P1 in span A1-P1 to be removed. After removing corrosions Bearings have to be painted
properly.
The damaged, honeycombed and cracked bearing pedestal to be repaired as detailed in Para
6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.

expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Damaged rubber seal at Abutment A-1 have to
be replaced by new one.
It is observed that some of the new drainage spouts are leaking. Around the drainage
spouts repairing to be done as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the structure. Corroded and damaged hand rails
of the crash barriers required painting/replacement by new one.
4.32 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Minor Bridge at Chainage -78+224(LHS)

78+224(LHS).

Photo 506: A view of drainage spouts on Minor Bridge at Ch-78+224(LHS).
Photo 507: A Vie w of honeycombing on girder of minor Bridge at 78+224(LHS).
Photo 508: A Vie w of damaged bearing pedestal below girder G-3 of Minor Bridge at
78+224(LHS)

1. All the drainage spouts replaced. However, concrete around drainage spout needs
repairs.
2. Minor surface repair work carried out in the superstructure.
3. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab between girders G2-G3 in the span A1-A2.
5. Abutment heads are having debris. Exposed reinforceme nt has been seen on
Abutment heads.
7. Corroded Hand rails to be replaced/painted.
– 1 of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is doubtful to good in
abutments and girders. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed
on the girders. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as detailed below:
(a) The local damaged surfaces of girders and honeycombed area to be repaired at the
Volume-1.
at Ch-78+224(LHS)

in Para 6.3.
(b) The localized Cracks and honeycombed, leaching surfaces to be pressure grouting as
detailed in para 6.2.
G3 in the span A1-A2. The following measures to be adopted:
& 6.3 in Volume 1.
expansion joint have to be cleaned regularly. Damaged rubber seals have to be replaced by
new one.

Photo 509: A vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS).
Photo 510: A Longitudinal vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS).

Photo 511: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS).
Photo 512: A Vie w of damaged, honeycombed and color faded crash barrie rs & corroded
railings of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS).

Photo 513: Holes in the crash barrier are not provided for water flow from deck to footpath
as drainage spout were provide in footpath at Drainage spout on major bridge at
Ch-78+687 LHS
Photo 514: Exposed reinforce ment on Pier P-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS).

Photo 515: Exposed reinforce ment on Pier head of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS).
Photo 516: Severe leaching is observed in the deck slab in all the spans of Major Bridge at Ch-
78+687(LHS).
Photo 517: A Vie w of inspection through MBIU of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS).

Photo 518: A Vie w of span A1-P1 from inside the Box girder, showing Damaged on
Top slab
Photo 519(a): A View of span A1-P1 from inside the Box girder, showing cracks on web D/s of
the Box girde r.
Photo 519(b): A View of span A1-P1 from inside the Box girder, showing cracks and repaired
surface on webU/s of the Box girde r.

Photo 520: A Vie w from inside of the Box girder, showing cracks on webs of the Box girder in
P1-P2 span
Photo 521: A View from inside of the Box girder, showing cracks on Deck and webs of the Box
girde r in P2-P3 span

Photo 522: Vie w from inside of the Box girder, showing cracks, leaching and repaired deck slab
of the Box girder in P2-P3 span.

Photo 523: View from inside of the Box girder, showing cracks on top slab and webs of the Box
girder in P2-P3 span
Photo 524: View from inside of the Box girder, showing cracks on webs of the Box girder in P4-P5
span

Photo 525: A Vie w showing Bearings of the major bridge at Ch-78+687 RHS
Photo 526: A View showing locked BearingsB-1 at Pier P-5 in Span A2-P5 of the major Bridge

Photo 527: A Vie w showing exposed reinforcement and honeycombed surface on Major Bridge
at Ch-78+687 (LHS)
Photo 528: View showing leached concrete surface on soffit slab of the major bridge

Photo 529: Vie w showing Damaged cantilever deck slab of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687 (LHS)
1. Bearings have been found locked at many locations on the Abutments and Piers.
Some places bearings have been buried in to concrete. One of the bearing at
Abutment A-2 moved excessive. All bearings getting corroded.
2. Bearing pedestal cracked at P5 in span P5-A2.
spout needs repair.
4. Severe cracks and leaching seen in the deck slab and localized leaching/cracks also
seen in the deck slab in all the spans.
5. Flexure and Shear Cracks have been seen on all the box girders.
6. Abutment and Pier heads are having debris.
7. Exposed reinforcement has been seen on soffit slab, webs and deck slab in the box
girders.

9. Hand rails around the pier heads need painting.

11. Crash barriers require paintings.
4.33.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-78+687(LHS)
piers and deck slab. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed
as follows:
and
All the pier heads to be cleaned properly. At some locations local damages, honey
and
4.33.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Box Girde rs of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
many locations on all the box girders. The damaged and cracked surfaces to be repaired as
detailed below:
(b) Crack leaching on the girders to be repaired by pressure grouting as detailed in the
Para 6.2 in Volume-1.

(c) Severe cracked deck slab affected area to be re concreting as detailed in Para6.6.
(d) FRP to be used for strengthening of Deck Slab, Web, soffit slab and diaphragm wall
after pressure grouting as detailed in Para 6.7 and 6.8 in Volume 1 of Report.
(e) As per the condition of the box girder it is essential that external prestressing should
also be done as detailed in para 6.9 in Volume 1of Report.
4.33.2.4Bearings of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
locks have to be removed properly from all the locations. After removing corrosions
Bearings have to be painted properly. One of the bearing at A-2 require
replacement/resetting.
4.33.2.5 Bearings Pedestal of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
All the damaged, honeycombed and cracked bearing pedestal at Pier P-5 have to be repaired
as detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
4.33.2.6 Expansion Joints of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
one.
4.33.2.7 Drainage Spouts of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
As the drainage spouts are in the footpath area, there should be proper connection to be
provided through crass barriers. Drainage spouts required to be re-placed/repaired
properly by using polymer mortar/concrete as detailed in Para 6.1 and 6.3 in Vol. 1.
4.33.2.8 Crash Barrier of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
At some of the locations proper repairing work to be carried out; with polymer
mortar/concrete as explained in para 6.1 and 6.3. Painting of crash barrier is required for the
structure. Corroded hand rails of the crash barriers required painting/replacement by new
one.
4.33.2.9 Railing around Pier Heads of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
After removing the corrosion proper painting have to be done in railings around all the Pier
Head.
30 concrete.

Photo 531(a): A Longitudinal vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(RHS).

Photo 531(b): A Longitudinal vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(RHS).
Photo 532: A Vie w of Expansion joints of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(RHS).

Photo 533: A Vie w of damaged, honeycombed and color faded crash barrie rs & corroded
railings of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(RHS).
Photo 534: A vie w of cracks on box girder at Pier P-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(RHS).

Photo 535: A vie w of Inspection through MBIU of Major Bridge at Ch-78+687(RHS).
Photo 536: A vie w of cracks on webs of Box girder in span P4 -P5 of Major Bridge at Ch-
78+687(RHS).

Photo 537: A view from outside of the Box girder, showing construction joint on webs of the Box
girder major bridge at Ch.- 78+687RHS
Photo 538: A view from outside of the Box girder, showing repaired soffit slab in Span A1-P1 of the
Box girder of major bridge at Ch.- 78+687RHS

Photo 539: A view of leaking water mark from abutment expansion joint A-1 of the Box girder of
major bridge at Ch.- 78+687RHS
Photo 540: A view of locked bearings at pier P3 in the span P2-P3 of major bridge at Ch. 78+687(RHS)

Photo 541: A view of locked bearings and honeycombed pedestal at Pier P-3 in the span P3-P4
Photo 542: A view of locked bearings and honeycombed pedestal at Pier P-5 in the span P5-A2

Photo 543 : A View of severe leaching on the soffit of Box girder in the span A1-P1.
Photo 544 : View of severe leaching and cracks were observed in the top slab of Box girder in span P1-P2

Photo 545: A View of cracks on surface of the Webs of Box girder from inside in Span P4-P5.
Photo 546: View of cracks on surface of the Webs of Box girder in Span P5-A2

Photo 547 : A View of pier surface of the Pier P-1 of major bridge at 78+687 RHS
1. Bearings have been found locked almost at all the Abutments and Piers. Some
places bearings have been buried in to concrete. All bearings getting corroded.
spout needs repair.
3. Severe cracks seen in the deck slab and localized leaching/cracks also seen in the
deck slab in all the spans.
6. Exposed reinforcement has been seen on soffit slab, webs and deck slab in the box
girders.
– 1 of the report. NDT results show that the quality of concrete is poor in abutments piers
and deck slab. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the detailed

as follows:
and
and
4.34.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Box Girde rs of major bridge at Ch-78+687(LHS)
detailed below:
(a) The local damaged surfaces of box girder to be cleaned properly and repaired at the

All the damaged, honeycombed and cracked bearing pedestal have to be repaired as detailed
in Para 6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
one.
Leaking Drainage spouts required to be re-placed/repaired properly by using polymer

one.
4.34.2.9 Railing around Pier Heads of major bridge at Ch-78+687(RHS)
Head.
30 concrete.

Photo 551: A Longitudinal vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-89+661.

Photo 553: A Vie w color faded crash barriers & corroded railings of Major Bridge at Ch-
89+661(RHS).

Photo 554: A vie w of severe leaching on soffit of box girder in span Pier P3-P4 of Major Bridge
at Ch-89+661(RHS).
Photo 555: A vie w of Inspection through MBIU of Major Bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).

Photo 556: A view of transverse cracks on soffit of Box girder in span P3-P4 of Major Bridge at
Ch-89+661(RHS).
Photo 557: A vie w from inside of the Box girder, showing re paired deck slab of the Box girde rs
in span P1-P2 of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).

Photo 558: A vie w from inside of the Box girder, showing cracks on webs of the Box girders of
major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).

Photo 559: A view from inside of the Box girder, showing repaired deck slab in Span P2-P3 of the
Box girder of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).
Photo 560: A view of exposed reinforcement on downstream haunch in s pan P1 -P2 of the Box
girde r of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).

Photo 561: A view of exposed reinforce ment on diaphragm wall at pier P-2 of the Box girder of
major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).
Photo 562: A vie w of locked and corroded bearings at pier P3 in the span P2-P3 of major
bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).

Photo 563: A vie w of displaced and corroded bearing on major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).
Photo 564: A vie w of displaced and corroded bearing on major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).

Photo 565 : A typical vie w of severe leaching through pier head of major bridge at Ch-
89+661(RHS).
Photo 566:A view of severe leaching and cracks on the soffit slab of Box girder of major bridge
at Ch-89+661(RHS).

Photo 567: A Vie w of Box girder of Span A1-P1 of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).
4.35.1 General Observations on Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-89+661(RHS).
components of the structures are shown in Photos 550 to 567 in Para 4.35above. The
1. Bearings have been found locked at A2 and P3 and wooden block not removed at
P3.
2. Some places bearings had been buried in to concrete (A1 & A2). All bearings
getting corroded.
spout needs repair.
7. Exposed reinforcement and leaching have been seen on soffit slab, webs and deck
slab in the box girders.


14. Vegetation growth observed below the bridge.
4.35.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Major Bridge at Chainage Ch-89+661(RHS).
– 1 of the report. NDT results and core test result show that the quality of concrete is poor
in abutments piers and box girders. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described
the detailed methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial
repair/strengthening measures to be adopted for the defects observed on the element of
structure are detailed below:
4.35.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).
as follows:
and
4.35.2.2Strengthening Measures for piers of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).
and
4.35.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Box Girde rs of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).
Shear and Flexure Cracks, leaching and honey combed surfaces, exposed reinforcement has
been observed at many locations on all the box girders. The damaged and cracked surfaces
to be repaired as detailed below:

(d) FRP to be used for strengthening of Deck Slab, Web, soffit slab and diaphragm walls
of box girders after pressure grouting as detailed in Para 6.7 and 6.8 in Volume 1 of
Report.
All the damaged, honeycombed and cracked bearing pedestal have to be repaired as detailed
in Para 6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
one.
4.35.2.7 Drainage Spouts of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS).

one.
Head.
4.35.2.10 Apron around the piers of major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS)

30 concrete.
4.35.2.11 Vegetation growth below the major bridge at Ch-89+661(RHS)
Vegetation growth have to be removed from below and all around of the structure.
4.36 Inspection, Tests and remedial measures for the Major Bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS)
Photo 569(a): A Longitudinal vie w of Major Bridge at Ch-91+655.

Photo 569(b): A vie w of P9-A2 span of Major Bridge at Ch-91+655.
Photo 571: A Vie w of color faded crash barriers & corroded railings of Major Bridge at Ch-
91+655(RHS).

Photo 572: A vie w of drainage spouts on box girders of Major Bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).
Photo 573(a): A vie w of cracks on we b of box girde r in span P6-P7 of Major Bridge at Ch-
91+655(RHS).

Photo 573(b): A vie w of cracks on web of box girder in span P6-P7 of Major Bridge at Ch-
91+655(RHS).
Photo 573(c): A vie w of cracks on soffit of box girder in span P6-P7 of Major Bridge at Ch-
91+655(RHS).

Photo 574 : A vie w of leaching on cantilever deck slab of box girde r in span P4-P5 of Major
Bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).
Photo 575: A vie w of Inspection of soffit slab of box girder in span P2-P3 through MBIU of
Major Bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).
Photo 576: A view of strengthening of we b of box girder at Pier P-1 of Major Bridge at Ch-
91+655(RHS).

Photo 576: A view of cracks on deck slab of Box girders in span P3-P4, P8-P9 and P9-A2 of
Major Bridge at Ch- Ch-91+655(RHS).
Photo 577: An inside view of the Box girder of span P6-P7of major bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).
Photo 578: A vie w of locked bearing at pier P-2 of the Box girder of major bridge at Ch-
91+655(RHS).

Photo 579: A view of exposed reinforce ment of bearing pedestal and bearing lock in form of
reinforce ment at pier P-1 of major bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).
Photo 580: A vie w of various corroded bearings of major bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).

Photo 581: A vie w of various corroded bearings of major bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).
components of the structures are shown in Photos 568 to 581 in Para 4.36above. The
1. Bearings have been found locked at P1, P2 and P8.

2. Some places bearings had been buried in to concrete (P1 & P2).
3. All bearings getting corroded.
4. Some of the bearing pedestal cracked and some are having honeycombing.
5. All the drainage spouts replaced by new one. However, concrete around some
9. Exposed reinforcement and leaching have been seen on so ffit slab, webs and deck
slab in the box girders.
10. Expansion joins found full of dust and rubber seals damaged at some locations.
– 1 of the report. NDT results and core test result show that the quality of concrete is poor
in abutments piers and deck slab. The Para-6 in the Volume – 1 of the report described the
detailed methodology for the strengthening measures. The remedial repair/strengthening

measures to be adopted for the defects observed on the element of structure are detailed
below:
4.36.2.1Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of major bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS).
as follows:
and
combing, exposed reinforcement has been observed on the piers. The surfaces to be
and
4.36.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Box Girde rs of major bridge at Ch-91+655(RHS)
detailed below:

All the damaged, honeycombed and cracked bearing pedestals have to be repaired as
detailed in Para 6.2 and 6.1 & 6.3 in Volume 1.
one.

one.
Head.
30 concrete.
5.0 REHABILITATION STRATEGIES
The detailed Visual Inspection and tests on the major bridge leads to repair, rehabilitation
and strengthening measures as detailed in Para-4 above. The executing agency should
prepare detailed working drawings and execution methodology for each work to be
executed and implement only after approval of the Engineer- in-Charge.

The broad technical specifications and methodologies are given in Para-6 in Volume-1. The
rehabilitation & strengthening measures suggested in the report is based on visual
examinations accompanied with series of tests, distress mapping etc. Accordingly, damages
were assessed and remedial measures of structural members are suggested. It is suggested
that these measures should be preferably taken up after adopting proper support,
barricading the area along with safety measures including stoppage of traffic/diversion of
traffic. The scaffolding etc must be provided properly. The load transferring mechanism of
temporary support system must be ensured. The rehabilitation/strengthening measures shall
be taken up as per technical specifications detailed in Para-6 in Volume-1 of the Report,
IRC specifications and good repair and rehabilitation practices. The methodology
suggested in Para-6 in volume 1 of the report can be changed by the suitable alternate
proposal and to be adopted only after vetting by the CRRI, New Delhi/reputed
organizations.
Before start of repair/strengthening measures the traffic should be diverted properly and
well-designed support system to be erected.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Almost all the components of the major bridge have been inspected through Mobile Bridge
Inspection Unit (MBIU) and ladders; and the required site investigations carried out. It is
worthwhile to mention herewith that the structures are constructed in the year 2006-08 which
is about 15 year old only. However, substantial premature failure observed in the many
bridges against the designed life of structures of 100 years. As per the actual condition of the
various components of the structures the required remedial measures suggested as detailed in
Para- 4. There is an urgent need to avoid accidents due to punching shear of deck slab to be
taken up at the earliest in priority basis as detailed in Para -4 above. The project report
comprises of the following two volumes:


Part-II : Major and minor Bridges on Severe Distressed condition
For the repair/rehabilitation/retrofitting of individual major and minor bridges the Volume-
2: Detailed Report on Condition and remedial measures of Structures may kindly be
referred as detailed above. Based on the rehabilitation/strengthening measures suggested on
the report the concessionaire should submit detailed methodology for each and individual
bridges for vetting of the CRRI and thereafter, the work of rehabilitation may be started at
the site.
6.1 General Suggestions for Implementation

(a) The experienced agency having at least 5year of experience in the area of
strengthening /rehabilitation/repairing of bridges and executed at least one work of
50% value of the requisite capacity should be selected. The proposed technical
proposal (methodology and designed strengthening measures) by the executing
agency to be vetted by CRRI/a reputed organization before implementation.
(b) It is suggested that during the implementation of strengthening works of structures
random visit of CRRI is desirable to ensure the compliance of the proper repair
methodology.
(c) It is also suggested that the important bridges have to be load tested and randomly
checked through NDT after the execution of rehabilitation measures.
(d) General cleaning of both the approaches and below the structure shall be carried out
and all the undesired materials shall be removed from pier and abutment heads.
(e) Traffic should be diverted properly with all safety measures during the strengthening
works of structures.
(f) Routine inspection at an interval of six months (Before and after Monsoon) and
detailed inspection of the structures to be done after every three years.
(g) After repair/rehabilitation/retrofitting of structure phase-II random checking on some
of the representative structures to be carried o ut through NDT, Core Test and Load
Test to check the efficacy of the strengthening measures.
REFERENCES
1. BS: 1881 (Part-120), 1970. “British standard code of methods for determination of
compressive strength of Concrete”, British Standard Institute, London.

2. BS: 1881 (Part-203), 1970. “British standard code of recommendations for

measurement of ultrasonic pulses in concrete”, British Standard Institute, London.
3. Bungey J.H., Stephen G. Millard & Michael G. Granthan (2006), “Testing
4. Christina Stergiopoulou (2006), “Evaluation of concrete infrastructure quality using
laboratory and on-site testing”, MS Thesis, Graduate School of the University of
Maryland, USA.
5. Concrete Society, Diagnosis of Deterioration in Concrete Structures, Concrete Society
Report No. 54, 2000, pp. 60-64.
6. Galan. A. (1990). “Combined ultrasonic methods of concrete testing”, Elsevier,
Amsterdam.
7. IRC: SP: 69-2011 “Guidelines Specifications for Expansion Joints, (first revision),
Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi.
8. IRC: SP: 69-2011 “Guidelines Specifications for Expansion Joints, (first revision),
Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, 2013.
9. IRC-6, 2014, “Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges: section-II
Loads and stresses”, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi.
10. IS: 13311, Part-2, 1992. “Non-destructive testing of concrete - Methods of tests -
Rebound hammer”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
11. IS:516, Part-4, 2018, “Hardened Concrete-Methods of Test - Sampling, Preparing and
Testing of Concrete Cores”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
12. IS:516-1956, “Indian standard code of methods of tests for strength of concrete”,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
13. Malhotra, V.M. – Testing hardened concrete, Non-destructive methods, Monograph 9,
American, Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1976.
14. Specifications for road and bridge works, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways,
(fifth revision) published by Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, 2013.
15. IRC: SP-40 2019- Guidelines on Techniques for Strengthening and Rehabilitation of
Concrete Bridges
16. ACI: 562 2019 –Code Requirements for Assessment, Repair and Rehabilitation of
Existing Concrete Structures
17. BS EN:1504 2017- Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete
structures

Volume 2 Part II Final SSP 4675

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Volume 2 Part II Final SSP 4675

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report No.

Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section

Porbandar Tollway Pvt. Limited

Bridge Engineering & Structures

Director Dr. Ranjana Aggarwal

Head of the Division Dr. Rajeev Goel

This report entitled, “Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section

Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section on NH-8A from Km

Inspection of structures of 4–Laning of Porbandar-Jetpur section on NH-

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 1

Volume-2: Detailed Report on Condition and remedial measures of Structures

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 2

3.0 DETAILS PROVIDED BY CLIENT

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 3

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 4

T-B eam Open

T-B eam O pen

T-B eam Ope n

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 5

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 6

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 7

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 8

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 9

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 10

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 11

4.0 VISUAL INSPECTION OF DISTRESSED STRUCTURES AND REHABILITATION

Volume-2: Detailed Report on Condition and remedial measures of Structures

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 12

Photo 1: A vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-18+432(LHS)

Photo 2: A vie w of inspection and testing of Minor Bridge at Ch-18+432(LHS)

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 13

(Abutment A1) Abutment (A2)

Photo 4: A vie w of debris accumulated on the Abutme nt head at A1(LHS).

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 14

Photo 6: Cracks observed on the Girder of minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS)

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 15

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 16

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 17

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 18

Photo 13: A view of drainage spout of minor bridge at chainage 18+432(LHS).

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 19

4.1.1 General Observations on Minor Bridge at Chainage 18+432(LHS)

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 20

(e) Both the abutment heads are having debris.

(g) Vegetation growth observed all around the structure.

(h) Cleaning of bearing and it’s painting required.

4.1.2 Suggestions for rehabilitation of the Minor Bridge at Chainage 18+432(LHS)

4.1.2.1 Strengthening Measures for Abutment Walls of structures

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 21

4.1.2.3 Repair/Strengthening of Diaphragm Walls/Cross Beams of structures

4.1.2.4 Strengthening of localized leaching/cracked Deck Slab of structures

4.1.2.5 Strengthening of severe cracked Deck Slab of structures

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 22

4.1.2.6 Expansion Joints on Structure

4.1.2.8 Crash Barrier

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 23

Photo 17: A Vie w of Minor Bridge at Ch-19+010 (LHS).

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 24

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 25

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 26

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 27

Central Road Research Institute is an ISO 9001 Institute Page 28