Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gooptu EconomicLiberalisationWork 2007
Gooptu EconomicLiberalisationWork 2007
Kolkata
Author(s): Nandini Gooptu
Source: Economic and Political Weekly , May 26 - Jun. 1, 2007, Vol. 42, No. 21 (May 26 -
Jun. 1, 2007), pp. 1922-1933
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
NANDINI GOOPTU
conomic reforms in India since the 1980s have brought only for economic opportunities, but also as an arena of political
about significant changes in the organisation of work,action, often in rejection of interventionist states.1 Economic
labour markets, employment relations and workplace reforms are also understood to energise civil society organisations
and thus, ultimately boost political pluralism and dynamise
practices, as well as a re-evaluation of the social worth, public
status and discursive meanings of various forms of workdemocracy
and [Bratton 1989, Bratton and van de Walle 1992]. The
labour. As is well known, the legitimacy of labour rightsbeneficial
and links between market liberalisation and political lib-
of working class political activism has yielded to the perceived
eralism constitute the analytical crux of these accounts. Other
compulsion to augment efficiency, international competitivenessinterpretations, however, are less positive. In Africa, for instance,
and private investment. Technology and business now dominate the adverse economic consequences of structural adjustment in
the 1980s, often implemented by authoritarian governments,
public imagination as the sources of both individual social mobility
and national economic growth. The economic importance of
undermined the post-colonial "social contract" with the state, led
manual and industrial work has been devalued, and the role of
to "popular departicipation in the political process", and elicited
political protests [Olukoshi (ed) 1998: pp 20-21, 28; Gibbon,
labour has also been undermined as a constituency in democratic,
Bangura and Ofstad (ed) 1992]. From a range of different, and
party politics or as a major presence in left wing politics. These
not necessarily converging, perspectives, it has been suggested
normative shifts have implications for work, not only in the small
that "casualisation", rapid turnover of jobs, unemployment,
and shrinking "formal" or "organised" sector, but also in the wider
economy. As the experience and meanings of work change under declining living standards, and downward social and economic
globalisation, so do social consciousness and political subjec-mobility of the labouring poor, compounded by urban social and
tivity of workers, variously affecting relations of community, spatial polarisation, retreat of the state, lack of state protection,
class, gender and generation; political and social norms; ideasgrowing physical insecurity and lawlessness have variously led
about difference and hierarchy; conceptions of the state, democ-
to the decline of class-based action, fragmented the working class,
racy and citizenship. Changing notions of work, social percep- fuelled ethnic or religious tensions and identity politics, generated
tions and political attitudes and practices, in turn, have apolitical
far- unrest and protest, and turned urban areas into sites of
reaching impact on wider political processes, which formspoliticalthe instability, conflict, vigilantism, crime, drug trafficking,
subject of this paper, with a focus on the labouring poor in andareasviolence, even civil wars.2 Despite differences in interpre-
of industrial decline. tation, the analytical accent in these various discussions is on
A voluminous literature on developing countries has drawn the experience of marginalisation, vulnerability and insecurity
attention to the diverse political consequences of globalisationin determining political outcomes. On a somewhat less pessi-
mistic note, particularly for Latin America, while it is acknowl-
and economic reforms. On the positive side, freeing of the market
and the curtailment of state regulations are believed to have given
edged that economic restructuring has intensified both material
an impetus to self-employment, micro-enterprise and market- deprivation and social exclusion, and stimulated crime as a form
based institutions, and thus strengthened the informal sector, of
notentrepreneurship, yet at the same time, it is argued, collective