Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Display PDF

    Uploaded by

    Ashutosh samir
    5 views1 page
    The petitioner, Adil Rashid, approached the High Court of Jharkhand for grant of regular bail in connection with a case registered under sections 376(2)(n) of IPC and sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act. The petitioner's counsel argued that there is no suppression of facts and innocence has been claimed. It was further argued that the victim is around 18 years of age and the petitioner and victim were good friends with a long relationship. Considering that the charge was framed in August 2023 but no witnesses have been examined till date and the statement of the victim recorded under section 164, the court was inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    display_pdf (15)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner, Adil Rashid, approached the High Court of Jharkhand for grant of regular bail in connection with a case registered under sections 376(2)(n) of IPC and sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act. The petitioner's counsel argued that there is no suppression of facts and innocence has been claimed. It was further argued that the victim is around 18 years of age and the petitioner and victim were good friends with a long relationship. Considering that the charge was framed in August 2023 but no witnesses have been examined till date and the statement of the victim recorded under section 164, the court was inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    5 views1 page

    Display PDF

    Uploaded by

    Ashutosh samir
    The petitioner, Adil Rashid, approached the High Court of Jharkhand for grant of regular bail in connection with a case registered under sections 376(2)(n) of IPC and sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act. The petitioner's counsel argued that there is no suppression of facts and innocence has been claimed. It was further argued that the victim is around 18 years of age and the petitioner and victim were good friends with a long relationship. Considering that the charge was framed in August 2023 but no witnesses have been examined till date and the statement of the victim recorded under section 164, the court was inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

    B. A. No. 10958 of 2023


    ....
    Adil Rashid .… Petitioner
    Versus
    The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
    ....
    CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

    For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.


    For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P.
    ....
    04/23.02.2024
    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
    2. The applicant who is in custody since 04.05.2023 has approached this Court
    for grant of regular bail in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.177 of 2023,
    corresponding to POCSO Case No.86 of 2023, registered for the offence under Section
    376(2)(n) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, pending in the court of
    learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-IV-cum-Spl. Judge, POCSO, Ranchi.
    3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete
    set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and
    there is no suppression on his/her part.
    4. Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
    participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that
    both were good friends and there was long relationship between them. It has been
    further submitted that the victim girl is around the age of 18 years. On above basis
    prayer for bail has been made.
    5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
    6. From perusal of record, it appears that the charge has been framed on
    10.08.2023 but till date not a single witness has been examined.
    7. Considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.,
    I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named
    above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten
    thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
    Addl. Judicial Commissioner-IV-cum-Spl. Judge, POCSO, Ranchi in connection with
    Argora P.S. Case No.177 of 2023, corresponding to POCSO Case No.86 of 2023,
    subject to condition that the applicant will submit self-attested copy of his Aadhaar
    Card and also give his mobile number before the learned court below which he will not
    change during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

    (Rajesh Kumar, J.)


    Shahid/

    You might also like