Fires and Explosions

1/61
The Fire Triangle
 Fuels:
 Oxidizers – Liquids
– Liquids  gasoline, acetone,
– Gases ether, pentane
 Oxygen, – Solids
fluorine, chlorine
 plastics, wood dust,
 hydrogen fibers, metal
peroxide, nitric
acid, perchloric particles
acid – Gases
– Solids  acetylene, propane,
 Metal peroxides, carbon monoxide,
ammonium hydrogen
nitrate  Ignition sources
 Sparks, flames, static
electricity, heat
2/61
Fires and Explosions
 Definitions
 Flammability
– Flash Point
– Flammability limits
– Mixtures
– Temperature Dependence
– Pressure Dependence
 Minimum Oxygen Concentration
 Minimum Ignition Energy
 Adiabatic Compression
 Ignition Sources
Definitions
 Combustion – a chemical reaction in
which a substance combines with an
oxidizer and releases energy.
 Explosion – rapid expansion of gases
resulting in a rapid moving pressure or
shock wave.
 Mechanical Explosion – due to failure
of vessel with high pressure non
reactive gas.
Explosions
 Detonation – explosion (chemical reaction)
with shock wave greater than speed of
sound
 Deflagration – explosion (chemical reaction)
with shock wave less than speed of sound
 BLEVE – Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor
Explosion – when liquid is at a temperature
above its atmospheric boiling point. Vessel
ruptures – flammable liquid flashes and
results in a fire/explosion
Explosions
 Confined explosion – an explosion
occurring within a vessel or a building.
Usually results in injury to the building
inhabitants and extensive damage.
 Unconfined explosion – an explosion
occurring in the open. Usually results
from spill of a flammable gas spill.
These explosions are rarer than
confined since dilution occurs.
Explosions
 Dust Explosions - This explosion
results from the rapid combustion of
fine solid particles. Many solid
materials become very flammable
when reduced to a fine powder.
Flammability
 Flash Point (FP) – a property of material
used to determine the fire and explosive
hazard. The lowest temperature of a
liquid at which it gives off enough vapor
to form an ignitable mixture with air.
 Needs to be determined experimentally.
– Different methods to determine, open cup
and closed cup. Open cup is usually a few
degrees higher.
National Fire Protection Association
Flammability classification
 Flammable IA – Flash point < 73°F,
boiling point < 100 °F
 Flammable IB – Flash point < 73°F,
boiling point > 100 °F
 Flammable IC – 73°F < Flash point <
100 °F
 Combustible II – 100 °F < Flash point <
140 °F
 Combustible IIIA – 140 °F < Flash point
< 200 °F
 Combustible IIIB – Flash point > 200 °F
Flammability Relationships

10/61
Mixture Flash Points
– Flash Points of mixtures can be
estimated only IF one of the components
is flammable. If more than one is
flammable then need to determine
experimentally.
– For mixtures:
 Determine the temperature at which the
vapor pressure of the flammable in the liquid
is equal to the pure component vapor
pressure at its flash point.
Mixture Flash Points
 Example
– Methanol FP=54°F, Vapor Pressure @ 54°F is 62 mmHg
Determine the flash point of a solution that is 75wt%
MeOH in water.
Solution:
Since only one component is flammable, can estimate
mixture FP:
Mixture Flash Point Example
Continued
Raoult's Law
P  xP sat
P 62mmHg
P  
sat
 98.4mmHg
x 0.63
Now need the temperature that corresponds
to this P sat . Use Antoine's equation (Append II)

ln  P   A 
sat B
C T
T in Kelvin, P sat in mmHg
Mixture Flash Point Example
Continued
Rearrange
B
T sat
C
A - ln P
From Appendix II
A is 18.5875
B is 3626.55
C is -34.29
3626.55
T  34.29  293.36 K
18.5875  ln  98.4 
T  20.21C  68.4 F
Flammability Limits
 There is usually a
range of compositions
of a flammable vapor
and air where
combustion occurs.
 Too little fuel (lean
mixture) not enough
fuel to burn.
 Too much fuel (rich
mixture) not enough
oxygen to burn
Flammability Limits
 Table 6-1 gives upper flammability
limits and lower flammability limits for
several common substances.
 Experimentally determined.
 LFL can be estimated from Flash
Point:.
vapor pressure at flash point
LFL 
760 mmHg
Determine vapor pressure using Antoine Equation
Mixture Flammability
Limits
 Ifyou have a mixture of flammable
components you can calculate Lower
Flammability Limit of the mixture
LFLmix using Le1Chatelier’s
LFLmix  n
relationship: yi
 LFL
i 1 i

LFLi is flammability limit for component i

yi is mole fraction of i on combustible basis
n is the number of combustible species
Mixture Flammability
Limits
 You can also calculate an Upper
Flammability Limit of the mixture UFLmix
using Le Chatelier’s relationship:
1
UFLmix  n
yi

i 1 UFLi
Flammability Limits – Temperature
effect
 Table 6-1 gives flammability limits for
25°C and atmospheric pressure. If
you are at a different temperature you
can modify flammability limits
LFLT  LFL25 1  0.75(T  25) / H c 
UFLT  UFL25 1  0.75(T  25) / H c 
H c is heat of combustion for component
T is in C
Flammability Limits – Pressure
effects
 LFL is not affected by pressure
 UFL does depend on the pressure

UFLP  UFL  20.6(log10 P  1)

P is in MPa absolute
 Procedure
– Correct for Temperature
– Correct for Pressure
– Calculate for mixture
Fires and Explosions
 Definitions
 Flammability
– Flash Points
– Flammability limits
– Mixtures
– Temperature Dependence
– Pressure Dependence
 Minimum Oxygen Concentration
 Minimum Ignition Energy
 Adiabatic Compression
 Ignition Sources
Minimum Oxygen
Concentration (MOC)
 LFL is based on “air” but actually it is
O2 that is important. Often in industry
they “inert” to dilute the O2
concentration.
 Below the MOC the reaction cannot
generate enough energy to heat the
entire mixture to the extent required for
self propagation.
Flash Point From Vapor
Pressure
 Most materials start to burn at 50% stoichiometric
 For heptane:
– C7H16 + 11 O2 = 7 CO2 + 8 H2O
– Air = 11/ 0.21 = 52.38 moles air /mole of
C7H16 at stoichiometric conditions
– At 50% stoichiometric, C7H16 vol. % @ 0.9%
– Experimental is 1.1%
– For 1 vol. %, vapor pressure is 1 kPa
temperature = 23o F
– Experimental flash point temperature = 25o F
23/61
Flammability LOC
Limiting O2
Concentration:
Vol. % O2 below
Diagram which combustion
can’t occur
1 Atmosphere
25°C

FLAMMABLE
HEL
MIXTURES

LEL

24/61
Flammability LOC
Limiting O2
Concentration:
Vol. % O2 below
Diagram which combustion
can’t occur
1 Atmosphere
25°C

HEL

FLAMMABLE
MIXTURES

LEL

25/61
Flammable Limits Change
With:

Inerts

Temperature

Pressure

26/61
Effect of Temperature on
Lower Limits of Flammability

L
E
L,
%

27/61
Effect of Pressure of
Flammability
Natural Gas, volume%

HEL

Natural Gas In Air at 28oC

LEL

Initial Pressure, Atm.

28/61
Minimum Ignition Energy
 Lowest amount of energy required
for ignition
– Major variable
– Dependent on:
 Temperature
% of combustible in combustant
 Type of compound

29/61
Minimum Ignition Energy

Effects of Stoichiometry

30/61
Autoignition Temperature
 Temperature at which the vapor ignites
spontaneously from the energy of the
environment

 Function of:
– Concentration of the vapor
– Material in contact
– Size of the containment

31/61
Flammability Relationships
CONCENTRATION OF FUEL

AUTO
IGNITION
MIST
FLAMMABLE
FLAMMABLE REGION
REGION

TEMPERATURE AIT
FLASH POINT AIT
32/61
Autoignition Temperature
Material Variation Autoignition
Temperature
Pentane in air 1.50% 1018 °F
3.75% 936 °F
7.65% 889 °F
Benzene Iron flask 1252 °F
Quartz flask 1060 °F
Carbon disulfide 200 ml flask 248 °F
1000 ml flask 230 °F
10000 ml flask 205 °F
33/61
Autoignition Temperature

34/61
Auto-Oxidation
 The process of slow oxidation with accompanying
evolution of heat, sometimes leading to autoignition if
the energy is not removed from the system

 Liquids with relatively low volatility are particularly

susceptible to this problem

 Liquids with high volatility are less susceptible to

autoignition because they self-cool as a result of
evaporation

 Known as spontaneous combustion when a fire

results; e.g., oily rags in warm rooms; land fill fires
35/61
Adiabatic Compression
 Fuel and air will ignite if the vapors are
compressed to an adiabatic temperature
that exceeds the autoignition temperature

 Adiabatic Compression Ignition (ACI)

 Diesel engines operate on this principle;

pre-ignition knocking in gasoline engines

 E.g.,flammable vapors sucked into

compressors; aluminum portable oxygen
system fires
36/61
Ignition Sources of Major Fires
Source Percent of Accidents
Electrical 23
Smoking 18
Friction 10
Overheated Materials 8
Hot Surfaces 7
Burner Flames 7
…
Cutting, Welding, Mech. Sparks 6
…
Static Sparks 1
All Other 20 37/61
More Definitions
 Fire
– A slow form of deflagration

 Deflagration
– Propagating reactions in which the energy transfer
from the reaction zone to the unreacted zone is
accomplished thru ordinary transport processes
such as heat and mass transfer.

 Detonation / Explosion
– Propagating reactions in which energy is transferred
from the reaction zone to the unreacted zone on a
reactive shock wave. The velocity of the shock
wave always exceeds sonic velocity in the reactant.
38/61
Classification of Explosions
Rapid Equilibration of High Pressure
EXPLOSION = Gas via Shock Wave

Physical Explosions Chemical Explosions

Uniform Reactions Propagating Reactions

Thermal Detonations Deflagrations

Explosions (Shock Wave) (Normal
Transport)

39/61
Potential Energy

Stored Volumes of Ideal Gas at 20° C

PRESSURE, psig TNT EQUIV., lbs. per ft3

10 0.001
100 0.02
1000 1.42
10000 6.53

TNT equivalent = 5 x 105 calories/lbm

40/61
Deflagration
 Combustion with flame speeds at non-
turbulent velocities of 0.5 - 1 m/sec.
 Pressures rise by heat balance in fixed
volume with pressure ratio of about 10.
CH4 + 2 O2 = CO2 + 2 H2O + 21000 BTU/lb
Initial Mols = 1 + 2/.21 = 10.52
Final Mols = 1 + 2 + 2(0.79/0.21) = 10.52
Initial Temp = 298oK
Final Temp = 2500oK
Pressure Ratio = 9.7
Initial Pressure = 1 bar (abs)
Final Pressure = 9.7 bar (abs)
41/61
Detonation

 Highly turbulent combustion

 Very high flame speeds
 Extremely high pressures >>10 bars

42/61
Pressure vs Time
Characteristics
DETONATION
OVERPRESSURE

VAPOR CLOUD DEFLAGRATION

TIME

43/61
CONSEQUENCES

44/61
Bayway, NJ
H-Oil Incident 1970

45/61
46/61
47/61
48/61
Two Special Cases
 Vapor Cloud Explosion

 Boiling
Liquid /Expanding Vapor
Explosion

49/61
 U V C E
N A L X
C P O P
O O U L
N R D O
F S
I I
N O
E N
D S

 An overpressure caused when a gas cloud

detonates or deflagrates in open air rather than
simply burns.

50/61
What Happens to a Vapor Cloud?
 Cloud will spread from too rich, through flammable
range to too lean.

 Edges start to burn through deflagration (steady state

combustion).

 Cloud will disperse through natural convection.

 Flame velocity will increase with containment and

turbulence.

 If velocity is high enough cloud will detonate.

 If cloud is small enough with little confinement it cannot

explode.
51/61
What Favors Hi Overpressures?
 Confinement  Large Vapor Clouds
– Prevents escape, – Higher probability of
increases turbulence finding ignition source;
more likely to generate
 Cloud composition overpressure
– Unsaturated molecules
– ‘all ethylene clouds  Source
explode’; low ignition
energies; high flame – Flashing liquids; high
speeds pressures; large, low or
downward facing leaks
 Good weather
– Stable atmospheres,
low wind speeds
52/61
Impact of VCEs on People
Peak Equivalent
Overpressure Wind Velocity Effects
psi mph
1 Knock personnel down
2 70
5 160 Rupture eardrums
10 290
15 Damage lungs
20 470
30 670
35 Threshold fatalities
50 940 50% fatalities
65 99% fatalities
53/61
Impact of VCEs on Facilities
Peak
Overpressure Typical Damage
psi
0.5-to-1 Glass windows break
1-to-2 Common siding types fail:
- corrugated asbestos shatters
- corrugated steel panel joints fail
- wood siding blows in
2-to-3 Unreinforced concrete, cinder block walls fail
3-to-4 Self-framed steel panel buildings collapse
Oil storage tanks rupture
5 Utility poles snap
7 Loaded rail cars overturn
7-8 Unreinforced brick walls fail

54/61
Vapor Clouds and TNT
 World of explosives is dominated by TNT impact
which is understood.
 Vapor clouds, by analysis of incidents, seem to
respond like TNT if we can determine the
equivalent TNT.
 1 pound of TNT has a LHV of 1890 BTU/lb.
 1 pound of hydrocarbon has a LHV of about 19000
BTU/lb.
 A vapor cloud with a 10% efficiency will respond
like a similar weight of TNT.
55/61
Multi-Energy Models
 Experts plotted efficiency against vapor cloud
size and … reached no effective conclusions.
Efficiencies were between 0.1% and 50%
 Recent developments in science suggest too
many unknowns for simple TNT model.
 Key variables to overpressure effect are:
– Quantity of combustant in explosion
– Congestion/confinement for escape of combustion
products
– Number of serial explosions
 Multi-energy model is consistent with models
and pilot explosions. 56/61
 B L E V E
O I X A X
I Q P P P
L U A O L
I I N R O
N D D S
G I I
N O
G N
S

 The result of a vessel failure in a fire and

release of a pressurized liquid rapidly into
the fire
 A pressure wave, a fire ball, vessel
fragments and burning liquid droplets are
usually the result 57/61
BLEVE

FUEL
SOURCE

58/61
BLEVE Video Clip

59/61
Distance Comparison
INVENTORY UVCE BLEVE FIRE
(tons)
1 120 18 Distance
2 150 36 in Meters
5 200 60
10 250 90 20
20 310 130 30
50 420 200 36
100 530 280 50
200 670 400 60
500 900 600 100
1000 1150 820 130
60/61
DESIGN for PREVENTION

61/61
Eliminate Ignition Sources
 Fire or Flames
– Furnaces and Boilers
– Flares
– Welding
– Sparks from Tools
– Spread from Other Areas jkdj – Sewer Design, Diking,
dkdjfdk dkdfjdkkd jkfdkd fkd
fjkd fjdkkf djkfdkf jkdkf dkf
– Matches and Lighters
 Typical Control
– Spacing and Layout
– Spacing and Layout
– Work Procedures
– Work Procedures
Weed Control,
Housekeeping
– Procedures
62/61
Eliminate Ignition Sources
 Hot Surfaces  Typical Control
– Hot Pipes and Equipment – Spacing
– Automotive Equipment – Procedures

 Electrical  Typical Control

– Sparks from Switches
– Static Sparks jkfdkd fjkdjd
kdjfdkd
– Lightning
– Handheld Electrical
Equipment
– Area Classification
– Grounding, Inerting,
Relaxation
– Geometry, Snuffing
– Procedures

63/61
Inerting – Vacuum Purging
 Most common procedure for inerting
reactors
 Steps
1. Draw a vacuum
2. Relieve the vacuum with an inert gas
3. Repeat Steps 1 and 2 until the desired oxidant
level is reached
 Oxidant Concentration after j cycles:

PL j
y  yo( ) where PL is vacuum level
j PH PH is inert pressure
64/61
Inerting – Pressure Purging
 Most common procedure for inerting
reactors
 Steps
1. Add inert gas under pressure
2. Vent down to atmospheric pressure
3. Repeat Steps 1 and 2 until the desired oxidant
level is reached
 Oxidant Concentration after j cycles:

nL j
y  yo(n ) where nL is atmospheric moles
j H nH is pressure moles
65/61
Vacuum? Pressure? Which?
 Pressure purging is faster because
pressure differentials are greater (+PP)

 Vacuum purging uses less inert gas than

pressure purging (+VP)

 Combining the two gains benefits of both

especially if the initial cycle is a vacuum
cycle (+ VP&PP)

66/61
Other Methods of Inerting
 Sweep-Through Purging
– ‘In one end, and out the other’
– For equipment not rated for pressure, vacuum
– Requires large quantities of inert gas
 Siphon Purging
– Fill vessel with a compatible liquid
– Use Sweep-Through on small vapor space
– Add inert purge gas as vessel is drained
– Very efficient for large storage vessels

67/61
Using the
Flammability
Diagram
1 Atmos.
25°C

FLAMMABLE
MIXTURES

68/61
Static Electricity
 Sparks resulting from static charge buildup
(involving at least one poor conductor) and sudden
discharge
 Household Example: walking across a rug and
grabbing a door knob
 Industrial Example: Pumping nonconductive liquid
through a pipe then subsequent grounding of the
container

Dangerous energy near flammable vapors 0.1 mJ

Static buildup by walking across carpet 20 mJ

69/61
Double-Layer Charging
 Streaming Current
– The flow of electricity produced by transferring
electrons from one surface to another by a
flowing fluid or solid
– The larger the pipe / the faster the flow, the
larger the current

 Relaxation Time
– The time for a charge to dissipate by leakage
– The lower the conductivity / the higher the
dielectric constant, the longer the time

70/61
Controlling
Static Electricity
 Reduce rate of charge generation
– Reduce flow rates

 Increase the rate of charge relaxation

– Relaxation tanks after filters, enlarged section of
pipe before entering tanks

 Use bonding and grounding to prevent

discharge
71/61
Controlling
Static Electricity
GROUNDING

BONDING 72/61
Static Electricity – Real Life

73/61
Explosion Proof Equipment
 Allelectrical devices are inherent ignition
sources

 Ifflammable materials might be present at

times in an area, it is designated XP
(Explosion Proof Required)

 Explosion-proof housing (or intrinsically-safe

equipment) is required

74/61
Area Classification
Class I Flammable gases/vapors present
 National
Electrical Class II Combustible dusts present
Code (NEC) Class III Combustible dusts present but
defines area not likely in suspension
classifications Group A Acetylene
as a function Group B Hydrogen, ethylene
of the nature Group C CO, H2S
and degree of
Group D Butane, ethane
process
hazards Division 1 Flammable concentrations
normally present
present
Division 2 Flammable materials are
normally in closed systems
75/61
VENTILATION
 Open-Air Plants
– Average wind velocities are often high enough to
safely dilute volatile chemical leaks

 Plants Inside Buildings

– Local ventilation
 Purge boxes
 ‘Elephant trunks’

– Dilution ventilation (1 ft3/min/ft2 of floor area)

 When many small points of possible leaks exist

76/61
Summary
 Though they can often be reduced in
magnitude or even sometimes
designed out, many of the hazards
that can lead to fires/explosions are
unavoidable
 Eliminating at least one side of the
Fire Triangle represents the best
chance for avoiding fires and
explosions
77/61
END of PRESENTATION

78/61