2017PA066331

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 95

Myocardial infarction and sudden death : a

population-based approach
Nicole Karam

To cite this version:


Nicole Karam. Myocardial infarction and sudden death : a population-based approach. Santé publique
et épidémiologie. Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 2017. English. �NNT : 2017PA066331�.
�tel-01726269�

HAL Id: tel-01726269


https://theses.hal.science/tel-01726269
Submitted on 8 Mar 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est


archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés.
THESE DE DOCTORAT DE
L’UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE

ECOLE DOCTORALE PIERRE LOUIS DE SANTE PUBLIQUE A PARIS

EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET SCIENCES DE L'INFORMATION BIOMEDICALE

EPIDÉMIOLOGIE CLINIQUE

Infarctus du Myocarde et Mort Subite:

Approche en Population

Présentée par

Mlle Nicole KARAM

Le 03 Novembre 2017

Pour obtenir le grade de

DOCTEUR de l’UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE

Membres du Jury :

Directeur et Co-directeur de Thèse : M. Xavier JOUVEN et M. Christian SPAULDING

Rapporteurs : M. Jean BOUYER et Mme Julinda MEHILLI

Examinateur : M. Jean-Philippe COLLET et Mme Vijay KUNADIAN

1
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my sincere gratitude Pr Xavier Jouven who supported me throughout

my career ever since I began working in Georges Pompidou, and who introduced me to

research and gave me the opportunity to join his amazing research team.

To Pr Christian Spaulding for his unfailing support, and for all his priceless help, advice and

encouragements whether in the research, technical, or career level.

To Pr Albert Hagege for giving me the opportunity to carry out my doctoral research in his

department and for pushing me forward in my career development

To Pr Eloi Marijon for the extended discussions and valuable suggestions which have

contributed greatly to the improvement of the thesis and of my research in general.

To Pr Jean-Philippe Empana, Muriel Tafflet, Marie-Cécile Périer and Lucile Offredo for their

valuable assistance, expert suggestions and reviews. This thesis could not have been

accomplished without your help.

To the members of the jury for the time they granted for the PhD defense, with a particular

thanks to Pr Julinda Mehilli for giving me the opportunity to regularly visit her catheterization

laboratory in Munich and for providing me a great example of success and modesty.

To the e-MUST team, especially Drs Sophie Bataille and Yves Lambert for granting me

access to their wonderful registry without which this work would not have been possible.

Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family and friends for their encouragement

and support throughout this thesis and in my life in general.

2
Publications Arising from the Thesis

Published:
Karam N, Marijon E, Dumas F, Offredo L, Beganton F, Bougouin W, Jost D, Lamhaut L,
Empana JP, Cariou A, Spaulding C, Jouven X, for the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center.
Characteristics and Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Sudden Cardiac Arrest According to the
Time of Occurrence. Resuscitation 2017;116:16-21

Karam N, Bataille S, Marijon E, Giovanetti O, Tafflet M, Savary D, Benamer H, Caussin C,


Garot P, Juliard JM, Pires V, Boche T, Dupas F, Lebail G, Lamhaut L, Laborne FX,
Lapostolle F, Spaulding C, Empana JP, Jouven X, Lambert Y; e-MUST study Investigators.
Sudden Cardiac Arrest Complicating Myocardial Infarction in the Field: Incidence,
Characteristics and Outcomes. Circulation 2016.134(25):2074-2083

Under Review:
Karam N, Bataille S, Marijon E, Tafflet M, Savary D, Benamer H, Caussin C, Garot P,
Juliard JM, Pires V, Boche T, Dupas F, Lebail G, Lamhaut L, Laborne FX, Lefort H,
Mapouata MB, Lapostolle F, Spaulding C, Empana JP, Lambert Y, Jouven X. Prognosis and
Outcome Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Complicating Myocardial Infarction Prior to
Hospital Admission: The e-MUST Study. Submitted in August 2017

Upcoming submissions:
Karam N, Bataille S, Marijon E, Tafflet M, Savary D, Benamer H, Garot P, Juliard JM, Pires
V, Boche T, Dupas F, Le Bail G, Lamhaut L, Laborne FX, Lefort H, Lapostolle F, Empana
JP, Spaulding C, Lambert Y, Jouven X. Study of Incidence, Temporal Variations and
Associated Factors

Published articles, related but not in the strict framework of the PhD thesis
Karam N, Narayanan K, Bougouin W; Benameur N, Beganton F, Jost D, Lamhaut L, Perier
MC, Cariou A, Celermajer D, Marijon E, Jouven X. Major Regional Differences in
Automated External Defibrillator Placement and Basic Life Support Training Exposure in
France: Further Needs for Coordinated Implementation. Resuscitation 2017

3
Posters and Oral Presentations
Karam N, Pechmajou L, Dumas F, Bougouin W, Beganton F, Cariou A, Spaulding C,
Marijon E, Jouven X. Coronary Findings in Sports-Related Compared to Non Sports-Related
Sudden Cardiac Arrest. Advances in Science presentation, ESC 2017

Karam N, Spaulding C, Cariou A, Marijon E, Jouven X. Opening a new front in the fight
against sudden cardiac death: is it time for near-term prevention?. Rapid Fire Abstract
presentation, ESC 2017

Karam N, Pechmajou L, Bougouin W, Dumas F, Empana JP, Cariou A, Spaulding C, Jouven


X, Marijon E. Management and Outcomes of Sports-Related Cardiac Arrest in Young Adults.
Poster presentation, AHA 2016

Karam N, Bougouin W, Perier MC, Lamhaut L, Dumas F, Benameur N, Celermajer D,


Marijon E, Jouven X. Major Disparities in Public Access Defibrillation Programs
Implementation: a French Nationwide Study. Poster presentation, ESC 2016

Karam N, Tafflet M, Bataille S, Marijon E, Empana JP, Spaulding C, Lambert Y, Jouven X.


Risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest According to the Month of STEMI Occurrence: the e-MUST
Study. Poster presentation, AHA 2015

Karam N, Bataille S, Tafflet M, Marijon E, Empana JP, Lambert Y, Spaulding C, Jouven X.


Risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest According to the Time of STEMI Occurrence: the e-MUST
Study. Poster presentation, AHA 2015

Karam N, Marijon E, Offredo L, Beganton F, Lamhaut L, Dumas F, Spaulding C, Cariou A,


Jouven X. Management and outcomes of out of hospital cardiac arrest according to its time of
occurrence: results from the Paris SDEC study. Rapid Fire Abstract presentation, ESC 2015

Karam N, Marijon E, Beganton F, Lamhaut L, Dumas F, Cariou A, Spaulding C, Jouven X.


Initial prognosis and management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in women: the SDEC Paris
study. Poster presentation, ESC 2015

Karam N, Bataille S, Tafflet M, Marijon E, Lapostolle F, Spaulding C, Lambert Y, Jouven X.


Who presents sudden cardiac arrest before hospital admission at the acute phase of STEMI?
The e-MUST study. Poster presentation, ESC 2015

4
Abstract

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a major issue of public health with more than 40,000 cases

every year in France with a persistent poor prognosis. A great overlap exists between SCA

and coronary artery disease. On one hand, coronary artery disease accounts for the vast

majority (≥75%) of SCA. On the other hand, due to major in-hospital care improvement, out-

of-hospital SCA has become the main cause of death in the setting of ST-elevation

myocardial infarction (STEMI). Improving the prognosis of both entities starts with a better

understanding of the associations and the overlap between the two.

STEMIs occurring during off-hours (nights, weekends, and holidays) have a worse

prognosis compared to those occurring during working hours. Whether the same impact is

observed on SCA has not been documented yet. The first part of the thesis therefore assessed

the impact of time of occurrence on the prognosis of SCA. Using data from the Sudden Death

Expertise Centre that includes all SCA occurring in Paris and its suburbs, we compared SCA

outcome according to the time of occurrence. We observed a 30% higher mortality rate during

off-hours, mainly due to differences in the very early initial management provided by

witnesses (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillation), while EMS

and in-hospital management was not influenced by the time of occurrence. Accordingly, it

becomes clear that efforts should focus on improving this early SCA management.

The second part of the thesis therefore aimed on identifying, among STEMI patients,

those at high risk of pre-hospital SCA, in order to plan SCA management immediately before

it occurs, allowing a better initial resuscitation. Using data from the e-MUST registry that

includes all STEMI managed by the EMS in the Greater Paris area, we identified 5 simple

predictors of pre-hospital SCA that are systematically assessed by dispatchers on the phone

when called for a chest pain: younger age, absence of obesity, absence of diabetes mellitus,

5
shortness of breath, and a short delay between pain onset and call to emergency medical

services. Using those variables, we built an SCA prediction score that we than validated

internally on one third of the population, and externally on a STEMI population from another

French region.

The first minutes of SCA management are the main determinants of its prognosis and

should ideally be planned before SCA occurrence. Prediction of imminent SCA in STEMI,

the main cause of SCA, is feasible with a simple phone-obtainable score, which would allow

anticipation of SCA occurrence by the EMS services and adjusting STEMI management

accordingly. Even though the generalizability of this strategy to other causes of SCA remains

to be demonstrated, a promising path for decreasing SCA burden can be foreseen with the

development of a new strategy based on SCA near-term prevention to ensure optimal initial

resuscitation, planned before SCA occurrence.

6
Résumé
La mort subite constitue un problème majeur de santé publique avec plus de 40 000 cas par an

en France et un pronostic qui reste sombre. La mort subite et la maladie coronaire sont

étroitement liées. D'une part, la vaste majorité des morts subites sont d'origine coronaire

(≥75% des cas). D'autre part, avec les progrès dans la prise en charge hospitalière de

l'infarctus du myocarde (IDM), la mort subite est devenue le principal mode de décès des

IDM. L’amélioration du pronostic de ces deux entités doit donc passer par une meilleure

analyse des points communs et des relations existant entre mort subite et IDM.

Les IDM survenant durant les heures non ouvrables (fin de semaine, jours fériés,

nuits) ont une mortalité accrue. Cette relation n’a pas été étudiée en détail dans la mort subite.

La première partie de la thèse s'est donc focalisée sur le pronostic des morts subites selon

leurs horaires de survenue. Dans le registre francilien du Centre d'Expertise Mort Subite qui

collecte l'ensemble des morts subites survenant à Paris et Petite Couronne, nous avons

comparé les caractéristiques et le pronostic des morts subites selon leur horaire de survenue.

Nous avons constaté que les morts subites en dehors des heures ouvrables ont une mortalité

plus élevée (jusqu’à 30%), en raison essentiellement d'une prise en charge initiale moins

optimale par le témoin en termes de massage cardiaque et de défibrillation externe, alors que

les prises en charge spécialisées pré- et intra-hospitalière ne semblent pas être influencées par

l'horaire de survenue. Ainsi, il devient clair que dans l'avenir, les efforts devraient se focaliser

sur l'amélioration de la prise en charge très précoce de la mort subite afin d'obtenir

l'amélioration manquante du pronostic de la mort subite.

La deuxième partie de la thèse a donc eu pour objectif d'identifier, parmi les victimes

d'IDM, celles à risque de présenter une mort subite pré-hospitalière, afin de planifier la prise

en charge de l'arrêt cardiaque juste avant sa survenue en vue d'une meilleure réanimation

initiale. A partir du registre e-MUST qui inclue tous les IDM pris en charge par le SAMU en

7
Ile-de-France, nous avons identifié 5 facteurs associés à un risque accru de mort subite pré-

hospitalière (âge jeune, absence de diabète et d'obésité, dyspnée, délai court entre le début de

douleur et l'appel des secours). Nous avons ainsi créé un score de risque de mort subite que

nous avons validé en interne (tiers de la population) et en externe (population similaire en

Haute-Savoie).

Les premières minutes de la prise en charge d'une mort subite sont les principaux

déterminants de son pronostic et devraient idéalement être planifiées avant sa survenue. La

prédiction de la mort subite parmi les victimes d'IDM, la cause principale de mort subite, est

faisable grâce à un score facile à obtenir au téléphone, permettant aux services de secours

d'anticiper la survenue de la mort subite et de planifier la prise en charge en fonction. Quoique

la possibilité de généralisation de cette stratégie à d'autres causes de mort subite reste à

démontrer ; cependant, elle semble être intéressante pour diminuer la mortalité de la mort

subite grâce au développement de la prévention à court terme avec organisation de la prise en

charge des morts subites avant leur survenue.

8
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………...……2

Publications arising from this Thesis…………………………………………………...….3

Posters and Oral Presentations……………………………………….………………….…4

Abstract in English………………………………………………………………………..…5

Abstract in French……………………………………………….……………………..……7

Table of Contents……………………………………………….……………………………9

List of Abbreviations and Acronyms……………….………….………………...………..11

List of Figures………………..………………………………….………………………..…12

1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....13

1.1. Definitions of SCA………………………………………………………………...…14

1.2. Incidence and Demographics of SCA…….………………...……………………….14

1.3. Cardiovascular Conditions Associated to SCA Occurrence.....…………………...15

1.3.1. Coronary Artery Disease………………………….……………………………..17

1.3.1.1. Acute Coronary Events……………………………………………………...18

1.3.1.2. Chronic Coronary Artery Disease………………………………………..…21

1.3.2. Non-Ischemic Cardiac Etiologies………………………………………………..22

1.3.2.1. Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathies……………………………………………22

1.3.2.2. Other Structural Cardiac Causes of SCA………………………………….23

1.3.2.3. Non-Structural Cardiomyopathies………………………………………….24

1.4. Prognosis of SCA………..………………………………………………………...…25

2. Chapter 1………..……………………………...……………………………………...…28

2.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..28

2.2. Article………………………………………………...……….………………………29

3. Chapter 2……………………………………………………….………………………...35

9
3.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….35

3.2. Article………………………………………………………….……………………..36

4. Discussion………………………………………………………………………………...52

4.1. Strategies to Reduce SCA Burden…………………………………..……………...52

4.1.1. Resuscitation Strategy……………………………..…………………...………..52

4.1.1. Prevention Strategy……………………………..………………….......………..55

4.2. Burden of STEMI-Related SCA……………………………………..…….………..56

4.3. Predictors of Pre-Hospital STEMI-Related SCA…...…………………….………..57

4.4. Strength and Limitations…………………….…..…...…………………….………..58

5. Conclusion………………………..…...……………………...………………….………..61

6. Perspectives…………………………………………………………………….……….…62

7. References…………………………………………………………………………..……..64

8. Appendix (French summary) …………………………………………………………....82

10
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms

AED: Automated External Defibrillator

APEX-AMI: Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction

CAD: Coronary Artery Disease

CPR: CardioPlumonary Resuscitation

EKG: Electrocardiogram

EMS: Emergency Medical Service

GUSTO: Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded

Coronary Arteries

e-MUST: Evaluation en Médecine d’Urgence des Stratégies Thérapeutiques des infarctus du

myocarde

MVP: Mitral Valve Prolapse

PAMI: Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction

SCA: Sudden Cardiac Arrest

SCD: Sudden Cardiac Arrest

SDEC: Sudden Death Expertise Center

STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

VF: Ventricular Fibrillation

11
List of Figures

Figure 1: Structural Heart Disease in SCA Survivors

Figure 2: Pathogenesis of Coronary Artery Disease

Figure 3: Trends in Out-of-Hospital and In-Hospital Mortality Within 28 Days of Acute Coronary

Event per 100 000 Population Aged 35 to 84 Years Between 1991 and 2006

Figure 4: ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting

with ST-segment Elevation

Figure 5: The Chain of Survival

Figure 6: Revised Chain of Survival

12
1. Introduction

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a major issue of public health with more than 350.000 deaths

per year in the United States, accounting for almost half of cardiovascular mortality.(1)

Despite huge investments that have allowed some increase in survival rates,(2)(3) outcomes

remain poor with an overall survival to hospital discharge of less than 10%.(4)

A major overlap exists between Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and SCA. On one

hand, CAD, and in particular ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), accounts for most

cases of SCA. On the other hand, overall mortality related to STEMI has decreased drastically

during the last decades, mainly due to a major reduction in in-hospital mortality.(5) Pre-

hospital death by SCA has therefore become the main cause of death from STEMI. This close

association between SCA and STEMI leads to a close interaction between their prognosis, and

therefore, improving the prognosis of both entities has to start with a better understanding of

the overlap and the associations between the two.

Using data from two prospective registries, the SDEC (Sudden Death Expertise

Center) registry that includes all SCAs occurring in Paris and its suburbs since 2011, and the

e-MUST (Evaluation en Médecine d’Urgence des Stratégies Thérapeutiques des infarctus du

myocarde) registry that includes all STEMIs occurring in the Greater Paris Area since 2003,

we assessed in the first part of the thesis, the major determinants of the prognosis of SCA

through an analysis of the impact of the time of occurrence on the mortality rate. In the

second part of the thesis, we identified the characteristics associated with a higher risk of pre-

hospital SCA during STEMI and created a risk score for SCA that could help emergency

medical services anticipate the occurrence of SCA and plan the patients’ management

accordingly.

13
1.1. Definitions of SCA

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) refers to an unexpected death from a cardiovascular cause in a

person with or without preexisting heart disease.(6) Therefore, extracardiac conditions need to

be excluded before the diagnosis of SCD can be confirmed, and death should not have

occurred in the setting of a prior terminal condition, such as a malignancy that is not in

remission or end-stage chronic obstructive lung disease. An “established SCD” is an

unexpected death without obvious extracardiac cause, occurring with a rapid witnessed

collapse, or if unwitnessed, occurring within 1 hour after the onset of symptoms. A “probable

SCD” is an unexpected death without obvious extracardiac cause that occurred within the

previous 24 hours.

The term Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) should be used to describe SCD cases in

which specific resuscitation records are available or the individual has survived the cardiac

arrest event.(7) Since most of the studies are rather based on SCA cases, the term SCA will be

used in the thesis for homogeneity reasons.

1.2. Incidence and Demographics of SCA

Estimates regarding the annual incidence of SCA vary widely depending on the

employed definitions, the data sources for case ascertainment, and the methods used to assess

the rates. The majority of global comparisons are based upon rates of emergency medical

service (EMS) attended out of hospital SCA, which appear to be much lower in Asia (52.5 per

100,000 person-years) as compared to Europe (86.4 per 100,000 person-years), North

America (98.1 per 100,000 person-years), and Australia (111.9 per 100,000 person-years).

There also appear to be regional variations within geographic regions. For instance, among 10

regions in North America, rates of EMS attended cardiac arrest range from 159 per 100,000

person-years in Dallas, Texas to 71.8 per 100,000 person-years in Ottawa, Ontario.(8)

14
Overall, the global rate of SCA seems to range from 50 to 100 per 100 000 in the general

population.(6)

Regardless of the method used for the rate estimation, it is well documented that the

incidence of SCA increases markedly with age, mainly due to an increase in the rate of CAD

in older age. For example, the annual incidence for 50-year-old men is 100 per 100 000

population compared with 800 per 100 000 for 75-year-old men.(9) Median age of SCA

occurrence is higher among women than among men (71 years vs. 66 years, respectively).

SCA is much less frequent among women group in any age group, and even after adjustment

for CAD risk factors and other predisposing conditions.(10) Accordingly, the SCA rate is

estimated to range from 1.40 per 100 000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95,

1.98] in women to 6.68 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 6.24, 7.14) in men.(11) However,

this difference seems to be decreasing over the last three decades, mainly due to a greater

reduction in the incidence of SCA among men than among women (10% vs. 43%,

respectively), particularly in the younger population.(12) (13)(14) This evolution might be

explained by the increasing prevalence of CAD among women while it has been decreasing

among men.(15)

1.3. Cardiovascular Conditions Associated to SCA Occurrence

Approximately 50% of cardiac arrests occur in individuals without a known heart disease, but

most suffer from concealed ischemic heart disease.(16) Epidemiologic data indicate that CAD

is the most common cause of SCA in adults over age 35, particularly among men where it is

responsible for approximately 75–80% of SCAs. In women, the percentage of SCA due to

CAD is lower, but still accounts for around 45% of SCAs (Figure 1).(17)(6)(18)(19)

15
Figure 1: Structural Heart Disease in SCA Survivors. These pie charts depict the
proportions of underlying cardiac disease among men and women who survive SCA.
CAD was the main diagnosis in the majority of men. In contrast, women had more
nonischemic heart disease than men, including dilated cardiomyopathy (19%) and
valvular heart disease (13%). CAD indicates coronary artery disease; DCM, dilated
cardiomyopathy; VHD, valvular heart disease; Spasm, coronary vasospasm; and RV,
right ventricular (Adapted from Albert et al, Circulation 1996)

Dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies account for the second largest number of

sudden deaths from cardiac causes. Other cardiac disorders, such as valvular or congenital

heart diseases, acquired infiltrative disorders, primary electrophysiological disorders, and the

known genetically determined ion channel abnormalities, account for only a small proportion

of SCA in the general population.(20) Finally, unexplained SD, also called sudden

arrhythmic death syndrome, in which a significant cardiac abnormality is not found after

clinical evaluation in SCA survivors or at autopsy in SCA victims, accounts for less than 5%

of cases.(21)(22) This percentage appears to be higher in women, where structurally normal

hearts are more commonly encountered.(23)(17) In Asians, the primary ion channelopathies

are estimated to be responsible for 10% of SCA.(24) In young adults and children less than

age 35, CAD accounts for a much smaller proportion of deaths, with hypertrophic

16
cardiomyopathy, coronary artery anomalies, myocarditis, arrhythmogenic right ventricular

cardiomyopathy, and primary ion channelopathies accounting for significant proportions.(25)

1.3.1. Coronary Artery Disease

CAD accounts for most cases of SCA. In survivors of SCA, CAD with vessels exhibiting

more than 75% cross-sectional stenosis are found in 40% to 86% of patients, depending on

the age and sex of the studied population.(26) (20)

There are three general settings where SCD occurs in patients with CAD: (1) during an

acute coronary event, particularly STEMI, (2) provoked by coronary ischemia due to

significant coronary stenosis but in the absence of acute coronary event, (Figure 2) and (3) in

the presence of myocardial structural alterations (fibrosis, scar, left ventricular dilatation) due

to prior myocardial infarction or chronic ischemia.

Figure 2: Pathogenesis of Coronary Artery Disease. Stable atherosclerotic


plaques are usually responsible of stable angina. They can still lead to SCA in
case of increased oxygen demand that cannot met by a similar increase in blood
flow due to the coronary narrowing. Plaque rupture leads to thrombus formation
with partial or complete coronary obstruction, responsible of acute coronary
syndromes complicated in some cases by SCA. MI: Myocardial Infarction

17
1.3.1.1. Acute Coronary Events

Acute coronary syndromes, including STEMI, account for a great proportion of SCA. The

prevalence of acute coronary thrombus or active coronary lesion in autopsy series of SCD

varies depending on autopsy protocol and histological techniques, and ranges from 19 to

74%.(27)(28)(29)

Through an analysis of acute coronary syndromes mortality in Sweden between 1991

and 2006, Dudas et al confirmed general trends suggesting that both incidence and mortality

of acute coronary syndromes dramatically decreased over time (Figure 3). However, they also

emphasized that this global result hides great disparities regarding the timing of death

occurrence. Indeed, despite a decrease of 50% in in-hospital mortality, out-of-hospital

mortality only decreased by 15%. Accordingly, nowadays, 80% of deaths due to CAD occur

outside the hospital, through SCA.(5)

Figure 3: Trends in Out-of-Hospital and In-Hospital Mortality Within 28 Days of


Acute Coronary Event per 100 000 Population Aged 35 to 84 years between 1991
and 2006 (Dudas et al, Circulation 2011)

18
STEMI is a clinical syndrome defined by characteristic symptoms of myocardial

ischemia in association with persistent ST elevation on the electrocardiogram (EKG) and

subsequent release of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis.(30) Diagnosis of ST elevation in the

absence of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle-branch block is defined by the European

Society of Cardiology/ACCF/AHA/World Heart Federation Task Force for the Universal

Definition of Myocardial Infarction as new ST elevation at the J point in at least 2 contiguous

leads of ≥2 mm (0.2 mV) in men or ≥1.5 mm (0.15 mV) in women in leads V2–V3 and/or of

≥1 mm (0.1 mV) in other contiguous chest leads or the limb leads.(31) New or presumably

new left bundle-branch block has been considered a STEMI equivalent. However, in most

cases of left bundle-branch block at time of presentation, prior EKG is not available for

comparison and it is not possible to confirm whether it previously existed, which complicates

the diagnosis of STEMI in this situation.(32)

Given the pathophysiology of STEMI that is related to acute coronary occlusion,

prompt reperfusion, either by fibrinolysis or by percutaneous coronary intervention, is the

cornerstone in the management of STEMI. Guidelines from the American Heart

Association/American College of Cardiology and from the European Society of Cardiology

favor revascularization by primary percutaneous coronary intervention over fibrinolysis if it

can be performed in a timely manner (Figure 3).(30)(33) The development of reperfusion

strategies have drastically improved the course and prognosis of STEMI.

19
Figure 4: ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction
in Patients Presenting with ST-segment Elevation. PCI: Percutaneous Coronary
Intervention; EMS: Emergency Medical Service; FMC: First Medical Contact

Ventricular arrhythmias are relatively frequent during STEMI, whether before or after

hospital arrival, and SCA is the main mode of death in STEMI. Ventricular tachycardia

degenerates first to VF, following an increase in the ventricular tachycardia rate and QRS

width, and later to asystole.(20)(34) The most common hypothesis for a VF mechanism in the

acute phase of STEMI is electrolyte and autonomic imbalances, low pH, and reentry. Reentry

is caused by inhomogeneity and instability of electrical conduction, and it appears to be the

major pathophysiological cascade responsible for VF.(18) The highest estimates of the

incidence of ventricular arrhythmias due to STEMI were reported in studies on the use of

thrombolytic therapy in STEMI. In the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue

Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-1) trial, which included

40,895 STEMI patients, the overall incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in this trial was

10.2%.(35) Reports from high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention centers indicate

20
that 4% to 11% of patients with STEMI who undergo coronary angiography are brought to

cardiac catheterization after being resuscitated from out-of-hospital SCA.(36)(37) However,

these percentages do not really represent the incidence of pre-hospital SCA during STEMI

since patients who died before hospital admission, and those who did not undergo coronary

angiography were not taken into account.

Data on the short-term and long-term prognosis of VF during STEMI in the era of

PPCI are limited and inconsistent.(38)(39)(40) Furthermore, caution should be taken when

interpreting their results, since patients who died before hospital admission were

systematically excluded from the studies. The mortality rate and the impact of early SCA on

STEMI prognosis were therefore underestimated. While retrospective analyses of the Primary

Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial suggested no increase in in-hospital

mortality or one-year mortality,(39) retrospective analyses of the Assessment of Pexelizumab

in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) trial, showed an increased 90-day mortality

rate.(37) In line with the APEX-AMI trial results, observational case-control studies

suggested an increase in in-hospital mortality for VF patients with STEMI but no increase in

the long-term mortality rate for these patients compared with STEMI patients without

VF.(40)(41) Considering these conflicting data, the current guidelines for the secondary

prevention of sudden arrhythmic death in patients who survived a VF event do not

recommend early treatment with ICD.(42)

1.3.1.2. Chronic Coronary Artery Disease

In most series, stable plaques and/or chronic changes alone are found in ~50% of SCD

victims with CHD on autopsy.(28)(43)(44) In these cases, a mismatch between myocardial

oxygen demand such as during exercise, and supply in the setting of severe significant

coronary lesion, induces a myocardial ischemia which triggers ventricular arrhythmias.

21
Interestingly, chronic ischemia may exert a protective effect by causing the

development of coronary collaterals that can help mitigate the extent of ischemia produced by

sudden coronary occlusion. Therefore, an acute occlusion of a minimally narrowed coronary

artery can result in a more disastrous outcome than occlusion of a severely narrowed coronary

artery with the jeopardized myocardium protected by collaterals.

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction and severity of heart failure symptoms are

currently the strongest predictors of SCA risk among patients with prior STEMI and/or

chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.(45) After STEMI, mortality risk increases gradually until

the left ventricular ejection fraction declines to 40%, and then exponentially increases as it

decreases further.(46) SCA rates reach 10% over a median follow-up of approximately 2

years among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below 30% and chronic heart

failure in clinical trials.(47)

1.3.2. Non-Ischemic Cardiac Etiologies

Non-ischemic cardiac causes of SCA include non-CAD related cardiomyopathies, other

structural cardiac diseases, and non-structural cardiac diseases.

1.3.2.1. Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathies

Non-CAD related cardiomyopathies account for 10 to 15% of causes of SCA. The three major

etiologically-distinct cardiomyopathies are non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy,

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Dilated cardiomyopathies, most often idiopathic, and characterized by cardiac cavities

dilation and ventricular dysfunction, are the most common types of cardiomyopathies causing

SCA. Ventricular arrhythmias are present in most patients with dilated cardiomyopathies, and

SCA is common in this population.(48)(49)(50) The presence and severity of ventricular

22
arrhythmias increase along with the severity of the disease, but their value to predict SCA is

unclear.(51)(52) Indeed, identification of increased risk of SCA in dilated cardiomyopathy

patients has been notoriously difficult, and the only consistent and independent association

has been reported with the severity of left ventricular dysfunction reflected by the left

ventricular ejection fraction.(16)

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is defined by the presence of increased left ventricular

wall thickness that is not solely explained by abnormal loading conditions. Its prevalence

ranges between 0.02–0.23% in adults. While HCM is most frequently transmitted as an

autosomal-dominant trait, most studies report a small male preponderance (53) The annual

rate of SCA is between 0.5 – 2% in contemporary series, and SCD from a lethal ventricular

arrhythmia remains one of the common modes of death.(54) (55) SCA is more likely to occur

in young patients (<30 years) and is uncommon in older patients (>60 years).(55)

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a genetically determined heart

muscle disorder characterized by fibrofatty replacement of the right ventricular myocardium

(and of the left ventricle with disease progression).(56) According to clinical studies and data

from pre-participation screening for sport activity, the estimated prevalence of the disease in

the general population ranges from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 5000.(57) Ventricular fibrillation is the

mechanism of SCA in previously asymptomatic young people and athletes, while it becomes

rare in older patients, who rather have scar-related, hemodynamically stable ventricular

tachycardia.(58)

1.3.2.2. Other Structural Cardiac Causes of SCA

Valvular heart disease is reported to be the cause of death in 1% to 5% of the SCA cases.

Among them, mitral valve prolapse (MVP), the most common cardiac valvular disorder (2.4 –

6% of the population) has been well investigated in SCA, with controversial conclusions

23
regarding the association between MVP and SCA.(59)(60) MVP is characterized by an

expansion, thickening and ballooning of one or both leaflets of the mitral valve with a systolic

displacement into the left atrium. It has been suggested that MVP could potentially accounts

for a greater proportion of SCA among young subjects. Basso and colleagues evaluated 200

cases of SCA in the young (≤ 35 years) and reported that MVP was observed in 10% of

cases.(61) Autopsy series described several cases of SCA where MVP was the sole

abnormality documented,(60) and a “malignant” form of MVP has been identified with a

predisposition for SCA. All this data lends further support to the hypothesis that there may be

a small but definite risk of SCA associated with MVP. Aortic stenosis is another valvular

disease associated to SCA, particularly among symptomatic patients. Among asymptomatic

patients with severe AS, the annual rate of SCA ranges between 1 and 3 % prior to valve

replacement, and recent observational data suggest that this risk may be lowered by early

surgery.(62)(63)(64)

Medical and surgical breakthroughs in the care of children born with heart defects

have resulted in a striking improvement in survival, particularly in the younger age strata and

in those with severe forms of congenital heart disease. Consequently, most children now

survive to adulthood, leading to a shift in population demographics with adults making up

two-thirds of the entire congenital heart disease population.(65) In this context, SCA is a

leading cause of mortality, occurring in otherwise relatively stable patients, typically in the

third or fourth decade of life and accounting for around 25% of the total mortality.(66)

1.3.2.3. Non-Structural Cardiomyopathies

Approximately 5 to 10% of SCA occur in patients with a structurally normal but electrically

abnormal heart in the context of inherited arrhythmic disorders.(67)

24
Congenital long QT (LQT) syndrome is a hereditary disorder, characterized by

delayed myocardial repolarization, resulting in prolongation of the QT interval on EKG and

predisposition to torsade de pointes which can result in SCA.(68) The estimated incidence of

SCA before the age of 40 in untreated patients is varies between 0.30% and 0.60% per year,

according to the type of LQT syndrome.(69) Most arrhythmic events occur during exercise or

emotional stress in LQT1, at rest or with sudden noises in LQT2, and at rest or during sleep in

LQT3.

Brugada syndrome is a primary electrical disorder affecting middle-aged males with

their first arrhythmic event typically developing during sleep at a mean age of 40 years.(70)

The clinical phenotype is 8 to 10 times more prevalent in men than in women. The incidence

of the cardiac events (SCA, ventricular fibrillation, and/or appropriate ICD shocks) in type I

Brugada syndrome ranged from 7.7–10.2% per year, 0.6–3.0% per year, and 0.5–0.8% per

year in those with a history of aborted SCD due to VF, syncopal episodes, and no symptoms,

respectively.(71)(72)

1.4. Prognosis of SCA

Despite major advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and post-resuscitation care, survival

to hospital discharge after SCA remains poor.(73)(74) Overall survival to hospital discharge is

less than 10% in most cities.(75) SCA survival is strongly related to the presenting underlying

rhythm and the setting in which the event occurs. SCA with shockable rhythms (ventricular

tachycardia or fibrillation) that account for approximately 25% of cases, have a significantly

better prognosis, with an overall survival of 30.5%. In contrast, the overall survival rate of

pulseless electrical activity SCA is approximately 8% with 7.5% for home arrests and 14.9%

for public arrests.(76)

25
Efforts to improve survival based on in-hospital interventions have shown limited

impact. Despite the valuable effect of targeted temperature control and early coronary

angiography on survival, the two techniques are only applicable to patients admitted alive to

hospital. Increasing the number of patients admitted alive and improving strategies addressing

the entire population of SCA are therefore required, and a better focus on pre-hospital

resuscitation is needed.

The key elements of successful resuscitation, also called basic life support, include

cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) maneuvers and early defibrillation when appropriate

(Figure 5).(74)(77) The importance of rapid CPR initiation cannot be overemphasized,

because the probability of successful resuscitation quickly declines over time. This is

particularly true for witnessed SCA caused by VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, for

which the survival rates decrease by 7–10% for every minute between collapse and the first

defibrillation.(78) Early initiation of high-quality CPR extends the successful defibrillation

window by delaying the degeneration of shockable rhythms into ventricular asystole.(78)

High-quality CPR can deliver up to 25–33% of normal cardiac output and is a substantial

contributor to intact neurologic function in resuscitated patients.(77)

The role of early defibrillation has also been well demonstrated.(79) Community

strategies that improve the delivery of early defibrillation to SCA victims include training and

equipping first responders (fire and law enforcement), EMS personnel, and paramedics to

defibrillate, as well as placing AEDs in highly populated locations such as airports,

commercial aircraft, and gambling casinos, with education of the public to the use of AEDs

through Public Access Defibrillation programs.(73)(80)(81) The latter strategy has been

shown to approximately double the number of neurologically intact out-of-hospital cardiac

arrest survivors when laypersons are trained and equipped to provide early CPR and

26
defibrillation with AED, compared with providing CPR alone while awaiting arrival of EMS

personnel.(61)

Figure 5: The Chain of Survival. The Chain of Survival summarises the vital links
needed for successful resuscitation. The 4 links in the out-of-hospital Chain of
Survival are 1) Recognition of cardiac arrest and activation of the emergency response
system; 2) Early CPR with an emphasis on chest compressions; 3) Rapid
defibrillation; 4) Post resuscitation care. CPR: CardioPulmonary Resuscitation

However, basic life support is not systematically performed, since witnesses are not

always present, and when present, they are not always educated to basic life support and/or

aware of the necessity initiating resuscitative maneuvers. When performed, the efficacy of

basic life support is often limited by the relatively long delay elapsed before it is initiated,

knowing that each additional minute of delay reduces the likelihood of survival by 7 to

10%.(82) Besides, it is also limited by the irregular availability of AEDs at the site of SCA

due to the difficulty in matching the location of SCA and AED.(83) According to a Danish

study, a nearby AED was inaccessible in more than half of off-hours OHCA, even though it

was located within walking distance of the OHCA.(84)

27
2. Chapter 1
2.1. Introduction

It has been proven that STEMI occurring during off-hours have a worse prognosis compared

to those occurring during regular hours. Whether the same impact is observed on pre-hospital

SCA has not been well assessed yet. The first part of the thesis aimed to assess the impact of

the time of SCA occurrence on its prognosis.

Using data from the SDEC registry that includes all out-of-hospital SCA occurring in

Paris and its suburbs since 2011, we compared characteristics, management, and outcomes of

SCA occurring during off-hours to those occurring during regular hours. Among 9,834 SCA

included between 2011 and 2014, 63.4% occurred during off-hours. Witnesses were more

often present (74.4% vs. 72.1%, P=0.01) but they less often performed CPR (48.4% vs.

52.1%, P=0.001) and used AEDS (0.6% vs. 6.1%, P=0.004). Time delay between the call to

EMS and EMS arrival was similar in the two groups. In-hospital management did not differ in

terms of targeted temperature central, coronary angiography, and coronary angioplasty.

Survival at hospital discharge was lower during off-hours (4.7% vs. 6.5%, P<0.0001).

However, after adjustment for time of occurrence, age, sex, shockable initial rhythm,

bystander initiated CPR, and OHCA location, there was no difference in survival rate between

regular-hours and off-hours OHCA (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69–1.06, P=0.15).

As in STEMI, a lower survival rate is observed during off-hours compared to regular-

hours SCA, despite a similar EMS and in-hospital management. This difference seems to be

due to a difference in the initial management by bystanders present on site, highlighting the

major impact of the initial management of SCA on its prognosis.

28
2.2. Article

29
30
31
32
33
34
3. Chapter 2

3.1. Introduction

Given the major importance of optimal early management of SCA observed in the first paper

of the thesis, and the potential benefit that could be obtained from planning this early SCA

management before its occurrence, the second part of the thesis tested the hypothesis that

identification of patients at high risk of imminent SCA among STEMI patients is feasible.

Using data from the e-MUST registry that includes all STEMI occurring in Paris and

its suburbs since 2003, we identified 5 simple predictors for the occurrence of out-of-hospital

SCA at the early phase of STEMI using the characteristics routinely assessed by EMS

dispatchers on the phone in cases of chest pain: younger age, absence of obesity, absence of

diabetes mellitus, shortness of breath, and a short delay between pain onset and call to EMS.

Using those variables, we built an SCA prediction score that we than validated internally on

one third of the population, and externally on a STEMI population from another French

region (Haute Savoie). The risk of pre-hospital SCA increased 2-fold in patients with a score

between 10 and 19, 4-fold in those with a score between 20 and 29, and >18-fold in patients

with a score ≥30 compared with those with scores <10. The SCA rate was 28.9% in patients

with a score ≥30 compared with 1.6% in patients with a score ≤9 (P for trend <0.001). The

area under the curve values were 0.7033 in the internal validation sample and 0.6031 in the

external validation sample. Sensitivity and specificity varied between 96.9% and 10.5% for

scores ≥10 and between 18.0% and 97.6% for scores ≥30, with scores between 20 and 29

achieving the best sensitivity and specificity (65.4% and 62.6%, respectively).

Early identification of patients at risk of SCA during STEMI is feasible via this simple

5-variables score that is easily obtainable at the phone might help the EMS manage and

dispatch the STEMI cases according to their risk of SCA.

35
3.2.Article

36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplementary Table 1 – Repartition of the e-MUST and of the external validation populations

Total Sample e-MUST


N=8112 External
Derivation sample (2/3) Validation sample (1/3) validation
N=5353 N=2759 sample
N=606
4902 patients with complete data 2520 patients with complete data

47
Supplementary Table 2 – Characteristics of the patients in the total e-MUST population, the

derivation and the validation samples

Derivation Validation
All patients
sample sample P
(n=8112)
(n=5353) (n=2759)
Age
Median (IQR) 60 (51 - 73) 60 (51 - 73) 60 (51 – 73) 0.63
≤ 40 years, n (%) 414 (5.1) 272 (5.1) 142 (5.2) 0.99
41 – 50 years, n (%) 1,530 (19.0) 1,008 (18.9) 522 (19.0)
51 – 60 years, n (%) 2,258 (28.0) 1,496 (28.1) 762 (27.8)
61 – 70 years, n (%) 1,568 (19.4) 1,032 (19.4) 536 (19.5)
> 70 years, n (%) 2,300 (28.5) 1,518 (28.5) 782 (28.5)
Male, n (%) 6,322 (78.1) 4,181 (78.3) 2,141 (77.7) 0.49
Risk factors
Past history of CAD, n (%) 1,505 (19.0) 1,004 (19.2) 501 (18.6) 0.47
Familial CAD history, n (%) 1,470 (18.5) 963 (18.4) 507 (18.8) 0.72
Current smoking, n (%) 4,188 (52.8) 2,770 (53) 1,418 (52.5) 0.65
Diabetes, n (%) 1,195 (15.1) 785 (15) 410 (15.2) 0.86
Hypertension, n (%) 3,166 (40) 2,088 (40) 1,078 (39.9) 0.96
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 2,826 (35.7) 1,875 (35.9) 951 (35.2) 0.54
Obesity, n (%) 1,963 (24.8) 1,310 (25.1) 653 (24.2) 0.4
Shortness of breath, n (%) 281 (3.6) 187 (3.6) 94 (3.6) 0.9
Chest pain onset-to-call delay
Median (IQR) 60 (26 – 165) 60 (25 – 166) 60 (26 – 162) 0.83
≤ 30 minutes, n (%) 2,409 (30.4) 1,592 (30.4) 817 (30.3) 0.48
31 – 60 minutes, n (%) 1,561 (19.7) 1,022 (19.6) 539 (20)
61 – 120 minutes, n (%) 1,410 (17.8) 910 (17.4) 500 (18.5)
> 120 minutes, n (%) 2,544 (32.1) 1,702 (32.6) 842 (32.2)
Call to EMS arrival delay
20 (14 – 28) 20 (14 – 28) 20 (14 – 28) 0.83
Median (IQR)
SCA occurrence, n (%) 452 (5.6) 297 (5.5) 155 (5.6) 0.92
Total Death, n (%) (N=7791) 459 (5.9) 308 (6.0) 151 (5.7) 0.56

P values are for comparison between the derivation and validation sample using the Chi-square test or
Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate.
SCA: Sudden Cardiac Arrest; CAD: Coronary Artery Disease; EMS: Emergency Medical Services

48
Supplementary Table 3 – Univariate analysis in the derivation sample

Derivation sample Without SCA With SCA


P
(n=5353) (n=5056) (n=297)
Age
Median (IQR) 60 (51 - 73) 60 (51 - 73) 57 (48 - 69) < 0.0001
≤ 40 years, n (%) 272 (5.1) 248 (4.9) 24 (8.1) 0.003
41 – 50 years, n (%) 1,008 (18.9) 934 (18.6) 74 (25.1)
51 – 60 years, n (%) 1,496 (28.1) 1,420 (28.2) 76 (25.8)
61 – 70 years, n (%) 1,032 (19.4) 978 (19.4) 54 (18.3)
> 70 years, n (%) 1,518 (28.5) 1,451 (28.8) 67 (22.7)
Male, n (%) 4,181 (78.3) 3,946 (78.3) 235 (79.1) 0.53
Risk factors
Past history of CAD, n (%) 1,004 (19.2) 951 (19.3) 53 (18.1) 0.61
Familial CAD history, n (%) 963 (18.4) 918 (18.6) 45 (15.4) 0.16
Current smoking, n (%) 2,770 (53.0) 2,615 (53.0) 155 (52.9) 0.96
Diabetes, n (%) 785 (15.0) 756 (15.3) 29 (9.9) 0.01
Hypertension, n (%) 2,088 (40.0) 1,994 (40.5) 94 (32.1) 0.005
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 1,875 (35.9) 1,782 (36.1) 93 (31.7) 0.13
Obesity, n (%) 1,963 (24.8) 1,261 (25.6) 49 (16.7) < 0.0001
Shortness of breath, n (%) 187 (3.6) 135 (2.8) 52 (19.3) < 0.0001
Chest pain onset-to-call delay < 0.0001
Median (IQR) 60 (25 - 166) 63 (26 – 170) 36 (13 – 78) < 0.0001
≤ 30 min, n (%) 1,592 (30.4) 1,464 (29.6) 128 (45.1)
31 – 60 min, n (%) 1,022 (19.6) 959 (19.4) 63 (22.2)
61 – 120 min, n (%) 910 (17.4) 868 (17.6) 42 (14.8)
> 120 min, n (%) 1,702 (32.6) 1,651 (33.4) 51 (18.0)
Call to EMS arrival delay
20 (14 - 28) 20 (14 – 28) 18 (13 – 30) 0.07(*)
Median (IQR)
Total Death, n (%) (N=5131) 308 (6.0) 203 (4.2) 105 (35.9) < 0.0001

P values were obtained with a Kruskal-Wallis or a Chi-square test as appropriate. SCA: Sudden
Cardiac Arrest; CAD: Coronary Artery Disease; EMS: Emergency Medical Services

49
Supplementary Figure – Predicted and observed numbers of sudden cardiac arrest in the

internal validation sample, by decile of predicted risk of sudden cardiac arrest

SCA : Sudden Cardiac Arrest; n: number; STEMI: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The properties

of the model were assessed in the validation sample (n=2520)

50
Supplementary Table 4 – Characteristics of the external validation sample for factors included

in the score

All patients Without SCA With SCA


N (n=606) (n=567) (n=39)
Age (year) 606
Median (IQR) 62 (54-74) 62 (53-74) 61 (55-78)
≤ 40 years, n (%) 16 (2.6) 15 (2.7) 1 (2.6)
41 – 50 years, n (%) 91 (15) 87 (15.3) 4 (10.3)
51 – 60 years, n (%) 170 (28.1) 155 (27.3) 15 (38.4)
61 – 70 years, n (%) 132 (21.8) 125 (22.1) 7 (17.9)
> 70 years, n (%) 197 (32.5) 185 (32.6) 12 (30.8)
Male, n (%) 606 475 (78.4) 447 (78.8) 28 (71.8)
Risk factors
Diabetes, n (%) 604 75 (12.4) 71 (12.5) 4 (10.3)
Obesity, n (%) 575 160 (27.8) 151 (28.1) 9 (23.1)
Shortness of breath, n (%) 600 15 (2.5) 13 (2.3) 2 (5.1)
Chest pain onset-to-call delay 586
(minutes)
Median (IQR) 65 (25-153) 65 (25-153) 16.5 (2.5-175.0)
≤ 30 minutes, n (%) 188 (32.1) 168 (30.5) 20 (57.1)
31 – 60 minutes, n (%) 100 (17.1) 98 (17.8) 2 (5.7)
61 – 120 minutes, n (%) 1 24 (21.1) 119 (21.6) 5 (14.3)
> 120 minutes, n (%) 174 (29.7) 166 (30.1) 8 (22.9)

51
4. Discussion
Among 9,834 all-comers SCA in the general population of Paris and its suburbs between

2011 and 2014 (SDEC population), the survival rate at hospital discharge was 5.4%. This

survival was even lower during off-hours, mainly due to an insufficient early management by

the witnesses on site, while EMS arrival delays and in-hospital management were similar in

the two groups. In contrast, among EMS-witnessed SCA at the early phase of STEMI (e-

MUST population), the survival rate was of 64%. Those results highlight the major

importance of early minutes of SCA management. In order to improve initial SCA

management through a better anticipation, we created an SCA prediction score, easy to obtain

on the phone, and that was able to predict SCA in STEMI with a good performance.

4.1. Strategies to Reduce SCA Burden

So far, two strategies have been used in order to reduce SCA burden: the resuscitation

strategy and the prevention strategy.

4.1.1. Resuscitation Strategy

Resuscitation strategies aim on improving pre-hospital management and optimizing treatment

during the hospital phase once SCA has occurred.

The in-hospital phase is mainly based on targeted temperature control and coronary

angiography.(26)(85)(86) After initial positive results of therapeutic hypothermia in SCA,(87)

several reports showed that mild targeted temperature control can be sufficient.(88)

Accordingly, the optimal target temperature still needs to be defined and better understanding

of its mechanisms and impacts is needed.(89) Besides, therapeutic hypothermia has only been

shown to improve overall survival and rates of favorable neurological survival in patients with

SCA due to VF.(90) As for early coronary angiography and angioplasty, registry data

suggests a favorable impact on survival, due to the high rate of occluded arteries in

52
SCA.(91)(26) However, there is no randomized study on this topic. Globally, the benefit of

coronary angiography is not observed if it is not followed by angioplasty.(92) Therefore,

patients presenting ST-segment elevation on their EKG benefit the most from systematic early

coronary angiography due to the high rate of occluded arteries on their coronary angiography,

which it is frequently followed by angioplasty.(92)(26) Among patients who do not present

ST-elevation, the rate of occluded arteries is lower, and the benefit of early coronary

angiography is still under investigation with several on-going randomized trials comparing

early to delayed coronary angiography.(93) Regardless of the in-hospital strategy used to

improve SCA prognosis, the main limitation is that it only targets patients admitted alive to

hospital, which limits its impact on the global SCA prognosis. Therefore, increasing the

number of SCA admitted alive through appropriate pre-hospital management is essential for

successful resuscitation.

In the SDEC population, the similar in-hospital management, including rates of

coronary angiography and targeted temperature control, between regular and off-hours could

not make up for the difference in the initial pre-hospital management. The survival rate was

ultimately lower during off-hours, highlighting the major importance of early management of

SCA.

At the pre-hospital phase, basic life support with early CPR and AED use has proven

its efficacy when initiated early after SCA occurrence, and is the cornerstone in

resuscitation.(4)(94) However, this strategy faces a major limitation, which is the relatively

long delay elapsed before it is initiated, knowing that each additional minute of delay reduces

the likelihood of survival by 7 to 10%.(82) This delay is due both to the irregular presence of

bystanders at the time of SCA occurrence, and to their insufficient awareness of their role in

initiating resuscitation when present, due to the lack of public education on basic life support.

We previously demonstrated that major regional disparities exist in the actual implementation

53
of public access defibrillation programs, whether in terms of density of persons educated in

basic life support, or of cumulative density of AEDs deployed.(95) According to the same

study, the quality of resuscitation is also influenced by the lack of basic life support education,

since population education was still an independent predictor of survival, even after

adjustment to the rate of CPR.(95)

When considering the difference between the survival rates in the SDEC and e-MUST

populations, the survival rate is more than ten times higher in the e-MUST study, where all

SCA cases were due to STEMI, and were witnessed by EMS who immediately started

resuscitation. It is known that cardiac causes of SCA are associated with a higher survival rate

compared to other causes of SCA.(96)(97)(98) The even higher survival rate observed in the

e-MUST study is most probably the result of EMS presence at the time of SCA occurrence,

which have proven to be a predictor of favorable outcome in SCA, by allowing immediate

initiation of CPR and defibrillation when SCA occurred.(79)(99) In comparison, the survival

rate in the SDEC is more in line with the usual survival rates in SCA series. CPR was only

performed in around a third of the population, while AEDs were used in less than 2% of

cases. Besides, the quality of CPR performed by witnesses could have been inferior to that

performed by EMS. This survival difference was even higher during off-hours where survival

was 4.7% with a lower rate of witness presence, CPR and AED use, for which the similar

EMS and in-hospital management compared to regular hours, could not compensate. All these

finding highlights the major impact of the early minutes after SCA occurrence, and the

advantage of having a bystander on site who is able to start efficient resuscitation without any

delay.

54
4.1.2. Prevention Strategy

Prevention strategies aim on detecting individuals at high-risk for SCA at mid- or long-term,

mainly for selecting patients who would benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Several risk factors were investigated whether at the patient or at the general population

levels. Among them, ejection fraction was identified as the main SCA risk factor, and it is

currently used to guide implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.(100) However,

it has its limitation and it is globally admitted that ejection fraction alone is not an optimal risk

factor, due to its poor sensitivity and specificity, as well as its limited positive predictive

value.(101) In a study conducted in Portland, Oregon between 2002 and 2012, on cases of

SCA with echocardiographic evaluation before the event, 67.9% of the patients were initially

deemed ineligible to implantable cardioverter defibrillators implantation because of left

ventricular ejection fraction >35%.(102) Other risk factors have also been investigated

including electrical abnormalities such as prolonged QTc and QRS intervals,(103)(104)

increased heart rate,(105) family history of SCA,(106)(107) and genetic

determinants.(108)(109) Even though prevention globally allowed the identification of several

SCA risk factors in the general population, it did not allow a specific risk assessment for a

given patient. Therefore, the idea of combining risk factors emerged, and several risk scores

were created to improve SCA risk assessment.(110) However, those SCA scores were not

eventually deemed specific for SCA since they predicted to the same extent the risk of non-

sudden cardiac death as well.(111) In practice, current prevention technique lack specificity in

SCA prediction, and are not able to efficiently assess the individual risk of SCA, and to

provide an estimation of the potential time of SCA occurrence.

The e-MUST score allowed a reliable assessment of imminent SCA risk using a

simple score of five simple variables easily obtained on the phone by EMS dispatchers. In the

high-risk category, almost a third of patients presented SCD compared to 1.6% in the low risk

55
group. The use of this score might help EMS organize the STEMI management according to

the risk of SCA, which implies an optimization of EMS dispatching and a more rapid

deployment of interventions in the field when high risk is detected. Actions can therefore be

initiated even before EMS arrival such as advising bystanders to locate the nearest automated

external defibrillator, and sending firefighters on site before EMS arrival.

4.2. Burden of STEMI-Related SCA

According to the analysis from the e-MUST study, pre-hospital SCA is a relatively frequent

event at the early phase of STEMI, occurring in one of 20 patients. Two approaches have

traditionally been used to evaluate the incidence of pre-hospital SCA in the setting of STEMI.

The first approach has been built on STEMI databases, which were conducted in

catheterization laboratories or in intensive care unit since the diagnosis of STEMI could not

be made before, due to the infrequent availability of pre-hospital EKG in most

EMS.(112)(113)(114)(115) These studies therefore only included patients admitted alive to

hospital, which led to an underestimation of the real burden of pre-hospital SCA in the setting

of STEMI. The second approach has been based on SCA registries, where efforts were made

to identify retrospectively among SCA, those related to STEMI.(5) The latter approach

encountered major difficulties in identifying STEMI-related SCA cases, given the limited

predictive value of EKG in this setting, the poor survival rate to hospital admission, and the

low proportion of SCA patients who eventually undergo coronary angiography to ascertain

the diagnosis of STEMI. (116) The e-MUST study was able to provide a better estimate of the

real incidence of pre-hospital SCA in STEMI, even though it could not include patients who

presented SCA before EMS arrival.

Regarding the impact of early SCA on the short-term and long-term STEMI , data are

inconsistent.(112)(113)(114)(115) While retrospective analyses of the PAMI trial indicated no

56
increase in in-hospital mortality or one-year mortality for SCA,(39) retrospective analyses of

the APEX-AMI trial revealed an increased 90-day mortality rate.(38) In line with the APEX-

AMI trial results, observational case-control studies suggested an increase in in-hospital

mortality for VF patients with STEMI but no increase in the long-term mortality rate for these

patients compared with STEMI patients without VF.(117)(118) None of these studies could

assess the pre-hospital mortality, and therefore a complete analysis of the prognostic impact

of SCA on STEMI prognosis was not possible. According to the e-MUST study, more than a

third of deaths in the SCA group occurred before hospital admission, all of which would have

been excluded in traditional STEMI databases. By including those patients in our study, even

though patients who died before EMS were missed, we were able to better assess the real

impact of pre-hospital SCA on STEMI prognosis. The survival rate in the SCA group was

64%. Even though this is an outstanding survival rate for a SCA series, it remains much lower

than the 95% survival rate observed among STEMI patients who did not present SCA.

Accordingly, early SCA is a potentially fatal complication that needs to be better addressed in

future health plans focused on STEMI.

4.3. Predictors of Pre-Hospital STEMI-Related SCA

When going through the variables included in the e-MUST score, the more frequent anterior

location of STEMI in the SCA group is in line with previous studies that showed, among

patients who present SCA, a higher rate of left main and left anterior descending coronary

artery disease, which are the culprit lesions in anterior myocardial infarction.(114)(119)

Similarly, the higher rate of extensive myocardial infarction, and therefore of acute heart

failure and dyspnea, in the SCA group were also expected.(120)(121)(122)(123)

By contrast, the association of short delays between pain onset and EMS arrival with

an increased risk of SCA deserves specific consideration. Although one would expect a higher

57
rate of SCA due to greater myocardial damage with prolonged ischemia, large amount of data

now support the presence in some patients of an intrinsic susceptibility to develop severe

ventricular arrhythmias during myocardial ischemia, called the rhythmic vulnerability, and

leading to SCA early after ischemia onset, mainly within the first minutes.(124)(125)(126)

This rhythmic vulnerability has been well demonstrated in the past decade, with pivotal

studies providing clear evidence for a familial clustering of SCA cases in this setting of acute

myocardial ischemia. (107)(106)(127)(128)(129)

The analysis of factors associated with pre-hospital SCA at the early phase of STEMI

in the e-MUST study shows the presence of a “risk factors paradox”. Traditional

cardiovascular risk factors include advanced age, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus,

hyperlipidemia, obesity and family history of CAD.(130). In the e-MUST population, all

those risk factors were less frequent among patients who presented SCA. Besides, young age,

absence of diabetes, and absence of obesity were independent predictors of SCA.

Accordingly, even though traditional cardiovascular risk factors lead to an increased

prevalence of CAD and STEMI, they are associated to a lower risk of SCA once STEMI has

occurred. We may hypothesize that chronic CAD in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk

factors leads to a progressive development of collateral circulation, which alleviates the

consequences of an abrupt coronary artery occlusion, while patients with fewer risk factors

potentially have more recent CAD with less collaterals to compensate for an acute coronary

occlusion .(131)(132)

Strength and Limitations

Both the SDEC and the e-MUST registries provide unique opportunities to obtain an

exhaustive inclusion of all SCA and STEMI cases in Paris and its suburbs. The 2 registries

have a great exhaustiveness of more than 90%.

58
The SDEC registry is part of the SDEC that was created in 2011through a close

collaboration between the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM),

different Parisian Universities, the Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, the Regional

Agency of Health and the Agency of Biomedicine, and with the partnership of all the

Reference Centres that already exist for specific cardiac conditions throughout French

territory. Its 3 axes of development patient care, education and research. Inclusion of patients

in the SDEC registry occurs through both a passive (systematic sent by the EMS within hours

of every assessed SCA) and an active (electronic query algorithm is also performed in the

advanced cardiac life support computer system to identify every case of SCA) process.

Moreover, regular controls based on diagnostic codes are conducted in selected intensive care

units. Therefore, the exhaustiveness of the database is above 98%. Of note, contrary to

traditional SCA registries, the SDEC registry includes all SCA assessed by the EMS, even if

resuscitation is not attempted, which gives a complete picture of all SCA cases in Paris and its

suburbs.

The e-MUST registry was initiated in 2003 under the auspices of the French Ministry

and is funded by the Health Regional Agency of the Greater Paris Area, and coordinated by

its registry department and by a scientific board. Its data is analyzed in the Paris Sudden

Death Expertise Center. It benefits from the unique organization of the French EMS that

allows the diagnosis of STEMI and the inclusion of the patients in the registry right in the

field. Most EMS worldwide either do not perform EKGs in the field, or do not have

physicians on board to confirm STEMI diagnosis before hospital arrival. The French EMS has

the specificity of having both the possibility to perform an EKG in the field, and a physician

present with the EMS team in case of chest pain. The diagnosis of STEMI is therefore

obtained minutes after EMS arrival and the patients can be included in the registry even if

they are not admitted to the hospital. We were therefore able to perform the first analysis of

59
STEMI-related SCA mortality that included patients who died before hospital admission who

had never been described so far.

Several limitations have to be acknowledged. First, both registries are conducted in

Paris and its suburbs. The extent to which their results can be applied to different regions with

different EMS systems remains to be demonstrated. However, an external validation of the e-

MUST score was performed on a population from another French region and it showed a

good performance. Second, the e-MUST registry did not include patients who presented SCA

before EMS arrival, due to the limited reliability of EKGs in diagnosing STEMI once SCA

has occurred. Besides, despite providing valuable information for understanding STEMI-

related SCA, several variables specific to SCA, such as family history of SCA and low flow

delays, were not available in the e-MUST registry, since this is initially a STEMI registry.

Finally, even though a difference in the quality of CPR can be expected between the all-comer

laypersons' CPR in the SDEC study, and EMS-provided CPR in the e-MUST study, this

difference could not be assessed in any of the registries.

60
5. Conclusion

Global survival of SCA remains extremely low (5.4%) in Paris and its suburbs. The rates of

bystander presence, bystander CPR, and bystander AED use are still suboptimal. SCA

occurring during off hours have a lower survival rate compared to regular-hours SCA, despite

similar EMS arrival delays and in-hospital management. This difference seems to be due to a

difference in the initial management by bystanders present on site, which is worse during off

hours. This highlights the major impact of the initial management of SCA on its prognosis,

and the need to optimize this phase of resuscitation.

Pre-hospital SCA is a relatively frequent complication of STEMI, with an incidence of

EMS-witnessed SCA of 5.6%. Despite a lower survival rate compared to STEMIs who did

not present SCA, survival rate of STEMI-related SCA witnessed by EMS was extremely high

for a SCA series (64%). This survival rate is partially due to the ischemic cause of SCA that

carries a better prognosis, but the main explanation of this rate is probably the presence of

EMS at the time of SCA allowing immediate and efficient resuscitation.

Five simple predictors of STEMI-related SCA were identified: younger age, absence

of obesity, absence of diabetes mellitus, shortness of breath, and a short delay between pain

onset and call to EMS. Using these variables, we created a SCA prediction score that allowed

a good estimation of the pre-hospital SCA risk among STEMI patients. The use of this score

would help EMS planning STEMI management according to the risk of SCA, and anticipating

SCA occurrence in order to limit the burden of this fatal complication.

61
6. Perspectives

The persistent huge burden of SCA despite the traditional methods for SCA burden reduction

highlights the need for a novel approach. Anticipation can be a potential solution by

identifying high risk of SCA in a given individual a few moments before its occurrence.

Accordingly, when an imminent SCA is suspected, early management can be planned

allowing resuscitation to be initiated rapidly and in an optimized setting if SCA occurs.

The e-MUST score demonstrates that SCA anticipation is feasible among patients with

symptoms due to STEMI, and opens the path for future research in this regard. On a more

global level, a valuable opportunity can be foreseen to develop a new strategy based on near-

term prevention to ensure that resuscitation will be initiated early enough after SCA, or even

that prophylactic therapy will be initiated in this well targeted population for preventing SCA.

This approach becomes even more attractive with current advances in technologies that now

allow EKG monitoring of heart rhythm and repolarization abnormalities through smartphone

applications which data can be shared with the EMS dispatcher who would be able to plan

SCA management even before the dispatching of an EMS team. The addition of

“anticipation” as a new link in the chain of survival can therefore be suggested in order to

incorporate this strategy (Figure 6). The large-scale applicability and efficacy of this novel yet

complementary approach requires testing in prospective studies in the near future.

62
Figure 6. Revised Chain of Survival. Sudden cardiac death management was initially
restricted to health professionals till the 1970s when the first mass citizen training in CPR
was held in Seattle, Washington. In 1990s, early Public Access Defibrillation programs
were developed to provide training and resources for the public to be able to aid in the
resuscitation of cardiac arrest victims. In 2017, we suggest the introduction of a new link to
the chain of survival, aimed on near-term prevention through Anticipation. CPR:
CardioPulmonary Resuscitation. (Karam et al, International Journal of Cardiology 2017)

63
7. References
1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart

disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart

Association. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28–292.

2. Strömsöe A, Svensson L, Axelsson ÅB, Claesson A, Göransson KE, Nordberg P, et al.

Improved outcome in Sweden after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and possible

association with improvements in every link in the chain of survival. Eur Heart J. 2015

Apr 7;36(14):863–71.

3. Wong MKY, Morrison LJ, Qiu F, Austin PC, Cheskes S, Dorian P, et al. Trends in

short- and long-term survival among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients alive at

hospital arrival. Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1883–90.

4. Hasselqvist-Ax I, Riva G, Herlitz J, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, Nordberg P, et al.

Early Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med.

2015 juin;372(24):2307–15.

5. Dudas K, Lappas G, Stewart S, Rosengren A. Trends in out-of-hospital deaths due to

coronary heart disease in Sweden (1991 to 2006). Circulation. 2011 Jan 4;123(1):46–52.

6. Deo R, Albert CM. Epidemiology and Genetics of Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation.

2012 Jan 31;125(4):620–37.

7. Fishman GI, Chugh SS, DiMarco JP, Albert CM, Anderson ME, Bonow RO, et al.

Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction and Prevention. Circulation. 2010 Nov

30;122(22):2335–48.

8. Hayashi M, Shimizu W, Albert CM. The Spectrum of Epidemiology Underlying Sudden

Cardiac Death. Circ Res. 2015 Jun 5;116(12):1887.

64
9. Becker LB, Han BH, Meyer PM, Wright FA, Rhodes KV, Smith DW, et al. Racial

differences in the incidence of cardiac arrest and subsequent survival. The CPR Chicago

Project. N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 26;329(9):600–6.

10. Kannel WB, Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Cobb J. Sudden coronary death in women.

Am Heart J. 1998 Aug;136(2):205–12.

11. Eckart RE, Shry EA, Burke AP, McNear JA, Appel DA, Castillo-Rojas LM, et al.

Sudden death in young adults: an autopsy-based series of a population undergoing active

surveillance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 13;58(12):1254–61.

12. Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Olsufka M, Copass MK. Changing incidence of out-of-

hospital ventricular fibrillation, 1980-2000. JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):3008–13.

13. Fox CS, Evans JC, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Levy D. Temporal trends in coronary heart

disease mortality and sudden cardiac death from 1950 to 1999: the Framingham Heart

Study. Circulation. 2004 Aug 3;110(5):522–7.

14. Gerber Y, Jacobsen SJ, Frye RL, Weston SA, Killian JM, Roger VL. Secular trends in

deaths from cardiovascular diseases: a 25-year community study. Circulation. 2006 May

16;113(19):2285–92.

15. Arciero TJ, Jacobsen SJ, Reeder GS, Frye RL, Weston SA, Killian JM, et al. Temporal

trends in the incidence of coronary disease. Am J Med. 2004 Aug 15;117(4):228–33.

16. Members AF, Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M,

et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias

and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 29;ehv316.

17. Spain DM, Bradess VA, Mohr C. Coronary atherosclerosis as a cause of unexpected and

unexplained death. An autopsy study from 1949-1959. JAMA. 1960 Sep 24;174:384–8.

18. de Vreede-Swagemakers JJ, Gorgels AP, Dubois-Arbouw WI, van Ree JW, Daemen MJ,

Houben LG, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the 1990’s: a population-based study

65
in the Maastricht area on incidence, characteristics and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol.

1997 Nov 15;30(6):1500–5.

19. Albert CM, McGovern BA, Newell JB, Ruskin JN. Sex differences in cardiac arrest

survivors. Circulation. 1996 Mar 15;93(6):1170–6.

20. Zipes DP, Wellens HJ. Sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1998 Nov 24;98(21):2334–51.

21. Behr E, Wood DA, Wright M, Syrris P, Sheppard MN, Casey A, et al. Cardiological

assessment of first-degree relatives in sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. Lancet Lond

Engl. 2003 Nov 1;362(9394):1457–9.

22. Behr ER, Casey A, Sheppard M, Wright M, Bowker TJ, Davies MJ, et al. Sudden

arrhythmic death syndrome: a national survey of sudden unexplained cardiac death.

Heart Br Card Soc. 2007 May;93(5):601–5.

23. Albert CM, McGovern BA, Newell JB, Ruskin JN. Sex Differences in Cardiac Arrest

Survivors. Circulation. 1996 Mar 15;93(6):1170–6.

24. Murakoshi N, Aonuma K. Epidemiology of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in

Asia. Circ J Off J Jpn Circ Soc. 2013;77(10):2419–31.

25. Kaltman JR, Thompson PD, Lantos J, Berul CI, Botkin J, Cohen JT, et al. Screening for

sudden cardiac death in the young: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute

working group. Circulation. 2011 May 3;123(17):1911–8.

26. Spaulding CM, Joly LM, Rosenberg A, Monchi M, Weber SN, Dhainaut JF, et al.

Immediate coronary angiography in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J

Med. 1997 Jun 5;336(23):1629–33.

27. Adelson L, Hoffman W. Sudden death from coronary disease related to a lethal

mechanism arising independently of vascular occlusion or myocardial damage. JAMA.

1961 Apr 15;176:129–35.

66
28. Farb A, Tang AL, Burke AP, Sessums L, Liang Y, Virmani R. Sudden coronary death.

Frequency of active coronary lesions, inactive coronary lesions, and myocardial

infarction. Circulation. 1995 Oct 1;92(7):1701–9.

29. Davies MJ, Thomas A. Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac

ischemic death. N Engl J Med. 1984 May 3;310(18):1137–40.

30. American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography

and Interventions, O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, et al. 2013

ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a

report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association

Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):e78-140.

31. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third

universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct

16;60(16):1581–98.

32. Jain S, Ting HT, Bell M, Bjerke CM, Lennon RJ, Gersh BJ, et al. Utility of left bundle

branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.

2011 Apr 15;107(8):1111–6.

33. Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of

the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP,

Blömstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial

infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012

Oct;33(20):2569–619.

34. Bayés de Luna A, Coumel P, Leclercq JF. Ambulatory sudden cardiac death:

mechanisms of production of fatal arrhythmia on the basis of data from 157 cases. Am

Heart J. 1989 Jan;117(1):151–9.

67
35. Newby KH, Thompson T, Stebbins A, Topol EJ, Califf RM, Natale A. Sustained

ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: incidence and

outcomes. The GUSTO Investigators. Circulation. 1998 Dec 8;98(23):2567–73.

36. Lettieri C, Savonitto S, De Servi S, Guagliumi G, Belli G, Repetto A, et al. Emergency

percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: early and medium-term outcome. Am

Heart J. 2009 Mar;157(3):569–575.e1.

37. Henry TD, Sharkey SW, Burke MN, Chavez IJ, Graham KJ, Henry CR, et al. A regional

system to provide timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation

myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007 Aug 14;116(7):721–8.

38. Mehta RH, Starr AZ, Lopes RD, Hochman JS, Widimsky P, Pieper KS, et al. Incidence

of and outcomes associated with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in patients

undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2009 May

6;301(17):1779–89.

39. Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Grines L, Stone GW, Boura J, Cox D, et al. Sustained ventricular

tachycardia or fibrillation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory among patients

receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and

outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 19;43(10):1765–72.

40. Bougouin W, Marijon E, Puymirat E, Defaye P, Celermajer D, Le Heuzey J, et al.

Incidence of sudden cardiac death after ventricular fibrillation complicating acute

myocardial infarction: a 5-year cause-of-death analysis of the FAST-MI 2005 registry.

Eur Heart J. 2014;35:116–22.

41. de Jong JSSG, Marsman RF, Henriques JPS, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Tanck MWT, et

al. Prognosis among survivors of primary ventricular fibrillation in the percutaneous

coronary intervention era. Am Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):467–72.

68
42. Russo AM, Stainback RF, Bailey SR, Epstein AE, Heidenreich PA, Jessup M, et al.

ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013 appropriate use criteria for

implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy: a report of

the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force,

Heart Rhythm Society, American Heart Association, American Society of

Echocardiography, Heart Failure Society of America, Society for Cardiovascular

Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and

Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar

26;61(12):1318–68.

43. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors

and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med.

1997 May 1;336(18):1276–82.

44. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang Y, Smialek J, Virmani R. Effect of risk factors on

the mechanism of acute thrombosis and sudden coronary death in women. Circulation.

1998 Jun 2;97(21):2110–6.

45. Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R, Miller JP, Rolnitzky LM. The relationships among

ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after

myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1984 Feb;69(2):250–8.

46. Buxton AE. Risk stratification for sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease.

Heart Rhythm. 2009 Jun;6(6):836–47.

47. Greenberg H, Case RB, Moss AJ, Brown MW, Carroll ER, Andrews ML, et al. Analysis

of mortality events in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial

(MADIT-II). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 21;43(8):1459–65.

48. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular

arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death--executive summary: ... -

69
PubMed - NCBI [Internet]. [cited 2017 Aug 17]. Available from:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923744

49. Solomon SD, Wang D, Finn P, Skali H, Zornoff L, McMurray JJV, et al. Effect of

candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in

Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.

Circulation. 2004 Oct 12;110(15):2180–3.

50. Cleland JG, Massie BM, Packer M. Sudden death in heart failure: vascular or electrical?

Eur J Heart Fail. 1999 Mar;1(1):41–5.

51. Szabó BM, van Veldhuisen DJ, Crijns HJ, Wiesfeld AC, Hillege HL, Lie KI. Value of

ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring to identify increased risk of sudden death in

patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1994

Jul;15(7):928–33.

52. Doval HC, Nul DR, Grancelli HO, Varini SD, Soifer S, Corrado G, et al. Nonsustained

ventricular tachycardia in severe heart failure. Independent marker of increased mortality

due to sudden death. GESICA-GEMA Investigators. Circulation. 1996 Dec

15;94(12):3198–203.

53. Authors/Task Force members, Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, Borggrefe M,

Cecchi F, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic

cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic

Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct

14;35(39):2733–79.

54. Elliott PM, Gimeno JR, Thaman R, Shah J, Ward D, Dickie S, et al. Historical trends in

reported survival rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart Br Card Soc.

2006 Jun;92(6):785–91.

70
55. Maron BJ, Ommen SR, Semsarian C, Spirito P, Olivotto I, Maron MS. Hypertrophic

cardiomyopathy: present and future, with translation into contemporary cardiovascular

medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 8;64(1):83–99.

56. Basso C, Corrado D, Marcus FI, Nava A, Thiene G. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular

cardiomyopathy. Lancet Lond Engl. 2009 Apr 11;373(9671):1289–300.

57. Peters S, Trümmel M, Meyners W. Prevalence of right ventricular dysplasia-

cardiomyopathy in a non-referral hospital. Int J Cardiol. 2004 Dec;97(3):499–501.

58. Basso C, Thiene G, Corrado D, Angelini A, Nava A, Valente M. Arrhythmogenic right

ventricular cardiomyopathy. Dysplasia, dystrophy, or myocarditis? Circulation. 1996

Sep 1;94(5):983–91.

59. Narayanan K, Uy-Evanado A, Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Nichols GA, Gunson K, et al.

Mitral valve prolapse and sudden cardiac arrest in the community. Heart Rhythm. 2016

Feb;13(2):498–503.

60. Anders S, Said S, Schulz F, Püschel K. Mitral valve prolapse syndrome as cause of

sudden death in young adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Sep 13;171(2–3):127–30.

61. Basso C, Perazzolo Marra M, Rizzo S, De Lazzari M, Giorgi B, Cipriani A, et al.

Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation. 2015 Aug

18;132(7):556–66.

62. Pellikka PA, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA, Malouf JF, Bailey KR, Scott CG, et al.

Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis

during prolonged follow-up. Circulation. 2005 Jun 21;111(24):3290–5.

63. Kang D-H, Park S-J, Rim JH, Yun S-C, Kim D-H, Song J-M, et al. Early surgery versus

conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010

Apr 6;121(13):1502–9.

71
64. Bhattacharyya S, Hayward C, Pepper J, Senior R. Risk stratification in asymptomatic

severe aortic stenosis: a critical appraisal. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(19):2377–87.

65. Ávila P, Chaix M-A, Mondésert B, Khairy P. Sudden Cardiac Death in Adult Congenital

Heart Disease. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017 Jun;9(2):225–34.

66. Koyak Z, Harris L, de Groot JR, Silversides CK, Oechslin EN, Bouma BJ, et al. Sudden

cardiac death in adult congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2012 Oct 16;126(16):1944–

54.

67. Modi S, Krahn AD. Sudden cardiac arrest without overt heart disease. Circulation. 2011

Jun 28;123(25):2994–3008.

68. Schwartz PJ, Periti M, Malliani A. The long Q-T syndrome. Am Heart J. 1975

Mar;89(3):378–90.

69. Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Napolitano C, Bloise R, Ronchetti E, Grillo M, et al. Risk

stratification in the long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1866–74.

70. Wilde AAM, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M, Brugada J, Brugada R, Brugada P, et al.

Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome: consensus report. Circulation.

2002 Nov 5;106(19):2514–9.

71. Kamakura S, Ohe T, Nakazawa K, Aizawa Y, Shimizu A, Horie M, et al. Long-term

prognosis of probands with Brugada-pattern ST-elevation in leads V1-V3. Circ

Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Oct;2(5):495–503.

72. Delise P, Allocca G, Marras E, Giustetto C, Gaita F, Sciarra L, et al. Risk stratification

in individuals with the Brugada type 1 ECG pattern without previous cardiac arrest:

usefulness of a combined clinical and electrophysiologic approach. Eur Heart J. 2011

Jan;32(2):169–76.

72
73. Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, Travers A, Christenson J, McBurnie MA, et al.

Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J

Med. 2004 Aug 12;351(7):637–46.

74. Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Hemphill R, et al.

Part 1: executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010

Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S640-656.

75. Hasselqvist-Ax I, Riva G, Herlitz J, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, Nordberg P, et al.

Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med.

2015 Jun 11;372(24):2307–15.

76. Patil KD, Halperin HR, Becker LB. Cardiac arrest: resuscitation and reperfusion. Circ

Res. 2015 Jun 5;116(12):2041–9.

77. Neumar RW, Eigel B, Callaway CW, Estes NAM, Jollis JG, Kleinman ME, et al.

American Heart Association Response to the 2015 Institute of Medicine Report on

Strategies to Improve Cardiac Arrest Survival. Circulation. 2015 Sep 15;132(11):1049–

70.

78. Link MS, Atkins DL, Passman RS, Halperin HR, Samson RA, White RD, et al. Part 6:

electrical therapies: automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion, and

pacing: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary

Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18

Suppl 3):S706-719.

79. Chan PS, Krumholz HM, Nichol G, Nallamothu BK, American Heart Association

National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. Delayed time to

defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):9–17.

73
80. Page RL, Joglar JA, Kowal RC, Zagrodzky JD, Nelson LL, Ramaswamy K, et al. Use of

automated external defibrillators by a U.S. airline. N Engl J Med. 2000 Oct

26;343(17):1210–6.

81. Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Nichol G, Clark LL, Spaite DW, Hardman RG. Outcomes of

rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. N Engl J Med.

2000 Oct 26;343(17):1206–9.

82. Cummins RO, Ornato JP, Thies WH, Pepe PE. Improving survival from sudden cardiac

arrest: the “chain of survival” concept. A statement for health professionals from the

Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the Emergency Cardiac Care

Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1991 May;83(5):1832–47.

83. Dahan B, Jabre P, Karam N, Misslin R, Bories M, Tafflet M, et al. Optimization of

automated external defibrillator deployment outdoors: An evidence-based approach.

Resuscitation. 2016;108:68–74.

84. Hansen CM, Wissenberg M, Weeke P, Ruwald MH, Lamberts M, Lippert FK, et al.

Automated external defibrillators inaccessible to more than half of nearby cardiac arrests

in public locations during evening, nighttime, and weekends. Circulation. 2013 Nov

12;128(20):2224–31.

85. Noc M, Fajadet J, Lassen JF, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Olivecrona GK, et al. Invasive

coronary treatment strategies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a consensus statement

from the European association for percutaneous cardiovascular interventions

(EAPCI)/stent for life (SFL) groups. EuroIntervention J Eur Collab Work Group Interv

Cardiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2014 May;10(1):31–7.

86. Chan PS, Berg RA, Tang Y, Curtis LH, Spertus JA, American Heart Association’s Get

With the Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators. Association Between Therapeutic

74
Hypothermia and Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. JAMA. 2016 Oct

4;316(13):1375–82.

87. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, et al.

Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced

hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):557–63.

88. Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, Erlinge D, Gasche Y, Hassager C, et al. Targeted

temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013

Dec 5;369(23):2197–206.

89. Friberg H, Nielsen N. Therapeutic hypothermia and coronary angiography are

mandatory after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: No. Intensive Care Med. 2014

Jul;40(7):1030–2.

90. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to

improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb

21;346(8):549–56.

91. Larsen JM, Ravkilde J. Acute coronary angiography in patients resuscitated from out-of-

hospital cardiac arrest--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2012

Dec;83(12):1427–33.

92. Geri G, Dumas F, Bougouin W, Varenne O, Daviaud F, Pène F, et al. Immediate

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Associated With Improved Short- and Long-

Term Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015

Oct;8(10).

93. Bro-Jeppesen J, Kjaergaard J, Wanscher M, Pedersen F, Holmvang L, Lippert FK, et al.

Emergency coronary angiography in comatose cardiac arrest patients: do real-life

experiences support the guidelines? Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012

Dec;1(4):291–301.

75
94. Kitamura T, Kiyohara K, Sakai T, Matsuyama T, Hatakeyama T, Shimamoto T, et al.

Public-Access Defibrillation and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Japan. N Engl J

Med. 2016 Oct 27;375(17):1649–59.

95. Karam N, Narayanan K, Bougouin W, Benameur N, Beganton F, Jost D, et al. Major

regional differences in Automated External Defibrillator placement and Basic Life

Support training in France: Further needs for coordinated implementation. Resuscitation.

2017 Sep;118:49–54.

96. Herlitz J, Svensson L, Engdahl J, Silfverstolpe J. Characteristics and outcome in out-of-

hospital cardiac arrest when patients are found in a non-shockable rhythm. Resuscitation.

2008 Jan;76(1):31–6.

97. Abe T, Tokuda Y, Ishimatsu S, SOS-KANTO study group. Predictors for good cerebral

performance among adult survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2009

Apr;80(4):431–6.

98. McNally B, Robb R, Mehta M, Vellano K, Valderrama AL, Yoon PW, et al. Out-of-

hospital cardiac arrest surveillance --- Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival

(CARES), United States, October 1, 2005--December 31, 2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

Surveill Summ Wash DC 2002. 2011 Jul 29;60(8):1–19.

99. Herlitz J, Aune S, Bång A, Fredriksson M, Thorén A-B, Ekström L, et al. Very high

survival among patients defibrillated at an early stage after in-hospital ventricular

fibrillation on wards with and without monitoring facilities. Resuscitation. 2005

Aug;66(2):159–66.

100. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, et al. Prophylactic

implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection

fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877–83.

76
101. Chugh SS. Early identification of risk factors for sudden cardiac death. Nat Rev Cardiol.

2010 Jun;7(6):318.

102. Narayanan K, Reinier K, Uy-Evanado A, Teodorescu C, Chugh H, Marijon E, et al.

Frequency and determinants of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deployment among

primary prevention candidates with subsequent sudden cardiac arrest in the community.

Circulation. 2013;128:1733–8.

103. Chugh SS, Reinier K, Singh T, Uy-Evanado A, Socoteanu C, Peters D, et al.

Determinants of prolonged QT interval and their contribution to sudden death risk in

coronary artery disease: the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. Circulation. 2009

Feb 10;119(5):663–70.

104. Lemmert ME, de Jong JSSG, van Stipdonk AMW, Crijns HJGM, Wellens HJJ, Krucoff

MW, et al. Electrocardiographic factors playing a role in ischemic ventricular fibrillation

in ST elevation myocardial infarction are related to the culprit artery. Heart Rhythm Off

J Heart Rhythm Soc. 2008 Jan;5(1):71–8.

105. Jouven X, Schwartz PJ, Escolano S, Straczek C, Tafflet M, Desnos M, et al. Excessive

heart rate increase during mild mental stress in preparation for exercise predicts sudden

death in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul;30(14):1703–10.

106. Jouven X, Desnos M, Guerot C, Ducimetière P. Predicting sudden death in the

population: the Paris Prospective Study I. Circulation. 1999 Apr 20;99(15):1978–83.

107. Friedlander Y, Siscovick DS, Weinmann S, Austin MA, Psaty BM, Lemaitre RN, et al.

Family History as a Risk Factor for Primary Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 1998 Jan

20;97(2):155–60.

108. Lemaitre RN, Johnson CO, Hesselson S, Sotoodehnia N, Sotoodhenia N, McKnight B,

et al. Common variation in fatty acid metabolic genes and risk of incident sudden cardiac

arrest. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):471–7.

77
109. Albert CM, MacRae CA, Chasman DI, VanDenburgh M, Buring JE, Manson JE, et al.

Common variants in cardiac ion channel genes are associated with sudden cardiac death.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun;3(3):222–9.

110. Deo R, Norby FL, Katz R, Sotoodehnia N, Adabag S, DeFilippi CR, et al. Development

and Validation of a Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction Model for the General Population.

Circulation. 2016 Sep 13;134(11):806–16.

111. Karam N, Narayanan K, Marijon E. Letter by Karam et al Regarding Article,

“Development and Validation of a Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction Model for the

General Population”. Circulation. 2017;135:e636–7.

112. Lettieri C, Savonitto S, De Servi S, Guagliumi G, Belli G, Repetto A, et al. Emergency

percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: early and medium-term outcome. Am

Heart J. 2009 Mar;157(3):569–575.e1.

113. Lim HS, Stub D, Ajani AE, Andrianopoulos N, Reid CM, Charter K, et al. Survival in

patients with myocardial infarction complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jun

20;166(2):425–30.

114. Demirel F, Rasoul S, Elvan A, Ottervanger JP, Dambrink J-HE, Gosselink ATM, et al.

Impact of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation in patients with ST-

elevation myocardial infarction admitted for primary percutaneous coronary

intervention: Impact of ventricular fibrillation in STEMI patients. Eur Heart J Acute

Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Feb;4(1):16–23.

115. Pleskot M, Babu A, Hazukova R, Stritecky J, Bis J, Matejka J, et al. Out-of-hospital

cardiac arrests in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarctions in the East

Bohemian region over the period 2002-2004. Cardiology. 2008;109(1):41–51.

78
116. Zanuttini D, Armellini I, Nucifora G, Grillo MT, Morocutti G, Carchietti E, et al.

Predictive value of electrocardiogram in diagnosing acute coronary artery lesions among

patients with out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest. Resuscitation. 2013 Sep;84(9):1250–4.

117. Bougouin W, Lamhaut L, Marijon E, Jost D, Dumas F, Deye N, et al. Characteristics

and prognosis of sudden cardiac death in greater Paris. Intensive Care Med.

2014;40:846–54.

118. de Jong JSSG, Marsman RF, Henriques JPS, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Tanck MWT, et

al. Prognosis among survivors of primary ventricular fibrillation in the percutaneous

coronary intervention era. Am Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):467–72.

119. Gheeraert PJ, Henriques JP, De Buyzere ML, Voet J, Calle P, Taeymans Y, et al. Out-

of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: coronary

angiographic determinants. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jan;35(1):144–50.

120. Killip T, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two

year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Oct;20(4):457–64.

121. Khot UN, Jia G, Moliterno DJ, Lincoff AM, Khot MB, Harrington RA, et al. Prognostic

importance of physical examination for heart failure in non-ST-elevation acute coronary

syndromes: the enduring value of Killip classification. JAMA. 2003 Oct

22;290(16):2174–81.

122. Piccini JP, Berger JS, Brown DL. Early sustained ventricular arrhythmias complicating

acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2008 Sep;121(9):797–804.

123. Siudak Z, Birkemeyer R, Dziewierz A, Rakowski T, Zmudka K, Dubiel JS, et al. Out-of-

hospital cardiac arrest in patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI. Long-term follow

up data from EUROTRANSFER registry. Resuscitation. 2012 Mar;83(3):303–6.

124. Gheeraert PJ, De Buyzere ML, Taeymans YM, Gillebert TC, Henriques JPS, De Backer

G, et al. Risk factors for primary ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial

79
infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(21):2499–

510.

125. Pokorný J, Staněk V, Vrána M. Sudden cardiac death thirty years ago and at present. The

role of autonomic disturbances in acute myocardial infarction revisited. Physiol Res

Acad Sci Bohemoslov. 2011;60(5):715–28.

126. Chiriboga D, Yarzebski J, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS. Temporal trends (1975

through 1990) in the incidence and case-fatality rates of primary ventricular fibrillation

complicating acute myocardial infarction. A communitywide perspective. Circulation.

1994 Mar;89(3):998–1003.

127. Dekker LRC, Bezzina CR, Henriques JPS, Tanck MW, Koch KT, Alings MW, et al.

Familial sudden death is an important risk factor for primary ventricular fibrillation: a

case-control study in acute myocardial infarction patients. Circulation. 2006 Sep

12;114(11):1140–5.

128. Jabbari R, Engstrøm T, Glinge C, Risgaard B, Jabbari J, Winkel BG, et al. Incidence and

risk factors of ventricular fibrillation before primary angioplasty in patients with first

ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a nationwide study in Denmark. J Am Heart Assoc.

2015 Jan;4(1):e001399.

129. Bezzina CR, Pazoki R, Bardai A, Marsman RF, de Jong JSSG, Blom MT, et al.

Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus at 21q21 for ventricular

fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2010 Aug;42(8):688–91.

130. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016

European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth

Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on

Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of

10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the

80
European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur

Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315–81.

131. Ravingerová T, Stetka R, Pancza D, Ulicná O, Ziegelhöffer A, Styk J. Susceptibility to

ischemia-induced arrhythmias and the effect of preconditioning in the diabetic rat heart.

Physiol Res Acad Sci Bohemoslov. 2000;49(5):607–16.

132. de Marchi SF, Gloekler S, Meier P, Traupe T, Steck H, Cook S, et al. Determinants of

preformed collateral vessels in the human heart without coronary artery disease.

Cardiology. 2011;118(3):198–206.

81
Appendix: Summary in French

1. Introduction

La mort subite constitue un problème majeur de santé publique avec plus de 40 000 cas par an

en France, constituant environ la moitié des décès d’origine cardiovasculaire. Malgré les

investissements majeurs visant à améliorer leur prise en charge et leur pronostic, la mortalité

des arrêts cardiaques reste élevée et la survie en sortie d’hôpital dépasse rarement les 10%.

L’arrêt cardiaque et la maladie coronaire sont étroitement liés. D'une part, la vaste

majorité des arrêts cardiaques sont d'origine coronaire (≥75% des cas). D'autre part, avec les

progrès dans la prise en charge hospitalière de l'infarctus du myocarde, l’arrêt cardiaque pré-

hospitalier est devenue le principal mode de décès de l'infarctus du myocarde. L’intrication

entre l’infarctus du myocarde et l’arrêt cardiaque rend leurs pronostics étroitement liés. En

vue d’améliorer le pronostic de ces deux entités, une meilleure analyse des points communs et

des relations existant entre elles est donc indispensable.

Utilisant les données de 2 registres prospectifs, le registre francilien du Centre

d’Expertise Mort Subite qui inclue tous les arrêts cardiaques survenant à Paris et en Petite

Couronne depuis 2011, et le registre e-MUST qui inclue tous les infarctus du myocarde pris

en charge par le SAMU en Ile de France depuis 2003, nous avons analysé dans la première

partie de la thèse les déterminants majeurs du pronostic des arrêts cardiaques. Dans la 2ème

partie, nous avons identifié les facteurs associés à un risque accru d’arrêt cardiaque à la phase

aiguë de l’infarctus du myocarde, afin d’anticiper sa survenue et optimiser sa prise en charge

initiale.

82
2. Chapitre 1 : Impact de l’Horaire de Survenue sur le Pronostic des Arrêts Cardiaques

2.1. Introduction

Les infarctus du myocarde survenant durant les heures non ouvrables (fin de semaine, jours

fériés et nuits) ont une mortalité accrue par rapport aux infarctus du myocarde survenant

pendant les heures ouvrables. L’impact de l’horaire de survenue sur le pronostic de la mort

subite n’a pas encore été complètement élucidé. A travers une analyse des données du registre

francilien du Centre d’Expertise Mort Subite (CEMS) entre mai 2011 et mai 2014, nous avons

comparé les caractéristiques et le pronostic des morts subites selon leur horaire de survenue.

2.2. Méthodes

Initié en mai 2011, le registre francilien du CEMS collecte de façon prospective tous les arrêts

cardiaques extrahospitaliers survenant à Paris et en Petite Couronne et pris en charge par les

services de secours (le Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente (SAMU) et la Brigade des Sapeurs-

Pompiers (BSPP)). Il couvre ainsi une surface totale de 762 km2 avec 6.6 million d’habitants

(10% de la population française).

Les patients sont inclus dans le registre grâce à 2 méthodes : passive et active. D’une

part, pour chaque arrêt cardiaque pris en charge par les services de secours, des fiches sont

envoyées systématiquement par le SAMU et la BSPP. Cette première approche est complétée

par une recherche informatique systématique afin de déceler tous les cas d’arrêts cardiaque

non signalés. Enfin, un contrôle régulier est effectué dans des unités de soins intensifs afin de

vérifier l’exhaustivité des inclusions qui est de 98.6%. Le suivi des patients est par la suite

continué jusqu’à leur décès ou jusqu’à leur sortie d’hôpital.

83
Les données sont collectées d’après les recommandations d’Utstein pour les registres

d’arrêt cardiaque. Elles comportent des informations sur les caractéristiques, la prise en

charge et le pronostic des arrêts cardiaques. Dans le cadre de cette étude, les arrêts survenant

en dehors des heures ouvrables ont été définis comme des arrêts cardiaques survenus entre

18h et 8h, pendant le weekend ou pendant des jours fériés.

Les caractéristiques, la prise en charge et le pronostic des patients ont été comparés en

fonction de leur horaire de survenue. Les variables continues ont été rapportées sous forme de

moyennes (écart-type) et comparées en fonction des horaires de survenue grâce à un test de

student t. Les variables qualitatives ont été rapportées sous forme de proportions et comparées

grâce à des tests de Chi2. Un modèle de régression logistique a été utilisé pour estimer l’Odds

Ratio et l’intervalle de confiance à 95% de l’association entre l’horaire de survenue et la

survie en sortie d’hôpital. La log linéarité des variables a été testées et les variables pour

lesquelles la log linéarité n’a pas été confirmée ont été converties en variables catégorielles.

Les données ont été analysées à l’INSERM, Unité 970, Epidémiologie Cardiovasculaire et

Mort Subite en utilisant le logiciel R, version 3.1.2.

2.3. Résultats

Durant la période d’étude, 9834 cas de mort subite ont été enregistrés (moyenne d’âge 70.3

+/- 17ans, 62.1% d’hommes). Parmi eux, 6239 (63.4%) sont survenus en dehors des heures

ouvrables.

En dehors des heures ouvrables, les arrêts cardiaque ont plus souvent eu lieu au

domicile (84.5% vs. 73.8%, P<0.0001); des témoins étaient plus souvent présents (74.4% vs.

72.1%, P=0.01) mais ont moins fréquemment réalisé un massage cardiaque externe (48.4%

vs. 52.1%, P=0.001) et utilisé les défibrillateurs automatiques externes (1.6% vs. 2.9%,

P=0.01). Le délai entre l’appel des services de secours et leur arrivée était le même dans les 2

84
groupes (10mn en moyenne); à leur arrivée, les patient étaient moins souvent en rythme

choquable (16.3% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001) et un rythme spontané a moins souvent été obtenu

(27.5% vs. 31.1%, P<0.0001). La survie jusqu’à l’admission à l’hôpital était plus faible en

dehors des heures ouvrables (21.0% vs.24.5%, P<0.0001).

Il n’y avait pas de différence dans la prise en charge intra-hospitalière en fonction de

l’horaire de survenue, en termes de taux de coronarographie, d’angioplastie et d’hypothermie

thérapeutique.

La survie en sortie d’hôpital était plus faible en heures non ouvrables (4.7% vs. 6.5%,

P<0.0001). En analyse univariée, les variables associées à une meilleure survie étaient la

survenue en lieu public (OR 6.33, IC à 95% 5.28–7.59, P<0.0001), le sexe masculin (OR

1.88, IC à 95% 1.54–2.31, P<0.0001), la présence de témoins (OR 7.97, IC à 95% 5.40–

12.37, P<0.0001), le massage cardiaque par les témoins (OR 13.01, IC à 95% 8.78–20.27,

P<0.0001), et l’utilisation des défibrillateurs automatiques externes par les témoins (OR

47.65, 95% CI 26.32–87.25, P<0.0001), alors que l’âge avancé (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95–0.96,

P<0.0001) et la survenue en dehors des heures ouvrables (OR0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.85,

P=0.0002) étaient associés à une survie plus faible.

Après ajustement sur l’horaire de survenue, l’âge, le sexe, le rythme initial, le massage

cardiaque par le témoin et la localisation de l’arrêt cardiaque, il n’y avait pas de différence en

termes de survie des arrêts cardiaques en fonction de l’horaire de survenue (OR 0.85, IC à

95% 0.69–1.06, P=0.15).

2.4. Discussion

Dans cette étude sur 9834 arrêts cardiaques, 2/3 des cas sont survenus en dehors des heures

ouvrables. Leur survie était inférieure à celle des arrêts cardiaques survenant en heures

ouvrables (jusqu’à 30%), en raison essentiellement d'une prise en charge initiale moins
85
optimale par le témoin en termes de massage cardiaque et de défibrillation externe, alors que

les prises en charge spécialisées pré- et intra-hospitalière ne sont pas être influencées par

l'horaire de survenue.

Malgré quelques études analysant la différence de survie et de prise en charge

extrahospitalière des arrêts cardiaques en fonction de leur horaire de survenue, peu de

données existent concernant la prise en charge par les services de secours et en intra-

hospitalier. Les données fournies dans cette étude montrent que seule la prise en charge

initiale par les témoins diffère en fonction des horaires, alors que la prise en charge

spécialisée n’est pas influencée. Cependant, la mortalité des arrêts cardiaques survenant en

dehors des heures ouvrables est moins bonne que celles des arrêts en heure ouvrable, montrant

l’influence majeure de la prise en charge immédiate des arrêts cardiaques sur leur pronostic.

Une des limites de cette étude est que seules les données intrahospitalière relatives à

l’utilisation de la coronarographie, de l’angioplastie et de l’hypothermie thérapeutique ont été

incluses dans l’analyse ; d’autres variables auraient pu être décrites mais nous nous sommes

limitées aux variables ayant le plus d’impact prouvé sur la survie. Par ailleurs, cette étude a

été menée à Paris et en Petite Couronne et il est possible que des résultats différents soient

obtenus dans d’autres régions.

2.5. Conclusion

Le pronostic des arrêts cardiaques survenant en heures non ouvrables est moins favorable que

celui des arrêts cardiaques survenant en heure ouvrable, en raison d’une prise en charge

initiale sous-optimale, et malgré une prise en charge similaire par les services de secours et

par l’hôpital. Ceci souligne le rôle capital des premières minutes de la prise en charge des

arrêts cardiaques, qui devraient être la cible des futurs efforts visant à améliorer le pronostic

des arrêts cardiaques.

86
3. Chapitre 2 : Identification des Patients à Haut Risque d’Arrêt Cardiaque Pré-

Hospitalier à la Phase Aiguë de l’Infarctus du Myocarde

3.1. Introduction

Etant donné l’importance majeure des premières minutes de la prise en charge des arrêts

cardiaques démontrée dans la première partie de la thèse, la deuxième partie a eu pour objectif

d'identifier, parmi les victimes d’infarctus du myocarde incluses dans le registre e-MUST,

celles à risque de présenter une mort subite pré-hospitalière, afin de planifier la prise en

charge de l'arrêt cardiaque juste avant sa survenue en vue d'une meilleure réanimation initiale.

3.2. Méthodes

Le registre e-MUST a été créé en 2003 par l’ARSIF (Agence Régionale de Santé d’Ile de

France). Il inclue de façon prospective tous les infarctus du myocarde survenant en

extrahospitalier et pris en charge par le SAMU. Les patients sont inclus s’ils sont vivants à

l’arrivée du SAMU, présentant un angor depuis au moins 20mn et de moins de 24h, résistant à

la trinitrine et avec un sus-décalage du segment ST ≥ 2mm dans 2 dérivations contiguës en

précordial ou une dérivation sur les dérivations périphériques, ou BBG présumé récent.

Les données collectées concernent l’âge des patients, leur sexe, leurs antécédents

médicaux, leur symptomatologie actuelle, la prise en charge par le SAMU et à l’hôpital (avec

une attention particulière sur les délais d’intervention et de transport). Le type et le pronostic

de l’infarctus sont également renseignés. La collecte de ces données est débutée au téléphone

par le régulateur et complétée par l’équipe du SAMU sur place et par un appel systématique à

l’hôpital visant à obtenir le pronostic en sortie d’hôpital. Elles sont par la suite rentrées dans

une base informatique dans chaque centre puis envoyées au centre des registres de l’ARSIF

87
tous les 4 mois. Un audit externe annuel est réalisé sur 11% des fichiers afin de vérifier

l’exhaustivité du registre qui est de 92%.

Un modèle de régression multivariée prédicteur de l’arrêt cardiaque a été construit en

utilisant les variables associées à un risque accru d’arrêt cardiaque. Par la suite, la population

a été divisée en un échantillon de dérivation (2/3 de la population) et un échantillon de

validation interne (1/3) ; une validation externe a également été réalisée sur une population

similaire en Haute Savoie. Un score de prédiction de l’arrêt cardiaque a été créé selon les

résultats du modèle multivarié. Un poids a été attribué à chaque prédicteur d’arrêt cardiaque

en multipliant son coefficient beta par 10 et arrondissant au chiffre complet le plus proche ; le

score individuel est donc obtenu en additionnant le poids de ces variables. Les scores médians

des individus ayant présenté un arrêt cardiaque ou pas ont été comparés en utilisant le test de

Kruskal-Wallis. Quatre groupes de score ont été créés et dans chaque groupe, le taux observé

et le taux prédit d’arrêt cardiaque ont été calculés. Les performances du score (aire sous la

courbe, sensibilité, spécificité et rapport de probabilité) ont été estimées pour chaque classe de

score. Les analyses statistiques ont été réalisées en utilisant un logiciel STATA version 11.0

(STATA Corp, College Station, TX).

3.3 Résultats

Entre janvier 2006 et décembre 2010, 8112 patients présentant un infarctus du myocarde ont

été pris en charge par le SAMU et inclus dans le registre e-MUST (médiane d'âge 60ans, 78%

d'hommes).

Comparé aux patients qui n'ont pas présenté d'arrêt cardiaque, les patients ayant

présenté un arrêt cardiaque étaient plus jeune (60ans vs. 57ans, P<0.001). Le diabète,

l'hypertension et l'obésité étaient moins fréquents dans le groupe arrêt cardiaque (9.2% vs.

15.4%, 30.3% vs. 40.5%, and 16.6% vs. 25.3%, respectivement; tous les P<0.001), alors que

88
l'essoufflement était plus souvent présent avant l'arrêt cardiaque (19.4% vs. 2.7%; P<0.001).

Le délai médian entre le début de douleur et l'appel des services de secours était plus court

dans le groupe arrêt cardiaque (34 minutes vs. 63 minutes, P<0.001). Il n'y avait pas de

différence significative en termes de fréquence de dyslipidémie, de tabagisme et d'histoire

personnelle ou familiale de coronaropathie dans les 2 groupes.

Les caractéristiques de base des échantillons de dérivation et de validation étaient

similaires. En analyse univariée, l'âge jeune, l'absence de diabète, d'hypertension et d'obésité,

ainsi que la présence d'un essoufflement et d'un délai court entre le début de douleur et l'appel

des secours. En analyse multivariée, l'âge jeune, l'absence de diabète et d'obésité, la dyspnée,

et un délai court entre le début de douleur et l'appel des secours étaient des prédicteurs

indépendants d'arrêt cardiaque, sans interaction entre eux. L'aire sous la courbe dans

l'échantillon de dérivation était de 0.72 (IC à 95% 0.68–0.77).

Le score médian établi à travers ce modèle était de 18 (IC 13–23) dans la population

générale, 23 (IC 18-28) parmi les patients ayant présenté un arrêt cardiaque et 18 (13-23)

parmi le reste de la population. Le taux d'arrêt cardiaque augmentait avec le score, allant de

1.6% dans la tranche la plus basse à 28.9% dans la tranche à haut risque. Le rapport de risque

passait à 18 chez les patients ayant un score supérieur ≥30. Dans la population de validation

externe (606 patients), l'incidence d'arrêts cardiaques était de 6.4%, augmentant également

avec la tranche de score étudiée. L'aire sous la courbe était de 0.7033 dans l'échantillon de

validation interne et 0.6031 dans l'échantillon de validation externe.

3.4. Discussion

Dans cette étude incluant 8112 infarctus du myocarde, nous avons identifié 5 facteurs associés

à un risque accru d’arrêt cardiaque pré-hospitalier (âge jeune, absence de diabète et d'obésité,

dyspnée, délai court entre le début de douleur et l'appel des secours). Nous avons ainsi créé un

89
score de risque de mort subite que nous avons validé en interne (tiers de la population) et en

externe (population similaire en Haute-Savoie).

Le recours à un score de prédiction du risque d’arrêt cardiaque à la phase aiguë de

l’infarctus permettrait de révolutionner sa prise en charge en l’adaptant au risque estimé.

Ainsi, quoiqu’un délai de 90 minutes (ou 60 minutes pour les infarctus précoces) soit autorisé

avant la revascularisation, une revascularisation plus précoce, y compris par thrombolyse,

pourrait être envisagée en cas de risque élevé d’arrêt cardiaque. L’équipe hospitalière

(anesthésistes, réanimateurs et chirurgiens capables de poser une assistance extracorporelle)

pourrait aussi être avertie de l’arrivée d’un patient à haut risque. L'intérêt de ces stratégies

reste clairement à tester dans des études prospectives randomisées.

Plusieurs limites méritent d’être soulignées. Les patients présentant un arrêt cardiaque

avant l’arrivée du SAMU ne sont pas inclus dans ce registre à cause du manque de fiabilité du

sus-décalage de ST en post-arrêt cardiaque pour le diagnostic de l’infarctus du myocarde. Par

ailleurs, le score aurait probablement pu être amélioré en rajoutant des variables spécifiques à

l’arrêt cardiaque comme les antécédents de mort subite dans la famille et de syncope;

cependant, il s’agirait de poser des questions qui ne sont pas systématiquement posées par le

SAMU lors d’un appel pour douleur thoracique et qui risqueraient de compliquer la tâche du

régulateur. Enfin, en dépit de la validation externe du score, son application en dehors des

zones étudiées et avec des services de secours différents reste à prouver.

3.5. Conclusion

A la phase aiguë de l’infarctus du myocarde, l’arrêt cardiaque peut être prédit grâce à un score

simple, facile à obtenir au téléphone par le régulateur du service de secours. L’usage de ce

score permettrait aux services de secours d’estimer rapidement le risque individuel d’arrêt

cardiaque et d’organiser la prise en charge des infarctus du myocarde en fonction. Il

90
permettrait également d’anticiper l’arrêt cardiaque dans les cas à haut risque et de planifier sa

prise en charge avant même sa survenue.

91
4. Discussion

Parmi 9834 arrêts cardiaques dans la population générale à Paris et en Petite Couronne, la

survie en sortie d'hôpital était de 5.4%, avec un taux encore plus bas en dehors des heures

ouvrables suite à une prise en charge initiale moins optimale par les témoins, alors que la prise

en charge médicalisée en revanche, parmi les arrêts cardiaques survenant en présence des

services de secours à la phase aiguë de l'infarctus du myocarde, la survie était de 64%. Ces

résultats soulignent l'intérêt majeur des premières minutes de la prise en charge des arrêts

cardiaques. En vue d'améliorer la prise en charge initiale des arrêts cardiaques en anticipant

leur survenue, nous avons testé et validé la possibilité de créer un score prédictif de l'arrêt

cardiaque dans l'infarctus du myocarde.

La survie des arrêts cardiaques reste faible en dépit des efforts considérables visant à

améliorer leur pronostic. Deux méthodes ont été utilisées jusque-là dans ce but. D'une part, la

ressuscitation, avec pour but d'améliorer la prise en charge des arrêts cardiaques une fois

survenus. Elle se divise en une phase hospitalière, reposant essentiellement sur la

coronarographie et l'hypothermie thérapeutique; cette phase est limitée par le fait qu'elle ne

concerne que les patients admis vivants. Dans le registre du CEMS, la prise en charge

identique en intrahospitalier n'a pas permis de rattraper la différence de survie constatée à

l'arrivée à l'hôpital en fonction de l'horaire de survenue de l'arrêt cardiaque, montrant

l'importance majeure de la prise en charge initiale. La 2ème phase de la ressuscitation concerne

la prise en charge initiale extrahospitalière et repose essentiellement sur le massage cardiaque

externe et l'utilisation des défibrillateurs automatiques externes. La principale limite à cette

phase est le délai écoulé avant l'initiation de la réanimation et la présence inconstante d'un

témoin formé à la ressuscitation et d'un défibrillateur automatique externe à disposition. En

92
comparant la survie dans les 2 registres (e-MUST et CEMS), nous constatons une survie 10

fois plus élevée dans le registre e-MUST. Bien que l'origine ischémique soit généralement

associée à une meilleure survie, la différence entre les 2 survies est probablement due à la

présence du SAMU au moment des arrêts cardiaques dans e-MUST, permettant une prise en

charge optimale et immédiate, contrairement au registre du CEMS.

La 2ème méthode visant à diminuer l'impact de la mort subite est la prévention, ayant

pour but de détecter les personnes à haut risque d'arrêt cardiaque au moyen et long terme;

Plusieurs prédicteurs d'arrêt cardiaque ont été explorés, avec la fraction d'éjection du

ventricule gauche considérée comme le principal prédicteur du risque. Cependant, ce

marqueur a une sensibilité, une spécificité et une valeur prédictive faibles dans la prédiction

de la mort subite et est reconnu comme un outil imparfait. D'autres marqueurs ont également

été explorés, dont l'histoire familiale de mort subite, les facteurs génétiques et la fréquence

cardiaque élevée. Des scores ont aussi été créés, combinant les facteurs de risque afin de

fournir une estimation du risque de mort subite. Cependant, la prévention reste limitée par sa

faible spécificité dans la prédiction du risque individuel d'arrêt cardiaque, et dans l'estimation

du délai de sa potentielle survenue. Le score e-MUST a permis d'établir une estimation du

risque de mort subite imminente à travers 5 facteurs de risque faciles à obtenir par le

régulateur des services de secours au téléphone. L'utilisation de ce score permettrait ainsi de

guider la prise en charge des infarctus du myocarde selon leur risque d'arrêt cardiaque, avec

une anticipation de la survenue d'arrêt cardiaque et une programmation de sa prise en charge

initiale à l'avance.

Etant données la faible survie persistante des arrêts cardiaques et les limitations des

stratégies actuelles visant à diminuer son impact en termes de santé publique, de nouvelles

approches semblent nécessaires. L'anticipation ou prévention subaiguë serait une solution

possible, en permettant d'identifier un risque élevé d'arrêt cardiaque chez un individu donné,

93
quelques minutes avant sa survenue, permettant ainsi d'optimiser la prise en charge initiale en

l'organisant à l'avance.

5. Conclusion

La survie globale des arrêts cardiaques à Paris et en Petite Couronne reste extrêmement faible

(5.4%), surtout en dehors des heures ouvrables, suite à une prise en charge sous-optimale par

les témoins et en dépit d'une prise en charge similaire par le SAMU et en intra-hospitalier.

Ceci démontre l'importance majeure des premières minutes de la prise en charge des arrêts

cardiaques sur leur pronostic. Cette constatation est renforcée par la survie 10 fois plus élevée

observée dans le cadre des arrêts cardiaques survenant en présence du SAMU à la phase aiguë

de l'infarctus.

Grâce à cinq prédicteurs simples d'arrêt cardiaque dans le cadre de l'infarctus du

myocarde, nous avons pu créer un score de risque permettant d'identifier les patients à haut

risque d'arrêt cardiaque. Quoique l'optimisation de ce score reste encore possible, il ouvre une

piste prometteuse pour l'amélioration des arrêts cardiaques de l'impact en termes de santé

publique grâce à une nouvelle qui serait l'anticipation.

94

You might also like