Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dre C
Dre C
Dre C
The land was eventually inherited in shares by the sons and grandsons.
The system took were various forms such as Zamindari, Jagirdari, Inamdari, etc.
It is said that the British introduced Zamindari system to achieve two objectives.
First, it helped in regular collection of land revenue from a few persons i.e. Zamindars.
Secondly, it created a class of people who would remain loyal to the British ruler in the country.
(a) landlord (khalis) - Zamindari Khalis tenure of a village where whole ownership belongs to one
(b) communal (mushtaraka) - when land partitioned it becomes mushtarak- e Zamindari Be-ili-imal
pattidari tenure - Page 76, Para 138
Patti in Punjabi means a share as well as partnership and pattiddr is a shareholder, co-sharer or partner .
In pattidari the owners belonged to the same family and partitioned the lands among the branches of the
family. In the pattidari tenure, each share was regulated by the revenue payable
pattidari was meant to cover cases in which land was divided and held ‘in severalty’ by different proprietors
according to ancestral or customary shares
The assets that were held jointly were referred to as Shamilat of the village. (Common Land)
(a) perfect (mukammil) - When the common lands were completely partitioned it changed the tenure of
the village from an imperfect tenure type to a perfect one in the eyes and terminology of the revenue
collectors
(b) imperfect (na-mukammil) - Common land is not partitioned
bhaichara tenure - Page 76, Para 139
In bhaiachara unrelated families held land and paid the revenue jointly according to the share of the land they
held in the village. in the bhaichara tenure the revenue payable regulated the share
The assets that were held jointly were referred to as Shamilat of the village. (Common Land)
(a) perfect (mukammil) - When the common lands were completely partitioned it changed the tenure of
the village from an imperfect tenure type to a perfect one in the eyes and terminology of the revenue
collectors
(b) imperfect (na-mukammil) - Common land is not partitioned
2
Survey deals with villages as a whole, mapping their The cadasral survey marks on the village
boundaries and showing the main topographical features, map the boundaries of every field, and by
such as the homestead or abadi, roads, turable, and barren means of it the areas shown in the jamabandi
2 land have also sometimes been indicated. are calculated.
as a convenient way of distinguishing it from the annual record,‖ an amended edition of the record of rights
prepared such estate yearly or at such intervals as the Financial Commissioner may prescribe, in which all
changes which have occurred since the standing record was framed are, or should be incorporated (section
33).
Definitions
The rates charged for irrigation purposes are called “water rates” (abiana) or
Abiana
“occupier’s rates”
(paragraph 61) An assessment levied in addition to the assessment at unirrigated rates on account
of the advantage derived from Irrigation (paragraph 61).
In the framework of revenue administration, the owner of the source of
irrigation was generally called adna malik and was distinguished from the owner of
the land called a’ala malik. The adna malik paid a small sum to the a’ala malik as
haqq-i-zamindari in acknowledgment of the latter’s right over the waste. His right
was ‘superior’ to that of the chakdar’s only in the sense that the zamindar was the
owner of all the wasteland, and if the chakdar abandoned his share, it reverted to the
original proprietor or zamindar.
Adna malik Since land in this dry tract was useless without water, the adna malik became
proprietor of half of the irrigated land, took half of the proprietor’s share of the
produce, and paid half of the land revenue which was fixed on the well according to
its capacity for irrigation. His ‘full’ proprietary right was underlined by the fact that
this right was transferable, and the original proprietor or the a ’ ala-malik who
received haqq-i-zamindari for the newly irrigated land, could cultivate it in the
chakdar’s share only as his tenant . Inferior owner - zamindars
Banjar-Jadid if for four successive harvests land which was once cultivated has not bean
sown it is culled as Jadid or new fallow (for full explanation see paragraph 276).
Banjar-kadim If it continues to be uncultivated, this entry should be maintained for the next four
harvests, after which the land will pass into the category of Kadim or old
fallow. Kadim also includes cultivable waste. (for full explanation see
paragraph 267).
Chahi chahi-watered from wells. The term is sometimes sketched so as to include
irrigation from jhalars erected on the bank of a stream.
Chakota Lump grain rent or rent consisting of a fixed amount of grain in the rabi, and
a fixed amount of cash in the kharif harvest (see, paragraph 312).
Dakar Stiff clay soil.
Dastun-ulAmal Hand book for the guidance of district revenue officers in carrying out the
provisions of the settlement.
Ghairmumkin The term Ghair Mumkin is reserved for barren land. lands under buildings,
roads, streams, canals, etc., and barren sand (ret) or kalar should be entered as
Ghairmumkin,
Jamabandi Jamabandi is Record of Rights (ROR) of a village. The Jamabandi Register contains name of
owners, area of land, shares of owners and other Rights.
Khasra List of fields, field register.
Khatauni A list of holdings of tenants. Holdings slips prepared at re-measurement (see
Appendix VII).
Marusi Permanent Tenant Cultivator who pays revenue to the land
owner. - Occupancy tenant.
Mutation Mutation is the change of title ownership from one person to another when the property
is sold or transferred. By mutating a property, the new owner gets the property recorded
on his name in the land revenue department and the
government is able to charge property tax from the rightful owner
Naksha-Intikal Statement of land transfers.
Pachotra Pg 488, A surcharge of 5 percent, on the revenue paid to village headmen.
definition
7
LAND REVENUE
Land revenue is tax or revenue levied on agricultural production on land. It is either collected as a
percentage of the share of total crop or a monetary value is fixed on the land to be paid by the farmer.
It has been the major source of revenue for government.
Deputy commissioner responsible for collection of land revenue and local rate.
He acquainted numerous inventive procedures to boost the finance. He sorted out a new revenue setup and
settled the levies on the land under cultivation in keeping view the way of yields grown. (Steedman, 1882)
Following four methods for accumulation of revenue were utilized.
Jinsi or Batai:
As per this setup, crop was separated into various parts and an irregular quantity was fixed for each part. It
was a
standard technique for a share in the product at a rate which was changed by the state on the basis of the
value or richness of the
land. Its normal quantity was one-third to one-fourth of the gross yield. If the resident cultivated more than
the standard region
attached to one well then the settled sum was put aside and the entire of the harvest was separated by the
Batai framework.
(Banga, 1978)
Naqadi- Jinsi:
It was Sawan Mal's initial measure in accomplishing money kind assessment, by which the landlord
obtained the Government share at a fixed amount. To his standing instructions, the Kardar was to dispatch
the Nirkhnama (timetable of rates) of all grains of the season appropriately marked by the Panches and the
Zamindars. These rates differed from one area to other, however were usually a little higher than those
predominant in the regional market. (Banga, 1978) Sometimes, another distinct
strategy for evaluation was utilized for wells. Particularly on the outskirts of the present Lodhran and
Multan, was to take a specific aggregate of Rs. 2 or 3 per yoke cattle being used on the wells. (Fagan,
1900)
Zabti:
In Multan, Diwan enforced a money deposit on specific yields and the production of which could not stand
the postponement of division or be assessed accurately. This money evaluation was known as Zabti Jama
and such harvests were called Zabti crops. This technique for appraisal of money was connected to the
unpreserved crops like sugarcane, tobacco, pepper, cotton, indigo, heart beats, oilseeds, vegetables and the
spring feed. (Purser, 1892) In the surroundings of Multan, the income was normally taken in shape of
kinds, since grain was essential for the court and the troops. In the remaining areas, the
Mahsool was given back to the cultivators, who were gratified to get it from Government at a rate which
was generally 25 percent over the market cost. (O'Brien, 1882) Under this system, the rate of land income
differed for various products as well.
They differed in accordance with the efficiency of the soil, nature of products, methods for water system
and some other facilities. The most fruitful and positively arranged lands with irrigational services were
measured as high as 50% of gross produce, while the State share on fewer prolific and gloomily arranged
land shifted from one-third to two-fifths. (Trevaskis, 1928) 50% of the gross product was somewhat
phenomenal and intermittent in Multan, where the Government share differed
frequently from one seventh to one third of the gross product. (Maclagan, Punjab District Gazetteer of
Multan 1923-24, 1926)
According to Sita Ram Kohli:
In province of Multan, a peculiar sort of tenure known as the Chakdari tenure was revailing at that time.
(Kohli, Land Revenue Administration under Maharaja Ranjit Singh, 1929)
Correspondingly, where the proprietor did not cultivate the land, the Diwan conceded licenses to the people
other than the proprietor to sink wells and win the benefit for themselves paying just an ostensible lease to
the proprietor through the State.
The cultivators were really evaluated by their ability to pay. (Douie, 1899)
Korari:
It is a kind of single amount evaluation, where the landholder had himself given method for cultivation or
wells without state help, a settled appraisal in cash was assessed under a deed, which postulated the
Governmental share as a rule at 12 rupees for every well. This strategy for the gathering of income was
called Korari-i-Chahat and these wells were known as Chahat-iIkrari.
9
Dimension of Killa
The actual size of the killa is of minor importance, and it differs according to the size of the square or
rectangle of which it is always the twenty-fifth part.
of their estates and need no longer be defrauded by their tenants. In the same way where land revenue and
occupiers rates are recovered under a fluctuating system the assessee can at once check the charges
demanded from him, however deficient his education, and cannot be imposed upon by a corrupt official
Limitation of killabandi.- AT the start it was a difficult matter to persuade the owners of old established
proprietary estates to change their hereditary holdings and system of cultivation. This has, however, been
completed with success in Shahpur, throughout the Gujranwala District in the canal irrigated areas of
Sialkot, Gujrat and Montgomery and is (1929) being carried out in certain parts of the Ferozepore and
Lahore Districts. Where irrigation is being extended for the first time it is now the policy of Government to
insist on Killabandi as a condition of irrigation, and this policy is justified by the success of killabandi in
Gujranwala and by the satisfaction with which the people have accepted it. Elsewhere it is not possible to
insist upon the change, nor if possible would it ordinarily be desirable. Where for example the population
is heavy, land valuable and holdings small, the amount of dislocation caused by the change would
outweigh its ultimate advantages int he eyes of the people. For this reason the attempt to introduce the
system by consent in Karnal had to be abandoned. It is, however, possible that even in unirrigated estates,
where holdings are large and land less valuable, owners will in time becomes so convinced of its
advantages as to adopt the changes voluntarily.
188. Second way of dealing with waste to acknowledge that it belongs to the
people, but reserve certain trees.- In Kangra, as
we have seen, the State could properly have claimed the ownership of all the waste
with some unimportant exceptions. But the policy of the settlements in the plains
was unfortunately followed in dealing with an entirely different set of circumstances,
and the waste became village property except that the State‘s rights in certain valuable
kinds of trees were reserved. In Kulu the waste has been retained as the property of
the state, subject to rights of user enjoyed by the people.
189. Third way of dealing with waste to include and ample area in village boundaries and claim
the rest.- In the Western Punjab the villages cannot be said to have had any boundaries so far
as the waste was concerned. Boundaries were laid down at settlement in such a way as to
include in each estate an ample area of grazing land, and the rest of the waste was claimed
as the property of the State.† In some cases the liberality shown in these arrangements was
carried to excess. The extension of cultivation in the tracts in the west of the Punjab is only
possible by the development of canal irrigation at Government expense, and obviously when
the State is landlord as well as ruler, it has greater facilities for executing such improvements.
94. Village cesses.- All the cesses noticed above are charges for which landowners are liable.
But there is another class of cesses. Which they themselves sometimes realize from the other
residents in the village or from particular classes of residents, or from persons making use of
the village lands. These are called in the Land Revenue Act ―village cesses‖. It is convenient to
notice them here, but, strictly speaking, they should be described in the next chapter, which
deals with the rights of landowners. According to the interpretation clause village cess
―includes any cess, contribu on or due which is customarily leviable within an estate, and is
neither a payment for the use of private property or for personal service nor imposed by or
under any enactment for the time being in force‖; and sec on 145 (4) and (5) provide that ―
the Governor-General in Council may, on a reference from the local Government, declare
97. Cesses levied by Jagidars.- Where cesses of the kind noticed in the foregoing paragraphs are
levied by jagidars, the same consideration do not apply. Strictly speaking it is only where a jagirdar is
found to be in possession of some sort of superior proprietary title, that his right to levy cesses would
ordinarily be admissible. Few, if any, undecided cases can now remain. The question has been dealt
with in recent years in connection with the settlement of some of the Kangra jagirs and of the Jagir of
the Kathak Khan in Kohat.*
Possession or occupancy of lands, buildings, or other property by title, under a lease, or on payment of rent. The
period of a tenant's occupancy or possession. A habitation held or occupied by a tenant.
(c) failing male descendants and a widow, or, when a widow succeeds, then after her death or remarriage, or
in the event of her abandoning the land to agnates or male collateral relatives in the male line of
descent, provided that the common ancestor of the late tenant and the agnates occupied the land. Among
agnates the right of occupancy falls to the person or persons who would have inherited the land if it had been
owned by the deceased.
On failure of legal heirs the holding reverts to the landlord (section 59)
13
304. Objections to very small circles.- The plan of having very small circles is
undoubtedly open to criticism. It increases the labour of reporting assessment for
approval and of maintaining annual returns after settlement. It is liable to the more
serious objection that it prevents a Settlement Officer from taking a wide enough view
of his subject and encourages a mechanical application of rates without sufficient
regard to the circumstances of individual estates. The conclusions to be drawn from
statistics becomes more reliable when the area to which the figures relate is fairly
large, for in that case accidental and temporary aberrations on this side or that to great
extent neutralize one another.
195. Classes of tenants.- Tenants are usually considered to be of two kinds, occupancy tenants
and tenants at will. The vernacular equivalents are maurusi or hereditary, and ghair maurusi or
non hereditary.* An occupancy tenant has right to hold his land so long as he pays the rent
fixed by authority, and to pass it on to his decedents on he same terms. A tenant at will is a
tenants from year to year and his rent is determined by the agreement between him self and
his landlord. The status of the occupancy tenants depends on law whether statute or
customary the status of the tenants at will depends on contract, though certain stipulations, if
included in a contract of letting will be treated by the courts as invalid.† A more detailed and
precise classification of tenants is into.
1. occupancy tenants whose right are determined by the provisions of Act XVI of 1887.
2. tenants of Government lands whose tenancies have been created under Act V of 1912.
3. tenants for a fixed term exceeding one year under a contract or decree or order of a
competent authority. tenants from year to year
But even this classification cannot be regarded as quite exhaustive. It does not include the
mortgagor tenant whose fixity of tenure is secured by one of the statutory forms of mortgage
allowed by the Punjab Alienation of Land Act, XIII of 1900, or some of the local forms of
tenure referred to in paragraph 215 the position of the former is explained in the 41st
paragraph of the land Administration Manual.
60. Separation of land revenue and water revenue.- The groundwork of Mr. Prinsep‘s assessment
scheme was the separation of the assessment of land as such from the assessment of the additional
advantages accruing to the landowners from the supply of irrigation by his won exertions or at the cost
of the State. In the produce estimates framed under the instructions the crops entered were the actual
crops grown, but the outturn represented ―the average yield in ordinary unirrigated land for a year of
average rain‖ as ―ascertained form chaudhris, patwaris and others for each chakla (assessment circle)
separately.‖ This involved the absurdity of assuming unirrigated yields for certain crops which in some
of the tracts under assessment were never grown on unirrigated land. The produce was valued at the
average prices current in the past thirty years. Now that the half-assets rule had been adopted, Mr.
Prinsep held that one-sixth of the gross produce fairly represented the amount due to the State, and
instructed his subordinates to use this fraction in their estimates. But it may be doubted whether as
Settlement Commissioner he attached more importance to the produce estimate than he had done as
Settlement Officer of Sialkotwhen he described it as ―after all but an auxiliary jama‖ which
―answers the purpose for which it is required pretty fairly.‖ Plough estimates were framed and the
opinions of native officials and respectable landowners recorded. But Mr. Prinsep‘s Chief reliance
was on a very careful study of the past fiscal history and present resources, natural and acquired, of each
estimate and circle.
15
61. Well abiana and canal water-advantage rate.- The land being assessed in its unirrigated aspect,
he proposed to impose on each well as a small fixed sum, and on canal lands a light fluctuation land
revenue rate in addition to the water-rate and levied like it on the acreage actually watered. The
additional charge on account of irrigation was known as abiana or water-advantage rate or revenue,*
As regards the irrigated part of his assessment, Mr. Prinsep cannot be said to have formally abandoned
the half-net assets rule, but he practically did so. He arrived at the conclusion that one rupee an
acre was as much as the State could, justly claim as well abiana in the districts under settlement, and he
seems to have thought that this rate might properly be adopted throughout the province.
Starting from this assumption, the actual abiana in each circle was determined by the average area
served by an average well. In deciding what this was Mr. Prinsep fixed his attention on the amount
of the rainfall and the nearness or distance of water from the surface, dividing the country into rain
zones and zones of approximately equal water level. These two factors have of course a very marked
effect on the acreage watered by wells, but Mr. Prinsep regarded them too exclusively. He had no proper
crop returns by which to check his conclusions, and his estimates of the irrigating capacity of
wells were exceedingly moderate. The abiana throughout a circle was fixed at so many rupees per well.
The amount did not change from village to village, and it seems to have been part of the original scheme
that every well in an estate should pay an equal amount though this was not consistently carried out in
the distribution of the revenue over holdings.
62. Water-advantage rate not uniform.- The water-advantage rate on the Bari Doab Canal was not
uniform. It was Rs. 1-4-0 per acre near its head in the Pathankot tahsil of Gurdaspur, falling gradually
lower down till it reached twelve annas in Lahore. The plan of a fluctuating canal water-advantage rate
had the great merit of securing to the State a fair share of the profits arising from the rapid expansion of
Canal irrigation during the currency of his settlements. 63. Proposals regarding well abiana.- At first
Mr. Prinsep thought that the dry assessment and the well abiana would both be fixed in perpetuity in a
large number of estates. He admitted that his plan involved the surrender of a considerable amount of
revenue in some of the districts then under settlement, but he argued that Government would only be
giving up what it ought never to have taken, and that the loss would be confined to a few districts near
the hills in which the difference between chahi and barani rates exceeded one rupee. If the settlement
was made permanent and new wells were not assessed, some inequality would arise, but in view of the
lightness of the water-advantage revenue this was not a matter of great importance and in any case it
could be obviated by redistributing the abiana every five years over all wells at work. Many new wells
would be sunk, and in this way the abiana would become lighter and lighter. But, if Government was
not ready to accept for ever the reduction of revenue involved in his proposals, it could gradually be
recovered by assessing new wells with the circle abiana rate after a short period of exemption, the
abiana on wells falling out of use being remitted. When at last it was decided that a permanent
settlement should not be made Mr. Prinsep suggested that the well abiana might remain unchanged for
fifty years.
64. Well abiana system condemned.- His proposals were reported to Government, but for years no
orders were passed, and, when the system was finally condemned, it was too late to prevent its
application to the districts under Mr. Prinsep‘s supervision. But a resolution issued in 1872 (Department
of Agriculture, Revenue, and Commerce, No. 818, dated 14th June, 1872) forbade its adoption in
future settlements.
65. Objections to the system.- The objections brought against the scheme were as follows. It violates
the principle that the State is entitled to half the net assets. It involves much inequality, for under it
villages with good wells will be more lightly assessed that villages with poor wells. It will cause a loss
of revenue which in some districts, such as Jallandar, will be very serious. This loss is unnecessary, for
it is
16
446. Assessment of lands watered by perennial State canals.– There are thus now only two
systems of assessment of land revenue on lands watered by perennial canals. The first is the
fixed canal advantage rate on area commanded which has been imposed on the older canals –
the Western Jumna, Agra, Sirhind and Upper Bari Doab –and which is based on the cash rent
paid on such land. The difference between that rate and the corresponding rate for unirrigated
land is called the nahri parta, and is used for calculating during the settlements now current
(1) the new revenue payable on land made irrigable by canal extensions since settlement, and
(2) the revenue to be remitted on land from which canal irrigation has been withdrawn, by
remodeling operations or otherwise since settlement. The second is the purely fluctuating
assessment levied on the area sown on the newer canals, viz., the Lower Chenab and Lower
Jhelum Canal and the canals of the Triple Project. For those the fluctuating system is more
suitable for two reasons; (i) the assessable value of the land without irrigation is little or
nothing, and (ii) it is necessary on new canals that the engineers should have a free hand in
varying the distribution of water with extensions and improvements, and the simplest method
of allowing for variations in distribution is to have an entirely fluctuating assessment. It is
hoped that in time, when conditions of irrigation have become established, the fixed
assessment system in force on the older canals will be extended to the newer ones also.