Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U2103660 Sharvani Exp5
U2103660 Sharvani Exp5
Experiment No: 5
Title: Separation of Chloride and Bromide by Ion Exchange
Chromatography
Name: Sharvani A/P Karthigesu
Matric number: U2103660/1
Name of Partners: 1. Low Ru Yi
2. Nur Eillia Shuhada Binti Ab Rahman
Date: 15/11/2022
Title
Objective
Preparation of Column
20g of resin was washed with distilled water followed by HNO3 and then packed in
the column as shown in figure 1.
The column was washed with HNO3 until the washing was free from chloride ions.
Silver nitrate test was done on the eluent collected and no precipitate was formed
which indicates that all the chloride ion have been washed off. It is shown in figure 2.
Figure 2: Eluent of HNO3 forming no precipitation
Then, sodium nitrate solution was passed through the column. The effluent collected
was used to determine the blank.
Blank Determination
10cm3 of the effluent (0.30 mol dm-3 sodium nitrate) with added 2 drops of potassium
chromate as an indicator was titrated against standard silver nitrate solution that has
been diluted ten times. Table 1 shows the volume of diluted siver nitrate used for blank
titration.
1
Volume of standard silver nitrate used: 10 × 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑
= 0.194 mL
Therefore, for blank, we can see that 0.194ml of standard silver nitrate is required to
form silver chromate, Ag2CrO4. The end-point is determined when the colour of analyte
changes from yellow to red brown which indicates the formation of silver chromate.
After the solution of sodium chloride and potassium bromide added to the
column, 10ml of the effluent was titrated against standard silver nitrate solution with
potassium chromate as the indicator. A white precipitate is also formed together with
the colour change to red brown at the end point which indicates the formation of silver
halide. Table 2 shows the volume of standard silver nitrate used for titration against
10ml of effluent for the separation of chloride and bromide.
Table 2: Volume of standard silver nitrate used for titration against 10ml of effluent
for the separation of chloride and bromide.
Number
Volume of
of moles
Volume Initial Final standard Volume oh Concentrat
of burette burette silver of halide halide ion of
effluent reading reading nitrate reacted/ exist halide
/mL /mL /mL used/mL mL / mmol / mmol L-1
10 2.60 4.20 1.60 1.41 0.0703 7.03
20 4.20 8.40 4.20 4.01 0.2003 20.03
30 9.59 14.30 4.71 4.52 0.2258 22.58
40 14.40 22.50 8.10 7.91 0.3953 39.53
50 22.50 32.10 9.60 9.41 0.4703 47.03
60 32.10 39.20 7.10 6.91 0.3453 34.53
70 0.90 4.50 3.60 3.41 0.1703 17.03
80 4.50 8.40 3.90 3.71 0.1853 18.53
90 8.60 13.55 4.95 4.76 0.2378 23.78
100 14.20 19.45 5.25 5.06 0.2528 25.28
110 19.45 24.75 5.30 5.11 0.2553 25.53
120 19.88 23.95 4.07 3.88 0.1938 19.38
130 23.95 26.90 2.95 2.76 0.1378 13.78
140 28.90 30.20 1.30 1.11 0.0553 5.53
150 30.20 31.10 0.90 0.71 0.0353 3.53
160 31.10 31.60 0.50 0.31 0.0153 1.53
The concentration of the chloride ions and bromide ions can be determined
respectively from the concentration of AgCI and AgBr represented by the following
equations:
Where,
From the results obtained in table 2, we can plot a graph as shown in figure 3 below.
Graph of concentration of halide against volume of
effluent Chloride ion
Bromide ion
concentration of halide/ mmol L-1 50.00
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Volume of effluent/mL
For chloride,
The number of mole of chloride collected from each effluent is shown in table 3.
The number of moles for first two readings are omitted as the flow rate was being
adjusted for the first 20 seconds. Therefore, the flow rate was unstable and the
number of moles of chloride exist is considered insignificant.
For effluent of volume 30ml to 70ml, the sum of number of moles of chloride
collected is 1.6070 mmol.
0.1003𝑔
= 58.443 𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙−1
= 0.001716 mol
= 1.716 mmol
Thus,
1.607 𝑚𝑚𝑜𝑙
Percentage of Cl- ions recovered = x 100%
1.716 𝑚𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 93.65%
For bromide,
The number of mole of bromide collected from each effluent is shown in table 4.
0.2070𝑔
= 119.002 𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙−1
= 0.001739 mol
= 1.739 mmol
Thus,
1.369 𝑚𝑚𝑜𝑙
Percentage of Br- ions recovered = x 100%
1.739 𝑚𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 78.72%
The anion exchange resin are generally in the chloride form, but is converted into the
nitrate form by washing with sodium nitrate solution represented by the following
equation:
𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐧 − 𝐂𝐈 + 𝐍𝐎𝟑− ⟶ 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐧 − 𝐍𝐎𝟑 + 𝐂𝐈 −
Concentrated nitrate ion will shift the equilibrium to the right while the chloride ion will
be replaced and eluted from the column. This is due to the concentration difference
between the nitrate ions and chloride ions. Separation is possible as bromide ion is
adsorbed stronger than the chloride ion because the equilibrium constant for Bromide
ion is higher than that of chloride ion. This causes the chloride ion to be eluted through
the column faster than bromide ions.
The ions were not 100% recovered from the column because a few errors occurred
while conducting this experiment. First of all, the flow rate of the column was not
maintained at 1cm3 per minute throughout the whole elution period. It was being
adjusted for the first 20 seconds and towards the end of the elution, the flow rate was
slightly increased due to time constraint. This could have been the reason why only
78.72% bromide ion was recovered as complete separation was not attained. Next,
sodium nitrate solution was poured a little quickly into the column which disrupted the
surface of column which was packed uniformly. The end point of the titration was also
overshoot at some points which could have caused inaccuracy in the results.
Therefore, a few precautions shall be taken when conducting this experiment. We
should always maintain the flow rate at 1cm3 per minute. The resin column should also
be packed uniformly with no air bubbles in the resin bed. The column should not be
left to dry. Next, while adding any solution into the column, a dropper should be used
or the solution should be poured in slowly to prevent the resin bed from being
disrupted. To avoid, overshooting, we should put a white paper below the conical flask
to observe the colour changes more clearly. The 10cm3 of effluent collected should be
titrated one by one and should not be mixed up.
Conclusions
The chromatographic separation of chloride ion and bromide ion from known amount
of chloride and bromide salt is successfully demonstrated. It is shown by the two
peaks observed on the graph of concentration of halide against volume of effluent.
The percentage of chloride ions recovered was 93.65% and the percentage of
bromide ion recovered was 78.72%.
2. Name the stationary phase and mobile phase used in this experiment.
Stationary phase: The resin-nitrate slurry
Mobile phase: Sodium nitrate solution
References
Ahern, K., & Rajagopal, I. (2021, December 26). 3.4.3. Ion Exchange
Chromatography. Chemistry LibreTexts. Retrieved November 21, 2022, from
https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/University_of_Arkansas_Little_Rock/CHEM
_4320_5320%3A_Biochemistry_1/03%3A_Methods_of_Protein_Purification_a
nd_Characterization/3.4%3A_Chromatography/3.4.3._Ion_Exchange_Chromat
ography