Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revision Matrix
Revision Matrix
Revision Matrix
Psychology and
climate science, as
two prominent
WP1: This essay
Allison: The other disciplines within the
aims to analyze
major revision to realm of football,
the distinctions This change
make is in the exhibit significant
between the makes the thesis
thesis. Right now distinctions in terms
disciplines of statement more
it doesn't fully of subject matter,
psychology and concrete and
represent your methodologies, tones,
climate science in complete. More
argument about the purposes, and scopes.
football, focusing conclusive details
difference between These variations
on their respective are added.
the disciplines; be highlight the unique
scholarly
more specific. characteristics of
communities.
their respective
scholarly
communities.
WP1: Drawing
attention to the
differences
between top-tier The main focus of the
clubs like Arsenal, essay is “examining
Allison:
with a Waste
sometimes it could waste management
Recycling Center practices and then to Replacing the
use moire
diverting tons of original texts with
examples and even calculate the
waste from estimated landfill direct quote,
direct quotes to
landfills, and making my
fully illustrate your waste GHG
lower-tier clubs emissions from eight argument stronger
claims
with less football tiers in and more
developed England (Tier 3 - Tier conjunctive
environmental 10)”.
strategies, the
research estimates
the the amount of
waste produced at
the various
football tiers in
As the article
navigates through
different football tiers
in England, from the
Premier League to
lower leagues, it
concludes the waste
management
practices within
WP1: As the football clubs: “Total
article navigates waste generated at
through different Allison:
football tiers in sometimes it could football clubs during Adding direct
use moire 2012/13 season
England, from the ranged from about 2 quote to the text,
Premier League to examples and even making my
direct quotes to tonnes to 345 tonnes.
lower leagues, it argument stronger
demonstrates the fully illustrate your Annual number of and more
claims spectators at the club
varying waste level ranged from 931 conjunctive
management spectators to 114,494.
practices within The waste per
football clubs. spectator ranged from
1.82 kg/spectator to
6.81 kg/spectator;
mean waste per
spectator was 3.27
kg. The total number
of spectators during
2012/13 season was
9,162,067.”
Climate science relies
on extensive data for
drawing conclusions,
whereas psychology
employs a narrative
process for result
acquisition. In
psychology,
interviews and
observational studies
are primary methods, Adding a
Allison: explain paragraph
what ethnology tell while climate science analyzing the how
us about the scholars utilize
WP1:\ surveys and data methodology
disciplines similar and differs
collection. Although
both disciplines in these two
incorporate disciplines.
interviewing
methods, psychology
researchers analyze
conversations,
whereas climate
science scholars
examines the factual
basis behind the data.
When comparing the
scope of climate
science research to
psychology, it's
evident that climate
science encompasses
a broader range, often
targeting entire
countries or global
phenomena, given the
universal nature of
climate issues. In
contrast, psychology
tends to focus on Adding a
smaller groups or paragraph
communities, explaining the
conducting deep characteristic of
Allison: explain
these two
what scopes tell us analyses to uncover
WP1:\ phenomena or disciplines on the
about the
problems within these angle of scopes.
disciplines
specific contexts. Making the essay
While climate science more complete
addresses large-scale, with more
global challenges, analysis.
psychology provides
insights into more
localized human
behavior and
experiences, offering
detailed
understandings of
community dynamics
and psychological
phenomena within
smaller groups.
Credits: Dosumu et
Adding the
al., “Greenhouse Gas
Classmate: The citation as
Emissions:
WP2:/ blog missing footnotes to the
Contributions Made
citations. text, increasing its
by Football Clubs in
validity.
England”
The mean waste per
WP2:The mean spectator? Hold on to
waste per your hats – it's 3.27
spectator? Hold on kg! That adds up to
to your hats – it's Allison: it's not an unbelievable
3.27 kg! That adds apparent to the Highlighting some
number —
up to an reader that it's a of the key data,
30,146,000 kg of
unbelievable blog on the first making the
waste across the eight
number — read translation more
football tiers. A more
30,146,000 kg of like a blog.
detailed graph of gas
waste across the emissions from waste
eight football tiers. to landfill is shown
below:
Allison: The
reflection answers
the questions Adding the estimate
posed, but you reading time, date
could expand on Making the format
and author in the
WP2:/ the visual and of text fits the
beginning of the blog.
formatting blog.
And decide the texts
conventions of in various sections
blogs.