Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PFRS 16 - Leases
PFRS 16 - Leases
Workshop
City Sports Club Cebu
Cardinal Rosales Ave., Cebu City
13 September 2019
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
Session Agenda
Overview
► Issued on 13 January 2016.
What changes can we expect?
► Replaces all previous PFRS provisions
on lease accounting (PAS 17, SIC 15,
SIC 27 and IFRIC 4). • The lessee will be required to
► Result of a joint project with FASB, recognize
2020
the majority of
which for its part issued new guidance leases in its balance sheet,
on lease accounting on 25 February apart from some exemptions.
2016. However, as the IASB and the
FASB reached different decisions in • Lessor
2019
accounting will remain
some areas as the project progressed, essentially unchanged.
differences still exist.
► Effective for annual periods beginning • Disclosure1requirements will
on or after 1 January 2019. 20 8
increase significantly.
The lessee has the option to not recognize these leases on the balance sheet.
The related lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term or
another systematic basis.
Fact Pattern
Analysis
► The lessee can apply the portfolio approach to each master agreement since the
individual leases within the master agreements are similar to each other.
RIGHT-OF-USE ASSET
LESSOR LESSEE
LEASE PAYMENTS
Definition of a lease
Explicitly or implicitly
identified in the
contract
Identified Asset
• An asset is typically identified by being explicitly
Explicitly or implicitly specified in a contract.
identified in the
contract • However, an asset can also be identified by being
implicitly specified at the time that the asset is made
available for use by the customer. For example, asset
cannot be identified at contract date but is identifiable
at the start of the lease.
Physically distinct
No substantive
substitution rights
Identified Asset
A capacity portion of an asset can be an identified asset if:
Explicitly or implicitly
identified in the • it is physically distinct (for example, a floor of a building);
contract or
No substantive
substitution rights
Identified Asset
A supplier’s substitution right is ‘substantive’ only if the
Explicitly or implicitly supplier both:
identified in the
contract 1. Has the practical ability to substitute alternative assets
throughout the period of use*; and
Yes
Customer Supplier
Who has the right to direct how and
for what purpose the asset is used?
Neither
No
Yes No
Did the customer design the asset?
Determination at Inception
Subsequent Reassessment
• A change in the terms and conditions of a contract does not include the
exercise of an option (e.g., renewal option) or failure to exercise an option
that is included in the contract.
Fact Pattern
► Entity A enters into a five-year contract with Supplier Y for the use of a rolling stock
specifically designed for Entity A.
► The rolling stock is designed to transport materials used in Entity A’s production
process and is not suitable for use by other customers.
► The rolling stock is not explicitly specified in the contract, but Supplier Y owns only
one rolling stock that is suitable for Entity A’s use. If the rolling stock does not operate
properly, the contract requires Supplier Y to repair or replace the rolling stock.
Analysis
► The rolling stock is an identified asset. While the rolling stock is not explicitly
specified in the contract (e.g., by serial number), it is implicitly specified because
Supplier Y owns only one rolling stock suitable for Entity A’s use and therefore it is
implicitly identified.
Fact Pattern
► Entity A enters into a five-year contract with Supplier Y for the use of a car. The
specification of the car is specified in the contract (brand, type, color, options, etc.).
At inception of the contract the car is not yet built.
Analysis
► The car is an identified asset. Although the car cannot be identified at inception of
the contract, it is apparent that it will be identifiable at the commencement of the
lease. The car is identified by being implicitly specified at the time that it is made
available for use by the customer (i.e., at the commencement date).
Fact Pattern
► Entity A enters into a 12-year contract with Supplier Y for the right to use three fibres
within a fibre optic cable between Area 1 and Area 2. The contract identifies three of
the cable’s 20 fibres for use by Entity A. The three fibres are dedicated solely to
Entity A’s data for the duration of the contract term.
Analysis
► The three fibres are identified assets because they are physically distinct and
explicitly specified in the contract.
Fact Pattern
► Scenario A
► Entity A enters into a five-year contract with Supplier Y for the right to transport
oil from Country A to Country B through Supplier Y’s pipeline. The contract
provides that Entity A will have the right to use of 95% of the pipeline’s capacity
throughout the term of the arrangement.
Analysis
► The capacity portion of the pipeline is an identified asset. While 95% of the pipeline’s
capacity is not physically distinct from the remaining capacity of the pipeline, it
represents substantially all of the capacity of the entire pipeline and thereby provides
Entity A with the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of
the pipeline.
Fact Pattern
► Scenario B
► Assume the same facts as in Scenario A, except that Entity A has the right to
use 60% of the pipeline’s capacity throughout the term of the arrangement
Analysis
► The capacity portion of the pipeline is not an identified asset because 60% of the
pipeline’s capacity is less than substantially all of the capacity of the pipeline. Entity A
does not have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use
of the pipeline.
Fact Pattern
Analysis
► Although the amount of space Customer uses is specified in the contract, there is no
identified asset. The contract is for space in the airport, and this space can change at
the discretion of Supplier.
Fact Pattern
► Entity A owns a large warehouse that can be subdivided into numerous subsections
by inserting removable walls. It leases out different portions of storage space to its
customers based on their respective needs. Entity B contracts with Entity A to reserve
1,000 square feet of space to store its inventory for a three-year period.
► However, Entity A has the right to shift Entity B’s inventory to another location within
its warehouse at its discretion, as long as it is 1,000 square feet.
Analysis
► No. The asset is not identified because Entity A has a substantive substitution
right. Entity A has agreed to provide a specific level of capacity within its warehouse
but has the unilateral right to relocate entity B’s inventory and can do so without
significant cost.
Fact Pattern
► Entity A enters into a contract with Supplier Y to use a vehicle for a three-year period.
The vehicle is identified in the contract. Supplier Y cannot substitute another vehicle
unless the specified vehicle is not operational (e.g., it breaks down).
Analysis
► Yes. Entity A (lessee) has the right to direct the use of the identified vehicle
throughout the period of use.
► Entity A (lessee) has the right to direct the use of the vehicle because it has the right
to control the use of the vehicle, when or whether the vehicle is used, where the
vehicle goes and what the vehicle is used for.
► Supplier Y’s (lessor) limits on certain uses for the vehicle and modifications to it are
considered protective rights that define the scope of Entity A’s use of the asset but do
not affect the assessment of whether Entity A directs the use of the asset.
Fact Pattern
► Lessee obtains the right to place an oil pipeline in underground space for 20 years in
exchange for consideration.
► The contract specifies the exact location and dimensions (path, width and depth) of
the underground space within which the pipeline will be placed.
► The landowner retains the right to use the surface of the land above the pipeline, but
it has no right to access or otherwise change the use of the specified underground
space throughout the 20-year period of use.
► Lessee has the right to perform inspection, repairs and maintenance work (including
replacing damaged sections of the pipeline when necessary).
Paper, toner,
Inspection
inspection
20%
80%
► Lessees
► Allocate consideration on the basis of the relative stand-alone price
► If an observable stand-alone price is not readily available, the stand-alone price is
estimated
► Maximize the use of observable information
► Apply estimation methods in a consistent manner
► Lessors allocate consideration in accordance with the provisions of PFRS 15
Fact Pattern
► Scenario A
► A lessee enters into a three-year lease of equipment, with fixed annual
payments of CU12,000. The contract itemizes the fixed annual payments as
follows: CU9,000 for rent, CU2,500 for maintenance and CU500 of
administrative tasks.
Analysis
► The contract contains two components – one lease component (lease of
equipment) and a non-lease component (maintenance). The amount paid for
administrative tasks does not transfer a good or service to the lessee. Therefore, the
total consideration in the contract of CU36,000 will be allocated to the lease
component (equipment) and the non-lease component (maintenance).
Fact Pattern
► Scenario A
► Assume the fact pattern as in scenario A except that, in addition, the contract
requires the lessee to pay for the restoration of the equipment to its original
condition.
Analysis
► The contract still contains two components – one lease component (lease of
equipment) and a non-lease component (maintenance). Similar to the amount
paid for administrative tasks, the restoration does not transfer a good or service to
the lessee as it is only performed at the end of the lease term. Therefore, the total
consideration in the contract will be allocated to the lease component (equipment)
and the non-lease component (maintenance).
Parking lot
Storage space
• Contracts may contain rights to use several assets (e.g., storage space and parking lot)
• Rights to use individual assets must be accounted for separately when:
• Benefits can be obtained from the use of the underlying asset (either individually or
collectively with other resources); and
• The underlying asset is neither highly dependent nor highly interrelated with other
underlying assets in the contract
Fact Pattern
► Scenario A
► Assume that a lessee enters into a lease of an excavator and the related
accessories (e.g., excavator attachments) that are used for mining purposes.
The lessee is a local mining company that intends to use the excavator at a
copper mine.
Analysis
► From the perspective of the lessee, the contract contains one lease component. The
lessee would be unable to benefit from the use of the excavator without also using
the accessories. Therefore, the excavator is dependent upon the accessories.
Fact Pattern
► Scenario B
► Assume the same facts as in Scenario A, except that the contract also conveys
the right to use an additional loading truck. This loading truck could be deployed
by the lessee for other uses (e.g., to transport iron ores at another mine).
Analysis
► From the perspective of the lessee, the contract contains two lease components: a
lease of the excavator (together with the accessories) and a lease of the loading
truck. Because the loading truck could be deployed for other uses independent of the
excavator, the lessee can benefit from the loading truck on its own or together with
other readily available resources. The lessee can also benefit from the use of the
excavator on its own or together with other readily available resources.
• Lease Term
• Lease Payments
• Discount Rate
• Initial Direct Costs
Commencement date
► Reasonably certain
► Assessed at commencement date
► Consider all facts and circumstances that create an economic
incentive
► Including any expected changes in facts and circumstances
between the commencement date and until the exercise date
Fact Pattern
► Assume that Entity A enters into a lease for equipment that includes a non-
cancellable term of four years and a two-year market-priced renewal option of lessee.
There are no termination penalties or other factors indicating that Entity A is
reasonably certain to exercise the renewal portion.
Analysis
► At the lease commencement date, the lease term would be four years.
Fact Pattern
► Assume that Entity A enters into a lease for a building that includes a non-cancellable
term of four years renewable for another two yeas at market at option of lessee.
Before it takes possession of the building, Entity A pays for leasehold improvements.
The leasehold improvements are expected to have significant value at the end of four
years, and that value can only be realized through continued occupancy of the leased
property.
Analysis
► At lease commencement, Entity A determines that it is reasonably certain to exercise
the renewal option because it would suffer a significant economic penalty if it
abandoned the leasehold improvements at the end of the initial non-cancellable
period. Thus, at lease commencement, Entity A would conclude that the lease term
is six years.
Fact Pattern
► Assume that Entity A enters into a lease for an identified retail space in a shopping
center. The retail space will be available to Entity A for only the months of October,
November and December during a non-cancellable term of five years. The lessor
agrees to provide the same retail space for each of the five years.
Analysis
► At the lease commencement date, the lease term is fifteen months (three months
per year over the five annual periods specified in the contract).
Fact Pattern
► A lease contract has an initial non-cancellable period of one year and an extension
for an additional year if both the lessee and the lessor agree. There is no penalty for
either party if they do not agree to extend for the additional year.
Analysis
► The initial one-year non-cancellable period meets the definition of a contract because
it creates enforceable rights and obligations.
► However, the one-year extension period does not meet the definition of a
contract because both the lessee and the lessor could unilaterally elect to not
extend the arrangement without a more than insignificant penalty. That is, at
lease commencement, neither party has enforceable rights and obligations beyond
the initial non-cancellable period.
► Entity A (lessee) enters into an indefinite lease of land that can be terminated by
mutual agreement by both parties. There are no termination penalties to be paid by
any party on termination.
Analysis
► It depends. In the absence of any term, since this involves an indefinite lease of land,
par. B34 will be considered.
► “In determining the lease term and assessing the length of the non-cancellable period of a lease,
an entity shall apply the definition of a contract and determine the period for which the contract is
enforceable. A lease is no longer enforceable when the lessee and the lessor each has the right
to terminate the lease without permission from the other party with no more than an insignificant
penalty. If each party would suffer economically to exit the lease then there is likely some kind of
penalty to take into account and the contract would be enforceable on those follow on periods.”
► Will the answer change if the termination at no penalty stipulated in the contract can
be made anytime by any party?
Analysis
► It depends. There is a need to check the substance of the transaction and look into
the qualitative factors. Also, there is a need to assess the incentive of continuing or
not continuing the lease at point of view of lessee and lessor.
Lease Payments
Residual value
guarantees – Variable lease
Purchase
amounts Termination payments that
Fixed payments options*
expected to be option penalties* depend on an
(exercise price) payable index or rate
(lessees only)
Fact Pattern
► Entity A (lessee) enters into a lease and guarantees that the lessor will realize
CU15,000 from selling the asset to another party at the end of the lease. At lease
commencement, based on Entity A’s estimate of the residual value of the underlying
asset, Entity A determines that it expects that it will owe CU6,000 at the end of the
lease.
Analysis
► Because it is expected that it will owe the lessor CU6,000 under the residual value
guarantee, Entity A includes that amount as a lease payment.
Fact Pattern
► Assume that Entity A enters into a 10-year lease of property. The lease payment for
the first year is CU1,000. The lease payments are linked to the consumer price index
(CPI), i.e. not a floating interest rate. The CPI at the beginning of the first year is 100.
Lease payments are updated at the end of every second year. At the end of year one,
the CPI is 105. At the end of year two, the CPI is 108.
Analysis
► At the lease commencement date, the lease payments are CU1,000 per year for 10
years. Entity A does not take into consideration the potential future changes in the
index. At the end of year one the payments have not changed, so the liability is not
updated. At the end of year two, when the lease payments change, Entity A
updates the remaining eight lease payments to CU1,080 per year (CU1,000 /
100 × 108) and does not change its discount rate to remeasure the lease
liability (and right-of-use asset).
Fact Pattern
Analysis
► There are two components in the arrangement, a lease of equipment and the
purchase of consumables.
► Even though Customer B may believe that it is highly unlikely to purchase fewer than
8,000 units of consumables every year, in this example, there are no lease payments
for purposes of initial measurement (Entity A and Customer B) and lease
classification (Entity A).
► Entity A and Customer B would allocate the payments associated with the future
payments to the lease and consumables component of the contract.
Discount Rate
• Rule: Interest rate implicit in the lease (IRR)
• If no IRR can be readily determined: Incremental borrowing rate (IBR)* (lessees only)
*The rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow over a similar term, and with a
similar security, the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to the right-of-use asset
in a similar economic environment.
• IRR = interest rate at which:
Operating leases –
Finance leases without Finance leases with
recognize IDCs as an
recognized selling recognized selling
expense over the lease
profit – include IDCs in profit – expense at lease
term on the same basis
net investment commencement
as lease income
Subsequent • Accrete the lease liability based on the effective interest method using
measurement of a discount rate determined at lease commencement2
lease liability • Reduce lease liability by payments made
Subsequent • Depreciate ROU asset based on PAS 16, Property, Plant and
Equipment (e.g., straight-line, double-declining, etc.)
measurement of ROU
• Alternative measurement of ROU asset under PAS 16 and
asset
PAS 40, Investment Property
1 Initial measurement of the ROU asset would also include the lessee’s initial direct costs (IDCs),
prepayments made to the lessor less lease incentives received from the lessor, if any, and restoration,
removal and dismantling costs.
2 As long as lease modifications are accounted for as a separate lease.
Present value of
Lease liability lease payments
Subsequent measurement
Discount
(-) payments made rate
(+) accretion of interest
(+/-) remeasurements
Present value of
Present value of Fair value of the Initial direct costs
unguaranteed
lease payments underlying asset of lessor
residual value
Subsequent measurement
(-) accumulated depreciation
Cost model
(-) impairment losses
(+/-) remeasurements of lease liability Fair value model in certain
OR
circumstances
Revaluation model in certain
OR
circumstances
Minimum
Lease
Payments
Amortization of ROU
Lease Term
STATEMENT OF STATEMENT OF
BALANCE SHEET
INCOME CASH FLOWS
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
NET INCOME BEFORE TAX
OPERATING EXPENSES
FINANCE COSTS
EBITDA
OPERATING PROFIT
OPERATING CASH FLOWS
FINANCING CASH FLOWS
Fact Pattern
► Uses incremental borrowing rate because rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily
determined
► Depreciates the right-of-use asset on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Analysis (1/2)
At commencement date:
Right-of-use asset CU33,000
Lease liability (CU33,000)
To initially recognize the right-of-use asset and lease liability
Year 1:
Interest expense CU1,398
Lease liability (CU1,398)
To record interest and accrete the lease liability using interest method (CU 33,000 x 4.235%)
Analysis (2/2)
► A summary of the accounting of the lease (assuming no changes due to
reassessment, lease modification or impairment) is as follow:
Income Statement
Depreciation CU11,000 CU11,000 CU11,000
Interest 1,398 1,033 569
Total periodic expense CU12,398 CU12,033 CU11,569
Balance Sheet
ROU asset CU33,000 CU22,000 CU11,000 CU‒
Lease liability (33,000) (24,398) (13,431) ‒
Fact Pattern
Analysis (1/6)
Analysis (2/6)
At commencement date:
Right-of-use asset CU405,391
Lease liability (CU355,391)
Cash (CU50,000)
To recognize initial lease payment for the 1st year, right-of-use asset and lease liability
Year 1:
Interest expense CU17,770
Lease liability (CU17,770)
To record interest and accrete the lease liability using interest method (CU355,391 x 5%)
Analysis (3/6)
Beginning of Year 2:
Lease liability CU50,000
Cash (CU50,000)
To recognize lease payment for 2nd year
Year 2:
Interest expense CU16,158
Lease liability (CU16,158)
To record interest and accrete the lease liability using interest method (17,770 + 355,391 = 373,161 -
50,000 = 323,161 x 5%)
Analysis (4/6)
► Accounting for the change in future lease payments on Year 3:
► Lease liability balance = CU339,319 (PV of 8 payments of CU50,000
discounted at the interest rate of 5% per annum = CU355,391 + CU33,928 –
CU50,000)
► CPI at commencement date = 125
► CPI at year 3 = 135
► Payment for the 3rd year should be adjusted for the change in CPI
= Annual lease payments on commencement date x (New CPI over Old CPI)
= CU50,000 × 135 ÷ 125
= CU54,000
► The entity re-measures the lease liability to reflect the revised lease payments of
CU54,000
Analysis (5/6)
Analysis (6/6)
► At the beginning of the third year, the entity re-measures the lease liability at the
PV of 8 payments of CU54,000 discounted at an unchanged discount rate of 5% per
annum.
Beginning of Year 3:
Right-of-use asset CU27,145
Lease liability (CU27,145)
To record remeasurement of lease liability
Subsequent measurement
• Finance leases - similar to today’s finance leases
• Recognize interest income on net investment, reduce net investment for
lease payments received (net of interest income)
• Recognize income for variable lease payments not included in net
investment
• Operating leases - similar to today’s operating leases
Fact Pattern
► Head lease - An intermediate lessor enters into a five-year lease for 5,000 square
meters of office space (the head lease) with Entity A (the head lessor).
► Sublease - At commencement of the head lease, the intermediate lessor subleases
the 5,000 square meters of office space for two years to a sublessee.
► The intermediate lessor classifies the sublease by reference to the right-of-use asset
arising from the head lease. The intermediate lessor classifies the sublease as an
operating lease.
Analysis
► When the intermediate lessor enters into the sublease, the intermediate lessor
retains the lease liability and the right-of-use asset relating to the head lease in its
statement of financial position.
► During the term of the sublease, the intermediate lessor:
► recognizes a depreciation charge for the right-of-use asset and interest on the
lease liability; and
► recognizes lease income from the sublease.
Fact Pattern
► Head lease - An intermediate lessor enters into a five-year lease for 5,000 square
meters of office space (the head lease) with Entity A (the head lessor).
► Sublease - At the beginning of Year 3, the intermediate lessor subleases the 5,000
square meters of office space for the remaining three years of the head lease to a
sublessee.
► The intermediate lessor classifies the sublease by reference to the right-of-use asset
arising from the head lease. The intermediate lessor classifies the sublease as a
finance lease.
Analysis
► When the intermediate lessor enters into the sublease, the intermediate lessor:
► derecognizes the right-of-use asset relating to the head lease that it transfers to
the sublessee and recognizes the net investment in the sublease;
► recognizes any difference between the right-of-use asset and the net
investment in the sublease in profit or loss; and
► retains the lease liability relating to the head lease in its statement of financial
position, which represents the lease payments owed to the head lessor.
PY CY
31 December 2018 31 December 2019
Option 1
Cumulative
catch-up
Full retrospective
As if PFRS 16 has always Contracts under new standard
applied
Contracts restated
Modified retrospective
Liability = PV lease
Cumulative catch-up
payments and ROU
either:
Option 2
54 A lessee shall provide the disclosures specified in paragraph 53 in a tabular format, unless
another format is more appropriate. The amounts disclosed shall include costs that a lessee has
included in the carrying amount of another asset during the reporting period.
(h)
(a)
(b)
(g)
(j)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
59 In addition to the disclosures required in paragraphs 53–58, a lessee shall disclose additional
qualitative and quantitative information about its leasing activities necessary to meet the disclosure
objective in paragraph 51 (as described in paragraph B48). This additional information may include,
but is not limited to, information that helps users of financial statements to assess:
a) the nature of the lessee’s leasing activities;
b) future cash outflows to which the lessee is potentially exposed that are not reflected in the
measurement of lease liabilities. This includes exposure arising from:
(i) variable lease payments (as described in paragraph B49);
(ii) extension options and termination options (as described in paragraph B50);
(iii) residual value guarantees (as described in paragraph B51); and
(iv) leases not yet commenced to which the lessee is committed.
c) restrictions or covenants imposed by leases; and
d) sale and leaseback transactions (as described in paragraph B52).
60 A lessee that accounts for short-term leases or leases of low-value assets applying paragraph 6
shall disclose that fact.
Illustrative example
PAS 17 PFRS 16
Definition of a A lease is an agreement whereby A lease is contract, or part of a
lease the lessor conveys to the lessee, in contract, that conveys the right to
return for a payment or series of control the use of an asset (the
payments, the right to use an asset underlying asset) for a period of
for an agreed period of time. time in exchange for consideration
► Not necessary for an set
arrangement to convey the right ► The right to control the
to control the use of an asset identified asset is conveyed to
to be in scope of PAS 17 the customer
Recognition Not applicable ► Short-term leases
exemptions for ► Lease of low-value assets
lessees
Lessee Dual model approach: Generally recognize all leases on
accounting asset balance sheet
► Operating lease (off balance
sheet)
► Finance lease (on balance
sheet)
PAS 17 PFRS 16
Lessor accounting Dual model approach Dual model approach (same as PAS
17)
Lease term More or less same with PFRS 16 More or less same with PAS 17
Lease payments - More or less same with PFRS 16 More or less same with PAS 17
lessees
Lease liability Not dealt with in PAS 17 Required when there is lease
reassessment - modification
lessees
Disclosure - Quantitative and qualitative More detailed disclosures including
lessees and disclosures are required, but the format of disclosure, are
lessors generally fewer disclosures are required
required than under PFRS 16
Tabular disclosure for amounts
required unless a more appropriate
type of disclosure is applicable
Practical expedients
Grandfather Lessees are able to ‘grandfather’ previous conclusions reached
under IFRIC 4 and PAS 17 as to whether contracts existing at
rule
transition are, or contain, leases, although this exemption must be
applied either for all contracts or none.
Short-term Optional lessee exemption for short-term leases – i.e. leases for
which the lease term as determined under the new standard is 12
leases
months or less (discussed in earlier slides)
IFRIC 4 / PAS 17
Lease?
Yes No
[Grandfathered]*
Discount Rate
• A company may apply a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with
reasonably similar characteristics.
• The practical expedient refers to leases with ‘a similar remaining lease
term’.
• The expedient is expected to provide cost savings to lessees and will not
have a significant effect on reported information.
• If a lessee chooses this practical expedient, the lessee shall adjust the
right-of-use asset at the date of initial application by the amount of any
provision for onerous leases recognised in the statement of financial
position immediately before the date of initial application.
• For a lessee that does not restate its comparative information, leases for
which the term ends within 12 months of the date of initial application are
very similar in effect to those captured by the short-term lease
exemption and thus similar considerations apply.
► Company A leases an equipment for use in its business for an annual rental of
CU100.
► The lease commenced on 1 January 2018 and includes a two-year noncancellable
period, renewable at Company A’s option for a further one year at the same rate.
► At commencement date, Company A assesses that it is reasonably certain to
exercise the renewal option and that the lease term is for three years.
► Upon adoption of PFRS 16, Company A elected to use the modified retrospective
approach.
► There is no change regarding Company A’s assessment of exercising the renewal
option.
► As of transition date (i.e., 1 January 2019), the remaining lease term is one year.
Analysis
► Company A may choose to:
► Apply the PFRS 16 model to the lease and recognize an ROU asset
(i.e., retrospectively or equal to the lease liability, using the same incremental
borrowing rate used to measure the lease liability) and a lease liability; or
► Use the practical expedient to account for the lease as a short term lease.
Use of hindsight
• A lessee may use hindsight, such as in determining the lease term if the
contract contains options to extend or terminate the lease.
• Permitting lessees to apply hindsight on transition to PFRS 16 will result in
useful information, particularly with respect to areas of judgement such as
the determination of lease term for contracts that contain options to extend
or terminate a lease.
Question:
How would a lessee account for any existing prepaid rent or rent
liability arising from straight-lining of an operating lease
under PAS 17?
Analysis
► The answer would depend on the transition approach elected by the lessee.
Question:
What kind of impairment test is a lessee expected to perform at
the date of initial application?
2
assets, which may include multiple right-of-use assets as
§
well as other assets.
Case objectives
► Apply the requirements of PFRS 16, specifically on the transition
approaches
► Evaluate the accounting consequences of each transition approaches
allowed by PFRS 16
► PFRS 16 will not affect the classification of lease contracts for tax purposes
► More likely affect the lessees’ accounting for income taxes rather than the
lessor’s
q Deductible expense
Ø Rent paid or accrued, including all expenses which under the terms
of the agreement the lessee is required to pay to, or for the account
of, the lessor
Ø Related expenses for accounting purposes may be different (e.g.,
depreciation expense and accretion expense)
Illustrative example
Fact Pattern:
An entity (lessee) enters into a lease agreement to which the recognition
exemptions in paragraphs 5-8 of PFRS 16 for short-term leases or for
leases for which the underlying asset is of low value do not apply. For tax
purposes, neither a right-of-use asset nor a lease liability is considered to
exist. Rather, lease payments are tax deductible on a straight-line basis
over the lease term or when paid.
Issue:
Does an entity (lessee) recognise deferred tax on the temporary
difference that arise from the initial recognition of the lease asset and
liability, if the lease payments are expensed for tax purposes on a
straight-line basis over the lease term or when paid?
Conclusion
Approach 1A:
Recognise deferred tax on initial recognition – consider asset and liability separately
Approach 1B:
Recognise deferred tax – consider asset and liability as in-substance linked to each other
Yes, the entity regards the right-of-use asset and the lease liability as a single item. On this basis,
the net asset or liability is compared to its tax base and deferred tax is recognised on that net
amount.
Approach 2:
Apply the IRE. The entity recognizes neither the deferred tax asset for the temporary difference
on the lease liability nor the corresponding deferred tax liability for the temporary difference on
the right-of-use asset.
Benjamin N. Villacorte
Partner, Financial Accounting Advisory Services
Benjie is a Partner in Assurance. He is PFRS/PFRS accredited based on EY/SGV requirements. He obtained his bachelor’s
degree in Accountancy from the San Beda College and place 3rd in the May 2004 CPA licensure examinations. He is also
Certified Internal Auditor and a member of PICPA.
Relevant experience
► Benjie has extensive experience in the audit and providing advisory services. His major clients are publicly-listed and
include companies in power distribution, power generation, real estate, retail operations, education institutions,
healthcare, telecommunications and semiconductor industries.
► He is a member of the Accounting Standards Group and specializes in issues dealing with revenue recognition, leases,
business combinations, impairment, intangible assets and provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.
► Benjie has handled audits of companies reporting under International Financial Reporting Standards, US GAAP and
SOX 404 audits of internal control over financial reporting
► He has also conducted various seminars for clients and regulators covering accounting standards (IFRS and PFRS) and
industry updates.
List of services
13 September 2019
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
FAAS Services
Managed Services
Contract structuring • Perform contract analysis and prepare an accounting • Identifying possible lease arrangements
memo for lease or other service contracts that may or
and analysis may not contain a lease
•
•
Ensuring compliance with new leasing standard
Readily available documentation for audit support
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
FAAS Services
Managed Services
Data • Perform data quality and integrity assessment • Highly reliable data quality and integrity
• Access to Client Lease Database • Error/ issue log with significance report
• Improved data capturing guidance
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
FAAS Services
Managed Services
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
FAAS Services
Accounting support on PFRS 16
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
FAAS Services
Accounting support on PFRS 16
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
Financial Accounting Advisory Services Partners
Aris C. Malantic
Partner, Financial Accounting Advisory Services
Bok is a partner at SGV & Co. and is the Leader of the ► He also led Treasury management engagements of corporates -
Financial Accounting Advisory Services sub-service line for review of treasury organization, liquidity and fund management,
ASEAN and Philippines. He obtained his bachelor’s degree working capital, among others and conducted lectures on IFRS with
in Accountancy from the University of Santo Tomas. He is a focus on the financial instruments standard (IAS 39, IAS 32, IFRS 7,
Certified Public Accountant and a member of PICPA. He is IFRS 9), IFRS 15 and IFRS 16
also a member of the EY Global FAAS Operations Board. ► He has extensive experience in the review of hedge accounting
treatment including reviews of hedge documentation and hedge
Relevant experience effectiveness test for banks and corporates (in various industries).
He also has extensive experience in corporate structuring, equity
► Bok has led various FAAS engagements related to restructuring, and valuation of financial instruments including debt,
Accounting Changes, Audit Remediation, Accounting Policy equity and plain vanilla derivative instruments.
Review, Transaction Accounting, Financial Reporting and ► He has also conducted business combination implementation
Financial Instruments. review of publicly listed banks and non-bank clients including step
► He led IFRS conversion engagements for various universal, acquisitions, reverse acquisitions and purchase price allocation
commercial, thrift, development, and rural banks and other reviews.
financial institutions such as investment houses, stock ► He has extensive experience on audits of local and multinational
brokerage houses, finance companies, and investment financial institutions (banks, investment house, stock brokerage) and
companies corporate and conglomerate entities across various industries –
banking and financial services, real estate, construction, toll road
operations, educational, hospital, retail manufacturing
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
Financial Accounting Advisory Services Partners
Benjamin N. Villacorte
Partner, Financial Accounting Advisory Services
Benjie is a Partner in Assurance. He is PFRS/PFRS accredited ► He has led audits of publicly-listed companies from various
based on EY/SGV requirements. He obtained his bachelor’s industries such as power distribution, power generation, real estate,
degree in Accountancy from the San Beda College and retail operations, education institutions, healthcare,
place 3rd in the May 2004 CPA licensure examinations. He telecommunications and semiconductor
is also Certified Internal Auditor and a member of PICPA. ► He also has extensive experience on financial statement audits of
companies reporting under International Financial Reporting
Relevant experience Standards, US GAAP and SOX 404 audits of internal control over
financial reporting
► Benjie has led various accounting support and advice to ► He is a member of Accounting Standards Group and specializes in
various clients and public listed entities on: issues dealing with revenue recognition, leases, business
► Audit remediation and readiness combinations, impairment, intangible assets and provisions,
► New accounting standards (i.e., PFRS 15, Revenue;
contingent liabilities and contingent assets.
PFRS 9, Financial Instruments; PFRS 16, Leases) ► He is also a member of the Capital Markets Center team and assists
► Service concession arrangements
clients in domestic and cross-border capital raising transactions
(IPOs and public bond offerings).
► Share or asset purchase agreements
► Financial Instruments accounting (business model
assessment and development)
► Transaction accounting
► Corporate treasury
► Finance digital transformation (data analytics, data
visualization, robotics and process automation)
#SGVforABetterPhilippines
SGV | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory