Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

3/12/24, 6:14 PM What is the difference between jurisprudence and legal theory?

- University of Lincoln

You are here: Home / Articles / What is the difference between jurisprudence and legal theory?

What is the difference between jurisprudence


and legal theory?
July 19, 2022

Jurisprudence, in its simplest form, is the philosophy of law. It includes the study
and analysis of law generally, as well as its systems, institutions, and principles.
Legal theory, meanwhile, focuses specifically on the law in practice: how it
functions and operates within societies. So while jurisprudence and legal theory
are intrinsically linked, and often used synonymously, one (legal theory) is
actually a subset of the other (jurisprudence).

Linda

What is the purpose of jurisprudence


I'm a virtual and
assistant that can help you with
questions you may have.
legal theory?
How can
Jurisprudence and legal theory help people I help you?
to better comprehend the law, legal
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
systems, and legal reasoning.
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
The study of law – including its origins, history, and its principles – and legal
Cookie Settings Accept All
philosophy provides a deeper understanding of the subject. It also helps illustrate

 CALL  APPLY REQUEST INFO

https://online.lincoln.ac.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-jurisprudence-and-legal-theory/#:~:text=Jurisprudence%2C in its simplest form,functio… 1/6


3/12/24, 6:14 PM What is the difference between jurisprudence and legal theory? - University of Lincoln

how the law has shaped – and been shaped by – societies past and present.

This can benefit a number of people, including:

Law students.

Lawyers.

Judges.

Jurists.

This is because a thorough understanding of legal philosophy and law’s


theoretical and historical foundation ensures that those working within legal
systems better understand the fundamentals of the law. It enables legal
professionals [https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/en/public/for-public-
visitors/resources/who-does-what] to appropriately apply the law and better
perform legal tasks and activities.

Examples of jurisprudence and legal


theories
The common consensus is that general jurisprudence includes two categories
and five main schools of thought. And within each of these, there are a number
of different legal theories.

The two categories of jurisprudence


1. Analytical jurisprudence, which examines questions such as ‘What is the
law?’. Linda
2. Normative jurisprudence, which examines questions such as ‘What is the
I'm a virtual assistant that can help you with
purpose of the law?’ and ‘What is the questions
value ofyou
themay
rulehave.
of law?’.

The five schools ofHow can thought


I help you? in general
We jurisprudence
use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
However, you may visit
Philosophical "Cookieof
school Settings"
thought to provide a controlled consent.

Cookie Settings Accept All



 CALL  APPLY REQUEST INFO

https://online.lincoln.ac.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-jurisprudence-and-legal-theory/#:~:text=Jurisprudence%2C in its simplest form,functio… 2/6


3/12/24, 6:14 PM What is the difference between jurisprudence and legal theory? - University of Lincoln

Philosophical jurisprudence is rooted in natural law – the belief that law is a


logical extension of humanity’s inherent morals and common societal rules.

Key contributors to this school of thought include:

Aristotle, the Greek philosopher who is widely considered to be the father of


natural law. While Aristotle spoke more on morality, rather than the law as we
know it, his arguments about political justice and political philosophy – that
justice is derived from both nature and convention – have helped shape the
arguments of modern natural law theorists.

Thomas Equinas, the theologian who argued that there were four kinds of
law: eternal law – divine reason known only to God – natural law, divine law
as shared through scripture, and human law.

John Finnis [https://law.nd.edu/news-events/news/legacy-of-john-finnis/] , a


modern natural law theorist who maintains that law is moral by nature.

Analytical school of thought

The analytical school of thought borrows from analytical philosophy to better


understand the nature of law. It asks questions such as ‘What are laws?’, ‘What
is the relationship between law and power?’, and “What is the relationship
between law and morality?’.

Key contributors to this school of thought include:

Jeremy Bentham, a philosopher and jurist who opposed the idea of natural
law and championed social reforms such as individual freedom, equal rights
for women, the decriminalisation of homosexuality, and the abolition of
slavery. Linda
H.L.A. Hart, a legal philosopher who published the influential The Concept of
I'm a virtual assistant that can help you with
Law [https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/reading-hla-harts-the-concept-of-law-
questions you may have.
9781849463249/] in 1961. Hart said that a legal system’s validity comes from
what he called the “rule of recognition”
How can– the
I helpcombination
you? of primary and
We usesecondary rules
cookies on our and to
website sources
give youofthelaw that
most createexperience
relevant the legalbysystem.
remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Hans
However, Kelsen,
you may an Austrian
visit "Cookie Settings"jurist who published
to provide Pure Theory of Law in 1934
a controlled consent.
before authoring a significantly expanded second edition in 1960.
Cookie Settings Accept All

 CALL  APPLY REQUEST INFO

https://online.lincoln.ac.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-jurisprudence-and-legal-theory/#:~:text=Jurisprudence%2C in its simplest form,functio… 3/6


3/12/24, 6:14 PM What is the difference between jurisprudence and legal theory? - University of Lincoln

It’s worth noting that Hart and Kelsen’s books are still commonly cited in
jurisprudential research, and both men are considered among the foremost legal
philosophers of the twentieth century.

Historical school of thought

Historical jurisprudence rejects the idea of natural law, and asserts that law is
found, rather than made, within a community of people.

The key contributor to this school of thought was Friedrich Carl von Savigny, who
believed that the purpose of jurisprudence was to examine existing bodies of law
for insight into their historical origins and subsequent transformations.

Realist school of thought

The realist school of thought suggests that jurisprudencial research should mirror
natural scientific methods rather than philosophical ones.

Key contributors to this school of thought include:

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., an American jurist and Supreme Court Justice
who argued that judges and legal professionals draw from realist influences,
such as public policy, as well as personal prejudice and experience, when
practising law or deciding cases.

Karl Llewellyn, an American jurisprudential scholar, who argued that the law is
composed of the facts and outcomes of cases, rather than legal rules and
legal doctrines.

Sociological school of thought

Sociological jurisprudence developed in the twentieth


Lindacentury alongside
sociology and other social sciences. Today, it helps shed light on the relationship
I'm a virtual assistant that can help you with
between law and culture. questions you may have.

The key contributor to this school of thought is Roscoe Pound, formerly the Dean
How can I help you?
of Harvard’s school of law, who helped emphasise the importance of social
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
relationships
preferences in the
and repeat development
visits. of law,
By clicking “Accept asyou
All”, well as the
consent importance
to the use of ALL of
thelaw within
cookies.
However,
socialyou may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
relationships.
Cookie Settings Accept All

 CALL  APPLY REQUEST INFO

https://online.lincoln.ac.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-jurisprudence-and-legal-theory/#:~:text=Jurisprudence%2C in its simplest form,functio… 4/6


3/12/24, 6:14 PM What is the difference between jurisprudence and legal theory? - University of Lincoln

Common legal theories


1. Natural law. Natural law theory suggests that the law should be based on
humanity’s intrinsic ethics and morals. It is the key theory within
jurisprudence’s philosophical school of thought, and is associated with the
maxim ‘An unjust law is no law at all’.

2. Legal positivism. Legal positivism is the dominant theory within the


analytical school of thought. Positive law is effectively the antithesis to
natural law, proposing that the law isn’t actually connected to any kind of
inherent morality, but rather is the product of a human body such as the
government. Prominent positivist proponents include Bentham, and jurists
John Austin [https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Austin] and Joseph
Raz [https://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/article/memoriam-joseph-raz-1931-
2022] . Its detractors include Ronald Dworkin
[https://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/feb/14/ronald-dworkin] , an American
philosopher whose critiques of the theory argue that the law cannot be
separated from morality.

3. Legal realism. Legal realism is the foundation for the realist school of
thought, and also has ties for the sociological school of thought. It contends
that the law should be descriptive, and should account for the reasons –
besides legal rules – that lead to any particular legal ruling or decision.

4. Critical legal studies. Critical legal studies is a relatively new theory that
has developed over the past few decades. With ties to legal realism, it
suggests that the law is contradictory, and is effectively an expression of a
dominant social group’s policy goals.

Additional legal theories cover topics such as:


Linda

International law.
I'm a virtual assistant that can help you with
questions you may have.
Criminal law.

Common law.
How can I help you?
We useConstitutional law. to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
cookies on our website
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Critical
However, race
you may visittheory.
"Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.

CookieFeminist
Settings legal theory.
Accept All

 CALL  APPLY REQUEST INFO

https://online.lincoln.ac.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-jurisprudence-and-legal-theory/#:~:text=Jurisprudence%2C in its simplest form,functio… 5/6


3/12/24, 6:14 PM What is the difference between jurisprudence and legal theory? - University of Lincoln

Human rights.

Share this entry



Linda

I'm a virtual assistant that can help you with


questions you may have.

How can I help you?


We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.

Cookie Settings Accept All



 CALL  APPLY REQUEST INFO

https://online.lincoln.ac.uk/what-is-the-difference-between-jurisprudence-and-legal-theory/#:~:text=Jurisprudence%2C in its simplest form,functio… 6/6

You might also like