Slide 1

Good Morning Everyone I am Kyle Rivas, (Intro of the rest of your groupmates). We are the group 8 and
the topic we’re gonna discuss is all about a A Pig Satisfied and a Pig Dissatisfied: Mill on Higher Pleasures

Slide 2

So first of all, Who is John Stuart Mill, The main character of our topic.

So Johns Stuart Mill is was an English philosopher, economist, and exponent of utilitarianism.

He was prominent as a publicist in the reforming age of the 19th century and remains of lasting interest
as a logician and an ethical theorist.

especially yun ngang ideology of "utilitarianism"

kung saan ang isang aksyon (o uri ng aksyon) ay tama kung ito ay may posibilidad na magbigay
ng kaligayahan o kasiyahan at mali kung ito ay may posibilidad na magdulot ng kalungkutan o
sakit-hindi lamang para sa gumaganap ng aksyon kundi pati na rin para sa lahat ng iba pang
apektado nito

(o which an action (or type of action) is right if it tends to promote happiness or pleasure and
wrong if it tends to produce unhappiness or pain—not just for the performer of the action but
also for everyone else affected by it)

Now that we are moving in the next slide, lets discuss ano nga ba yung utilitiarianism"

Slide 5

Now I’m gonna share with you yung isa sa mga famous quotes ni John Stuart Mill

(Reads the Quotes)

And if the fool, or the pig, is of a different opinion, it is only because they only know their own side of
the question.”

John Stuart Mill throws down this quote at the beginning of the second chapter of his
book Utilitarianism. In this quote, he argues that no reasonable person would ever want to be a dog or a
pig just for the sake of being more comfortable. Yes, being human can sometimes cause stress that
animals or fools don't have to deal with. But Mill totally can't imagine someone wanting to give up their
human brain just for the comfort of animal life. Although, sometimes you've got to wonder how nice it'd
be…

Oo, kung minsan ang mga tao nagkakaroon ng stress na hindi kailangang harapin ng mga hayop. Ngunit
lubos na hindi maisip ni Mill na may gustong isuko ang kanilang utak ng tao para lamang sa kaginhawaan
ng buhay ng mga hayop. Bagaman, minsan kailangan mong magtaka kung gaano ito kaganda...
Last Slide

That’s the end of our report. I hope you have learned something about it, and thankyou so much for
listening

A human being dissatisfied in comparison to a satisfied pig. This talks about how humans have more
complex desires in comparison to animals, that can be a literal understanding. But if we go into a deeper
analysis this may be in reference of how humans have various desires and how unattainable our desires
can be. I mean can there even be a satisfied pig? Aren't they the eternaly houngry? So this may mean
that it is better to be wanting for something to attain, than to be stagnant and conceding with what life
gives us.

As for Socrates in comparison to the fool, to me that is quite obvious. There is a saying that goes
“ignorance is bliss” and “a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing” those of us who do not question
our curiosity have it made. Why trouble your mind for something you cannot comprehend? I ill advise it,
you will just get a headache and you will thank me later. To better understand one self is to know the
enemy and in the words of gi joe, “knowing is just half of the battle.

Isang taong hindi nasisiyahan kumpara sa isang nasisiyahang baboy. Ito ay tungkol sa kung paano ang
mga tao ay may mas kumplikadong mga pagnanasa kumpara sa mga hayop, na maaaring maging isang
literal na pag-unawa. But if we go deeper on it, ito ay maaaring sanggunian kung paano ang mga tao ay
may iba't ibang mga pagnanasa at kung gaano hindi matamo ang ating mga pagnanasa. I mean pwede
bang may kuntentong baboy? Hindi ba sila ang walang hanggang gutom? Kaya ito ay maaaring
mangahulugan na ito ay mas mahusay na pagnanais para sa isang bagay upang makamit, kaysa sa
maging walang pag-unlad at conceding sa kung ano ang buhay ay nagbibigay sa amin.

Tulad ng para kay Socrates kung ihahambing sa tanga, sa akin ay medyo halata iyon. Mayroong isang
kasabihan na nagsasabing "kamangmangan ay kaligayahan" at "kaunting kaalaman ay maaaring maging
isang mapanganib na bagay" sa atin na hindi nagtatanong sa ating pagkamausisa ay ginawa ito. Bakit mo
ginugulo ang iyong isip para sa isang bagay na hindi mo maintindihan? I i ill advise it, sasakit lang ang ulo
mo tapos magpasalamat ka sa akin. Upang mas maunawaan ang isang sarili ay kilalanin ang kalaban at sa
mga salita ni gi joe, "alam ay kalahati lamang ng labanan. Ay Joe!"
Better to strive as hard as one can as a human being and came up short. Than to live the life of
domesticated animal that is a slave to pleasure and impulses. By forgoing excessive pleasure one opens
up the path to attaining true human happiness. That is essentially the achievement of one’s most prized
single goal or dream before death. Specifically,

it is in the pursuing of one’s goal and not in the attaining of the goal, however, that one finds true
happiness. Because to be denied the ability to realize one’s goal is much worse than striving for one’s
goal and never grasping it completely.

hangga't maaari magsikap na tayo bilang isang tao. Kaysa mamuhay bilang isang hayop na alipin ng
pleasure. Sa pamamagitan ng pagtalikod sa sobrang preassure ay nagbubukas ang isang tao ng landas
tungo sa pagkamit ng tunay na kaligayahan ng tao. That is essentially the achievement of one’s most
prized single goal or dream before death. Specifically, it is in the pursuing of one’s goal and not in the
attaining of the goal, however, that one finds true happiness. Dahil ang pagkaitan ng kakayahang
makamit ang layunin ng isang tao ay higit na mas masahol kaysa sa pagsusumikap para sa layunin ng
isang tao at hindi ito ganap na nauunawaan.