CIA-II

Culture's Role in Violence

Class- 2 BscPSY A

Roll no.- 2333818

Violent crime and culture have a complicated relationship that is shaped by a number of institutional,
historical, social, and economic factors. Attitudes towards violence are shaped by cultural standards,
while crime rates are influenced by socioeconomic differences. While prejudices in the criminal justice
system help to keep crime cycles going, the media has the power to both glorify and criticise violence.
Cultural attitudes toward violence are significantly shaped by historical background as well. Often there
has been a correlation between an increase in crime and violence and misinterpretation or exploitation of
religion. Acts of terrorism, persecution, and violence can all be justified by adopting extreme
interpretations of religious scriptures and beliefs. Religious disagreements have often led to sectarianism,
bloodshed, and societal upheaval. In addition, certain religious figures or institutions have the potential to
foster animosity or bigotry against particular communities, resulting in prejudice and aggression.
Furthermore, religious institutions may be used by criminal groups for extortion, recruiting, and money
laundering, among other things, which exacerbates crime and violence in local communities. Violent
conflicts can also result from the fusion of political ideology and religion, as well as power disputes.
Understanding these processes is crucial for successfully reducing criminal activity and fostering
communal unity.Deeply exploring the complexities of culture, violence, and crime, "Article 15" and "The
Kashmir Files" provide extensive analyses that highlight the systemic problems in Indian society.

The story “Article 15” methodically peels back the layers of caste-based discrimination, demonstrating
how historical injustices, customs, and cultural norms combine to justify crimes and violence against
underprivileged populations. Anubhav Sinha, the director, presents a harsh world in which social
interactions, economic possibilities, and even access to justice are determined by caste hierarchy. Honor
murders, sexual assault, and structural oppression are just a few of the horrific effects of caste
discrimination that are emphasized in the movie. Viewers are forced to confront their own prejudices and
responsibility in maintaining such conditions when they follow the protagonist's trip and are exposed to
the terrible reality experienced by individuals at the bottom of the caste structure.

The thriller "The Kashmir Files," on the other hand, delves deeply into one of the most controversial
issues in India and examines the complicated interactions between political, religious, and cultural
elements that encourage crime and bloodshed in the area. Director Vivek Agnihotri methodically
reassembles past occurrences and firsthand accounts to show the human cost of the struggle in Kashmir.
The show highlights the crimes carried out by state and non-state entities, such as ethnic cleansing, forced
disappearances, and massacres. It reveals how historical narratives and cultural identities are weaponized
to justify violence and prolong cycles of suffering by dissecting the underlying grievances and identity
politics that have defined the war.

Furthermore, both pieces are potent critiques of institutional shortcomings in resolving societal challenges
and systemic injustices. "Article 15" exposes the impunity enjoyed by violent offenders and the lack of
responsibility in the pursuit of justice, while "The Kashmir Files'' criticises the shortcomings of the legal
system and law enforcement organisations in defending the rights of underprivileged people.The
compelling narratives of "Article 15" and "The Kashmir Files" compel viewers to face hard realities about
the murky underbelly of Indian history and society. To confront ingrained cultural prejudices, historical
injustices, and structural inequality, they call for reflection, empathy, and group action. In addition to
being enjoyable, these movies also spark discussion and debate, bringing up issues such as social reform,
forgiveness, and the goal of a more fair and just society.

In conclusion, crime rates are greatly impacted by the interaction of cultural dynamics and socioeconomic
variables. Crime becomes a method of surviving and an outlet for dissatisfaction in situations where
poverty, inequality, restricted access to jobs and education, and institutionalised prejudice exist. Owing to
societal marginalisation and institutional obstacles, marginalised cultural groups have greater rates of
poverty and criminal activity. The media, which include films, television series, music, and video games,
influences how society views crime and violence, sometimes making people less sensitive to it or even
glorifying it. But the media may also promote peaceful dispute resolution and question cultural norms.
Cycles of violence and marginalisation are sustained by institutional biases in the criminal justice system,
which are impacted by racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences. Trust in law enforcement is
impacted by cultural views about authority, which also has an effect on crime rates and community
safety.there is a complex and dynamic connection between culture, crime, and violence that is impacted
by a wide range of interrelated elements. In order to effectively prevent crime, advance social justice, and
create inclusive and resilient communities, it is imperative that we acknowledge and comprehend these
complexities.