Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

ANNEX 12– END INNOVATION PROJECT OUTCOME AND IMPACT EVALUATION TEMPLATE

Title of Innovation: ____________________________________________________________ Date of Monitoring: ________________

Proponent/s: ____________________________________, _________________________________, ___________________________________

A. Innovation Accomplishments

Phase Activity Status Remarks

Achieved Not Achieved

1. Pre-
Implementation
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

2. Implementation

3. Post-
Implementation

B. Outcome and Impact Evaluation

Area Status

Fully Evident (FE) Partially Evident (PE) Not Evident (NE)

1. Relevance (on alignment and consistency with national priorities

and policies, on responsiveness to stakeholder needs, on
complementation with other programs/projects, and programmatic
alternatives)

2. Effectiveness (on achievement of objectives, on unintended results,

and on timeliness such as learning outcomes, access, equity, or
client satisfaction)

3. Efficiency (on efficient delivery of outputs and operational

alternatives

1. Sustainability (on having a defined strategy for accomplishing long-

term objectives to maintain the innovation's programs and activities)

Evaluated by:

_________________________________________________
Assistant Schools Superintendent
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

________________________________ _____________________________________ ______________________________

Member Member Member

________________________________ _____________________________________ ______________________________

Member Member Member
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

ANNEX 8 – PROGRESS IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING OF INNOVATION PROJECT TEMPLATE

Title of Innovation: ____________________________________________________________ Date of Monitoring: ________________

Proponent/s: ____________________________________, _________________________________, ___________________________________

Activity Status Technical

Issue/s encountered Assistance Agreement
(Based on Workplan) Completed On-going Provided

Prepared by:

NAME INNOVATION SECRETARIAT MEMBER/S

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

ANNEX 6 – GUIDE FOR APPRAISING INNOVATION PROJECT PROPOSALS

Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions

Low High
Criterion Score

Rationale for the Not The innovation proposal presents The reason for the The nature and extent of the
Innovation Provided a general description of the need innovation is indicated concerned area are comprehensively
for innovation. specifically but discussed discussed. The priority
(No point) less comprehensively improvement area is clearly
identified. Root cause analysis/
research findings/recommendation
or needs assessment is indicated to
support the need for innovation.

(21-30 Points)

(1-10 Points) (11-20 Points)

(30 Points)

Alignment of the Not The alignment innovation proposal The suggested innovation's alignment with the rationale is clearly
Proposed Innovation evident is less evident in the rationale. indicated.
to the Rationale

(10 Points) (No point) (1-5 Points) (6-10 Points)

Feasibility of the Not Scope reflects a limited
Innovation feasible understanding of feasibility. The
proposed project may be too large
or too small to complete in the
timeframe.
The proposal includes a The proposal demonstrates
strategy for developing a consideration of the feasibility and
timeline and reaching appropriateness of the project;
intended beneficiaries. includes detailed work and work
plans.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

(1-3 Points) (8-10 Points)

(10 Points) (No point) (4-7 Points)

Potential Impact of Not clear Assessment of the potential impact Assessment of the potential impact of the innovation uses clear
the Innovation to is poor, too general, or does not data analysis to assess improvement. The assessment has a clear
Improve the (No point) use any metrics. reference to a baseline.
Concerned Area

(30 Points)
(1-15 Points) (16-30 Points)

Completeness of The innovation proposal is The innovation misses at The innovation proposal is
Innovation Proposal significantly incomplete and lacks most two requirements for organized and contains all the
more than two requirements for the proposal. requirements for the proposal.
the proposal.

(20 Points) (1-6 Points) (7-14 Points) (15-20 Points)

Total ____/100

Remarks:
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education