Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EM StyleBook
EM StyleBook
By Janis Hurst
Known in the SCA
as Master Edyth Miller, OL
This booklet and its contents were made All images from manuscripts are
for the medieval recreation community, captioned or otherwise labeled with
or anyone interested in this fashion their source information. All other
period. In that context, it’s validity contents are copyright 2018, Janis Hurst.
should come after any official research
into the topics discussed here. This booklet is intended for non-
commercial, non-profit, educational use
This is not an official publication of the only, and may be shared in its entirety
Society for Creative Anachronisms, Inc. for such purpose.
(SCA).
COVER: “The Book of the Queen”, BL MS Harley 4431, 1410-1414AD, fol. 323r
“The Book of Good Manners”, BnF MS French 1023, circa 1410, fol. 60v
Throughout, I have also include a “kit” guide for the reenactor for
each class tier. These lists are fairly thorough guides to what you
should keep an eye out for or focus on creating as you build your
persona wardrobe. These lists should be used as guides only. It’s
important to do additional research into the items I suggest in
order to achieve the most authenticity in your presentation.
Dresses
Women in the Lower Class had two basic options for dresses.
The loose-fitting tunic dress with long sleeves, which was the
primary dress type worn by most women up to the end of the 14th
century, was still in use among this class, but was by this point the
least fashionable option.
Some women in this rank may have had the means to procure new
dresses on a regular cycle, but hand-me-downs also had a market.
Stripped of anything regulated through custom or law, upper class
clothing regularly made its way down to women of lower rank.
Some women may have been given clothing as a form of income
from a patron or lord. It’s possible, therefore, that some women
in the Lower Class owned garments of a finer nature than they
would ever be able to purchase new or on their own.
Headdress
The wool open hood reached its heyday among the upper classes
at the end of the 14th century, and quickly became one of the
most ubiquitous headdress styles of the early 15th century. The
French in particular liked the style. Due to its vast popularity,
open hoods became available to nearly every woman. Lower
class women were more likely to purchase second hand or mass-
produced hoods than to have one made, meaning that it would
often fit a bit less ideally, with larger cowls, shorter brims or
generally being over- or undersized.
Colors
Accessories
None of the images of women from this class group indicate the
use of jewelry or decorative items other than belt mounts, but to
keep their hoods and veils in place, they likely had a few simple
veil pins. They may have also had some low-quality cast silver
badges gained from pilgrimages or festivals that they may have
sewn to their dresses on occasion.
Dark Leather
Turnshoes
There was no formal middle class during the early 15th century,
but there were many women who fell into groups that existed
between the Lower Class and the Upper Class. This group,
fashion-wise, is incredibly nuanced and vague in the imagery.
By tradition, and in some cases law, they were forbidden from
wearing certain cloth, fur, and jewel types (even if they could
Dresses
Women in the Middle Class had two options for dresses during
most of the period, then a third option starting in the 1430’s.
cotte would not have been as tight was the support layer, so there
may have been a subtle difference in which cottes were meant as
the first layer and which would be considered more gown-like.
This difference would have added to the value of her wardrobe.
Fitted cottes worn as gowns would have sleeves that could be
pushed or rolled up, and longer skirts. Girdling was also a popular
styling option among some groups of Middle Class women who
needed to move a lot during their day. The outer skirt would be
lifted to reveal the skirt of the support cotte underneath.
Women in the higher end of the Middle Class may have had a
different type of fitted cotte with integrated tippet sleeves.
These dresses were identical to the fitted cotte but their sleeve
transitioned above the elbow into long flat streamers that were
usually close to ground-length. The famous 15th century female
author Christine de Pisan was depicted in all her manuscript
versions wearing this gown, though her tippets were often shown
shorter than commonly depicted. These dresses were never
girdled, so they would not have been worn with a belt.
Not all women in this class could afford these new, more
fashionable gowns custom made by tailors. Peddler markets and
second-hand clothing merchants catered to these women by
offering affordable, quality used clothing. Urban clothing markets
All of the third-layer gown options for this class would have been
preferably, though not necessarily, fur-lined. Inexpensive furs,
such as rabbit, domestic squirrel, cat, or lambswool were options.
If a Middle Class woman could afford more luxurious options,
she would need to understand which furs she was legally allowed
to wear. She may have ignored the law, however, as sumptuary
regulations, if enforced, could generally be dealt with simply by
paying a fine. In some cases, she may have instructed the furrier
to use an inexpensive fur for the body of the garment and the
costly fur for the portions of the gown that it would be seen.
Headdress
Colors
Most Middle Class women would have had the ability to purchase
higher quality wool cloth with richly-colored dyes than those in
the Lower Class, even if just once a year or two. To show off this
ability, many Middle Class women are depicted wearing several
vibrant colors, often at once. Popular colors were royal blue,
deep fuschia pink, a vibrant apple green, some scarlet red, and
occasionally a gray lavender purple that was possibly produced
using a lichen-based dye, or by combining used indigo and
kermes dye baths. These fabrics would have been solid colored,
or possibly easy-to-produce woven patterns that read as solid
at a distance, such as twill or diamond weave. More complex
patterned materials would have exceeded most of these women’s
budgets.
Accessories
Middle Class women would have had at least one pair of sturdy
leather turnshoes. The shoes could be a slipper style with a
buckle or tie, or a slip on shoe. In any case, the shoes would have a
fashionable but short pointed toe and they would be dark in color
(black is what is used in the manuscripts). Tooling on the shoe
was also an option, and there is evidence that certain motifs were
popular and mass produced. Ideally, she would have also had a
pair of wood and leather pattens to keep her shoes in good shape
for longer.
Veil pins would have also been used for keeping hoods and veils
in place, and could have either been undecorated or she may have
had a few with pieces of coral, amber or semi-precious stones
affixed to the ends. Badges of saints or from travels would also
have been collected and worn.
Girdled Skirt
Reveals Fur Lining
Belt Purse
Fitted
Supportive
Cotte
Dark Leather
Pointed-Toe
Turnshoes
Dresses
Women in the Upper Class had several options for dresses during
this period.
Their support layer was a fitted cotte, laced on the front, side,
or possibly the back (since they would easily have assistance to
close it properly), with long fitted sleeves that may or may not
have had buttons. The sleeves of this dress were left down and
closed. Some versions of the cotte included cuffs that would
drape over the hands. These cuffs could be short or quite long. A
woman with long cuffs that concealed her hands was recognized
as wealthy with all her needs taken care of (i.e. no need to use her
hands.) The skirt of the cotte would have touched the ground and
slightly pooled. The fitted cotte would have a wide, low neckline,
and would lift and shape the bust. This dress would have been
Upper Class women would have used the same over cottes as
middle class women- either a second cotte or one with integrated
tippet sleeves. Girdling was not fashionable for this class,
however, and outer cotte sleeves were very rarely rolled up. In
many images, women (in both the Upper Class and Middle Class)
are shown wearing a single cotte with the sleeves down and the
skirts pooled on the floor. It’s impossible to know if this garment
was meant to indicate the supportive cotte layer, or if the base
cotte was concealed underneath. Context must be utilized here.
It would have been rare that these women would have appeared
in a public setting wearing just their supportive cotte. The visual
of these women in just a simple cotte, however, could have been a
The more prominent gown style for Upper Class women was the
houppelande. The houppelande made its appearance in women’s
fashion near the end of the 14th Century and eventually beat out
Here again, gowns would have been fur lined. Upper Class women
would have used expensive, imported furs such as miniver,
ermine, and Siberian squirrel, but they would have used the other
furs that were more widely available as well.
Headdress
The most widely used headdress in this class was what can be
described as a padded roll hat. It may sometime be referred to
as a reticulated headdress, bourrelet, or attifet. It consisted of
a thick, round roll of cloth shaped into a circle and attached to
a frame that held the roll into a roughly heart-shaped position
when viewed from the front. The frame could include horn-like
panels on the sides of the head, a netted panel across the top,
attached veils of sheer white silk, or sometimes beading, jewels
and embroidery. In some cases, the roll was supported on the
sides by buns of the woman’s own hair or false hair pieces. False
hair in the fashionable blonde shade could be made from cleaned
Upper Class women are the only class (aside from young women
in general) who would appear in public settings bare headed. They
would not, however, wear their hair loose and free unless they
were young and unmarried. The most prevalent styles involved all
the hair combed forward into buns or braids at the sides of the
head, referred to as “templars”, usually with a prominent center
part. Other times, the hair might be worn in a braid down the
back, but that seems to have been more of a style choice young
women opted for than older married women. A circlet, made
of metal, leather or tablet woven silk, and often decorated with
metal mounts or jewels, could be added to the templar hair styles.
Occasionally, though less commonly, small sheer veils of silk or
linen would be pinned to the circlet as well.
Much less commonly, women on the lower end of the Upper Class
would have worn open hoods. The hoods would have been custom
made in quality wool cloth in richly dyed hues.
Upper Class women had their pick of cloth colors, and would
have used those with the most true and vibrant dyes as much as
possible. This included the same royal blues, deep pinks, apple
greens, and of course, scarlet reds that the Middle Class desired,
but executed in more costly qualities of wool, and prohibitively
expensive silk. Layering would allow the woman to show off
different colors. Some affluent women (most commonly, affluent
courtesans) are depicted as showing off with a “robe”- multiple
layers executed in the same cloth dyed in the same dye bath. Red
made for the most expensively fashionable robe.
Accessories
Belts for this class were not meant to hold items, so belt purses
were not used by Upper Class women. Instead, when a pouch
was required, typically for alms-giving or other payments, the
It was more common for Upper Class women to wear jewelry, but
the types of decorative pieces she wore were still fairly limited.
Annular brooches and rings were common and available in many
styles and qualities. Same as Middle Class woman, rings were
worn in whatever position on whichever finger it fit best. Some
Upper Class women may have had necklaces or jeweled collars.
Jewels mounted into metal fittings would also have been applied
to belts and padded roll hats to further enhance the woman’s
wealthy look. Buckles for their belts would have also been quite
fine, cast from bronze or silver, and sometimes gilded and jeweled.
Veil pins would either be simple or could have amber, coral or
precious stones attached to the end. Among Upper Class women,
the higher quality cast badges of saints or from pilgrimages or
travels would have also been collected and shown off.
Gold Necklace
Houppelande with
Jeweled Belt Angel Wing Sleeves
and Collar
Fitted
Supportive
Cotte
Fur Lining
Exessive Skirt
Length
“The Comedies of Terence “, Arsenal, MS 664 reserve, first qrtr 15th C, fol. 152v
We can offer up some ideas for the reasons why older women
are treated in this manner in the manuscripts. The most obvious
possible reason is the ease of recognition that dressing older
women in such distinct, outdated fashions created. At a glance, a
reader can distinguish different characters in a scene if their style
of clothing makes it more obvious who is who (which is a general
principle for fashion in the real world, outside the manuscript
format as well.) If two women are in a scene, and one is older, it’s
far more effective to show that via her clothing than to attempt to
show that in her miniature facial details.
A third option is that these styles did actually still exist in use
by women over a certain age during this period, and there is no
intentional symbolism or shorthand intended. Since clothing
retained value over time due to the cost of the cloth and labor
involved to convert it into something wearable, garments were
handed down, reused, and worn out through several generations.
If a woman had a dress of good quality that came to her from
earlier predecessors, and could not afford anything better
to replace it, she would have worn it. It’s possible that these
garments lasted longer than the cotehardies of the late 14th
century, since they were not as customized to the wearer.
By the 15th century (and even by the end of the 14th) the sideless
surcoat and crown had both become reserved for special
occasions in actual use. The sideless surcoat, a long garment with
large oval openings on both sides and trimmed with fur, developed
and became popular through the 14th century, and began to
be worn by royal ladies for marriages, coronations, or other
Depictions of Maidens
Clean, long hair was a good sign of a young woman’s health and
means, and an easy visual way for a maiden to show her appeal
along with her availability. She would not necessarily always have
worn it in this manner, and there are many examples of young
women in the other styles we’ve previously discussed. It does,
however, provide a convenient way for manuscript illuminators
to show the age and status of a young woman if it matters for the
context of her story. When she is married, the young woman’s
hair would be concealed under her cap, veil or hood, or put up in
the appropriate fashionable styles, and for the most part, only her
husband and children would see her long loose hair again.
The information that we can gain by studying the full group of 563
images of women is certainly much deeper than can be explained
and examined here. In addition to simply knowing what was
worn and who wore what, there are questions surrounding why,
how, and in which situations. There is much we can understand
about French women’s clothing in this period, however, simply by
knowing the basic breakdown of the garments that were available
We see also that each class, and even each tier within each class,
is constantly looking forward and upward to the fashions in
that direction. As more and more Lower Class women are gifted
or acquire cast-off fitted cottes, they become less suitable to
the classes above. As the Middle Class gains wealth and means,
exploiting systems that were never designed to handle an affluent,
free class of avid consumers, the Upper Class looks for new ways
to show their station and wealth that can’t easily be replicated by
those with lower status. As distinct as these class modes of dress
appear at first, the separations between them are nuanced and
unclear, and form the fashions of a society that’s barreling full-
speed toward modernity.
• Dyer, C., Standards of Living in the Later Middle Ages: Social Change in
England c. 1200-1520, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989).
• Egan, G., and Pritchard, F. Dress Accessories c. 1150-c. 1450. Boydell Press,
2002.
• Munro, J.H., “The Anti-Red Shift- To the Dark Side; Colour Changes in
Flemish Luxury Woollens, 1300-1550,” Medieval Clothing and Textiles,
Volume 3 (Woodbridge, The Boydell Press, 2007).
• Newman, P.B., Daily Life in the Middle Ages (North Carolina: McFarland &
Company, Inc., 1961).
• Newton, S.M., Fashion in the Age of the Black Prince: A study of the years
1340-1365, (Woodbridge, Boydell Press, 1980).
• Piponnier, F & Mane P, Dress in the Middle Ages (English Edition), (New
Haven, Yale University Press, 2007).
• Scott, M., Medieval Dress & Fashion, (London, The British Library, 2007).