Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NUISANCE Torts 1
NUISANCE Torts 1
PUBLIC NUISANCE
P and D neighbours – P had medical practicd – D had wheat- grinding machine – dust
entered lungs of patients suffering from pulmonary diseases – patients suffering more –
public nuisance (pollution) but special damage- liable.
2. Rose v Milles
Budge (huge boat for carrying food grains) across creak – P had a fleet of sheep – P had
to send ships in a roundabout way – more expenditure – special damage in public
nuisance.
Funeral procession of King Edward VII by P’s three storey house – P sold tickets to
people for them to come watch procession – D by that time had built seats and standes for
people on the highway – view of highway from P’s building blocked – P filed suit –
public nuisance (blocked highway) but special damage – D liable
D/A blocking public alleyway – P/R had to sometimes spend more to take roundabout
way – no special damage since P was not suffering special damage than everyone else
taking the roundabout way– not liable.
PRIVATE NUISANCE
P filed suit for permanent injunction on construction of flour mill – injunction given even
before nuisance caused – even anticipation of negligence is sufficient
P/R had ginning farm – A/D started a brick kiln – cotton products degraded in quality – P
sought injunction – both had proper license – but reasonable interference – anticipatory
nuisance.
3. Robinson v Kilvert
P standing on highway- cricket match being played in adjoining field – ball hit P- isolated
act of escape of ball – liable.
P carrying out construction business – D not fond of it – D bought plot close to P’s land
of work – D created noise intentionally (noise level lawful, but done maliciously) – even
though motive is not important in Torts, but unreasonable interference (lawful but
malicious) – liable (court does not see legality/ illegality).
P music teacher – P and D had common wall – D could not sleep peacefully – the
moment P gave music lessons, D made noise – liable (had this situation been in case of
two innocent individuals without malicious motive, there would have been no fault)
9. P owned part of forest which had a particular species of fox – vixen sensitive to
noise, especially during breeding season – D stayed in his property and within his
property itself, fired gun during breeding season – no reason to fire gun though
firing is lawful – liable.
D constructed building – P’s ancient windmill lost access to floe of air – right over
unlimited supply of air from neighbour’s land cannot be had unless there is a particular
ventilator or shaft that is being obstructed – not liable.
11. Bass v Gregory
D had cinema hall – huge queues – access to P’s house obstructed – nuisance- as
purchase of tickets in general creates huge queues.
D selling potatoes – long queue – obstruction – not liable as potato purchase in general
does not create huge queues (only due to popularity).
P walking on road adjoining D’s house – lamp fell – independent contractor had done a
bad job – the fact that independent contractor had been employed means that D knew
there might be danger – nuisance.