Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Which Among The Philosophies Do You Think That Teachers Should Most Consider in The Learning Process
Which Among The Philosophies Do You Think That Teachers Should Most Consider in The Learning Process
Among the many educational philosophies discussed, which of the following do you usually apply
in your respective areas of work? Justify your answer.
As Behaviorist theorists believe that behavior is shaped deliberately by forces in the environment
and that the type of person and actions desired can be the product of design, I as an educator agrees with
this. Behavior is determined by others, rather than by our own free will. By carefully shaping desirable
behavior, morality and information is learned. Learners will acquire and remember responses that lead to
satisfying aftereffects. Repetition of a meaningful connection results in learning. If the student is ready for
the connection, learning is enhanced; if not, learning is inhibited. Motivation to learn is the satisfying
after effect, or reinforcement.
Teachers help student learn by conditioning them through identifying the desired behaviors in
measurable, observable terms, recording these behaviors and their frequencies, identifying appropriate
reinforcers for each desired behavior, and providing the reinforcer as soon as the student displays the
behavior. I tend to use praises whenever my pupils recite during our discussions. I provide different
positive stamps that encourages them to actively engaged in learning. I somehow believe also that
intrinsic and extrinsic rewards especially to primary learners must be utilized to drive their passion and
motivation for an impactful learning.
2. Which among the management theories does your supervisor apply in your organization? Discuss
its advantages and disadvantages.
Among the different management theories discussed, I think our supervisor commonly applies the
Human Relations Theory especially when she interacts with us, her underlings. Human Relations Theory
is a management approach that emphasizes the significance of understanding and managing relationships
between individuals within an organization. Developed in the early 20th century, this theory aimed to
address the limitations of traditional management approaches that solely focused on productivity and
efficiency. Instead, human relations theory recognized the importance of social interactions, employee
motivation, and job satisfaction in achieving organizational goals.
By prioritizing positive interpersonal relationships, this theory encourages collaboration,
teamwork, and effective communication among employees. Additionally, it recognizes the individual
needs and motivations of employees, leading to higher levels of job satisfaction and increased employee
engagement. Human relations theory also promotes a supportive work environment that fosters creativity
and innovation by valuing diverse perspectives.
1. While human relations theory has made significant contributions to understanding employee
behavior and motivation, it is not without its limitations and criticisms. One major criticism
is that it overlooks the importance of formal organizational structures and processes. Critics
argue that an excessive focus on interpersonal relationships can lead to a lack of attention to
task-related goals, resulting in decreased efficiency.
Another limitation is that human relations theory tends to emphasize individual needs and
satisfaction, often neglecting broader organizational objectives. This narrow focus can
hinder the achievement of long-term goals, as employees may prioritize their personal
interests over those of the organization.
Furthermore, some argue that human relations theory places undue emphasis on employee
satisfaction as a driver of productivity, potentially undermining the significance of other
factors such as skills, training, and resources.
In conclusion, while human relations theory offers valuable insights into workplace
dynamics, its limitations must be acknowledged for a comprehensive understanding of
organizational behavior.
2. One significant disadvantage of human relations theory is the lack of individuality and
autonomy it promotes within organizations. This theory emphasizes the importance of group
dynamics and interpersonal relationships, often overshadowing the unique contributions and
capabilities of individuals.
In this approach, employees are encouraged to conform to group norms and expectations,
which can stifle their individuality. It may lead to a homogenous work environment where
diverse perspectives and ideas are suppressed in favor of maintaining harmony within the
group.
Furthermore, human relations theory places a heavy emphasis on social interactions and
mutual dependency, often resulting in a loss of personal autonomy. Individual decision-
making power is diminished as employees are expected to collaborate and reach consensus
with their peers.
Consequently, this lack of individuality and autonomy can hinder creativity, innovation, and
personal growth within organizations. It is important for managers to strike a balance
between fostering positive relationships among employees while also valuing their unique
talents and abilities.
3. One of the major drawbacks of the human relations theory is its inadequate consideration of
organizational structure and power dynamics within an organization. This theory primarily
focuses on interpersonal relationships and overlooks the importance of hierarchical
structures and power imbalances that exist in most organizations.
By neglecting to acknowledge the impact of organizational structure, the human relations
theory fails to address how power dynamics can influence decision-making processes,
resource allocation, and overall employee behavior. It does not account for the potential
abuse or misuse of power by managers or leaders, which can lead to favoritism,
discrimination, or other unethical practices.
Furthermore, this lack of attention to organizational structure limits its ability to provide
effective solutions for complex issues such as conflicts arising from differing power
positions or hierarchical tensions. Without considering these fundamental aspects, the
human relations theory may overlook key factors that contribute to organizational
dysfunction and hinder its ability to provide comprehensive strategies for improvement.