534 Vup DC 01

20-02-2024 R0 INITIAL SUBMISSION
DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION Designed Checked Approved

REVISIONS
CONTRACTOR :
M/s. SINDHU MURUGAN

CONSTRUCTION PVT, LTD
CLIENT : SAFETY CONSULTANTS
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY VASUPRADA CONSULTANTS

OF INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
PROOF CONSULTANTS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
TECHNOLOGY
PROJECT : Permanent Rectification of Black spot TN-(02)-115 by constructing a Vehicular Underpass (VUP) (20m x 5.5m) at
Km 80+200 (Sikkaraimedu Jn.) in the project of Hosur-Krishnagiri section of NH-7 (New No. NH 44) in the state of
Tamilnadu on EPC mode.
PROJ No. 534
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES 68 TITLE :
NAME SIGN DATE
DSGN 20-02-2024
CHKD 20-02-2024
DETAILED DESIGN OF RCC GIRDER OF VUP AT CH. 80+200
APPD 20-02-2024
CODE REV.
DOC. No. 5 3 4 - V U P - D C - 8 0 + 2 0 0 - 0 1
IRC R0
CONTENTS
S.No Item Description
1 Introduction, Input Data, Salient Features of Superstructure and Design Methodology
2 Grillage Model Representation
DESIGN FOR OUTER AND INNER GIRDER
3 Sectional Properties of Main Girder, Cross Girders
4 Calculation of Moments and Shears
5 Summary of Moments and Shear Forces
6 Effect of Temperature
7 Differential Shrinkage Calculation
8 Load Factors
9 Design of Longitudinal Girder - Ultimate Design
10 Stress Check
11 Crack Width Calculation of Longitudinal Girder
12 Design of Longitudinal Girder - Flexural Shear & Interface Shear
DESIGN FOR END DIAPHRAGM
13 Design of End Diaphragm
DESIGN FOR RCC DECK SLAB
14 Design of Deck Slab
DESIGN OF BEARINGS
15 Elastomeric Bearing Design

The following report presents the design calculations of RCC Precast Girder. The RCC Girder is designed for Limit State of Collapse, Limit state of
Serviceability. All applicable loads and Load combinations are calculated using IRC 6:2017 and IRC 112:2020. It includes Design of Precast RCC Girder,
RCC Deck Slab, RCC End Diaphragm and Bearings.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Grade of Materials
Grade of Concrete for RCC Slab M 35
Grade of Concrete For Precast girder M 35
Grade of Concrete For Diaphragm M 35
Grade of Reinforcement Fe 500
Elastic Moduli of Material

2
Elastic Modulus of Concrete Ecm,Slab 32000 N/mm As per Table 6.5, IRC:112-2020
2
Elastic Modulus of Concrete Ecm,Girder&Diaphragm 32000 N/mm As per Table 6.5, IRC:112-2020
2
Elastic Modulus of Steel Es 200000 N/mm As per Clause 6.3.5, IRC:112-2020
Coefficient of Friction m 0.05 As per Clause 706.3.4, IRC: 78-2014
Density of RCC 25 KN/m3 IRC: 6-2017

Density of Wearing Coat 22 KN/m3
SUPERSTRUCTURE & SPAN DETAILS

Type of Superstructure - RCC Precast Girder
Type of Bearing - Elastomeric Bearing
No of Spans - 1
Skew Angle - 0 degree 0.000 Radians
Span effective from E/J to E/J (Sk) - 22.00 m
Span effective from E/J to E/J (SQ) - 22.00 m
Span effective from Brg. to Brg. (Sk) - 21.00 m
Overall Deck Width - 13.25 m
Length of the Girder - 21.80 m
No. of Girders - 4.0 m
Depth of the Girder - 1.700 m
Spacing of Girders in transverse dirn - 3.20 m
Cantilever of the Deck from outer girder - 1.83
Thickness of Deck Slab - 240 mm
Thickness of Wearing Coat - 0.065 m
Expansion Gap in Abutment - 0.040 m
LOADS
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD
SIDL due to wearing coat on girder - Unit wt. of WC x Spacing b/w girders x thickness of WC
- 22 x 3.20 x 0.065
Load Intensity - 4.58 KN/m
SIDL Due to crash barriers - Unit wt. of RCC x Cross sectional area of crash barrier
Load Intensity - 25 x 0.325 8.125 KN/m
Footpath LL as per IRC 6:2014 - 340 kg/m2
CARRIAGEWAY LIVE LOAD ( CWLL )
Superstructure meant for 3-lane carriageway has been designed for governing effect of CWLL loading as specified in IRC:6-2017 with appropriate lane
reduction factor and suitable allowances for impact (as mentioned below) so placed on the span to produce maximum stresses.
Impact Factor = 1.167
Lane Reduction Factor for three lane = 0.900
Lane Reduction Factor for four lane = 0.800
The following CWLL combination have been considered in the design. The design is then carried out for the most critical CWLL Combination.
3 lane loading
Class 70RW most eccentric case from crash barrier
3 Class A loading
Class 70RW most eccentric case from crash barrier + 1 Class A eccentric from other crash barrier side
SPV loading
* footpath live load
TEMPERATURE EFFECT
The climate condition is assumed to be "MODERATE".
The temperature variation of +/- 27.5 oC shall be considered for the design of bearings and expansion joints.
Temperature gradients given in IRC 6:2017 has also been considered to evaluated the effect on structure due to daily changes in temperature.
Coefficient of thermal expansion as per IRC: 6-2017 = 1.20E-05
Poisson's Ratio = 0.20
HUMIDITY
The bridge is located in Dry atmospheric conditions. The ambient relative humidity (RH) is assumed to be = 80 %
DESIGN CONSTANTS
Girder Diaphragm Slab
fy = 500 500 500 N/mm2
fyd = 435 435 435 N/mm2 As per Clause 6.2.2, IRC:112-2020
fck = 35 35 35 N/mm2
fctm = 2.80 2.80 2.80 N/mm2 As per Table 6.5, IRC:112-2020
fcd = 15.63 15.63 15.63 N/mm2
Unit Weight of Materials

Unit Weight of Precast Concrete Girder = 25 kN/m3
Unit Weight of Reinforced Concrete = 25 kN/m3
Unit Weight of Green Concrete = 26 kN/m3
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SECTION PROPERTIES
Uncracked sectional properties have been used for analysis.The effective flange widths for sectional properties for the longitudinal girders and cross
diaphragms have been determined in accordance with IRC:112-2020.
LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF THE DECK FOR SIDL & CWLL
Superstructure has been modeled as an equivalent grillage mesh consisting of longitudinal and transverse members. Analysis of Self weight of girder
and green concrete of slab has been carried out by single line model and the analysis of SIDL and CWLL has been carried out by grillage model. STAAD-
Pro Software, which is widely accepted for structural analysis,has been used for analysis. For the design of longitudinal girders , moments and shear
forces have been detremined at the crictical sections. The design of various components has been carried out by design excel sheets.
Diaphragms have been designed for DL+SIDL load in Jack up condition.
ANALYSIS OF DECK SLAB
Deck slab has been analysed along transverse direction as a continuous beam with overhangs supported on longitudinal girders and diaphragms. Live
load effects shall be taken based on effective width method.
Fig. Showing the Grid Model of Superstructure with Longitudinal and Cross Girder using Staad-Pro
DESIGN OF OUTER GIRDER
AND INNER GIRDER
DETAILS OF GIRDERS CONSIDERED FOR ANALYSIS
1. LONGITUDINAL GIRDER
Beff Hence
0.240 m
1.000 0.150 m Lo = 21.00 m
0.100 m C/C of Girders = 3.20 m
Hence Beff = 3.200 m

1.700 m 0.300 (For Internal Girders)
1.050 m
Hence Beff = 3.425 m
(For External Girders)
Impact factors
1.167 Cl. A- Wheel
0.150 m 1.174 Cl. 70R wheel
0.250 m 1.100 Cl. 70R track
0.600
C/S OF GIRDER AT MID SECTION
Beff 0.48
0.240 m
0.240
1 m 0.150 m m
0.060 m
0.4 m 1.450 m
0.600 Section Through Diaphragm

1.490 m
1.700
0 m
0.000 m
0.6 m
C/S OF GIRDER AT END SECTION
1.725 m 0.9 m
0.4
CL of Girder
0.6 m 0.3 m
Plan showing web widening of Girder

CALCULATION OF SECTION PROPERTIES:
EXTERNAL GIRDER-CENTER SECTION
1.825 1.600
Xc Grade of Girder = M35
Y 1 0.240 m E of Girder = 32000 Gpa
1 2 0.150 m Grade of cast-in-situ slab = M 35
3 4 0.100 m E of Slab = 32000 Gpa
Factor = 1.000
X X
1.940 5
1.050 m
0.3
6 7 0.150 m
8 0.250 m
0.6
Y
Section
L H Area (A) CGx CGy ACGx ACGy X Y Torsion X-X bar Y-Y Bar X Y
No Type
1 R 3.43 0.240 0.8220 0.1125 0.1200 0.0925 0.0986 0.0039 0.8035 0.0079 -0.0536 0.4378 0.0024 0.1575
2 R 1 0.150 0.1500 0.0000 0.3150 0.0000 0.0473 0.0003 0.0125 0.0011 0.0589 0.2428 0.0005 0.0088
3 T 0.35 0.100 0.0175 -0.2667 0.4233 -0.0047 0.0074 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.3256 0.1345 0.0019 0.0003
4 T 0.35 0.100 0.0175 0.2667 0.4233 0.0047 0.0074 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 -0.2077 0.1345 0.0008 0.0003
5 R 0.3 1.300 0.3900 0.0000 1.0400 0.0000 0.4056 0.0549 0.0029 0.0117 0.0589 -0.4822 0.0014 0.0907
6 T 0.15 0.150 0.0113 -0.2000 1.6400 -0.0023 0.0185 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2589 -1.0822 0.0008 0.0132
7 T 0.15 0.150 0.0113 0.2000 1.6400 0.0023 0.0185 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 -0.1411 -1.0822 0.0002 0.0132
8 R 0.6 0.250 0.1500 0.0000 1.8150 0.0000 0.2723 0.0008 0.0045 0.0031 0.0589 -1.2572 0.0005 0.2371
1.5695 0.0925 0.8755 0.0600 0.8237 0.0240 0.0083 0.5211
4 4 2
Yc = 0.875 / 1.570 = 0.558 m Iz = 0.5811 m Itor = 0.0240 m Total Area = 1.5695 m
4 2
Xc = 0.092 / 1.570 = 0.05892 m Iy = 0.8321 m Area of Girder = 0.7475 m
Perimeter expose to atmosphere = 8.077
EXTERNAL GIRDER-END SECTION
1.825 1.600
1 2 0.150 m Grade of cast-in-situ slab = M 35
3 4 Yc 0.060 m E of Slab = 32000 Gpa
Factor = 1.000
X X
1.940 5
1.490 m
0.6
6 7 0.000 m
8 0.000 m
0.6
Y
Section
No Type
1 R 3.43 0.240 0.8220 0.1125 0.1200 0.0925 0.0986 0.0039 0.8035 0.0079 -0.0642 0.5249 0.0034 0.2264
2 R 1 0.150 0.1500 0.0000 0.3150 0.0000 0.0473 0.0003 0.0125 0.0011 0.0483 0.3299 0.0004 0.0163
3 T 0.2 0.060 0.0060 -0.3667 0.4100 -0.0022 0.0025 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4150 0.2349 0.0010 0.0003
4 T 0.2 0.060 0.0060 0.3667 0.4100 0.0022 0.0025 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.3184 0.2349 0.0006 0.0003
5 R 0.6 1.550 0.9300 0.0000 1.1650 0.0000 1.0835 0.1862 0.0279 0.1116 0.0483 -0.5201 0.0022 0.2516
6 T 0 0.000 0.0000 -0.3000 1.9400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3483 -1.2951 0.0000 0.0000
7 T 0 0.000 0.0000 0.3000 1.9400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2517 -1.2951 0.0000 0.0000
8 R 0.6 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0483 -1.2951 0.0000 0.0000
1.9140 0.0925 1.2343 0.1904 0.8440 0.1206 0.0075 0.4950
4 4 2
4 2
INTERNAL GIRDER-CENTER SECTION
1.600 1.600
1 2 0.150 m Grade of cast-in-situ slab = = M 35
3 4 Yc 0.100 m E of Slab = 32000 Gpa
x x Factor = 1.000
X
1.940 5
1.050 m
0.3
6 7 0.150 m
8 0.250 m
0.6
Y
Section
Type L H Area (A) CGx CGy ACGx ACGy X Y Torsion X-X bar Y-Y Bar X Y
No
1 R 3.20 0.240 0.7680 0.0000 0.1200 0.0000 0.0922 0.0037 0.6554 0.0074 0.0000 0.4534 0.0000 0.1579
2 R 1 0.150 0.1500 0.0000 0.3150 0.0000 0.0473 0.0003 0.0125 0.0011 0.0000 0.2584 0.0000 0.0100
3 T 0.35 0.100 0.0175 -0.2667 0.4233 -0.0047 0.0074 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.2667 0.1501 0.0012 0.0004
4 T 0.35 0.100 0.0175 0.2667 0.4233 0.0047 0.0074 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 -0.2667 0.1501 0.0012 0.0004
5 R 0.3 1.300 0.3900 0.0000 1.0400 0.0000 0.4056 0.0549 0.0029 0.0117 0.0000 -0.4666 0.0000 0.0849
6 T 0.15 0.150 0.0113 -0.2000 1.6400 -0.0023 0.0185 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2000 -1.0666 0.0005 0.0128
7 T 0.15 0.150 0.0113 0.2000 1.6400 0.0023 0.0185 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 -0.2000 -1.0666 0.0005 0.0128
8 R 0.6 0.250 0.1500 0.0000 1.8150 0.0000 0.2723 0.0008 0.0045 0.0031 0.0000 -1.2416 0.0000 0.2312
1.5155 0.0000 0.8690 0.0597 0.6756 0.0235 0.0034 0.5104
4 4 2
4 2
INTERNAL GIRDER-END SECTION
1.600 1.600
1 2 0.150 m Grade of cast-in-situ slab = = M 35
3 4 Yc 0.060 m E of Slab = 32000 Gpa
Factor = 1.000
X X
1.940 5
1.490 m
0.6
6 7 0.000 m
8 0.000 m
0.6
Y
Section
No Type
1 R 3.20 0.240 0.7680 0.0000 0.1200 0.0000 0.0922 0.0037 0.6554 0.0074 0.0000 0.5401 0.0000 0.2240
2 R 1 0.150 0.1500 0.0000 0.3150 0.0000 0.0473 0.0003 0.0125 0.0011 0.0000 0.3451 0.0000 0.0179
3 T 0.2 0.060 0.0060 -0.3667 0.4100 -0.0022 0.0025 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3667 0.2501 0.0008 0.0004
4 T 0.2 0.060 0.0060 0.3667 0.4100 0.0022 0.0025 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.3667 0.2501 0.0008 0.0004
5 R 0.6 1.550 0.9300 0.0000 1.1650 0.0000 1.0835 0.1862 0.0279 0.1116 0.0000 -0.5049 0.0000 0.2371
6 T 0 0.000 0.0000 -0.3000 1.9400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3000 -1.2799 0.0000 0.0000
7 T 0 0.000 0.0000 0.3000 1.9400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.3000 -1.2799 0.0000 0.0000
8 R 0.6 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -1.2799 0.0000 0.0000
1.8600 0.0000 1.2278 0.1902 0.6958 0.1201 0.0016 0.4797
4 4 2
4 2
Xc = 0.000 / 1.860 = 0.0000 m Iy = 0.6974 m Area of Girder =1.0920 m
END DIAPHRAGM
Xc
0.20 0.200
0.4 2 0.000 m Grade of cast-in-situ slab = M 35
3 4 Yc 0.000 m E of Slab = 32000 Gpa
1.450 m
X X
1.690 5
0.4
6 7 0.000 m
8 0.000 m
0.4
Y
Section
No Type
1 R 0.40 0.240 0.0960 0.0000 0.1200 0.0000 0.0115 0.0005 0.0013 0.0009 0.0000 0.7250 0.0000 0.0505
2 R 0.4 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6050 0.0000 0.0000
3 T 0 0.000 0.0000 -0.2000 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2000 0.6050 0.0000 0.0000
4 T 0 0.000 0.0000 0.2000 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2000 0.6050 0.0000 0.0000
5 R 0.4 1.450 0.5800 0.0000 0.9650 0.0000 0.5597 0.1016 0.0077 0.0309 0.0000 -0.1200 0.0000 0.0084
6 T 0 0.000 0.0000 -0.2000 1.6900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2000 -0.8450 0.0000 0.0000
7 T 0 0.000 0.0000 0.2000 1.6900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.2000 -0.8450 0.0000 0.0000
8 R 0.4 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.8450 0.0000 0.0000
0.6760 0.0000 0.5712 0.1021 0.0090 0.0319 0.0000 0.0588
4 4 2
4 2
Xc = 0.000 / 0.676 = 0 m Iy = 0.0090 m Area of Girder = 0.5800 m
Design Calculation ICTDesign of RCC Girder 22m span for 13.25m deck.xlsx
4.2 SECTIONS CONSIDERED IN DESIGN
C.L. OF GIRDER
C.L.OFXP. JOINT
5 4 3 2 1
C.L.OFXP. JOINT
0.000 L = 21.000 m ( Dist. Between temporary bearing )

L1 = 21.000 m ( Dist. Between permanent bearing )
22.00 m
SEC. DISTANCE FROM PERMANENT BEARING
1--1 0.5L 0.5 X 21.00 = 10.50 m
2--2 3/8 L 0.375 X 21 = 7.88 m
3--3 1/4 L 0.25 X 21 = 5.25 m
4--4 1/8 L 0.13 X 21 = 2.63 m

(At end of flaring)
5--5 deff = 1.769 m
1.77 / 21 = 0.08 L
NH-15 RCC-G /Type-2 / 2 Long. Section of Girder

TRANSVERSE SLAB MEMBERS
Deck Slab Thickness ( m ) = H3 = 0.240

Width of Slab Member-1 ( m ) = B1 = 1.063
Modification Factor for Concrete Grade = 1.000
CALCULATION OF TORSIONAL INERTIA

K - Factor = (1-0.63(t/b))/3
Multiplying Factor for Deck Slab = 0.5
Modification Factor for Concrete Grade = 1.000
Slab Memb Type & No Breadth Depth Area I - self K-Factor Mul.Factor Tor.Inertia
1.0 R-1 1.063 0.240 0.2550 0.0012 0.28590 0.5000 0.00210
2.0 R-2 1.313 0.240 0.3150 0.0015 0.29493 0.5000 0.00268
3.0 R-4 1.763 0.240 0.4230 0.0020 0.30473 0.5000 0.00371
4.0 R-4 2.625 0.240 0.6300 0.0030 0.31413 0.5000 0.00570
5.0 R-5 0.200 0.240 0.0480 0.0002 0.08133 0.5000 0.00011
6.0 R-6 0.001 0.240 0.0002 0.0000 -50.066 0.5000 -0.00035
Slab Memb Modified Modified Modified

Area I - self Tor.Inertia
1.0 0.2550 0.0012 0.0021
2.0 0.3150 0.0015 0.0027
3.0 0.4230 0.0020 0.0037
4.0 0.6300 0.0030 0.0057
5.0 0.0480 0.0002 0.0001
6.0 0.0002 0.0000 -0.0003
Analysis for Self wt. of Girder is done by taking it as an individual girder while analysis for SIDL, FPLL and LL are done by GRID analysis
using STAAD-Pro.
DEAD LOAD
1. Under self weight of the RCC Girder
Length of the girder = 21.800 m
2.13 0.90
w2 KN/m w1 KN/m w KN/m
0.400 0.400
21.000 M
21.800 M
d1 = 1.73
Distance Between Support, L = 21.000 m

Overhang = 0.400 m
UDL , w = 18.69 KN/m

Avg. , w1 = 22.99 KN/m
UDL , w2 = 27.30 KN/m
Supp. Reaction , R = 225.87 KN
Distance Moment Shear

S.No Section
m KN-m KN
1 Mid Span 0.5 L 1049.21 0.00
2 2 0.375 L 984.82 49.05
3 3 0.25 L 791.67 98.11
4 4 0.125 L 469.75 147.16
web widening-
2.6
5 End 469.75 147.16
web widening-
1.7 327.99 167.86
6 St
7 At support 0 -2.184 214.95
2. Due to self-weight of cast-in-situ deck slab

UDL , w = 19.200 KN/m 0 0
45 2.5
Avg. , w1 = 19.200 KN/m 14.593 0.811
UDL , w2 = 19.200 KN/m

S.No Section
m KN-m KN
1 Mid Span 0.5 L 1056.86 0.00
2 2 0.375 L 990.71 50.40
3 3 0.25 L 792.26 100.80
4 4 0.125 L 461.51 151.20
web widening-
2.6
5 End 461.51 151.20
web widening-
1.7
6 St 317.66 168.48
7 At support 0 -1.54 201.60

3. 'Additional weight due to green concrete
Weight of green concrete = 26 kN/m3

Additional weight due to green concrete = 26 -25 = 1 kN/m3
= 0.66 kN/m of girder
UDL , w = 0.660 KN/m ( On entire length of girder )
Avg. , w1 = 0.660 KN/m
UDL , w2 = 0.660 KN/m

S.No Section
m KN-m KN
1 Mid Span 0.5 L 36.33 0.00
2 2 0.375 L 34.06 1.73
3 3 0.25 L 27.23 3.47
4 4 0.125 L 15.86 5.20
web widening-
2.6
End
5 15.86 5.20
web widening-
6 1.7 10.92 5.79
St
At support 0.0 -0.05 6.93
7
4. 'Shuttering Load
As per clause 4.2.2.2.2 of IRC:87-1984 superimposed loads

= 3.6 kN/m2 = 9.36 kN/m
UDL , w = 9.360 KN/m ( On entire length of girder )
Avg. , w1 = 9.360
UDL , w2 = 9.360 KN/m
Supp. Reaction , R = 102.024 t

S.No Section
m KN-m KN
1 Mid Span 0.5 L 515.22 0.00
2 2 0.375 L 482.97 24.57
3 3 0.25 L 386.23 49.14
4 4 0.125 L 224.99 73.71
web widening-
2.6
End
5 224.99 73.71
web widening-
6 1.7 154.86 82.13
St
At support
7 0 -0.75 98.28
LIVE LOAD RESULTS
70RW load is governing for outer girder for ULS and SPV load is governing for inner girder for Live Load & SLS case.
Equivalent Moment and Equivalent Moment and

Outer Girder Inner Girder Shear due to torsion - Outer Shear due to torsion - Inner
Section Girder Girder
Moment Torsion Shear Moment Torsion Shear Moment Shear Moment Shear
kNm kNm kN kNm kNm kN kNm kN kNm kN
L/2 2077.00 0.00 143.00 3320.00 0.00 209.00 2077 143 3320 #REF!
3L/8 1933.00 0.00 213.00 3129.00 0.00 299.00 1933 213 3129 #REF!
L/4 1567.00 0.00 287.00 2540.00 0.00 415.00 1567 287 2540 #REF!
L/8 930.00 0.00 354.00 1516.00 0.00 541.00 930 354 1516 #REF!
Web Widening-End 930.00 0.00 354.00 1516.00 0.00 541.00 930 354 1516 #REF!
Web Widening-Start 653.00 0.00 379.00 1045.00 0.00 606.00 653 379 1045 #REF!
Support 38.00 0.00 379.00 41.00 0.00 606.00 38 379 41 #REF!
Note: impact factor need not be considered for SPV.

Typical Bending Moment Diagram for DL
Typical Shear Force Diagram for DL

Summary of Bending Moment & Shear Forces corresponding to Outer Girder for ULS Case
DL DL -Green Constructional Removal of

Distance from DL -Precast SIDL CB Surfacing Footpath LL Live Load
Postion on Deck Slab Weight of Slab Load Constr. Load
Start of Girder Girder
member
Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Max. SF Max. BM Torsion
m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN-m
L/2 10.500 0.00 1049.21 0.00 1056.86 0.00 36.33 0.00 515.22 14.00 638.00 0.00 233.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 515.22 143 2077 0.00
3L/8 7.875 49.05 984.82 50.40 990.71 1.73 34.06 24.57 482.97 43.00 600.00 11.00 219.00 0.00 0.00 24.57 482.97 213 1933 0.00
L/4 5.250 98.11 791.67 100.80 792.26 3.47 27.23 49.14 386.23 75.00 486.00 22.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 49.14 386.23 287 1567 0.00
L/8 2.625 147.16 469.75 151.20 461.51 5.20 15.86 73.71 224.99 101.00 288.00 33.00 102.00 0.00 0.00 73.71 224.99 354 930 0.00
Web Widening-End 2.625 147.16 469.75 151.20 461.51 5.20 15.86 73.71 224.99 101.00 288.00 33.00 102.00 0.00 0.00 73.71 224.99 354 930 0.00
Web Widening-Start 1.725 167.86 327.99 168.48 317.66 5.79 10.92 82.13 154.86 113.00 197.00 37.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 82.13 154.86 379 653 0.00
At support 0.000 214.95 -2.18 201.60 -1.54 6.93 -0.05 98.28 -0.75 113.00 2.00 44.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.28 -0.75 379 38 0.00
Summary of Bending Moment & Shear Forces corresponding to Inner Girder for SLS Case
DL -Precast DL -Green Constructional Removal of

Distance from DL -Deck Slab SIDL CB Surfacing Footpath LL Live Load
Postion on Girder Weight of Slab Load Constr. Load
Start of Girder
member
Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Shear BM Max. SF Max. BM Torsion
m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN KN-m KN-m
L/2 10.500 0.00 1049.21 0.00 1056.86 0.00 36.33 0.00 515.22 4.00 186.00 0.00 249.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 515.22 209.00 3320.00 0.00
3L/8 7.875 49.05 984.82 50.40 990.71 1.73 34.06 24.57 482.97 12.00 176.00 12.00 233.00 0.00 0.00 24.57 482.97 299.00 3129.00 0.00
L/4 5.250 98.11 791.67 100.80 792.26 3.47 27.23 49.14 386.23 22.00 146.00 24.00 187.00 0.00 0.00 49.14 386.23 415.00 2540.00 0.00
L/8 2.625 147.16 469.75 151.20 461.51 5.20 15.86 73.71 224.99 31.00 89.00 36.00 109.00 0.00 0.00 73.71 224.99 541.00 1516.00 0.00
Web Widening-End 2.625 147.16 469.75 151.20 461.51 5.20 15.86 73.71 224.99 31.00 89.00 36.00 109.00 0.00 0.00 73.71 224.99 541.00 1516.00 0.00
Web Widening-Start 1.725 167.86 327.99 168.48 317.66 5.79 10.92 82.13 154.86 35.00 61.00 40.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 82.13 154.86 606.00 1045.00 0.00
At support 0.000 214.95 -2.18 201.60 -1.54 6.93 -0.05 98.28 -0.75 35.00 1.00 48.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.28 -0.75 606.00 41.00 0.00
ANALYSIS FOR TEMPERATURE
INPUT DATA
Location - Sikarimedu - Tamilnadu
o
Maximum Air shade Temperature - 41.4 C
o
Minimum Air shade Temperature - 10.6 C
o
Mean of Max and Min Temp - 26 C
o
Bridge Temperature assumed - 36 C
2
Mean compressive stress fck = 35 N/mm
2 2
Elastic Modulus of concrete Ec = 32000 N/mm 3.20E+07 KN/m
Coefficient of Thermal expansion a = 1.20E-05
Sectional Properties of Composite Section
2
Area of Composite Section A = 1.5155 m
4
MOI of Composite Section Iz = 5E-01 m
CG of the Section Modulii of Section

3
From top of Slab yts = 0.573 m Zts = 0.957 m
3
From top of Girder ytg = 0.4 m Ztg = 1.553 m
3
From bottom of Girder ybg = 1.347 m Zbg = 0.408 m
Rising Gradient at Mid Span

3.20
A 17.8
1 0.15 4
2.56 0.09
B 0.240
0.150 0.25 0.16 0.01
C 0.100 0
h = 1.940 D 1.05
0.300
E 0.15
0
F
0.25 0.15
2.1
0.600
B (m) D A y from top Ay A y2 t At Aty

Portion
2 3 4
m m m m m m o
C 2o
m C m3 oC
A 3.20 0.24 0.768 0.120 0.092 0.011 10.180 7.818 0.938
B 1 0.15 0.150 0.315 0.047 0.015 1.360 0.204 0.064
C 0.65 0.1 0.065 0.423 0.028 0.012 0.080 0.005 0.002
D 0.3 1.05 0.315 1.015 0.320 0.325 0.000 0.000 0.000
E 0.45 0.15 0.068 1.640 0.111 0.182 0.000 0.000 0.000
F 0.6 0.25 0.150 1.815 0.272 0.494 1.050 0.158 0.286
SUM 1.516 0.870 1.038 8.185 1.291
d = Depth of respective member
B = Width of respective member
A = Area of respective zone
y = c.g. distance considered from top
t = Average temperature as per Temperature gradient of IRC 6
a = Coefficient of Thermal expansionas per IRC: 6-2017 Cl 215.4
a = 1.20E-05
 . A   . A. y  a . A.t
o
Eq .1
 A. y   . A. y
 o. 2
 A. y.t
 a. Eq.2
Eigen Stress 
f ci  Ec    y. a.t 
o

Above Equation Becomes
1.516 o - 0.870  = 9.8E-05 Eq .1
0.870 o - 1.038  = 1.5E-05 Eq.2
Multiplying eq. 1 by 0.87 & eq. 2 by 1.516 and substract 1 and 2
1.3179 o - 0.756  = 8.5E-05

1.318 o - 1.573  = 2.3E-05
0 0.817  = 6.2E-05
By solving the above two equations
Rotation of plane  = 7.59E-05
Strain at Top Fibre 0 = 1.08E-04
2
fck = 35 N/mm
2
Ec,slab = 3.20E+04 N/mm
3
Ec,Girder= 3.20E+04 N/mm
S.No y y.  t a. t fci
1 0 0.00E+00 17.8 2.14E-04 -3.368
2 0.24 1.82E-05 2.56 3.07E-05 1.901
3 1.94 1.47E-04 2.1 2.52E-05 -0.002
Note : fci is in Mpa, - ve is Compression
Falling Gradient at Mid Span

3.20 10.6
A
0.240 0.25
1.00 0.40 0.01
B 0.7
0.150
0.25 0.34 0.11
C 0.100 0.03 0.01
0
h= 1.940 D 1.050
0.3
0 0.100
0.25 0.32
E 0.150
F 0.8
0.250 0.25
6.6
0.6
B (m) D A y from top Ay A y2 t At Aty

Portion
2 3 4
m m m m m m C o 2o
m C m3 oC
A 3.20 0.24 0.768 0.120 0.092 0.011 5.498 4.222 0.507
B 1 0.15 0.150 0.315 0.047 0.015 0.518 0.078 0.024
C 0.65 0.1 0.065 0.423 0.028 0.012 0.182 0.012 0.005
D 0.3 1.05 0.315 1.015 0.320 0.325 0.000 0.000 0.000
E 0.45 0.15 0.068 1.640 0.111 0.182 0.560 0.038 0.062
F 0.6 0.25 0.150 1.815 0.272 0.494 3.700 0.555 1.007
SUM 1.516 0.870 1.038 4.905 1.605
Equation 1 and 2 becomes
1.516 o - 0.870  = 5.9E-05 Eq .1
0.870 o - 1.038  = 1.9E-05 Eq.2

Multiplying eq. 1 by 0.87 & eq. 2 by 1.516 and substract 1 and 2
1.3179 eo - 0.756 q = 5.1E-05

1.318 eo - 1.573 q = 2.9E-05
0 0.817 q = 2.2E-05
Rotation of plane  = 3E-05

Strain at Top Fibre o = 5E-05
S.No y y.  t a. t fci
1 0 0.00E+00 10.6 1.27E-04 -2.333
2 0.24 6.46E-06 0.336 4.03E-06 1.401
3 1.94 5.22E-05 6.6 7.92E-05 -2.469
Note : fci is in Mpa, - ve is Tension
2
Max permissible tensile stress due to temperature = 2.80 N/mm
DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE FOR COMPOSITE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION-MID SECTION
Shrinkage parameters are calculated for beam and slab to account for the differential shrinkage strain.
The hogging restrain moment Mcs due to differential shrinakge is given by
Fcs = 430.444 KN
M cs  ( diff )( E cf ) Acf (d cent )a

= 192.10 KN-m
Area of Composite Section A = 1.516 m2

MOI of Composite Section Iz = 0.549 m4

3
3
3
Stresses
Stress due to Moments in composite Stress due Compressive force in Net Stresses
SNO Location Stress due to Direct Tensile section (N/mm2) composite section (N/mm2) (N/mm2)
Force in Deck Slab(N/mm2)
1 Top of Slab -0.5605 0.2006 0.2840 -0.0758
2 Top of Girder 0.0000 0.1237 0.2840 0.4077
3 Bottom of Girder 0.0000 0.4712 0.2840 0.7552

a 
I  e = 0.41

 = 2.18
Precast Girder In-situ Slab

Compressive strength fck = 35 35 N/mm2
2
Cross sectional area of concrete Ac = 747500 768000 mm
Perimeter of the cross section u = 4636 2480 mm
2 Ac
Notional size of the cross section(ho) u = 322.5 619.4 mm
Coefficient depending on notional size Kh = 0.74 0.70 Refer Table 6.7 of IRC:112-2020
Relative humidity RH = 80 80 %
 cd
Drying Shrinkage strain = 4.89E-04 4.89E-04
Final value of Drying shrinakge strain =  cd , = 3.64E-04 3.42E-04
Autogenous shrinkage strain =  ca = 4.50E-05 4.50E-05
Total Shrinkage strain =  cd  ca = 4.09E-04 3.87E-04
Time Dependent Shrinkage of Precast Girder
Autogenous shrinkage with time t = 28 days
 ca (t )   as ( t ).  ca = 2.94E-05 3200
1000
240
 as ( t )  1  exp(  0 . 2 t ) = 0.653
150
Drying Shrinkage with time ts = 3 days
 ( t )   ds ( t , t s ). k h . cd
100 dcent= 446.3 mm
cd = 3.55E-05
1050 300
(t  ts )
ds(t, ts ) 
(t  ts)  0.04 ho
3 = 0.097
150
250
600
Total Shrinkage at time  girder,t = 6.48E-05
 diff =  slab ,   ( girder ,   girder ,t )

= 4.31E-05
DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE FOR COMPOSITE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION-END SECTION
Shrinkage parameters are calculated for beam and slab to account for the differential shrinkage strain.
The hogging restrain moment Mcs due to differential shrinakge is given by
Fcs = 375.983 KN
M cs  ( diff )( E cf ) Acf (d cent )a
= 218.81 KN-m
Area of Composite Section A = 1.5155 m2

MOI of Composite Section Iz = 0.54896752 m4

3
3
3
Stresses
SNO Location Stress due to Direct Tensile Force Stress due to Moments in composite Stress due Compressive force in Net Stresses
1 Top of Slab -0.4896 0.2285 0.2481 -0.0129
2 Top of Girder 0.0000 0.1409 0.2481 0.3889
3 Bottom of Girder 0.0000 0.5367 0.2481 0.7848

I  e
a  = 0.41


= 2.18
Precast Girder In-situ Slab

Compressive strength fck = 35 35 N/mm2
2
Cross sectional area of concrete Ac = 1092000 768000 mm
u 5000 2480 mm
Perimeter of the cross section =
Notional size of the cross section(ho) = 436.8 619.4 mm
Coefficient depending on notional size Kh = 0.72 0.7 Refer Table 6.7 of IRC:112-2020
Relative humidity RH = 80 80 %
Drying Shrinkage strain = 2.76E-04 2.76E-04
 , 
Final value of Drying shrinakge strain = cd
= 1.98E-04 1.93E-04
Autogenous shrinkage strain = = 4.50E-05 4.50E-05
Total Shrinkage strain  cd   ca = = 2.43E-04 2.38E-04
Time Dependent Shrinkage of Precast Girder
Autogenous shrinkage with time t = 28 days
 ca (t )   as ( t ).  ca = 2.94E-05 3200
1000
240
 as ( t )  1  exp(  0 . 2 t) = 0.653
150
Drying Shrinkage with time ts = 3 days
 cd ( t )   ds ( t , t s ). k h . cd
60 dcent= 582 mm
= 1.27E-05
1490
(t  ts )
ds (t, ts ) 
(t  ts)  0.04 ho3 = 0.064
600
Total Shrinkage at time = 4.20E-05
 slab ,   ( girder ,   girder , t )

= = 3.77E-05
Table 3.2 Partial Safety Factor For Verification of Structural Strength: Ultimate Limit State -Refer Table B2 of IRC:6-2017
Basic
Loads
Combination
Dead Laod+SIDL except wearing course 1.35
Wearing Course only 1.75
CWLL and Associate load and FPLL ( Service ) 1.50
Table 3.3 Partial Safety Factor For Verification of Servicibilty Limit State
-Refer Table B3 of IRC:6-2017
Rare Frequent Quasi-Permanent
Loads
Combination Combination Combination
Dead Load+SIDL 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wearing course 1.20 1.20 1.20
Shrinkage Creep Effect 1.00 1.00 1.00
CWLL and Associate load and FPLL 1.00 0.75 0.00
ULS DESIGN
Material Properties
Grade of Concrete - M- 35
Grade of Reinforcement - Fe- 500
Elastic Modulus of Concrete - 32000 N/mm2

Elastic Modulus of Steel - 200000 N/mm2
Design Constants
fy - 500 N/mm2
fyd - 435 N/mm2 As per Clause 6.2.2, IRC:112-2020
fck - 35 N/mm2
fctm - 2.8 N/mm2 As per Table 6.5, IRC:112-2020
fcd - 15.63 N/mm2
Clear Cover to Reinforcement = 40 mm
LOADINGS
ULS Moments
BM(KN-m)
Web
S.No Type of Loading g
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8 Widening
Start
1 DL 1.35 2106.07 1975.54 1583.93 931.26 645.65
2 SIDL 1.35 638.00 600.00 486.00 288.00 197.00
3 Surfacing 1.75 233.00 219.00 175.00 102.00 70.00
4 Footpath 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 Live Load 1.50 2077.00 1933.00 1567.00 930.00 653.00
Total Design Moment MED 7227.75 6759.73 5451.16 3219.51 2239.57
*g  Partial safety factor
bf= 3200 hfcd cu3= 0.0035
240 Df l.xu
xu
N 1940 A
Ast 0.87fy s
300
At Midspan (L/2)
Dis. from
Reinforcement No of bars Dia(mm) bottom of
girder(mm)
1st Layer 4 32 68
2nd Layer 4 32 132
3rd Layer 5 32 196
4th Layer 5 32 260
5th Layer 0 32 324
6th Layer 0 32 388
7th Layer 0 32 452
8th Layer 0 25 513
Total no. of bars 18
2
Area of reinforcement provided Ast = 14476.5 mm Ok
C.G. of reinforcement from bottom of girder = 171.11 mm
Therefore ,deff = 1.769 m
b f .h f cd . l x  0 . 87 . f y .A st
Asssuming N.A lies in the flange
h = 1.00
lxu = 125.88 mm N.A lies inside the flange
l = 0.8
xu = 157.35 mm
d eff
f
xu,max = = 1090.94 mm under reinforced section
yk
(1  )
g s Es . cu 3
Check for Depth Required
MED = Mu,lim
xu ,max xu ,max
7.23E+09 = lh. f cd . .(1  0.4. ).b f .d 2
d d
d reqd = 601.920 mm OK
Area of Reinforcement required
0 .87 . Ast . f y
M u  0 .87 . f y . Ast .( d  )
2 .b f .h . f cd
2
Ast,Required = 9620.68 mm
f ctm
0.26. .bt .d eff
As,min = f yk
= 772.65 mm2
bt Mean width of tension Zone
0 . 0013 .b t .d eff = 689.87 mm2
Moment Resisting capacity MR = 10742.81 KN-m Safe
At SECTION 2-2 (3L/8)
Dis. from
girder(mm)
1st Layer 4 32 68
2nd Layer 4 32 132
3rd Layer 5 32 196
4th Layer 5 32 260
5th Layer 0 32 324
6th Layer 0 32 388
7th Layer 0 32 452
8th Layer 0 25 513
2

b f .h f cd . l x  0 . 87 . f y .A st
h = 1.00
l = 0.8
xu = 157.35 mm 0 . 0013 .b t .d eff
d eff
xu,max = (1 
f yk
)
= 1090.94 mm under reinforced section
g s Es . cu 3
MED = Mu,lim
xu ,max xu ,max
6.76E+09 = lh. f cd . .(1  0.4. ).b f .d 2
d d
0 .87 . Ast . f y
M u  0 .87 . f y . Ast .( d  )
2 .b f .h . f cd
2
As,min = f ctm
0.26.
f yk
.bt .d eff = 772.65 mm2
0 . 0013 .b t .d eff = 689.87 mm2
At SECTION 3-3 (L/4)
Dis. from
girder(mm)
1st Layer 4 32 68
2nd Layer 4 32 132
3rd Layer 5 32 196
4th Layer 5 32 260
5th Layer 0 32 324
6th Layer 0 32 388
7th Layer 0 32 452
8th Layer 0 25 513
2

b f .h f cd . l x  0 . 87 . f y .A st
h = 1.00
l = 0.8
xu = 157.35 mm
d eff
f yk
(1  )
xu,max = g s Es . cu 3 = 1090.94 mm under reinforced section
MED = Mu,lim
xu ,max xu ,max
5.45E+09 = lh. f cd . .(1  0.4. ).b f .d 2
d d
0 .87 . Ast . f y
M u  0 .87 . f y . Ast .( d  )
2.b f .h . f cd
2
As,min =
0.26.
f ctm
.bt .d eff
= 772.65 mm2
f yk
0 . 0013 .b t .d eff
= 689.87 mm2
At SECTION 4-4 (L/8)
Dis. from
girder(mm)
1st Layer 4 32 68
2nd Layer 4 32 132
3rd Layer 0 32 196
4th Layer 0 32 260
5th Layer 0 32 324
6th Layer 0 32 388
7th Layer 0 32 452
8th Layer 0 25 513
Total no. of bars 8
2
Asssuming N.A lies in the flange b f .h f cd . l x  0 . 87 . f y .A st
h = 1.00
l = 0.8
xu = 69.93 mm
d eff
f yk
(1  )
xu,max = g s Es . cu 3 = 1134.80 mm under reinforced section
MED = Mu,lim
xu ,max xu ,max
3.22E+09 = lh. f cd . .(1  0.4. ).b f .d 2
d d
0.87 . Ast . f y
M u  0 .87 . f y . Ast .( d  )
2.b f .h . f cd
2
f ctm
0.26. .bt .d eff
f yk
As,min =
= 803.71 mm2
0 . 0013 .b t .d eff
= 717.60 mm2
At Web Widening
Dis. from
girder(mm)
1st Layer 4 32 68
2nd Layer 4 32 132
3rd Layer 0 32 196
4th Layer 0 32 260
5th Layer 0 32 324
6th Layer 0 32 388
7th Layer 0 32 452
8th Layer 0 25 513
Total no. of bars 8
2
Asssuming N.A lies in the flange b f .h f cd . l x  0 . 87 . f y . A st
h = 1.00
l = 0.8
xu = 69.93 mm
xu,max = d eff
f
= 1134.80 mm under reinforced section
yk
(1  )
g s Es .  cu 3
MED = Mu,lim
2.24E+09 =

xu ,max xu ,max
lh. f cd . .(1  0.4. ).b f .d 2
d d
0 .87 . Ast . f y
M u  0 .87 . f y . Ast .( d  )
2.b f .h . f cd
2
f ctm
0.26. .bt .d eff
f yk
As,min =
0 . 0013 .b t .d eff
= 803.71 mm2
= 717.60 mm2
Summary
Web
SNO Description unit L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8 Widening
start
1 Design Bending Moment MED KN-m 7228 6760 5451 3220 2240
2 Depth of Nuetral Axis xu mm 157.35 157.35 157.35 69.93 69.93
3 Critical Depth of N.A xu,max mm 1090.94 1090.94 1090.94 1134.80 1134.80
Under Under Under Under Under
Check for section
4 reinforced reinforced reinforced reinforced reinforced
Total Depth required D reqd mm 721.92 680.24 656.26 630.63 613.37

5
6 Total Depth Provided mm 1940.00 1940.00 1940.00 1940.00 1940.00
7 Area of Steel Required Ast mm 2
9620.68 8983.30 7212.18 4061.34 2816.82
8 Torsional Moment tED KN-m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
A m2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.9
u m 8.092 8.092 8.092 8.092 7.738
tef,i m 0.187 0.187 0.187 0.187 0.240
AK 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5
uk 7.937 7.937 7.937 7.937 7.415
Z m 1.513 1.513 1.513 1.513 1.460
mm2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 Area of Steel Reqd Ast (Bending +Torsion) mm3 9620.7 8983.3 7212.2 4061.3 2816.8
10 Area of Steel Provided mm2 14476.5 14476.5 14476.5 6434.0 6434.0
11 Moment of Resistance MR KN-m 10742.81 10742.81 10742.81 5071.47 5071.47

12 Check for section OK OK OK OK OK
Side face Reinforcement Refer clause No. IRC 112 6.5.4.(4)
Area of surface reinforcement As,sur should not be less than 0.01Act,ext, where Act,ext is the area of cover portion outside the stirrups
As,sur = 0.01 Act,ext = 680 mm2
Providing 9 No's 10 Dia = 706.86 mm2 on one side face

Maximum spacing = 200 mm
Provided Spacing = 150 mm
STRESS CHECK FOR SELF WEIGHT OF RCC GIRDER+ WEIGHT OF DECK SLAB
SLS MOMENTS
BM(KN-m)
S.No Type of Loading g Web
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
Total Design Moment MED - Girder+Deck Slab 2106.07 1975.54 1583.93 931.26 645.65
Web
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
Design Moment MED KN-m 2106.07 1975.54 1583.93 931.26 645.65
mm2 14476.5 14476.5 14476.5 6434.0 6434.0

Area of steel Provided Ast
2
Ac m 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9
u m 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.7
ho=2Ac/u 388.6 388.6 388.6 388.6 495.7
Age of Concrete in days considered t 25550.0 25550.0 25550.0 25550.0 25550.0
Age of Concrete at loading to 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
t-t0 25522.0 25522.0 25522.0 25522.0 25522.0

  RH 
18 
 H  1.51  1.2   ho  250
  RHo   1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1350.1
RH
1
 RH  1  100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.1.3 ho
0.3
 t  to 
 (t, to )    1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
 H  (t  to ) 
1
 (t o )  0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.1  t o 0.20
18 . 78
 ( f cm )  3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
f cm
o  o   RH . ( f cm ). (t o ) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

 t , t o    c t , t o . o 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3
Ec,eff 13586.0 13586.0 13586.0 13586.0 13739.3

Modular Ratio m 14.72 14.72 14.72 14.72 14.56
Depth of N.A xu mm 389.55 389.55 389.55 272.70 271.32
Moment of Inertia of Concrete section IC mm4 4.10E+09 4.10E+09 4.10E+09 1.47E+09 1.46E+09
Moment of Inertia of transformed area of steel IS mm4 1.88E+10 1.88E+10 1.88E+10 1.13E+10 1.14E+10
Modulus of Section of Concrete ZC mm3 1.05E+07 1.05E+07 1.05E+07 5.38E+06 5.39E+06
Modulus of Section of Steel ZS mm3 1.65E+07 1.65E+07 1.65E+07 8.54E+06 8.55E+06
Cracked Moment of Inertia ICR mm4 2.29E+10 2.29E+10 2.29E+10 1.28E+10 1.28E+10
Actual Stresses
Top of Slab fck' N/mm2 0 0 0 0 0
Top of Girder fck'' N/mm2 2.43 2.28 1.83 1.35 0.94
At C.G of Steel fy' N/mm2 104.83 98.33 78.84 96.55 66.91

At bottom fibre of Steel fy'' N/mm2 114.32 107.23 85.98 98.88 68.53
STRESS CHECK FOR GREEN WEIGHT OF CONCRETE
SLS MOMENTS
BM(KN-m)
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
1 Green weight of slab 1 36.33 34.06 27.23 15.86 10.92
Web
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
Area of steel Provided Ast mm2 14476.5 14476.5 14476.5 6434.0 3217.0
Ac mm2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9
u mm 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.7
ho=2Ac/u 388.6 388.6 388.6 388.6 495.7
 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
t-t0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0

  RH 
18 
 H  1.51  1.2   ho  250
  RHo  
 1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1350.1
RH
1
100
 RH  1  0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.1.3 ho
0.3
 t  to 
 (t, to )    1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
 H  (t  to ) 
1
 (t o )  0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.1  t o 0.20
18 . 78
 ( f cm )  3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
f cm
o 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

 t , t o    c t , t o . o
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Ec,eff 23728.0 23728.0 23728.0 23728.0 24175.7
Modular Ratio m 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.43 8.27
Depth of N.A xu mm 305.45 305.45 305.45 211.32 151.37
Moment of Inertia of transformed area of steel
IS mm4 2.17E+10 2.17E+10 2.17E+10 1.24E+10 7.05E+09
Actual Stresses

STRESS CHECK FOR CONSTRUCTION LOAD
SLS MOMENTS
BM(KN-m)
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
1 Construction Load 1 515.22 482.97 386.23 224.99 154.86
Web
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
Ac mm2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9
u mm 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.7
ho=2Ac/u 388.6 388.6 388.6 388.6 495.7
 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
t-t0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0

  RH  
18
 H  1.51  1.2   ho  250
  RHo   1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1350.1
RH
1
 RH 100
 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.1.3 ho
0.3
 t  to 
 (t, to )    1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
 H  (t  to ) 
1
 (t o ) 
0.1  t o 0.20 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
18 . 78
 ( f cm )  3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
f cm
o 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

 t , t o    c t , t o . o
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Ec,eff 24791.6 24791.6 24791.6 24791.6 25200.0
Modular Ratio m 8.07 8.07 8.07 8.07 7.94
Depth of N.A xu mm 299.55 299.55 299.55 207.08 148.42
IS mm4 2.19E+10 2.19E+10 2.19E+10 1.25E+10 7.08E+09
4
Cracked Moment of Inertia ICR mm 2.54E+10 2.54E+10 2.54E+10 1.37E+10 7.60E+09
Actual Stresses

STRESS CHECK FOR SIDL
Stresses are calculated using Cracked section analysis
SLS MOMENTS
BM(KN-m)
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
1 SIDL 1.00 186.00 176.00 146.00 89.00 61.00
2 Surfacing 1.20 249.00 233.00 187.00 109.00 75.00
2 Foot Path 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Web
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
Ac mm2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9
u mm 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.7
2Ac/u 388.6 388.6 388.6 388.6 495.7
 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.83
25550.0 25550.0 25550.0 25550.0 25550.0

Age of Concrete in days considered t
63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0

Age of Concrete at loading to
t-t0 25487.0 25487.0 25487.0 25487.0 25487.0

  RH  
18
H  1.51  1.2   ho  250
 
RHo  
 1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1112.5 1350.1
RH
1
 RH  1  100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.1.3 ho
0.3
 t  to 
 (t, to )    1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
 H  (t  to ) 
1
 (t o ) 
0.1  t o 0.20
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
18 . 78
 ( f cm ) 
f cm
2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8
o
0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
 t , t o    c t , t o . o
1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0
Ec,eff 15453.5 15453.5 15453.5 15453.5 15610.0
Modular Ratio m 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.81
Depth of N.A xu mm 400.32 400.32 400.32 284.52 283.21
IS mm4 2.71E+10 2.71E+10 2.71E+10 1.56E+10 1.56E+10
Actual Stresses
Top of Slab fck' N/mm2 0.47 0.44 0.36 0.28 0.19
STRESS CHECK FOR LIVE LOAD
SLS MOMENTS
BM(KN-m)
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
1 Live Load 1 3320.00 3129.00 2540.00 1516.00 1045.00
Web
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
Ac mm2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9
u mm 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.7
2Ac/u 388.6 388.6 388.6 388.6 495.7
 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0
Ec,eff 15453.5 15453.5 15453.5 15453.5 15610.0
Modular Ratio m 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.81
Depth of N.A xu mm 400.32 400.32 400.32 284.52 283.21
IS mm4 2.71E+10 2.71E+10 2.71E+10 1.56E+10 1.56E+10
Actual Stresses
Top of Slab fck' N/mm2 3.20 3.01 2.44 1.91 1.32

CHECK FOR DEFLECTION Refer 12.4.1 IRC 112-2020
Allowable deflection due to Vehicular load = = 26.3 mm
Deflection due to LL from STAAD = 6.3 mm < 26.25

OK
Allowable Stresses
Concrete 16.8 N/mm2

Steel 300 N/mm2
Desciption
Stress Location
Top of Slab fck'
Top of Girder fck''
At C.G of Steel fy'
At bottom fibre of Steel fy''
LC-1 STAGE 1 DL + Green Weight of Slab + Construction Load At end of 35 days
SLS - RARE L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8 Web Widening

Load fck'' fy' fy'' fck'' fy' fy'' fck'' fy' fy'' fck'' fy' fy'' fck'' f y' fy''
LOAD
Factor N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
DEAD LOAD 1 2.43 104.83 114.32 2.28 98.33 107.23 1.83 78.84 85.98 1.35 96.55 98.88 0.94 66.91 68.53
DL-Green Weight 1 0.05 1.76 1.91 0.05 1.65 1.79 0.04 1.32 1.43 0.03 1.62 1.66 0.08 1.23 1.27
Construction Load 1 0.75 24.93 27.02 0.71 23.37 25.33 0.56 18.69 20.25 0.42 22.94 23.47 0.88 18.47 18.98
Resultant Stress 3.24 131.52 143.24 3.04 123.35 134.35 2.43 98.85 107.66 1.80 121.11 124.00 1.90 86.62 88.78
CHECK SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
LC-2 STAGE 2 DL - Construction Load + SIDL + LL At end of 63 Days

Load fck' fck'' fy' fy'' fck' fck'' fy' fy'' fck' fck'' fy' fy'' fck' fck'' fy' fy'' fck' fck'' fy' fy''
LOAD
DL+Construction 1 0 3.19 129.76 141.33 0 2.99 121.70 132.56 0 2.40 97.53 106.23 0 1.77 119.49 122.35 0 1.81 85.39 87.51
-ve'Construction
Load 1 0.00 -0.75 -24.93 -27.02 0.00 -0.71 -23.37 -25.33 0.00 -0.56 -18.69 -20.25 0.00 -0.42 -22.94 -23.47 0.00 -0.38 -30.23 -30.23
SIDL 1 0.47 0.19 20.64 22.20 0.44 0.18 19.40 21.82 0.36 0.14 15.77 17.74 0.28 0.04 19.58 20.84 0.19 0.03 13.45 14.31
Live Load 1 3.20 1.28 141.36 152.01 3.01 1.21 133.23 149.89 2.44 0.98 108.15 121.67 1.91 0.30 135.06 143.74 1.32 0.20 93.07 99.05
Differential
Shrinkage 1 -0.08 0.41 0.76 0.76 -0.10 0.37 0.67 0.67 -0.10 0.37 0.67 0.67 -0.10 0.37 0.67 0.67 -0.10 0.37 0.67 0.67
Resultant Stress 3.59 4.31 267.59 289.3 3.35 4.04 251.64 279.62 2.70 3.32 203.44 226.07 2.09 2.06 251.86 264.13 1.42 2.03 162.35 171.31
LC-3 Effect of Temperature Rise & Diff.Shrinkage Without CWLL

Load fck' fy ' fck' f y' fck' fy ' fck' fy' fck' f y'
LOAD
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
Temperature Rise 1 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020
Differential
Shrinkage 1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 0.67 -0.10 -0.10 0.67
Resultant Stress 4.73 126.23 4.53 118.40 3.99 95.28 4.20 116.03 2.93 81.04
LC-4 Effect of Temperature Rise & Diff.Shrinkage With CWLL

LOAD
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
CWLL 1 3.20 141.36 3.01 133.23 2.44 108.15 1.91 135.06 1.32 93.07
Temperature Rise 0.6 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020
Differential
Shrinkage 1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67
LC-5 Effect of Temperature Fall& Diff.Shrinkage Without CWLL

LOAD
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
Temperature fall 1 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47
Differential
1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67
Shrinkage
LC-6 Effect of Temperature Fall& Diff.Shrinkage With CWLL

LOAD
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
CWLL 1 3.20 141.36 3.01 133.23 2.44 108.15 1.91 135.06 1.32 93.07
Temperature fall 0.6 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47
Differential
1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67
Shrinkage
LC-7 Effect of Temperature Rise & Diff.Shrinkage
SLS - QUASI PERMENANT L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8 Web Widening

LOAD
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
Temperature Rise 0.5 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020 1.90 -0.0020
Differential
Shrinkage 1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 0.67 -0.10 -0.10 0.67
LC-8 Effect of Temperature Fall & Diff.Shrinkage
SLS - QUASI PERMENANT L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8 Web Widening

LOAD
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
Temperature fall 0.5 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47
Differential
1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 0.67 -0.10 -0.10 0.67
Shrinkage
LC-9 Effect of Temperature Rise & Diff.Shrinkage With CWLL

fck' fy ' fck' f y' fck' fy ' fck' fy' fck' f y'
LOAD Load Factor
N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
CWLL 0.75 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Temperature Rise 1 1.97 -0.0021 1.97 -0.0021 1.97 -0.0021 1.97 -0.0021 1.97 -0.0021
Differential
Shrinkage 1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 0.67 -0.10 -0.10 0.67
LC-10 Effect of Temperature Fall& Diff.Shrinkage With CWLL

fck' fy ' fck' f y' fck' fy ' fck' fy' fck' f y'
LOAD Load Factor
N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
DL+SIDL 1 2.90 125.47 2.72 117.73 2.19 94.61 1.62 116.13 1.13 80.36
CWLL 0.75 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47 1.40 -2.47
Temperature fall 1 1.44 -2.49 1.44 -2.49 1.44 -2.49 1.44 -2.49 1.44 -2.49
Differential
1 -0.08 0.76 -0.10 0.67 -0.10 0.67 0.67 -0.10 -0.10 0.67
Shrinkage
CRACK WIDTH CALCULATION
Web
SNO Description unit L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
1 Design Bending Moment MED KN-m 2590.9 2431.1 1954.3 1151.1 796.6
2 Total Moment KN-m 2590.9 2431.1 1954.3 1151.1 796.6
3 Cross sectional width of web mm 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 600.0
4 Overall Depth considered D mm 1940.00 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0
5 Effective Depth deff mm 1768.89 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9
6 Area of Steel Provided mm2 14476.46 14476.5 14476.5 6434.0 6434.0
7 Percentage of Steel provided Pt % 0.0092 0.0092 0.0092 0.0041 0.0034
8 Ac mm2 1569500 1569500 1569500 1569500 1914000
9 u mm 8077.3 8077.3 8077.3 8077.3 7722.6
10 2Ac/u 388.6 388.6 388.6 388.6 495.7
16 Ec,eff 15453.5 15453.5 15453.5 15453.5 15610.0
17 Modular Ratio m 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.81
18
k  ( 2 * Pt .m  ( Pt .m) )  Pt .m
2
0.38 0.38 0.38 0.28 0.25
19 Depth of N.A xu mm 678.57 678.57 678.57 489.95 448.53
20 Moment of Inertia of Concrete section IC mm4 2.41E+09 2.41E+09 2.41E+09 9.09E+08 1.41E+09
21 Moment of Inertia of transformed area of steel IS mm4 1.72E+10 1.72E+10 1.72E+10 1.05E+10 1.12E+10
22 Modulus of Section of Concrete ZC mm3 3.56E+06 3.56E+06 3.56E+06 1.85E+06 3.14E+06
23 Modulus of Section of Steel ZS mm3 1.36E+07 1.36E+07 1.36E+07 7.26E+06 7.52E+06
24 Cracked Moment of Inertia ICR mm4 1.96E+10 1.96E+10 1.96E+10 1.14E+10 1.26E+10
25 Stress in Concrete sc N/mm2 6.92 6.50 5.22 3.81 2.21
27 Stress in Steel ssc N/mm2 143.95 135.08 108.58 128.77 83.31
Sr,max - Maximum Crack spacing

sm - Mean Strain in Reinforcement
cm - Mean Strain in Concrete
Web
L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
(from Quasi
Tensile Stress in Steel permenant ssc N/mm2 143.95 135.08 108.58 128.77 83.31
combination)
Factor dependent on duration of loading Kt 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Mean value of concrete tensile stress fct,eff 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80
Effective reinforcement ratio rp.eff 0.115 0.115 0.115 0.050 0.025
ae 6.250 6.250 6.250 6.250 6.250
Modulus of Elasticity Es 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
Area of Steel Provided As mm2 14476 14476 14476 6434 6434
Clear Cover to reinforcement c mm 40 40 40 40 40
Maximum dia of bar j mm 32 32 32 32 32
Effective depth of concrete in tension h mm 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0
Effective depth of section d mm 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9
Depth of Nuetral axis x mm 678.57 678.57 678.57 489.95 448.53
2.5(h-d)
Minimum of (h-x)/3 hc,eff mm 420.48 420.48 420.48 427.78 427.78
h/2
n11 2  n 2 2 2
Equivalent Diameter jeq mm 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00
n11  n 2 2
AC,eff mm2 126143 126143 126143 128333 256667
   s sc  K t
r
f ct , eff
1  a e .r p , eff  s sc 0.00062 0.00057 0.00044 0.00046 0.00009
sm cm
= p , eff

0.6.
E Es
s 0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 0.0004 0.0002
For the case of Deformed bars associated with pure bending
0.17.
Maximum Crack spacing Sr,max = 3.4c  mm 183.40 183.40 183.40 244.51 353.01
r p ,ef f
Crack width S .(   )
r , max sm cm
Wk mm 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.09
Permissible Crack width mm 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
CHECK FOR LONGITUDINAL SHEAR, INTERFACE SHEAR
Material Properties 3200
Grade of Concrete - M 35 1000 240
Grade of Reinforcement - Fe 500
Elastic Modulus of Concrete - 32000 N/mm2
Elastic Modulus of Steel - 200000 N/mm22
fy = 500 N/mm 1700
fyd = 435 N/mm2 300
fck = 35 N/mm2
fctm = 2.80 N/mm2

fcd = 15.63 N/mm2
Web
S.No Type of Loading g* L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8
Widening
1 Dead Load-Girder 1.35 0.00 49.05 98.11 147.16 167.86
2 Dead Load-Slab 1.35 0.00 50.40 100.80 151.20 168.48
3 SIDL 1.35 14.00 43.00 75.00 101.00 113.00
4 Surfacing 1.75 0.00 11.00 22.00 33.00 37.00
5 FPLL 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Live Load 1.5 143.00 213.00 287.00 354.00 379.00
TOTAL 233.40 531.06 838.78 1127.89 1239.86
*g- Partial Safety factor
SNO Description unit L/2 3L/8 L/4 L/8 Deff

1 Ultimate Shear Force (VEd) KN 233.4 531.1 838.8 1127.9 1239.9
Torsional Moment tED KN-m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
A m2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.9
u m 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.7
tef,i m 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
AK 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5
uk 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.4
Z m 1.513 1.513 1.513 1.513 1.460
Torsional shear stress KN/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Due to Tosion VED,t = tt,i. tef. Z
KN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Shear Force + Torsional Shear 233.4 531.1 838.8 1127.9 1239.9
2 Ast provided mm2 14476.5 14476.5 14476.5 6434.0 6434.0
3 Total Depth mm 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0 1940.0
4 Effective depth mm 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9 1768.9
Cross sectional width of web mm 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 600.0
5 Percentage of steel provided (r1)
As 1
r1 = b w . d eff <=0.02 % 0.0249 0.0249 0.0249 0.0111 0.0055
6 Actual shear stress N/mm2 0.401 0.912 1.441 1.938 1.065

Max shear capacity,
f ck
7 0.123 f ck (1  ) N/mm2 4.192 4.192 4.192 4.192 4.192
310
8 Depth Check for Shear Resistance OK OK OK OK OK
200
9 K= 1 
d ef f <=2.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
10 ʋmin = 0 . 031 . K 3 / 2
. fck 1/ 2
N/mm2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.33 2
0.12 K (80 r1 fck) N/mm 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4
11 scp = NEd / Ac <= 0.2 fcd 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
V Rd.c = 0.12 K 80.r1. fck 0.33  0.15.s cp .bw .d eff 345.2 345.2 345.2 264.1 420.3
12 N/mm2
V Rd,c =  min  0.15s cp .bw .d eff 150.3 150.3 150.3 150.3 300.7
13 Check for Shear Reinforcement Not Required Required Required Required Required
Shear Force VEd KN/mm2 233.4 531.1 838.8 1127.9 1239.9
cot  = (< 1 cot` <2.5) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
fywd = 0.8fy/1.15 435.0 435.0 435.0 435.0 435.0
Provide Shear Reinforcement
Legged 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Diameter of Bar mm 10.0 10.0 10.0 12.0 12.0
Legged 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
14 Area of Shear Reinf, Asw mm2 157.1 157.1 157.1 226.2 226.2
Lever arm Z = 0.9 * d mm 1592.0 1592.0 1592.0 1592.0 1592.0
Spacing of shear Reinforcement required
15 Asw S= mm 1165.2 512.1 324.2 347.2 315.9

VRd .s  .z. f ywd . cot
s
Minimum R/F ratio =

0 . 072 . f ck 
16 f
0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043
yk
Asw
17 Shear R/F ratio = ( s.b w . sin a ) 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001
Maximum Spacing Smax = 0.75 d mm 1326.7 1326.7 1326.7 1326.7 1326.7

Governing Spacing of Shear R/F mm 1165.2 512.1 324.2 347.2 315.9
Provided Spacing of Shear R/F mm 250.0 250.0 250.0 200.0 200.0
18 Check for Spacing SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
INTERFACE SHEAR Refer 10.3.4 IRC:112-2020
Design Shear at Interface

Transverse Shear VEd KN 233 531 839 1128 1240
Inner lever arm of composite section Z m 1.592 1.592 1.592 1.592 1.592
Interface width bi mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Interface area mm2 1000000 1000000 1000000 1000000 1000000
Proportion of Longitudinal tensile force carried in top
 =
slab 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 .V ED 2
Interface Shear Stress VEdi N/mm 0.147 0.334 0.527 0.708 0.779
Z .bi
Interface shear capacity at section VRdi

Factor dependent on interface roughness m = 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Stress resulting from forces normal to interface sn Mpa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Angle of reinforcement to interface a degree 90 90 90 90 90
Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear n = 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5.v. f cd
VRdi N/mm2 4.03 4.03 4.03 4.03 4.03
OK OK OK OK OK
Minimum reinforcement Aci mm2 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300
Legged 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Legged 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Spacing of Reinforcement mm 250 250 250 200 200
Area of Shear Reinf, Asw mm2 1256.6 1256.6 1256.6 2261.9 2261.9
SHEAR IN FLANGE PORTION

At support At L/8 At L/4 At 3L/8 At L/2
S.No Type of Loading g* BM(KN-m)
1 Dead Load-Girder 1.35 -2.18 469.75 791.67 984.82 1049.21
2 Dead Load-Slab 1.35 -1.54 461.51 792.26 990.71 1056.86
3 SIDL 1.35 2.00 288.00 486.00 600.00 638.00
4 Surfacing 1.75 0.00 102.00 175.00 219.00 233.00
5 Live Load 1.5 38.00 930.00 1567.00 1933.00 2077.00
TOTAL 54.68 3219.51 5451.16 6759.73 7227.75
*g- Partial Safety factor
Longitudinal shear stress across junction of flange with web VEDf =

Z - Inner lever arm of composite section = 1.592 m
hf - Thickness of Flange = 240 mm
 - Strength reduction factor = 0.52
fctd - = 1.87
Description L/2-3L/8 3L/8-L/4 L/4-L/8 L/8-Support
DFd 293.98 821.96 1401.79 1987.96
Dx 2.625 2.625 2.625 2.625
D Fd
0.47 1.30 2.23 3.16
h f .D x
cotf 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50

V EDf .h f
= 102.98 287.93 491.05 696.38
f yd . cot  f
Provide 4L- 10 Dia 4L- 10 Dia 4L- 12 Dia 4L- 12 Dia

Asf 1256.64 1256.64 2261.95 2261.95
Sf 250.00 250.00 200.00 200.00
8.07 OK 8.07 OK 8.07 OK 8.07 OK
0.4fctd 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
DESIGN OF END DIAPHRAGM
Design End Cross Girder:
The End Cross Girder is designed as deep beam for service condition spanning between longitudinal girders, The reinforcement
required for the same is calculated and also check for jacking condition for both bending & shear.
Design End Cross Girder for Service Condition:
Summary of Shear Force & Bending Moment in End Cross Girder
Condition Loadings Sagging Moment Hogging Moment Shear Force

DL 13 17 32
SIDL (W.C) 0 0 0
SIDL (C.B) 5 24 9
Pedestrian LL 0 0 0
70R+Class A
Maximum
51 71 126
Carriageway LL
Service
Summation (1.35 DL+1.75 SIDL+

100 154 178
1.15 FPLL + 1.5 LL) ULS
Summation (1.0 DL+1.0 SIDL+ 0.75
69 112 167
FPLL + 1.0 LL) SLS-Rare
Summation (1.0 DL+1.0 SIDL+ 0.0
18 41 41
FPLL + 0.0 LL) SLS-QPC
DL 384 391 498
SIDL (W.C) 37 37 46
Jack Up SIDL (C.B) 105 105 131
Conditio Summation (1.35 DL+1.75
725 734 930
n SIDL(W.C)+1.35SIDL(C.B)) ULS
Summation (1.0 DL+1.0 SIDL) SLS-
533 540 684
Rare & QPC
.
Design:
Ultimate Limit State :
Maximum Hogging Moment = 734 KNm
Maximum Sagging Moment = 725 KNm
Maximum Shear Force = 930 KN
Serviceability Limit State -Rare Combination:
Serviceability Limit State -Quasi Permanent Combination:
Width of Cross Girder = 0.40 m

Depth of Cross Girder = 1.700 m
C/c distance between longitudinal girder = 3.20 m
Bottom bulb width of longitudinal girder = 0.60 m
Grade of Concrete = 35 MPa
Grade of Steel = 500 Mpa
Stress in Concrete (Rare combination) = 16.80 Mpa
Stress in Concrete (QPC combination) = 12.60 Mpa
Modular ratio = 6.25
Stress in Steel (Rare & QPC combination) = 400.00 Mpa
Crack width (As per Table-12.1) = 0.30 mm
Clear cover to outer most reinforcement = 40 mm
Effective Span : As per clause 29.1 of IS:456-2000, the effective span will be smaller of the following
(i) c/c distance between support = 3.200 m

(ii) 1.15 times the clear span = 2.990 m
l = 2.990 m
D = 1.700 m 1.02
l/D = 1.759 < 2.50 (for continuous beam)
Hence as per Clause 29.1 of IS:456-2000, the End cross girder shall be designed as deep beam.
Lever Arm:
Lever Arm Z = 0.2 * (l + 1.5*D) = 1.108 m
CHECK FOR ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
For sagging moment (Positive Reinforcement):
Max sagging moment M = 724.90 KN.m
Provide 3 nos 25 f + 3 nos 20 f

Area of steel provided = 2415 mm2
Min. Reinforcement required Ast min = 761 mm2

OK
Max. Reinforcement required Ast max = 11080 mm2
OK
Depth of Neutral Axis Xu = 208.45 mm
Limiting Neutral Axis Xu lim = 505.35 mm

OK
Moment of Resistance (MOR) Mu lim = 1076.45 KN.m
OK
For hogging moment (Negative Reinforcement):
Max hogging moment M = 734.35 KN.m

Area of steel provided = 2415 mm2
Min. Reinforcement required Ast min = 761 mm2

OK
Max. Reinforcement required Ast max = 11080 mm2
OK
Depth of Neutral Axis Xu = 208.45 mm
Limiting Neutral Axis Xu lim = 505.35 mm

OK
Moment of Resistance (MOR) Mu lim = 1076.45 KN.m
OK
Distribution of Reinforcement
The distribution reinforcement over the support of a deep beam is placed in two zones
Zone I
It is the zone of depth "0.2 * D" , adjacent to the tension face,and contains a proportion of the tensile steel given by
0.5 * ( l / D - 0.5 ) = 0.63 m

2
Ast required in Zone I = 0.6295 * 2415 = 1521 mm
2
Area of steel provided = 2415 mm > 1521 OK
Reinforcement shall be placed at the top within a depth of (0.2 D) = 0.34 m
Zone II
It is the zone measuring "0.3 D" on either side of the mid depth of the beam, which shall contain the
remainder of the tension steel evenly distributed.
2
Ast required in Zone II = = 894 mm
Provide 3 nos 16 f + 2 nos 16 f on each face
2
Area of steel provided = 1005 mm > 894 OK
Reinforcement shall be placed in the middle of (0.3 D * 1) = 0.51 m
Lever Arm for calc crack width

Z = 1.7-0.025/2-0-0.04*2 = 1.6475
CHECK FOR SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE-RARE COMBINATION
Depth of Neutral Axis x = 208.45 mm
MOI of Cracked section Icr = 3.156E+10 mm4
Stress in concrete M*x/Icr = 3.52 Mpa

OK
Stress in Steel m*M*(d-x)/Icr = 152.01 Mpa
OK
Depth of Neutral Axis x = 208.45 mm
MOI of Cracked section Icr = 3.156E+10 mm4

OK
OK
CHECK FOR SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE-QUASI PERMANENT COMBINATION

OK
OK

OK
OK
CHECK FOR CRACK WIDTH
Equi.diameter фeq (n1ф12+n2ф22)/(n1ф1+n2ф2) = 22.78 mm
Spacing of Bonded Reinf. <=5*(C+ф/2) = 256.94 mm

in tension zone
rr.eff As/Ac.eff = 0.0460
Ac eff = 52500 mm2
Max. crack spacing Srmax 3.4c+0.17ф/ρp.eff = 220.18 mm
(esm-ecm) (ssc - kt fct.eff/rr.eff (1+aerr.eff))/Es >=0.6 ssc / Es = 0.00053
ssc = 152.01 Mpa
Crack width Wk Sr,max (esm-ecm) = 0.117 mm

OK
Equi.diameter фeq (n1ф12+n2ф22)/(n1ф1+n2ф2) = 22.78 mm
Spacing of Bonded Reinf. <=5*(C+ф/2) = 256.94 mm

in tension zone
rr.eff As/Ac.eff = 0.0460
Ac eff = 52500 mm2
Max. crack spacing Srmax 3.4c+0.17ф/ρp.eff = 220.18 mm
(esm-ecm) (ssc - kt fct.eff/rr.eff (1+aerr.eff))/Es = 0.00054
ssc = 154.00 Mpa
Crack width Wk Sr,max (esm-ecm) = 0.119 mm

OK
Side face Reinforcement: Cl.16.5.4 of IRC:112-2020
Min. Side face reinf. req 0.01 * 320 * 1220 = 1952 mm2
Provide 7 nos 16 f + 0 nos 12 f on each face
2
Area of steel provided = 2815 mm
OK
Shear Reinforcement for Service Condition:
Shear Force = VEd = 178.24 KN

Effective depth of girder = d = 1108 mm
Width of girder = b = 400 mm
Max Shear Force = Vmax = 64542.24 KN
OK
strength reduction factor = ν = 18.63
Longitudinal force = NEd = 0.00 KN
Comp. stress as CG due to Axial = σcp = 0.00 Mpa

load
ρ1 = 0.00545
Shear resistance of section = VRd.c = 186.25 KN
without shear reinf.
Minimum shear resistance = VRd.c = 138.25 KN
Shear resistance = VRd.c = 186.25 KN

186.25 > 178.24 Shear Reinf. not required
Net Design Shear force = VNS = 178.24 KN

load
αcw = 1.00
sin2θ = 0.062
Cotθ = 2.5
Provide 2 legged 12 f dia bars @ 200 c/c
Min shear reinf. ratio = ρmin = 0.00098

Provided shear reinf. ratio = ρmin provided = 0.00283 OK
Shear Force by shear reinf. = VRd.s = 1505.44 KN

Balance Shear = VNS - VRd.c -8.02 KN
-8.02 < 1505.44 OK
2
Max Shear reinforcement = Asw max = 862.59 mm
OK
Max Long. Spacing = = 600
OK
Shear Reinforcement for Jack-up Condition:
Shear Force = V = 929.65 KN

Effective depth of girder = d = 1108 mm
Width of girder = b = 400 mm
Max Shear Force = Vmax = 64542.24 KN
OK
strength reduction factor = ν = 18.63
Longitudinal force = NEd = 0.00 KN

load
ρ1 = 0.00545
Shear resistance of section = VRd.c = 186.25 KN
without shear reinf.
Minimum shear resistance = VRd.c = 138.25 KN
Shear resistance = VRd.c = 186.25 KN

186.25 < 929.65 Provide Shear Reinf.
Net Design Shear force = VNS = 929.65 KN

load
αcw = 1.00
sin2θ = 0.324
Cotθ = 2.5
Provide 2 legged 12 f dia bars @ 200 c/c
Min shear reinf. ratio = ρmin = 0.00098

Provided shear reinf. ratio = ρmin provided = 0.00283 OK
Shear Force by shear reinf. = VRd.s = 1505.44 KN

Balance Shear = VNS - VRd.c 743.40 KN
743.40 < 1505.44 OK
2
Max Shear reinforcement = Asw max = 862.59 mm
OK
Max Long. Spacing = = 600
OK
Provide 2L-12mm dia stirrups @ 200mm c/c .
Design of deck slab
SALIENT DATA FOR DESIGN
1 NO OF GIRDERS = 4
2 C/C OF GIRDER = 3200 mm
3 C/C DISTANCE BETWEEN PIERS = 22000 mm
4 OVERALL LENGTH OF DECK SLAB = 21960.00 mm (Minimum expansion gap is excluded)
5 THICKNESS OF DECK SLAB = 240 mm (UNIFORM FOR FULL LENGTH)
6 OVERALL WIDTH OF DECK SLAB = = 13250 mm (OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE
7 CANTILEVER PROJECTION = 1825 mm OF DECK SLAB)
OF DECK SLAB BEYOND CL OF OUTER GRIDER
8 EXPANSION GAP BETWEEN = 40.00 mm
TWO SPANS
9 WEARING COAT THIKNESS = 65 mm
10 GRADE OF CONCRETE = M 35
Design of the deck slab

Dead loads on cantilever projection of deck slab
Self Weight of Deck Slab = 0.24 x 25 = 6.00 kN/m
(thk) (density)
Wt. of RCC Railing = 0.00 kN/m
Footpath loading = 0.00 kN/m 2
Wt. of Wearing coat = 0.065 x 22 = 1.430 kN/m
(thk) (density)
Wt. of Crash Barrier = 0.325 x 25 = 8.13 kN/m
(area) (density)
= 8.13 kN/m
8.125 kN/m 1 0.00 kN/m
1.43 kN/m 6.000 kN/m
0.240
0.240
1.325 m
1.575 m
1.825 m 1
CASE 1 : - CLASS A FIRST WHEEL OCCUPIES THE POSITION AT MIDSPAN OF C/C OF GIRDER AND
OTHER WHEEL FOLLOWS FIRST
A= 57 kN B= 57 kN
1.80 m
1.600 m 1.600 m 0.20 m 3.00 m

B C D
Span BC (LOAD - A )
Distribution width in transverse direction
beff = alfa x a 1 - a + b1 IRC:112
l0 annexure B-3
c/c of Ribs = 3.200 m.

b = width of slab on which load acts = 13.25 m.
l0 = effective span = 3.20 m.
b = 13.250 = 4.14 > 2.0
l0 3.20
'alfa = 2.6 ( for continuous slab )
a = dist.of c.g of concentrated load from nearer support
= 1.600 m.
b1 = tyre dimension over contact area perpendicular to span
max Axle load = 114 kN
max wheel load = 57 kN
tyre diam. II to span = 500 - 50 = 450.00 mm
tyre dimension perpendicular to span = 250 mm
b1 = breadth of concentration area of the load

= 0.250 + 2 x 0.065
( Tyre dimn. ) ( wearing coat thickness )
= 0.38 m.
beff = 2.6 x 1.600 1 - 1.600 + 0.38
3.2
= 2.46 m.
c/c of axles in transverse direction = 1.20 m.
< 2.46 m.
combined width = 3.66 m
Distribution width in longitudinal direction
= width of wheel + 2 x thickness of deck slab inclusive of wearing coat
= 0.45 + 2 x 0.305
= 1.06 m.
Load per m 2 = 114 = 29.38

3.66 x 1.06 kN/m
Impact factor vide Fig. No. 5 of IRC 6 = 0.49

With Impact factor & for unit width in Longitudinal Direction
= 29.38 x 1.49 = 43.76 kN/m
43.76 kN/m
1.07 m 1.06 1.07
* Load B need not to be considered as it quite close to support producing either almost no or negligible stresses in slab.
CASE 2 : - CLASS A WHEELED VEHICLE OCCUPIES THE POSITION AT MIDSPAN

57.0 kN 57 kN
1.80 m
0.700 m 1.800 0.700 m

B C
beff = alpha x a 1 - a . + b1
l0
b = width of slab = 13.250 m.
b = 13.250 = 4.14 > 2.0
l0 3.2
alpha = 2.6 ( for continuous slab )
= 0.700 m.
tyre diam. II to span = 500 - 50 = 450 mm
tyre dimension perpendicular to span = 250 mm

= 0.250 + 2 x 0.065
= 0.38 m.
beff = 2.6 x 0.700 1 - 0.7 + 0.38
3.2
= 1.80 m.
< 1.80 m.
= 0.45 + 2 x 0.305
= 1.06 m.
Load per m 2 = 114 = 35.83 kN/m
3.00 x 1.06
With Impact factor & for unit width in Longitudinal Direction
= 35.83 x 1.49 = 53.35 kN/m
53.35 53.35
0.740
0.170 1.060 1.06 0.17
B C
CASE 3 : - CLASS A WHEELED FIRST LANE ECCENTRIC POSITION OTHER WHEEL FOLLOWS FIRST
A= 57 kN B= 57 kN
1.80 m
0.9 m 0.925 m 0.88 m 2.33 m

A B C
Span AB (LOAD - A )
beff = 1.2a . + b1

tyre diam. II to span = 500 - 50 = 450
tyre dimension perpendicular to span = 250.00 mm

= 0.250 + 2 x 0.065
n
( Tyre dim . ) ( wearing coat thickness )
= 0.38 m.

= 0.925 m.
beff = 1.2 x 0.925 + 0.38

= 1.49 m.
< 1.49 m.
= 0.45 + 2 x 0.305
= 1.06 m.
Load per m 2 = 114 = 39.98 kN/m

2.69 x 1.06
Impact factor vide Fig. No. 5 of IRC 6 -2014 = 0.5000
With Impact factor & for unit width in Longitudinal Dirtn.
= 39.98 x 1.50 = 59.97 kN/m
59.97 t/m
0.370 m 1.060 0.395 m

Span BC (LOAD - B )
A= 57 kN B= 57 kN
1.80 m
0.9 m 0.925 m 0.88 m 2.33 m

A B C
beff = alfa x a 1 - a . + b1
l0

b = width of slab on which load acts = 13.250 m.
b = 13.250 = 4.14 > 2.0
l0 3.2
alfaa = 2.6 ( for continuous slab )
= 0.875 m.
tyre diam. II to span = 500 - 50 = 450
tyre dimension perpendicular to span = 250.00 mm mm

= 0.250 + 2 x 0.065
= 0.38 m.
beff = 2.6 x 0.875 1 - 0.875 + 0.38
3.2
= 2.03 m.
< 2.03 m.
= 0.45 + 2 x 0.305
= 1.06 m.
Load per m 2 = 114 = 33.27 t/m

3.23 x 1.06
Impact factor vide Fig. No. 5 of IRC 6 -2014 = 0.49 IRC:6-2014, cl.211.2
With Impact factor & for unit width in Longitudinal Dirtn.

= 33.27 x 1.49 = 49.54 kN/m
49.54 kN/m
0.345 1.06 1.80 m

B C
59.97 kN/m 49.54 kN/m
0.370 m 1.060 m 0.395 m 0.35 m 1.060 m 1.80 m

CASE 4 : - CLASS 70-R FIRST BOGGIE OCCUPIES THE POSITION AT MIDSPAN OF C/C OF GIRDER AND
OTHER WHEEL FOLLOWS FIRST
100 kN 100 kN
1.93 m
1.600 m 1.600 m 0.33 m 2.87 m

B C D
l0
c/c distance = 3.20 m.
b = 13.25 = 4.14 > 2.0
l0 3.20
= 1.600 m.
2
max tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm IRC:6-2014 annexure A
max Axle load = 20 t
max wheel load = 10 t
2
tyre contact area = 10 x 1000 = 1896 cm
5.273
tyre diam. II to span = 860 - 50 = 810 mm
tyre dimension perpendicular to span = 26.30 cm

= 0.2630 + 2 x 0.065
= 0.39 m.
beff = 2.6 x 1.600 1 - 1.600 + 0.39
3.2
= 2.47 m.
< 2.47 m.
width of wheel +
2 x thickness of deck slab inclusive of wearing coat
= 0.81 + 2 x 0.305
= 1.42 m.
Load per m 2 = 200 = 38.14 kN/m
3.69 x 1.42
n
With Impact factor &for unit width in Longitudinal Direct .
= 38.14 x 1.25 = 47.67 kN/m IRC:6-2014, Cl.208.3
47.67 kN/m
0.890 1.420 0.890

B C
* Load B need not to be considered as it quite close to support producing either almost no or negligible stresses in slab.
CASE 5 : - 70R BOGGIE VEHICLE BOTH WHEELS PLACED SYMMETRICALLY @ CENTRAL SUPPORT
100 kN 100 kN
1.93 m
2.235 m 0.965 m 0.965 m 2.235 m

B C D
l0
b = 13.250 = 4.14 > 2
l0 3.2
= 0.965 m.
2
max tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm
2
5.273
tyre diam. II to span = 860 - 50 = 810 810 mm

= 0.2630 + 2 x 0.065
= 0.39 m.
beff = 2.6 x 0.965 1 - 0.965 + 0.39
3.2
= 2.15 m.
< 2.15 m.
Distribution width in longitudinal direction width of wheel +
2 x thickness of wearing coat
= 0.81 + 2 x 0.305
= 1.42 m.
Load per m 2 = 200 = 41.85 kN/m
3.37 x 1.42
n
With Impact factor &for unit width in Longitudinal Dirt .
= 41.85 x 1.25 = 52.31 kN/m
52.31 kN/m
1.525 1.420 0.255

B C
CASE 6 : - CLASS 70R BOGGIE VEHICLE OCCUPIES THE POSITION AT MIDSPAN
100 kN 100 kN
1.93 m
0.635 m 1.93 m 0.635 m 3.20 m

C D E
l0
b = 13.250 = 4.14 > 2
l0 3.2
= 0.635 m.
2
max tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm
2
5.273
tyre diam. II to span = 860 - 50 = 810 810 mm
= 0.2630 + 2 x 0.065
= 0.39 m.
beff = 2.6 x 0.635 1 - 0.635 + 0.39
3.2
= 1.716 m.
c/c of axles in longitudinal direction = 1.22 m.
< 1.72 m.
Distribution width in longitudinal direction width of wheel +
2 x (thickness of wearing coat+slab)
= 0.81 + 2 x 0.305
= 1.42 m.
Load per m 2 = 200 = 47.97 kN/m
2.94 x 1.42
With Impact factor &for unit width in Longitudinal Dirtn.
= 47.97 x 1.25 = 59.96 kN/m
59.96 kN/m 59.96 kN/m
-0.075 1.42 0.510 1.42 -0.075

C D
CASE 7 : - CLASS 70R TRACKED VEHICLE OCCUPIES THE POSITION AT MIDSPAN

350 kN 350 kN
2.06 m
0.570 m 2.06 m 0.570 m 3.20 m

C D E
width of track = 840 - 50 = 790.00 mm
width over track = 2900 mm
length of vehicle = 4570 mm
l0
b = 13.250 = 4.14 > 2
l0 3.2
= 0.570 m.
= width of track + 2 x thickness of wearing coat
= 4570 + 2 x 65
= 4700 mm = 4.7 m
beff = 2.6 x 0.570 1 - 0.57 + 4.70
3.2
= 5.92 m.
= width of track + 2 x (thickness of wearing coat+slab)
= 790 + 610 = 1.400 m
Load per m 2 = 350 = 42.24 kN/m
5.92 x 1.4
With Impact factor &for unit width in Longitudinal Dirtn.
= 42.24 x 1.25 = 52.80 kN/m
52.80 kN/m 52.80 kN/m
-0.13 1.4 0.660 1.4 -0.130

C D
Design of Deck Slab
Structural Strength - Ultimate
Concrete characteristic strength, Fck 35 N/mm2
Steel characteristic strength, Fst 500 N/mm2
Section Thickness Cover Bar dia

hogging steel 240 40 16
sagging steel 240 40 16
Max
Section moment K
(KNM)
hogging steel 99.98 0.077 OK K= M/(fck x b x d2) MR = 0.87 x fst x Ast pro* (d - ((0.87xfstxAst pro)/(0.892xfckxb)))
sagging steel 55 0.043 OK Z= d x (0.5 + sqrt(0.25-(K/.894)) λ - factor defining effective height of compression zone
Ast req = M/(0.87 x fst x Z) η - effective strength 1 for fck<60Mpa
s in mm = (0.87 x fst x Ast req)/ (0.446 x fck x b)
Design for bending moment x in mm = s/λ as per Eq A2-33 of IRC 112 where λ = 0.8
Bar
Moment Asreq MR (KN- spacing Aspro
Section for ULS b (mm) d (mm) K z (mm) 2 s (mm) x (mm) dia Bar dia spacing Bar dia spacing 2
(KN-M) (mm ) M) (mm) (mm )
(mm)
hogging steel 99.98 1000 192 0.077 173.59 1324.01 36.81 46.0 101 16 151.86 16 150 0 150 1340.4
sagging steel 55 1000 192 0.043 182.36 693.33 19.28 24.1 60 12 163.12 12 150 0 150 754.0
Design for shear force
IRC 112 Shear capacity of concrete with out reinforcement
10.3.2 Minimum of VRD.C = (0.12K*(80r1*fck)1/3+scp)bwd
and VRD.C = (nmin + 0.15scp)bd
1.5 .5*
nmin = 0.031K *(fck) bd
scp 0
K 1+sqt*(200/d) 2.00
r1 0.007
VRD.C = kN 124.13
VRD.C min = kN 99.60
Design VRD.C = kN 124.13
Actual Shear force at deff from support & girder face 107
Check No SR
IRC 112 Distribution reinforcement (20% of main reinforcement) Slab

clause 16.6.1.1 top bottom
16.6.1.1 Ast required - mm2 268 151
diameter of bar 10 10
spacing 200 200
Ast provided - mm2 393 393
Serviceability Limit state
Cracking (Quasi-Permanent combination)
IRC 112 Wr = Sr,max(esm-ecm)
12.3 Sr,max = 3.4c+0.425k1*k2*f/rpeff
fctm - value from table 6.5 page 38 2.8
k1 0.8 deformed bars,
1.6 plain bars
k2 0.5 bending
1 pure tension
kt 0.5
ae = Es/Ecm considering long term effect * governing load case and member number for BM is mentioned in next page
rpeff = Wr
M (KnM) c (mm) f (mm) Sr,max (mm) ssc (N/mm2) esm-ecm 0.6*ssc/Es esm-ecm Check
As/Acef (mm)
Section
hogg 24.0 40 16 0.024 247.53 107.24 0.0001 0.0003 0.0003 0.080 Okay
sagg 7.0 40 12 0.013 298.44 53.97 -0.0004 0.0002 0.0002 0.048 Okay
Check for Serviceability Limit State (SLS)
Check for stress limitation

Description Units hogg sagg
Max moment - Rare kNm 58 37
Max moment - Quasi kNm 24 7
Permissible stress limitation - Rare combination
Compressive stress in concrete
Mpa 16.8 16.8
(0.48fck) σc
Tensile stress in reinforcement
Mpa 300 300
(0.6fyk) σst
Permissible stress limitation - Quasi permanent combination
Compressive stress in concrete
Mpa 12.6 12.6
(0.36fck) σc
Tensile stress in reinforcement
Mpa 300 300
(0.6fyk) σst
Calculation of stress in concrete and reinforcement
c/s area Ac mm2 240000 240000
Perimeter u mm 2480 2480
ho = 2Ac/u mm 194 194
age of loading to days 28 28
creep coefficient 1.88 1.88
creep coefficient at 28 days (table 6.9 of IRC 112/amendment no.2/august 2014) for RH = 80%
Eceff (long term) Mpa 11109 11109
Ecm (short term) Mpa 32000 32000
modular ratio m
18.00 18.00
(long term)
modular ratio m
6.25 6.25
(short term)
Ast provided mm2 1340.41 753.98
stress calculation - long term effect:

Rare combination
Depth of neutral axis mm 75 60
4
Ic mm 4.71E+08 3.09E+08
σc - Rare combination Mpa 9.25 7.18
σst - Rare combination Mpa 259.16 285.25
Check for stress limitation σc ok ok
σst ok ok
Quasi Permanent combination
σc - Quasi combination Mpa 3.83 1.36
σst - Quasi combination Mpa 107.24 53.97
σst ok ok
stress calculation - short term effect:
Rare combination
Depth of neutral axis mm 49 38
Ic mm4 2.11E+08 1.30E+08
σc - Rare combination Mpa 13.49 10.84
σst - Rare combination Mpa 246.30 273.68
σst ok ok
Quasi Permanent combination
σc - Quasi combination Mpa 5.58 2.05
σst - Quasi combination Mpa 101.92 51.78
σst ok ok
Design of Projecting Deck Slab at Expansion joint
Data Given
Thickness of Deck slab at edge = 0.350 m
Length of cantilever slab beyond diaphragm = 0.280 m
Thickness of W.C. = 0.065 m
Calculation of dead Load & SIDL Moment at the Face of Cantilever
Dis. of cg. Moment @
Sl. no. Item Length Depth Unit Wt. Wt. per m from the face the cant. face
Load Factors (m) (m) (kN/m^3) (kN/m) (m) (kN-m/m)
1 Cantilever Slab seg.(1) 1.35 0.280 0.350 25.000 2.450 0.140 0.463
2 Wt. of the Wearing Course 1.75 0.280 x 2.500 0.700 0.140 0.172
( Wt. of W.C. = 2.50 kN/m^2 )
Total 3.150 0.635
Moment in Cantilever Slab due to CWLL Class-70R Bogie Axle placed symmetrically(M Type)
Considering 200.00 kN Axle passing through the section
Dis. of Nearest Axle for Cl.70R Bogie Axle = 1.220 m
Width of tyre of 70R Bogie Axle (M-Type) = 0.410 - 0.050 = 0.360 m
Calculation of Contact Length along Longitudinal direction of span For 70R Bogie Axle
Maximum Tyre Pressure = 5.273 Kg/m^2
Contact length of tyre for 50.000 kN Load = 50.000 x 10 = 0.263 mm

(for 70R "M-Type") 360 x 5.273
200 kN
0.280 m
Elevation
Root of cantilever Slab

Plan
Effective width of the Slab be = 1.2 a + b1
b1 = 0.360 + 2 x 0.065 = 0.490 m

Th. of W.C.
a = 0.148 m
be = 1.200 x 0.148 + 0.490 = 0.668 m
= 0.668 m
Impact Factor for Cl. 70R Wheeled Loading = 1.250

(for cantilever slab portion having length < 9m)
Considering no dispersion of Load along the Span
Intensity of the Load Live Load = 100.000 = 149.709 kN/m

0.668
Live load Factor = 1.500 -Refer Table 3.2 of IRC:6-2017
B.M. at the root of Cantilever = 1.250 x 149.709 x 0.280 x 1.500

due to Live Load
= 78.597 kN-m/m
S.F. at the root of Cantilever = 1.250 x 149.709 x 1.500

due to Live Load
= 280.705 kN per m
Total Ultimate B.M. at the root of Cantilever = 0.635 + 78.597 = 79.232 kN-m/m
Material Properties:
Grade of Concrete = M 35
fck = 35 N/mm2
fctm = 2.77 N/mm2

Grade of Steel = Fe 500 ( HYSD Bars)
fy or fyk = 500.00 N/mm2
fyd = 435 N/mm2 (fy/1.15)
Es = 200000 N/mm2
Clear cover to reinforcement = 40 mm

Maximum Dia of Bar along long. = 16 mm
Maximum Dia of Bar along cant. = 12 mm
Unit width of slab = 1000 mm
Design Moment of Resistance MRD = 0.87fyAst * (d-(lxu/2)) hfcd
l.xu
xu
79.23 = 0.87fyAst * (d-(lxu/2))
Area of steel required Ast = 881.27 mm2
Moment resisting capacity corresponding to steel provided = 133.95 KN-m

OK 0.87fy
b f .h f cd .  x  0 . 87 . f y . A st
h = 1
2
fcd = 15.63 N/mm
Check For Depth
MED = Mu,lim
xu ,max xu ,max
7.92E+07 = h. f cd . .(1  0.4. ).b f .d 2
d d
d provided = 288 mm
Provide 12 dia @ spacing 200 + 12 dia @ spacing 200 = 1130.97 mm2/m

Reference Calculations for 22m span with 0 degree skew - normal case
Input Data:
Code used:IRC 83-2015(Part-II)
Note:Typical Sizes of Laminated Bearings are available in Appendix-2 of IRC 83-2015(Part-II)
Overall width of bearing (shorter dimension) - a = 300 mm
Overall length of bearing (longer dimension) - b = 500 mm 2018
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of top cover = 4 mm (Minimum of 2.5mm) Cl.5.1.2
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of bottom cover = 4 mm (Minimum of 2.5mm) Cl.5.1.2
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of side cover = 8 mm (Minimum of 4mm) Cl.5.1.2
Appendix2 Thickness of individual Elastomer(ti) = 12 mm Appendix2
Thickness of total elastomer(Te) = 36 mm
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of reinforcing Plates = 4 mm (Minimum of 3mm) Cl.5.1.2
No.of layers of elastomer(n) 3 Nos
No.of reinforcing Plates = 4 Nos
Effective width of bearing (a') = 284 mm
Effective length of bearing (b') = 484 mm
C/C distance of bearings in transverse dir. = 3200 mm
C/C distance of bearings in traffic dir. = 21000 mm
No.of Bearings = 8 Nos
Angular rotation of a bearing (𝛼) = 0.0018 rad
Table 2 Shear modulus (G), corresponding to hardness 60+-5 = 0.9 Mpa Table 2
Cl.5.2.3.7 Bulk modulus of Elastomeric bearing(Eb) = 2000 Mpa
Elastic modulus of concrete(Ecm) = 32000 Mpa
Grade of Concrete of Superstructure(fck) = 35 Mpa
Cross Section area of Superstructure(Ac) = 1860000 mm2
Perimeter of Cross Section area of Superstructure(u) = 7740 mm
IRC 112 Autogenous Shrinkage strain of Concrete (𝜀𝑐𝑎) = 0.000045
Cl.6.4.2.6 Drying Shrinkage Strain (𝜀𝑐𝑑 ) = 0.000276
o
IRC 6 - Maximum temparature of Bridge = 42 C
2017 Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete = 0.000012 /oC
Yield stress of the steel(fy) = 500 Mpa
Cl.5.2.3 Partial Safety factor(γm) = 1 Cl.5.1.3
Cl.5.2.3 Type loading factor(KL) = 1 Cl.5.1.3
Cl.5.2.3.5 Factor for induced tensile stresses in reinforcing plate(Kh) = 1 Cl.5.1.3.5
Cl.5.2.3.5 Stress concentration factor (Kp) = 1.3 Cl.5.1.3.5
Cl.5.2.3.6 Friction factor(Kf) = 0.6 Cl.5.1.3.6
Cl.5.2.3.6 Rotation factor, (Krd) = 3.0 Cl.5.1.3.6
Typical Diagram
8
4
60 12
Elevation
300
500
Plan
Summary of Loads on Bearings
Vertical Load
Bearing No. 37 47 48 58 59 69 70 80
Units (T) (T) (T) (T) (T) (T) (T) (T)
Due to Suprstr. Dead Load 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
SIDL wearing coat 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
SIDL CB & Railing 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 -4.00 -4.00 -4.00 -4.00
Due to FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL (Max. Reaction on bearing) 49.45 46.00 46.00 49.45 75.00 77.00 62.00 63.00
Refer Reaction
LL (Min. Summary
Reaction on bearing with -3.00 -3.00 -2.00 -1.00 -2.33 -2.33 -3.50 -3.50
Max. Horizontalon
Max.Reaction Force) Refer
Bearing 115.45 112.00 112.00 115.45 126.00 128.00 113.00 114.00
Min.Reaction on bearing 63.00 63.00 64.00 65.00 48.67 48.67 47.50 47.50
Min.Reaction on bearing 66.00 66.00 66.00 66.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00
Note: Above LL values are including the Impact Factor.
Maximum Vertical design force(Fz,d) = 1280.00 kN
Minimum Vertical design force(Fz,d min) = 475.00 kN
Minimum Vertical design force(Fz,d min)-only permenant loads 510 kN
Average of the compressive stress(σm) = (475x1000)/(116185.254798872)
4.09 Mpa
Horizontal Force(Longitudinal)
Long. Force due to braking per bearing = 0.200 x 1000.0 + 0.050 x 554.0
(Max. Reaction Case) 8
= 28.46 kN
Resultant of all Horizontal forces(Fxyd) = 28.46 kN
Calculation of rotation
Due to Dead Load SIDL FPLL LL Total

Longitudinal Direction kNm kNm kNm kNm
Max.Longitudinal Moment 2106.00 435.00 0.00 3320.00
Moment of Inertia I mm4 8.54E+11 8.54E+11 8.54E+11 8.54E+11
Rotation across the width 'a' 0.00065 0.00013 0.00000 0.00102 0.0018
Angle of rotation across the width 'a' (𝛼 ) = 0.0018 rad
a,d
IRC 112 Calculation of Total Shrinkage Strain (𝜀𝑐𝑠 ) Table 6.7 of IRC 112
Cl.6.4.2.6 𝜀𝑐𝑠 = 𝜀𝑐𝑑 ∞ 𝜀𝑐𝑎 , +
ho in mm Kh
𝜀𝑐𝑑 , ∞=Kh.𝜀𝑐𝑑 300 0.75
Kh= 2AC/u 500 0.70
481 0.70
Coefficient depending on the notional size ho(Kh) = 0.70
Total shrinkage strain (𝜀𝑐𝑠) = (0.70484496124031x0.000276)+0.000045
= 2.40E-04
Calculation of total temparature coefficient
Total temparature coefficient = (0.000012x42)

= 0.000504 Table 6.9 of IRC 112
Calculation of Creep strain 2Ac/u ɸ
Creep coefficient of concrete = 1.08 150 1.15
Creep strain of concrete = 1.08x(35/32000) 600 1.05
= 1.18E-03 481 1.08
Calculation of translation of superstructure due to temp. ,shrinkage and creep
Longitudinal Direction
Due to temparature = (0.000504x(21000))
= 10.58 mm
Due to Shrinkage = (0.000239537209302326x(21000))
= 5.03 mm
Due to Creep = (0.0012x(21000))
= 24.73 mm
Max.Horiz. Relative displacement(In direction of a)-vx,d = (10.58 + 5.03 + 24.73)
= 40.3 mm
Transverse Direction
Due to temparature = (0.000504x(3200)
= 1.61 mm
= 0.77 mm
Due to Creep (0.0012x(3200))
= 3.77 mm
Max.Horiz. Relative displacement(In direction of b)-vy,d = (1.61 + 0.77 + 3.77)
= 6.15 mm
Cl.5.2.3 Maximum design strain (𝜀𝑡, 𝑑 )
𝜀𝑡 , 𝑑 =K𝐿(𝜀𝑐 , 𝑑 + 𝜀𝑞, 𝑑 + 𝜀𝛼 , 𝑑)
𝜀𝑢 , 𝑑 = 𝜀𝑢 , 𝑘 /𝛾𝑚
= 1x(2.46 + 0.93 + 0.13)
= 3.52 < 5 OK
( )
Cl.5.2.3.2 Design strain due to compressive design load (𝜀𝑐, 𝑑 )
𝜀𝑐 , 𝑑 =1.5 Fz,d/G.Ar.S
Ar=A1(1-vx,d/a'-vy,d/b')
S=A1/lp.te
Shape factor(S) = (284x484)/((2x(284 + 484)x12)
= 7.46
te = 12.00
Reduced effective plan area(Ar) = (284x484)x(1-(40.34/284)-(6.15/484))

= 116185.25 mm2
Design strain due to compressive design load (𝜀𝑐, 𝑑) = (1.5x1280x1000)/(0.9x116185.25x7.46)
= 2.462
Cl.5.2.3.3 Design shear strain due to design translatory movements (𝜀𝑞 𝑑)
𝜀𝑞 , 𝑑 =vxy,d/Tq
Design Shear strain (𝜀𝑞, 𝑑) = MIN((SQRT(40.34^2+6.15^2)/(36+4+4)),1)
= 0.927
Cl.5.2.3.4 Design strain due to angular rotation (𝜀𝛼, 𝑑 )
𝜀α, d=(a'2.𝛼a,d+b'2.𝛼b,d)ti/2Σ(𝑡𝑖3)
Design strain due to angular rotation (𝜀𝛼, 𝑑) = (((284^2x0.0018+484^2x0))x12)/

(2x((4)x12^3))
= 0.126
Cl.5.2.3.5 Reinforcing plate thickness(ts)
ts=Kp.Fz,d.(t1+t2).Kh.𝛾𝑚/Ar.fy
Minimum thickness of steel plate required = MAX(((1.3x1280x1000x(12+12)x1x1)/
(116185.25x500)),3)
= 3.00 mm
Thickness of steel plate provided = 4 mm > 3.00 OK
Cl.5.2.3.6 Limiting conditions
Total Vertical deflection
Σ𝑉z,d=Σ(Fzd.𝑡𝑖/A1).(1/5.G.S12+1/Eb)
Vertical deflection of Individual layer = ((1280x1000x12)/(284x484))x
((1/(5x0.9x7.46^2))+1/2000))
= 0.502 mm
Total Vertical deflection = 1.507 mm
Rotational limitation Condition
For rectangular bearing
Σ𝑉z,d-(a'.𝛼a,d+b'. 𝛼𝑏, 𝑑 )/Kr,d≥ 0
Rotational limitation Condition = (1.51-(284x0.0018+484x0))/3
= 0.332 > 0 OK
Cl.5.2.3.6 Buckling stability(ULS)
Fz,d/Ar.<2.a'.G.S1/3.Te
Buckling stability(ULS) Fz,d/Ar = (1280x1000x1.0)/116185.25

= 11.02
2.a'.G.S1/3.Te = (2x284x0.9x7.46)/(3x36)
35.30
= 11.02 < 35.30 OK
Non Sliding condition(ULS)
Fxyd≤ μe.FZ,d min
μe=0.1+1.5Kf/𝜎𝑚
Fxyd = 28.46
= 28.46 kN
μe.FZ,d min = (0.1+1.5x0.6/4.09)x475

= 152.0667 kN
Non Sliding condition(ULS) = 28.4625 < 152.07 OK

Under Permanent loads
𝜎𝑐𝑑 𝑚𝑖𝑛=Fz,d min/Ar ≥ 3𝑀𝑃𝑎
Fz,d min/Ar = 510x1000x1.0/116185.25

= 4.39 N/sqmm
= 4.39 > 3 OK
Seismic coeffecient calculations
Z = Zone Factor from IRC:6 = 0.10 (zone 2)
R = Response Reduction factor from IRC:6 = 1.00 (for Bearing)
I = A coeff. depending upon the importance of the bridge = 1.20
Sa/g = Avg. response acceleration coefficient from IRC:6 = 2.50
Horizontal seismic coefficient Ah = 0.150
Vertical seismic coefficient Av = 0.100 (67% of Ah )
Computation of Loads in Seismic Case (In longitudnal Direction)
Ver. Seismic Coe. Total DL + SIDL

Vertical seismic force per bearing = 0.100 x ( 468.000 )
8
= 5.850 T
Hor. Seismic Coef. Total DL Total SIDL

Long. seismic force per brg . = 0.150 x ( 392.000 + 76.00 )
8 Nos. of bearings
= 8.775 T
Summary of Total Loads (Seismic Case)(In Long. Direction)

Max. Design vertical Load per bearing = 77.65 T
Min. Design vertical Load per bearing = 48.78 T
Max Longitudinal Horizontal Force acting on each bearing(Max Reacn.) = 14.47 T
Min Longitudinal Horizontal Force acting on each bearing = 8.78 T
Max Transverse Horizontal Force acting on each bearing = 2.81 T
Min Transverse Horizontal Force acting on each bearing = 2.63 T
Computation of Loads in Seismic Case (In transverse Direction)

Horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.15
Hor. Seismic Coe. Total DL + SIDL Total LL
Transverse seismic force per bearing = 0.15 x ( 468.000 + 31.08 )
8
= 9.358 T
Summary of Total Loads (Seismic Case) (Trans. Direction)

Min. Design vertical Load per bearing = 48.66 T
Longitudinal Horizontal Force (Max Vert.) = 5.69 T
Longitudinal Horizontal Force (Min Vert.) = 5.69 T
Max Transverse Seismic Force on each Bearing = 9.36 T
Min Transverse Seismic Force on each Bearing = 8.78 T
Max Longitudinal Seismic Force on each Bearing = 2.63 T
Min Longitudinal Seismic Force on each Bearing = 2.63 T
Computation of Loads in Seismic Case (In Vertical Direction)
Ver. Seismic Coe. Total DL + SIDL Total LL

Vertical seismic force per bearing = 0.1 x ( 468.000 + 31.08 )
8
= 6.239 T
Summary of Total Loads (Seismic Case) (Vert. Direction)

Min. Design vertical Load per bearing (With LL) = 44.29 T
Min. Design vertical Load per bearing (No LL) = 59.76 T
Reference Calculations for 22.0m span with 0 degree skew - seismic case
Input Data:
Code used:IRC 83-2015(Part-II)
Overall width of bearing (shorter dimension)-a = 300 mm
Overall length of bearing (longer dimension)-b = 500 mm
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of top cover = 4 mm (Minimum of 2.5mm)
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of bottom cover = 4 mm (Minimum of 2.5mm)
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of side cover = 8 mm (Minimum of 4mm)
Appendix2 Thickness of individual Elastomer(ti) = 12 mm
Thickness of total elastomer(Te) = 36 mm
Cl.5.2.2 Thickness of reinforcing Plates = 4 mm (Minimum of 3mm)
No.of layers of elastomer(n) 3 Nos
No.of reinforcing Plates = 4 Nos
Effective width of bearing (a') = 284 mm
Effective length of bearing (b') = 484 mm
C/C distance of bearings in transverse dir. = 3200 mm
C/C distance of bearings in traffic dir. = 21000 mm
No.of Bearings = 8 Nos
Angular rotation of a bearing (𝛼) = 0.0018 rad
Table 2 Shear modulus (G), corresponding to hardness 60+-5 = 0.9 Mpa
Cl.5.2.3.7 Bulk modulus of Elastomeric bearing(Eb) = 2000 Mpa
Elastic modulus of concrete(Ecm) = 32000 Mpa
Grade of Concrete of Superstructure(fck) = 35 Mpa
Cross Section area of Superstructure(Ac) = 1860000 mm2
Perimeter of Cross Section area of Superstructure(u) = 7740 mm
IRC 112 Autogenous Shrinkage strain of Concrete (𝜀𝑐𝑎) = 0.000045
Cl.6.4.2.6 Drying Shrinkage Strain (𝜀𝑐𝑑 ) = 0.000276
o
IRC 6 - Maximum temparature of Bridge = 42 C
2014 Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete = 0.000012 /oC
Yield stress of the steel(fy) = 500 Mpa
Cl.5.2.3 Partial Safety factor(γm) = 1
Cl.5.2.3 Type loading factor(KL) = 1
Cl.5.2.3.5 Factor for induced tensile stresses in reinforcing plate(Kh) = 1
Cl.5.2.3.5 Stress concentration factor (Kp) = 1.3
Cl.5.2.3.6 Friction factor(Kf) = 0.6
Cl.5.2.3.6 Rotation factor, (Krd) = 3
Typical Diagram
8
4
60 12
Elevation
300
500
Plan
Maximum Vertical design force(Fz,d) = 806 kN
Minimum Vertical design force(Fz,d min) = 479 kN
Minimum Vertical design force(Fz,d min)-only permenant loads 510 kN
Average of the compressive stress(σm) = (478.51545x1000)/(116185.254798872)
4.12 Mpa
seismic case
Resultant of all Horizontal forces(Fxyd) = 144.57 kN
Calculation of rotation
Due to Dead Load SIDL FPLL LL Total

Longitudinal Direction kNm kNm kNm kNm
Max.Longitudinal Moment 2106.00 435.00 0.00 3320.00
Moment of Inertia I mm4 8.54E+11 8.54E+11 8.54E+11 8.54E+11
Rotation across the width 'a' 0.00065 0.00013 0.00000 0.00102 0.0018
Angle of rotation across the width 'a' (𝛼 ) = 0.0018 rad
a,d
( )
IRC 112 Calculation of Total Shrinkage Strain (𝜀𝑐𝑠 ) Table 6.7 of IRC 112
Cl.6.4.2.6 𝜀𝑐𝑠 = 𝜀𝑐𝑑 ∞ 𝜀𝑐𝑎 , +
ho in mm Kh
𝜀𝑐𝑑 , ∞=Kh.𝜀𝑐𝑑 300 0.75
Kh= 2AC/u 500 0.70
481 0.70
Coefficient depending on the notional size ho(Kh) = 0.70
Total shrinkage strain (𝜀𝑐𝑠) = (0.70484496124031x0.000276)+0.000045
= 2.40E-04
Calculation of total temparature coefficient
Total temparature coefficient = (0.000012x42)

= 0.000504 Table 6.9 of IRC 112
Calculation of Creep strain 2Ac/u ɸ
Creep coefficient of concrete = 1.08 150 1.15
Creep strain of concrete = 1.08x(35/32000) 600 1.05
= 1.18E-03 481 1.08
Calculation of translation of superstructure due to temp. ,shrinkage and creep
Longitudinal Direction
Due to temparature = (0.000504x(21000))
= 10.58 mm
= 5.03 mm
Due to Creep = (0.0012x(21000))
= 24.73 mm
Max.Horiz. Relative displacement(In direction of a)-vx,d = (10.58 + 5.03 + 24.73)
= 40.3 mm
Transverse Direction
Due to temparature = (0.000504x(3200)
= 1.61 mm
= 0.77 mm
Due to Creep (0.0012x(3200))
= 3.77 mm
Max.Horiz. Relative displacement(In direction of b)-vy,d = (1.61 + 0.77 + 3.77)
= 6.15 mm
Cl.5.2.3 Maximum design strain (𝜀𝑡, 𝑑 )
𝜀𝑡 , 𝑑 =K𝐿(𝜀𝑐 , 𝑑 + 𝜀𝑞, 𝑑 + 𝜀𝛼 , 𝑑)
𝜀𝑢 , 𝑑 = 𝜀𝑢 , 𝑘 /𝛾𝑚
= 1x(1.55 + 0.93 + 0.13)
= 2.60 < 5 OK
( )
Cl.5.2.3.2 Design strain due to compressive design load (𝜀𝑐, 𝑑 )
𝜀𝑐 , 𝑑 =1.5 Fz,d/G.Ar.S
Ar=A1(1-vx,d/a'-vy,d/b')
S=A1/lp.te
Shape factor(S) = (284x484)/((2x(284 + 484)x12)
= 7.46
te = 12.00
Reduced effective plan area(Ar) = (284x484)x(1-(40.34/284)-(6.15/484))

= 116185.25 mm2
Design strain due to compressive design load (𝜀𝑐, 𝑑) = (1.5x805.680585x1000)/(0.9x116185.25x7.46)
= 1.550
Cl.5.2.3.3 Design shear strain due to design translatory movements (𝜀𝑞 𝑑)
𝜀𝑞 , 𝑑 =vxy,d/Tq
Design Shear strain (𝜀𝑞, 𝑑) = MIN((SQRT(40.34^2+6.15^2)/(36+4+4)),1)
= 0.927
Cl.5.2.3.4 Design strain due to angular rotation (𝜀𝛼, 𝑑 )
𝜀α, d=(a'2.𝛼a,d+b'2.𝛼b,d)ti/2Σ(𝑡𝑖3)
Design strain due to angular rotation (𝜀𝛼, 𝑑) = (((284^2x0.0018+484^2x0))x12)/

(2x((4)x12^3))
= 0.126
Cl.5.2.3.5 Reinforcing plate thickness(ts)
ts=Kp.Fz,d.(t1+t2).Kh.𝛾𝑚/Ar.fy
Minimum thickness of steel plate required = MAX(((1.3x805.680585x1000x(12+12)x1x1)/
(116185.25x500)),3)
= 3.00 mm
Thickness of steel plate provided = 4 mm > 3.00 OK
Cl.5.2.3.6 Limiting conditions
Total Vertical deflection
Σ𝑉z,d=Σ(Fzd.𝑡𝑖/A1).(1/5.G.S12+1/Eb)
Vertical deflection of Individual layer = ((805.680585x1000x12)/(284x484))x
((1/(5x0.9x7.46^2))+1/2000))
= 0.316 mm
Total Vertical deflection = 0.949 mm
Rotational limitation Condition
Σ𝑉z,d-(a'.𝛼a,d+b'. 𝛼𝑏, 𝑑 )/Kr,d≥ 0
Rotational limitation Condition = (0.95-(284x0.0018+484x0))/3
= 0.146 > 0 OK
Cl.5.2.3.6 Buckling stability(ULS)
Fz,d/Ar.<2.a'.G.S1/3.Te
Buckling stability(ULS) Fz,d/Ar = (805.68x1000x1.0)/116185.25

= 6.93
2.a'.G.S1/3.Te = (2x284x0.9x7.46)/(3x36)
35.30
= 6.93 < 35.30 OK
Non Sliding condition(ULS)
Fxyd≤ μe.FZ,d min
μe=0.1+1.5Kf/𝜎𝑚
Fxyd = 144.57
= 144.57 kN
μe.FZ,d min = (0.1+1.5x0.6/4.12)x478.52

= 152.4183 kN
Non Sliding condition(ULS) = 144.57 < 152.42 OK

Under Permanent loads
𝜎𝑐𝑑 𝑚𝑖𝑛=Fz,d min/Ar ≥ 3𝑀𝑃𝑎
Fz,d min/Ar = 510x1000x1.0/116185.25

= 4.39 N/sqmm
= 4.39 > 3 OK
Lifting Hook
This spreadsheet Pertains to the Design of Lifting hooks of the Precast Girders
450.00
applying sine rule
135
90
225 R1 225
225 45 45 225
202/sin(90) = R1/sin(135)
R1 = 318.198052
R1sin(45) = 225 kN
R1cos(45) = 225 kN
Inclination of strands with center of beam 45 deg.

Force at lifting hook [Vertical hanging force] Fv = 450.00 KN
No. of strands = 2 nos

Strand Type = 13
Effective Dia. Of strand = 12.700 mm
U.T.S = 1860.0 MPa
2
Total Area of single strand = 98.7 mm
2
Total Area of tendon = 197.4 mm
Ultimate tensile strength of tendon = 367.16 kN
Maximum permissible force in Tendon = 0.700 U.T.S
= 257.01 kN
Force on each embeded strand in a loop = 225.00 kN OK

534 Vup DC 01

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

534 Vup DC 01

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

534 Vup DC 01

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

20-02-2024 R0 INITIAL SUBMISSION

DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION Designed Checked Approved

M/s. SINDHU MURUGAN

CLIENT : SAFETY CONSULTANTS

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY VASUPRADA CONSULTANTS

S.No Item Description

1 Introduction, Input Data, Salient Features of Superstructure and Design Methodology

2 Grillage Model Representation

DESIGN FOR OUTER AND INNER GIRDER

3 Sectional Properties of Main Girder, Cross Girders

4 Calculation of Moments and Shears

5 Summary of Moments and Shear Forces

7 Differential Shrinkage Calculation

9 Design of Longitudinal Girder - Ultimate Design

11 Crack Width Calculation of Longitudinal Girder

12 Design of Longitudinal Girder - Flexural Shear & Interface Shear

DESIGN FOR END DIAPHRAGM

13 Design of End Diaphragm

DESIGN FOR RCC DECK SLAB

14 Design of Deck Slab

15 Elastomeric Bearing Design

Elastic Moduli of Material

Coefficient of Friction m 0.05 As per Clause 706.3.4, IRC: 78-2014

Density of RCC 25 KN/m3 IRC: 6-2017

SUPERSTRUCTURE & SPAN DETAILS

* footpath live load

Unit Weight of Materials

LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF THE DECK FOR SIDL & CWLL

Diaphragms have been designed for DL+SIDL load in Jack up condition.

ANALYSIS OF DECK SLAB

Hence Beff = 3.200 m

0.600 Section Through Diaphragm

Plan showing web widening of Girder

4.2 SECTIONS CONSIDERED IN DESIGN

0.000 L = 21.000 m ( Dist. Between temporary bearing )

SEC. DISTANCE FROM PERMANENT BEARING

1--1 0.5L 0.5 X 21.00 = 10.50 m

2--2 3/8 L 0.375 X 21 = 7.88 m

3--3 1/4 L 0.25 X 21 = 5.25 m

4--4 1/8 L 0.13 X 21 = 2.63 m

5--5 deff = 1.769 m

NH-15 RCC-G /Type-2 / 2 Long. Section of Girder

Deck Slab Thickness ( m ) = H3 = 0.240

CALCULATION OF TORSIONAL INERTIA

Slab Memb Modified Modified Modified

Length of the girder = 21.800 m

Distance Between Support, L = 21.000 m

UDL , w = 18.69 KN/m

Distance Moment Shear

7 At support 0 -2.184 214.95

2. Due to self-weight of cast-in-situ deck slab

UDL , w2 = 19.200 KN/m

Supp. Reaction , R = 209.280 KN

7 At support 0 -1.54 201.60

Weight of green concrete = 26 kN/m3

Avg. , w1 = 0.660 KN/m

UDL , w2 = 0.660 KN/m