Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CMDH 172 2010 03 2023 - Tracking Table Article 5 FOR WEBSITE
CMDH 172 2010 03 2023 - Tracking Table Article 5 FOR WEBSITE
CMDH 172 2010 03 2023 - Tracking Table Article 5 FOR WEBSITE
Section of the
Proposed
Classification Date issued Summary of the proposed change
classification
Guideline
A. ADMINSTRATIVE CHANGES
B. QUALITY CHANGES
B.I. ACTIVE SUBSTANCE
B.I.a) Manufacture
B.I.d) Stability
B.II.b) Manufacture
B.II.d) Control of finished product Change in the microbiological purity specification parameters of the
finished product to comply with Ph.Eur. A change to the finished
products specifications in order to comply with Ph. Eur. could also
possibly be acceptable as a Type IA notification in certain
B.II.d.1.z 12/20/2010 IB
circumstances, taking into account the general acceptance that the
Reduction in the
new limits are testing frequency
acceptable of an analysis,
for the specific from routine
dosage forms. It is up to
B.II.d.1. z 12/20/2010 testing to skip or periodic testing (microbial testing of finished of the
the Applicant to provide all necessary data for the justification IB
product).
classification.
Change in the specification parameters and/or limits of the finished
B.II.d.1.z 12/20/2010 product to more accurately describe the appearance of the drug IA
product.
B.III.2.z) CEP/TSE/MONOGRAPHS
Note: This variation covers the situation where the inclusion of ADR
C.I.z 6/7/2013 IAIN
reporting is not done as part of another regulatory procedure (e.g.
renewal or variation procedure affecting the product information).
Change(s) in the Summary of product Characteristics, Labelling or
Package Leaflet intended to implement the outcome of a PRAC
C.I.z 7/1/2013 IAIN
signal recommendation: implementation of wording agreed by the
competent authority that do not require any further assessment
Deletion of product name from list in PIL, following withdrawal of MA Article 61(3)
N/A 4/26/2010
in the relevant CMS. notification
NONE (to be
Change in dimensions of the secondary packaging of a medicinal
N/A 7/26/2010 considered on a
product
national level)
This is considered
not to be possible,
as the generic then
will be regarded as
Change of reference medicinal product before initiating a repeat use another medicinal
N/A 3/16/2012
procedure for a generic product product, and would
require a separate
Marketing
Authorisation
Application
Addition of a storage site which is separate from, but linked to a No variation as
N/A 5/25/2016 Change of the Reference standard material: Addition of
manufacturing site. covered by GMP
pharmacopeial reference standards (Ph. Eur. and/or USP) as No change
N/A 12/14/2016
replacement or alternative to the currently approved in-house necessary
reference standards (CTD Module 3.2.S.5, 3.2.P.6).
* The EMA does not support the recommendation given by the CMDh. The EC has been informed accordingly.
The material of the container closure system must remain the same.
N/A
N/A
The remaining packaging must be adequate for the storage of the bulk or
final active substance at the authorised conditions.
N/A
N/A
The secondary packaging does not play a functional role on the stability
of the bulk product, or if it does, it is not less protective than the
approved one.
N/A
1. There should at least remain one manufacturing process, as
previously authorised;
2. The deletion should not be due to critical deficiencies concerning
manufacturing
As condition 2 is not fulfilled, the change should be submitted as a type
IB variation
N/A
N/A
Compliance with the conditions formulated in the EMA TSE Note for
Guidance has to be ensured.
N/A
N/A
1. The specification of the excipient fully complies with the Ph. Eur.
Monograph and all the tests in the
specification correspond to the pharmacopoeial standard
2. Additional specifications to the pharmacopoeia for product specific
properties are unchanged (e.g. particle size profiles, polymorphic form
or, e.g. bioassays, aggregates)
3. The excipient must remain the same
4. Additional validation of a new or changed pharmacopoeial method is
not required
5. The excipient was already considered not novel for the use in relation
to the specific route of administration.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
However, if the change also impacts any other section of Module 3 (e.g.
the actual description of the analytical method itself) then a suitable
variation application will need to be submitted
N/A