SA919KL

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Proceedings of the 26th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2022)

The Improvement of Company Performance Based on Integrated Quality and Risk


Management Approach
Agnese KAUŠKALE and Gaļina ROBERTSONE
Riga Technical University, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management
Kalnciema iela 6, Riga, LV-1048, Latvia

ABSTRACT production to reduce uncertainty and disruption in the production


process. Risk identification and mitigation can help developing
Nowadays, Quality and Risk management plays an important role effective and appropriate transition strategies [4].
in ensuring the high quality of products following the established The scientific goal of this research is to analyze the theoretical
laws, requirements, or customer needs. Maintaining quality aspects of the performance in the company, as well as to offer
management in a company is essential both for maintaining solutions to improve quality and risk management using quality
process efficiency and product quality and reducing costs. The aim improvement methods.
of this paper is to analyze how improving quality and risk The paper is organized as following: in the Section 2 a literature
management affects the overall performance of the selected overview on the benefits of integrated management systems, with
company, also focusing on integration opportunities and a focus on quality and risk management and the reduction of
improvement. The analysis is performed in a manufacturing customers' complaints, was performed, followed by a qualitative
company with more than 1,000 employees. Qualitative research content analysis of the selected literature on the benefits of an
methods are applied in the paper. Based on the theoretical research integrated management system. In Section 3 the authors perform
and analysis of the organization, the authors identify the main quality and risk management system assessment in the
problems and propose possible improvement solutions. manufacturing company, while in Section 4 they describe the main
results of the analysis. The conclusions are given in Section 5.
Keywords: Quality management, Risk management, Integrated
Management System
2. INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

1. INTRODUCTION The integrated management system (IMS) covers all areas of the
company's operations and processes. It’s traditionally considered
Product quality is one of the most critical characteristics from the to be a partially or fully integrated management system that
point of view of the producer and the consumer in the various includes quality and environmental, occupational health, safety,
industries. Improving product quality is essential in today's global and other areas of the company [5].
competition [1]. Today, quality is also considered the most An integrated management system allows the integration of
important competitive advantage in the world [2]. Implementing different management areas to better manage and control them
quality management in a company has its benefits - continuous with the knowledge of those responsible. Various authors have
improvement, improvements in customer satisfaction, increased mentioned the benefits of the implementation of an integrated
productivity, greater employee involvement and teamwork, which management system (see Table 1). As the study examines the
enable the company to be more profitable among competitors and integrated management system and seeks the benefits of its
gain more customer trust. In terms of customer satisfaction, implementation, a content analysis of the selected literature is a
employee satisfaction and involvement must also be considered as suitable method for collecting and summarizing qualitative
nothing would be done without them. Modern approaches to information from various authors and analyzing scientific articles
quality management, its elements, concepts and guidelines can be to the desired extent. Content analysis shows that most often, in
found in various quality management models like EFQM Model, selected publications, the benefits of implementing an integrated
Management system standards, MBNQA, Total Quality system are reduced costs and resource usage, as well as improved
Management, and other models. Each company can choose the performance and increased productivity. So, integration allows for
model that suits them the best or draw on guidelines from several optimizing the use of various company resources, managing them
models. better, and reducing duplication. Optimization of the company's
Integration can be considered if the company works according to operations and processes increases performance and productivity,
several management standards. Integration is not an obligation but so not only will the company's overall performance be improved,
an opportunity to take advantage of the benefits of integration. The but the contribution to profits will also be visible. The general
integration of management systems is not a mandatory improvements in the organizational culture can undoubtedly be
requirement for an organization when it has two or more standards highlighted, which means that the company's structural units are
management systems in place, but rather the ability to use more connected. There is an improvement in communication
synchronization in resources and skills, as recommended by the between them and an overall improvement in motivation.
standards themselves [3]. It can be concluded that these benefits are accompanied by
Customer demands are growing daily, leading to fierce continuous improvement, as the company needs to monitor the
competition and frequent product development and project growth. current situation in both the industry and the market in order to be
This results in a more significant number of product variants and able to maintain the highest possible level of performance.
periodic changes. Risk management is a key factor in increasing

ISBN: 978-1-950492-65-7
ISSN: 2771-0947 92 https://doi.org/10.54808/WMSCI2022.02.92
Proceedings of the 26th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2022)

Table 1. Benefits obtained in the content analysis [created by authors]


Benefit Key References Frequency
Reduction of costs and usage of resources [12;14;16;17;18;19;20;21;22;23;25;26;27;28;29;30;34;37] 18

A common policy, strategy, and objectives [12;20;22] 3

Improvements in organizational culture [14;15;16;17;18;20;21;27;28;32;35] 11

Increasing competitiveness [15;20;26;27;28;31;32;33;35;36] 10

Improving efficiency [16;17;27;28;29;30;37;33;36] 9

Improved performance / increased [16;17;18;19;20;22;24;25;27;28;29;30;37;31;32;33;34;35] 18


productivity

Improvement of overall results [16;19;26] 3

Better risk control [20;22;28;35;36] 5


.

3. QUALITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS eliminate them are determined. The audits also cover various
documentation - the quality manual itself, the ISO 9015: 2015 and
Quality throughout the company's day-to-day operations is fully ISO 50001: 2018 standard requirements, last year's internal audit
embedded in goals and values. For the company to operate report, documents related to the management of products and
efficiently and produce the highest possible quality products, the processes, process monitoring, and work instructions. Quality
company applies and acts in accordance with the ISO 9001: 2015 management primarily ensures trust in the produced products,
as well as ISO 50001: 2018 and ISO 14001:2015 standards services, and company.
requirements. ISO standards are designed to be applicable to all When planning and implementing a quality management system,
sectors of the economy, organizations of all types and sizes, and the company considers the external and internal conditions binding
different geographical, cultural, and social contexts. Many ISO on the organization, the interests of stakeholders, and identified
standards have the same structure, terms, definitions, and risks.
requirements. Management system standards are based on the Risk management is critical for decision-makers to minimize or
same type of management principles and institutional mitigate the effects of risks, assess the potential impact of risks on
arrangements [7]. The benefits of using the ISO 9000 family of company performance, to ensure actual measurement of risk
standards include creating, maintaining, and improving efficient throughout the organization. Risks are identified and evaluated
business processes, reducing losses, increasing productivity, better both for processes and, where relevant, for products. Identifying
marketing, and most importantly, increasing and maintaining risks and how to deal with them is integrated into the processes and
customer satisfaction. Certification is also often seen as a included in the process descriptions. The process description sets
prerequisite and an advantage over other companies. Certification out how to deal with the identified risks to reduce the negative
expands business opportunities, increasing market share and impact of the risks, increase the benefits of the realized
overall competitiveness [11]. The company has developed and opportunities, facilitate the achievement of the objectives of the
maintains a Quality manual based on this standard. Top quality management system and promote improvements. The
management defines and approves the organization's quality extent of the planned actions in relation to the risks is proportional
policy, which is in line with the organization's context and strategic to their potential impact on the process or product. The business
direction; it includes a commitment to comply with applicable process specialist and business process coordinator are responsible
requirements and continuously improve the quality management for the development of process risk assessment methodologies,
system. An essential part of quality management is the maintaining and monitoring the risk register, and coordinating risk
involvement of all employees in the organization. For this purpose, assessment. The process owner is responsible for:
a regular exchange of information between the company's 1. Identification of risks to significant processes;
managers, employees, work groups, and departments is ensured. 2. Risk assessment;
Internal audits are planned and carried out at regular intervals to 3. Development of risk reduction measures;
assess the adequacy of the quality management system. Internal 4. Control over the implementation of risk reduction measures,
audit is essential in evaluating the company's overall performance informing the persons responsible for risk reduction measures
to determine the efficiency of operations and make all necessary (including in other structural units);
improvements to increase efficiency even more [6]. An audit 5. Evaluating the effectiveness of the actions taken.
program is developed every year, its criteria and scope are defined Risk assessment of significant environmental aspects is a
for each audit, and competent auditors are appointed. The audit requirement of the international standard ISO 14001:2015. On this
results are reported to the manager responsible for the department. basis, in cooperation with the environmental risk analyst, the
In cases of non-compliances identified during the audits, their environmental specialist performs a risk assessment of all
causes are identified, and the necessary corrective actions to

93
Proceedings of the 26th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2022)

identified significant aspects, determining the degree of There are seven different defect types:
environmental risk. 1. Printing errors - the main causes are equipment that is either
Risk management is a set of technical, organizational, and legal not adequately maintained or incorrectly set up. All equipment
measures aimed at reducing the probability of the occurrence of an maintenance schedules should be checked to see if they meet
adverse event and the magnitude of possible consequences [13]. all needs, and staff should be reminded how to set up the
The initial step in the risk management process is to identify the equipment correctly and where to look how to do it right;
risks to which the company is exposed in its operating 2. Waviness - indicates that the rollers are not working
environment. These could be legal, environmental, market, synchronously, it also indicates a lack of maintenance or
regulatory, and other risks. It is essential to identify as many of incorrect use of compressive force. Equipment's maintenance
these risks as possible. Being aware of the root cause of adverse schedules must be checked and a visible material showing all
outcomes helps organizations anticipate and manage events that the compressive forces for the range must be created;
might affect their reputation [8]. Once the risk has been identified, 3. Broken mesh - it is concluded that the footage or circulation is
it needs to be analyzed. The impact of risk needs to be identified, exceeded, mostly due to the employees' negligence. The
considering its relationship with various organizational factors. To timeliness of the data sheet must be monitored;
determine the severity and significance of a risk, it is necessary to 4. Edge defects - firstly due to inaccurate setting of the machine
understand the magnitude of the impact and the risk to the business - depending on the competence of the employee or the
function as a whole. There are risks that, in case of occurrence, topicality of the data sheet, secondly, inadequate quality of the
could halt or considerably affect the organization's operations. scissors, which shows that the scissors wear and must be
Still, there are also risks that could cause only minor monitored and replaced regularly in a controlled manner;
inconvenience, as the risk analysis shows. In the risk identification 5. Skewness - it is necessary to monitor the wear of the
phase, the risks affecting the company objectives should be equipment, or to detect deviations, so the process must be
prioritized [9]. followed and updated accordingly;
Investing time and effort in managing risks is a worthwhile 6. Textile defects - raw material of an inadequate quality, which
investment and makes good business sense. Ultimately effective means that there were non-compliances in quality control that
risk management could make a difference between the survival and were not observed. Sometimes there is a shortage of staff and
failure of the business [10]. inspectors have wider trajectories to check. Sometimes too few
In this company, the risk assessment in production is particularly quality checks are performed directly in the laboratories. The
important for environmental protection due to the usage of sampling size is specified in the test plans, but when these are
different chemical components. updated, the relevant laboratory staff is not always informed
about it;
7. Unclean mesh - the overall maintenance of the equipment must
4. MAIN RESULTS OF ANALYSIS be controlled, or action plans must be established to prevent
defects.
The main risk of quality loss is the non-compliance of the
production requirements with the customer's requirements. In the category of machinery, it was concluded that a lot of
Customer complaints are reviewed, and cause groups are equipment had been around since the company was founded,
determined (see Figure 1). which means that it is worn out, and for some equipment it is
already difficult to find parts. The second main reason is related to
the maintenance schedules: they have been established, but they
Customer claims should be revised more often to refer more to the equipment's wear
and tear. In the category of method, it was concluded that there are
two main groups - quality certificates and processes. Some
customers need certificates confirming the requirements set by the
Production
customer. Certificates are written manually, which means that the
13% employee can make mistakes, enter incorrect data, or do not check
Transport the timeliness of the sample certificate, resulting in an invalid
25% certificate being sent to the customer. Processes often do not
62% correspond to the current situation, which means that the
Administrative department head should communicate with his employees and then
make the necessary changes to the process descriptions with
business process specialists so that they are appropriate and that
employees, especially new employees, can perform their duties. In
the category of people, two main reasons are detected: there are
Figure 1. Distribution of received complaints into categories times when there is a shortage of staff, which can lead to fewer
[created by authors] quality checks and lead to defects, and lack of training when the
established training period is set too short. Of course, there may be
Many customer complaints are related to damage to the goods a shortage of qualified personnel in the labor market; however, the
during transportation; packaging quality is also mentioned in the actions shall be planned and performed to provide all the necessary
complaints. Administrative complaints mostly are related to the staff. When the training period is too short, the deadlines are also
finance department, and most of the causes are assignable to the extended, but not always, so the line manager should keep a close
employee’s mistakes. Most complaints in production are eye on whether the new employee has received sufficient training.
connected to a lack of product quality. For the root-cause analysis The last category is materials. The causes are related to the
of the customer complaints the authors created an Ishikawa inadequate quality of incoming raw material that comes to the
diagram. The causes were grouped into five categories - machines, production. It means that the incoming material quality controls
method, people, defects, and material. The largest number of are insufficient. The second reason is that packaging materials are
complaints is directly related to the defects due to lack of quality not of the best quality. Engineers should determine the criteria
(see Table 2).

94
Proceedings of the 26th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2022)

Figure 2. Ishikawa diagram causes of external complaints for defects [created by authors]

required for quality packaging materials so that the product would company's overall performance, and focus on why it is important
not be damaged when delivered to the customer. to be aware of and meet all the necessary requirements. The
In general, it can be concluded that it is very important that all establishment of a integrated risk register, setting out all the
equipment is in the best possible technical condition, that repairs required criteria to ensure a better understanding of the risks to
are carried out on time, and that maintenance is carried out in the employees, both with regard to process or product risks and risks
same way. The company should review the technical condition of with hazardous chemicals or environmental risks, as well as other
all equipment and carry out targeted refurbishment or replacement risks identified in the company, would improve company’s
of equipment. The second most common cause is competence and performance.
shortage of staff.
Depending on the production department, the company must
communicate directly with the line managers so that all relevant 5. CONCLUSIONS
information is provided promptly and employees are reminded of
the importance of quality in the production of products. Managers The main objective of quality and risk management is to ensure the
need to create informative visual material, Standard Operating company's success by improving its performance. The
Procedures, as an example to prevent the presence of a human involvement of senior management is required to provide all the
factor causing the appearance of defects and noncompliances and necessary resources. The integrated approach to identifying and
to ensure that all equipment, depending on the range on the meeting customer requirements, dealing with complaints and
production line, is set up accurately. Train staff in quality control noncompliances, will significantly improve the quality of products
so that all inspections are carried out in a timely manner, and in the and increase customer satisfaction. The identification and
event of a defect being detected as soon as possible. It is also prevention of risks also has a significant positive impact on
recommended to consider and finance the purchase of new protecting workers and environment.
packaging materials of a higher quality.
Because quality and risk management are closely linked,
integration into common areas will help employees manage their 6. REFERENCES
work more efficiently. The company could start by developing a
common integrated policy that can give an idea of the factors for [1] A. Tavakoli, A. Azizi “Models, Techniques and Indicators of
all areas of the standards, how much each area affects the Quality Management Assessment in Manufacturing

95
Proceedings of the 26th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2022)

Industries Over the Past Decade”, International Journal of [19] G. Valencia, C.H. Acevado, Y.C. Escorcia “A Systematic
Applied Research in Management and Economics, Vol. 1, Procedure to Combine the Integral Management Systems in a
No. 3, 2018, pp. 1-13. Services Sector Company”, Chemical Engineering
[2] R. John, A. Smitht, S. Chotipanich, M. Pitt “Awareness and
Transactions, Vol. 67, 2018, pp. 373-378.
effectiveness of quality function deployment (QFD) in design
[20] S. Talapatra, G. Santos, K. Uddin, F.J. da Fonseca Carvalho,
and build projects in Nigeria”, Journal of Facilities
“Main benefits of integrated management systems through
Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2014, pp. 72-88.
literature review”, International Journal for Quality
[3] R. Salomone “Integrated management systems: experiences
Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019, pp. 1037-1054.
in Italian organizations”, Journal of Cleaner Production,
[21] P. Sampaio, P. Saraiva, P. Domingues “Management
Vol. 16, 2008, pp. 1786-1806.
Systems: Integration or addition?”, International Journal of
[4] E.J. Mamaghani, K. Medini “Resilience, agility and risk
Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2012,
management in production ramp-up”, Procedia CIRP, Vol.
pp. 402-424.
103, 2021, pp. 37-41.
[22] M.F. Rebelo, G. Santos, R. Silva “Conception of a flexible
[5] I. Mežinska, I. Lapiņa, J. Mazais “Integrated Management
integrator and lean model for integrated management
Systems towards Sustainable and Socially Responsible
systems”, Total Quality Management and Business
Organisation”, Total Quality Management & Business
Excellence, Vol. 25, No.5-6, 2014, pp. 683-701.
Excellence, Vol.26, No. 5-6, 2015, pp.469-481.
[23] M.F. Rebelo, G. Santos, R. Silva “Integration of Standardized
[6] G.S. Cordoş, “Analysis of Internal Audit Practices on
Management Systems: A Dilemma?”, Systems, Vol. 3, No. 2,
FTSE100”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 15,
2015, pp. 45-59.
2015, pp. 1265-1272.
[24] M. Ikram, R. Sroufe, Q. Zhang “Prioritizing and overcoming
[7] I. Heras-Saizarbitoria, O. Boiral “ISO 9001 and ISO 14001:
barriers to integrated management system (IMS)
Towards a Research Agenda on Management System
implementation using AHP and G-TOPSIS”, Journal of
Standards”, International Journal of Management
Cleaner Production, Vol. 254, 2020, pp. 1-17.
Reviews, Vol. 15, 2013, pp. 47–65.
[25] A. Simon, S. Karapetrovic, M. Casadesus “Evolution of
[8] J. Lamont, “Risk management: Reputation is everything”,
Integrated Management Systems in Spanish firms”, Journal
KM World, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2015, pp. 10-11.
of Cleaner Production, Vol. 23., No. 1, 2012, pp. 8-19.
[9] J. Tamošaitiene, M. Khosravi, M. Cristofaro, D. W.M.Chan,
[26] M. Casadesus, S. Karapetrovic, I. Heras-Saizarbitoria
H. Sarvari “Identification and Prioritization of Critical Risk
“Synergies in standardized management systems: Some
Factors of Commercial and Recreational Complex Building
empirical evidence”, TQM Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2011,
Projects: A Delphi Study Using the TOPSIS Method”,
pp. 73-86.
Applied Science, Vol. 11, 2021, pp. 1-24.
[27] T.V Nunhes, M. Bernardo, O.J. Oliveira “Guiding principles
[10] A. Osborne, Risk Management Made Easy., Andy
of integrated management systems: Towards unifying a
Osburne&Ventus Publishing ApS, 2013.
starting point for researchers and practitioners”, Journal of
[11] M. Kavosa, I. Lapiņa “Risk analysis in certification process
Cleaner Production, Vol. 210, 2018, pp. 977-993.
in the field of energy construction: case in Latvia”, Total
[28] N. Hamidi, M. Omidvari, M. Meftahi “The effect of
Quality Management & Business Excellence, Vol. 29, No.
integrated management system on safety and productivity
10, 2018, pp. 1129-1142.
indices: Case study; Iranian cement industries”, Safety
[12] R. Salomone “Integrated management systems: experiences
Science, Vol. 50, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1180-1189.
in Italian organizations”, Journal of Cleaner Production,
[29] P. Bak, A. Nowak “The method of improving the functioning
Vol. 16, 2008, pp. 1786-1806.
of an integrated management system in a mining enterprise”,
[13] Darba vides risku novērtēšanas vadlīnijas, Rīga, 2013.
Gospodarka surowcami mineralnymi – mineral resources
[14] G. Santos, F. Mendes, J. Barbosa” Certification and
management, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2019, pp. 175-186.
integration of management systems: the experience of
[30] A. Hernandez-Vivanco, P. Domingues, P. Sampaio, M.
Portuguese small and medium enterprises”, Journal of
Bernardo “Do multiple certifications leverage firm
Cleaner Production, Vol.19, 2011, pp. 1965-1974.
performance? A dynamic approach”, International Journal
[15] T.H. Jorgensen, A. Remmen, M.D. Mellado “Integrated
of Production Economics, Vol. 218, 2019, pp. 386-399.
management systems e three different levels of integration”,
[31] M. Dragomir, S. Popescu, C. Neamtu, D. Dragomir, S. Bodi
Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, 2006, pp. 713-722.
“Seeing the immaterial: a new instrument for evaluating
[16] O.J. Oliveira “Guidelines for the integration of certifiable
integrated management systems’ maturity”, Sustain Times,
management systems in industrial companies”, Journal of
Vol. 9, 2017, pp. 1–14.
Cleaner Production, Vol. 57, No. 15, 2013, pp. 124-133.
[32] G. Ofori, G. Gang, C. Briffett “Implementing environmental
[17] M. Bernardo, A. Simon, J.J. Tari, J. Molina-Azorin “Benefits
management systems in construction: lessons from quality
of management systems integration: a literature review”,
systems”, Building and Environment, Vol. 37, No. 12,
Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 94, 2015, pp. 260-267.
2002, pp. 1397-1407.
[18] R.A.A. Rueda, G.C.J.P. Gomez “Triad of the Articulation
[33] M. Llonch, M. Bernardo, P. Presas “A case study of a
Model of Integrated Management Systems [TAM -
simultaneous integration in an SME: implementation process
(HSEQ)]”, TECCIENCIA, Vol. 11, 2015, pp. 19-26.
and cost analysis”, International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2018, pp. 319–333.

96
Proceedings of the 26th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2022)

[34] J. Fresner, G. Engelhardt “Experiences with integrated


management systems for two small companies in Austria”,
Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2004, pp.
623–631.
[35] F. Laal, M. Pouyakian, R.F. Madvari, A. Khoshakhlangh,
G.H. Halvani “Investigating the Impact of Establishing
Integrated Management Systems on Accidents and Safety
Performance Indices: A Case Study”, Safety and Health at
Work, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2019, pp. 54-60.
[36] D. Ramos, P. Afonso, M.A. Rodrigues “Integrated
management systems as a key facilitator of occupational
health and safety risk management: A case study in a medium
sized waste management firm”, Journal of Cleaner
Production, Vol. 262, 2020, pp. 1-11.
[37] G. Dahlin, R. Isaksson “Integrated management systems -
interpretations, results, opportunities”, TQM Journal, Vol.
29, 2017, pp. 528–542.

97

You might also like