Struggling with your European Union Law dissertation? You're not alone.

Crafting a dissertation on
this complex subject can be an arduous task, requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and a deep
understanding of legal frameworks and policies within the European Union.

From navigating the intricate web of EU treaties to examining the implications of recent legal
decisions, the process can be overwhelming for even the most dedicated students. Add to that the
pressure of meeting academic deadlines and maintaining high standards of quality, and it's no wonder
many students find themselves at a loss.

But fear not, help is at hand. At ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, we understand the challenges students face
when tackling their EU Law dissertations. That's why we offer expert assistance from seasoned
professionals with years of experience in the field. Our team of writers specializes in EU Law and
can provide tailored support to help you craft a dissertation that meets your unique requirements and
exceeds academic expectations.

Whether you're struggling to choose a topic, formulate a research question, or structure your
argument, our dedicated writers are here to help. We'll work closely with you to understand your
needs and provide personalized guidance every step of the way. With our assistance, you can
navigate the complexities of EU Law with confidence and clarity, ensuring your dissertation stands
out for all the right reasons.

Don't let the challenges of writing a European Union Law dissertation hold you back. Order from ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ today and take the first step towards academic success.
On the basis of the above, it could be said that although the SFA has valid legal reasons, it has to
approach UK national courts before seeking relief from EC. In other words, the european union as
we have it today developed from the need to form a unified market and make rules to regulate. This
Test is a derivative of the case of Plaumann v. We use cookies to create the best experience for you.
When a judge makes an observation on the legality of the subject matter of the case but when that
issue does not require a decision, then such an observation is termed as an obiter dictum. This
practice has resulted in a number of barriers for the UK courts to integrate the EU law with their
national legislation1. In this case the SFA, on behalf of its aggrieved members does have the
necessary locus standi to contest the decision of the EC. Gordon Anthony. UK Public Law and
European Law: The Dynamics of Legal Integration. 2002, Hart Publishing. As mentioned above this
is discrimination on grounds of nationality. Art 31(2) states that workers are entitled to daily and
weekly rest periods besides a limitation to maximum working hours.12 This is however not a law.
Member States must therefore enforce Regulations ( Commission v UK: Re Tachographs (1979)).
6.5.6 Regulations, by their very nature, are capable of having both vertical and horizontal direct
effect ( Leonesio v Ministero dell’Agricoltura (1972)). In order to interpret the EU law, the European
Court of Justice mainly depends on three sources; namely, the EU Treaties, Articles of the Treaties
and provisions of EU law. It is seen that the UK Company runs grave risk of action from the EC for
alleged non compliance of chemical discharge concerns, and also in terms of violating EC directives
for enforcement of a mandated testing regime. This will ensure legal certainty and legal authority.
Member States refer cases of infringement of EU law to the ECJ for the proper interpretation of EU
law2. Radiology Assistant helps students find the right radiology degree. The basic structure of the
courts is apparently determined with respect to the issues and subject of the cases, rather than the
applicable legal provisions. In this case, the Courts may apply the Plaumann Test. Article 31 of the
Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union provides for fair and just working conditions
for the workers. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Administrative law deals with the relationships of citizens with the state. Besides if Klaus and his
family based their defence on the elements mentioned above (Law of free Movement of Person),
they have a great chance of not being expulsing and will have the opportunity to benefit fully of
their rights as E.U Members State. En als je ervoor bent aangemeld ook in notificaties en
nieuwsbrieven. The laws grouped under primary sources include; Treaty Articles, Treaty of Lisbon,
and Treaty of the european union. With that status it deals with appeals from the Commonwealth
countries. We controleren wel eerst of ’ie voldoet aan onze reviewvoorwaarden en niet nep is. The
limitations specified in Article 39(3) E.C able an EU country to take any decision in relation to the
residence on grounds of public order, public security or public health (Article 39(3)) (ex48 (3)), the
person must be aware o the reasons for this decision. The new edition incorporates numerous learning
aids, including; summaries; end of chapter questions for self-testing and reflection; updated flow
diagrams; a glossary of terms and important tips on how to approach examination questions. Hence,
the magistrate courts refer such cases to Crown Court for passing sentence. One of the major
changes made by the Amsterdam Treaty is the introduction of the new EC Treaty title on “visas,
asylum, immigration and the Free Movement of Persons” that help to ensure “freedom and security”
to all Members State.
The ECJ introduced the principle in NV Algemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend
en Loos v. Effects of the European Union on England and Wales Law. It must be noted that
directives cannot have horizontal direct effect since they only affect relationship between an
individual and the State or local authorities or public sector industries. As mentioned above this is
discrimination on grounds of nationality. Although the UK courts have recognised this fact, they
find it an onerous task to rescind their traditional outlook, while respecting the EU law and
interpreting it in the context of their national legislation. Since the directives are directed against
Member States, the ECJ has not allowed to extend the horizontal direct effect for claims by
individuals against other individuals or private employers. 9 It was the Francovich 10case that paved
way for suing of the Government by the individuals for any losses due to failure to implement a
Directive. The laws grouped under primary sources include; Treaty Articles, Treaty of Lisbon, and
Treaty of the european union. European Commission will investigate the complaint and call for
explanation from the Member State. Fully revised and updated, this fifth edition continues to look at
the main themes of EU law in a logical and progressive manner. The aim of a directive is achieve the
substance rather than the form. Treaty articles are capable of both types of direct effect. This is
because there are others who have also been affected by the EC’s decision and SFA’s is not a unique,
singular, or individual case. To help assess whether workers of different sex are paid equally for work
of equal value, The European Commission has issued a “Code of practice on the implementation of
equal pay for work of equal vale for women and men”. Thus it is incumbent on individual states to
frame laws and regulations that would provide environment settings for enforcement of laws
executed in individual cases, and for taking appropriate steps for non compliance. It also gives them
additional rights and responsibilities. In addition, having a criminal record is not, in itself, sufficient
grounds to justify such a measure automatically. Such decisions have a binding nature on the rulings
in subsequent cases, under the doctrine of judicial precedent16. The UK cannot escape from being
penalised for breach of EU law; and it cannot determine the scope and extent of the penalties
imposed upon it. Updated to recognise the increasing significance of citizenship on the Free
Movement of Persons, this book provides the reader with a clear understanding of EU law,
concentrating on how, and especially why, the law has developed as it has. This latter principle
applies to all other breaches of Community law ( Brasserie du Pecheur v Federal Republic of
Germany; joined with R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (1996)). This is
because the chief consideration is to provide justice to the individual rather than the creation of legal
certainty. They do not have the power to pass sentence over and above a certain level of severity.
Thus, a Member State which does not adopt a directive within the prescribed time limit for
transposition, may not act up on the individuals.11 This leads to a rationale that the present estate
facilitator can rely on the enforcement of the directive in the national court as an individual against
the member state both for denial of rest period and training on the lifting equipment whether he is
under a under a private employer or a local authority which is an emanation of the Member State. In
addition to formal contracts, the law also relates to other looser types of cooperation among
businesses. “Adopting an economics-based approach to Article 82 will also unify and provide a
clearer and more consistent enforcement approach of the Treaty provisions on competition law ” (The
Reform of Article 82: Recommendations on Key Policy Objectives 2005, p. In this case the SFA, on
behalf of its aggrieved members does have the necessary locus standi to contest the decision of the
EC. With reference to the principle of proportionality, the Belgian authorities cannot claim that the
absence of rind is a major characteristic that justifies its refusal of the use of the “Port Southampton”
designation or its sale in Belgium. The need for integration arose following the numerous problems
and challenges that occurred across Europe because of the Second World WarSince then, various
efforts have been undertaken to ensure integration between member states over the years since the
formation of the European Economic Community to the formation of the european union and its
subsequent expansion to the current 28 member states. The charge on the importation of film for
production is therefore not compatible under the european union law. Gordon Anthony. UK Public
Law and European Law: The Dynamics of Legal Integration. 2002, Hart Publishing. The acts whose
validity could be challenged under Article 230(4) EC could be as follows.
Nevertheless it will be hard for the company to explain objectively to the court the motivations
behind these inequalities instead of under Sex Discrimination. The reliability of EC law is made
certain by its supremacy over national law and this is the fundamental value of EC law when
developed by means of the European Court of Justice. In addition, the Appellate Committee also
acts as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. This is known as ratio decidendi, or the legal
reasoning behind a judgement or the basis for arriving at such a decision. This is 100% legal. You
may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you. There are two hundred
and eighteen county courts for hearing civil cases and most of the civil actions are determined by
them. We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Especially section 3 directs national
courts to adopt the decisions of the ECJ as precedents to be applicable to the national courts. She
claimed it was a breach of Article 119(now 141) of the Treaty. Thus, a Member State which does not
adopt a directive within the prescribed time limit for transposition, may not act up on the
individuals.11 This leads to a rationale that the present estate facilitator can rely on the enforcement
of the directive in the national court as an individual against the member state both for denial of rest
period and training on the lifting equipment whether he is under a under a private employer or a
local authority which is an emanation of the Member State. The Treaties are directly applicable in that
they are automatically incorporated into national law. Therefore, under EU laws it is possible for
party to “lodge a complaint with the Commission against a Member State for any measure (law,
regulation or administrative action) or practice attributable to a Member State which they consider
incompatible with a provision or a principle of Community law.” (Exercise Your Rights. (2008). He
could claim all financial benefits available to workers. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board
with our. The protection of the consumer can be maintained by appropriate information on the
labelling of the cheese and thus the Belgian legislation is in breach of Article 28EC for hindering the
free movement of goods. It is now necessary to consider the second part relating to chances of Sheep
Farmers’ Association (SFA) of establishing standing to challenge the Decision. This Direct effect can
be applied as Horizontal Direct Effect and Vertical Direct Effect depending on whom the right is
enforced against. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. The
Spanish fishermen challenged the legality of this Act before an English court, which referred the
case to the ECJ. Gennard John and Graham (2002) Employee Relations, 3rd Ed, London, CIPD
Publishing Tillotson John (2000) European Union Law; text, cases and materials, 3rd ed London
Routledge. Kies je voor weigeren, dan plaatsen we alleen functionele en analytische cookies. Their
Lordships also held that the defendants could have taken the case before the ECJ, in order to
institute a judicial review to interpret EU law and to rectify the breaching provisions of the Act, in
order to make it compatible with the EU law5. Therefore, prima facie, it appears that it was
obligatory on the part of UK Government to enforce compulsory testing norms, either directly or
indirectly. However, such referring states must have a legal relationship with the UK legislation15.
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. In other words it can be so worded so as to be
compatible with their national legislation. This was clearly established in several criminal cases such
as R v. R10. As such, the European Court of Justice can override all the decisions made by the
domestic courts, in cases pertaining to EC law11. He received an allowance, which was at a lower
rate than nationals were. She sues in High Court and that made an Article 177reference. The ECJ
held that the Act was in conflict with the EU law and should accordingly be rescinded.