OKORO John Bosco Chinedu

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
DAG Industries Nigeria Limited

Employee Code Employee Name Designation


OKORO John Bosco Chinedu ASM
Company Department Date Of Joining
DAG Motorcycle Industries (Nig.) Ltd Spares 11.06.2018
Location Reviewing Manager Amit Arora Performance Appraisal/Annual
Appraisal Period
Abakaliki,East
2023-2024

EVALUATE AND DESCRIBE PERFORMANCE AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS USING THE FOLLOWING


PERFORMANCE GROUPINGS: Kindly attach your KPI sheet and any document that helps
the management understand your performance

The sub-headings f o r each group are suggested criteria to be evaluated and are not intended to be all inclusive and may be

changed, deleted or added to as required. The comments area for each should be used for expansion, explanation ,

description of strengths and/or p r o b l e m areas for each grouping. Specific improvement actions, however, s h o u l d b e

described in the following s e c t i o n . Select the appropriate term below to describe performance for each category a n d

check off the appropriate rating number. Enter “NA” where the category does not apply to this position.

Consistently, over time, performs all duties in an exceptional manner; significantly exceeds EXCEPTIONAL
expectations with exceptional quality, quantity and timeliness of work; significantly exceeds 5
All objectives, always achieves exceptional results well beyond those expected of the
position. Note - usage of this category is highly limited.

Consistently exceeds the normal expectations for the position; exceeds expected criteria EXCEEDS
for quality, quantity and timeliness of work; consistently exceeds goals and objectives; 4
achieves results beyond those expected for the position.

Consistently performs all duties of the position in a fully capable manner; MEETS
meets all expected criteria for quality, quantity and timeliness of work, 3
including meeting goals and objectives.

Performs many duties in a capable manner; meets some goals and objectives, but MARGINAL
requires improvement in quality, quantity and timeliness of work to achieve overall 2
satisfactory performance; may require more supervision than expected for assignment.
Could be the performance level of those new to a position.

Unacceptable performance suggesting lack of willingness and/or ability to UNSATISFACTORY


perform the requirements of the position. Separation or reassignment is 1
indicated unless performance improves significantly. Requires excessive
supervision.

Signature of Employee Signature of Evaluator


SECTION -A

Rating by the
1. JOB KNOWLEDGE employee
(self-appraisal)
Employee displays a consistent level of job relevant knowledge. Regularly completes all of the normal work tasks of the job, and 5
at times unusual and difficult tasks, independently. Employee recognizes the importance of building and maintaining his/her job 4
knowledge. 3
2
Comments (by evaluator) 1
Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
2. PLANNING AND CONTROLLING
employee
Develops realistic plans that meet company goals and future needs. Exhibits foresight in recognizing potential problems and 5
develops solutions. Foresees changes and trends. Makes sound decisions to consider cost/benefit. Accurately estimates the 4
expense levels and usually comes up with innovative ideas to reduce expenses. 3
2
Comments (by evaluator) 1

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
3. WORK QUALITY
employee
Employee achieves intended or required outcomes, with an appropriate consumption of resources for the task at hand. 5
Completes the work assigned with an error or problem rate that is acceptable or typical for the type of work. Employee has the 4
willingness to self - correct for the errors and problems. 3
2
Comments (by evaluator) 1

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
4. WORK RATE
employee
Employee is aware of the need to produce an acceptable level of work output and usually can self - monitor and self - regulate 5
his/her on work rate to ensure the timely completion of all the needed tasks. 4
3
Comments (by evaluator) 2
1
Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
5. DESIRE TO LEARN
employee
Makes effort to improve academic, professional and work related knowledge. Responds effectively to the changing needs of the 5
department. Uses constructive feedback to improve performance. 4
3
Comments (by evaluator) 2
1
Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Reviewing Manager comments are mandatory in case Disagree / Strongly Disagree is marked for any of the above points

Signature of Employee Signature of Evaluator


SECTION - B

Rating by the
1. COMMUNICATIONS
employee
5
Maintains an effective communication channel, in writing and/or orally. Understands the need to initiate or respond to 4
information in an appropriate, timely and complete manner. Usually does not create situations where misunderstandings crop up
3
due to inappropriate communication.
2
Comments (by evaluator) 1

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
2. LEADERSHIP
employee
5
Employee sets high standards, establishes clear focus and direction. He/she has the ability to control, takes personal 4
Responsibility of things assigned and does not put the blame on others for wrong things. Employee is talented in self
3
- observation and self-analysis and has the capacity to maintain a balance between work and home.
2
Comments (by evaluator) 1

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
3.INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS
employee
5
Ability to establish and maintain positive and productive working relationships with co-workers, supervisors, clients, suppliers 4
and others. Is not involved in unnecessary or trivial disputes and misunderstandings. May show talents in special areas such as
3
conflict resolution, motivation, leadership etc.
2
Comments (by evaluator) 1

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
4. ATTENDANCE
employee
5
Employee shows consistency in turning up for work and completing their normal work hours. Usually provides a prompt 4
notification and reasonable explanation for any absences or lateness.
3
2
Comments (by evaluator) 1

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Rating by the
5. DEPENDABILITY
employee
5
Can be depended on to the plan and complete work assignments as required. 4
3
Comments (by evaluator) 2
1

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Reviewing Manager comments are mandatory in case Disagree / Strongly Disagree is marked for any of the above points

Signature of Employee Signature of Evaluator


SECTION - C
(Feedback not for evaluation)

Ques 1. List any training programs/ short - term courses you would like to undergo.

Ques 2. What problems and constraints influenced your work performance during the review period?

Ques 3. Is there anything in your job description which has become redundant, which you wish to change?

REVIEWER
GOALS / OBJECTIVES FOR THE NEXT REVIEW PERIOD

Signature Date

COMMENTS OF EMPLOYEE

"The ratings and comments in this appraisal are a fair and reasonable assessment of my work performance and
development needs."

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

"I believe that the goals set are fair and reasonable and I
will try to achieve them."

Strongly Agree Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree

Signature Date

REMARKS/ RECOMMENDATIONS BY HOD


(Recommendations like increase in salary change in designation, intra - departmental transfer, confirmation etc.)

Signature Date
DOC ID: DAG/IMS/HRA/F/02 REVISION NO:00
SECTION – D KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
 Please attach the Key performance indicators which have been handed over to you by your
immediate line manager.

REMARKS/ RECOMMENDATIONS BY HOD


(Recommendations like increase in salary change in designation, intra - departmental transfer, confirmation etc.)

Signature Date

REMARKS BY HR

Signature Date

REMARKS BY MANAGING DIRECTOR/DIRECTOR

Signature Date

Employee signature acknowledges receipt of review and does not necessarily indicate agreement.

OC ID: DAG/IMS/HRA/F/02 REVISION NO:00

You might also like