Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ae Mag-Isa 2013
Ae Mag-Isa 2013
Ae Mag-Isa 2013
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology OCTOBER 2013, Vol. 135 / 041007-1
C 2013 by ASME
Copyright V
Test No. Elastic modulus (GPa) Yield strength (0.2% offset) (MPa) Tensile strength (MPa) Elongation (%)
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology OCTOBER 2013, Vol. 135 / 041007-3
regime. This implies that the fatigue lives of copper thin film used • normal distribution
in this study could be governed by a single failure mechanism
over the entire life regime. This will also be discussed further in
1 1 2
sections Statistical Analysis and Discussion. f ðxÞ ¼ p ffiffiffiffiffi
ffi exp 2 ðx lÞ 1 < x < 1 (4)
r 2p 2r
Statistical Analysis where f(x) is the probability density function, r is the stand-
The statistical analysis was conducted from the fatigue life ard deviation, and l is the mean of the distribution.
obtained above. For the case at hand, K–S (Kolmogorov–Smirnov) • 3-parameter log-normal distribution
test [27] generally used to analyze probability distribution [28–30]
was utilized. Furthermore, in order to determine the ranking of dis- " #
tributions, various probability distributions and estimation methods flnððx hÞ=mÞg2
exp
for cumulative distribution functions (i.e., cumulative probability) 2r2
were examined. The estimation methods for the cumulative dis- f ðxÞ ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffi ; x h; m; r > 0 (5)
tribution functions (the rank methods) used in this study are as ðx hÞr 2p
follows [31]:
• modified Kaplan–Meier rank where f(x) is the probability density function, r is the shape
parameter, h is the location parameter, m is the scale
i 0:5 parameter.
Fðti Þ ¼ (1) • 2-parameter log-normal distribution
n
The case where h equals zero in Eq. (5)
• mean rank • 3-parameter Weibull distribution
i
Fðti Þ ¼ (2) y y0 n
nþ1 FðyÞ ¼ 1 exp ; y y0
n (6)
• median rank ¼ 0; y < y0
i 0:3
Fðti Þ ¼ (3) where y0 is the location parameter or minimum life, n is the
n þ 0:4 scale parameter or characteristic life, n is the shape parameter
or Weibull slope.
where F(ti) is the cumulative probability distribution function • 2-parameter Weibull
and ti is the failure time of component i. Likewise, the proba-
bility distributions considered in this study are listed below The case where y0 equals zero in Eq. (6).
in terms of cumulative distribution function or probability We would like to note at this point that for the 3-parameter
density function. The Latter can be obtained by differentiat- Weibull distribution plot, the related formula was modified as
ing the former [32] follows:
Ranking
Smax (MPa) F(x) estimation method First Second Third Fourth Fifth
y y0 n ln ln
1
¼ n lnðy y0 Þ n lnðnÞ (9)
FðyÞ 1 ¼ exp (7) FðyÞ 1
n
1 y y0 n The 3-parameter Weibull distribution should be linear when
ln ¼ (8) plotted in the probability paper by setting the left side of Eq. (9)
FðyÞ 1 n
Fig. 5 Variations in R values among the rankings: (a) modified Kaplan–Meier rank, (b) mean
rank, and (c) median rank
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology OCTOBER 2013, Vol. 135 / 041007-5
as the ordinate (y axis) and ln (y) in the right side as the abscissa determined as the most dominant probability distribution (i.e., first
(x axis). ranking). For example, Fig. 4 shows the plots on probability distri-
To determine the most dominant probability distribution (from bution papers for Smax ¼ 280 MPa that have the highest R value
those enumerated above) for each maximum stress, the fatigue for the respective rank methods. This technique for determining
lives were plotted on five different probability papers for each the probability distribution is often used for evaluating the distri-
of the respective estimation methods of cumulative distribution bution of the fatigue life of bulk materials [33,34].
functions. From these plots, using a linear regression analysis, the Table 3 shows the ranking in the probability distributions at
distribution parameters and the coefficient of correlation, R value each Smax using the above mentioned technique. As can be seen in
as a goodness-of-fit criterion were calculated and then the R Table 3, there is no clear distinction in the probability distribution
values were compared in order to establish a ranking of the according to the estimation methods for the cumulative distribu-
distributions. The distribution which has the highest R value was tion functions; Modified Kaplan–Meier rank, mean rank and
Fig. 7 PSN curves of copper thin film: (a) modified Kaplan–Meier rank, (b) mean rank, and (c)
median rank
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology OCTOBER 2013, Vol. 135 / 041007-7
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology OCTOBER 2013, Vol. 135 / 041007-9