PROJECT

+ 4
Student Name : Subject : Global Perspective
Grade/Class : 8 / Topic : Individual Research
Date : Teacher(s) : Ms. Mona & Ms J
Semester : 2 (Term 3) Parent’s Signature :
RESULT

Assessment Task
Individually, students will make a research draft with the topic of ‘Social Problem within school society’

Specific Task Requirements

• Each student will make their own draft using the template given below.
• Student will work in pairs, only to brainstorm and decide the research question.
• Student MUST SHOW their progress AT THE END OF EVERY GP MEETINGS.
• The draft should be submitted in a written form on a piece of A4 paper or book, not in digital form.
• Due date: 06 February 2024 (at the end of GP lesson)

Research Draft

Research question A question that underlying the whole research, it shouldn’t be too general, too
specific or too common. Each pair will have SAME research question

Issue (main What has been going on recently around the topic? Example of actual case of the
problem) topic (provide citation) – this section can be integrated with the background of
research

Background General explanation about the issue: why is it important to bring up the topic?
(reasoning) (provide citation)

Perspectives Statement from someone famous (scientist, public figure, etc) or religious /
(globally and/or scientific point of view that supports the topic - provide at least three perspectives
nationally) (provide citation) – this section can be integrated with the background of research
and/or the cause and consequences

Cause and Several arguments that support the topic - in a form of statements, at least two
consequences cause and two consequences (provide citation)

Claim & Evidence Several arguments that support the cause and consequences - in a form of
statements, scientific research results, surveys (quantitative data), religious values,
etc. (provide citation) – this section can be integrated with the cause and
consequences

Solution What should be done to solve the problem? (solution should be applicable).
Reason why the solution will work.
Steps on how to implement the solution.

References The list of all the sources in APA Style (use citation generator) and in alphabetical
order.

FR/MSCS/CRD/063-Rev01
Assessment Criteria
Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Need Improvement Poor
Research The question proposed is The question proposed The question proposed The question is
Question relevant, meaningful, not is relevant, but either is Googleable or ambiguous or rather
too simple or too broad too simple or too broad already commonly irrelevant
used
(10 pts) (7 pts) (5 pts) (2 pts)
The background of The background of The background of The background of
Background research is elaborate, research is well written research is not research is totally out
of Research coherent and covers the but key issue is not well elaborate enough, key of context
key issue thoroughly explained issue is vaguely
explained
(10 pts) (7 pts) (5 pts) (2 pts)
Cause & In depth analysis of the Adequate analysis of Basic analysis of the Shallow analysis of
Consequences cause & consequences the cause and cause & the discussed topic
of the discussed issues. consequences of the consequences of the with little to no
Able to mention more discussed issues. Able discuss issues, some explanation
than 2 causes & to mention 1-2 causes parts might be unclear
consequences and consequences
(10 pts) (7 pts) (5 pts)
(2 pts)
Course(s) of The goals are precise, The goals are precise, The goals are not The goals are totally
Action measurable, detailed and measurable, detailed really relevant to the out of context or non-
specific to the issue. but too general. issue and not detailed existent.
enough.
The steps are systematic, The steps are clear and There are no clear
chronological, clear, applicable but not well The steps are not steps towards the
concrete and applicable. organized. applicable and are too goals.
general.
Reason behind the Reason behind the The reason behind the The reason behind
program is strong, valid, program is strong but program is rather the program is totally
and well explained. not well explained weak and irrelevant to out of context or non-
the program. existent.
(30 pts) (25 pts) (20 pts) (10 pts)
Data Students can collect 10 Students can collect 7 – Students can collect 4 – Students can collect
Collection or more relevant and 9 relevant and 6 relevant and less than 4 relevant
trustworthy data from trustworthy data from trustworthy data from and trustworthy data
reliable sources reliable sources reliable sources from reliable sources
(10 pts) (7 pts) (5 pts) (2 pts)
Citation and Both citation and Both citation and Only one of the two Does not cites or
References references are properly references are (citation or references) provide the list of
provided (using APA provided but not being provided sources at all
Style) properly written (not in
APA Style)
(10 pts) (7 pts) (5 pts) (2 pts)
Progress column will only be ticked upon completion after every meeting
Progress after Meeting 1: 16 Jan 2024 Meeting 2: 23 Jan 2024 Meeting 3: 30 Jan 2024 Meeting 4: 6 Feb
every Completing the research Completing the Completing Cause, 2024
meeting question and the issue, background (reasoning) Consequences, Claim Completing Course of
and/ or some part of the and different and Evidence Action (applicable
background perspectives solution) and
References list
(5pts) (5pts) (5 pts) (5 pts)

Teacher’s Comment:

_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
FR/MSCS/CRD/063-Rev01
_______________________________________________________________________________________

FR/MSCS/CRD/063-Rev01