Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scmpe Summary
Scmpe Summary
Generic Classification:
• Internal costs: Costs which have a direct impact on income statement of a company
• External costs: Costs which are imposed on society at large
• There is an inverse relationship between internal and external costs
EMA Methodology related to management of Environmental Costs:
• Phase 1 – Identification of Environmental Costs (expressed and hidden)
• Phase 2 – Allocation of environmental costs to cost centre and cost units
• Phase 3 – Controlling environmental cost
Identification of Environmental Costs:
• EMA requires an intense review of general ledger – some expenses can be hidden as overheads
• Allocation of environment costs to products using appropriate basis and the same can help in
making
• Decision with help of EMA: Different pricing of products + Re-evaluation of profit margins +
Phasing out certain products + re-designing process/products to reduce environmental costs +
Improving house-keeping and monitoring of environmental performance + Calculation of
NPV/IRR for investment decisions
Techniques to identify environmental costs:
• Input-output analysis: Traces inflows of raw material and outflow of finished products – helps
in measuring wasted material
• Flow cost accounting: Records material flows as well as material losses incurred at various
stages – Material flows are broadly categorized as material, systems and delivery and disposal
– Material cost is RM cost – Systems is in-house handling cost for RM (personnel cost) – Delivery
and disposal cost is cost of material leaving the company (Transportation/disposing waste)
• Life-cycle costing: Measuring life-cycle environmental cost – TQM approach can be used to
reduce costs
• Activity Based Costing: Allocation of environmental costs to products on the basis of
appropriate cost drivers – Objective is to remove environmental costs from general overheads
and allocate on the basis of suitable allocation base [Volume of emission/waste (or) Toxicity of
emission and waste treated (or) relative costs of treating different types of emission]
Controlling Environmental Costs:
• Waste: Mass balance approach can be used to find how much material is wasted in production
– we compare amount of material purchased with product yield – Waste has environmental
costs due to generation of greenhouse gases and loss of land resources
• Water: Identify where water is used and reduce consumption
• Energy: EMA identifies inefficiencies and wasteful practices – helps in energy cost reduction
• Transport and Travel: EMA can help in identification of savings in transport and travel cost
• Consumables and raw material: Directly attributable and discussion with management can
help in reducing them
Other points in relation to EMA:
• Reasons for controlling environmental costs: Reducing carbon footprint + Scope for cost
reduction + Regulatory requirement
Types of Feedback:
• Primary: Reported to line management – control reports comparing actual and budgeted results
– Not reported to anyone higher if the variances are small (or) can be easily corrected
• Secondary: Feedback is sent to higher level in organization – used when there are large variances
– can also lead to variation in standards
• Negative: Feedback taken to reverse a deviation from standard – will lead to amendment of
process
• Positive: Taken to reinforce a deviation – no change in process – can lead to change in standards
Limitations:
• Depends on success of error detection systems + time lag between error detection, error
confirmation and error revision during which actual results may change again
Control Reports:
• Feedback devices – control reports cannot lead to change in performance but a change happens
if managers take action based on the report
Guidelines:
• Disclose both accomplishment and responsibility
• Extracted promptly
• Disclose trends and relationships
• Disclose variation from standards
• Standardized format
Feed-forward Control:
• Forecasting of differences between actual and planned outcomes and implementation of action
before the event to avoid such differences
Approaches on implementation:
• Indicator, both leading and early warning + Contingency Plans + Trend Analysis + Adaptive
mechanism + Congruent system designs + Policy directives
Guidelines on implementation:
• Through planning and analysis + System to be kept dynamic + Data on input variables must
be regularly collected + Requires action
Limitations:
BHARADWAJ INSTITUTE (CHENNAI) 42
Last Day Revision - Theory SCMPE
• Concerned with estimation of uncertain future – problem of uncertainty will limit application
• Study of future is not well developed
Behavioural aspects:
• Contradictory goals of budgeting – Fair evaluation vs motivation
• Manager participation vs non-participation in budget setting – Manager participation can
improve motivation and performance – however risk of budgetary slack
• Unrealistic demanding targets can also adversely impact performance
• Hence budgetary control leads to a conflict between achieving financial control and
communicating organization goals
Effect of the budget difficulty on performance:
• Budget level that motivates the best level of performance may not be achievable – In contrast an
achievable budget may lead to lower level of performance as managers no longer aspire to meet
budget target
• Budget will have motivation effect if accepted by managers
• If budget is not accepted then demanding targets will lead to better results
• Generally demanding targets are seen as more relevant than less difficult targets, but negativity
gets in if targets are too challenging
Participation in budget setting:
Top-down Approach or imposed style approach:
• Budget is centrally prepared with little influence from sub-ordinates – Benefit (quick to prepare)
– Limitations (inaccurate budget and motivation issues)
• Suitability: Where personality characteristics of participation lead to no benefits + participation
will not lead to commitment from sub-ordinates + standard process with clear input-output
relationships + stable environment with large number of homogenous units
Limitations of TCM:
❖ Ignores competition, market growth and customer requirement
❖ Excessive focus on cost reduction
❖ Ignore dynamics of marketing and economics
❖ Limited focus on review and improvisation
❖ Reactive approach
❖ Short-term outlook
Examples:
Preventive maintenance versus break-down maintenance:
A manufacturing company does not carry out preventive maintenance of its machineries on a
regular basis to save costs. Repairs of machinery is carried out as and when a machinery breaks down.
This is a traditional approach to cost management where the focus is on cost reduction and cost
saving. This is a short- term approach to manage costs. When machinery breaks down, the company
loses more in terms of loss of production time and idle labour time. Lack of regular preventive
maintenance and planned shutdown time also reduces the life of the machinery and has a longer-
term impact. If the loss of production is significant, the company might lose market share to its
competitors. Hence, it is important to look at cost management with a strategic focus.
Decision on closure of service Centre:
A telecom company closed down some of its customer service centres as a cost cutting measure.
This led to overcrowding of customers at other centres and longer waiting time for the customers. The
volume of work at other centres increased impacting the performance of employees. Both the
customers and employees, two of the key stakeholders, were not happy with the company’s
decision. This type of business decision can impact the reputation and brand image of the company
and impact the sales and profitability in the longer run.
Cost reduction can be good and bad:
➢ Good cost reduction is one wherein we can reduce costs as well as maintain or improve
quality
➢ Bad cost reduction is one wherein a company cut costs without considering the impact on
employees, customers and overall loyalty
➢ SCM focuses on only good cost reduction whereas TCM can involve both good and bad
cost reduction