Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EMBA-BUS 5070A Business Strategy
EMBA-BUS 5070A Business Strategy
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE OVERVIEW
Description:
This course offers a cross-disciplinary perspective to prepare participants in planning and
executing global strategies. Real-world proven steps, tools and frameworks prepare
course participants to succeed in an increasingly turbulent global environment. The course
integrates international business, inter-cultural management, and global leadership as it
explores implementation of international strategies.
As a starting point, we will revisit the course International Business and the fundamental
questions you covered in that course: Do we have to internationalize to grow profitably?
When is the right time to internationalize? Where and how should we internationalize?
From there, we will continue with key strategic decisions, which top management of large
multinational companies must take: What is our corporate and business level strategy?
How do we organize a global business? Can we benefit from global value chains? How do
we choose among various foreign market entry modes? How do we manage cross-border
acquisitions and alliances? This course takes a different approach from the approach in
your Entrepreneurship course, as it zooms in on issues relevant to established, large
multinational, for-profit organizations rather than smaller entrepreneurial startups. It builds
on your knowledge from the course Organizational Design and Management, where you
examined the link between culture, teams, and organizational designs, and discussed
organizational change.
The primary objective of the simulation is to maximize the shareholders’ value. In this
case, the value to shareholders is measured by cumulative shareholder return, which
takes into consideration both the dividents paid as well as the share price development
over time.
The simulation is completely web based. The management of the simulated company is a
team effort, but the simulation platform allows team members to work independently. Each
team member has her/his own account that enables them to make decisions and
scenarios on their own and later combine the outcomes with the other team members on
the [decision checklist] -page. The platform also includes a communications forum that can
be used to communicate within teams and between all teams in the same market. For this
course, the established 5 working teams will represent 5 competing (rival) US-based
telecommunication companies operating in the same global industry space (universe) over
the period of 10 fiscal years (simulation rounds). All teams have the same starting point.
Detailed instructions about the simulation and respective deadlines will be provided during
the first course session.
The deliverable of the simulation is the PPP for the final team presentations. The PPP
should cover the key strategic decisions made during the simulation game (and the logic
behind these decisions), mistakes, lessons learned and an alternative strategy (if the
simulation can be replayed again). Presentations should be about 20 minutes long; PPP
slides should be sent in advance to the instructor.
Readings:
CESIM case description
CESM decision-making instructions
Readings (optional):
Porter, M.E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business
Review, 86(1), 25-40.
Dobbs, M.E. (2014) Guidelines for applying Porter‘s five forces framework: a set of
industry analysis templates. Competitiveness Review, 24(1), 32-45.
Collis, D.J. & Montgomery, C.A. (2008) Competing on resources. Harvard Business
Review, 86(7-8): 140-150 (10pp)
Farrell, D. (2004) Beyond Offshoring: Assess Your Company's Global Potential.
Harvard Business Review, 82(12): 82-90 (8pp)
Arruñada, B., Vázquez, X.H. (2006). When your contact manufacturer becomes your
competitor. Harvard Business Review, 84(9): 135-144.
Readings (optional):
Eccles, R.G., Lanes, K.L., Wilson, T.C. Are you paying too much for that
acquisition? Harvard Business Review. Jul/Aug1999, 77 (4):136-146.
Business Negotiations Simulation: General Motors & Avto VAZ: Creating a successful
cross-border alliance. Case study „General Motors and AvtoVAZ.
The objective of the simulation is to hone your business and behavioral skills in a complex
industry. The case focuses on the continuing negotiations between two of the world's
largest automobile manufacturers. At the time the case was written (spring 2001), the
events were essentially real-time, as GM and Avto VAZ had yet to formalize their final joint
venture agreement. The case is useful in debating the prospective risks and returns to a
Western multinational entering an emerging marketplace, and the risks and returns to a JV
between a major Russian powerhouse and a Western firm that is highly suspicious of its
Russian capabilities. Instructions about the negotiations will be delivered in class.
The deliverable of this session is a personal report reflecting on the following: initial
negotiations strategy (goals), best alternative to negotiated agreement (BATNA) or a
description of the action the party engaged in negotiations has determined should be taken
if talks fail and no agreement can be reached, performance during the negotiations and
lessons learned (what went well, what went wrong, what could have been done better).
The submission of the individual negotiations report should be done by the end of the
course.
Readings (optional):
Beamish, P.W. & Lupton, N.C. (2009). Managing Joint Ventures. Academy of
Management Perspectives, 23(2): 75-94.
Negotiation tips by Deepak Malhotra: https://youtu.be/VsaxtLqh4h0
Deepak Malhotra is Eli Goldston Professor of Business Administration at Harvard
Business School, focusing on negotiation strategy, trust development, international and
ethnic dispute resolution, and competitive escalation.
Case Assignment (this is a team effort and will be graded as such, according to the
criteria below). Submission deadline by 23:59h on Sunday 21st.
A proper case analysis is relatively short but to the point (2 to 3 pages) and applies
conceptual models (frameworks) to the issues presented in a case. The analysis should be
well organized and well written, and comply with the following format requirements:
• Case analysis must be typed.
• Should not exceed 3 pages.
• Number the pages. In the footer, provide your group’s name and the page
number.
• No cover page.
• Use a size 12 font.
• Single or 1 ½ line spacing are acceptable.
• As in all good business papers, you should impose structure on your case analysis
- divide it into relevant sections. For each section, provide a header (in bold font or
underlined).
• As appropriate, include tables and/or charts. (You may exceed 3 pages if you
include tables as attachments.)
• Cite your sources, either in footnotes or using parenthetical citations, and provide
a reference list at the end of your paper.
• Check your work before handing it in. Avoid grammar and spelling mistakes.
GRADING
Desislava Dikova is the Editor-in-chief of the Journal of East West Business (published by
Taylor Francis), Senior Associate Editor of European Management Review (published by
Wiley) and Senior Editor of the Journal of International Management (published by
Elsevier). Prof. Dikova is widely experienced both in degree-course and executive
education. Besides Vienna, she has taught at CEU Budapest, Hult International Business
School (Shanghai Campus), University of Amsterdam, University of Groningen, Ljubljana
University, IBS Vilnius (Lithuania), Moscow State University (Russia), GSOM St
Petersburg, Ohio State University (USA) and Western Washington University (USA).