SPE 77900 Estimating Pseudopressure Function without Relative Permeability [k,(S,,)] for Two and Three Phase Gas Condensate Systems Jokhio, S.A., Tiab, D/University of Oklahoma, Baladi, S., and A.H. TuniolMUET This paper introduces @ new method of estimating pscudopressure function for gas condensate wells producing lunder two and three phase conditions. The proposed method utilizes pressure transient test data ta get effective Permeability as @ function of pressure and then uses the definitions of two-phase and three-phase pseudopessure function and combines them to get the final pseudopressure for a given pressure value, Relative permeability as function of saturation can also be used, if available, The method is Analogous tothe pseudopressure of Ramey and Hussainy"” and Fevang and Whitson’. The proposed pseudopressure will help to estimate well liquid as well as gas IPR, well test analysis, well deliverability, and reserve estimation for gas condensate reservoits. Finally a wide range of pscudopressure equations for Region-1, Region-2, and Region-3 for two-phase and three-phase gas condensate reservoirs, have been developed. Also, few examples are solved to show the use of the pscudepressure in estimating well performance, Introduction Analyzing wel test data and forecasting production in gas, ‘condensate systems can be very challenging task due to phase changes that oceur with depletion, Ths is further complicated by the retrograde behavior of light hydrocarbons and the development of very low saturation of the liquid condensate that creates @ rim of the liquid around the wellbore, The immobile liquid, until it reaches a mobile saturation, can severely reduce the gas well deliverability, the primary production of such wels. Thus along with the change in physical properties of the fluids, phase change has to be handled mathematically too. 1f the well is produced at BHP well below the P*, the pressure at ‘which liquid condensate is mobile, condensate rim will develop well inside the reservoir. Deliverability loss in stich conditions is mainly due to three reasons: 2) Gas undergoing liquid phase and b) permeability impairment by the liguid. ¢) Gas undergoing in solution in developing liquid. Furthermore, to analyze multiphase systems we neod relative permeability data. Since relative permeability curves are developed on few inch long cores their application to the hundreds of acres of drainage area is not an easy task. Engineers involved in reservoir simulation know that how hard itis to get a good history match and how many times relative permeability curve fms to be tuned to achieve it. Once obtained, does not ‘guarantee the accurate forecasting. In this study we used well testing based effective permeability as a continuous function of pressure. The use of relative permeability curves requires the prior knowledge of the fuid saturation, In this paper we simulated the gas condensate well test using Sapphire well test, analysis software. The pressure data then was used to get effective permeability using oil, gas, and water rate data, Thus an equation for effective permeability asa function of pressure Was obtained and used in developing pseudopressure curves, Literature Review Ramey and Hussainy" first introduced the concept of pseudopressure function that integrates the Huid properties as function of pressure. Raghavan and Jones? discuss the well performance of gas condensate wells, Fevang and Whitson’ modeled the well deliverability of gas-condensate wells, Penuela’, and Gringarten eta." discuss the well test analysis in gas condensate reservoirs, Two-Phase Systems Modeling Liquid Condensate Produetion ‘The main source ofthe liquid condensate production is the Region-1. In two-phase systems (oil and gas), total liquid hydrocarbon production is the some of the liquid condensate production end the vapor content in the gas phase Mathematically, Gor = Go *4p.26eRy a aor=Cm(y ® t{ Kk. soll = f (He ° For via ets eo 8 o ores]2 SSARFRAZ JOKHIO, QJEBBAR TIA, SHAHZAD BALADY, AND ABOUL H. TUNIO see 77800 For horizontal wells 2.00708 Keep Hk c © Bae Jo (Bay + Lacy 0.75 +s] 09) Water Production dy = CAm(p),, (6) % Kkow amp, Ife} o Pradacag Gas ON Rati (Rp AAs the pressure drops below the dew point, producing. {888 ol ratio GOR, increases monotonically", i... @ one-to-one relationship exists between the producing gas oil ratio and the pressure as shown in Fig.6. It dives as the P* approaches and Tiguid becomes mabile. However, it stabilizes as effective liquid permeability stabilizes, By Definition Yer _ Ses to,se Rr “ Gor date Fee Re k «{ss.) Gi} sex |B . ® q On simplification we {Bu Rp aR +{ae | Bote ‘ (i]s uo ay Solving for kyky results, Kay) [e—R,) (Babi 2 Keo I-R, Re] Busts 02) Solving for gas andoil effective permeability, results (Rp —Ry)(HeBe kk w} Wee eee} RRy)( HB leap Producing Oil-Water Ratio (Ryex) To get insight in the production phenomenon, fet us derive the water oil ratio and see how it behaves and what kind of information ean be derived from i. as) ci ma ] as kk, LR Regy = Se a[ SMe) Bette [ORR op] any ae (iin [Bate [RE=R, Solving for water and gas effective permeability respectively: wk [TR yp, [Batts | He as) Buty ) Rrow MRE) 0) TR, ln | 183s important to note that even the producing oil-water ratio. can be detived from the fee gas production and the water production data, Eq.17, The base Muid in gas condensate wells Fs the gas phase, Oil production may be hard to measure dowahole. Therefore every parameter is expressed in terms of {as properties and water properties Producing Gas-Water Ratio (Ry,)(Oll Phase Absent) Similarly Rog a a ‘Where Roy i the solotfon gas-water ratio expressed as SCF /STB, Kkce Buty J ates +90 Rog 20) Reg = en Ww (cs J fH Batts kk Regen Hh Bate Ja @ dw (kw A Bebe Solving for water and gas effective permeability tk ky (2) ey Buy Byte) kk, = ~ Ruy Keke, J (24) 1 2(6e- Raelihn (pee a Above equations indicate that only one phase effective permeability is required to know all other phase effective permeabilities provided their production is known, Modeling Two-Phase Pseudopressure Function for Gas- Condensate Fluids Solution gas cil rato is function of API gravity of condensate, gas specific gravity, the bubble point pressure of the condensate, and reservoir temperature. Most of the gos reservoits produce much over the bubble point pressure of the condensate and free gas gravity and API gravity are constant values, Thus for the reservoir pressure above the bubble point'SPE77900 Estimating Pseudopressure Function Without Relaive Permeablity (Sx) for Two and Three phase Gas Condensate Systems pressure of condensate and well producing at the wellbore Flowing pressure within the test pressure range in the Region- | the oil phase peudopressure (Fg, 3) can be writen as O11 Phase (Regio anol j(He Hay es) D Substituting Eg.14 and 13 in above equation and simplifying resulls pseudopressure function in terms ef more reliable phase, gas phase effective permeability, mina cho en (28) 9) Now substituting Equation 19 in Eq. 25, and simplifying yields pseudopressure function in terms of second rl phase, water phase ke mip), fro(# ye 60) Equations 26, 28 and 30 indicate tha he oi prodacton can also be predicted from water and gas production, Since water phase tes the moe flable phase (water properties aly Change with pessure and temperature), teeters iis nt 1ccestry to express water phase in es oF o phase and pe phase terms E47 Gas Phase Produced gas a the surface is combination of free gas and dissolved gas in oil. The total pseusopressure thus ean be written as” mip), ! (ies oae fo on Region-1 (Inner wellbore rogion) @) Region-2 (Region where fiquid develops) mlP),o9: ies fe 2) Region-3 (Only gas region) 1 saben eff ow (haus al offetz}e ) Tha tl AmPr equa Amt AMP sAmE, Reon! Subsiting £9.14 and 1S in stove equtonrexpesvey result the gas phase pseudopressure funetion in terms of gas and oll effective permeability “h(_kky) Re(l-RoRs), mO)o.1 1 its) Ee Gs) ‘One can write erg = fhe PMynei(P4 G6) Tooker (°) G7) aa = f I Bele “path 68 Simiany O21 = flbeoMersilip 69) oo a + Phase (oil phase absent, pure gas reservoirs with ‘water production) Substituting Eq.23 in Eq.7 and simplifying it results nl. “Sele oO mas ~Tetelt > . Eq. 41 shows how water phase pseudoprecssure can be expressed as a function of gas properties and producing gas water ratio ‘Three-Phase Systems M, 'roducing Gas Oil Ratio (Ry) By definition ‘7 see *4osieeRs + dwRsow Ryo Sets doses +aeRi 2) Sor Goto: * Vp. Ro +4oi0Rs de ua‘ ‘SARFRAZ JOKHIO, DJEBBAR TIAB, GHAHZAD BALADI, AND ABDUL, TUNIO SPE 77900 Kk | mp) = f(s co) ilocos vo Ai rye (it oe 8) a dor -) (ee he Weean writeas Pale 90P),,, = fhkoMes dP Last term on right hand side of above equation is total ae producing water oil rato, Ryn On simplification Moayy {1 J+ RelA =a) 6) on LaeBs J (AR, =I) ay Simplifynig and solving for individual phase effective permeability, yields Ky «5 ae (45) ik Sw. 4 1B, “oo Were AHR RywRegn co) Producing Gas-Water Ratio (Rygy3p) in Region-2 and Region-3 Repent Gal aee us) a a Where Ryze isthe solution gas-water ratio expressed as SCF /STB. Rygy = (49) as Simplifying Roya Botte e+ Rae Ww rw A Bothy (50) Solving for water and gs effective permeability respectively Bully Kk Kh 1 ke ey =| ree Biel A=) oyu, 2 7 ( t rele 4) wo Pseudopressure Function for Three phase Systems, m(p) Substituting Eq.45 and 46 in Eq,3 and simplifying it yields the oil pseudopressure function in terms of gas phase and the oil phase properties. Ol1Phase With Ba. 45 AReg~RoacRgw [Now Substituting Eq, 46 in Eg. 3 gives: ag j (|e Bete We ean writeas 00), = PlaMo re J), 65) Equation 7 also applies for three phase systems. ‘There will be no water vapor phasse inthe gas phase since the saturation temperature, temperature at which vapor phase begins to condence, is very high at high pressure as indicated in Figures 6a and 6b. Row (57) Rey =k (58) =] iit wey hie pedes) = (60) (ee a" Gas Phase Pseudopressure in Region-1 otal gas production in Region-1 in 3-phase mobile system is the sum ofthe free gas, dissolved gas in oil and dissolved gas in water, Mathematically‘SPE77900 Estimating Pseudopressure Function Without Relative Permeability (Ss) for Two and Three phase Gas Condensate Systems "p(B ky Kuk » mp) = (Ge BR He te en Subsittuting Eq, 61 for k:krw term in above equation and then substituting Eq, 46 for kikro tem in resulting equation and yields: } lances) J Where Eq. 63 isthe gas phase pseudopressure in Region-I for theee phase reservoirs. Its a powerful correlation which is only in terms of gas effective permeability and surface produetion terms such as oil water ratio, water oil ratio, Later inthis paper we show how to estimate effective permeability using ‘measured surface gas rate without the prior knowledge of relative permeability term, which then can be used back in Ea, {63 to evaluate the integral. We can write Eq, 63 as follows for convenience: KM dP 6 \ LY Rise RR, soo metas} te ]4] (64s) Gas Water Ratio in Region? and Region-3 ‘Gas water rato in Region 2 ean be modeled as follows: er dame +R Ww we Where Rigy isthe Solution gas-water ratio expressed as SCF ISTE. Re, 5) kk, ( p Bat ae yyy et ote) alt cy We d= Bally Rye = (HE | Balle |g n dy Ukkew J Byte Solving for water and gas effective permeability respectively Khe (Baty a__{ Bale s snoop) i. Key =(Rrge Belle { i] (6) Gas phase Pseudopressure in Region-2 and Region-3 mp), ies Kee ta fo 0) ABs Bae ‘Substituting Eq. 69 for water effective permeability term, results: bbe {ie Lettie an For convenience, one can write aes fest o L Equations 71 and 73 are equally applicable for Region-3 for a three-phase reservoir where only water and gas are mobile but ‘with opper and lower pressure limits of R and Ry on the integral, respectively. ay Effective Permeability as a Function of Pressure: ssure response during a drawdown testis written as: jae ntacsal of : pom -oms| One ry ‘According to Darcy law the flow arte of any phase towards the ‘wellbore 1s the function of the preesue. But presse is function ofthe distance from the wellore anoint 2) way For fp/r’ 2 90 pressure is Function of Boltzman variable: Tous one ean write oP ‘aP a ap. oP 1133 a Ee Fine “a Subsitatng above equation ina Darcy law, one gets "of 22 kon Yay rior 2B V9 Pa oy Qo = L127 x10 | re Pas) wy Solving fr effective permeability resus Wk gy = Gotta (Hs) if 2 ain(t) Foro phase We, 70-54, ws) Wat tac [And for eas phate ky 70S, fe (H-7) 300 or zt Bin)® ‘SARFRAZ JOKHIO, DJEBBAR TIAB, SHAHZAD BALADI, AND ABDUL H, TUNIO ilar for pressure buildup 2. 64eH Bs (8) m, | as ain, (9) at he Above equations are valid fora fully developed radial regime that appears for p/p” 2 50-Thus itis possible from a transient well pressure data to develop the relative perme provided absolute formation permeability is known, ity curves Effective Permeability Estimation Using Measured Surface Rate from Well Test Analysis in Two Phase Systems In phase changing multiphase environment such as as condensate systems, itis hard to measure the free rate at surface. The total rate is the combination of the free oil and gas flow and dissolved gas in oil and vapor phase in the gas phase. Thus a scheme is devised to get effective permeability using the surface measured rate from well test analysis instead of free rate. Pressure transient response in terms of Dseudopessice can be represented as log(t +1 a} blpcm~mp)y, = 16264 eae He 322754086868 ty Gas phase preuoprsste for Region hasbeen defines by 35 and 38. Bq M1 wih cqution Scan be expresed a . 5) logt) +10 JclP)M 2g Pde = 162, (s “ (et fot 3.2275 +0,86868, On) ‘Taking derivative of above equation with respect to pressure 4 apy" eg(P) \dk, raain-r0f e|8h) (oot ee ow) Eq, M3 provides gas phase effective permeability as function ‘of pressure from well test analysis in Region-! in gas- condensate reservoirs Now with Eg. 39, Eq, Ml can be similaely re-written as follows: MaralP)= od Wie ra aa keg P) (May Fg. Mé provides oil effective permeability as function of pressure with gas phase well test analysis, ‘SPE'77500 Rate from Well Test Analysis in Three Phase Systems Similarly nid -iph iea S oat + ofS). 3.2275 +0.86868 (Ms) Oil phase pseudopressure for Region-1 has been defines by 1Bq.53 and 55, Equation MS, with equation 60 can be written asfollows: lott) +1og{ Set) froma? = 162 { ae (22) M6) 3.2275 + 0.86868 ‘Taking derivative of above equation with respect to pressure and rearranging, yields: Semen Yt at 2 )dkeo fie |b (on ony Moss Or one can write as follows: cro fuses Y, a eo rand ie | =)’ [rors es os) ‘Above equation provides th ol pase effete prmstty ts tinction of rue om pes n, Susiing Ea, 8 in MS. and smpting sity esas: = 70.6f fom 1 2P) (ee |) Eg. M9 provides gas effective permeat pressure Moral kkatieit | OP 9) ity asa finetion of, ( 0.434 keg Summary of Pseudopressure Models ‘Two Phase Systems Ry) R is rm ta} “ Region-1 en Oil Phase ap lag = (ee (' i, ambaa = iene gos Gas Phase mba =| J day) Seo 65) na if Hala file 09‘SPE77900 Estimating Pseudopressure Function Without Relative Permeabilty k(S.) for Two and Three phase Gas Condensate Systems Water Phase Conclasons ae 1. Condensate reservoirs are usually analyzed using Amb), I ma o ‘compositional simulation techniques. In this method ete pscudopressure is calculated and solved analytically. 2 This method uses the pressure transient data to estimate Region-2: Gas Phase effective permeability as a function of the pressure and - then uses i to estimate pseudapressure function, thereby mba ip 33) eliminating the relative permeability as @ function of Be Baty ‘saturation completely, Region-3: Gas Phase 3. A wide range” of pseudopressure mathematical models : hhave been develope which ean be applied to a varety of mfp pag # Beg Sud ii ft 34 seservoir pressure conditions such as above and below the Th * 4. The method is simple, analytical and is analogous to ‘Three Phase Sustems conventional techniques of analysis. Region-1: OM Phase wommvention via RAA-R, dh B, = Oil FVF,RB/STB mP)esor= f | Ae ]r+ BAB gp 63) EVE CFISCF Jr (R=1) Ce Be Stide Facer horizontal wel R ky =Oilrelative permesbiiy Rape Ky =Gasrvative perme TS Length ot pron el m0), = + ARN yp 6) Gy Gas Flow Rate cD ~ (a-R,) & Solution GOR, SCF/STB Ripe = Solution Gas water ati SCPISTB as Phase Re” = aducing GOR, SCO'STB (4d) a } Rige = Producing Gas water ao, SCHSTB . 2 4R, REL = Producing ol water ato, TBST kek JLA= pow s skin mse lanes Se = Skin fctor deo partial penetration fl Bats J RoR), smb =mip)pseudo-pressise function, pia ep R Hy =Oilwcositysep “ My Gas viscosity, cp ‘Water Phase Subscripts 5 a Dewpoint snioh = {f=} rrr Hel Bot ° oil Region P= Relatve Gas Phase "p-tane= Single phase om ransint test % 1 = Region sl mn 2 = Region-2 faa } o 3 Region-3 “ e2gl Gas in Ragion-I using gas effective permeability in Region-3: Ga ‘2-phase systems: Ff kekye YR. 201 = Gas in Ragion-I using ol effective permeability in ribo = (= FB — in phe systems PL Bette | Reve” Regu 82,wl = Gas in Ragion-I using water effective permeability, Use same Ba, 7 for water phase in Region? and Region 3 in 2-phase systems IPR Model Used in This Study 021 = Oilin Region using gas effective permeability in ‘Rawlins and Shelihardt’? equation now can be used to 2-phase systems establish oi and water phase IPRs, Mathematically 0201 = Oil in Ragin-1 using oil effective permeability in 4 wy 2ephase systems o2,w1 = Oil in Ragion-| using water effective permeability Ww (2) in 2-phase systems L w2gl_ = Water in Ragion-1 using gas effective permeability a » in 2-phase systems W2ol = Water in Ragion-1 using ol effective permeability in2-phase systems ‘W201 = Water in Ragion-1 using water effective permeability in 2-phase systemse ‘SARFRAZ JOKHIO, DUESBAR TIAB, SHAHZAD BALADI, AND ABOUL H. TUNIO 23.g1 = Gas in Ragion-1 using gas effective permeability in Sephase systems 23,01 = Gas in Ragion-I using ol effective permeability in Sephase systems 3,w1 = Gas in Ragion-t using water effective permeability in 3ephase systems ©3g1 = Olin Ragion-1 using gas effective permeability in B.phase systems Rol = Oilin Ragion-I using oil effective permeability in S-phase systems 03.1 = Oil in Ragion-l using water effective permeability in 3-phase systems w3gl = Water in Ragion-1 using gas effective permeability in S-phase systems 3,01 = Water in Ragion-1 using oll effective permeability in-phase systems w3,w1 = Water in Ragion-1 using water effective permeability in 3-phase systems References 1 Fetkovich, M.D, Guerer, E., Fetkovich, M.1, and Thomas, LX: “Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilties Determined from Rate-Time Performance Dat,” paper SPE 15831 presented at the 1986 SPE Anmual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Oct 58 2 Raghavan, R., Jones, LR: “Depletion Performance of Gi Condensate Reservoite, JPT Aug, 1996 3. Fevang, O. and Whitson, CiH. "Modeling Gas-Condensate Aeliverbilty,"Paper SPE 30714 presented at the 1995 SPE ‘Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Oct, 22- 2s. 4. Gopal, V.N= “Gas Z-Factor Equations Developed For Computer.” Oil and Gas Journal (Aug. 8, 1977) 58-60, 5. Sere, K.V., Peres, MM, and Reynolds, A.C: "Wel-Test Analysis for Solution Gas Dave Pare Determination of Relative and Absolute Permeabilies” SPEFE. June 1990, P-124131 (6. Penuela, G. and Civan, F:“Gas-Condensate Well Test Analysis ‘With and Without Relative Permeability Curves", SPE 63160, 7. Economides Meal. “The Stimulation ofa Tight, Veryctligh= Temperature Gas Condensate Well” SPEFE March i989, 63-72, 8 Guehria, FM. “Inflow Performance Relationships for Gas- Condensates", SPE 63158 9. Rawlins, BL and Shellhatdt, M.A.: “Backpressure Dats on Natural Gas” Wells and Theit Application #0 Production Practices”, USBM (1935). 10, Geto, G.D., Paone, F and Villa, M:“Relibilty analysis on PVT Correlations, Paper SPE 28904, 11, Gringarten, AC. etal: "Well Test Analysis in Gas Condensate Reservoirs", SPE 62920, Presented at ATCE Dallas, October | 4, 2000, 12. Al-Hussiny, Rand Ramey, LJ, Je: Applicaton OF Real Gas Flow Theory To Well Testing And Deliverability Forecarting, IPT (May 196), 637. Fig. |, Three regions idealized with vertical wel. ‘SPE 7900, Fig.2. Oil effective permeability asa function of pressure with segregated rate (vertical wel), Fig.3. Gas Effective Permeability as function of pressure with segregated rate Fig.4. Effect of condensate flow rate on effective oil permeability (Pa = 5000 psi) Fig 5. Effect of gas flow rate on effective gas permeability (Pd = 5000 psi)'SPE77900 Estimating Psoudopressure Function Without Relative Permeability k(Ss) for Two and Three phase Gas Condensate seam sun-nd sz) ‘temperatures, Steam Tables”. integrals for oil using Eq. 26, or 28 for 2-phase and “| use Eq. 7 ‘temperatures, Steam Tables. simulator, F | ae] a 20°F [035 ™ ‘om fe Fig.7. Transient Pressure semi-log plot. Procedure 1. Having ealeulated By, By. Hoy gy Re and R, caleulate Mag. and Mo.o using Eq.27 and 29 for 2-phase and 37 and 40 for 3-phase. For, use following correlation a2sis We 2. Having calculated the Mog. Myo terms, calculate the group (pra) using following equation: AP Ani) [STA FIN), 11.66 +4.706310°° R,+1.623,/R, Peon eo Fig.8 Gas effective permeability as function of pressure. 3. Plot Mug Vs (tdP/dt)" on a Cartesian graph. From the point where wellbore storage and skin effects are lover, calculate the derivative of the curve as follows (¥2-y1)(4¢-%4) and convert it into absolute value it necessaryw SSARFRAZ JOKHIO, EBBAR TIAB, SHAHZAD BALADI, AND ABDUL H. TUNIO a Preseere es] effective permeability a function of pressure, curve snp Fig.10. Oil phase pseudopressure using gas effective permeability. [E9.26] Fig.11. il phase IPR against pressure with pseudoprerssure using Eq, 26. [n =0.8 ¢ = 0.0001 Assumed values) SS Fig.1 a. Gas phase IPR. SPE77900, Example-2: Three-Phase Vertical Well ‘This example was simulated with reservoir pressure just above the dew point prossure to simulate the Region, Region,2 and Region-3 together. But the pressure did not drop. far below to see all the throe regions altogether. The lowest pressure is 3500 psi, But the initial data is masked by the wellbore storage effects, Region-1, Py < Par= 4800 psi, is wel developed. After 100 hours we ate in radial portion and in the Region-I. Thus using same procedure as in example 1, well performance is established. ‘Well and Fluid Data for Example-2 Pi 5,000 Psi h Looe GWR 10,000CFSTBc 0.2 STBIPsi war 100 STBIMMsef 3 8G 07 kh 100 md-t Py 5,000 psi k tnd 1, 1,000 hrs 4 I MMetD G 3.008-06 Psi! 4 100 StB/D T 250F w 100 STBID Gor 20,000cf/STB APL 0 fe 035 Fe fit i Fig [2 Semi-og plot of pressure test indicating start of semi- log straight line. Kg ima) Prossure[psia} Fig. 13. Gas phase effective permeability Integral. Example2)‘SPE77900 Estimating Pseudopressure Function Without Relative Permeability k(Sx) for Two and Thtee phase Gas Condensate Systems fam i i. Fig 14. Oil effective permeability a «function of pressure Conte Feats 80 Fig.18, Condensate IPR ee | i os | : i Tors | - 7 f= ase: an i os i 03s Jou a ee . \ Pressure Fig. 15. Water effective permeability as a funtion of pressure ren i " Fig. 19, Water phase IPR. gan ; Jo a ow at Fig. 20 Gas Phase IPR, with m(p) using Eq 63. Fig.16. PVT data for example-2. Fig. 17. Water phase pseudopressureP sla 4107,709 4112585 4117.985 4122417 412678 4131378 4135.913, 440.387 4144.808 4149.165 4183.892 4159.119 4164.004 4171.287 4178.323 4186.081 4196.523 4203.785 4213.887 426.915 4236.872 4249.78 4263.682 4278.632 4298,574 431.489 4329.395 4348189 4387.77 4388.102 4408.956 SSARFRAZ JOKHIO, DJEBBAR TIAB, SHAHZAD BALADI, AND ABDUL H, TUNIO Be bolistb 1.836879 1.837855, 1.839013, 1.840156, t.a4i282 942302 1943488 1.944569 1.845697 1.846692 1.847836 1.849101 1.8505, 1.952048 1.889754 1.885629 11857685 1.859934 1.962369 1.885072 1.867983, seria 7452 1.978171 1.882068, 1.886209 1.830599 1.895212 1.900028 1.90503 a910172 Table PVT data for Exampl Hs sp 0.184726 0.154585 0.184447 0.15311 o.sa177 0.184045 0.183916 0.183788 0.183863 0.153539 0.183405 0.183287 0.153094 0.152914 0.152716 0.1525 0.182268 0.182007 0.151727 0.151426 0.151097 0.150745 0.150368 9.149966 0.149541 0.149092 0.148621 0.14813 0.147628 047102 0.146572 B, bbisef 0.000717 0.000716 0.000716 0.000715 0.000715 o.000714 0.000714 0.000713 0.000713 0.000713 o.000712 0.000712 0.000711 0.00071 0.00071 0.000709 0.000708 0.000707 0.000706 0.000708 0.000704 0.000703 0.000701 0.0007 6.00088 0.000687 0.000695 0.000693 o.c00692 0.00069 0.000888 & 0023184 0.023208 0.023224 ooz3244 0.023264 029269 0.023302 oo2asa1 0.02334 0.023960 0028978 029401 0.023828 0.023482 0.020482 0.073518 0.023862 0.023591 0.023695 0.073683 0.023794 o02a70 0.023851 oo2ae16 0.023967 024061 oo2etsi o.2ez2e oo2ea12 0.02480 0.028498 Ry soft 1430.138 1432097 1434.025, 1435926 waar 1439.688, saatart 1443.27 145.046, 1446.8 1488,701 1450,004 1453.128 1455,701 1458,534 1461.608 1485.059 1468.791 1472863, sarr3it 482.135, 1487.347 1492.958 1498.998, 105.442 112.284 4519531 127.142 1535.078 1543324 1851.787 R, bbilset 6,245.05 6.256-05 6,266.05 6276-05 6.286-05 6286-05 6296-05 6.30E-05, 6316-05, 6326-05 6.336-05, 6346-05, 6,356.05, 6376-05 6,386.05 6406-05 6426-05 6436-05 6465-05 6485-05 6,506.05 6536-05, 6.58E-05 6,595.05 6.63605, 6.665-05, 6.7E-05 6.746-05, 6795-05 6836-05 6.885-05 M, @-phase) 6.817752 eaters 6.814634 6.813088 6.811552 6.810023 6.208502 6.06991 6.805486 6.803988 6.002852 6.200528 6.798491 6.796218 6.793678 6.79086 6.787728 6.784255 6.780808 6.76137 6.771426 6.76628 6.760551 6.754302 6.747408 6.740105 6.732101 6.7235 6.71432 6.704553 6.69429 SPETT9NO