Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethics Yearly 2023 Vision
Ethics Yearly 2023 Vision
ETHICS
9.1. ETHICS OF INFLUENCER ENDORSEMENTS
Introduction
The Centre has released the endorsement guidelines
for celebrities and social media influencers titled as
the “Endorsements Know-hows!”. These guidelines
have been issued under the overall ambit of Consumer
Protection Act 2019.
What are Celebrity Endorsements?
Endorsements are a form of advertising that uses
famous personality or celebrities or social media
influencers who command high degree of recognition,
trust, respect or awareness among the people.
Endorsement by celebrities or influencers have a
greater capability to persuade buyers as they are
viewed as role models in a society.
What are the prevalent ethical issues in influencer
endorsements?
• Instances of misuse of Trust: Followers are bound
in a strong manner with the influencer. They trust
that influencers would not recommend something
that is harmful, or low quality. However, this is not
the case with brand marketing by such influencers.
• High influence but less responsibility: Influencers
have higher ability to persuade consumers.
However, there is no responsibility mechanism for
checking the endorsed products.
• Difficult to distinguish commercial messaging: Perspective of influencers
Promotion by influencers often do not look like • Unreasonable expectation of detailed due diligence:
commercials but rather as general advices. Celebrities are often blamed for not performing due
o Advertisements are posted without any such diligence on brands they endorse. This expectation of due
disclosure and are difficult to identify. diligence is often open-ended and unreasonable.
• Lack of understanding of nature or quality of o Also, appropriate data for such due diligence may not
product by influencers: Sometimes, influencers be in public domain.
• Brand responsibility: Influencer groups have argued that
themselves have limited idea of the quality of
Brands should be made equally responsible for framing a
product they are promoting. This was evident in Fyre
misleading advertisement in the first place.
festival fraud. • Moral boundaries, in the case of products like carbonated
• Conflict of interest and deceptive marketing: Often beverages and fairness creams, should be drawn by the
the products are advertised showing that they have individual celebrity himself/herself.
been made keeping the benefits of consumer in o For instance, P. Gopichand decided not to endorse
mind but are actually promoted based solely on carbonated soft drinks owing to their deleterious
profit motive. health effects.
• Targeting of vulnerable groups such as children or • Influencers reputation and credibility is at stake in a
teenagers, that may not be able to critically evaluate brand’s endorsement. So, they themselves are often
mindful about endorsement decisions as their name is
the products that influencers are promoting.
associated with the brand image for a long time.
Conditions in which war can be justified Ethics to be adhered while engaging in war
• Legitimate Authority: The war is fought by an entity that has • Differentiation: Both sides must differentiate between
the authority to fight such wars. combatants and non-combatants.
• Right Intention: Entity intends to achieve the just cause, rather • Proportionality of Force: The extent of the attacks must
than using it as an excuse to achieve some wrongful end. not supersede the intended purposes, which must be
• Reasonable Prospects of Success: The war is sufficiently likely non-other than concluding the war.
to achieve its aims. • Situation requires military intervention: The act must
• Proportionality: The morally weighted ‘Good’ achieved by the have a reasonable military justification.
war outweigh the morally weighted ‘Bad’ that it will cause. • Follow Geneva Convention of Prisoners of War (PoW):
• Last Resort (Necessity): There is no other less harmful way to If there are any prisoners of war, combatant and civilian
achieve the just cause. alike, must be treated with fairness.
Conclusion
“So long as there are men, there will be wars.”
– Albert Einstein
On the long enough timeline, war among nations, regions or people may be an inevitability. But the associated death and
destruction can be mitigated if wars are looked from the lens of reason and humanity.
“Not every war is worth fighting….”
– Naushad
Stakeholders Interests
Governments • Interests in national security, law enforcement, and public administration. They also want to
foster innovation and economic growth in the AI sector.
Users of AI (citizens) • Concerned with ensuring that AI technologies are used in ways that respect fundamental rights,
such as privacy, freedom of expression, and protection from discrimination.
Civil Society and Activists • To raise awareness of human rights issues and to hold governments and corporations
accountable for any violations.
AI Developers and • Aim to advance their field, solve complex problems, and may be concerned with issues like
Engineers algorithmic bias and fairness.
International • International bodies, such as the United Nations, have interests in global peace, security, and
Organizations development.
Does AI harm human rights?
While AI itself is a tool and does not inherently possess the intention to harm, its
applications and implementations have raised concerns in the recent past in the
following ways:
• Right to privacy: Big-data surveillance systems aggregate and analyze
massive amounts of personal data, inferring people’s most sensitive
information.
• Free expression: Automated systems are deployed to censor political, social,
and religious speech.
o AI surveillance can incentivize people to avoid reprisal through self-censorship.
• Access to information: Platform algorithms have promoted incendiary content over reliable information.
o Pro-government commentators can use generative AI to create disinformation at scale.
• Due process: AI-enabled surveillance tools, such as social media monitoring, forgo standards like “probable cause,”
treating everyone as a possible wrongdoer.
• Discrimination: Algorithmic systems can perpetuate bias built into their training data and exacerbate long-standing
discrimination.
• Association and assembly: AI systems with abilities like facial recognition can identify and track potential protesters,
allowing state forces to arrest and retaliate against them.
• Digital election interference: Harnessing AI to augment disinformation campaigns, creating deep fakes to sow doubt,
discredit opponents, and manufacture public support etc.
113 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
Does AI strengthen Human rights?
While there are challenges and risks associated with AI, there are also significant opportunities for promoting and
upholding human rights.
• Right to equality: AI algorithms can be designed to reduce biases in decision-making processes.
o By eliminating or minimizing bias in areas like hiring, lending, and criminal justice, AI can help ensure that
individuals are treated more equally and fairly.
• Privacy Protection: AI technologies can be used to develop advanced privacy protection mechanisms, including
secure data encryption, identity protection, and secure communication, which are essential for safeguarding
individuals' freedoms.
• Ensuring Accountability: AI-powered surveillance technology can be used to hold governments and institutions
accountable.
o For example, facial recognition technology can be used to document and expose police brutality, ensuring
transparency and accountability.
• Protecting collective rights by enabling Governance: For example-
o Predictive Policing: AI can help law enforcement agencies allocate
resources more effectively, proactive crime prevention, and
objective decision-making.
✓ Although, there are concerns about the misuse of predictive
policing when used unethically.
o Governance and early warning systems: AI can be used to develop
early warning systems for natural disasters and humanitarian crises.
Way ahead
• Defend information integrity in the age of AI: Regulations covering AI should embed human rights principles of
legality, necessity, and
proportionality.
• Assessing societal impact: Ethical
and societal impacts of AI should
be actively considered
throughout the development
process.
o A framework for Social
Impact Assessment (SIA) can
be developed (similar to what
is done for the development
projects).
• Public and Stakeholder
Involvement: Engage in open and
inclusive dialogue with the public,
stakeholders, and experts to
ensure that AI technologies
respect and incorporate human
rights.
• Global Collaboration: Encourage international collaboration and agreements to establish common standards and best
practices for AI ethics and human rights.
• Ethical Guidelines and Regulations: Develop and adhere to ethical guidelines for AI development and deployment on
the lines of Asilomar principles.
Balancing the interests of stakeholders can be challenging, but it's essential to create a framework that ensures AI
technologies are developed and deployed in ways that protect and promote human rights.
Significance of Nudges
• Promote law and order: “Nudge Units” within government agencies have proven that simple nudges can reduce law
violations without using heavy-handed penalties.
• More effective: When applied thoughtfully, nudges can be more effective than mandates, financial incentives, or
awareness campaigns alone.
• Freedom of choice: Unlike traditional interventions that impose restrictions or regulations, nudges maintain
individuals' freedom of choice.
• Cost-effective: Implementing nudges can be relatively simple, and low-cost interventions compared to more
traditional approaches.
• Evidence-based: Nudges are often arrived at after empirical research and evidence, lending them significant
credibility and legitimacy.
• Diversity: Nudges can be tailored to accommodate diverse preferences, values, and cultural contexts, allowing for the
customization of interventions.
Key ethical concerns with nudge
Key ethical concerns with nudges are often seen with respect to the ‘goals of the nudger’, ‘autonomy of the nudged’,
and ‘effects of nudges’.
116 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
• Goals of the nudger: Nudges can be used by many different actors such as individuals, governments, supermarkets
or other corporations. The potential impact of nudges depends upon the nudgers’ motives and who benefits from the
nudge.
• Autonomy of the
nudged: Ethical
concerns
concerning
autonomy largely
deals with:
o Behavioural
exploitation:
Nudges work
with human
shortcomings, especially uncertainty, inaction, and impatience; thus, nudging may exploit people’s irrationality.
For instance, auto-enrolment in savings schemes takes advantage of an individual’s inaction.
o Lack of transparency: Concerns of manipulation and lack of transparency are raised with nudges operating on a
subconscious level.
• Effects of nudges: Effects of nudges may relate to two aspects: Nudge effectiveness (the strength of their impact) and
unintended effects.
o Effectiveness: A nudge does not stimulate reflection and so is less unlikely to create the knowledge, dissonance,
or evaluation required to change people’s beliefs, attitudes and behaviour in the long term.
o Unintended effects: In some cases, a nudge may produce reactance (negative reaction due to perception of
choice restriction) or boomerang effect (reversal from follow-up of intended outcome).
What should be the nature of ethical nudging?
• Transparency: Nudges should be transparent, not covert or hidden and in the interests of the people who are being
nudged and consistent with their values.
• Autonomy: The formation and expression of preferences is an important aspect of individual autonomy and the
nudger should consider preferences when setting the goals of a nudging campaign.
o For example, economically underprivileged groups may benefit from nudges that help them avoid unnecessary
bank fees or high-interest loans more than those designed to increase savings.
• Beneficence: Goal should be to have a positive impact on individuals and society and promote better decision making.
o Nudging should not exploit individuals' vulnerabilities, such as cognitive limitations, emotional states, or
socioeconomic factors.
• Sensitivity and consent: Nudges should be culturally sensitive and
consider the diversity of values, norms, and beliefs within a population.
o Individuals should have the option to opt out of nudges.
Conclusion
The ethics of nudging demands a delicate balance between influencing
behaviour for the greater good and respecting individual autonomy. Effective
and ethical nudging should prioritize transparency, beneficence, and fairness
while avoiding exploitation and safeguarding privacy.
Check your ethical aptitude
A school in New Delhi implements an incentive program for promoting the value of education in the students. Such incentive
program awards the students achieving top ranks in specially designed tests of all the subjects, which are conducted on monthly
basis. Some students who are very good in some subjects find it disincentivising as they cannot perform very good in overall
subjects. This resulted in them losing interest in studies.
On the basis of case, answer the following questions:
• What are the ethical concerns associated with such incentive mechanisms?
• What factors determine that a program designed to bring behavioural changes produce intended outcomes?
• What can be a more effective intervention for promotion of education in schools?
117 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
9.3. INDIVIDUAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (ISR)
Introduction
According to the EdelGive Hurun India Philanthropy List 2023, 119
Indian business tycoons donated Rs 5 crore or more in FY23, together
contributing Rs 8,445 crore for philanthropic activities. This
highlights the role Social Responsibility can play in society.
What is Individual Social Responsibility?
• Social responsibility is a moral framework where organizations
and individuals strive to act for the greater good and avoid
causing harm to society and the environment.
• Triple bottom line: This tenet of social responsibility
encompasses “people, planet, and profit”. This is the belief that
achieving profit does not require harm to the planet or the
exploitation of people.
• Individual Social Responsibility (ISR) refers to the ethical
obligations and actions that individuals have towards their
community and society as a whole.
o ISR involves an individual being aware of how personal actions influence the community.
How ISR is different from Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?
Nature of Individual Social Responsibility (ISR) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Difference
Scale and Scope Individual decisions and voluntary contributions. Corporate entities, Businesses and Large firms. E.g.,
E.g., Philanthropic contributions. Bottles for change campaign of Bisleri.
Nature of Often small and more personal such as Typically, larger in scale and include philanthropy,
Contributions volunteering, charitable giving, advocacy for social environmental sustainability programs, ethical business
justice etc. practices, community development etc.
Drivers Typically, voluntary and driven by personal values Often due to legal requirements, but also driven by
and a sense of moral obligation. ethical considerations and public relations.
Public Not always be publicly communicated and are often Companies often communicate their CSR initiative
Knowledge a private and personal commitment. through various media and annual reports.
Need for ISR in India
• Predominance of Public Sector: The public sector has been carrying
the weight of social sector spending in India, accounting for 95% of
total spending.
• Funding gap in Sustainable Development: India remains well short of
NITI Aayog’s estimate (13% of GDP) of total annual funding required
to achieve United Nations SDGs by 2030.
• Resource redistribution: Despite strong economic growth, multi-
dimensional inequalities persist in India which require a considerable
amount of investment and efforts for resource redistribution.
• Environmental sustainability: ISR practices, such as sustainable
living, waste reduction, and conservation efforts, can contribute to
environmental sustainability and mitigate the impact of climate
change.
• Technology development: ISR can be tapped for enhancing the role
of technology, bridging the digital divide and promoting financial
inclusion.
Ethical Considerations when engaging in ISR
• Freedom of Choice: ISR activities should be designed with the choice autonomy of beneficiaries in mind.
118 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS
• Cultural Sensitivity: ISR activities should understand the cultural context and collaborate with local communities for
respectful engagement.
• Social interest vs personal interest: Individuals are guided by their personal choices and values which may not always
be aligned with every group of people.
o Individuals in their ISR activities should understand the group composition and interests for whom the activity is
designed.
• Outcome-oriented: Individuals should strive to assess the impact of
their contributions, adapting and refining their approaches to
maximize positive outcomes.
• Empowerment: Ethical ISR involves empowering communities to be
self-reliant and fostering sustainable solutions rather than
perpetuating a cycle of dependency.
Conclusion
ISR represents a powerful force for positive change in the communities and
society at large. Embracing ethical ISR involves a conscientious
commitment to making choices that contribute to the well-being of society, the environment, and future generations.
Check your ethical aptitude
Prerna, an entrepreneur, supports a local NGO that provides education and healthcare services to underprivileged children. The
support by the NGO is vital for survival and development of the underprivileged community. However, the NGO is facing allegations
of mismanagement and misuse of funds. News articles and reports suggest that only a small portion of the donations is reaching
the intended beneficiaries, while a significant amount is being spent on administrative expenses and lavish events.
On the basis of case, answer the following questions:
• What are the ethical dilemmas that Prerna faces?
• What can be the course of action for Prerna in this situation?