Are you struggling with the daunting task of writing a dissertation? You're not alone.

Crafting a
dissertation is one of the most challenging academic endeavors one can undertake. It requires
extensive research, critical analysis, and meticulous attention to detail. From formulating a research
question to conducting comprehensive literature reviews, collecting and analyzing data, and
presenting coherent arguments, every step demands unwavering dedication and expertise.

Navigating through the complexities of dissertation writing can be overwhelming, especially when
balancing it with other academic, professional, and personal commitments. Many students find
themselves grappling with tight deadlines, writer's block, and the pressure to produce original, high-
quality work.

That's where ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ comes in. We understand the challenges students face when
tackling their dissertations, and we're here to lighten the load. Our team of experienced academic
writers specializes in providing tailored dissertation assistance to help you overcome obstacles and
achieve academic success.

By entrusting your dissertation to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can:

1. Save Time: Our experts will handle the research, writing, and formatting, allowing you to
focus on other priorities.
2. Ensure Quality: We guarantee well-researched, meticulously written dissertations that meet
the highest academic standards.
3. Beat Deadlines: No matter how tight your deadline, we'll deliver your dissertation on time,
every time.
4. Receive Support: Our dedicated support team is available 24/7 to address any concerns or
queries you may have.

Don't let the stress of dissertation writing hold you back. Order from ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ today
and take the first step towards academic success.
The conclusion, on the other hand, is generally brief and provides just the main points of your
dissertation; i.e. the take-home message. Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection BTKi in Treatment Of Chronic
Lymphocytic Leukemia BTKi in Treatment Of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Faheema Hasan
Recently uploaded ( 20 ) 2023 MAP Data Analysis - St. It includes material which does not belong
to the results section such as interpretation and discussion; Source: images.nap.edu Few possible
exceptions are when the result incorporate previous result, or result from different research that
indispensable to own result, or part of he result has if the target journal author guide combine result
and discussion section, put the citations in the discussion for each result. Argument about the
implications of your findings for. First, it is extremely important to start with an outline of the main
points that you want to make, organized in the order that you want to make them. For example, if
your scientific research has a number of hypotheses and the results are consistent with the
hypotheses i do not see why separate the two sections in my limited experience, it makes sense to
separate results and discussion, in order to avoid an unnecessary repetition of results. As the
discussion is the section in a research paper where you need to critically think about the problem and
provide a unique solution for the same. Few possible exceptions are when the result incorporate
previous result, or result from different research that indispensable to own result, or part of he result
has if the target journal author guide combine result and discussion section, put the citations in the
discussion for each result. If possible, you’ll want to give yourself two or three paragraphs to give
the reader a comprehensive understanding of your study as a whole. Many presenters immediately
offer to describe their research to visitors and use the poster as a visual aid. These are called final
manuscripts A manuscript (such as a dissertation, thesis, or student paper) prepared in its final form
that will not be submitted for publication in a professional journal. Highlighting these implications
while not overstating the findings can be challenging, especially when you’re submitting to a journal
that selects articles based on novelty or potential impact. This makes it easier for multiple people to
read at the same time without bumping into each other. Third, the word and (rather than an
ampersand) is used to join the authors’ names. For example, patients with schizophrenia is better than
schizophrenics. The discussion should show how your findings fit with existing knowledge, what
new insights they contribute, and what consequences they have for theory or practice. The examples
are based on our research on HIV positive people, adolescent health and infertility issues. Don’t just
repeat all the data you have already reported—aim for a clear statement of the overall result that
directly answers your main research question. Academic Marker has three centres of teaching
excellence that support and supplement our e-learning pathways, offering private and group services
to suit all educational budgets. We want to keep things simple and provide support if your systems
experience any of these disruptions. Occasionally, the results and discussion will be combined into
one chapter. The body of an original research article is typically divided into the introduction,
methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. First, be sensitive to labels by avoiding terms that
are offensive or have negative connotations. Only the first word of the article title is capitalized. It is
also one of the most difficult parts to write, and sometimes the longest. I Need Research Paper
Writing Assistance My Research Topics is provides assistance since 2004 to Research Students
Globally. For example, the title and author information, the abstract, and the beginning of the
introduction generally appear on the same page rather than on separate pages. It is impossible to do
research without having a problem, which is required to be resolved, or a question, which needs to
be answered but it is difficult for scholars to select and write topic, statement of purpose and thesis,
so the solutions of these are given in this article. To help, this guide provides questions to ask
yourself, a basic structure to model your discussion off of and examples from published manuscripts.
Writing the results and discussion section could be one of the difficulties that you encounter when
writing your first research manuscript.
Making grand statements about how a study will fully resolve large questions can lead readers to
doubt the success of the research. This includes terms that identify people with a disorder or other
problem they happen to have. At larger conferences, talks are typically grouped into sessions lasting
an hour or two in which all the talks are on the same general topic. This works well when there are
complicated materials to describe. Although you do not have to provide a definitive explanation or
detailed theory for your results, you at least need to outline one or more possible explanations.
Writing the results and discussion as separate sections allows you to focus first on what results you
obtained and set out clearly what happened in your if you are unsure whether to include certain
results, go back to your research questions and decide whether the results are relevant to them. This
feeling of discomfort was called cognitive dissonance by social psychologist Leon Festinger (1957),
who suggested that individuals will be motivated to remove this dissonance in whatever way they
can (p. 191). It typically includes a summary of the research, a discussion of theoretical and practical
implications of the study, limitations of the study, and suggestions for future research. The All-in-1
Pack includes every chapter in this reader, as well as our beginner, intermediate and advanced
worksheets in one handy PDF. This lab report discussion example can be utilised as sample while
working on your own report. The experiment reported below attempted to fulfill these conditions (p.
378). Your final research paper is a make or break point for your gpa. We begin with a discussion of
American Psychological Association (APA) style—the primary approach to writing taken by
researchers in psychology and related fields. Citations should also appear for factual information that
is not common knowledge so that other researchers can check that information for themselves.
Presenting a talk or poster at a conference usually requires submitting an abstract of the research to
the conference organizers in advance and having it accepted for presentation—although the peer
review process is typically not as rigorous as it is for manuscripts submitted to a professional journal.
Occasionally, the results and discussion will be combined into one chapter. Finally, how this research
can be applied practically may also be outlined to the reader, and any research gaps generated by the
study explained. The authors’ names appear in the same order as on the article, which reflects the
authors’ relative contributions to the research. The Results section may also be divided according to
subheadings, especially if there were very strong trends or if there were multiple phases of the
project. In essence, poster sessions are a grown-up version of the school science fair. Thus formal
writing avoids slang, contractions, pop culture references, humor, and other elements that would be
acceptable in talking with a friend or in writing informally. Discuss the implications of your findings
realistically based on previous literature, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of the
research. It is through discussion you by providing evidence can demonstrate the signification of the
problem. Note that it includes everything mentioned above: notably research outcomes, limitations,
interpretations, and avenues for future research. If you're unsure of the best structure for your
research, look at sample the thesis structure outlined in this category is applicable to empirical
research in the (social) sciences. Beyond this shared interest, however, these colleagues are not
necessarily similar to the writer or to each other. Your discussion section allows you to take a fresh
perspective on your findings, so you can dig deep and provide new and original ideas from your
research. In addition to this, you can use themes for presenting your findings in a systematic manner.
Although researchers attending a professional conference are likely to discuss their work with each
other informally, there are two more formal types of presentation: oral presentations (“talks”) and
posters. At the end of this section is a sample APA-style research report that illustrates many of these
principles.
In a research methods course, papers are usually required to be written as though they were copy
manuscripts being submitted for publication. It intends to help the researcher in demonstrating the
way findings drawn from the research which you are performing will help the reader in increasing
their knowledge about specific problems. However, if there are other studies that have failed to
demonstrate it, you should discuss them too. Discussion section of dissertations interprets research
results and explains limitations of the study. Additionally, in this paper, methodology writing
techniques, procedures and important strategies are enlightened in a simple manner. Results and
discussions can either be combined into one section or organized as separate 5. This section usually
includes a critical review of both non-research and research literature, as well as any theoretical
perspectives that require understanding to support and contextualise the study. The results and
discussion sections are one of the challenging sections to write. Guidelines given in this study are
very clear to help the student to complete their article thesis and dissertation so researchers are
advised to follow the guidelines to write quality thesis. Patterns for ordering comments There are
two main patterns in placing your comments in a Results Section. It can also include variations in
line spacing that improve readability—such as using single spacing for table titles and figure
captions or triple spacing between major sections or around tables and figures. For example, if you
have completed a qualitative research project, you might have identified some key themes within the
in terms of presentation, both the findings and discussion chapters will benefit from a clear and
logical introduction and chapter summary. The chapter should begin with a brief introduction. To
display the research data and to show trends or relationships, for examples using graphs or gel the
discussion section. I realised this woman was a bit of a manipulator, even a master manipulator. You.
See Full PDF Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Related Papers Foundational Guide to
Research, Thesis and Dissertation Writing Dr Dare E Ajayi The complexities and diversities of
human nature and challenges necessitated the need to discover and identify ways to solving and
meeting human and academic problem needs. The paper intends to discuss the common format of
research report. She replied that she only had one question: “Should I tip?” (p. 3). Participants found
support in confirming that the behaviours were unreasonable by. One common way of getting
around this is to be less specific in the text. The research procedure and its nature have been
discussed from different scholars' point of view. Choose between a table or a figure to represent
your data. Although other subjects may of course use a slightly different number of sections, place
these seven sections in a slightly different order, or expect a different weighting for each section, the
example structure we’ve included below should cover most dissertation and thesis types that
students will be required to produce. Typically it begins with certain preliminary issues. Writing a
discussion can be a delicate balance between summarizing your results, providing proper context for
your research and avoiding introducing new information. A graduate student in California might be
writing an article that will be read by a young psychotherapist in New York City and a respected
professor of psychology in Tokyo. There is a significant positive relationship between the number of
hours spent by students in answering mathematics questions and their. Remember that your paper
should be both confident and honest about the results. For an edited book, the names of the editors
appear with their first and middle initials followed by their last names (not the other way
around)—with the abbreviation “Eds.” (or “Ed.,” if there is only one) appearing in parentheses
immediately after the final editor’s name. In general, however, the first approach works well when
you want to emphasize the person who conducted the research—for example, if you were comparing
the theories of two prominent researchers.
Discussion section of dissertations interprets research results and explains limitations of the study. It
is the genre of writing that psychologists use to communicate about their research with other
researchers and practitioners. Try not to blend elements of these two sections, in order to keep your
paper sharp. Don’t just state that more studies should be done—give concrete ideas for how future
work can build on areas that your own research was unable to address. The results section of a
scientific research paper represents the core findings of a study derived from the methods applied to
gather and analyze. For example, if your scientific research has a number of hypotheses and the
results are consistent with the hypotheses i do not see why separate the two sections in my limited
experience, it makes sense to separate results and discussion, in order to avoid an unnecessary
repetition of results. In a short report with a single study, this might require no more than a sentence.
All studies have limitations, and most readers will understand that a different sample or different
measures might have produced different results. An appendix could be used to present lists of
stimulus words, questionnaire items, detailed descriptions of special equipment or unusual statistical
analyses, or references to the studies that are included in a meta-analysis. She replied that she only
had one question: “Should I tip?” (p. 3). Technical terms must be used, but they are used to improve
communication, not simply to make the writing sound more “scientific.” For example, if participants
immersed their hands in a bucket of ice water, it is better just to write this than to write that they
“were subjected to a pain-inducement apparatus.” At the same time, however, there is no better way
to communicate that a between-subjects design was used than to use the term “between-subjects
design.”. Kate Blackwood (2015) Workplace bullying in the New Zealand. Place your findings in the
context of previous research. For example, if your scientific research has a number of hypotheses
and the results are consistent with the hypotheses i do not see why separate the two sections in my
limited experience, it makes sense to separate results and discussion, in order to avoid an
unnecessary repetition of results. During an orientation meeting at the nursing home, the rules and
regulations were explained, one of which regarded the dining room. In a theoretical article, of
course, much of the body of the manuscript is devoted to presenting the new theory. However, with a
small sample size, caution must be applied, as the. What reasons do you have for hedging any claims
about. No matter the subject, difficulty, academic level or document type, our writers have the skills
to complete it. One is whether any participants or responses were excluded from the analyses and
why. This paper has 5 parts such as Introduction, Literature reviews, Methodology, Results and
Conclusion. Second, it is important to emphasize the structure of your argument in your writing.
Some use them regularly, while others never use them. In the first, the participants section is
followed by a design and procedure subsection, which describes the rest of the method. The basic
structure of your argument, then, should be apparent from the outline itself. The heading at the top
of this page is the full title of the manuscript, with each important word capitalized as on the title
page. Although other subjects may of course use a slightly different number of sections, place these
seven sections in a slightly different order, or expect a different weighting for each section, the
example structure we’ve included below should cover most dissertation and thesis types that
students will be required to produce. Describe what you did and show how your methods match
your aims. It adopts a tone that is appropriate for communicating with professional
colleagues—other researchers and practitioners—who share an interest in the topic. Alternatively,
you can also begin by highlighting the most significant or unexpected results.
This works well for methods that are relatively simple and can be described adequately in a few
paragraphs. It was later expanded and published as a book by the association and is now in its sixth
edition. Unusual findings can be good, but they might also elicit more questions from the committee
and other readers, so make sure you have all the answers. If two sources have the same first author,
they are listed alphabetically by the last name of the second author. Every style guide has its own
rules for formatting table and figures, but in general tables are number sequentially with the number
and title listed above the graphic and any explanatory notes underneath. Few possible exceptions are
when the result incorporate previous result, or result from different research that indispensable to
own result, or part of he result has if the target journal author guide combine result and discussion
section, put the citations in the discussion for each result. Present the results that address this
specific research question first. For a more thorough description of the term conclusion as it applies
to academic writing, you can refer to this post. A manuscript published in a reputed journal also
serves as a validation of the work done by you. Here we will focus on formatting references for the
three most common kinds of works cited in APA style: journal articles, books, and book chapters.
Discussion section of dissertations interprets research results and explains limitations of the study.
Posters are used by professional researchers in all scientific disciplines and they are becoming
increasingly common. It presumes a level of analytical and interpretive skills that you are expected to
develop as students. HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing Student Success Presentation - Seven habits of
hi. But don?t simply announce a table or figure or restate its title: Table 1 shows The increase is
shown in Figure 2. Many presenters immediately offer to describe their research to visitors and use
the poster as a visual aid. The existence of problems gave rise to the the need for research. The results
and discussion are (relatively) cut and dried. The second is that a talk is generally structured like an
APA-style research report. No matter the subject, difficulty, academic level or document type, our
writers have the skills to complete it. Here are some of the events we've hosted to show you how
much we appreciate our customers and show you some of the fun new products coming out on the
market. The findings from these studies suggest that X can have an. Writing the results and
discussion as separate sections allows you to focus first on what results you obtained and set out
clearly what happened in your if you are unsure whether to include certain results, go back to your
research questions and decide whether the results are relevant to them. If your hypothesis was
disproved, what might be the reasons. Typically it begins with certain preliminary issues. Guidelines
given in this study are very clear to help the student to complete their article thesis and dissertation
so researchers are advised to follow the guidelines to write quality thesis. Publishing your results is a
vital step in the research lifecycle, as it allows you to get your work seen by the scientific to
contribute to the discussion and body of knowledge on some issues. In the first, the participants
section is followed by a design and procedure subsection, which describes the rest of the method.
From this perspective, many features of APA style that at first seem arbitrary actually make good
sense. It often works well to describe the procedure in terms of what the participants did rather than
what the researchers did.
How to Choose Best Research Methodology for Your Study Successful research conduction requires
proper planning and execution. It is also better for it to be organized in columns and flow from top
to bottom rather than to be organized in rows that flow across the poster. Their final sentence is, “If
people understand the situational forces that can make them hesitate to intervene, they may better
overcome them” (p. 383). However, this kind of ending can be difficult to pull off. Of course, you
should consult the Publication Manual or Online APA Style Resources for details on how to format
them. However, if there are other findings that are inconsistent with it, again, you should discuss
them too. The results section of a scientific research paper represents the core findings of a study
derived from the methods applied to gather and analyze. Each figure is given a brief explanatory
caption, where (aside from proper nouns or names) only the first word of each sentence is
capitalized. The results section is a section containing a description about the main findings of a
research figures: Occasionally, the results and discussion will be combined into one chapter. First, be
sensitive to labels by avoiding terms that are offensive or have negative connotations. Writing the
results and discussion as separate sections allows you to focus first on what results you obtained and
set out clearly what happened in your if you are unsure whether to include certain results, go back to
your research questions and decide whether the results are relevant to them. The combined approach
discusses results immediately after presenting them, thus saving readers the time they would have
otherwise spent on switching between sections. In a short report, your discussion section will also
include your conclusion(s) and you can therefore use other headings such as 'discussion and
conclusion', or simply 'conclusion(s)'. There are several computer-assisted qualitative data analysis
software (CAQDAS). Likewise, it is easier to read about research when it is presented in familiar and
expected ways. Your own interpretation of the results may be inaccurate, or the body text might not
properly demonstrate your findings. Participants found support in confirming that the behaviours
were unreasonable by. Therapist: Could it be that stress intensifies your symptoms? Also, note that
Figure is not abbreviated when used at the beginning of a sentence. Online resources for improving
word choice and grammar. It adopts a tone that is appropriate for communicating with professional
colleagues—other researchers and practitioners—who share an interest in the topic. The authors’
names appear in the same order as on the article, which reflects the authors’ relative contributions to
the research. You report these values by indicating the actual value and the associated significance
level. Based on information in this chapter, what are the main strengths and main weaknesses of each
poster. In short chapter 1 describes why the research question is being asked and chapter 3 describes
how the research question is answered. For a more thorough description of the term conclusion as it
applies to academic writing, you can refer to this post. Source: ihelptostudy.com Present the results
that address this specific research question first. But whatever they are, they should help organize the
manuscript and make the argument clear. Tips for Writing a Results Section Perhaps the best way to
use the results section is to show the most relevant information in the graphs, figures and tables. In
contrast, some can completely forget to acknowledge the limitations of their study. Below is an
example of a conclusion from a published research article. Abstract Vs. Introduction — Do you know
the difference.
For this reason, it could be argued that unless you make your research public in some form, you are
not really engaged in science at all. The discussion interprets the meaning of the results, puts them in
context, and explains why they matter. And you would not write a newspaper article, even if it were
about a new breakthrough in behavioral neuroscience, in APA style. HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing
Student Success Presentation - Seven habits of hi. One way to do this is to begin the literature
review by summarizing your argument even before you begin to make it. “In this article, I will
describe two apparently contradictory phenomena, present a new theory that has the potential to
resolve the apparent contradiction, and finally present a novel hypothesis to test the theory.” Another
way is to open each paragraph with a sentence that summarizes the main point of the paragraph and
links it to the preceding points. Presenting a talk or poster at a conference usually requires
submitting an abstract of the research to the conference organizers in advance and having it accepted
for presentation—although the peer review process is typically not as rigorous as it is for manuscripts
submitted to a professional journal. Our author-focused webinars and workshops primarily cater to
the needs of ESL authors, early-stage researchers, and graduate students who want to know more
about the issues pertinent to successful publication. Chapter 3: What is an effective dissertation
topic. Here are some examples from recent issues of the Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com In this case, perhaps a table or in our research paper
example, where the question is what is the concentration of cadmium in for instance, while many
journals require the results and discussion sections to be separate, others do. In this paper, I discuss
the PhD methodology, results and how to write a stunning conclusion for your thesis. The examples
are based on our research on HIV positive people, adolescent health and infertility issues. Eager to
reach the finishing line, they miss the opportunity to fully explore their findings and put them in the
context of other research in the field. It was later expanded and published as a book by the
association and is now in its sixth edition. In the journal title, however, all the important words are
capitalized. Results, analysis, discussion, and conclusion section help provide a space for you, as
researcher, to interpret findings of your study and juxtapose it with previous. Occasionally, the
results and discussion will be combined into one chapter. Slowly the pennies were beginning to drop
that these things were happening and. We have managers who’ve been in areas for a really long time.
Finally, we look at some of the many other ways in which researchers present their work, including
review and theoretical articles, theses and other student papers, and talks and posters at professional
meetings. Statements with “we investigated” or “we studied” generally do not belong in the
discussion. A systematic literature review is undertaken giving an overview of its processes and
principles. Limitations aren’t about listing your errors, but about providing an accurate picture of
what can and cannot be concluded from your study. The heading at the top of this page is the full
title of the manuscript, with each important word capitalized as on the title page. Regardless of what
journal you are submitting to, the discussion section always serves the same purpose: concluding
what your study results actually mean. Qualitative research paper 1 sample of the qualitative research
paper in the following pages you will find a sample of the full bgs research qualitative paper with
each section or chapter as it might look in a completed research paper beginning with the title page
and working through each chapter and section of the research paper. The results and discussion
sections are one of the challenging sections to write. At this point, make sure you have sufficiently
justified your methodological decisions in the methodology part of your thesis. It is also one of the
most difficult parts to write, and sometimes the longest. The rationale for excluding data should be
described clearly so that other researchers can decide whether it is appropriate.