Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dan Shen
Dan Shen
Dan Shen
321
2 Experimental
2.3 Solvent extraction (SE) phase consisted of A (water) and B (ACN) flowing at
1.0 mL/min. The gradient elution of mobile phase was
In order to compare the extraction efficiency of SFE with
60% (B) from 0 to 17 min, 60 – 80% (B) from 17 to 25 min,
conventional extraction using organic solvent, SE using
80% (B) from 25 to 30 min. The injection volume was
methanol was carried out according to the Chinese phar-
20 lL and the detection was carried out at 270 nm for all
macopoeia (2005). Mashed Danshen (0.3 g) and 50 mL of
samples analyzed.
methanol were placed in a conical flask and the suspen-
Representative HPLC-UV chromatograms of the four
sions were boiled for 1 h. The obtained solution was then
reference compounds and the supercritical fluids
centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 5 min. After filtering
extracts of S. miltiorrhiza under the condition listed above
through a 0.45 lm membrane filter, the supernatant sol-
are shown in Fig. 2.
ution was injected into the HPLC system for analysis.
Table 1. Factors and levels of the OAD shinones and then the extraction yields of these com-
pounds were calculated. The experimental results are
Level P (MPa) T (8C) t (h) F (L/h)
listed in Table 2.
A B C D
Table 2 indicates that the maximum extraction yields
1 20 40 1 20 of the four tanshinones were 0.98, 4.90, 2.28, and
2 30 50 2 25 7.19 mg/g, respectively. The yields of tanshinones
3 40 60 3 30 obtained were the average of three repeated measure-
ments. And it was also noticed that each of them
imparted different influence upon the yields of different
tanshinones. Therefore, if the analysis is only made based
2.6 Preparation of sample solution
on the statistics listed in Table 2, it was hard to select the
The product of SFE (2 mg) was accurately weighed, then best extraction conditions. So a further analysis was sub-
put into a clean dry volumetric flask (25 mL) and dis- sequently performed and listed in Table 3.
solved with methanol. The obtained solution was then From Table 3, it could be inferred that the Factor D
centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 5 min. After filtering (flow rate of CO2) is the most significant factor according
through a 0.45 lm membrane filter, the supernatant was to the R values, while the Factor C (the dynamic extrac-
injected into the HPLC system. tion time) is the insignificant one compared with the
others. Figure 3 was also helpful to obtain the optimized
SFE conditions. It shows the relationship between the
3 Results and discussion extraction yields of tanshinones and the four variables,
including the extraction pressure (20 – 40 MPa), extrac-
3.1 SFE experimental data analysis tion temperature (40 – 608C), dynamic extraction time
The first step in the SFE is to optimize the operating con- (1 – 3 h), and flow rate of CO2 (20 – 30 L/h).
ditions to obtain an efficient extraction of the target Table 4 shows the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the
compounds and avoid the coextraction of undesired experimental results, where the flow rate of CO2 contrib-
compounds such as fatty acids and their esters. utes as a significant factor for yield of dihydrotanshi-
Since various parameters potentially affect the extrac- none I with 95% confidence, while temperature, pres-
tion process, the optimization of the experimental condi- sure, and flow rate of CO2 are statistically significant for
tions is a critical step in developing an SFE method. Based cryptotanshinone. Besides, all the four factors have no
on the previous knowledge of SFE, the extraction pres- significant effect on the yields of tanshinone I and tanshi-
sure and temperature, the dynamic extraction time and none IIA. Since the four compounds have the different
flow rate of CO2 are usually considered as the most chemical structures and physical properties, it is not sur-
important factors of SFE. They were investigated at first prising that, with 95% confidence, the various param-
during this study using a three-level OAD. We focused on eters have quite different effects on the yields of the four
the main effects of them and the interactions among tanshinones. The optimization of the experimental con-
different variables were not considered in the matrix. ditions should be obtained by analyzing the effects of the
The extract obtained from each test was quantitatively different operating conditions on the yields of tanshi-
analyzed by HPLC to determine the contents of four tan- nones.
Table 3. Analysis of L9 (3)4 test results Table 4. ANOVA table for the SFE of tanshinones by using
OA9 (34)
Parameters
Source of Sum of Degree of Mean F-value F0.05
A B C D variance squares freedom square
15.0 ng for cryptotanshinone, 20.0 ng for tanshinone I, cryptotanshinone, tanshinone I, and tanshinone IIA from
and 7.8 ng for tanshinone IIA at a S/N of 10, respectively. the product of SFE with good sensitivity, precision, and
The intra- and interday precision was determined by a repeatability. And it can be applied as an improved qual-
standard mixture solution of the four tanshinones under ity control analysis method for Danshen products.
the selected chromatography conditions six times in a
day for intraday precision and once a day on three con- Financial supports from Chinese National Key Technologies R&D
secutive days for interday precision. And the RSD was Program (Grant No. 2006BAI06A08) and from the Science and
taken as a measure of the intra- and interday precisions, Technology Department of Zhejiang Province, China (Grant No.
which were less than 1.26 and 0.29%, respectively. 2007C23G2090017) are gratefully acknowledged.
Standard addition test was performed to determine
recoveries of the four tanshinones. In this assay, the
standard solutions with different concentration levels 5 References
were prepared and added to the samples with known [1] Lu, Y. R., Foo, L. Y., Phytochemistry 2002, 59, 117 – 140.
content. The resultant samples were analyzed using the [2] Kasimu, R., Tanaka, K., Tezuka, Y., Gong, Z. N., Li, J. X., Basnet, P.,
developed HPLC method mentioned above. The experi- Namba, T., Kadota, S., Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1998, 46, 500 – 504.
ments were repeated three times for each level. The ratio [3] Zheng, G. C., Kakisawa, H., Pharm. Chin. J. 1989, 24, 6 – 10.
[4] Kong, D. Y., Chin. J. Pharm. 1989, 20, 279 – 285.
of measured and added amounts was used to calculate
[5] Huang, M. H., Lu, X. Z., Chin. J. Pharm. 1992, 23, 279 – 283.
the recovery. The recovery of the investigated compo-
[6] Lei, X. L., Chiou, G. C., Am. J. Chin. Med. 1986, 14, 145 – 52.
nents ranged from 97.2 to 103.8%, and their RSD values [7] Tian, G. L., Zhang, T. Y., Zhang, Y. B., Ito, Y., J. Chromatogr. A 2002,
were less than 3.7%. Considering the results of the recov- 945, 281 – 285.
ery test, the method is accurate. [8] Chang, H. M., Cheng, K. P., Choang, T. F., Chow, H. F., Chui, K. Y.,
Hon, P. M., Tan, F. W. L., Yang, Y., Zhong, Z. P., J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 3537 – 3543.
[9] Sun, L., Lee, H. K., J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1014, 165 – 177.
4 Concluding remarks [10] Sonsuzer, S., Sahin, S., Yilmaz, L., J. Supercrit. Fluids 2004, 30,
189 – 199.
Because the therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese
[11] Ghasemi, E., Yamini, Y., Bahramifar, N., Sefidkon, F., J. Food Eng.
medicine is frequently based on the combination of the 2007, 79, 306 – 311.
major components, study on extraction focusing on mul- [12] Hawthorne, S. B., Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 633A – 642A.
ticomponent objectives is more reasonable to evaluate [13] Langenfeld, J. J., Hawthorne, S. B., Miller, D. J., Pawliszyn, J., Anal.
the SFE process developed. In the present study, the Chem. 1994, 66, 909 – 916.
effects of four main experimental factors, extraction [14] Taylor, L. T., Supercritical Fluid Extraction, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Toronto 1996.
pressure and temperature, dynamic extraction time, and [15] Lang, Q., Wai, C. M., Talanta 2001, 53, 771 – 782.
CO2 flow rate on the SFE yields of tanshinones from [16] Dean, J. R., Liu, B., Price, R., J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 799, 343 – 348.
Danshen, the dried root of S. miltiorrhiza, were investi- [17] Liu, A. H., Lin, Y. H., Yang, M., Guo, H., Guan, S. H., Sun, J. H.,
gated. Statistical analysis showed that the optimum con- Guo, D. A., J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 846, 32 – 41.
ditions for extraction of tanshinones by SFE are as: [18] Zhao, Y., Chen, B., Yao, S. Z., J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 38, 564 –
570.
P = 40 MPa, T = 508C, and t = 1 h, and CO2 flow rate,
[19] Gu, M., Zhang, G. F., Su, Z. G., Ouyang, F., J. Chromatogr. A 2004,
F = 25 L/h. 1041, 239 – 243.
Meanwhile, a novel HPLC method was developed for [20] Tian, G. L., Zhang, Y. B., Zhang, T. Y., Yang, F. Q., Ito, Y., J. Chroma-
simultaneous determination of dihydrotanshinone I, togr. A 2000, 904, 107 – 111.
[21] Shi, Z. H., He, J. T., Yao, T. T., Chang, W. B., Zhao, M. P., J. Pharm. [25] Valle, J. M., Rivera, O., Mattea, M., Ruetsch, L., Daghero, J., Flores,
Biomed. Anal. 2005, 37, 481 – 486. A., J. Supercrit. Fluids 2004, 31, 159 – 174.
[22] Pan, X. J., Niu, G. G., Liu, H. Z., J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 922, 371 – [26] Ge, F. H., Zhang, J. C., Chen, L., Li, J., Huang, X. F., Chin. J. Pharm.
375. 2000, 31, 250 – 253.
[23] Pan, X. J., Niu, G. G., Liu, H. Z., Biochem. Eng. J. 2002, 12, 71 – 77.
[24] Zhang, J., Wang, L., Yuan, C. L., Wang, X. Q., Yu, Z. L., Chin. J. Anal.
Chem. 2005, 33, 355 – 358.