Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • spk3 1

    Uploaded by

    Hoa Bùi
    9 views2 pages
    The speaker argues against the motion that MOOCs mark the end of traditional universities. They criticize the arguments made by the previous speakers in favor of the motion. The speaker notes that the evidence presented was weak and based on personal opinions rather than convincing facts. The speaker then presents two studies that found completion rates for MOOCs to be very low, around 7-11%, and identified lack of motivation as a primary reason for not completing courses. In contrast, the speaker argues that traditional universities like their own, LUK Global, provide strong motivation to learn through peer support, feedback from coaches, and an engaging discussion-based learning environment that encourages students to work harder and improve. MOOCs, the speaker claims, lack this

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    spk3-1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The speaker argues against the motion that MOOCs mark the end of traditional universities. They criticize the arguments made by the previous speakers in favor of the motion. The speaker notes that the evidence presented was weak and based on personal opinions rather than convincing facts. The speaker then presents two studies that found completion rates for MOOCs to be very low, around 7-11%, and identified lack of motivation as a primary reason for not completing courses. In contrast, the speaker argues that traditional universities like their own, LUK Global, provide strong motivation to learn through peer support, feedback from coaches, and an engaging discussion-based learning environment that encourages students to work harder and improve. MOOCs, the speaker claims, lack this

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    9 views2 pages

    spk3 1

    Uploaded by

    Hoa Bùi
    The speaker argues against the motion that MOOCs mark the end of traditional universities. They criticize the arguments made by the previous speakers in favor of the motion. The speaker notes that the evidence presented was weak and based on personal opinions rather than convincing facts. The speaker then presents two studies that found completion rates for MOOCs to be very low, around 7-11%, and identified lack of motivation as a primary reason for not completing courses. In contrast, the speaker argues that traditional universities like their own, LUK Global, provide strong motivation to learn through peer support, feedback from coaches, and an engaging discussion-based learning environment that encourages students to work harder and improve. MOOCs, the speaker claims, lack this

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Hi everybody. It's an honor to be the speaker 3 of negative team.

    First of all, I want to say some thing about the performance of speaker from the affirmative team

    Speaker 1 He said….

    Speaker 2 he said was…


    Speaker 3 he said that

    Although I try very hard to understand, I'm sorry I can't. Your agument is so bad It’s only about how
    good is Moocs. The motion is moocs mark an end to the traditional university and you agree with it but I
    don’t see how moocs destroy.

    your evidence is also very weak. it is mostly just personal opinion, it's not convince, that's why the
    audience doesn't understand you.

    You say mooks gives us convenience, flexibility. I am so curious about how effective it is. Follow my
    speaker 2. completion rate of moocs is very low. And motivation is one of the main reson. That’s why I
    am here today
    my opinion: moocs is unmotivated environment for learners.

    Evidence 1: According to PSG Institute of Management it is top 22


    Bussiness school, in 2018, they make a survey on 375 people who learn
    in Moocs, the result show that completion rates is 7-11% and they say
    main reasons is motivation.
    https://collegedunia.com/college/6258-psg-institute-of-management-
    psgim-coimbatore
    ……………
    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1190023.pdf
    Evidence 2: According to survey of American University of Phnom Penh (this uni is
    partner of Arizona of University )
    They do a Survey on about 254 students found that 69.6% (179 students) say
    they have dropped or never completed MOOC, and you know what? the main
    reason is motivation again.
    https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/7/336?fbclid=IwAR3AkJMZJLuhjwlFQwTI5-
    fBZ_gBJdLyewLj835JyJDiK6s1MG1gGCg2dpk
    So I wonder why the moocs is so bad at motivate the learner. after many hour researching I question
    myself why not looking at here where we study now. LUK global. Is it an Course of traditional university?
    yah. In LUK, I gain so much motivation. You, audience, you give me motivation to do this speech, you
    coach you also give me motivation to learn, you guy always try the best to make us become the better
    version, if I not try harder, I will not deserve it. In Luk we clap hand, we discuss about motion, we cheer
    people up. We are giving each other the motivation to learn. And in moocs when you only looking at the
    screen learn by yourself you will lose these amazing thing.

    You might also like