Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NACA
NACA
NACA
Source of Acquisition
CASI Acquired
Restriction/Classification Cancelled
^^^^ FFF F ,FC ^FF ^ j ^ ^`9 ^F ^ ^ ^i.P ^^
NACA RM No. SE8A28 x F F F
RESEARCH MEMORANDUM
for the
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Blade failures in the 10-stage axial-flow compressor of the
191B ,jet-propulsion engine, presumably caused by vibration, have
been reported by the manufacturer. The failures are believed to
have originated in the seventh and tenth stages at high engine speed
and high pressure ratio. At the request of the Bureau of Aeronautics,
Navy Department, a series of vibration surveys is being conducted at
the NACA Cleveland laboratory to determine the cause of these failures
and to devise a means of eliminating them.
Little published information is available on experimental
measurements of the factors that cause blade vibration; the vibration
characteristics were therefore investigated in a ,jet engine under
actual operating conditions. Prior to the dynamic investigation, the
l `/ 'F 7 3
^ ^ F%^ F FFFl FF ^ FF
.! F ^ ^^ ^
2 NACA RM No. SE8A28
The rotor speed was varied until blade vibrations were indicated
by the strain-gage signals, at which time the speed was held constant
while photographic records were taken. The engine was accelerated
and decelerated at 400 rpm per second over the entire speed range,
permitting the vibrations to build up to maximums, while continuous
records were being taken. The amount of vibratory stress indicated
was determined by comparing signal heights recorded with the heights
of signals produced by a calibration instrument using similar strain
gages. The vibratory stress signals were corrected for the frequency
response of the recording equipment.
not be evaluated in the seventh and tenth stage during the prelim-
inary dynamic investigation because the resonant condition required
speeds higher than those obtainable.
The rotor used in this investigation came from one of the first
experimental 19XB units and apparently a tolerance change or a change
due to the reblading caused the natural frequencies of the new blades
to be higher than those of the original blades. It was found that
the average of the - natural frequencies of the new blades was. 9.8 per-
cent higher than that previously detetmined in reference 1. This
increase in natural frequency and a 4.7-percent increase in frequency
induced by the stiffening effect of the strain-gage installation
made it impossible to reach a fourth- and sixth-order resonant con-
dition in the seventh and tenth stages, respectively, without
dangerously overspeeding the engine. Artificial reduction of the
natural frequencies may permit attainment of these resonances.
It was suspected that part of the cause for the low measured
vibratory stresses might be the additional damping introduced by
the presence of the strain gage. The damping values were measured
at static conditions for blades with and without gages. In the last
five stages; the vibratory stresses might have been reduced by gage
installation, as indicated by figure 7; the information is inconclu-
sive, however, because the effect of rotational forces on damping
properties is unknown. The inlet guide vanes used also may have
lowered the vibrational stresses as well as the compression load,
consequently reducing the bending stresses in the rear stages of the
compressor. The results of static tests performed to correlate the
vibratory-stress magnitudes with the tip amplitudes and with loads
of .the blades are shown for the seventh and tenth stages in figure 8.
Extrapolation of this information indicates that vibrations with tip
amplitudes of 10.055 and ±0.084 inch must be attained to cause
failure of seventh- and tenth-stage blades, respectively.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
4. For all stages, it was found that the higher the order of
vibration the lower the stress. An exception to the trend was
discovered in each stage.
REFERENCES
1. Meyer, Andre J., Jr., and Calvert, Howard F.: Vibration Survey
of Blades in Westinghouse 19XB Axial-Flow Compressor. I - Static
Tests. NACA RM No. E6J11, Bur. Aero., 1946.
2. Meyer, Andre J., Jr., and Calvert, Howard F.: 'Vibration Survey
of Blades in 19-XB Axial-Flow Compressor. II - Dynamic Investi-
gation. NACA RA No. E7D09, Bur. Aero., 1947.
3. Downing, Richard M., Finger, Harold B., and Roepcke, Fay A.: Per-
formance of the 19XB 10-Stage Axial-Flow Compressor with Altered
Blade Angles. NACA RA No. E7A21, Bur. Aero., 1947.
4. Noll, G. C., and Lipson, C.: Allowable Working Stresses. Proc. Soc.
Exp. Stress Analysis, vol. III., no. 2, 1946 ) pp. 89-101.
.11
RESTRICTED
H and F. Calvert,
Mechanical Engineer.
Approved: 1o^•^^u
ohn H. Collins, J .'
Mechanical Engineer.
jh
RESTRICTFM
NACA RM No. SE8A28 7
ry
o, n
V-
m
m
m
W
NACA RM No. SEBA28 8
2400
2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
a
U
1200
C.
v
d
F+
w 1000
800
600
400
200
0 3
Frequency
p Measured
— -- Calculated
Order of rotor speed
640 5 4 3
560
03
a
U
w
U 480
N
C7'
m
w
400
NACA
320
0 4 8 12 16 x103
Rotor speed, rpm
(a) First stage.
Figure 3. - Critical-speed diagram showing measured and
calculated first bending-mode frequencies.
NACA RM No. SE8A28 10
Frequency
4 Measured
— — --Calculated
Order of rotor speed
6 5 4 3
720
640
to
U
w
560
a^ ®-4-
v
k
480
NACA
v I i 1
400 1 1 f 1 P
0 4 8 12 16x10 3
Rotor speed, rpm
(b) Second stage.
Figure 3. - Continued. Critical-speed diagram showing
measured and calculated first bending-node frequencies.
NACA RM No, SESA28 91
Frequency
O Measured
--- -- Calculated
Order of rotor speed i
800
6 5 4
720
O
Go
P4
a
640
O ^
i
k
i
560 e
NACA
480
0 4 8 12 16 x103
Rotor speed, rpm
Frequency
O Measured
— — — Calculated
Order of rotor speed
960 8 7 6 5 4
880
0
0
a, 800
v
v
0
0
o 720
14
w
640
NACA
560
0 4 8 12 16x103
Rotor speed, rpm
(d) Fourth stage.
Figure 3. - Continued. Critical-speed diagram showing
measured and calculated first bending-mode frequencies.
NACA RM No. SE8A28 13
Frequency
O Measured
— — — — Calculated
Order of rotor speed
1280 8, 7 6 5
1200
1120
A
s^
1040
960
NACA
880
0 4 8 12 16 20x103
Rotor speed, rpm
(e) Seventh stage.
Figure 3. - Continued. Critical-speed diagram showing
measured and calculated first bending mode frequencies.
NACA RM, No. SE8A28 14
Frequency
0 Measured
----- — Calculated
11 Order of rotor speed
19 in Q A 7 A A
1440
1360
a
U
w
m 1280
Q'
m
P
w
1200
NACA
1120
0 4 8 12 16 20x103
Rotor speed, rpm
(f) Eighth stage.
S
Figure 3. - Continued. Critical-speed diagram showing
measured and calculated first bending-mode frequencies.
0
Frequency
o Measured, blade 78
O Measured, blade 41
— — — -- Calculated
1520
a,
U
N
1440
a^
v{
(D
A4
D:4
1360
NACA
1280
0 4 8 12 16 20x10`
Rotor speed, rpm
Frequency
o Measured
— — — — Calculated
V-
16 14 12 Order of rotor speed
17 15 13 11 10 9 8 7 6
2000
1920
m
v 1840
A
U
m
Q^
1760
w
1680
NACA
1600
0 4 8 12 16 20x103
Rotor speed, rpm
(h) Tenth stage.
Figure 3. - Concluded. Critical-speed diagram showing
measured and calculated first bending-mode frequencies.
6000
z
D
n
D
Z7
•
5000
z0
U)
M
A
r-I
CO
DN
w CO
N 4000
a^
)1
m
0
3000
A
va^
s^
2000
cd
w
1000
0 4 8 12 16 0 4 8 12 16
Order of excitation
(a) Seventh stage (blade 21). (b) Eighth stage (blade 46).
Figure 4. - Relation of magnitude of observed stresses to order of excitation.
6000
z
D
n
D
;U
•
Y+ Z
5000 0
o•
m
M
co
D
N
co
CD
m 4000
s,
0
ti 3000
p
b
m
c,
2000
a^
1000
0 4 a 12 16 20 0 4 8 12 16
Order of excitation
(c) Tenth stage (blade 1).. (d) Tenth stage (blade 38).
Figure 4. - Concluded. Relation of magnitude of, observed stresses to order number.
OD
Z
D
(7
D
40,000
Z
O
a U)
m
CO
^rl DN
C3' 00
30,000
,D
ri
ft
qp
N
4a 20 s 000
10
bo
P
10,000
a^
U
NACA
0 4 8 12 16 20x103
Rotor speed, rpm
Figure 5. Calculated centrifugal stresses at base of
blades of first and tenth stages.
^o
50,000 Z
nDD
•
to z
0
a' 10
40,000 U)
M
CD
a--i D
N
w CD
4)
F,
w 30,000
> 20,000
a,
,n
c^
30
10,000
k NACA
td
0 4 8 12 16 20 x103
,05
.04
a
9
10
o .03
d
^i
U
v .02
U
on
ti
m •01
a
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Stage of compressor
t
NACA RM No. SE8A28 22
10,000
8,000
.fl
a
to 6,000
m
+,
Stag
e/
M 7
ao
4,000
^i 10
rQ
2,000
NASA
w n n .^ -^ ^ -3
0 z V s, cs 1V111V
10,000
to
7
8,000
v'
.a
6,000
10
ao
b
4,000
w
2,000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Load at tip of blade, lb
(b) Tip loading.
Figure 8. - Concluded. Static stress for blade tip amplitude and
loading,