BAGUINSODON, REYKNYLL REIGN L.

CTE, BSED – ENGLISH 3RD YEAR

CAED500C (8708)

LET`S CHECK!
ACTIVITY 5

Using the Decision-making wheel as guide, resolve the given dilemma below. Comprehensively
provide your answer.

2. CHOICES

3. CONSEQUE-
9. ASSESS DECISION
NCES

8. DECISION 1. PROBLEM 4. VALUES

7. WHO CAN HELP 5. FEELINGS

6. MORE INFORMATION
 David is a student in a school district where his mother is on the school board.
Recently, three of his classmates posted a web site that openly attacks some of the teachers
and students, using explicit and offensive language. It even goes as far as predicting which
gay students will be the first to die of AIDS. Remarks about several teachers are scathing,
suggesting that one fantasizes about having with s e x young girls and that two married
teachers are having an affair. The site includes explicit graphics.

Several weeks ago David learned the identities of the three students who created the
website when one of them accidentally said something to him in a conversation. The other
two quickly corralled David and pressured him not to reveal their names. He agreed, not
thinking much about it at the time. David used to be close to one of the three students, but
that friendship has faded.

Now, the school principal has obtained a program that allows him to identify each
person who has visited the website. He is asking students to come forward with the names
of the creators of the site, and if no one does, he is going to question each student who visited
the site. David is one of those who did visit the site. He realizes he may be the only student
who knows the names of the three kids who created the site. He can lie and say he doesn’t
know, or he can break his promise not to tell.

David has always thought of himself as a person of morals with a pretty clear sense
of right and wrong. Right now, however, he feels that either choice will end in disaster. What
should David do?
1. Problem:
David faces a moral dilemma regarding whether to reveal the identities of three
classmates who created a harmful website attacking teachers and students. He had
promised not to disclose their names, and now, the school principal sought
information. David is torn between loyalty and the potential harm caused by the
website.

2. Choices:
Choice 1: Lie about knowing the creators
Pros: Maintains loyalty to his promise and avoids potential conflict.
Cons: Allows harmful content to persist may contribute to a hostile school
environment.

Choice 2: Break the promise and reveal the names

Pros: Addressing harm contributes to a safer environment and upholds ethical
standards.
Cons: Risks damaging relationships and personal discomfort.

3. Consequences:
Consequences of Choice 1
 Harmful content on websites persists, potentially affecting the school
community.
 Immediate avoidance of conflict and potential damage to relationships.

Consequences of Choice 2
 The harm caused by the website is addressed to promote a safer school
environment.
 Risk of damaging the relationships and personal discomfort.

4. Values
Values relevant to Choice 1:
 Loyalty to promises and avoidance of immediate conflict.
 Short-term personal comfort.

Values relevant to Choice 2

 Responsibility to address harm and create a safer environment.
 Upholding ethical standards considering the well-being of the entire school
community.
5. Feelings:
David is likely experiencing internal conflict, torn between loyalty to his promise and
the desire to address the harm caused by the website. They may feel a sense of
moral discomfort.

6. More Information:
 Understanding the potential legal implications of website content.
 Gathering insights into schools’ policies regarding such incidents.
 Reflecting on long-term impact on school communities.

7. Who Can Help:

 A trusted adult, counselor, or teacher who can provide guidance and support.
 School principals or other school authorities can offer insights into the handling of
such situations.

8. Decision:
Based on ethical considerations and the potential harm caused by the website, the
recommendation is for David to break promises and reveal names.

9. Assess Decision:
David should consider the potential short-term consequences of damaged
relationships but weigh them against the long-term benefits of addressing harm and
contributing to a safer school environment. Seeking support and guidance from a
trusted adult can help him navigate the aftermath of his decisions.

In navigating this complex dilemma, David faces a crucial decision that

balances loyalty, personal values, and the well-being of the school community. While
both choices come with their set of consequences, the recommendation is for David
to break the promise and reveal the names, align with ethical standards, and
prioritize the safety of the school environment. In making this decision, David should
consider seeking guidance from a trusted adult and preparing for potential short-term
challenges in relationships. By addressing the harm caused by the website, he
contributes to fostering a more inclusive and secures educational community for
everyone.