Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q3 Reviewer
Q3 Reviewer
Argument is defined as “a reason or reasons why you support or oppose an idea or suggestion,
or the process of explaining these reasons” in Cambridge dictionary.
Argumentative essay
● a genre of writing that requires the student to investigate a topic; collect, generate, and
evaluate evidence; and establish a position on the topic in a concise manner.
● a kind of text in which an author supports his own view and try to refute a counterview
about an issue.
● The author aims to lead readers to think just like himself in this kind of texts. It is not
easy to change readers’ views or make them question.
● The author is expected to explain why he supports these views and why counterview is
invalid so as to achieve his goal.
● The author is supposed not only to have a strong idea about the issue discussed but
also to be wise for a successful argumentative essay (Knudson, 1992).
B. Thesis Paragraph 3
● a sentence that explains Support 2 (second reason)
what you are trying to prove ● Explanation, detail,
and provides an overview of example
the arguments you will make
in your body paragraphs.
Paragraph 3
Support 2 (second reason): From a medical standpoint, marijuana has demonstrated
therapeutic potential in alleviating symptoms of various conditions, including chronic pain,
multiple sclerosis, and chemotherapy-induced nausea. Legalization would facilitate research,
leading to safer and more effective treatments.
Evidence: A recent study by Harvard Medical School found that states with medical marijuana
laws experienced a 25% reduction in annual opioid overdose deaths.
Paragraph 4
Support 3 (third reason): The legalization of marijuana can generate substantial tax revenue
for governments, which could be channeled toward education, healthcare, and infrastructure
development, benefiting society as a whole.
Example: In Colorado, where recreational marijuana was legalized in 2014, over $302 million in
tax revenue was generated in 2021 alone.
Paragraph 5
Opposite Side: Opponents argue that legalizing marijuana would increase its accessibility,
potentially leading to higher rates of substance abuse and addiction, particularly among youth.
Counterargument: This claim is not substantiated by evidence from states and countries where
marijuana has been legalized with proper regulations and age restrictions in place.
Rebuttal: Stringent enforcement of age limits and public education campaigns can mitigate
these concerns, similar to policies surrounding alcohol and tobacco.
Conclusion (Paragraph 6)
Thesis Restatement: The legalization of marijuana presents a compelling opportunity to curtail
illegal drug operations, advance medical research, and generate valuable tax revenue for
societal benefit.
Opinion: While concerns exist, they can be effectively addressed through responsible
regulation and public awareness initiatives. It is time to embrace a pragmatic approach and
legalize marijuana, reaping its potential advantages while mitigating its risks.
Body:
More Information: EVs are powered by rechargeable batteries, which store electrical energy
that is then used to propel the vehicle's electric motor. Unlike conventional vehicles that rely on
fossil fuels, EVs produce zero direct emissions, making them an environmentally-friendly choice.
The technology behind EVs has advanced rapidly in recent years, with improved battery
capacities, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times. Many automakers now offer a wide
range of EV models, from compact cars to luxury sedans and even trucks and SUVs.
One of the key advantages of EVs is their lower operating costs. While the initial purchase price
may be higher than gasoline-powered vehicles, the cost of "refueling" an EV with electricity is
significantly lower than buying gasoline. Additionally, EVs require less maintenance, as they
have fewer moving parts and no need for oil changes or tune-ups.
Rhetorical Question: Are you ready to embrace the future of transportation and contribute to a
cleaner, more sustainable world?
Conclusion:
Summarizing Conclusion: As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of climate
change and air pollution, electric vehicles present a promising solution. With their zero direct
emissions, lower operating costs, and continuously improving technology, EVs are poised to
play a crucial role in shaping a more sustainable future for transportation.
Body:
State the arguments with supporting evidence:
Firstly, EVs are a game-changer when it comes to reducing our carbon footprint. Unlike
conventional vehicles that spew harmful emissions, EVs produce zero direct emissions, making
them an eco-friendly solution to our transportation needs. According to a recent study by the
Union of Concerned Scientists, driving an EV can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an
astounding 67% compared to gasoline-powered cars.
Secondly, the long-term cost savings of owning an EV are remarkable. While the upfront cost
may be higher, the lack of fuel expenses and minimal maintenance requirements result in
substantial savings over time. A report by the Department of Energy estimates that the average
EV owner can save up to $6,000 in fuel costs over five years compared to driving a
gas-powered vehicle.
Moreover, the technology behind EVs is continuously advancing, offering longer ranges, faster
charging times, and improved performance. With major automakers investing billions in EV
development, we can expect even more impressive models to hit the market in the coming
years, making the transition to electric mobility more appealing than ever before.
Rhetorical question: Can we afford to ignore the overwhelming benefits of EVs and continue
contributing to the degradation of our planet?
Emotive language and repetition: The time to act is now. Embracing EVs is not merely a
choice; it is a responsibility we owe to ourselves, our children, and generations to come. Let us
not be remembered as the generation that turned a blind eye to a solution that could potentially
save our planet.
Conclusion:
Summing up by restating the point of view: In conclusion, the advantages of electric vehicles
are undeniable. They offer a cleaner, more sustainable, and cost-effective solution to our
transportation needs. It is time for us to join the electric revolution and pave the way for a
greener, healthier future. Let us make the wise choice and embrace EVs wholeheartedly.
Body:
Series of paragraphs with arguments:
Firstly, the environmental impact of traditional gasoline-powered vehicles is catastrophic. They
are a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating the effects of climate
change. Consequently, a shift to EVs, which produce zero direct emissions, is imperative to
mitigate this global crisis.
Secondly, our reliance on finite fossil fuels is unsustainable. As these resources dwindle, the
prices of gasoline will inevitably skyrocket. EVs, on the other hand, can be charged using
renewable energy sources, making them a cost-effective and future-proof solution.
Thirdly, the health implications of air pollution caused by vehicle emissions cannot be ignored.
Switching to EVs would significantly improve air quality, reducing respiratory illnesses and
creating a safer environment for all.
Counter-arguments:
However, critics argue that the high upfront costs of EVs make them inaccessible to many.
While this is a valid concern, governments can incentivize EV adoption through tax credits and
subsidies, making them more affordable.
On the other hand, some claim that the production of EV batteries is environmentally damaging.
This is a short-sighted argument, as the long-term benefits of EVs far outweigh the initial
environmental impact of battery production.
Conclusion:
Summary and restating opinion: In summary, the case for embracing electric vehicles is
compelling. They offer a sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally-friendly solution to our
transportation needs. It is my firm belief that we must urgently transition to this technology, for
the sake of our planet and the generations to come.
LANGUAGE FEATURES
Repetition - It is a rhetorical device to bring attention to an idea to make a stronger impact to
the reader.
Ex: Come one, Come all
I’m nobody! Who are you? Are you nobody?
Emotive language - These are words which evoke a strong emotional reaction.
Ex: blessed, courageous, freedom, innocent
Rhetorical question - It is a question that does not expect an answer but is simply asked to
make a point or make the people think.
Ex: Who cares?
When are you going to act?
Opinion/explanation - Phrases in giving opinions
Ex: In actual fact...
In my opinion...
I believe.../ I feel...
Contradictions - Phrases in giving opinions which go against your argument
Ex: Some people believe...
It has been said that...
Exclamations - These are short sentences that emphasize dramatic point
Ex: Watch out!
Just do it!
CRITIQUING
➢ Writing a critique requires you to reassemble the elements in such a way that your
intended audience has a better understanding of the story's strengths, weaknesses, and
highlights.
➢ Critiquing a story is not primarily making a summary; rather, it gives comments and
evaluates the specific work.
➢ It is an in-depth evaluation of the story for the purpose of giving the reading public insight
into the story.
What is a critique?
- A critique is a genre of scholastic and academic writing that critically assesses work or
ideas. Critiques can be used to carefully analyze a variety of works such as:
❖ Creative works – novels, exhibits, film, images, poetry
❖ Research – monographs, journal articles, systematic reviews, theories
❖ Media – news reports, feature articles
AUTHOR'S INTENTION ● What is the author trying to accomplish with the story?
LITERARY DEVICES ● Figures of speech used in the story and their purpose.
Ex: Simile, Metaphor, Personification
LITERARY TECHNIQUES ● Ask yourself if these literary techniques make the reading
experience more enjoyable or strengthen the story.
Ex: Flashbacks, Foreshadowing, Pacing
ENDING OF THE STORY ● Decide how the ending relates both to the story as a whole and to
its beginning.
● Does the ending resolve the plot and bring closure to the crisis of
the character?
Marxist Approach ❖ works in philosophy that ➔ Film - "Heneral Luna" (2015) directed
are strongly influenced by Jerrold Tarog: This historical
by Karl Marx’s biopic can be analyzed from a
materialist approach to Marxist perspective, examining the
theory or works written social and economic dynamics
by Marxists. during the Philippine-American War
❖ extended into fields as and the struggle for independence.
varied as aesthetics, ➔ Film - "Sorry to Bother You" (2018)
ethics, ontology, directed by Boots Riley: This satirical
epistemology, comedy film can be analyzed from a
theoretical psychology, Marxist approach, exploring themes
and philosophy of of labor exploitation, capitalism, and
science as well as its class struggle in a surreal and
obvious influence on thought-provoking narrative.
political philosophy and
the philosophy of
history.